Objective: The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor a (PPARa) is a transcription factor driving target genes involved in fatty acid (3oxidation. To what extent various PPARa interacting proteins may assist its function as a transcription factor is incompletely understood. An ORFeome-wide unbiased mammalian protein-protein interaction trap (MAPPIT) using PPARa as bait revealed a PPARa-ligand-dependent interaction with the orphan nuclear receptor estrogen-related receptor a (ERRa). The goal of this study was to characterize the nature of the interaction in depth and to explore whether it was of physiological relevance. Methods: We used orthogonal protein-protein interaction assays and pharmacological inhibitors of ERRa in various systems to confirm a functional interaction and study the impact of crosstalk mechanisms. To characterize the interaction surfaces and contact points we applied a random mutagenesis screen and structural overlays. We pinpointed the extent of reciprocal ligand effects of both nuclear receptors via coregulator peptide recruitment assays. On PPARa targets revealed from a genome-wide transcriptome analysis, we performed an ERRa chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis on both fast and fed mouse livers. Results: Random mutagenesis scanning of PPARa's ligand-binding domain and coregulator profiling experiments supported the involvement of (a) bridging coregulator(s), while recapitulation of the interaction in vitro indicated the possibility of a trimeric interaction with RXRa. The PPARa$ERRa interaction depends on 3 C-terminal residues within helix 12 of ERRa and is strengthened by both PGC1a and serum deprivation. Pharmacological inhibition of ERRa decreased the interaction of ERRa to ligand-activated PPARa and revealed a transcriptome in line with enhanced mRNA expression of prototypical PPARa target genes, suggesting a role for ERRa as a transcriptional repressor. Strikingly, on other PPARa targets, including the isolated PDK4 enhancer, ERRa behaved oppositely. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses demonstrate a PPARa ligand-dependent ERRa recruitment onto chromatin at PPARa-binding regions, which is lost following ERRa inhibition in fed mouse livers. Conclusions: Our data support the coexistence of multiple layers of transcriptional crosstalk mechanisms between PPARa and ERRa, which may serve to finetune the activity of PPARa as a nutrient-sensing transcription factor. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier GmbH. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

ObjectiveThe peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) is a transcription factor driving target genes involved in fatty acid β-oxidation. To what extent various PPARα interacting proteins may assist its function as a transcription factor is incompletely understood. An ORFeome-wide unbiased mammalian protein-protein interaction trap (MAPPIT) using PPARα as bait revealed a PPARα-ligand-dependent interaction with the orphan nuclear receptor estrogen-related receptor α (ERRα). The goal of this study was to characterize the nature of the interaction in depth and to explore whether it was of physiological relevance.MethodsWe used orthogonal protein-protein interaction assays and pharmacological inhibitors of ERRα in various systems to confirm a functional interaction and study the impact of crosstalk mechanisms. To characterize the interaction surfaces and contact points we applied a random mutagenesis screen and structural overlays. We pinpointed the extent of reciprocal ligand effects of both nuclear receptors via coregulator peptide recruitment assays. On PPARα targets revealed from a genome-wide transcriptome analysis, we performed an ERRα chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis on both fast and fed mouse livers.ResultsRandom mutagenesis scanning of PPARα’s ligand-binding domain and coregulator profiling experiments supported the involvement of (a) bridging coregulator(s), while recapitulation of the interaction in vitro indicated the possibility of a trimeric interaction with RXRα. The PPARα·ERRα interaction depends on 3 C-terminal residues within helix 12 of ERRα and is strengthened by both PGC1α and serum deprivation. Pharmacological inhibition of ERRα decreased the interaction of ERRα to ligand-activated PPARα and revealed a transcriptome in line with enhanced mRNA expression of prototypical PPARα target genes, suggesting a role for ERRα as a transcriptional repressor. Strikingly, on other PPARα targets, including the isolated PDK4 enhancer, ERRα behaved oppositely. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses demonstrate a PPARα ligand-dependent ERRα recruitment onto chromatin at PPARα-binding regions, which is lost following ERRα inhibition in fed mouse livers.ConclusionOur data support the coexistence of multiple layers of transcriptional crosstalk mechanisms between PPARα and ERRα, which may serve to finetune the activity of PPARα as a nutrient-sensing transcription factor.

Nuclear receptor crosstalk can be defined as the interplay between different nuclear receptors or between their overlapping signalling pathways. A subset of nuclear receptors (such as PPARs and RARs) engage in the formation of well-characterized 'typical' heterodimers with RXR. 'Atypical' heterodimers (such as GR with PPARs, or PPAR with ERR) might form a novel class of physical complexes that might be more transient in nature. These heterodimers might harbour strong transcriptional flexibility, with no strict need for DNA binding of both partners. Direct crosstalk could stem from a pairwise physical association between atypical nuclear receptor heterodimers, either via pre-existing interaction pairs or via interactions that are newly induced with small molecules; such crosstalk might constitute an uncharted space to target nuclear receptor physiological and/or pathophysiological actions. In this Review, we discuss the emerging aspects of crosstalk in the nuclear receptor field and present various mechanistic crosstalk modes with examples that support applicability of the atypical heterodimer concept. Stabilization or disruption, in a context-dependent or cell type-dependent manner, of these more transient heterodimers is expected to fuel unprecedented translational approaches to yield novel therapeutic agents to treat major human diseases with higher precision.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) is a nuclear receptor of clinical interest as a drug target in various metabolic disorders. PPARα also exhibits marked anti-inflammatory capacities. The first-generation PPARα agonists, the fibrates, have however been hampered by drug-drug interaction issues, statin drop-in, and ill-designed cardiovascular intervention trials. Notwithstanding, understanding the molecular mechanisms by which PPARα works will enable control of its activities as a drug target for metabolic diseases with an underlying inflammatory component. Given its role in reshaping the immune system, the full potential of this nuclear receptor subtype as a versatile drug target with high plasticity becomes increasingly clear, and a novel generation of agonists may pave the way for novel fields of applications.

The transcriptional activity of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is co-determined by its ability to recruit a vast and varying number of cofactors. We here identify Striatin-3 (STRN3) as a novel interaction partner of GR that interferes with GR's ligand-dependent transactivation capacity. Remarkably, STRN3 selectively affects only GR-dependent transactivation and leaves GR-dependent transrepression mechanisms unhampered. We found that STRN3 down-regulates GR transactivation by an additional recruitment of the catalytic subunit of protein phosphatase 2A (PPP2CA) to GR. We hypothesize the existence of a functional trimeric complex in the nucleus, able to dephosphorylate GR at serine 211, a known marker for GR transactivation in a target gene-dependent manner. The presence of STRN3 appears an absolute prerequisite for PPP2CA to engage in a complex with GR. Herein, the C-terminal domain of GR is essential, reflecting ligand-dependency, yet other receptor parts are also needed to create additional contacts with STRN3.

Glucocorticoids (GCs; referred to clinically as corticosteroids) are steroid hormones with potent anti-inflammatory and immune modulatory profiles. Depending on the context, these hormones can also mediate pro-inflammatory activities, thereby serving as primers of the immune system. Their target receptor, the GC receptor (GR), is a multi-tasking transcription factor, changing its role and function depending on cellular and organismal needs. To get a clearer idea of how to improve the safety profile of GCs, recent studies have investigated the complex mechanisms underlying GR functions. One of the key findings includes both pro- and anti-inflammatory roles of GR, and a future challenge will be to understand how such paradoxical findings can be reconciled and how GR ultimately shifts the balance to a net anti-inflammatory profile. As such, there is consensus that GR deserves a second life as a drug target, with either refined classic GCs or a novel generation of nonsteroidal GR-targeting molecules, to meet the increasing clinical needs of today to treat inflammation and cancer.

Children with atopic dermatitis show an increased risk to develop asthma later in life, a phenomenon referred to as "atopic march," which emphasizes the need for secondary prevention therapies. This study aimed to investigate whether relief of skin inflammation by glucocorticoids and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists might influence the subsequent development of asthma in a murine model for the atopic march in which mice were repeatedly exposed to house dust mite via the skin, followed by exposure to house dust mite in lungs. To abrogate atopic dermatitis, mice received topical treatment with glucocorticoid receptor/peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonists. Nuclear receptor ligand effects were assessed on primary keratinocytes and dendritic cells, as central players in skin inflammation. Prior house dust mite-induced skin inflammation aggravates allergic airway inflammation and induces a mixed T helper type 2/T helper type 17 response in the lungs. Cutaneous combined activation of glucocorticoid receptor/peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma reduced skin inflammation to a higher extent compared to single activation. Additive anti-inflammatory effects were more prominent in dendritic cells, as compared to keratinocytes. Alleviation of allergic skin inflammation by activation of glucocorticoid receptor/peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma appeared insufficient to avoid the allergic immune response in the lungs, but efficiently reduced asthma severity by counteracting the Th17 response. Glucocorticoid receptor/peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma co-activation represents a potent remedy against allergic skin inflammation and worsening of atopic march.

Glucocorticoids, although being one of the eldest drugs in the clinic and despite their widespread usage for the treatment of inflammatory and immune disorders and cancer, have not yet come of age when it comes to a full understanding of how they work. The majority of the biological actions of glucocorticoid hormones are explained by a wide diversity in the cellular action mechanism of the hormone-activated Glucocorticoid Receptor (GR). All molecular mechanisms described in the current overview are not only complex, exhibiting an astonishing degree of gene- and tissue-specificity, but on top of this they are also non-exclusive. This layering of mechanisms makes it extremely difficult for researchers to extract the crucial pieces of information that would assist in a rational design of drugs with an improved therapeutic profile, i.e. a satisfying and maintained therapeutic response in the absence of the many incapacitating glucocorticoid-associated side effects, such as diabetes, osteoporosis, muscle wasting, depression etc. In direct correlation with increased glucocorticoid usage as observed in the clinic, the impetus and desire to reveal all of these mechanisms -and most importantly, to try to integrate them in a sensible manner for the sake of finding better alternatives- has never been stronger.

The Microarray Assay for Realtime Coregulator-Nuclear receptor Interaction (MARCoNI) technology allows the identification of nuclear receptor-coregulator interactions via flow-through microarrays. As such, differences in the coregulator profile between distinct nuclear receptors or of a single receptor in agonist or antagonist mode can be investigated, even in a single run. In this chapter, the method how to perform these peptide microarrays with cell lysates containing the overexpressed glucocorticoid receptor is described, as well as the influence of assay parameters, variations to the protocol, and data analysis.

Compound A possesses glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-dependent anti-inflammatory properties. Just like classical GR ligands, Compound A can repress NF-κB-mediated gene expression. However, the monomeric Compound A-activated GR is unable to trigger glucocorticoid response element-regulated gene expression. The heat shock response potently activates heat shock factor 1 (HSF1), upregulates Hsp70, a known GR chaperone, and also modulates various aspects of inflammation. We found that the selective GR modulator Compound A and heat shock trigger similar cellular effects in A549 lung epithelial cells. With regard to their anti-inflammatory mechanism, heat shock and Compound A are both able to reduce TNF-stimulated IκBα degradation and NF-κB p65 nuclear translocation. We established an interaction between Compound A-activated GR and Hsp70, but remarkably, although the presence of the Hsp70 chaperone as such appears pivotal for the Compound A-mediated inflammatory gene repression, subsequent novel Hsp70 protein synthesis is uncoupled from an observed CpdA-induced Hsp70 mRNA upregulation and hence obsolete in mediating CpdA's anti-inflammatory effect. The lack of a Compound A-induced increase in Hsp70 protein levels in A549 cells is not mediated by a rapid proteasomal degradation of Hsp70 or by a Compound A-induced general block on translation. Similar to heat shock, Compound A can upregulate transcription of Hsp70 genes in various cell lines and BALB/c mice. Interestingly, whereas Compound A-dependent Hsp70 promoter activation is GR-dependent but HSF1-independent, heat shock-induced Hsp70 expression alternatively occurs in a GR-independent and HSF1-dependent manner in A549 lung epithelial cells.