OBJECTIVE The Society of Abdominal Radiology established a panel to prepare a consensus statement on the role of barium esophagography in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), as well as recommended techniques for performing the fluoroscopic examination and the gamut of findings associated with this condition. CONCLUSION Because it is an inexpensive, noninvasive, and widely available study that requires no sedation, barium esophagography may be performed as the initial test for GERD or in conjunction with other tests such as endoscopy.
Purpose To compare the diagnostic accuracy and image quality of computed tomographic (CT) enterographic images obtained at half dose and reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) with those of full-dose CT enterographic images reconstructed with FBP for active inflammatory terminal or neoterminal ileal Crohn disease. Materials and Methods This retrospective study was compliant with HIPAA and approved by the institutional review board. The requirement to obtain informed consent was waived. Ninety subjects (45 with active terminal ileal Crohn disease and 45 without Crohn disease) underwent CT enterography with a dual-source CT unit. The reference standard for confirmation of active Crohn disease was active terminal ileal Crohn disease based on ileocolonoscopy or established Crohn disease and imaging features of active terminal ileal Crohn disease. Data from both tubes were reconstructed with FBP (100% exposure); data from the primary tube (50% exposure) were reconstructed with FBP and SAFIRE strengths 3 and 4, yielding four datasets per CT enterographic examination. The mean volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) at full dose were 13.1 mGy (median, 7.36 mGy) and 15.9 mGy (median, 13.06 mGy), respectively, and those at half dose were 6.55 mGy (median, 3.68 mGy) and 7.95 mGy (median, 6.5 mGy). Images were subjectively evaluated by eight radiologists for quality and diagnostic confidence for Crohn disease. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were estimated, and the multireader, multicase analysis of variance method was used to compare reconstruction methods on the basis of a noninferiority margin of 0.05. Results The mean AUCs with half-dose scans (FBP, 0.908; SAFIRE 3, 0.935; SAFIRE 4, 0.924) were noninferior to the mean AUC with full-dose FBP scans (0.908; P < .003). The proportion of images with inferior quality was significantly higher with all half-dose reconstructions than with full-dose FBP (mean proportion: 0.117 for half-dose FBP, 0.054 for half-dose SAFIRE 3, 0.054 for half-dose SAFIRE 4, and 0.017 for full-dose FBP; P < .001). Conclusion The diagnostic accuracy of half-dose CT enterography with FBP and SAFIRE is statistically noninferior to that of full-dose CT enterography for active inflammatory terminal ileal Crohn disease, despite an inferior subjective image quality. (©) RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
The barium esophagram is an integral part of the assessment and management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) before, and especially after, antireflux procedures. While many of the findings on the examination can be identified with endosocopy, a gastric emptying study and an esophageal motility examination, the barium esophagram is better at demonstrating the anatomic findings after anti-reflux surgery, especially in symptomatic patients. These complementary examinations, when taken as a whole, fully evaluate a patient with suspected GERD as well as symptomatic patients after antireflux procedures.
The barium esophagram is an integral part of the assessment and management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) before, and especially after, antireflux procedures. While many of the findings on the examination can be identified with endosocopy, a gastric emptying study and an esophageal motility examination, the barium esophagram is better at demonstrating the anatomic findings after anti-reflux surgery, especially in symptomatic patients. These complementary examinations, when taken as a whole, fully evaluate a patient with suspected GERD as well as symptomatic patients after antireflux procedures.
OBJECTIVE The purpose of our study was to determine whether the MDCT enterography dose can be reduced by changing automatic exposure control (AEC) setting and quality reference milliampere-seconds (mAs) without altering subjective image quality or efficacy in active inflammatory Crohn's disease. SUBJECTS AND METHODS This is a prospective study of 2,310 MDCT enterography procedures performed using 16- and 64-MDCT in three cohorts (original, intermediate, and final dose levels). For 16-MDCT, the original and intermediate dose level quality reference mAs was 200, and weight-based (1 pound [0.45 kg] = 1 mAs) for the final dose level. For 64-MDCT, the original dose level quality reference mAs was 260; the mAs was 220 for intermediate and weight-based for the final dose level. For the intermediate and final dose levels, AEC was changed from strong to weak increase for obese and weak to strong decrease for slim patients. Demographic data and volume CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) were analyzed. Three readers evaluated the cases for image quality and efficacy differentiating normal from active inflammatory Crohn's disease. RESULTS For 16-MDCT, CTDI(vol) decreased from 12.82 to 10.14 mGy and 10.14 to 8.7 mGy between original to intermediate and intermediate to final dose levels. For 64-MDCT, the CTDI(vol) decreased from 15.72 to 11.42 mGy and 11.42 to 9.25 mGy between original to intermediate and intermediate to final dose levels. Images were rated suboptimal or nondiagnostic more often in the intermediate dose level (p < 0.05) but not in the final. There was no reduction in diagnostic efficacy as measured by area under the ROC curve (p > 0.1443 except for one comparison with one reader). CONCLUSION Substantial dose reduction can be achieved using weight-based quality reference mAs and altering AEC settings without affecting diagnostic efficacy in active inflammatory Crohn's disease of the terminal ileum. However, subjective image quality can be compromised at these dose settings, depending on radiologist preference.
OBJECTIVE:The purpose of our study was to measure relative and absolute wall attenuations and wall thickness in normal small bowel on contrast-enhanced CT enterography and to study the efficacy of relative attenuation, absolute attenuation, and wall thickness in distinguishing normal from active inflammatory Crohn's disease of the terminal ileum. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Using a case-control study design, we reviewed 630 CT enterography examinations, of which 191 were normal and 36 had active inflammatory Crohn's disease in the terminal ileum. In healthy individuals, wall thickness and attenuation in distended and collapsed loops were measured in the duodenum and four abdominal quadrants. Wall thickness and attenuation were also measured in the terminal ileum. All measurements of intraarterial attenuation were taken at the same slice level. In the examinations of patients with Crohn's disease, only terminal ileum wall thickness and attenuation as well as arterial attenuation at the same slice level were measured. Normal segments were compared with a linear model. Terminal ileum data were fit to a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS:Relative attenuation and absolute attenuation in the normal distended and collapsed duodenum and left upper quadrant were significantly greater than in all other segments (p < 0.001 and < 0.048 for relative attenuation and p < 0.001 and < 0.032 for absolute attenuation, respectively). Relative attenuation and wall thickness models and absolute attenuation and wall thickness models discriminated normal from active terminal ileum Crohn's disease significantly better than the same measurements without wall thickness (p = 0.017 and 0.001, respectively). When the bowel wall is > 3 mm, a relative attenuation cutoff of 0.5 is 89% sensitive and 81% specific. CONCLUSION:In normal small bowel, when wall measurement is taken into account, the duodenum and jejunum have a greater relative attenuation and absolute attenuation than other segments. Relative attenuation and absolute attenuation with wall thickness models discriminate normal from active terminal ileum Crohn's disease better than the same measurements without wall thickness.
In the last 5 years, computed tomography enterography (CTE) and to a lesser extent magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) have supplanted the routine small bowel series and enteroclysis in the evaluation of many small bowel diseases, especially Crohn's disease. Both CTE and MRE use similar methods of bowel lumen opacification and distension and both have distinct advantages and disadvantages. Both have been most extensively studied in patients with Crohn's disease. What is certain is that these cross-sectional examinations have largely replaced the historic fluoroscopic examinations in the evaluation of the small bowel.
Many of today's diagnostic imaging studies use intravenous contrast media to adequately evaluate disease processes. Although these agents are generally safe, their use poses some risks and, in some situations, is problematic. The risks include contrast-induced nephropathy.
PURPOSE To determine whether computer-aided detection (CAD) applied to computed tomographic (CT) colonography can help improve sensitivity of polyp detection by less-experienced radiologist readers, with colonoscopy or consensus used as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS The release of the CT colonographic studies was approved by the individual institutional review boards of each institution. Institutions from the United States were HIPAA compliant. Written informed consent was waived at all institutions. The CT colonographic studies in 30 patients from six institutions were collected; 24 images depicted at least one confirmed polyp 6 mm or larger (39 total polyps) and six depicted no polyps. By using an investigational software package, seven less-experienced readers from two institutions evaluated the CT colonographic images and marked or scored polyps by using a five-point scale before and after CAD. The time needed to interpret the CT colonographic findings without CAD and then to re-evaluate them with CAD was recorded. For each reader, the McNemar test, adjusted for clustered data, was used to compare sensitivities for readers without and with CAD; a Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to analyze the number of false-positive results per patient. RESULTS The average sensitivity of the seven readers for polyp detection was significantly improved with CAD-from 0.810 to 0.908 (P=.0152). The number of false-positive results per patient without and with CAD increased from 0.70 to 0.96 (95% confidence interval for the increase: -0.39, 0.91). The mean total time for the readings was 17 minutes 54 seconds; for interpretation of CT colonographic findings alone, the mean time was 14 minutes 16 seconds; and for review of CAD findings, the mean time was 3 minutes 38 seconds. CONCLUSION Results of this feasibility study suggest that CAD for CT colonography significantly improves per-polyp detection for less-experienced readers.
A 36-year-old woman presents to the emergency department with abdominal pain and intermittent nausea. You suspect that she has acute appendicitis. Which imaging test should you order to further evaluate this patient?
Purpose CT enterography (CTE) is a technique that provides detailed images of the small bowel by using a low Hounsfield unit oral contrast media. This study was designed to correlate CTE findings with operative findings in patients with Crohn’s disease. Methods We performed a retrospective study of all patients with Crohn’s disease of the small bowel or colon, who had CTE and subsequent small bowel or colon surgery within three months after the CT examination. CTE findings of stricture, fistula, inflammatory mass, abscess, and combinations of these abnormalities were compared with operative findings. Specialist radiologists and fellowship-trained colorectal surgeons participated in the study. The Fisher’s exact test or chi-squared tests were used with respect to categorical data, and the Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test was used for quantitative data. Results In 36 patients, the presence or absence of stricture, fistula, abscess, or inflammatory mass was correctly determined by CTE in 100, 94, 100, and 97 percent, respectively. The accuracy for stricture or fistula number was 83 and 86 percent, respectively. There were nine patients with multiple disease phenotypes identified on CTE of which eight were confirmed at surgery. CTE overestimated or underestimated the extent of disease in 11 patients (31 percent). Conclusions CTE is an accurate preoperative diagnostic imaging study for small-bowel Crohn’s disease. The ability of this imaging study to detect both luminal and extraluminal pathology is a distinct advantage of CTE compared with small-bowel contrast studies.
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common medical problem in the United States. As a result, laparoscopic antireflux surgery is a common surgical procedure. At the authors' institution, the barium esophagram before and after antireflux surgery is a critical examination in patients with GERD. This article summarizes the authors' examination protocol and describes how the findings are integrated in the care of these patients.
Exposure to ionizing radiation during diagnostic radio-logic procedures carries small but real risks, and children, young adults, and pregnant women are especially vulnerable. Exposure of patients to diagnostic energy levels of ionizing radiation should be kept to the minimum necessary to provide useful clinical information and allay patients' concerns about radiation-related risks.
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is defined as gastroesophageal reflux resulting in symptoms or in injury to the esophageal epithelium. Although the medical management of GERD has improved, an increasing number of laparoscopic antireflux surgical procedures are being performed. Barium studies, endoscopy, manometry, and pH monitoring are all integral components of preoperative evaluation. Barium swallow examination must allow critical evaluation of esophageal peristalsis, the presence and extent of gastroesophageal reflux, and complications including esophagitis, stricture, and Barrett esophagus. It is crucial to identify and characterize hiatal hernia and longitudinal stricture, which can result in a shortened esophagus. In such cases, it becomes necessary for the surgeon to incorporate an esophageal lengthening procedure prior to fundoplication; otherwise, poor surgical outcome is likely. Normal postfundoplication radiographic findings as well as postoperative complications (eg, tight wrap, perforation, abscess, complete or partial dehiscence, recurrent stricture, recurrent hernia, intrathoracic migration of the wrap) must also be recognized and clearly understood by the radiologist. Given the chronic nature and prevalence of symptomatic GERD and the increasing number of patients undergoing surgical intervention, it is imperative that the radiologist understand the pre- and postsurgical evaluation of affected patients.
Each article begins with an actual case and focuses on how imaging should be used to establish or exclude a particular diagnosis, with emphasis on the care of the patient.
With all of the imaging options, which is the best way to assess for renal calculi in the acute setting?
To determine the current indications and referral patterns for routine gastrointestinal radiology examinations, 1000 consecutive patients were prospectively analyzed. The following specialties were the largest sources of referral: general internal medicine (38%), gastroenterology (21%), and general and colorectal surgery (17%). Referrals from gastroenterologists were weighted toward areas not well evaluated by endoscopy, such as suspected small bowel disease. The major indications for upper gastrointestinal (GI) examinations were dysphagia and swallowing disorders (32%), hiatus hernia/reflux (14%), and ulcer (14%). Small bowel series were predominantly performed for inflammatory bowel disease (37%), obstruction (25%), and occult blood loss (18%). The majority of combined upper GI/small bowel studies were performed for indications primarily relating to the small bowel. Forty percent of barium enemas were performed for detection of neoplasms and polyps, with pain/irritable colon (14%) and exclusion of leak (14%) the next most common indications. Traditional indications, such as peptic ulcer disease and neoplastic disease, continue to be sources of referral for gastrointestinal radiology. However, more specialized applications, particularly in areas not well suited to endoscopy, such as swallowing disorders, inflammatory disease of the small bowel, and evaluation of surgical anastomoses, are also being commonly used. The changing indications, along with the previously documented decreased volume of gastrointestinal radiologic procedures, should be kept in mind when planning a radiology resident educational curriculum.