Key Points Employment status and insurance type consistently affected graft survival in KT, whereas the influence of education level varied over time post-transplant. The area deprivation index was linked to graft failure in KT from the early to the long-term post-transplantation period. Follow-up strategies to optimize long-term KT outcomes should address socioeconomic factors at both individual and area levels. Background Socioeconomic status is recognized as a factor influencing graft survival in adult kidney transplantation (KT). However, limited research has examined whether socioeconomic factors influence transplant outcomes differently across post-transplantation periods. We evaluated the longitudinal impact of socioeconomic factors on graft failure post-KT over time. Methods Adult KT alone performed from 2003 to 2013 were evaluated using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database. The period of post-transplantation was divided into three categories, and the outcome of each group is as follows; group 1: graft failure within 1 year in all patients, group 2: graft failure within 5 years in 1-year graft survivors, and group 3: graft failure within 10 years in 5-year graft survivors. We explored the influence of socioeconomic factors on outcomes in living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) and deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT), separately. Socioeconomic factors included patient education level, employment status at transplantation, insurance status, and area deprivation index (ADI). Higher ADI scores represent greater socioeconomic deprivation. Results In total, 153,660 adult KT were performed from 2003 to 2013 (group 1), of which 140,699 recipients survived at 1 year (group 2) and 106,238 recipients survived at 5 years (group 3) post-transplantation. While employment status and insurance status consistently influenced graft failure over time, the impact of education level was time-dependent. High school education was associated with a high risk of graft failure, compared with post-college education only in the later post-transplantation periods (group 3) for both DDKT (hazard ratio, 1.09; P = 0.025) and LDKT (hazard ratio, 1.26; P < 0.001), but not in the early period (group 1). ADI-based analysis showed that recipients from highly deprived areas had worse post-transplantation outcomes across all periods in both DDKT and LDKT. Conclusions The impact of individual-level socioeconomic factors on post-KT outcomes varied over time. Socioeconomically disadvantaged patients had an increased risk of graft failure from the early to the long-term post-KT period. To optimize long-term outcomes, follow-up strategies should incorporate both individual-level and area-level socioeconomic factors.

Machine perfusion (MP) use for both organs can increase organ usage in simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation (SLKT). We analyzed 6,956 SLKT performed between 2015 and 2024 using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. The primary outcomes were the 1-year graft survival for kidney and liver. Donor types and MP use for liver and/or kidney were captured and associations with outcomes were evaluated. SLKT from Donation after circulatory death donors (DCD) increased from 4.5% in 2015 to 16% in 2023. The median Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) has increased from 23% in 2015 to 28% in 2023. MP use for kidney and liver also increased from 21% to 51% and 0%-17%, respectively. KDPI >85% was an independent risk factor of 1-year kidney graft failure in the no kidney MP group [HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.20-3.44, p = 0.009], but not in the kidney MP group. DCD was found to be an independent risk factor of 1-year liver graft failure in the no liver MP group [HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.19-2.03, p = 0.001], but not in the liver MP group. MP for both organs may contribute to expanding the donor pool for SLKT without compromising post-transplant outcomes.

Background. In 2019, Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing changed the exception policy for liver allocation to the median model for end-stage liver disease at transplantation (MMaT). This study evaluated the effects of this change on-waitlist outcomes of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) for patients with polycystic liver-kidney disease (PLKD). Methods. Using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing registry, 317 patients with PLKD listed for SLKT between January 2016 and December 2021 were evaluated. Waitlist outcomes were compared between prepolicy (Era 1) and postpolicy (Era 2) eras. Results. One-year transplant probability was significantly higher in Era 2 than in Era 1 (55.7% versus 37.9%; P = 0.001), and the positive effect on transplant probability of Era 2 was significant after risk adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-2.54; P = 0.002 [ref. Era 1]), whereas waitlist mortality was comparable. Transplant centers were separated into the high and low MMaT groups with a score of 29 (median MMaT) and transplant probability in each group between eras was compared. In the high MMaT transplant centers, the 1-y transplant probability was significantly higher in Era 2 (27.5% versus 52.4%; P = 0.003). The positive effect remained significant in the high MMaT center group (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.43-5.46; P = 0.003 [ref. Era 1]) but not in the low MMaT center group. Although there was a difference between center groups in Era 1 (P = 0.006), it became comparable in Era 2 (P = 0.54). Conclusions. The new policy increased 1-y SLKT probability in patients with PKLD and successfully reduced the disparities based on center location.

BKV and BKVN are common in pediatric kidney transplant, but there is limited data on treatment approaches. Our objective was to study the prevalence of BKV and BKVN utilizing only plasma qPCR and report treatment outcomes with stepwise IR and IVIG.

Introduction: An outstanding question in kidney transplantation is how to prepare candidates and their social supports for optimal posttransplant outcomes. Project Aims: This program evaluation assessed whether a pretransplant quality improvement clinic improved clinical outcomes in the year posttransplant compared to recipients receiving standard of care. Design: The Countdown to Transplant Clinic was implemented with kidney transplant candidates expected to receive a transplant within the next few months. The clinic included an enhanced education session on posttransplant lifestyle management, confirmation of support (≥2 adults), and evaluations by transplant social work, psychology, and nephrology. Results: Seventy-five patients participated in the clinic and underwent a transplant. A retrospective chart review of posttransplant laboratory values, rehospitalizations (within 3-months posttransplant), biopsy-confirmed graft failure, and mortality (within 1-year posttransplant) were collected from both groups. Univariate and multivariate propensity score-weighted linear or logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between clinic participation and outcomes. In models adjusting for relevant covariates, participation in The Countdown to Transplant Clinic (vs standard care) was associated with a lower coefficient of variation of serum tacrolimus (all values collected 3-12 months posttransplant), 30-day posttransplant white blood cell counts (but not 90-day), 90-day posttransplant potassium, and 30 and 31 to 90 days rehospitalizations. Clinic participation did not predict serum glucose levels at 30- or 90-days posttransplant. Due to low rates of rejection and mortality, meaningful comparisons were not possible. Conclusion: Participation in a pretransplant, multicomponent clinic may improve certain outcomes of interest posttransplantation. Pilot testing for feasibility for randomized controlled trials is a necessary next step.

Objective: To investigate the incidence and characteristics of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in kidney transplantation recipients and analyze whether the anatomical side of DVT was associated with the side of the transplanted organ. Methods: A single-center retrospective medical record review of patients who received a kidney transplant between January 2004 and July 2019 and who subsequently developed DVT. Only patients who received unilateral kidney transplants were included in the study. Patients who underwent concomitant pancreatic transplants, bilateral kidney transplants, or repeat procedures were excluded. Results: Of the 2449 kidney transplants performed during the study period, 1482 were included in the analysis (948 men 164%j; mean age 61 years). Of 606 duplex ultrasound tests, 115 results confirmed the presence of DVT. The incidence of symptomatic DVT was 4.7%. The most common time of DVT diagnosis was within four weeks after transplantation. Type 2 diabetes, heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, sepsis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/abnormal pulmonary function, and being confined to bed were associated with DVT after kidney transplant (all P < 0.05). Patients with ultrasound-confirmed DVT had higher mean Caprini scores than patients with negative duplex ultrasounds (P < 0.5). Approximately 53% of transplant patients with ultrasound-confirmed DVT had a 1:1 correlation of transplant side to the side of DVT. Cohen kappa statistic 0.03 indicated no correlation between the side of DVT and the side of transplant. Conclusions: The incidence of DVT after kidney transplant was lower than the incidence reported in the literature. Being confined to a bed may be a risk factor for DVT after transplant surgery. Kidney transplant recipients who had a positive duplex ultrasound had higher Caprini risk assessment scores than transplant recipients who had negative duplex ultrasounds. There was no correlation between the side of the DVT and the side of the transplant.

Histologic findings on 1-year biopsies such as inflammation with fibrosis and transplant glomerulopathy predict renal allograft loss by 5 years. However, almost half of the patients with graft loss have a 1-year biopsy that is either normal or has only interstitial fibrosis. The goal of this study was to determine if there was a gene expression profile in these relatively normal 1-year biopsies that predicted subsequent decline in renal function. Using transcriptome microarrays we measured intragraft mRNA levels in a retrospective Discovery cohort (170 patients with a normal/minimal fibrosis 1-year biopsy, 54 with progressive decline in function/graft loss and 116 with stable function) and developed a nested 10-fold cross-validated gene classifier that predicted progressive decline in renal function (positive predictive value = 38 +/- 34%%; negative predictive value = 73 +/- 30%, c-statistic = .59). In a prospective, multicenter Validation cohort (270 patients with Normal/Interstitial Fibrosis [IF]), the classifier had a 20% positive predictive value, 85% negative predictive value and .58 c-statistic. Importantly, the majority of patients with graft loss in the prospective study had 1-year biopsies scored as Normal or IF. We conclude predicting graft loss in many renal allograft recipients (i.e., those with a relatively normal 1-year biopsy and eGFR > 40) remains difficult.

OBJECTIVE To describe the use of robotic-assisted transplant ureteral repair (RATUR) for treating transplant ureteral stricture (TUS) in 3 patients who had undergone robot assisted kidney transplant (RAKT). METHOD We reviewed the medical records of 3 patients who experienced TUS after RAKT and who underwent RATUR between 2017 and 2020. The patients' RAKT, post-transplant clinical course, endourological interventions, reoperation, and recovery were assessed. RESULTS All patients diagnosed with TUS presented with deterioration of kidney function after RAKT. Method of diagnosis included ultrasound, antegrade ureterogram, and CT scan. All 3 patients had a short (<1 cm) area of TUS and underwent RATUR. For 2 patients, distal strictures were bypassed with modified Lich-Gregoir ureteroneocystostomy reimplantation. One patient was treated with pyelo-ureterostomy to the contralateral native ureter. No intraoperative complications, conversions to open surgery, or significant operative blood loss requiring blood transfusion for any patient were observed. Also, no patients had urine leaks in the immediate or late postoperative period. After RATUR, 2 patients developed Clavien grade II complications with rectus hematoma or urinary tract infection. CONCLUSION RATUR is a technically feasible operation for kidney transplant patients with TUS after RAKT. This procedure may provide the same benefits of open operation without promoting certain comorbidities that may occur from open surgical procedures. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc.

OBJECTIVES:In TRANSFORM, de novo kidney transplant recipients received either everolimus in combination with reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor (EVR+rCNI) at standard EVR pre-dose concentrations of 3-8 ng/mL or mycophenolic acid plus standard-exposure CNI (MPA+sCNI). The authors analyzed the incidence of wound healing adverse events (WHAEs) over the 2-year study period 15. METHODS:Patients were randomized to either EVR+rCNI or MPA+sCNI, both combined with induction therapy and steroids 19. RESULTS:The safety population consisted of 2,026 patients (EVR+rCNI: 1,014, MPA+sCNI: 1,012). The proportion of patients with at least 1 WHAE was comparable between EVR+rCNI and MPA+sCNI treatment groups [20.6% vs. 17.3%; risk ratio (RR): 1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99, 1.43] at month 24. The numerical difference between EVR+rCNI and MPA+sCNI was mainly caused by an increased proportion of EVR patients with lymphocele and wound dehiscence [7.5% vs. 5.1% (RR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.04, 2.05) and 3.9% vs. 1.8% (RR: 2.22; 95%CI: 1.28, 3.84), respectively] 20. CONCLUSION:The immediate introduction of EVR+rCNI after kidney transplantation was associated with an overall comparable incidence of WHAEs versus current standard-of-care over the 24-month study period. There was an increased relative risk of experiencing lymphocele and wound dehiscence but the absolute risks were rather low in both groups 21. CT.GOV IDENTIFIER:NCT01950819.

Background. The safety profiles of standard therapy versus everolimus with reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy using contemporary protocols in de novo kidney transplant recipients have not been compared in detail. Methods. TRANSFORM was a randomized, international trial in which de novo kidney transplant patients were randomized to everolimus with reduced-exposure CNI (N = 1014) or mycophenolic acid (MPA) with standard-exposure CNI (N = 1012), both with induction and corticosteroids. Results. Within the safety population (everolimus 1014, MPA 1012), adverse events with a suspected relation to study drug occurred in 62.9% versus 59.2% of patients given everolimus or MPA, respectively (P = 0.085). Hyperlipidemia, interstitial lung disease, peripheral edema, proteinuria, stomatitis/mouth ulceration, thrombocytopenia, and wound healing complications were more frequent with everolimus, whereas diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, leukopenia, tremor, and insomnia were more frequent in the MPA group. The incidence of viral infections (17.2% versus 29.2%; P < 0.001), cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections (8.1% versus 20.1%; P < 0.001), CMV syndrome (13.6% versus 23.0%, P = 0.044), and BK virus (BKV) infections (4.3% versus 8.0%, P < 0.001) were less frequent with everolimus. CMV infection was less common with everolimus versus MPA after adjusting for prophylaxis therapy in the D+/R- subgroup (P < 0.001). Study drug was discontinued more frequently due to rejection or impaired healing with everolimus, and more often due to BKV infection or BKV nephropathy with MPA. Conclusions. De novo everolimus with reduced-exposure CNI yielded a comparable incidence, though a distinctly different pattern, of adverse events versus current standard of care. Both regimens are safe and effective, yet their distinct profiles may enable tailoring for individual kidney transplant recipients.