Objective. Heart transplantation (HT) due to valvular cardiornyopathy is rare, namely, about 3% of cases in the Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Usually, these patients present some risk factors such as previous valvular operations and pulmonary hypertension. Since there are few studies in the literature, we retrospectively analyzed our early and long-term results.Materials and Methods. We studied our experience in 22 HT cases for valvular cardiomyopathy (9.3% of our total experience), namely, 12 men and 10 women, of overall mean age of 52.6 +/- 1.0 years. Five patients had mitral; 8, aortic; and 1, tricuspid valve disease; 7 had double valve disease and 1, triple valve disease. Nineteen patients (87%) had been operated previously between 1 and 4 times. The mean ejection fraction was 23% +/- 7.3% and the mean New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class was 3.7. Fifty-three percent of the patients had pulmonary hypertension. Two patients were operated as an emergency "O." We used the standard HT technique.Results. Four patients (18%) were reoperated due to hemorrhage. The hospital mortality was 2 cases (9%). Another patients (9%) died on follow-up due to cardiac allograft vasculopathy. All surviving patients have been followed to the end of 2006. The mean follow-up has been 72 +/- 53 months. They are functional class I or II.Conclusions. HT for this indication was more frequent in our experience than in the Registry of the ISHLT. The immediate and long-term results were good, with an 82% mean survival at 6 years. HT can be a good treatment for patients with valvular cardiornyopathy and bad ventricular function and/or multiple valvular reoperations.

Introduction and objectives. Surgical revascularization is the treatment of choice in patients with left main coronary artery stenosis. Conventional stents are not a valid alternative because of the rate of restenosis and sudden cardiac death. Drug-eluting stents, which reduce the rate of restenosis, may represent an alternative to cardiac surgery. The objective of this study was to describe the results with drug-eluting stents in patients with left main coronary artery stenosis who were poor candidates for surgical revascularization.Patients and method. We prospectively followed a consecutive series of patients who were poor candidates for surgical revascularization and were treated with implantation of a drug-eluting stent in the left main coronary artery between May 2002 and April 2004. In-hospital and long-term results were analyzed. Follow-up included angiographic and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies.Results. Forty-two patients (25 men, 59.5%) with a mean age of 70.1 (10.5) years were studied. Fourteen (33%) had diabetes, and 7 (16.7%) had a protected left main coronary artery. The reasons for ruling out surgery were poor distal vessels in 19 (45.2%), previous surgery in 9 (21.4%), age in 6 (14.3%), primary angioplasty in 5 (111.4%), and other reasons in 3 (7.2%). Four patients (9.5%) died before discharge, three of them after primary angioplasty. No in-hospital revascularization procedures were needed. Median follow-up time was 288 days; mean follow-up time was 315 (241) days. Another four patients died after discharge (9.5%) on days 5, 24, 34 and 115. Angioplasty was repeated in one patient, and another was referred for heart transplantation.Conclusions. Drug-eluting stents represent a valid alternative in patients with left main coronary artery stenosis who are poor candidates for surgical revascularization. Randomized studies with a longer follow-up should be performed to evaluate their benefits in patients eligible for surgery.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has a better clinical profile than azathioprine in heart transplantation (HT). Forty-five recipients (aged 53 +/- 9 yr) were retrospectively evaluated (first year of follow-up) post-MMF introduction since its advent in 1997 (mean daily dose: 1.97 +/- 0.2 g). MMF was used (mean post-HT time: 40 +/- 27 months) for: (i) renal insufficiency attenuation (group 1 = 20); (ii) steroid reduction because of osteoporosis (group 2 = 12); (iii) treatment of persistent cellular rejection (group 3 = 7) and vascular graft disease (VGD) (group 4 = 6). Mean changes (groups 1-2) were: creatinine 172 +/- 59, 158 +/- 51, 153 +/- 57 mumol/L (at baseline, 6 and 12 months, respectively; p < 0.001). Cyclosporine daily dose: 219 +/- 37, 166 +/- 46, 176 +/- 98 mg, respectively (p < 0.001). Cyclosporine blood concentration: 151 +/- 40, 103 +/- 41, 83 +/- 34 ng/mL, respectively (p < 0.004). Prednisone daily dose: 8.3 +/- 2, 5.2 +/- 1, 4.1 +/- 1 mg, respectively (p < 0.001). Cellular rejection (group 3) was successfully treated (86%) but the outcome of VGD did not improve after the switch (group 4). Our limited experience (with caution) confirms the reported benefits of MMF particularly attenuating renal insufficiency.