assir F. Marrouche, MD, Atul Verma, MD, Oussama Wazni, MD, Robert Schweikert, MD, avid O. Martin, MD, Walid Saliba, MD, Fethi Kilicaslan, MD, Jennifer Cummings, MD, . David Burkhardt, MD, Mandeep Bhargava, MD, Dianna Bash, RN, Johannes Brachmann, MD, ens Guenther, MD, Steven Hao, MD, Salwa Beheiry, RN, Antonio Rossillo, MD, Antonio Raviele, MD, akis Themistoclakis, MD, Andrea Natale, MD leveland, Ohio

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter often coexist. The long‐term occurrence of atrial fibrillation in patients presenting with atrial flutter alone is unknown. We report the long‐term follow‐up in patients who underwent cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for treatment of lone atrial flutter. Methods and Results: Between January 1997 and June 2002, 632 patients underwent cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for the treatment of typical atrial flutter at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. Three hundred sixty‐three patients were included in this study and followed for a mean duration of 39 ± 11 months. The mean duration of atrial flutter symptoms was 12 ± 5 months. Mean left‐atrial size and left‐ventricular ejection fraction were 4.2 ± 0.8 cm and 47 ± 13%, respectively. After a mean follow‐up time of 39 ± 11 months, 13% (48 of 363) of the patients remained in sinus rhythm. Five percent (18 of 363) of patients experienced recurrence of atrial flutter only. Sixty‐eight percent (246 of 363) experienced the onset of atrial fibrillation and 14% (51 of 363) experienced recurrence of atrial flutter and the new onset of atrial fibrillation. Overall, 82% (297 of 363) of the patients experienced new onset of drug refractory atrial fibrillation. Left‐atrial size was a predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence post‐atrial flutter ablation. Conclusion: At long‐term follow‐up, approximately 82% of patients post‐cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for atrial flutter developed drug refractory atrial fibrillation. This finding suggests that elimination of atrial flutter might delay, but does not prevent, atrial fibrillation. Evidence suggests both arrhythmias may share common triggers and such patients may derive a better long‐term benefit from anatomical ablative treatment of atrial fibrillation as well.

CONTEXT:Treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs and anticoagulation is considered first-line therapy in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency ablation may cure AF, obviating the need for antiarrhythmic drugs and anticoagulation.OBJECTIVE:To determine whether PVI is feasible as first-line therapy for treating patients with symptomatic AF.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:A multicenter prospective randomized study conducted from December 31, 2001, to July 1, 2002, of 70 patients aged 18 to 75 years who experienced monthly symptomatic AF episodes for at least 3 months and had not been treated with antiarrhythmic drugs.INTERVENTION:Patients were randomized to receive either PVI using radiofrequency ablation (n=33) or antiarrhythmic drug treatment (n=37), with a 1-year follow-up.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Recurrence of AF, hospitalization, and quality of life assessment.RESULTS:Two patients in the antiarrhythmic drug treatment group and 1 patient in the PVI group were lost to follow-up. At the end of 1-year follow-up, 22 (63%) of 35 patients who received antiarrhythmic drugs had at least 1 recurrence of symptomatic AF compared with 4 (13%) of 32 patients who received PVI (P<.001). Hospitalization during 1-year follow-up occurred in 19 (54%) of 35 patients in the antiarrhythmic drug group compared with 3 (9%) of 32 in the PVI group (P<.001). In the antiarrhythmic drug group, the mean (SD) number of AF episodes decreased from 12 (7) to 6 (4), after initiating therapy (P = .01). At 6-month follow-up, the improvement in quality of life of patients in the PVI group was significantly better than the improvement in the antiarrhythmic drug group in 5 subclasses of the Short-Form 36 health survey. There were no thromboembolic events in either group. Asymptomatic mild or moderate pulmonary vein stenosis was documented in 2 (6%) of 32 patients in the PVI group.CONCLUSION:Pulmonary vein isolation appears to be a feasible first-line approach for treating patients with symptomatic AF. Larger studies are needed to confirm its safety and efficacy.

Thromboembolic events are important complications of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedures, occurring in up to 2.8% of patients. In this study, we report the incidence of char formation and embolic events with different anticoagulation protocols prospectively changed to reduce such complication.

Background— The epicardial location of an arrhythmia could be responsible for unsuccessful endocardial catheter ablation. Methods and Results— In 48 patients referred after prior unsuccessful endocardial ablation, we considered percutaneous, subxiphoid instrumentation of the pericardial space for mapping and ablation. Thirty patients had ventricular tachycardia (VT), 6 patients had a right- and 4 had a left-sided accessory pathway (AP), 4 patients had inappropriate sinus tachycardia, and 4 patients had atrial arrhythmias. Of the 30 VTs, 24 (6 with ischemic cardiomyopathy, 3 with idiopathic cardiomyopathy, and 15 with normal hearts) appeared to originate from the epicardium. Seventeen (71%) of these 24 VTs were successfully ablated with epicardial lesions. The other 7 VTs had early epicardial sites that were inaccessible, predominantly because of interference from the left atrial appendage. Six of these were successfully ablated from the left coronary cusp. In 5 of the 10 patients with an AP, the earliest activation was recorded epicardially. Three of these were right atrial appendage–to–right ventricle APs, and epicardial ablation was successful. No significant complications were observed. Conclusions— Failure of endocardial ablation could reflect the presence of an epicardial arrhythmia substrate. Epicardial instrumentation and ablation appeared feasible and safe and provided an alternative strategy for the treatment of patients with a variety of arrhythmias. This was particularly true for VT, including patients without structural heart disease.

OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of pulmonary vein antrum isolation in patients with moderate valvular heart disease or open-heart surgery and atrial fibrillation (AF).BACKGROUND Valvular heart disease and open-heart surgery are commonly associated with AF and increase the risk of adverse events in AF patients.METHODS A total of 391 consecutive patients who had pulmonary vein antrum isolation performed between December 2000 and December 2002 were screened. A total of 142 of these patients had clinically significant valvular disease or prior cardiac surgery. End points included AF recurrence and pulmonary vein antrum isolation complication rates.RESULTS Patients with valvular heart disease or prior open-heart surgery were older, had larger left atria and a more advanced New York Heart Association class. They did not differ significantly with respect to gender, but had a longer history of AF. Procedure times were similar between patients with and without valvular heart disease or prior open-heart surgery. After 18 +/- 7 months in the tone AF patients, 11 +/- 5 months in patients with valvular heart disease, and 10 +/- 5 months in patients with prior open heart surgery, there was a trend toward lower recurrence of AF in patients with lone AF who enjoyed a 98% overall cure rate after up to 2 pulmonary vein antrum isolations versus 93% among patients with valvular heart disease (P = .04) and prior open heart surgery (P = .07). Complication rates were comparable between groups.CONCLUSIONS Pulmonary vein antrum isolation is safe and effective in patients with moderate valvular heart disease and the patients who developed AF after open-heart surgery. These results have implications for our understanding of the pathophysiology of AF in patients with moderate valvular heart disease or past cardiac surgery and should be considered when discussing treatment options in these patients. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

OBJECTIVES We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function.BACKGROUND To date, PVI has been performed primarily in patients with normal LV function. Yet, many AF patients have impaired LV systolic function. The outcomes of PVI in patients with impaired LV systolic function are unknown.METHODS We included 3 77 consecutive patients undergoing PVI between December 2000 and January 2003. Ninety-four patients had impaired LV function (ejection fraction [EF] <40%), and they comprised the study group. The control group was the remaining 283 patients who had a normal EF. End points included AF recurrence and changes in EF and quality of life (QoL).RESULTS Mean EF was 36% in our study group, compared with 54% in controls. After initial PVI, 73% of patients with impaired EF and 87% of patients with normal EF were free of AF recurrence at 14 +/- 6 months (p = 0.03). In the study group, there was a nonsignificant increase in EF of 4.6% and significant improvement in QoL. Complication rates were low and included a 1% risk of pulmonary vein stenosis.CONCLUSIONS Although the AF recurrence rate after initial PVI in impaired EF patients was higher than in normal EF subjects, nearly three-fourths of patients with impaired EF remained AF-free. Although our sample size was nonrandomized, our results suggest PVI may be a feasible therapeutic option in AF patients with impaired EF. Randomized studies with more patients and longer follow-up are warranted. (C) 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Catheter ablation has revolutionized the clinical management of atrial fibrillation (AF) by offering a curative treatment option for this highly prevalent arrhythmia. Ablation therapy is aimed at electrical isolation of the Pulmonary veins (PVs) as a means to prevent rapidly firing focal activation within the PVs from penetrating into the left atrium (LA) and initiate reentrant wavelet propagation. However, non-PV AF trigger sites may be present and lead to unsuccessful ablation or post-ablation AF recurrences. Infrequent trigger firing and the difficulty or inability to induce focal trigger activity in the electrophysiology laboratory limits invasive catheter-based mapping of non-PV trigger sites. Identification of AF trigger sites using the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) P wave morphology is feasible but conventional 12-lead scalar recordings do not offer the resolving power to provide discrete regional localization to potentially target catheter ablation. The present paper includes a review of preliminary clinical data on the use of a 65-lead ECG mapping system (Resolution Medical, Inc) for the non-invasive localization of AF trigger sites. This method utilizes a unique previously developed reference database of 34 mean paced P wave integral map patterns which are each specific to activation arising from a discrete segment in the LA and right atrium (RA). Trigger site localization is obtained by matching the P wave integral map morphology of a premature atrial contraction (PAC) with the reference database of 34 mean paced P wave integral map patterns.

Introduction: A retrospective analysis was performed to define the impact of age on the outcomes and complications in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). PVI is an evolving technique for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). The impact of age on the risks, outcomes, and complications of PVI has not been well defined.

Pulmonary vein isolation is becoming the treatment of choice for symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) that is refractory to drugs [1–3]. However, thromboembolic complications are an important limitation of this approach [4], occurring in up to 2.8% of the patients. Alternative energy sources such as cryoablation and ultrasound have the potential to improve the safety of the procedure by preventing disruption of the endothelial surface during energy delivery [5,6].

OBJECTIVES We report on the initiation of ventricular fibrillation (V-F) storm in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and the results of targeted ablation to treat VF storm.BACKGROUND Monomorphic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) have been shown to initiate VF in patients without structural heart disease.METHODS A total of 29 patients with ICM and documented VF initiation were identified. In 21 patients, VF storm was controlled with antiarrhythmic drugs and/or treatment of heart failure. Eight patients with VF (mean 52 +/- 25 episodes) refractory to medical management required ablation. All patients underwent three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping using CARTO (Biosense-Webster Inc., Diamond Bar, California), and PVCs were mapped when present. Scarred areas were identified using voltage mapping.RESULTS Monomorphic PVCs initiated VF in all 29 identified patients. Five of eight patients requiring ablation had frequent PVCs that allowed PVC mapping. The earliest activation site was consistently located in the scar border zone. The PVCs were always preceded by a Purkinje-like potential (PLP). Ablation was successfully performed at these sites. In three patients, infrequent PVCs prevented mapping, but PLPs were recorded around the scar border. Ablation targeting these potentials along the scar border was successfully performed. During follow-up (10 +/- 6 months), one patient had a single VF episode and another developed sustained, monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. There was no recurrence of VF storm.CONCLUSIONS Ventricular fibrillation in ICM is triggered by monomorphic PVCs originating from the scar border zone with preceding PLPs; targeting these PVCs may prevent VF recurrence. In the absence of PVCs, both substrate mapping and ablation appear to be equally effective. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:1715-20) (C) 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

This chapter contains section titled: Introduction Pulmonary vein isolation approach Postprocedural management Patients treated Experience with pulmonary vein isolation in patients with structural heart disease Experience with pulmonary vein isolation in patients with left ventricular dysfunction Experience with pulmonary vein isolation in patients with valve disease Pulmonary vein isolation in patients with previous cardiac surgery Comments Conclusions

Impact of Age on Pulmonary Vein Isolation. Introduction: A retrospective analysis was performed to define the impact of age on the outcomes and complications in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). PVI is an evolving technique for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). The impact of age on the risks, outcomes, and complications of PVI has not been well defined.Methods and Results: A total of 323 patients (259 men and 64 women; age 18-79 years) underwent PVI for treatment of drug-refractory symptomatic AF. An ostial isolation of the pulmonary veins was done using a cooled-tip ablation catheter guided by circular mapping. The patients were divided into three groups based on age (group I: <50 years, group II: 51-60 years, group III: >60 years) and the results were compared. There were 106 patients in group I, 114 patients in group II, and 103 patients in group III (mean age 41.3 +/- 7.8 years, 55.4 +/- 2.75 years, and 66.6 +/- 4.18 years, respectively) who underwent PVI for paroxysmal (53.8%), persistent (10.8%), or permanent (35.3%) AF Baseline characteristics were similar except for a higher prevalence of hypertension and/or structural heart disease in groups II and III (58% and 63% vs 33% in group I, respectively). The procedural variables were similar in all age groups. The overall risk of complications was similar in the three groups, except that the risk of stroke was significantly higher in patients >60 years of age (3% vs 0%; P < 0.05). The recurrence rates of AF were similar in the three age groups (15.1%, 16.7%, and 18.4%, respectively; P > 0.05). The risk of severe pulmonary vein stenosis (1.8%, 2.6%, and 0.9%, respectively) was low and did not vary with age.Conclusion: PVI is a safe and effective treatment for patients with drug-refractory symptomatic AF, and its benefits extend to all age groups. The risk of procedural complications, especially thromboembolic events, appears to be higher in the elderly age group. This observation needs to be considered while assessing potential candidates for the procedure.

Background— Pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis is a complication of ablation for atrial fibrillation. The impact of different ablation strategies on the incidence of PV stenosis and its functional characterization has not been described. Methods and Results— PV isolation was performed in 608 patients. An electroanatomic approach was used in 71 and circular mapping in 537 (distal isolation, 25; ostial isolation based on PV angiography, 102; guided by intracardiac echocardiography, 140; with energy delivery based on visualization of microbubbles, 270). Severe (≥70%) narrowing was detected in 21 patients (3.4%), and moderate (50% to 69%) and mild (<50%) narrowing occurred in 27 (4.4%) and 47 (7.7%), respectively. Severe stenosis occurred in 15.5%, 20%, 2.9%, 1.4%, and 0%, respectively. Development of symptoms was correlated with involvement of >1 PV with severe narrowing ( P =0.01), whereas all patients with mild and moderate narrowing were asymptomatic. In the latter group, lung perfusion (V/Q) scans were normal in all but 4 patients. All patients with severe stenosis had abnormal perfusion scans. Conclusions— V/Q scans are useful to assess the functional significance of PV stenosis. Mild and moderate degrees of PV narrowing are not associated with development of symptoms and seem to have no or minimal detrimental effect on pulmonary flow. The incidence of severe PV stenosis seems to be declining with better imaging techniques to ensure ostial isolation and to guide power titration. Mild narrowing 3 months after ablation does not preclude future development of severe stenosis and should be assessed with repeat imaging studies.

Objectives: We report the acute success and long-term follow-up in consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation of typical right a trial flutter (AFL) using different ablation technologies. Methods: One hundred and two patients presenting for treatment of AFL to our laboratory were included in the study. Based on availability and physician preference, ablation was performed with either a cooled-tip catheter (39 patients, group I), an 8- or 1 0-mm tip catheter connected to a high -power radipfrequency (RF) generator (25 patients, group II), or a 4- or 5-mm tip catheter (38 patients, group III). Acute ablation success was achieved in all group II and group III patients. Among the 38 patients undergoing ablation with the conventional catheter tip (group I), crossover to an 8-mm tip or a cooled tip ablation catheter was required in 11 patients (29%). The mean fluoroscopy time was significantly higher in group I (54.3 +/- 26.4 minutes) when compared to group II (39.6 +/- 19.6 minutes; P < 0.05) and group III (40 +/- 16 minutes; P = 0.0.5). After a mean follow up of 20 +/- 5 months no patient in group II experienced recurrence of AFL, whereas 18.4 % (7 of 38 patients; P < 0.05) in group I and 10% (4 of 39 patients; P < 0,05) in group III had recurrence of AFL. Ablation technologies designed to obtain larger size lesions appeared to be more effective in achieving acute ablation success of AFL and in limiting the long-term recurrence rate of this arrhythmia.

Background— Atrial flutter (AFL) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexist in the same patient. Recently it has been demonstrated that the triggers for both AF and AFL may originate in the pulmonary veins (PVs). We hypothesized that in patients with both AF and typical AFL, pulmonary vein–left atrial junction (PV-LAJ) disconnection may eliminate both arrhythmias. Methods and Results— Consecutive patients with documented symptomatic AF and typical AFL were randomly assigned to have PV-LAJ disconnection combined with cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation (group 1, n=49) or PV-LAJ disconnection alone (group 2, n=59). Within the first 8 weeks after ablation, 32 of the group 2 patients had typical AFL documented, whereas none was seen in group 1. Twenty of these 32 converted to sinus rhythm after initiating antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). Twelve were cardioverted, and AADs were started. After 8 weeks, all AADS were stopped, and only 3 patients continued to have recurrent sustained typical AFL that was eliminated by CTI ablation. Beyond 8 weeks of follow-up, 7 patients in group 1 and 6 patients in group 2 (14% and 11%, respectively) continued to have AF. Ten of these 13 patients underwent a repeat PV-LAJ disconnection procedure and were cured. The remaining 3 remained in normal sinus rhythm while taking AADs. Conclusions— In patients with both AFL and AF, PV-LAJ disconnection alone may be sufficient to control both arrhythmias. CTI block reduced early postablation recurrence of arrhythmias, which in the majority of patients reflects a short-term clinical problem.