The aim of this study is to investigate the myeloprotective effects of different amifostine regimens in rabbits undergoing high-dose treatment with (186)Rhenium-(tin)1,1-hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate (Re-186-HEDP) and to analyze the impact of amifostine on the bone uptake of the radiopharmaceutical. All animals were treated with 1000 MBq Re-186-HEDP. Group ReA received 500 mg amifostine prior to radionuclide therapy, group ReA3 received 3 X 200 mg amifostine 24 hours and 30 minutes prior to and 24 hours after radionuclide therapy. Group ReC served as control receiving no amifostine. Scintigrams were acquired to quantify the skeletal uptake of Re-186-HEDP, and platelet and leucocyte counts were measured. The mean decrease in platelets was 36% +/- 2%, 37% +/- 3%, and 61% +/- 5% for ReA, ReA3, and ReC, respectively. The decrease in ReC was significantly higher than in amifostine-treated animals with no difference between ReA and ReA3. For the leucocytes the mean decrease was 75% +/- 12%, 82% +/- 5%, and 73% +/- 4%, with no significant differences between the respective groups. Bone uptake of Re-186-HEDP was significantly reduced by 50% in ReA and ReA3 compared to ReC. Thus, the 3-day amifostine regimen had no advantage over the single dose regimen, with both regimens reducing bone uptake and yielding a platelet-protective but no leucoprotective effect.

UNLABELLED:The aim of this animal study was to measure the bone uptake of (99m)Tc-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate (HDP) before and after high-dose treatment with (153)Sm-ethylenediaminetetramethylenephosphonate (EDTMP) or (186)Re-(tin)1,1-hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate (HEDP) to prove or disprove post-therapeutic alterations of bone uptake of radiolabeled bisphosphonates. METHODS:Quantitative bone scanning using 100 MBq (99m)Tc-HDP was performed on 12 rabbits before and 8 wk after radionuclide therapy with 1,000 MBq of either (153)Sm-EDTMP or (186)Re-HEDP. Whole-body images were acquired at 3 min, 3 h, and 24 h after injection, and the activities for the whole body, urinary bladder, and soft tissue were measured by region-of-interest technique. From these data, bone uptake was calculated as initial whole-body activity minus urinary excretion and remainder soft-tissue activity. RESULTS:In animals treated with (153)Sm-EDTMP (n = 6), no differences could be proven for the bone uptake of (99m)Tc-HDP at 24 h after injection before and after therapy (51.1% +/- 5.5% vs. 48.0% +/- 6.1%, P > 0.05). There were also no significant differences for the remainder soft-tissue activities and the urinary excretion rates before and after therapy. Similar results were obtained in rabbits treated with (186)Re-HEDP: Bone uptake (44.8% +/- 6.7% vs. 40.4% +/- 4.9%, P > 0.05) and urinary excretion revealed no significant differences before and after treatment. CONCLUSION:No significant impairment of bone uptake of (99m)Tc-HDP could be observed 8 wk after high-dose radionuclide bone therapy. Because both the biokinetic data obtained for (186)Re-HEDP and (153)Sm-EDTMP and the myelotoxic effects were quite similar in rabbits to those in patients, it seems justifiable to expect the same result (i.e., no significant alteration of bone uptake of radiolabeled bisphosphonates) in patients undergoing a second radionuclide therapy within 2-3 mo after standard treatment with (186)Re-HEDP or (153)Sm-EDTMP.

The aim of this study is to investigate the myeloprotective effects of different amifostine regimens in rabbits undergoing high-dose treatment with 186Rhenium-(tin)1,1-hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate (186Re-HEDP) and to analyze the impact of amifostine on the bone uptake of the radiopharmaceutical. All animals were treated with 1000 MBq 186Re-HEDP. Group ReA received 500 mg amifostine prior to radionuclide therapy, group ReA3 received 3 x 200 mg amifostine 24 hours and 30 minutes prior to and 24 hours after radionuclide therapy. Group ReC served as control receiving no amifostine. Scintigrams were acquired to quantify the skeletal uptake of 186Re-HEDP, and platelet and leucocyte counts were measured. The mean decrease in platelets was 36% +/- 2%, 37% +/- 3%, and 61% +/- 5% for ReA, ReA3, and ReC, respectively. The decrease in ReC was significantly higher than in amifostine-treated animals with no difference between ReA and ReA3. For the leucocytes the mean decrease was 75% +/- 12%, 82% +/- 5%, and 73% +/- 4%, with no significant differences between the respective groups. Bone uptake of 186Re-HEDP was significantly reduced by 50% in ReA and ReA3 compared to ReC. Thus, the 3-day amifostine regimen had no advantage over the single dose regimen, with both regimens reducing bone uptake and yielding a platelet-protective but no leucoprotective effect.

UNLABELLED The aim of this experimental study was to investigate the myeloprotective potential of amifostine in rabbits receiving high-dose treatment with either (153)Sm-ethylenediaminetetramethylene phosphonate (EDTMP) or (186)Re-hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate (HEDP) and to check for drug interactions impairing the skeletal uptake of these radiopharmaceuticals by amifostine. METHODS To a total of 24 rabbits, we administered 1,000 MBq of either (153)Sm-EDTMP (n = 12) or (186)Re-HEDP (n = 12). Six animals of each group received 500 mg amifostine intravenously 10-15 min before injection of the radiopharmaceutical, whereas the other 6 animals served as controls. Up to 8 wk after treatment, blood samples were collected every 3-5 d to measure platelet and leukocyte counts. Furthermore, whole-body images were acquired at 3 min, 3 h, and 24 h after injection of the radiopharmaceutical to quantify the skeletal uptake. RESULTS For (186)Re-HEDP, the mean decrease in platelets was significantly less in the amifostine group (35.5% +/- 2.4%) than in the control group (61.3% +/- 5.4%, P < 0.001). Similar results were found for (153)Sm-EDTMP (36.5% +/- 8.3% vs. 52.3% +/- 14.0%, P < 0.05). No significant differences in leukocyte counts were found for (186)Re-HEDP (75.3% +/- 12.3% in the amifostine group and 72.5% +/- 4.1% in the control group, P > 0.05), whereas rabbits treated with (153)Sm-EDTMP plus amifostine showed a significantly greater decrease in leukocytes (69.2% +/- 10.8%) than did the control group (56.6% +/- 4.0%, P < 0.05). Bone uptake in percentage of initial total whole-body activity was significantly decreased in animals treated with amifostine compared with the control groups for both (186)Re-HEDP (15.8% +/- 3.1% vs. 30.9% +/- 1.9%, P < 0.001) and (153)Sm-EDTMP (31.7% +/- 8.9% vs. 44.0% +/- 6.5%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION For amifostine, we found a highly significant cytoprotective effect on platelets but no leukoprotective effect. The latter probably relies on the intrinsic myelotoxicity of high-dose amifostine, which seemed to potentiate the leukodepression of the radiopharmaceuticals. The lower bone uptake in amifostine-treated animals may be caused by the chemical structure of amifostine, which is a potentially complex-forming compound that may be able to displace bisphosphonates from the rhenium- and samarium-bisphosphonate complexes, resulting in altered biodistribution patterns.