Background The first‐line therapy for atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) is catheter‐based slow pathway modulation. If AVNRT is not inducible during an electrophysiological study, an empirical slow pathway modulation (ESPM) may be considered in patients with dual atrioventricular nodal physiology and/or a typical electrocardiogram (ECG). Methods We screened 149 symptomatic patients who underwent ESPM in our department between 1993 and 2013. All patients fulfilled the following criteria: (1) either dual atrioventricular nodal (AVN) physiology with up to 2 AVN echo beats or characteristic ECG documentation or both, (2) noninducibility of AVNRT by programmed stimulation, and (3) completion of a telephone questionnaire for long‐term follow‐up. Out of this population we retrospectively investigated 13 patients who were primarily noninducible but in whom an AVNRT occurred during or after radiofrequency (RF) delivery. Results When AVNRT occurred, the procedure lost its empirical character, and RF delivery was continued until the procedural endpoint of noninducibility of AVNRT. This endpoint was reached in all but one patient (92%). After a follow‐up of 73 ± 15 months, this patient was the only one who reported no benefit from the procedure. Conclusions Out of 149 initially noninducible patients, a considerable number (9%) exhibited AVNRT during or after RF delivery. These patients crossed over from empirical to controlled slow pathway modulation resulting in a good clinical outcome. Our observations should encourage electrophysiologists to repeat programmed stimulation even after initial empirical RF delivery to retest for inducibility.

AIMS:The second-generation multi-electrode-phased radiofrequency pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC GOLD(®)) was redesigned with the intent to improve its safety and efficacy.METHODS AND RESULTS:Using a prospectively designed single-centre database, we retrospectively analysed 128 consecutive patients (102 paroxysmal and 43 female) who underwent their first pulmonary vein isolation with the PVAC GOLD(®). The analysis focused on procedural data as well as in-hospital complications. Baseline characteristics of the patient collective were as follows: mean age 57.9 years, mean CHA2DS2-VASC was 1.73 ± 1.30; structural heart disease was present in seven patients. The PVAC GOLD(®) exhibited procedure durations of 123.1 min ± 27.9, duration of energy delivery was 18.3 min ± 11.4, and fluoroscopy duration was 16.0 min ± 7.7. The redesigned catheter shows major complication [major bleeding, transitory ischaemic attack (TIA), and pericardial tamponade] rates of 2.3% (n = 3). The overall rate of adverse events was 5.4% (n = 7). Bleeding complications were observed in three patients (2.3%), in particular there were two cases (1.6%) of minor bleeding and one case (0.8%) of major bleeding. Two patients suffered pericardial effusion, but there was no need for pericardiocentesis. Besides one TIA, there was no other thrombo-embolic event. Furthermore, one case of post-procedural fever was observed. No deaths, stroke, or haemorrhagic shock occurred. Of the 510 pulmonary veins, 508 could be reached with the PVAC GOLD(®) device using a non-steerable long sheath.CONCLUSION:The PVAC GOLD(®) seems to have an acceptable safety profile. The handling is comparable with the previous generation PVAC(®).