BACKGROUND The optimal treatment of acute large vessel occlusion with concomitant extracranial steno‐occlusive disease of the internal carotid artery remains unclear. The PICASSO (Proximal Internal Carotid Artery Acute Stroke Secondary to Tandem or Local Occlusion Thrombectomy Trial) randomized clinical trial is designed to answer the question whether acute carotid stenting is superior to a nonacute stenting approach in the setting of a tandem lesion or tandem occlusion. METHODS PICASSO is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter, open label, assessor‐blinded acute ischemic stroke trial with pragmatic design enrolling up to 404 patients at up to 60 sites. Patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion with severe stenosis or complete occlusion (70%–100%) of the extracranial carotid artery who meet the imaging and clinical eligibility criteria will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo mechanical thrombectomy of the intracranial lesion plus emergent stenting of the extracranial lesion versus mechanical thrombectomy plus no stenting up to 16 hours from last known well. RESULTS The primary efficacy outcome is the ordinal shift of 90‐day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. The primary analysis will be based on the intention‐to‐treat principle stratified by the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT [Computed Tomography] Score (7–8 versus 9–10), degree of proximal carotid stenosis (70%–90% versus 91%–100%), NIHSS (≤ 10 versus > 10), and use of intravenous thrombolysis. The primary safety outcome is symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Secondary outcomes include 1‐year mRS (dichotomized and ordinal), successful reperfusion, and vessel patency at follow‐up. Subgroup analyses will include comparison of intravenous versus oral antiplatelets in the stenting arm, and treatment of proximal intracranial occlusion first versus a simultaneous approach. CONCLUSION PICASSO is a pragmatic randomized trial, designed to address the safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy with acute carotid stenting versus nonacute stenting with or without delayed revascularization treatment in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion and concomitant extracranial severe stenosis or complete occlusion. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05611242.

ImportanceRecent large infarct thrombectomy trials used heterogeneous imaging modalities and time windows for patient selection. Noncontrast computed tomographic (CT) scan is the most common stroke imaging approach. It remains uncertain whether thrombectomy is effective for patients with large infarcts identified using noncontrast CT alone within 24 hours of stroke onset.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of thrombectomy in patients with a large infarct on a noncontrast CT scan within 24 hours of onset.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsOpen-label, blinded–end point, bayesian-adaptive randomized trial with interim analyses for early stopping (futility or success) or population enrichment, which was conducted at 47 US academic and community-based stroke thrombectomy centers. Three hundred patients presenting within 24 hours with anterior-circulation, large-vessel occlusion and large infarct on noncontrast CT scan, with Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Scores of 2 to 5, were randomized to undergo thrombectomy or usual care. Enrollment occurred July 16, 2019 to October 17, 2022; final follow-up, January 25, 2023.InterventionThe intervention patients (n = 152) underwent endovascular treatment using standard thrombectomy devices and usual medical care. Control patients (n = 148) underwent usual medical care alone.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary efficacy end point was improvement in 90-day functional outcome measured using mean utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale (UW-mRS) scores (range, 0 [death or severe disability] to 10 [no symptoms]; minimum clinically important difference, 0.3). A bayesian model determined the posterior probability that the intervention would be superior to usual care; statistical significance was a 1-sided posterior probability of .975 or more. The primary adverse event end point was 90-day mortality; secondary adverse event end points included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and radiographic intracranial hemorrhage.ResultsThe trial enrolled 300 patients (152 intervention, 148 control; 138 females [46%]; median age, 67 years), without early stopping or enrichment; 297 patients completed the 90-day follow-up. The mean (SD) 90-day UW-mRS score was 2.93 (3.39) for the intervention group vs 2.27 (2.98) for the control group with an adjusted difference of 0.63 (95% credible interval [CrI], −0.09 to 1.34; posterior probability for superiority of thrombectomy, .96). The 90-day mortality was similar between groups: 35.3% (53 of 150) for the intervention group vs 33.3% (49 of 147) for the control group. Six of 151 patients (4.0%) in the intervention group and 2 of 149 (1.3%) in the control group experienced 24-hour symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Fourteen patients of 148 (9.5%) in the intervention group vs 4 of 146 (2.7%) in the control group experienced parenchymal hematoma type 1 hemorrhages; 14 (9.5%) in the intervention group vs 5 (3.4%) in the control group experienced parenchymal hematoma type 2 hemorrhages; and 24 (16.2%) in the intervention group vs 9 (6.2%) in the control group experienced subarachnoid hemorrhages.Conclusions and RelevanceAmong patients with a large infarct on noncontrast CT within 24 hours, thrombectomy did not demonstrate improvement in functional outcomes. But the width of the credible interval around the effect estimate includes the possibility of both no important effect and a clinically relevant benefit, so the potential role of thrombectomy with this imaging approach and time window will likely require additional study.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03805308

Background Mechanical thrombectomy has been shown to be effective in patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to large‐vessel occlusion and small to moderate infarct volume. However, there are no randomized clinical trials for large‐core infarct volume comparing mechanical thrombectomy to medical therapy in the population selected based solely on noncontrast computed tomography brain scan. The TESLA (Thrombectomy for Emergent Salvage of Large Anterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke) randomized clinical trial is designed to address this clinical question. Methods The TESLA trial aim is to demonstrate the efficacy (3‐month and 1‐year disability following stroke) and safety of intraarterial mechanical thrombectomy in patients with large‐volume infarction assessed with a noncontrast computed tomography scan. The TESLA trial design is a prospective, randomized controlled, multicenter, open‐label, assessor‐blinded anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke trial with adaptive enrichment design, enrolling up to 300 patients. Patients with anterior circulation large‐vessel occlusion who meet the imaging and clinical eligibility criteria with a large‐core infarction on the basis of noncontrast computed tomography Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (2–5) adjudicated by a site investigator will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo intraarterial thrombectomy or best medical management up to 24 hours from last known well. Results The primary efficacy outcome is utility‐weighted modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score distribution at 90 days between the groups. The results will be based on an intention‐to‐treat analysis that will examine the Bayesian posterior probability that, adjusted for Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, patients with large‐core infarct volume treated with intra‐arterial thrombectomy have higher expected utility‐weighted mRS than those treated with best medical management alone. The primary safety outcome is the 90‐day death rate. Key secondary outcomes are dichotomized mRS 0 to 2 and 0 to 3 outcomes, ordinal mRS scores, and quality of life (EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level survey) at 90 days and 1 year, utility‐weighted mRS at 1 year, hemicraniectomy rate, and rate of 24‐hour symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in both groups. Conclusion TESLA is a pragmatic trial, designed to address the unanswered question of the efficacy and safety of intra‐arterial thrombectomy in patients with large infarcts diagnosed by the site investigator only on noncontrast computed tomography scan secondary to anterior circulation large‐vessel occlusion up to 24 hours from stroke symptoms onset.

The VICTORY AF Study was designed to evaluate the risk of the procedure and/or device‐related strokes in patients with PersAF on warfarin undergoing ablation with a phased radiofrequency (RF) system.

Surgical and catheter-based cardiovascular procedures and adjunctive pharmacology have an inherent risk of neurological complications. The current diversity of neurological endpoint definitions and ascertainment methods in clinical trials has led to uncertainties in the neurological risk attributable to cardiovascular procedures and inconsistent evaluation of therapies intended to prevent or mitigate neurological injury. Benefit-risk assessment of such procedures should be on the basis of an evaluation of well-defined neurological outcomes that are ascertained with consistent methods and capture the full spectrum of neurovascular injury and its clinical effect. The Neurologic Academic Research Consortium is an international collaboration intended to establish consensus on the definition, classification, and assessment of neurological endpoints applicable to clinical trials of a broad range of cardiovascular interventions. Systematic application of the proposed definitions and assessments will improve our ability to evaluate the risks of cardiovascular procedures and the safety and effectiveness of preventive therapies.

Rationale Efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy for acute stroke due to large vessel occlusion initiated beyond 6 h of time last seen well has not been demonstrated in randomized trials. Aim To establish whether subjects considered to have substantial areas of salvageable brain based on age-adjusted clinical core mismatch who can undergo endovascular treatment within 6–24 h from time last seen well (TLSW) have better outcomes at three months compared to subjects treated with standard medical therapy alone. Age-adjusted clinical core mismatch is defined by age (≤80 or >80 years), baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (10–20 or ≥21), and core size (0–20 cm3 in subjects older than 80 and, in subjects younger than 80, 0–30 cm3 with NIHSS 10–20 and 31–50 cm3 with NIHSS ≥21). Design Prospective, randomized, multicenter, Bayesian adaptive-enrichment, open label trial with blinded endpoint assessment. For the purpose of enrolment, ischemic core size will be evaluated by CT perfusion or magnetic resonance imaging-diffusion-weighted imaging measured by automated software (RAPID). Procedures Subjects with acute ischemic stroke due to computed tomography angiography- or magnetic resonance angiogram-proven arterial occlusion of the intracranial internal carotid and/or proximal middle cerebral artery (M1) with age-adjusted clinical core mismatch in whom treatment can be initiated between 6 and 24 h from TSLW are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive mechanical embolectomy with the Trevo device or medical management alone. Sequential interim analyses allowing adaptation of enrolment criteria or stopping new enrolment for futility or predicted success will occur in every 50 randomized patients starting at 150 to a maximum of 500 patients. Study outcomes The primary endpoint is the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days. The primary safety outcome is stroke-related mortality at 90 days. Analysis The primary endpoint, expressed as a utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale score is analyzed using a Bayesian posterior probability with adjustment for ischemic core size. For regulatory reasons, a nested co-primary endpoint analysis was added consisting of the proportion of subjects with modified Rankin Scale 0–2 between the active and control groups also analyzed using a Bayesian model.

Background: Catheter ablation for persistent and long standing persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF) is challenging and associated with less favorable outcomes and higher risk of thromboembolic events. VICTORY AF is a prospective, multi-center, controlled study that rigorously and independently

IMPORTANCEIntracranial stenosis is one of the most common etiologies of stroke. To our knowledge, no randomized clinical trials have compared balloon-expandable stent treatment with medical therapy in symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.OBJECTIVETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of the balloon-expandable stent plus medical therapy vs medical therapy alone in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis (≥70%).DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTSVISSIT (the Vitesse Intracranial Stent Study for Ischemic Stroke Therapy) trial is an international, multicenter, 1:1 randomized, parallel group trial that enrolled patients from 27 sites (January 2009-June 2012) with last follow-up in May 2013.INTERVENTIONSPatients (N = 112) were randomized to receive balloon-expandable stent plus medical therapy (stent group; n = 59) or medical therapy alone (medical group; n = 53).MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESPRIMARY OUTCOME MEASUREa composite of stroke in the same territory within 12 months of randomization or hard transient ischemic attack (TIA) in the same territory day 2 through month 12 postrandomization. A hard TIA was defined as a transient episode of neurological dysfunction caused by focal brain or retinal ischemia lasting at least 10 minutes but resolving within 24 hours. Primary safety measure: a composite of any stroke, death, or intracranial hemorrhage within 30 days of randomization and any hard TIA between days 2 and 30 of randomization. Disability was measured with the modified Rankin Scale and general health status with the EuroQol-5D, both through month 12.RESULTSEnrollment was halted by the sponsor after negative results from another trial prompted an early analysis of outcomes, which suggested futility after 112 patients of a planned sample size of 250 were enrolled. The 30-day primary safety end point occurred in more patients in the stent group (14/58; 24.1% [95% CI, 13.9%-37.2%]) vs the medical group (5/53; 9.4% [95% CI, 3.1%-20.7%]) (P = .05). Intracranial hemorrhage within 30 days occurred in more patients in the stent group (5/58; 8.6% [95% CI, 2.9%-19.0%]) vs none in the medical group (95% CI, 0%-5.5%) (P = .06). The 1-year primary outcome of stroke or hard TIA occurred in more patients in the stent group (21/58; 36.2% [95% CI, 24.0-49.9]) vs the medical group (8/53; 15.1% [95% CI, 6.7-27.6]) (P = .02). Worsening of baseline disability score (modified Rankin Scale) occurred in more patients in the stent group (14/58; 24.1% [95% CI, 13.9%-37.2%]) vs the medical group (6/53; 11.3% [95% CI, 4.3%-23.0%]) (P = .09).The EuroQol-5D showed no difference in any of the 5 dimensions between groups at 12-month follow-up.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEAmong patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis, the use of a balloon-expandable stent compared with medical therapy resulted in an increased 12-month risk of added stroke or TIA in the same territory, and increased 30-day risk of any stroke or TIA. These findings do not support the use of a balloon-expandable stent for patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.TRIAL REGISTRATIONclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00816166.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a common procedure being performed approximately 600 000 times annually in the United States alone. PCI refers to balloon angioplasty with or without stent placement. The safety and efficacy of stents in reducing re-stenosis following angioplasty was highlighted by the BENESTENT (Belgian Netherlands Stent) and STRESS (Stent Restenosis Study) studies.1,2 Following these landmark studies, the rate of stent placement has increased exponentially, with stenting being performed in up to 84% of PCI procedures.3 Stenting necessitates the use of dual anti-platelet therapy (DAT) to prevent stent thrombosis (STH). However, the period when uninterrupted DAT is required, which is up to one year in the case of drug-eluting stents, can be problematic if surgery is required or if a bleeding complication occurs. This paper discusses the indications for PCI, the evolution of stent therapy and the management of an intracranial hemorrhage while on DAT.

Background: Patients with high-grade symptomatic intracranial stenosis (>= 70%) have an increased risk of recurrent stroke despite medical treatment with antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy. Intracranial stenting has been proposed as a viable treatment option for this high-risk patient population; however, evaluation of this therapy in randomized multicenter trials is needed. In this article, we present the design and methods of the Vitesse Intracranial Stent Study for Ischemic Therapy (VISSIT) trial for symptomatic intracranial stenosis. Methods: The VISSIT trial is a randomized control study designed to evaluate the safety, probable benefit, and effectiveness of the PHAROS Vitesse neurovascular balloon-expandable stent system plus medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in patients with cerebral or retinal ischemia due to neurovascular stenosis (>= 70%) for preventing the primary composite end point: stroke in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event within 12 months of randomization or hard transient ischemic attack in the same territory (distal to the target lesion) as the presenting event from day 2 through month 12 postrandomization. Results: Enrollment began in February 2009 and was halted in January 2012 with 112 subjects enrolled into the study. Clinical follow-up will continue for the planned period of 12 months postrandomization. Conclusions: The VISSIT trial may provide valuable insight into the use of balloon-expandable intracranial stent as a treatment option for high-risk patients. Lessons learned from this trial may better guide future clinical trial design on best patient selection, stenting techniques, and periprocedural management.

Object Intravenous sodium nitrite has been shown to prevent and reverse cerebral vasospasm in a primate model of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The present Phase IIA dose-escalation study of sodium nitrite was conducted to determine the compound's safety in humans with aneurysmal SAH and to establish its pharmacokinetics during a 14-day infusion. Methods In 18 patients (3 cohorts of 6 patients each) with SAH from a ruptured cerebral aneurysm, nitrite (3 patients) or saline (3 patients) was infused. Sodium nitrite and saline were delivered intravenously for 14 days, and a dose-escalation scheme was used for the nitrite, with a maximum dose of 64 nmol/kg/min. Sodium nitrite blood levels were frequently sampled and measured using mass spectroscopy, and blood methemoglobin levels were continuously monitored using a pulse oximeter. Results In the 14-day infusions in critically ill patients with SAH, there was no toxicity or systemic hypotension, and blood methemoglobin levels remained at 3.3% or less in all patients. Nitrite levels increased rapidly during intravenous infusion and reached steady-state levels by 12 hours after the start of infusion on Day 1. The nitrite plasma half-life was less than 1 hour across all dose levels evaluated after stopping nitrite infusions on Day 14. Conclusions Previous preclinical investigations of sodium nitrite for the prevention and reversal of vasospasm in a primate model of SAH were effective using doses similar to the highest dose examined in the current study (64 nmol/kg/min). Results of the current study suggest that safe and potentially therapeutic levels of nitrite can be achieved and sustained in critically ill patients after SAH from a ruptured cerebral aneurysm. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT00873015 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Background and Purpose— Many patients with an acute stroke live in areas without ready access to a Primary or Comprehensive Stroke Center. The formation of care facilities that meet the needs of these patients might improve their care and outcomes and guide them and emergency responders to such centers within a stroke system of care. Methods— The Brain Attack Coalition conducted an electronic search of the English medical literature from January 2000 to December 2012 to identify care elements and processes shown to be beneficial for acute stroke care. We used evidence grading and consensus paradigms to synthesize recommendations for Acute Stroke–Ready Hospitals (ASRHs). Results— Several key elements for an ASRH were identified, including acute stroke teams, written care protocols, involvement of emergency medical services and emergency department, and rapid laboratory and neuroimaging testing. Unique aspects include the use of telemedicine, hospital transfer protocols, and drip and ship therapies. Emergent therapies include the use of intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator and the reversal of coagulopathies. Although many of the care elements are similar to those of a Primary Stroke Center, compliance rates of ≥67% are suggested in recognition of the staffing, logistical, and financial challenges faced by rural facilities. Conclusions— ASRHs will form the foundation for acute stroke care in many settings. Recommended elements of an ASRH build on those proven to improve care and outcomes at Primary Stroke Centers. The ASRH will be a key component for patient care within an evolving stroke system of care.

There is a need for real-time non-invasive, continuous monitoring of cerebral blood flow (CBF) during surgery, in intensive care units and clinical research. We investigated a new non-invasive hybrid technology employing ultrasound tagged near infrared spectroscopy (UT-NIRS) that may estimate changes in CBF using a cerebral blood flow index (CFI). Changes over time for UT-NIRS CFI and 133 Xenon single photon emission computer tomography ( 133 Xe-SPECT) CBF data were assessed in 10 healthy volunteers after an intravenous bolus of acetazolamide. UT-NIRS CFI was measured continuously and SPECT CBF was measured at baseline, 15 and 60 min after acetazolamide. We found significant changes over time in CFI by UT-NIRS and CBF by SPECT after acetazolamide ( P ≤ 0.001). Post hoc tests showed a significant increase in CFI ( P = 0.011) and SPECT CBF ( P < 0.001) at 15 min after acetazolamide injection. There was a significant correlation between CFI and SPECT CBF values ( r = 0.67 and P ≤ 0.033) at 15 min, but not at 60 min ( P ≥ 0.777). UT-NIRS detected an increase in CFI following an acetazolamide bolus, which correlated with CBF measured with 133 Xe-SPECT. This study demonstrates that UT-NIRS technology may be a promising new technique for non-invasive and real-time bedside CBF monitoring.

Cerebral embolic events related to carotid and cardiac disease have been known for decades. Recently, cerebral embolic events have become a focus of clinical importance as complications of vascular procedures. Further, the development of new technologies and procedures has increased the overall clinical significance. Although the relative safety of these procedures is usually defined by acute stroke risk, it is also becoming clear that far more subclinical events are occurring. Recent reports provided substantial evidence of memory loss, cognitive decline, and dementia related to these so-called silent infarcts. Literature reports of magnetic resonance imaging events lead to an estimate of as many as 600,000 patients with new brain injury each year in the United States alone. Given the magnitude of the numbers involved, the impact of accelerated cognitive loss and premature senescence in a vulnerable at-risk population could well be significant.

Cerebral embolic events related to carotid and cardiac disease have been known for decades. Recently, cerebral embolic events have become a focus of clinical importance as complications of vascular procedures. Further, the development of new technologies and procedures has increased the overall clinical significance. Although the relative safety of these procedures is usually defined by acute stroke risk, it is also becoming clear that far more subclinical events are occurring. Recent reports provided substantial evidence of memory loss, cognitive decline, and dementia related to these so-called silent infarcts. Literature reports of magnetic resonance imaging events lead to an estimate of as many as 600,000 patients with new brain injury each year in the United States alone. Given the magnitude of the numbers involved, the impact of accelerated cognitive loss and premature senescence in a vulnerable at-risk population could well be significant.

Magnesium offers theoretic vascular and neu- roprotective benefits for patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. An electronic literature search was conducted to identify original research studies describing intravenous magnesium treatment in patients with SAH published in English between January 1990 and October 2010. Seven- teen articles were identified and reviewed, including one phase III randomized-controlled clinical trial and six phase II randomized-controlled trials. Study quality was low for most of the included studies, with the phase III trial con- sidered to be of moderate quality. Due to inconsistently reported benefits and the occurrence of side effects, phase II data suggested that intravenous magnesium for SAH provided either no overall net benefit or uncertain trade- offs. Benefit was likewise not supported in the single phase III clinical trial.