BACKGROUND:We designed a tool to measure the rate and appropriateness of intensive care unit (ICU) nursing coverage as a proxy for the use of resources. METHODS:We tested the tool in 32 Italian ICUs during a cross-sectional study (4 days/week, October 2001 and April 2002). The level of care was classified as high or low. The appropriate patient-to-nurse ratio for both levels (2/1 and 3/1 in this ICU mix) was defined. The provided and theoretical nurse assistance was computed, the difference between the two quantifying the ICU use of personnel: a positive difference means over-utilization, a negative one under-utilization. We calculated the maximum number of high-level and low-level care days available for ICU and the relative utilization rates. These two rates quantify the appropriateness of resource use in relation to the planned use. RESULTS:Analysing 5783 treatment-days, the tool identified units using almost all available resources (five), overcrowded (14: too small units) or empty (16: too big). Units were overcrowded on account of the high-level of care required (five: utilization rate >100%) or reallocated too much of their residual high-care nursing capacity to low-level care (six). In empty units both utilization rates were lower than expected. CONCLUSIONS:The method quantifies the rate and appropriateness of resource usage and suggests the best management in units with fixed human resources or a fixed number of beds.

STUDY OBJECTIVES:Noninvasive ventilation, although effective as treatment for patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema when prolonged for hours, is of limited use in the emergency department (ED). The aim of the study was to determine whether a short attempt at noninvasive pressure support ventilation avoids ICU admittance and to identify lack of response prediction variables.DESIGN:Prospective inception cohort study.SETTING:ED of a university hospital.PATIENTS:Fifty-eight consecutive patients with cardiogenic pulmonary edema who had been unresponsive to medical treatment and were admitted between January 1999 and December 2000.INTERVENTIONS:Pressure support ventilation was instituted through a full-face mask until the resolution of respiratory failure. A 15-min "weaning test" was performed to evaluate clinical stability. Responder patients were transferred to a medical ward. Nonresponding patients were intubated and were admitted to the ICU.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:The included optimal length of intervention, the avoidance of ICU admittance, the incidence of myocardial infarction, and predictive lack of response criteria.RESULTS:Patients completed the trial (mean [+/- SD] duration, 96 +/- 40 min). None of the responders (43 patients; 74%) was subsequently ventilated or was admitted to the ICU. Two new episodes of myocardial infarction were observed. Thirteen of 58 patients died. A mean arterial pressure of < 95 mm Hg (odds ratio [OR], 10.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8 to 60.8; p < 0.01) and COPD (OR, 9.4; 95% CI, 1.6 to 54.0; p < 0.05) at baseline predicted the lack of response to noninvasive ventilation.CONCLUSIONS:A short attempt at noninvasive ventilation is effective in preventing invasive assistance. A 15-min weaning test can identify patients who will not need further invasive ventilatory support. COPD and hypotension at baseline are negative predictive criteria.