Introduction: Research suggests that neighborhood-level factors are associated with long-term health; however, there is a dearth of research evaluating this association among patients (pts) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), a population that is usually optimally treated with respect to long-term risk management. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that pts living in the most disadvantaged areas have a higher risk of post-discharge mortality after PCI compared with pts not living in the most disadvantaged areas. Methods: Using a clinical registry of pts with valid zip codes who underwent PCI between 1/2013 - 3/2018 at 47 Michigan hospitals linked to Medicare claims, we compared long-term outcomes between pts in the highest ADI decile (i.e. most disadvantaged) with the remainder. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is a zip-code-level composite measure of neighborhood disadvantage. Unadjusted mortality was depicted on a Kaplan-Meier plot. We used a Cox model to assess the association between the ADI and mortality after adjusting for pt factors. Results: Among 26,164 pts, 9.9% lived in the most disadvantaged zip codes and were more likely to be younger, of black race, have both Medicare and Medicaid insurance, and have more cardiovascular comorbidities. Unadjusted rates of mortality were higher among pts living in the most disadvantaged areas compared with the remainder (5-yr mortality: 64.5% vs 70.9%; Fig). After adjusting for pt factors, those living in the most disadvantaged areas had a significantly increased risk of long-term mortality (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.08 - 1.25), a risk equivalent to an 8% reduction in one’s ejection fraction (HR for 8% EF reduction: 1.16; 95% CI 1.14 - 1.17). Conclusions: Medicare pts living in the most disadvantaged areas have a higher risk of post-PCI long-term mortality compared with the remainder. Policies targeting the deleterious health effects of neighborhood disadvantage and social risk are needed to improve survival after PCI.