Symbolic InteractionEarly View Book Review Emotions as Practical Resources in Everyday Life E. Doyle McCarthy, E. Doyle McCarthy Fordham University, New York City, NY, USASearch for more papers by this author E. Doyle McCarthy, E. Doyle McCarthy Fordham University, New York City, NY, USASearch for more papers by this author First published: 09 March 2023 https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.638Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue RelatedInformation
Emotions are best studied within the domain of cultural forms and social meanings. This approach – drawn from both classical interactionism and from contemporary culture theory – brings culture and cognition into the domain of emotions. In the social sciences, the idea of emotional culture(s) draws from this cultural and collective premise and employs this concept to study the ways culture matters where emotions are concerned. Emotional culture includes some of the following concepts and ideas: vocabularies of emotion, or the rules governing expression and feeling; the idioms (both theoretical and pre-theoretical, figurative and literal) within which emotions are experienced and expressed and the degrees of refinement each of these take; the cultural patterns (beliefs, values, norms, practices) and interactional processes (face-to-face meetings, larger group interactions, mediatized interactions) within which emotions emerge and are sustained. In these different senses, emotions are described as cognitive and evaluative phenomena, for they are articulated to self and to others discursively and gesturally. Emotions are also signifiers, for they communicate and signal things about self and society in the larger sense of a shared culture or in the immediate, situational sense of two or more interactants. Studies of today's emotional culture integrate these three common themes: (1) today's cultural emphasis on the value of subjectivity and experience and their vitality; (2) the conjunction today of identity and emotion(s), for emotions are integral to what a self is today; our feelings and emotions, we typically believe, contain our deepest truths and realities; (3) the increasing intensity of social life today combined with the increased speed of life and the cultural value of closeness.
Classical and contemporary developments in the study of culture are examined for ways to conceptualize emotion(s) and to frame their study. The foundation of this approach is found in early social pragmatism and interactionism, both of which view the structuring of mind, self, and emotion as sociocultural processes. The same principles are found in contemporary arguments about emotions and subjectivity made by ‟constructionist” works in psychology and social science as well as in culture theory today. These approaches have given greater emphasis to the study of everyday beliefs of social actors, arguing that the entire domain of subjectivity is not (as commonly understood) devoid of social and cultural influence. Rather, subjectivity itself is “socially constructed.” In this way and in others, pragmatist social psychology and contemporary culture theory have both enlarged and changed the idea of subjectivity from something isolated and unique and purely individual to something shared and observable. Subjectivity’s continual formation and development take place in society in interaction with others. Accordingly, emotions and the ways they are experienced exist within socially and historically variable cultures, implying that people’s ideas about what emotions are and what they mean vary across cultures as well as within cultures.
Emotional Lives explores the changes in emotional cultures that have taken place during the last half century and continue to affect people's identities today. These changes are driven by the culture of consumerism in contemporary post-industrial society and by the emergence of new ideas about public and private life in a time when media culture generates new forms of social relationships and deep personal attachments to celebrity figures. McCarthy shows that people are drawn to public life, not only for entertainment and pleasure but also for its dramas, for memorializing events like disasters, acts of violence, and victimhood. McCarthy's cultural-sociological approach provides new insights about emotions as 'social things' and reveals how today's mass media is an important force for cultural change, including changes in people's relationships, identities, and emotions.
The problem of "culture" in the process of intercultural understanding is one of the most discussed issues among scholars today. Anthropologists, linguists, literary critics, and philosophers, just to name a few, study this issue using a problem-based and research format. Culture and cultural understanding are hereby presented by demonstrating studies and observations of two cultural anthropologists, R. H. Robbins and Clifford Geertz, a literary critic, Lionel Trilling, and C. S. Lewis, a famous writer of both fiction and non-fiction. Our intention here is to answer the question: how to describe and analyze a culture that is so different from the perspective of our own? In this sense, language and discourse are also analyzed in this paper as part of culture and can indicate some of our own moral perspectives and judgments on others' cultures.
The sociology of knowledge examines the social and group origin of ideas, arguing that the entire “ideational realm” (“knowledges,” ideas, ideologies, mentalities) develops within the context of a society's groups and institutions. Its ideas address broad sociological questions about the extent and limits of social and group influence through an examination of the social and cultural foundations of cognition and perception. Despite significant changes over time, classical and contemporary studies in the sociology of knowledge share a common theme: the social foundations of thought. Ideas, concepts, and belief systems share an intrinsic sociality explained by the contexts in which they emerge.
Purpose - People do not just interact, with each other; rather, they engage with each other using the visual and verbal instrumentations of communication at their disposal, constructing meaningful and intelligible conversations with differing degrees of precision of intention and clarity of expression. In doing this, they employ the "fundamental features of language," described in various semiotic and structuralist theories.Methodology - Here, we synthesize and integrate the key aspects of these language theories in an attempt to apply them to everyday conversations. The language features in question are routinely put into play by human agents to convey attitudes, emotions, opinions, and information and to achieve an engagement with the other.Findings - Human relations, expansive in their range and intricate in their forms, demand complex instrumentations with which to conduct them. These instrumentations are essential features of the linguistic socialization of human agents, integral to both memory and habits of speech.
An introduction to the ways that sociologists understand what is and how it operates in groups, communities, institutions, and entire societies. The course begins with classic and contemporary readings in cultural studies in order to arrive at a working understanding of how culture is conceptualized and studied in the sciences and humanities today. The new sociology of culture—a number of distinct subfields including studies of science, knowledge, popular culture, media, and the arts—has come to occupy a more central place in sociology and to influence other disciplines as well. Some of its important presuppositions include: the idea that culture includes the realm of material life and practices; that culture is embedded in all institutions and social structures (culture is not to be confined to older notions of the ideal, ideological, or nonmaterial); the idea that culture is something produced and constructed—both by ordinary actors and by groups and institutions with varying degrees of authority and power; the domain of culture today includes recorded cultures (Diana Crane’s term), that is, culture is something recorded in print, film, electronic media, and artifacts. This notion draws attention to the explicit role of producers of culture—from politics and journalism to entertainment and art—in what becomes in our societies today.
An introduction to the expanding field of the sociology of knowledge and culture, including a discussion of the reasons for the resurgence of culture into the forefront of our understanding. The course is principally a course in the ways that sociologists and other social scientists have conceptualized and studied the relationship of mind and society: how socialization and internalization of cultural forms (language, knowledge, ideas, concepts, and entire worldviews) occurs and how human beings shape and are shaped by their social worlds (the problem of human agency). Social theories of the self and identity are also covered, including contemporary discussions of the politics of identity within postmodernity and globalization and the emergence of social movements of nations, sexualities, ethnicities, and women.
Modern selfhood or identity is studied as a series of conflicts and dilemmas, those of public and private life, of (or community) and the individual, the conflict of rationality over emotionality (and control and release), of personal freedom (choice) and social control; and the more recent conflicts concerning personal freedom and individuality (and the individual’s mind) in the face of the growth of mass society and its mass culture. In various texts and discourses—modern novels, political and sociological treatises, films, personal memoirs—these conflicts are given expression and can be studied as a modern and postmodern discourse about selfhood today. In and through various texts and images we can begin to address the question, is a self today? What are the special problems, dilemmas of our worlds and ourselves as modern and postmodern subjects?