Treatment of intracranial aneurysm with flow-diverting devices has become widespread in recent years. Despite that, intra-aneurysmal flow changes are yet not fully understood and can lead to different complications. Our aim was an in vitro contrast-based evaluation of the influence of flow diverter size and position on intra-aneurysmal flow dynamics.

Flow diverters are increasingly being used to treat intracranial aneurysms. This study evaluates occurring complications of flow-diverting devices in the treatment of experimental aneurysms, involving the use of micro-CT and small animal MRI at 9.4 T, in correlation to angiographic and histological findings.

In recent years, flow diverters have provided a promising alternative to treat complex intracranial aneurysms. In this study, we compare a second-generation flow-diverting device (Derivo Embolization Device) with its prototype flow diverter, in the treatment of elastase-induced aneurysms in New Zealand white rabbits.

Introduction In this study, we analyzed angiographic and histologic aneurysm occlusion of a newly designed flow-diverting device. Visibility and flexibility, as well as occlusions of side branches and neointimal proliferation were also evaluated. Methods Aneurysms were induced in 18 New Zealand white rabbits and treated with a braided, “closed-loop-designed” device of nitinol. Additional devices were implanted in the abdominal aorta to cover the origin of branch arteries. Angiographic follow-ups were performed immediately after placement of the device, after 3 months ( n = 9) and 6 months ( n = 9). The status of aneurysm occlusion (using a five-point scale) and the patency of branch arteries were assessed. Results Aneurysm occlusion rates were noted as grade 0 in 2 (11 %), grade I in 1 (6 %), grade II in 1 (6 %), grade III in 9 (50 %), and grade IV in 5 (28 %) of 18 aneurysms, respectively, indicating a complete or near-complete occlusion of 78 % under double antiplatelet therapy. Aneurysm occlusion was significantly higher at 6 months follow-up ( P = 0.025). Radiopaque markers provided excellent visibility. Limited device flexibility led to incomplete aneurysm neck coverage and grade 0 occlusion rates in two cases. Distal device occlusions were found in three cases, most likely due to an extremely undersized vessel diameter in the subclavian artery. No case of branch artery occlusion was seen. Intimal proliferation and diameter stenosis were moderate. Conclusion The tested flow diverter achieved near-complete and complete aneurysm occlusion under double antiplatelet therapy of elastase-induced aneurysms in 78 %, while preserving branch arteries.