Introduction: ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with a persistent high global mortality rate. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential to improve cardiac outcomes. Wearables may play a key role as promising technology in this clinical scenario. Methods: 70 consecutive patients were referred to coronary angiography (cath) due to typical chest pain and STEMI standard 12-lead ECG tracing. At cathlab, 4-electrodes-12-leads-wearable-smartphone-based-ECG-System(AngelUS®) tracing was performed. ECG tracings interpretations were compared between the 2 groups by independent cardiologists blinded to ECGs and then correlated with cath findings. The Cohen κ statistic was used to measure agreement between the 2 groups. Results: Both cardiologists agreed to include 70 standard ECG tracing and 70 AngelUS® ECG tracing as STEMI. Both cardiologists agreed to exclude 70 standard ECG tracing and 70 AngelUS® ECG tracing as absence of STEMI, showing a perfect agreement with Cohen’s k:1. Correlations with coronary angiography were also performed showing total agreement with both ECG diagnostics. Conclusion: In 70 consecutive patients with typical symptoms and STEMI, standard ECG and the AngelUS®4-Electrodes-12-Leads-Wearable-Smartphone-Based-ECG showed clinical agreement. Correlations with coronary angiography were also performed, showing clinical equivalence between both ECG diagnostics. Analysis of AngelUS® ECG tracing compared to standard ECG is ongoing, extending our investigation into the utility of this technology in preoperative ECGs.

Objectives: We sought to compare the adequacy of paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) and sirolimuseluting stent (SES) expansion based on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging criteria at conventional delivery pressures.Methods: Forty-six patients underwent SES implantation and 42 patients underwent PES implantation for de novo native coronary lesions <33 mm in length with reference lumen diameters of 2.5-3.5 mm. Stents were serially expanded with gradual balloon inflations at 14 and 20 atm. IVUS imaging was performed prior to intervention and after each balloon inflation. Stent expansion (minimal stent cross-sectional area/reference lumen cross-sectional area) was measured. Inadequate stent expansion was defined using the MUSIC criteria (all struts apposed, no tissue protrusion, and final lumen cross-sectional area >80% of the reference or 90% if minimal lumen cross-sectional area was <9 mm(2)).Results: The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar except for shorter lesion length, larger mean lumen cross-sectional area, larger lumen diameter, and lower plaque burden in the PES group. Stent expansion was inadequate in 80% of patients with SES versus 63% of patients with PES at 14 atm, although this was not statistically significant. After 20 atm, 48% of patients with SES remained underexpanded as compared with 35% of patients with PES.Conclusion: Drug-eluting stents showed significant underexpansion by MUSIC criteria at conventionally used inflation pressures. Higher balloon inflations are required especially during deployment of a SES. IVUS guidance is recommended to ensure optimal results and outcomes with both stents. (C) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Background: Bivalirudin is replacing heparin in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), including vascular brachytherapy (VBT). The aim of the study was to compare bivalirudin with eptifibatide in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) undergoing PCI and VBT.Methods: One hundred forty-four patients treated with bivalirudin as a single antithrombotic agent were compared with 150 patients treated with eptifibatide. Bivalirudin as a bolus of 0.75 mg/kg followed by 1.75 mg/kg/h infusion until the end of the procedure, and eptifibatide as a double bolus of 180 Ag/kg followed by 2 Ag/kg/min infusion for 18 h after the procedure were used. The main outcome measures were in-hospital events and 30-day clinical outcomes.Results: Baseline clinical characteristics were similar except that patients in the eptifibatide group were younger (P=.02) and had more saphenous vein graft lesions (P <.001). Patients in the bivalirudin group had a higher number of lesions in the right coronary artery (P <.001) and a higher number of vessels treated (P <.001). Postprocedure creatinine phosphokinase (CPK)-MB levels were significantly lower in the bivalirudin group (P <.03). In-hospital events showed significantly less minor bleeding (P=.01) and a trend toward lower major bleeding and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in the bivalirudin group (P=.06). Thirty-day outcomes showed a significantly lower incidence of non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) in the bivalirudin group (P=.004).Conclusion: Bivalirudin, as a single antithrombotic agent during PCI and VBT, is associated with significantly lower postprocedural CPK-MB elevation, minor bleeding complications, 30-day non-Q-wave MI rates, and a trend toward lower major bleeding and in-hospitalMACEwhen comparedwith eptifibatide. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Pre-treatment of patients with clopidogrel prior to coronary angiography (CAG) and possible percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a standard practice. Candidates for coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) are discharged or remain in the hospital until CABG after clopidogrel is discontinued. We investigated whether any differences exist in the rates of surgical complications and outcomes between these two groups of patients. We conclude that continued hospitalization of clopidogrel pre-treated patients does not confer any safety benefit with regard to post-operative complications and 30-day mortality. Discharging these patients after CAG may reduce hospitalization costs.

Whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) alone is safe in patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis (AS) and coexisting coronary artery disease (CAD), and whether aortic valve replacement (AVR) can be deferred in patients with moderate AS by undergoing PCI alone is not known. We conducted a retrospective study of surgically inoperable patients with AS who underwent PCI (moderate AS, n = 28; and severe AS, n = 28) and compared to those with AVR (n = 55). The clinical characteristics, procedural complications, in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes of PCI were compared. Baseline and procedural characteristics were similar except that lower age, hypertension, and renal impairment were seen in the AVR group. In-hospital complications were comparable among the 3 groups. Six-month and 1-year rates of myocardial infarction (MI), non-Q-wave MI, death and out-of-hospital death were similar between AVR and moderate AS patients (p = NS) and significantly high (p < 0.04) in patients with severe AS. On multivariate analysis, severe AS was the only significant predictor of 6-month and 1-year mortality. Our study suggests that PCI is safe in patients with moderate AS and coexisting CAD but is associated with poor outcomes in patients with severe AS.

BACKGROUND Factors leading to subacute vessel closure after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have not been well established in lesions treated with balloon angioplasty or atherectomy. METHODS AND RESULTS We used intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to determine the pre- and post-PCI characteristics involved in subacute vessel closure after PCI. Of 3,403 patients undergoing IVUS imaging during coronary balloon angioplasty or atherectomy, 8 patients (0.2%) developed angiographically documented subacute vessel closure within 1 week post-PCI and were compared to a group matched by procedure date (within 6 months), age, gender, stable or unstable angina, lesion location and treatment (balloon angioplasty or atherectomy). IVUS identified at least one cause for subacute vessel closure in 87% of patients (vs 25% in matched lesions, p < 0.01). Causes were all procedure-related and included inadequate final lumen (60%), dissection (50%) and thrombus (25%). Pre-procedure lesion characteristics were not different from matched lesions. CONCLUSIONS Subacute vessel closure after balloon angioplasty or atherectomy is mostly related to insufficient post-procedure lumen dimension or dissection.

Drug-eluting stents, since their approval in the United States, have become the treatment of choice for de novo coronary artery narrowing due to their ability to reduce restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization. We present two patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease; both patients were treated with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and bare metal stents (BMS).

BACKGROUND:Nonionic radiographic contrast media (CM) is reported to be thrombogenic while performing diagnostic or interventional procedures. To avoid thrombosis, heparin is often added to the CM. Bivalirudin, used to replace heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), is reported to be associated with reduced bleeding complications. We aimed to evaluate the impact of adding heparin to the CM during PCI in patients (pts) who underwent sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation when bivalirudin was utilized as the sole antithrombotic agent.METHODS:A total of 664 pts with 756 lesions underwent standard PCI with SES for various coronary artery lesions. Pts were treated with either bivalirudin only (the bivalirudin group; 0.75 mg/kg bolus and 1.75 mg/kg/h infusion, n = 323 pts) or bivalirudin (same dose) plus low-dose heparin added to the CM (the heparin mix group; mean dose = 2101.8+/-882.5 U, n = 341 pts) during PCI. The periprocedural, in-hospital, and 30-day clinical outcomes were compared.RESULTS:Baseline clinical and angiographic parameters were similar between both groups. Periprocedural, in-hospital, and 1-month clinical outcomes, including thrombotic complications, were similar between the two groups. There was no difference in the periprocedural thrombosis rate between the groups. In the heparin mix group, the overall incidence of hematoma was significantly higher (3.8% vs. 8.5%, P = .01), there was a trend toward higher rates of blood transfusion (2.6% vs. 6.6%, P = .06) and overall vascular complications (0.01% vs. 5.3%, P <.001), including pseudoaneurysm (PSA; 0.0% vs. 2.6%, P = .004), and pts who required surgical repair (0.3% vs. 1.8%, P = .07).CONCLUSIONS:The routine addition of low-dose heparin to CM during contemporary PCI does not add any protection value and is associated with higher rates of bleeding and vascular complications.

Here we review PPARγ function in relation to human adipogenesis, insulin sensitization, lipid metabolism, blood pressure regulation and prothrombotic state to perhaps provide justification for this nuclear receptor remaining a key therapeutic target for the continuing development of agents to treat human metabolic syndrome.

Cellular proliferation and migration are fundamental processes that contribute to the injury response in major blood vessels. The resultant pathologies are atherosclerosis and restenosis. As we begin to understand the cellular changes associated with vascular injury, it is critical to determine whether the inhibition of growth and movement of cells in the vasculature could serve as a novel therapeutic strategy to prevent atherosclerosis and restenosis.

Bone marrow stem cells have been shown to differentiate into various phenotypes including cardiomyocytes, vascular endothelial cells and smooth muscle. Bone marrow stem cells are mobilized and home in to areas of injured myocardium where they are involved in tissue repair. In addition, bone marrow secretes multiple growth factors, which are essential for angiogenesis and arteriogenesis. In some patients, these processes are not enough to avert clinical symptoms of ischemic disease. Therefore, in vivo administration of an adequate number of stem cells would be a significant therapeutic advance. Unfractionated bone marrow derived mononuclear stem cells, which contain both hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic cells may be more appropriate for cell therapy. Studies in animal models suggest that implantation of different types of stem cells improve angiogenesis and arteriogenesis, tissue perfusion as well as left ventricular function. Several unanswered questions remain. For example, the optimal delivery approach, dosage and timing of the administration of cell therapy as well as durability of improvements need to be studied. Early clinical studies have demonstrated safety and feasibility of various cell therapies in ischemic disease. Randomized, double blind and placebo-controlled clinical trials need to be completed to determine the effectiveness of stem cell.

BACKGROUND:Despite the fact that in animal models direct stenting (DS) reduces the vessel injury, in clinical practice this treatment strategy did not reduce late restenosis as compared to conventional strategy with balloon predilatation (PD). However, the influence of DS was not evaluated when stent expansion is optimized by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) assessment.METHODS:We analyzed the in-hospital and 1-year outcomes of patients at Washington Hospital Center who were treated with percutaneous coronary interventions and stent implantation when percutaneous intervention was guided by IVUS. Only patients treated for single de novo lesions were included.RESULTS:In 1386 patients, 251 (18.1%) were treated with DS and 1135 (71.9%) were treated with PD. Pre- and postprocedure characteristics by angiography and IVUS were similar in both groups. Postprocedure non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) occurred in 4.9% of the DS group and in 12.5% of the PD group (P = .005). At 1-year follow-up, target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate was 4.9% in the DS group and 14.8% in the PD group (P = .005). DS strategy (odds ratio = .46, confidence interval = .25-.85, P = .013) was independently correlated to lower risk for revascularization in multivariate analysis.CONCLUSION:When DS is implemented by IVUS assessment, it is associated with low in-hospital and long-term events.