Abstract Introduction Cell-based therapies using lipoaspirate are gaining popularity within surgical fields due to their hypothesised regenerative potential. Several point-of-care lipoaspirate-processing devices have become available to isolate cells for therapeutic use, with published evidence reporting their clinical relevance. However, few studies have analysed the composition of their minimally manipulated cellular products, information that is vital to understand the mechanisms by which these therapies may be efficacious. This review aimed to identify devices using mechanical-only processing of lipoaspirate, their cell yields, viability, phenotype and where available clinical outcomes. Methods MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed databases were systematically searched on 01/09/21 using relevant keywords. PRISMA guidelines were followed (PROSPERO#CRD42021282041), and level of evidence was assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine guidelines. Information was extracted and analysed to summarise the cellular composition derived from these devices and their clinical outcomes. Results 2895 studies were screened and a total of 15 articles (11=Level 5 evidence) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Overall, 13 devices were identified. All the studies reported cell yield for their devices (range 0.005–21×106). 10 reported viability (range 60–98%), 11 performed immuno-phenotypic analysis of the cell-subtypes and 4 investigated clinical outcomes of their cellular products. Only 2 studies reported all four parameters. Conclusion Although many devices are available to mechanically process lipoaspirate, few have published peer-reviewed literature of their products’ composition. Significant heterogeneity in the reporting of these studies makes it difficult to summarise their clinical potential. This review is unable to make any recommendations on the clinical use of these devices. Take-home message Many point-of-care devices have become available to mechanically process lipoaspirate to form a cellular product for therapeutic use in surgery. However, few have publications on their products’ composition which is information required to understand the mechanisms by which these therapies may be efficacious.

Abstract Introduction Total hip and knee arthroplasty are common orthopaedic procedures that require post-operative radiographs to confirm implant positioning and identify complications. Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has the potential to automate image analysis. This systematic review reports on how AI-based technologies are currently being used and their accuracy in image analysis following THA and TKA. Methods EMBASE, Medline and PubMed libraries were systematically searched for articles published until 15/09/2021 using terms related to “x-ray analysis”, “total hip/knee arthroplasty”, and “AI”. The review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO#CRD42021276876). Study quality was assessed using a modified MINORS tool. AI performance was reported using the area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy. Results Of the 455 studies identified, 12 were included: nine reported implant identification, three described prediction of implant failure and three compared AI performance with orthopaedic surgeons. AI-based implant identification was precise (AUC 0.992–1) and most algorithms reported accuracy >90%. Two of these studies reported AI performance to be similar or superior to human experts. AI prediction of dislocation risk following THA was acceptable (AUC 76.67), diagnosis of hip implant loosening was good (accuracy 88.3%) and measurement of acetabular angles on post-operative x-rays was comparable to humans (Cohen's kappa 0.76–1.00). Conclusion AI technology can be trained to identify implant models on post-operative x-rays with a performance that is comparable to that of human experts. However, the technology requires further development to enable analysis of other post-operative radiographic features following arthroplasty surgery that could improve patient care. Take-home message Artificial intelligence image analysis through deep learning can classify hip and knee implants, and measure malposition and detect features of loosening of hip implants.

of the systematic review were to assess the sensitising potential of TKA, explore the relationship between Nickel hypersensitivity and clinical outcomes, and evaluate the utility of skin patch testing pre- and/or post-operatively. A literature search was performed through EMBASE, Medline and PubMed databases. Articles were screened independently by two authors. Levels of Evidence were assessed using OCEBM criteria, and quality assessed using MINORS and Cochrane risk-of-bias tools. Twenty studies met the eligibility criteria, reporting on 1354 knee arthroplasties. Prevalence of Nickel hypersensitivity ranged from 0% to 87.5%. Only one study which compared prevalence of hypersensitivity in the same patient group before and after surgery noted newly positive patch test reactions in 4.1%. Three studies reported lower prevalence of hypersensitivity in post-operative patients compared to pre-operative patients. Seven studies suggested hypersensitivity might cause complications; six studies did not support any relationship. Seven studies recommended pre-operative patch testing in patients with history of metal allergy; nine studies concluded testing may be valuable post-operatively. Patients undergoing TKA do not seem to be at increased risk of developing Nickel hypersensitivity, however there is conflicting evidence that patients with established hypersensitivity are more likely to experience adverse clinical outcomes. Patch testing remains the gold standard diagnostic method; evidence suggests performing this test pre-operatively in patients with history of metal allergy to aid selection of the most appropriate prosthesis, and postoperatively once common causes of implant failure have been excluded, since implant removal or revision with hypoallergenic implants may alleviate symptoms. Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty do not seem to be at an increased risk of developing nickel hypersensitivity, and there is mixed evidence that patients with hypersensitivity are more likely to experience adverse clinical outcomes. Evidence suggests performing patch testing preoperatively in patients with a history of metal allergy to aid selection of the most appropriate prosthesis, and post-operatively only once more common causes of implant failure have been excluded.

Abstract Introduction NHS England generates over 20 million tonnes of CO2 per year, representing 4% of the nation's greenhouse gas emissions. One third of all hospital waste comes from operating theatres. Our aim was to investigate the degree of knowledge of sustainable waste segregation amongst theatre staff in an elective orthopaedic centre and identify ways to improve their waste segregation practice. Methods Over a one-week period, 20 randomly selected theatre staff of different roles, completed a questionnaire asking them which disposal bin 11 commonly used orthopaedic theatre items should be placed in – general waste or recycling. After initial data collection, posters specifically identifying recyclable items were created and displayed in each operating theatre. Following this intervention, data was re-collected from another 20 randomly selected theatre staff using the same questionnaire. Results Results from the initial questionnaire showed general waste and recyclable items were correctly identified by staff in 65% (78/120 responses) and 59% (59/100 responses), respectively. Following the educational intervention, the percentage of correct responses increased to 68.3% (82/120 responses) and 85% (85/100 responses); i.e. staff knowledge of what can go into a recycling bin improved by 36%. Conclusion Educating staff by placing posters in the operating theatre can improve knowledge of what orthopaedic theatre items can be recycled and is a simple and effective way of producing sustainable change in surgery. Guiding and empowering individuals to exercise sustainable practice in the operating theatre will help the NHS to overcome the significant challenge of achieving net zero carbon by 2045. Take-home message Educating staff by placing posters in the operating theatre is a simple and effective way of improving waste segregation practice and will help the health service to overcome the significant challenge of achieving net zero carbon.

Abstract Aim End-stage arthropathy is a well-known complication of haemophilia, with recurrent haemarthroses leading to joint destruction, deformity, pain, and stiffness. In the knee, this is often treated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which can be more challenging in patients with haemophilia (PwH) and associated with poorer outcomes. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to determine implant survivorship, functional outcomes, and complication rates. Method A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed for studies reporting TKA outcomes with Kaplan-Meier survivorship in PwH (PROSPERO registered). Meta-analysis was performed for survivorship and outcomes, and the results were compared to outcomes from the National Joint Registry (NJR). Results 19 studies, totalling 1187 TKAs (average age 39 years) were reviewed. In PwH, implant survivorship at 5, 10, and 15 years was 94%, 86%, and 76% respectively, whereas NJR reported survivorship for males <55 years was 94%, 90%, and 86%. Survivorship generally improved over the time period studied (1973–2017) but was inversely correlated with HIV infection (common in PwH). Range of motion improved by 10–20° post-operatively, and there were large improvements in Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS). The prosthetic joint infection rate (PJI) was 6% compared to 0.5–1% in non-PwH, but the reporting of other complications, especially haematological, was inconsistent. Conclusions TKA in PwH has similar 5-year survivorship to non-PwH, but a six-fold higher infection rate. There were marked improvements in range of motion and PROMS, but complications were poorly reported. There remains a need for larger, long-term studies with standardised reporting.