This chapter provides a concise narrative of the evolution of events that have led to the current widely accepted concept of cholinergic neurotransmission. It recounts the saga of a century of intense research, technologic innovations, and fundamental discoveries, highlighting the contributions of key figures who have provoked ongoing intellectual challenges and scientific disputes regarding the physiologic significance of cholinergic transmission. Additionally, the chapter describes the resolution of decades-old debates surrounding the hypothesis of electrical vs chemical neurotransmission-a debate that has shaped current fundamental concepts and garnered several Nobel Prizes.

Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI) represent the drug of choice for Alzheimer's disease (AD) treatment. They produce significant improvement on cognitive as well as non-cognitive function for a period up to 1 year during the first 3 years following clinical diagnosis. The magnitude of cognitive improvements is similar for different ChEI, however, differences are seen with regard to incidence and severity of side effects, optimal ChE inhibition, pharmacokinetic properties and mode of administration.

Currently, enhancement of cholinergic neurotransmission via cholinesterase inhibitors represents the main available approach to treat cognitive and behavioural symptoms of the early as well as late stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Restoring the cholinergic system has been a primary means of improving cognition in Alzheimer’s disease, as four of the six approved therapies are acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Memantine is an N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist with a well-documented clinical effect on behavioural symptoms, which is often added to cholinesterase inhibitors to potentiate their effect and aducanumab, targeting the amyloid pathology, has recently been approved. The early, progressive and selective degeneration of the cholinergic system together and its close relation to cognitive deficits supports the use of cholinergic therapy for Alzheimer’s disease. This review provides an updated view of the basal forebrain cholinergic system, its relation to cognition and its relevance for therapy of Alzheimer’s disease. It deals with the three main aspects that form the basis of the cholinergic-oriented therapy of Alzheimer’s disease, its origin, its mechanism of action, its clinical effects, advantages and limits of a cholinergic therapeutic approach. It includes a new and updated overview of the involvement of muscarinic receptors in Alzheimer’s disease as well as the recent development of new and highly selective M1 muscarinic receptor agonists with disease-modifying potential. It also addresses the discovery of a novel nerve growth factor metabolic pathway responsible for the trophic maintenance of the basal forebrain system and its deregulation in Alzheimer’s disease. It discusses new clinical studies and provides evidence for the long-term efficacy of cholinesterase inhibitor therapy suggesting a disease-modifying effect of these drugs. The classical symptomatic cholinergic therapy based on cholinesterase inhibitors is judiciously discussed for its maximal efficacy and best clinical application. The review proposes new alternatives of cholinergic therapy that should be developed to amplify its clinical effect and supplement the disease-modifying effect of new treatments to slow down or arrest disease progression.

When Alzheimer's disease (AD) disease-modifying therapies will be available, global healthcare systems will be challenged by a large-scale demand for clinical and biological screening. Validation and qualification of globally accessible, minimally-invasive, and time-, cost-saving blood-based biomarkers need to be advanced. Novel pathophysiological mechanisms (and related candidate biomarkers) - including neuroinflammation pathways (TREM2 and YKL-40), axonal degeneration (neurofilament light chain protein), synaptic dysfunction (neurogranin, synaptotagmin, alpha-synuclein, and SNAP-25) - may be integrated into an expanding pathophysiological and biomarker matrix and, ultimately, integrated into a comprehensive blood-based liquid biopsy, aligned with the evolving ATN + classification system and the precision medicine paradigm. Liquid biopsy-based diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms are increasingly employed in Oncology disease-modifying therapies and medical practice, showing an enormous potential for AD and other brain diseases as well. For AD and other neurodegenerative diseases, newly identified aberrant molecular pathways have been identified as suitable therapeutic targets and are currently investigated by academia/industry-led R&D programs, including the nerve-growth factor pathway in basal forebrain cholinergic neurons, the sigmal receptor, and the GTPases of the Rho family. Evidence for a clinical long-term effect on cognitive function and brain health span of cholinergic compounds, drug candidates for repositioning programs, and non-pharmacological multidomain interventions (nutrition, cognitive training, and physical activity) is developing as well. Ultimately, novel pharmacological paradigms, such as quantitative systems pharmacology-based integrative/explorative approaches, are gaining momentum to optimize drug discovery and accomplish effective pathway-based strategies for precision medicine. This article is part of the special issue on 'The Quest for Disease-Modifying Therapies for Neurodegenerative Disorders'

Scientific evidence collected over the past 4 decades suggests that a loss of cholinergic innervation in the cerebral cortex of patients with Alzheimer's disease is an early pathogenic event correlated with cognitive impairment. This evidence led to the formulation of the "Cholinergic Hypothesis of AD" and the development of cholinesterase inhibitor therapies. Although approved only as symptomatic therapies, recent studies suggest that long-term use of these drugs may also have disease-modifying benefits. A Cholinergic System Workgroup reassessed the role of the cholinergic system on AD pathogenesis in light of recent data, including neuroimaging data charting the progression of neurodegeneration in the cholinergic system and suggesting that cholinergic therapy may slow brain atrophy. Other pathways that contribute to cholinergic synaptic loss and their effect on cognitive impairment in AD were also reviewed. These studies indicate that the cholinergic system as one of several interacting systems failures that contribute to AD pathogenesis.

This review has two aims. First, to examine whether or not sex and gender may influence the brain cholinergic system in animals and in humans. Second, to examine the available evidence of sexually dimorphic response to the therapeutic and toxic effects of cholinesterase inhibitors. Animal research reveals no marked difference in the general morphology of the brain cholinergic system but subtle functional gender differences have been reported. In humans, gender differences in nucleus basalis of Meynert (NBM) exist. In animals, some cholinergic neurons express estrogen alpha receptors in females and androgens in males. It is known that sex hormones exert trophic effects on the cholinergic system. Females show higher frontal cortex cholinergic activity whereas males have higher activity in the hippocampus. Gender differences in the pharmacological effects result in higher sensitivity to the toxic effects of organophosphate cholinesterase inhibitors in males. A stronger and more selective benefit of ChEI treatment in AD has been reported in men by several authors. Sex and estrogen receptor phenotype may both influence the response to donepezil and rivastigmine. Hence, aged male and female individuals might respond differently to ChEI due to either sex-specific differences in structures and function of the cholinergic system, pharmacokinetics, memory function or in the way aging or AD affects these processes.

Cholinergic synapses are ubiquitous in the human central nervous system. Their high density in the thalamus, striatum, limbic system, and neocortex suggest that cholinergic transmission is likely to be critically important for memory, learning, attention and other higher brain functions. Several lines of research suggest additional roles for cholinergic systems in overall brain homeostasis and plasticity. As such, the brain’s cholinergic system occupies a central role in ongoing research related to normal cognition and age-related cognitive decline, including dementias such as Alzheimer’s disease. The cholinergic hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease centres on the progressive loss of limbic and neocortical cholinergic innervation. Neurofibrillary degeneration in the basal forebrain is believed to be the primary cause for the dysfunction and death of forebrain cholinergic neurons, giving rise to a widespread presynaptic cholinergic denervation. Cholinesterase inhibitors increase the availability of acetylcholine at synapses in the brain and are one of the few drug therapies that have been proven clinically useful in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease dementia, thus validating the cholinergic system as an important therapeutic target in the disease. This review includes an overview of the role of the cholinergic system in cognition and an updated understanding of how cholinergic deficits in Alzheimer’s disease interact with other aspects of disease pathophysiology, including plaques composed of amyloid-β proteins. This review also documents the benefits of cholinergic therapies at various stages of Alzheimer’s disease and during long-term follow-up as visualized in novel imaging studies. The weight of the evidence supports the continued value of cholinergic drugs as a standard, cornerstone pharmacological approach in Alzheimer’s disease, particularly as we look ahead to future combination therapies that address symptoms as well as disease progression.

Alzheimer disease (AD) is characterized by wide heterogeneity in cognitive and behavioural syndromes, risk factors and pathophysiological mechanisms. Addressing this phenotypic variation will be crucial for the development of precise and effective therapeutics in AD. Sex-related differences in neural anatomy and function are starting to emerge, and sex might constitute an important factor for AD patient stratification and personalized treatment. Although the effects of sex on AD epidemiology are currently the subject of intense investigation, the notion of sex-specific clinicopathological AD phenotypes is largely unexplored. In this Review, we critically discuss the evidence for sex-related differences in AD symptomatology, progression, biomarkers, risk factor profiles and treatment. The cumulative evidence reviewed indicates sex-specific patterns of disease manifestation as well as sex differences in the rates of cognitive decline and brain atrophy, suggesting that sex is a crucial variable in disease heterogeneity. We discuss critical challenges and knowledge gaps in our current understanding. Elucidating sex differences in disease phenotypes will be instrumental in the development of a 'precision medicine' approach in AD, encompassing individual, multimodal, biomarker-driven and sex-sensitive strategies for prevention, detection, drug development and treatment.

There is great interest in the use of biomarkers to assist in the timely identification of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in individuals with mild symptoms. However, the inclusion of AD biomarkers in clinical criteria poses socioethical challenges. The Geneva Task Force for the Roadmap of Alzheimer's Biomarkers was established to deliver a systematic strategic research agenda (aka roadmap) to promote efficient and effective validation of AD biomarkers and to foster their uptake in clinical practice. In this article, we summarize the workshop discussion of the Geneva Task Force “ethical and societal issues” working group, which comprised bioethicists, clinicians, health economists, and representatives of those affected by AD. The working group identified the following key issues that need to be included in the roadmap: improving access to services through timely diagnosis, the need for a diagnostic research protocol before moving to clinical routine, recruitment in diagnostic research protocols in the absence of effective therapy, respect for the autonomy of the individual with mild cognitive impairment in information and consent process and the right not to know biomarkers results, need for counseling programs, disclosure of the diagnosis in a structured environment and the involvement of family members, health policies including the individuals' views and the protection of their interests, and the economic costs for society.

The diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease can be improved by the use of biological measures. Biomarkers of functional impairment, neuronal loss, and protein deposition that can be assessed by neuroimaging (ie, MRI and PET) or CSF analysis are increasingly being used to diagnose Alzheimer's disease in research studies and specialist clinical settings. However, the validation of the clinical usefulness of these biomarkers is incomplete, and that is hampering reimbursement for these tests by health insurance providers, their widespread clinical implementation, and improvements in quality of health care. We have developed a strategic five-phase roadmap to foster the clinical validation of biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease, adapted from the approach for cancer biomarkers. Sufficient evidence of analytical validity (phase 1 of a structured framework adapted from oncology) is available for all biomarkers, but their clinical validity (phases 2 and 3) and clinical utility (phases 4 and 5) are incomplete. To complete these phases, research priorities include the standardisation of the readout of these assays and thresholds for normality, the evaluation of their performance in detecting early disease, the development of diagnostic algorithms comprising combinations of biomarkers, and the development of clinical guidelines for the use of biomarkers in qualified memory clinics.

BACKGROUND/AIMS:Investigations of Aβ oligomers in neuropathologically confirmed Alzheimer's disease (AD) are still scarce. We report neurohistopathological and biochemical analyses using antibodies against tau and amyloid β (Aβ) pathology.METHODS:Thirty elderly AD patients and 43 age-matched controls with or without deposition of amyloid plaques (AP) were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. In 21 cases with available fresh tissue, Western blots were also performed. Neuropathological analysis included quantitative assessment of neurofibrillary tangles (NFT), AP and Aβ oligomer densities in the mesial temporal cortex (TC).RESULTS:NFT, fibrillar amyloid and Aβ oligomeric deposit densities were significantly higher in AD patients than in controls. There was no relationship between oligomeric Aβ densities and Braak NFT staging scores. Furthermore, Aβ oligomer expression was closely correlated with Aβ plaques in the TC. By Western blot, Aβ oligomers were observed in AD patients, in plaque-free controls, in 1 'tangle-only AD' case, as well as in the cerebellum. A band near 55 kDa was the only Western blot signal that was significantly increased in the TC of AD patients compared to controls as well as less expressed in the cerebellum.CONCLUSION:These results suggest that a putative dodecamer, near 55 kDa, may contribute to AD vulnerability of the TC.

The diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is shifting from a clinical to a clinicalpathological paradigm. Biomarkers of Alzheimer's pathology (hippocampal atrophy on MR, cortical hypometabolismon FDGPET, decreased Abeta42 and increased tau and phosphotau in CSF, and increased amyloid and Tau ligands uptake on PET) are at different stages of development. The lack of coordinated development at the European and global level is delaying authorization by regulatory agencies, reimbursement by payers, implementation in the clinic, and ultimately the development of effective treatments. Objective: Outlining the actions required to accelerate this course. A group of European AD biomarker and international cancer biomarker experts adapted a 5phase framework for biomarker development used in oncology to AD biomarkers. The 5 sequential phases include: 1) pilot studies, 2) clinical assay development for clinical disease, 3) prospective longitudinal repository studies, 4) prospective diagnostic studies, and 5) disease control studies. Current maturity of biomarkers according to this framework was assessed from available literature on: neuropsychology; amyloidPET; TauPET; CSF Abeta42, tau and phosphotau; FDGPET; hippocampal atrophy, 123IIoflupane and 123IMIBG. Literature evidence shows that all biomarkers validation studies fulfil Phase 1. The aims of phases 2 and 3 are addressed inconsistently and studies do not systematically follow the sequential order of the phases. Only preliminary evidence is available for some Phase 4 aims for amyloidPET, CSF biomarkers, hippocampal atrophy, and FDG PET. Phase 5 aims have never been addressed. Compared to other biomarkers, FDGPET and Amyloid imaging are at a relatively advanced stage of validation, while 123IIoflupane and 123IMIBG SPECT validity studies are relatively less advanced, TauPET being at a very initial stage of validation (Figure).

Neuropathological hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease (AD) include tangles (NFT) and beta amyloid (Aβ) plaques. Despite numerous neuropathological studies that assessed the relationship of cognitive decline with neuropathologic lesions, their correlation still remains unclear. NFTs and Aβ plaques have been widely implicated and described in normal aging. The number of NFTs in the CA1 and the entorhinal cortex seems to be more closely related to cognitive status, compared to the amyloid load whose role still remains controversial in the AD. In this review, we refer to our main studies performed in Geneva during the past two decades attempting to assess the correlation of pathology with clinical expression. The theory of cognitive reserve has been proposed for further understanding of interindividual differences in terms of compensation despite the presence of pathological lesions. The increasing prevalence of the AD, the limitations of actual treatments, as well as the high public cost reflect the imperative need for better therapeutic and early diagnosis strategies in the future.

Worldwide multidisciplinary translational research has led to a growing knowledge of the genetics and molecular pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) indicating that pathophysiological brain alterations occur decades before clinical signs and symptoms of cognitive decline can be diagnosed. Consequently, therapeutic concepts and targets have been increasingly focused on early-stage illness before the onset of dementia; and distinct classes of compounds are now being tested in clinical trials. At present, there is a growing consensus that therapeutic progress in AD delaying disease progression would significantly decrease the expanding global burden. The evolving hypothesis- and evidence-based generation of new diagnostic research criteria for early-stage AD has positively impacted the development of clinical trial designs and the characterization of earlier and more specific target populations for trials in prodromal as well as in pre- and asymptomatic at-risk stages of AD.

In cognitively intact individuals and patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) the formation of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), senile plaques (SPs), and the synaptic loss characterizes the neuropathology of brain aging. There is a differential cortical vulnerability to the degenerative process in extreme brain aging. In the oldest-old population the distribution and the severity of NFTs and SPs could be different compared to younger persons.

Physical exercise has frequently been the target of research studies related to the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. The level and routine of physical exercise can influence the progression of the disease, as well as influence the intensity of the deleterious effects from Alzheimer's disease. The objective of this article is to introduce the reader to this subject and point out the main findings in scientific literature related to physical exercise and its effects on Alzheimer's disease. This article will identify the general characteristics of the disease, the exercise programs currently used, and the main effects for each of these topics. It will also address a very current topic related to this issue, blood markers, and other techniques for future studies with this population.