Introduction: Based on the commonality in cognitive clinical theories of OCD and cognitive dissonance theory regarding threat to self (Wright & Riskind, 2021), this preliminary study investigated whether (1) OCD-related distress catalyzed by ego-dystonic intrusive unwanted thoughts is akin to cognitive dissonance, and (2) distress and negative appraisals of the simulated intrusive thoughts can be alleviated by a values-based self-affirmation exercise developed in the dissonance literature. Methods: Nonclinical college students (N = 93) were presented with a simulated intrusive thought induction. After rating their distress from writing the simulated intrusion, they were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: neutralization used in the clinical literature, a values-based self-affirmation task, a combination of neutralization followed by self-affirmation, or a control condition. Results: The results revealed that the group that combined a neutralizing exercise followed by a self-affirmation exercise displayed a significantly greater decrease in dissonance-like distress and negative appraisals of the simulated intrusion than the other three groups. The groups that received self-affirmation alone or neutralization alone did not appear to reduce distress on their own. The combined group and other groups did not show rebound distress. Discussion: These novel analogue study findings help to bring cognitive clinical models of OCD and cognitive dissonance theory closer together. Moreover, they introduce the possibility that self-affirmation procedures could provide useful secondary ways to augment current OCD treatment protocols.
Despite strong evidence of their effectiveness in reducing symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), prolonged exposure therapy (PE) and cognitive processing therapy (CPT) remain challenging for some service members and veterans to access and complete. Delivering PE and CPT in time-condensed or "massed" formats may reduce barriers to receiving care. PE and CPT have now been implemented across a range of tempos (e.g., multiple sessions per day across 1 week, one session per day for 3 weeks) and to multiple target populations, in a variety of contexts from individual therapy alone to full intensive outpatient programs. A massed format of treatment delivery has advantages for both patients and providers, including quicker time to recovery, less opportunity for avoidance, and improved treatment completion rates. The time-limited nature of massed treatment also creates accompanying challenges, such as less time to practice homework and greater impact when factors delay or disrupt progress. This paper discusses lessons learned from providers across diverse settings who are experienced in both delivering massed PE and CPT and managing such programs, primarily with military populations.
The purpose of this study was to examine differences between military veterans and service members with and without a psychiatric assistance dog (PAD) who were receiving cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Six hundred eighty-two military veterans presented at a 2-week intensive, outpatient CBT program for PTSD from February 2016 to February 2020. Self-reports of symptoms and rates of treatment completion by PAD ownership were assessed. Patients with PADs ( n = 93) reported higher scores on the PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) ( P = .04; Cohen's d = 0.23) and Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory ( P < .01; Cohen's d = 0.34) at baseline. PTSD symptom change was comparable between participants with and without PADs ( P > .05). Dropout was higher among owners of PADs, but this difference was not significant ( P = .11). Among military populations, those with PADs may experience more severe PTSD and neuro-cognitive symptoms, but having a PAD was not associated with treatment outcome in intensive CBT. [ Psychiatr Ann . 2022;52(5):191–198.]
Suicide-bereaved military widows can struggle with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and prolonged grief. Intimate partner violence survivors (IPV) are particularly at risk. We examined whether IPV impacts outcomes in a two-week intensive outpatient program for N = 50 suicide-bereaved military widows. Mixed-model regressions were employed to examine the effects of IPV, time, and their interaction on symptoms. Thirty-four percent experienced IPV perpetrated by their deceased veteran. Symptoms improved at post-treatment (ps < .001), one-month (ps < .01), and three-month follow-up (ps< .001). There was no significant effect of IPV or significant interaction (ps > .05), indicating that IPV survivors also benefitted from treatment.
The Psychiatric Consultation Service at Massachusetts General Hospital sees medical and surgical inpatients with comorbid psychiatric symptoms and conditions. During their twice-weekly rounds, Dr Stern and other members of the Consultation Service discuss diagnosis and management of hospitalized patients with complex medical or surgical problems who also demonstrate psychiatric symptoms or conditions. These discussions have given rise to rounds reports that will prove useful for clinicians practicing at the interface of medicine and psychiatry.
Reports an error in "The effects of web-prolonged exposure among military personnel and veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder" by Carmen P. McLean, Edna B. Foa, Katherine A. Dondanville, Christopher K. Haddock, Madeleine L. Miller, Sheila A. M. Rauch, Jeffery S. Yarvis, Edward C. Wright, Brittany N. Hall-Clark, Brooke A. Fina, Brett T. Litz, Jim Mintz, Stacey Young-McCaughan and Alan L. Peterson (Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 2021[Sep], Vol 13[6], 621-631). In the original article, "for the STRONG STAR Consortium" was missing from the end of the author line. In addition, the numbering and text of the affiliations for Edward C. Wright, Brittany N. Hall-Clark, Brooke A. Fina, Brett T. Litz, Jim Mintz, Stacey Young-McCaughan, and Alan L. Peterson were incorrect because of duplicated affiliation details and associated typographical errors. Finally, in the References, "for the STRONG STAR Consortium" and "on behalf of the STRONG STAR Consortium" were missing from the ends of the author lists for Foa et al. (2018) and Resick et al. (2015), respectively. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2020-86687-001).OBJECTIVE:Web-based treatments address many of the logistical and stigma-related barriers to in-person behavioral health care. Prior studies of web-based treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) did not employ gold-standard treatments and have not compared to in-person therapy.METHOD:We compared a web version of Prolonged Exposure Therapy, "Web-PE," to in-person Present-Centered Therapy (PCT) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with 40 military personnel with PTSD seeking treatment at Fort Hood, Texas. Due to recruitment challenges, we terminated the RCT and subsequently examined the effects of Web-PE in an uncontrolled open trial with 34 service members and veterans recruited nationwide. Both studies assessed PTSD, depressive symptoms, and health functioning at baseline and 1 and 3 months posttreatment; the RCT also included a 6-month assessment.RESULTS:Results of the RCT showed no differential impact for Web-PE and PCT, although more PCT participants achieved clinically significant change at one of the follow-up assessments. Both treatment conditions significantly reduced self-reported and blind independent interviewer-assessed symptoms of PTSD. Results of the open trial showed that Web-PE was associated with significant reductions in self-reported PTSD symptoms, with a much larger effect size than in the RCT.CONCLUSIONS:Web-PE significantly reduced PTSD symptoms in both studies, although the reductions in PTSD symptoms were greater among open trial participants, who were specifically seeking a web-based treatment. Future research should evaluate Web-PE relative to another web-based treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
The unprecedented effects and duration of the COVID-19 crisis are likely to elevate the population's level of anxiety due to psychological stress, economic hardship, and social isolation. This effect may be especially potent for individuals with preexisting mental health conditions, such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Prolonged Exposure (PE) therapy is a highly effective treatment for PTSD across trauma-exposed populations, and has been implemented effectively via telehealth. Nevertheless, PE implementation via telehealth may require specific adaptations during the COVID-19 crisis due to public health mandates calling for sheltering in place and physical distancing. This paper discusses strategies for implementing PE for PTSD during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may also be applied to other situations in which physical distancing must be considered.
Many returning military service members and veterans who were deployed following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks (9/11) suffer from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and insomnia. Although intensive treatment programs for PTSD have shown promise in the treatment of PTSD symptoms, recent research has demonstrated that sleep disturbance shows little improvement following intensive trauma-focused treatment. The aim of the present study was to evaluate changes in self-reported insomnia symptoms among veterans and service members following participation in a 2-week intensive program for PTSD. We further aimed to investigate if residual PTSD symptoms, specifically hyperarousal, were associated with residual insomnia symptoms. Participants (N = 326) completed self-report assessments of insomnia, PTSD symptoms, and depressive symptoms at pre- and posttreatment. At pretreatment, 73.9% of participants (n = 241) met the criteria for moderate or severe insomnia, whereas at posttreatment 67.7% of participants (n = 203) met the criteria. Results of paired t tests demonstrated statistically significant differences between pre- and posttreatment Insomnia Severity Index scores; however, the effect size was small, d = 0.34. Analyses revealed that posttreatment hyperarousal symptoms were associated with posttreatment insomnia. These findings suggest that although an intensive program for service members and veterans with PTSD may significantly reduce insomnia symptoms, clinically meaningful residual insomnia symptoms remain. Further research is warranted to elucidate the association between residual hyperarousal and insomnia symptoms following intensive trauma-focused treatment.
Objectives: Given that veterans are significantly more likely to suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), traumatic brain injury (TBI), depression, and anxiety than civilians, yet current gold-standard treatments for PTSD are not effective for all patients, the present study sought to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a collaborative songwriting intervention (CSI) while exploring its potential effectiveness in improving physical and mental health outcomes for veterans with PTSD. Design: Ten veterans took part in the CSI. A variety of pre- and postintervention measures were administered, including the Measurement of Current Status (MOCS), the Coping Expectancies Scale (CES), the Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Military (PCL-M), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Participants also wore a Fitbit to track average heart rate, sleep, and step count. Intervention: The CSI consisted of each veteran meeting with a professional songwriter, trained specifically for co-writing original material with the veteran population. There were three phases of songwriting that took about an hour and 15 min total. Veterans were instructed to listen to their song daily for 5 weeks. Results: Participants reported that the intervention was helpful and relevant to them, and most participants (95%) would refer others to this treatment. We found that the CSI reduced participant's PTSD symptoms (d = 0.869), specifically the Numbing (d = 0.853) and Hyperarousal (d = 1.077) subscales. Depressive symptoms (d = 0.72) and stress reactivity (d = 0.785) also marginally decreased. There was no significant change in physiological data (i.e., sleep, no. of steps) from pre- to postintervention. Conclusion: These data suggest that a CSI is an acceptable intervention for veterans with PTSD that may also improve their PTSD symptoms.
Cognitive-behavioral models of OCD and models of cognitive dissonance have converged in emphasizing how intrusive or dissonant thoughts conflict with – and therefore threaten - one's self-concept. In the present article, we review the rich history of theory on self-concept in OCD, culminating in the contemporary fear of self conceptualization. We then draw conceptual parallels between the internal psychological tension generated by intrusive thoughts, and the experience of cognitive dissonance. A review of the literature reveals considerable overlap between these two cognitive phenomena and demonstrates particular compatibility between self-affirmation theory and models of OCD in which fear of self is a central feature. Drawing on a theoretical synthesis of these literatures, it is suggested that cognitive dissonance research can provide insights that can be utilized to gain a deeper understanding of OCD. Potential applications of self-affirmation theory to OCD treatment are discussed.
Objective: Equine-assisted activities and therapies (EAATs) have been a growing adjunctive integrative health modality, as they allow participants to practice mindfulness, emotional regulation, and self-mastery or self-esteem building skills. Preliminary evidence suggests that these programs may be helpful in reducing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and depressive symptoms. The current study examines the acceptability of integrating an EAAT program as part of a two-week, intensive clinical program for veterans with PTSD and/or traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: A family member or support person could accompany veterans and participate in the program. One hundred and six participants (veteran n = 62, family n = 44) left the urban environment in an intensive outpatient program (IOP) to attend a two-day, weekend EAAT in rural New Hampshire. Satisfaction surveys were conducted on the last day of the program and examined using thematic analysis. Results: The following themes were reported in the surveys: ability of horses to catalyze emotional rehabilitation, effectiveness of immersion in equine-assisted activities, program's ability to foster interpersonal relationships and necessity of education about PTSD for staff. Participants also reported enjoying the program as highlighted by qualitative feedback, a mean score of 9.76 (standard deviation [SD] = 0.61) as reported by veterans and a mean score of 9.91 (SD = 0.29) as reported by family members on a 10-point visual analog scale with higher scores indicating a greater overall experience. Conclusion: These data offer preliminary evidence that an adjunct EAAT program is acceptable for veterans with PTSD and/or TBI participating in an IOP. (C) 2020 Shanghai Changhai Hospital. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE:While the comparative efficacy of prolonged exposure (PE) and cognitive processing therapy (CPT) has been examined in outpatient settings, there is a dearth of literature on the relative effectiveness of these interventions when adapted for an intensive treatment format. In an expanded secondary analysis of a previous study, we sought to examine the comparative effectiveness of PE and CPT delivered in the naturalistic setting of an intensive treatment format including maintenance of outcomes through a 6-month follow-up period. METHOD:A sample of 296 veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) received either PE (n = 186) or CPT (n = 90), alongside other trauma-informed interventions, in a 2-week intensive clinical program. Treatment selection was determined collaboratively between patient and therapist. Our primary outcome was self-reported PTSD symptom severity (i.e., PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, PCL-5); secondarily, we examined self-reported depression (i.e., Patient Health Questionnaire) symptom severity outcomes. RESULTS:A mixed-model regression controlling for age and gender revealed a significant effect of time from baseline to endpoint (p < .001), 3-month (p < .001), and 6-month follow-up (p < .001) on PCL-5 scores but no significant effect of treatment or effect of treatment by time interaction (all ps > .05; model: Wald's χ² = 232.38, p < .001). Results were similar for depression outcomes. Attrition at posttreatment was not significantly different between groups: 7.2% for CPT and 6.5% PE (z score = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS:Both PE and CPT are associated with comparable improvements when delivered as part of a 2-week intensive outpatient program. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Over 15 years of combat deployments to Afghanistan, Iraq, and surrounding locations have increased the risk of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in active-duty military service members, significantly amplibing the need for effective treatments within the military health care system. While effective evidence-based treatments for PTSD exist, results have not been as robust for service members and veterans as those found with civilians, suggesting that there are unique factors that may make PTSD in active military personnel more challenging to treat. Few clinical articles address military cultural aspects of the delivery of Prolonged Exposure therapy, especially with an active-duty military population. The aim of this paper is to highlight the role of military culture and lifestyle in PTSD symptom expression and recovery, and to provide clinical strategies to successfully conduct Prolonged Exposure with active-duty service members. Strategies to overcome logistical dculties and clinical techniques to address common themes that emerge in working with military populations are delineated. Case examples are provided to illustrate concepts.
Post-9/11 service members may return from military service with a complicated set of symptoms and conditions, such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, substance misuse, and traumatic brain injury (TBI), that interfere with reintegration and impair functioning. Although evidence-based treatments that facilitate recovery exist, their successful delivery at a sufficient dose is limited. Barriers to accessing treatment combined with challenges compiling a comprehensive treatment team further delay delivery of effective evidence-based care for PTSD, TBI, and co-occurring mental health conditions. This paper describes the development of a comprehensive, multidisciplinary, 2-week intensive day program for post-9/11 veterans with complex mental health concerns. The treatment program combines skill building groups, family education, and integrative health approaches with evidence-based individual PTSD or TBI care. Initial results from the first 132 participants were notable for a 97% completion rate, as well as statistically significant and clinically meaningful reductions in PTSD, neurobehavioral, and depression symptom severity for the 107 veterans who completed the PTSD track and the 21 who completed the TBI track. These data suggest the intensive program approach is an effective, well-tolerated model of treatment for post-9/11 veterans with PTSD and/or TBI. Future controlled studies should examine the effectiveness of this intensive model compared to standard evidence-based therapy delivery, as well as longitudinal outcomes.
Insomnia is highly prevalent among active-duty military service members. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) is a well-established and effective treatment; however, research and treatment recommendations have primarily focused on civilian or veteran populations. A multitude of military-specific factors directly impact service members’ sleep and the subsequent treatment recommendations. This article provides treatment considerations for the use of CBT-I with active-duty U.S. Army personnel. First, an overview of the theoretical model of insomnia, including military-specific predisposing, precipitating, and perpetuating factors, is presented, followed by a review of common comorbid conditions among service members with insomnia. Finally, discussion focuses on considerations and strategies for implementing components of CBT-I with service members, managing sleep during deployments, and adjusting sleep to accommodate overnight duties. Additional training resources and supplemental video examples (with actors) are provided.
Cognitive theories of OCD posit that individuals who develop clinically significant obsessions tend to make distorted appraisals of the negative significance of unwanted intrusive thoughts. To date, most research has focused on the implications that unwanted intrusive thoughts have for negative self-appraisals (e.g., being bad, mad, or dangerous). By contrast, the possible relationship between obsessional symptoms and expectations about the negative reactions of others to the intrusive thoughts has received little attention. The present studies provide evidence that anticipating negative reactions from others is predictive of the general negative significance of intrusive thoughts and adds to our ability to predict OCD symptoms. Using a sample of college student participants (N = 277), the first study found evidence that the expected negative reactions of other individuals contribute to the prediction of significant unique variance in both OCD symptoms and the negative significance of intrusive thoughts in college students. In a second study (M = 177), it was found that attributing malevolent traits (e.g., vengeful) to others accounted for significant variance in OCD symptoms, over and above the variance explained by the negative significance of thoughts. However, they did not account for variance in the negative significance of intrusive thoughts.
Importance:Effective and efficient treatment is needed for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in active duty military personnel. Objective:To examine the effects of massed prolonged exposure therapy (massed therapy), spaced prolonged exposure therapy (spaced therapy), present-centered therapy (PCT), and a minimal-contact control (MCC) on PTSD severity. Design, Setting, and Participants:Randomized clinical trial conducted at Fort Hood, Texas, from January 2011 through July 2016 and enrolling 370 military personnel with PTSD who had returned from Iraq, Afghanistan, or both. Final follow-up was July 11, 2016. Interventions:Prolonged exposure therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy involving exposure to trauma memories/reminders, administered as massed therapy (n = 110; 10 sessions over 2 weeks) or spaced therapy (n = 109; 10 sessions over 8 weeks); PCT, a non-trauma-focused therapy involving identifying/discussing daily stressors (n = 107; 10 sessions over 8 weeks); or MCC, telephone calls from therapists (n = 40; once weekly for 4 weeks). Main Outcomes and Measures:Outcomes were assessed before and after treatment and at 2-week, 12-week, and 6-month follow-up. Primary outcome was interviewer-assessed PTSD symptom severity, measured by the PTSD Symptom Scale-Interview (PSS-I; range, 0-51; higher scores indicate greater PTSD severity; MCID, 3.18), used to assess efficacy of massed therapy at 2 weeks posttreatment vs MCC at week 4; noninferiority of massed therapy vs spaced therapy at 2 weeks and 12 weeks posttreatment (noninferiority margin, 50% [2.3 points on PSS-I, with 1-sided α = .05]); and efficacy of spaced therapy vs PCT at posttreatment. Results:Among 370 randomized participants, data were analyzed for 366 (mean age, 32.7 [SD, 7.3] years; 44 women [12.0%]; mean baseline PSS-I score, 25.49 [6.36]), and 216 (59.0%) completed the study. At 2 weeks posttreatment, mean PSS-I score was 17.62 (mean decrease from baseline, 7.13) for massed therapy and 21.41 (mean decrease, 3.43) for MCC (difference in decrease, 3.70 [95% CI,0.72 to 6.68]; P = .02). At 2 weeks posttreatment, mean PSS-I score was 18.03 for spaced therapy (decrease, 7.29; difference in means vs massed therapy, 0.79 [1-sided 95% CI, -∞ to 2.29; P = .049 for noninferiority]) and at 12 weeks posttreatment was 18.88 for massed therapy (decrease, 6.32) and 18.34 for spaced therapy (decrease, 6.97; difference, 0.55 [1-sided 95% CI, -∞ to 2.05; P = .03 for noninferiority]). At posttreatment, PSS-I scores for PCT were 18.65 (decrease, 7.31; difference in decrease vs spaced therapy, 0.10 [95% CI, -2.48 to 2.27]; P = .93). Conclusions and Relevance:Among active duty military personnel with PTSD, massed therapy (10 sessions over 2 weeks) reduced PTSD symptom severity more than MCC at 2-week follow-up and was noninferior to spaced therapy (10 sessions over 8 weeks), and there was no significant difference between spaced therapy and PCT. The reductions in PTSD symptom severity with all treatments were relatively modest, suggesting that further research is needed to determine the clinical importance of these findings. Trial Registration:clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01049516.
Prolonged Exposure (PE) Therapy receives most of its empirical support from trials conducted with civilian posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) populations. There has been only limited research on its use with military personnel with combat-related PTSD, and as a consequence, there has been less clinical discussion detailing its application with active duty service members. The purpose of this paper is to highlight two challenges that commonly arise when conducting PE with active duty service members: 1) selecting the most appropriate index event to focus on in imaginal exposure out of the numerous traumas an active duty patient is likely to have experienced, and 2) patients’ tendency to engage in “safety behaviors,” which undermine the effectiveness of in vivo exposure. The nature of these challenges is explored from a theoretical perspective, along with two case examples to illustrate their presentation in treatment. Specific strategies for addressing them are reviewed.