The enormous implications caused by type 2 diabetes on patients, families and health systems in the U.S. require health care providers to apply measures that reduce its burden. Scientific evidence clearly shows that proper screening of populations at risk, implementation of interventions proven beneficial in preventing type 2 diabetes and the use of modern technology in educating patients to adopt a healthier lifestyle are paramount in decreasing the incidence of type 2 diabetes. In this article, we try to answer some of the questions raised by both patients and health care providers about how lifestyle modifications can play a key role in ameliorating and reversing impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes.
The University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine Internal Medicine residency implemented a program to enhance scholarship among residents. This residency is part of a small Mid-Western community-based school. Background: A Director of Research was hired and developed a structured approach consisting of: 1. Independent study regarding research methods and statistical testing and 2. Mentoring of residents and faculty in scholarly pursuits starting in the first months of residency. Methods: Scholarship for two cohorts of residents for years July 2011-2014 and January 2014-2017 were followed. Products included papers accepted/published and papers accepted/presented at national or international meetings. Results: 7 (14.8%) of 47 residents in the first cohort published 12 papers (0.25 papers/resident) with 18 faculty as co-authors (1.5/paper). 20 (43.4%) of 46 residents in the second cohort (structured program) published 39 papers (0.85 papers/resident) with 80 faculty as co-authors (2.1/paper). The difference in papers was significant by chi-square analysis. Conclusion: A structured program requiring independent study in conjunction with individualized mentoring of scholarship starting early in the first postgraduate year was successful in significantly increasing the scholarly activity of our community-based internal medicine residents and faculty. With this program, the percentage of residents publishing exceeds national statistics recently reported.
INTRODUCTION:Maternal obesity, high gestational weight gain and diabetes mellitus during pregnancy are known risk factors that correlate with high infant birth weight and the mother's race. Previous studies have focused on low birth weight, prematurity and infant mortality. This study examined the interaction between race, maternal risk factors and high infant birth weights at the population level in South Dakota to identify factors contributing to the high Native American infant birth weights. We hypothesized that high infant birth weights were associated with maternal diabetes, obesity and high gestational weight gain, and that Native American infants' higher birth weights were related to the prevalence of diabetes and obesity.MATERIALS AND METHODS:De-identified birth certificate data was provided by the South Dakota Department of Health. We used data for live infant births to South Dakota resident mothers from 2006 through 2011. The mothers were categorized as Native American or white by the mother's self-reported primary race. Infants were excluded from the study population for missing data, birth weight less than 350 g or gestational age less than 24 weeks or greater than 45 weeks. The study population included 11,416 Native American infants and 59,263 white infants for a total study population of 70,679 infants. Maternal variables (race, pre-pregnancy weight and body mass index [BMI], gestational weight gain, pre-pregnancy diabetes mellitus [DM], gestational diabetes [GDM] and delivery BMI) and infant variables (gestational age and birth weight) were analyzed using SPSS software.RESULTS:The mean birth weight (BW) of Native American (NA) infants (3377 g) was significantly greater than the mean BW of white (W) infants (3315 g) even though NA infants had a younger mean gestational age (p = 0.006). More NA infants were categorized as high birth weight (HBW) (11.8 percent) than W infants (8.5 percent). Both DM and GDM were significantly more common among NA mothers. Infants of NA mothers with GDM had a higher mean BW than infants of W mothers with GDM. There were more overweight and obese NA mothers (p = 0.006). In each maternal BMI category, NA infants had a higher mean BW. Mean BW was even higher for infants born to mothers with excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) for their BMI. The infants with the highest mean BW were born to obese NA mothers with GDM and excessive GWG (3680 g). Multivariable linear regression showed that race was the most significant variable affecting infant BW (R2 = 0.57, F = 692). Pre-pregnancy BMI, GWG and excessive GWG were also significant. The most significant interaction variables were race and GDM and race and BMI.CONCLUSIONS:Native American race, gestational diabetes mellitus, overweight and obese BMI, and excessive gestational weight gain for BMI were the most significant maternal factors associated with high infant birth weight. Mothers with any one risk factor gave birth to heavier infants. Mothers with all risk factors had infants with the highest mean birth weights in South Dakota. This large population-based study provides evidence that Native American mothers in South Dakota with GDM, overweight or obese BMI and excessive GWG are more likely to give birth to high birth weight infants. At-risk mothers should be educated regarding the risks and potential complications of high birth weight infants.
Background: The intent of this paper is to compare the impact of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) design upon nursing staff by investigating the number of footsteps walked per shift and complaints of physical distress following the relocation of a NICU from a traditional open-bay design, where many babies receive care in one large room, and a new single-family room NICU in which each baby receives care in a private room. Methods and findings: Staff nurse and expanded role neonatal nurse practitioner volunteers wore a pedometer for twelve-hour shifts in the open bay and single-family room NICUs. Data were analyzed by the severity of the nursing caseload and by shift for nurses, and by shift for neonatal nurse practitioners. For staff nurses, there was a significant increase from 5689 steps/shift (4.50 km) in the open bay NICU to 6523 (5.16 km) steps in the single-room unit. No differences were found in comparisons by shift. Nurse practitioners had a significant increase from 4025 (3.19 km) to 5157 (4.09 km) steps per shift. The number of steps at night increased from 2385 to 5982 steps; however, this difference was not significant due to the small sample size. Comparisons of nursing surveys for items specifically related to work-related musculoskeletal disorders demonstrated no significant differences. Conclusions: A statistically significant increase in footsteps per shift was found among neonatal nurses and neonatal nurse practitioners in the single-family room NICU as compared with the open bay facility. Although the results were statistically significant, the physical impact for distances walked were minimal. The number of steps in the single-family room NICU were ½ of the number reported for nurses on medical-surgical units. It should be emphasized that nursing administration anticipated the potential for the need for increased walking in the single-room NICU and additional support personnel were added to assist in supporting the nursing staff.
No randomized, blind, controlled trials have been conducted of single-family room (SFR) and open bay (OPBY) neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) designs. Many comparative studies have failed to demonstrate ill effects related to the SFR NICU. Cumulative data indicate that the single room environment is safe and effective in providing care. It is important to emphasize that care in the SFR NICU should be enhanced with appropriate developmental and family-centered care.
Of the many challenges facing professionals who practice in neonatal intensive care in the United States, the question of what type of facility is optimal has been debated for more than a decade. We have attempted to explore this question at Sanford Children’s Hospital in Sioux Falls, SD. The purpose of this article is to briefly summarize our work and other significant research findings regarding neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) room design. At this time, the single-room NICU is comparable, and possibly superior, to the open-bay NICU with the caveat that the on-going developmental needs of the neonate must be continuously assessed and appropriate interventions applied in their on-going NICU care.
Controversy regarding the optimal design for neonatal intensive care has existed for more than 20 years. Recent evidence confirms that in comparison with the traditional open-bay design, the single-room facility provides for improved control of excessive noise and light, improved staff and parental satisfaction with care and equal, or possibly reduced, cost of care. Single-room care was not associated with any increase in adverse outcomes. To optimize long term developmental outcomes, single-room care must be augmented with appropriate developmental therapy and programs to actively support parental involvement.
Objective: This paper summarizes the results of a comprehensive comparison of open-bay (OPBY) and single-family-room (SFR) neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) designs.Background: The NICU expanded from 7000 ft(2) in two large rooms to 27,000 ft(2) with 45 individual family spaces.Results: Sound measurements indicated a significant reduction in the unoccupied SFR to less than half of the levels in the OPBY NICU. However, respiratory support equipment generated levels well above those of the ambient environment. Illumination was significantly reduced in the SFR. Ambient illumination in nursing work areas was less than recommended. In other comparisons with the OPBY NICU the SFR NICU was shown to have: a shorter interval until full enteric feedings were established; improved parent satisfaction; improved staff perceptions of the environment and care; a decrease in nurses State-Trait Anxiety scores; an increased need for total numbers of staff and nursing staff per shift; increased walking per shift by nurses and nurse practitioners; and improved sleep time in a very small sample of patients. Analysis of the cost of construction showed comparable cost per ft(2); however, the cost per bed in the SFR NICU was much greater because of the increased area of this facility. Highly notable findings of this investigation included the same incidence of adverse outcomes of care and a reduction in the adjusted direct cost of care in the SFR NICU.Conclusion: These data overwhelmingly support the SFR NICU in preference to the traditional OPBY facility. They substantiate that the SFR NICU should be the new standard for NICU care.
OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this research was to test the hypothesis that parental satisfaction with neonatal intensive care is greater in a single-family room facility as compared with a conventional open-bay neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). METHODS:This investigation was a prospective cohort study comparing satisfaction survey results for parents who responded to a commercially available parent NICU satisfaction survey following the provision of NICU care in open-bay and single-family room facilities. A subset of 16 items indicative of family-centered care was also computed and compared for these two NICU facilities. RESULTS:Parents whose babies received care in the single-family room facility expressed significantly improved survey responses in regard to the NICU environment, overall assessment of care, and total survey score than did parents of neonates in the open-bay facility. With the exception of the section on nursing in which scores in both facilities were high, nonsignificant improvement in median scores for the sections on delivery, physicians, discharge planning, and personal issues were noted. The total median item score for family-centered care was significantly greater in the single-family room than the open-bay facility. CONCLUSIONS:Parental satisfaction with care in the single-family room NICU was improved in comparison with the traditional open-bay NICU. The single-family room environment appears more conducive to the provision of family-centered care. Improved parental satisfaction with care and the potential for enhanced family-centered care need to be considered in decisions made regarding the configuration of NICU facilities in the future.
The neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is an environment that provides premature and fragile infants with health provisions needed to make a complete recovery. Premature infants are often born before their auditory systems have had an opportunity to fully mature. Research has shown that the ambient acoustic environment in the NICU exceeds the maximum noise level recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics, even after measures have been taken to decrease noise levels. The purpose of this study is to evaluate noise levels inside an Ohmeda Medical Giraffe™ OmniBed™, the natural attenuation of the incubator, and the effects of modifications on attenuation and reverberation within the Giraffe TM OmniBed™. The normal operation of the Giraffe™ OmniBed™ is 41.7 dBA which indicates a lower noise of operation than previous studies. The Giraffe™ OmniBed™ naturally attenuates 12 dBA. Leaving an access latch or portal door open causes a statistically significant (P=.001) increase in sound within the bassinet. All modifications in the no-noise and the noise conditions showed a statistically significant (P=.001) drop in L(eq) when compared to baseline.
This study determined whether nutrition outcomes of neonates who were receiving neonatal intensive care were improved with the implementation of a fully functioning multidisciplinary team that included a registered dietitian. A medical record review was conducted of neonates with birth weights of 1500 g or less who were cared for in Sanford Children's Hospital neonatal intensive care unit from January 1 to December 31, 2001 (prior to functioning multidisciplinary team establishment) and January 1 to December 31, 2004 (subsequent to establishment of a multidisciplinary team). Data from charts in the 2 time periods were examined for differences in nutrition outcomes. Outcome variables included length of stay, birth weight, discharge weight, weight gained for specified time periods, weight at full feeds, weight gain per day, length, head circumference, and number of days to start enteral feeding. Analysis of covariance, controlling for the effect of birth weight, was used to determine differences and was considered significant at P < .05. The mean length of stay (65 days, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 48-68 vs 72 days, 95% CI: 53-73) was not different for the 2 periods. The mean weight at the beginning of enteral feeding was significantly less in the period prior to the establishment of the multidisciplinary team (1099 g, 95% CI: 955-1165 vs 1164 g, 95% CI: 1067-1211, respectively). Weight at discharge, total weight gained, total daily weight gained, daily weight gain from birth to the initiation of enteral feeds, daily weight gain from birth to full feeds, and head circumference growth were significantly greater for neonates in the postgroup than in the pre-multidisciplinary team group. Implementation of a multidisciplinary team that included a registered dietitian improved the nutrition outcomes of low birth weight infants in a neonatal intensive care unit.
OBJECTIVETo determine if docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and arachidonic acid (ARA) supplementation influences growth or visual acuity of formula-fed premature infants.STUDY DESIGNDouble-blind, multi-center study of 194 premature infants given preterm formula with no DHA or ARA (control), 0.15% energy DHA, or 0.14% DHA + 0.27% ARA from single-cell triglycerides for at least 28 days and then fed term formula (no DHA or ARA) to 57 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA), with 90 breast-fed term infants as reference.RESULTSInfants fed DHA+ARA formula gained weight significantly faster (post-hoc analysis) during preterm formula feeding than control infants (34.7 vs. 30.7 g/d) and had weights and weight:length ratios not different from term breast-fed infants at 48 and 57 weeks PMA. Infants fed control or DHA formula had lower body weights than term infants. Red blood cell phosphatidylethanolamine ARA was significantly correlated to weight gain during preterm formula feeding and to weight and length at 40, 48, and 57 weeks PMA (r = 0.19 to 0.24, P =.004-.02). Providing DHA or DHA+ARA during the preterm period had no effect on subsequent visual acuity or incidence of adverse events.CONCLUSIONSFeeding DHA+ARA from single-cell triglycerides enhances weight gain in formula-fed premature infants with no evidence of adverse effects.
skeletal maturation in infancy syndrome: report of a third case. J Pediatr 1973;83:829. 3. Visveshwara N, Rudolph N, Dragutsky D. Syndrome of accelerated skeletal maturation in infancy, peculiar facies, and multiple congenital anomalies. J Pediatr 1974;84:553. 4. Hassan M, Sutton T, Mage K, et al. The syndrome of accelerated bone maturation in the newborn infant with dysmorphism and congenital malformations. Pediatr Radiol 1976;5:53. 5. Perrin JCS, Arcinue E, Hoffman WH, et al. Accelerated skeletal maturation syndrome with pulmonary hypertension. Birth Defects 1976;12:209. 6. Menashe VD, Farrechi C, Miller M. Hypoventilation and cor pulmonale due to chronic upper airway obstruction. J Pediatr 1965;67:198. 7. Luke MJ, Mehrizi A, Folger GM Jr, et al. Chronic nasopharyngeal obstruction as a cause of cardiomegaly, cor pulmonale, and pulmonary edema. Pediatrics 1966;37:762. 8. Ainger LE. Large tonsils and adenoids in small children
There were 47 seriously-ill neonates with medical causes of respiratory distress and 10 infants with severe respiratory distress secondary to a congenital diaphragmatic hernia treated with tolazoline according to a strict protocol designed to manage persistent fetal circulation (PFC). Of the 47 infants, 28 (60%) had a positive response defined as an increase in the pO2 greater than or equal to 24 mm Hg within 4 hr of beginning the drug. Of 7 infants, 4 with congenital diaphragmatic hernia had a positive response. The mean increase in the pO2 for the 47 infants was statistically significant (p less than .05). Of the 47 infants with medical disorders, 27 survived (survival 57%), whereas only 2 of the 10 infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia and severe persistent fetal circulation survived (survival 28%). Erythema (60%), hematest positive gastric aspirates (55%), thrombocytopenia (45%), hyponatremia (40%) and increased gastric aspirates (36%) were the most common adverse effects occurring during tolazoline infusion. Hypotension occurred in nine cases, but was transient. Of the 27 survivors, 20 with medical causes of persistent fetal circulation were evaluated at age 1 yr. Eighty percent of these infants studied were considered normal as defined by an MDI and PI of the Bayley Scales of greater than or equal to 70. These data suggest that tolazoline is a useful adjunct in the management of neonates with PFC. In addition, tolazoline was more effective in mechanically ventilated neonates treated with respiratory paralytic agents. Although tolazoline resulted in a significant improvement in the paO2 in 4 infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia, it did not appear to improve mortality in these infants.