BIOCHEMISTRY. For the article ‘‘Scanning the human proteome for calmodulin-binding proteins,’’ by Xinchun Shen, C. Alexander Valencia, Jack Szostak, Biao Dong, and Rihe Liu, which appeared in issue 17, April 26, 2005, of Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (102, 5969–5974; first published April 19, 2005; 10.1073 pnas.0407928102), the author name Jack Szostak should have appeared as Jack W. Szostak. The online version has been corrected. The corrected author line appears below.

Purpose: To assess the efficacy and toxicity of KRN8602 when administered as an intravenous bolus to patients with recurrent high-grade malignant glioma. Patients and Methods: Patients with recurrent or persistent anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma multiforme who had not received recent chemotherapy or radiotherapy and were of good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score I 2) were treated with an intravenous bolus of 40 mg/m2 KRN8602 every 28 days. Tumor responses were assessed radiologically and clinically after every second cycle of therapy. Treatment was continued until documented progression or a total of six cycles. Results: A median of three cycles (range, one to six cycles) of KRN8602 was administered to 55 patients, 49 of whom received at least two cycles and were, therefore, assessable for response. The overall response rate (disease stabilization or better) was 43% (95% confidence interval, 29% to 58%). There were three complete responses, one partial response, seven minor responses, and 10 patients with stable disease. The median time to progression was 2 months (range, 1.5 to 37 months) and overall survival was 11 months (range, 1.5 to 40 months). Neutropenia was the most common toxicity, although it was generally of brief duration, and there were only seven episodes of febrile neutropenia in 176 cycles delivered. Nonhematologic toxicity was mostly gastrointestinal (nausea and vomiting, diarrhea) and events were grade 2 or lower except for a single episode of grade 3 vomiting. Conclusion: KRN8602 is an active new agent with minimal toxicity in the treatment of relapsed or refractory high-grade glioma. Further studies with KRN8602 in combination with other cytotoxics and in adjuvant treatment of gliomas are warranted. J Clin Oncol 17:2579-2584. r 1999 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the new morpholino anthracycline drug MX2. A total of 27 patients with advanced cancer participated in a dose-escalation study in the first cycle of treatment with drug given i.v. at doses of 10-50 mg/m2 (total dose 16.8-107.5 mg). The mean total systemic plasma clearance (CL) of MX2 was 2.98 +/- 1.68 l/min, the mean volume of distribution at steady state was 1460 +/- 749 l and mean elimination half-life was 10.8 +/- 5.1 h. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of MX2 was linearly related to the dose per kilogram and the dose per body surface area (r2 = 0.43, P < 0.01 and r2 = 0.44, P < 0.01, respectively). CL did not correlate with total body weight, lean body mass or body surface area. The mean elimination half-lives of the metabolites M1, M2, M3 and M4 were 11.8 +/- 5.0, 21.9 +/- 11.8, 19.0 +/- 11.3 and 12.3 +/- 6.3 h, respectively. The fractional Emax model produced a much better fit to the relative nadir neutrophil count versus dose data (r2 = 0.42) than to the relative nadir neutrophil count versus AUC or peak concentration (Cmax) data (r2 = 0.15 and 0.09, respectively). There seemed to be a threshold dose of about 65 mg of MX2 at or above which a large proportion of patients had a nadir neutrophil count of less than 0.5 x 10(9)/l. This study shows that the pharmacokinetics of MX2 are similar to those of other anthracyclines. With other anthracyclines the degree of myelosuppression seems to depend more on the AUC and Cmax than on the delivered dose; however, with MX2 the degree of myelosuppression depends more on the dose given than on drug exposure expressed as the AUC or Cmax.

Previous studies have shown that recognition of melanoma by cytotoxic T lymphocytes may be restricted by HLA-A1, A2 and other HLA antigens. The present study examined the cytotoxic specificity and major histocompatibility complex restriction of cloned cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) isolated from a patient with the HLA phenotype A3,31 who had been immunized with a vaccine prepared from HLA-A1,3 melanoma cells. Cytotoxic assays against HLA-typed allogeneic melanoma cells indicated that cloned CTL from the patient were able to kill allogeneic melanoma cells expressing HLA-A1 but not other HLA-A1-positive cells. Studies on a representative clone indicated that proliferation and cytokine (tumour necrosis factor alpha) production in response to melanoma cells was also associated with HLA-A1 on melanoma cells. Response to the melanoma cells was associated with interleukin-4 (IL-4) rather than IL-2 production. The antigen recognized in the context of HLA-A1 on allogeneic melanoma cells was detected in cytotoxic assays on cells from 9 of 12 HLA-A1(+) melanoma cell lines and did not appear to be the product of the MAGE-1 or -3 genes. These findings suggest that T cells can recognize melanoma antigens in the context of alloantigens and that allogeneic vaccines containing ''immunodominant'' alloantigens may generate CTL that are ineffective against autologous melanoma. The study does not, however, exclude the possibility that CTL with specificity to the latter may be activated by allogeneic vaccines, and further studies are needed to answer this question.