Forisomes are protein bodies known exclusively from sieve elements of legumes. Forisomes contribute to the regulation of phloem transport due to their unique Ca2+-controlled, reversible swelling. The assembly of forisomes from sieve element occlusion (SEO) protein monomers in developing sieve elements and the mechanism(s) of Ca2+-dependent forisome contractility are poorly understood because the amino acid sequences of SEO proteins lack conventional protein-protein interaction and Ca2+-binding motifs. We selected amino acids potentially responsible for forisome-specific functions by analyzing SEO protein sequences in comparison to those of the widely distributed SEO-related (SEOR), or SEOR proteins. SEOR proteins resemble SEO proteins closely but lack any Ca2+ responsiveness. We exchanged identified candidate residues by directed mutagenesis of the Medicago truncatula SEO1 gene, expressed the mutated genes in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and studied the structural and functional phenotypes of the forisome-like bodies that formed in the transgenic cells. We identified three aspartate residues critical for Ca2+ responsiveness and two more that were required for forisome-like bodies to assemble. The phenotypes observed further suggested that Ca2+-controlled and pH-inducible swelling effects in forisome-like bodies proceeded by different yet interacting mechanisms. Finally, we observed a previously unknown surface striation in native forisomes and in recombinant forisome-like bodies that could serve as an indicator of successful forisome assembly. To conclude, this study defines a promising path to the elucidation of the so-far elusive molecular mechanisms of forisome assembly and Ca2+-dependent contractility.

Journal Article Investigation of Structure-Function Relationship of Long-Distance Transport in Plants: New Imaging Tools to Answer Old Questions Get access Daniel L Mullendore, Daniel L Mullendore Plant Cell Biology Lab, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman WA Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Daniel R Froelich, Daniel R Froelich Plant Cell Biology Lab, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman WA Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Sierra Beecher, Sierra Beecher Plant Cell Biology Lab, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman WA Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Tim J Ross-Elliott, Tim J Ross-Elliott Plant Cell Biology Lab, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman WA Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Jan Knoblauch, Jan Knoblauch Plant Cell Biology Lab, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman WA Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Michael Knoblauch Michael Knoblauch Plant Cell Biology Lab, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman WA Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Microscopy and Microanalysis, Volume 21, Issue S3, 1 August 2015, Pages 1491–1492, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927615008235 Published: 23 September 2015

The phloem provides a network of sieve tubes for long-distance translocation of photosynthates. For over a century, structural proteins in sieve tubes have presented a conundrum since they presumably increase the hydraulic resistance of the tubes while no potential function other than sieve tube or wound sealing in the case of injury has been suggested. Here we summarize and critically evaluate current speculations regarding the roles of these proteins. Our understanding suffers from the suggestive power of images; what looks like a sieve tube plug on micrographs may not actually impede translocation very much. Recent reports of an involvement of SEOR (sieve element occlusion-related) proteins, a class of P-proteins, in the sealing of injured sieve tubes are inconclusive; various lines of evidence suggest that, in neither intact nor injured plants, are SEORs determinative of translocation stoppage. Similarly, the popular notion that P-proteins serve in the defence against phloem sap-feeding insects is unsupported by empirical facts; it is conceivable that in functional sieve tubes, aphids actually could benefit from inducing a plug. The idea that rising cytosolic Ca(2+) generally triggers sieve tube blockage by P-proteins appears widely accepted, despite lacking experimental support. Even in forisomes, P-protein assemblages restricted to one single plant family and the only Ca(2+)-responsive P-proteins known, the available evidence does not unequivocally suggest that plug formation is the cause rather than a consequence of translocation stoppage. We conclude that the physiological roles of structural P-proteins remain elusive, and that in vivo studies of their dynamics in continuous sieve tube networks combined with flow velocity measurements will be required to (hopefully) resolve this scientific roadblock.

The structure-function relationship of proteinaceous filaments in sieve elements has long been a source of investigation in order to understand their role in the biology of the phloem. Two phloem filament proteins AtSEOR1 (At3g01680.1) and AtSEOR2 (At3g01670.1) in Arabidopsis have been identified that are required for filament formation. Immunolocalization experiments using a phloem filament-specific monoclonal antibody in the respective T-DNA insertion mutants provided an initial indication that both proteins are necessary to form phloem filaments. To investigate the relationship between these two proteins further, green fluorescent protein (GFP)-AtSEO fusion proteins were expressed in Columbia wild-type and T-DNA insertion mutants. Analysis of these mutants by confocal microscopy confirmed that phloem filaments could only be detected in the presence of both proteins, indicating that despite significant sequence homology the proteins are not functionally redundant. Individual phloem filament protein subunits of AtSEOR1 and AtSEOR2 were capable of forming homodimers, but not heterodimers in a yeast two-hybrid system. The absence of phloem filaments in phloem sieve elements did not result in gross alterations of plant phenotype or affect basal resistance to green peach aphid (Myzus persicae).

Since the first ultrastructural investigations of sieve tubes in the early 1960s, their structure has been a matter of debate. Because sieve tube structure defines frictional interactions in the tube system, the presence of P protein obstructions shown in many transmission electron micrographs led to a discussion about the mode of phloem transport. At present, it is generally agreed that P protein agglomerations are preparation artifacts due to injury, the lumen of sieve tubes is free of obstructions, and phloem flow is driven by an osmotically generated pressure differential according to Munch's classical hypothesis. Here, we show that the phloem contains a distinctive network of protein filaments. Stable transgenic lines expressing Arabidopsis thaliana Sieve-Element-Occlusion-Related1 (SEOR1)-yellow fluorescent protein fusions show that At SEOR1 meshworks at the margins and clots in the lumen are a general feature of living sieve tubes. Live imaging of phloem flow and flow velocity measurements in individual tubes indicate that At SEOR1 agglomerations do not markedly affect or alter flow. A transmission electron microscopy preparation protocol has been generated showing sieve tube ultrastructure of unprecedented quality. A reconstruction of sieve tube ultrastructure served as basis for tube resistance calculations. The impact of agglomerations on phloem flow is discussed.