Experiments designed to assess the ability to analyze Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling (VAMS®) or Tasso-M20 dried blood samples using ligand binding assays to support pharmacokinetic studies are described. An internally developed monoclonal antibody therapeutic A (mAb A) was employed as a model compound to facilitate this evaluation. The challenges of daily preparation of VAMS® calibrators in wet blood and the identification of a suitable diluent for use with dried blood samples at high analyte concentrations were addressed. A suitable surrogate matrix solution was identified for constructing calibrators, enabling accurate quantitation from dried blood samples. Additionally, utilizing surrogate matrix solutions as a diluent confirmed the absence of bias in the quantitation of diluted samples. The results of this feasibility study demonstrate the potential of using a surrogate matrix solution to address challenges associated with the analysis of dried blood samples via ligand binding methodology.

Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor is a target for both lowering low-density lipoproteins and raising high-density lipoproteins. Anacetrapib was the lead compound in our cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor program. Preclinical studies were initiated to support the safety of anacetrapib deposition in adipose tissue, followed by a clinical trial to evaluate the effects of anacetrapib in people with vascular disease. An ultra-high performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method was developed to determine tissue anacetrapib concentrations in the adipose of three animal species and humans. The assays were validated in the concentration ranges of 5-5000 ng/ml and 0.1-100 mu g/ml. The anacetrapib concentrations in adipose tissue from preclinical and clinical studies were determined.

The International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) adopted Guideline M10 entitled "Bioanalytical Method Validation and Study Sample Analysis" in May 2022. In October 2023, approximately one year after the adoption of the ICH M10 guideline, a "Hot Topic" session was held during the AAPS PharmSci 360 meeting to discuss the implementation of the guideline. The session focused on items the bioanalytical community felt were challenging to implement or ambiguous within the guideline. These topics included cross-validation, parallelism, comparative bioavailability studies, combination drug stability, endogenous analyte bioanalysis, and dilution QCs. In addition, the regulatory perspective on the guideline was presented. This report provides a summary of the Hot Topic session.

While using the cloud environment for various functions has become commonplace, relatively little attention has been given to considerations for the use of third-party cloud services for regulated bioanalytical workflow and data management. Little guidance has been provided as to how to utilize the cloud to support bioanalytical activities. It can be intimidating when considering how to go about using cloud services for data acquisition, but there are some general ideas to keep in mind when evaluating ways to accommodate regulated bioanalysis online. Determining how to incorporate the use of cloud storage with data that are generated from regulated bioanalytical analysis is an important step in maintaining the security of the data.

The 16th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (16th WRIB) took place in Atlanta, GA, USA on September 26-30, 2022. Over 1000 professionals representing pharma/biotech companies, CROs, and multiple regulatory agencies convened to actively discuss the most current topics of interest in bioanalysis. The 16th WRIB included 3 Main Workshops and 7 Specialized Workshops that together spanned 1 week in order to allow exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis, biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy, cell therapy and vaccines. Moreover, in-depth workshops on the ICH M10 BMV final guideline (focused on this guideline training, interpretation, adoption and transition); mass spectrometry innovation (focused on novel technologies, novel modalities, and novel challenges); and flow cytometry bioanalysis (rising of the 3rd most common/important technology in bioanalytical labs) were the special features of the 16th edition. As in previous years, WRIB continued to gather a wide diversity of international, industry opinion leaders and regulatory authority experts working on both small and large molecules as well as gene, cell therapies and vaccines to facilitate sharing and discussions focused on improving quality, increasing regulatory compliance, and achieving scientific excellence on bioanalytical issues. This 2022 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2022 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication (Part 1A) covers the recommendations on Mass Spectrometry and ICH M10. Part 1B covers the Regulatory Agencies' Inputs on Bioanalysis, Biomarkers, Immunogenicity, Gene & Cell Therapy and Vaccine. Part 2 (LBA, Biomarkers/CDx and Cytometry) and Part 3 (Gene Therapy, Cell therapy, Vaccines and Biotherapeutics Immunogenicity) are published in volume 15 of Bioanalysis, issues 15 and 14 (2023), respectively.

In-clinic venous dried blood spot (DBS) pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was incorporated into two phase 3 studies of verubecestat for Alzheimer’s disease (EPOCH [NCT01739348] and APECS [NCT01953601]), as a potential alternative to plasma PK sampling. Initially, plasma and DBS PK samples were collected concurrently to better understand the DBS–plasma verubecestat concentration relationship, with the intention of discontinuing DBS or plasma sampling following interim analysis. Following initial analyses and comparison of results with prespecified selection criteria, plasma PK sampling was discontinued; however, a stability issue resulting in generally lower DBS verubecestat concentrations with longer collection-to-assay times was subsequently discovered (associated with non-compliance in DBS sample handling), prompting reintroduction of plasma sampling. To enable inclusion of DBS data in population PK analyses, a conversion algorithm for calculating plasma-equivalent concentrations (accounting for DBS sample instability) was developed using paired (time-matched) plasma and DBS data from the EPOCH study. Verubecestat population PK models developed from pooled phase 1/1b and EPOCH data using either (1) plasma-only data or (2) plasma and plasma-equivalent concentrations (calculated from non-paired DBS samples) yielded similar results. The algorithm robustness was demonstrated using DBS data from paired samples from the APECS study and comparison between plasma and plasma-equivalent concentrations. The population PK model was updated with APECS data (both plasma and, if no plasma sample available, plasma equivalents). The results demonstrated similar PK in the two phase 3 populations and exposures consistent with expectations from phase 1 data. This case study illustrates challenges with employing new sampling techniques in large, global trials and describes lessons learned.

For pharmacokinetics characterization of a therapeutic insulin dimer, an ultrasensitive plasma method was required due to the expected low circulating levels in humans. A bioanalytical strategy combining immunoprecipitation enrichment with liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis of the intact protein offers the opportunity to resolve the analyte from endogenous and exogenous insulin and insulin analogs. Nonetheless, interference from complex background matrix was observed limiting reliable measurements at the low concentration range. A sample preparation approach incorporating protein precipitation and immunoprecipitation was developed and optimized to further reduce sample complexity prior to LC-MS/MS analysis. This approach enabled a deeper level of selectivity and presented a cleaner mass spectrometric detection that may otherwise be confounded. Sample preparation was automated to allow high throughput analysis. The method reached a limit of quantitation at 0.3 ng/mL (25 pM), and a linear dynamic range from 0.3 to 300 ng/mL. Results were highly reproducible, with intra-day and inter-day precision and bias below 11%. Furthermore, the organic solvent treatment involved in protein precipitation is expected to improve assay resistance to the bias introduced by endogenous protein binding such as that exerted by anti-drug antibodies. The method was successfully applied to support clinical pharmacokinetics studies. This approach may potentially be adapted to bioanalysis of low abundance proteins.

In-clinic dried blood spot (DBS) pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was incorporated into two phase 3 studies of verubecestat for Alzheimer’s disease (EPOCH [NCT01739348] and APECS [NCT01953601]), as a potential alternative to plasma PK sampling for improved logistical feasibility and decreased blood volume burden. However, an interim PK analysis revealed verubecestat concentrations in DBS samples declined with time to assay in both trials. An investigation revealed wide variation in implementation practices for DBS sample handling procedures resulting in insufficient desiccation which caused verubecestat instability. High-resolution mass spectrometry evaluations of stressed and aged verubecestat DBS samples revealed the presence of two hydrolysis degradants. To minimize instability, new DBS handling procedures were implemented that provided additional desiccant and minimized the time to analysis. Both verubecestat hydrolysis products were previously discovered and synthesized during active pharmaceutical ingredient stability characterization. A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay to quantitate the dominant verubecestat degradant in DBS samples was developed and validated. The application of this method to stressed and aged verubecestat DBS samples confirmed that degradant concentrations accounted for the observed decreases in the verubecestat concentration. Furthermore, after increasing desiccant amounts, degradant concentrations accounted for approximately 7% of the verubecestat concentration in DBS clinical samples, indicating that issues with sample handling were minimized with new storage and shipping conditions. This case study illustrates the challenges with employing new sampling techniques in large, global trials, and the importance of anticipating and mitigating implementation risks.

The 15th edition of the Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (15th WRIB) was held on 27 September to 1 October 2021. Even with a last-minute move from in-person to virtual, an overwhelmingly high number of nearly 900 professionals representing pharma and biotech companies, contract research organizations (CROs), and multiple regulatory agencies still eagerly convened to actively discuss the most current topics of interest in bioanalysis. The 15th WRIB included 3 Main Workshops and 7 Specialized Workshops that together spanned 1 week in order to allow exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis, biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy, cell therapy and vaccines. Moreover, in-depth workshops on biomarker assay development and validation (BAV) (focused on clarifying the confusion created by the increased use of the term "Context of Use - COU"); mass spectrometry of proteins (therapeutic, biomarker and transgene); state-of-the-art cytometry innovation and validation; and, critical reagent and positive control generation were the special features of the 15th edition. This 2021 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop, and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2021 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication (Part 1A) covers the recommendations on Endogenous Compounds, Small Molecules, Complex Methods, Regulated Mass Spec of Large Molecules, Small Molecule, PoC. Part 1B covers the Regulatory Agencies' Inputs on Bioanalysis, Biomarkers, Immunogenicity, Gene & Cell Therapy and Vaccine. Part 2 (ISR for Biomarkers, Liquid Biopsies, Spectral Cytometry, Inhalation/Oral & Multispecific Biotherapeutics, Accuracy/LLOQ for Flow Cytometry) and Part 3 (TAb/NAb, Viral Vector CDx, Shedding Assays; CRISPR/Cas9 & CAR-T Immunogenicity; PCR & Vaccine Assay Performance; ADA Assay Comparabil ity & Cut Point Appropriateness) are published in volume 14 of Bioanalysis, issues 10 and 11 (2022), respectively.

Challenges for data storage during drug development have become increasingly complex as the pharmaceutical industry expands in an environment that requires on-demand availability of data and resources for users across the globe. While the efficiency and relative low cost of cloud services have become increasingly attractive, hesitancy toward the use of cloud services has decreased and there has been a significant shift toward real-world implementation. Within GxP laboratories, the considerations for cloud storage of data include data integrity and security, as well as access control and usage for users around the globe. In this review, challenges and considerations when using cloud storage options for the storage of laboratory-based GxP data are discussed and best practices are defined.

The 14 th edition of the Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (14 th WRIB) was held virtually on June 15–29, 2020 with an attendance of over 1000 representatives from pharmaceutical/biopharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, contract research organizations, and regulatory agencies worldwide. The 14 th WRIB included three Main Workshops, seven Specialized Workshops that together spanned 11 days in order to allow exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis, biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy, cell therapy and vaccine. Moreover, a comprehensive vaccine assays track; an enhanced cytometry track and updated Industry/Regulators consensus on BMV of biotherapeutics by Mass Spectrometry (hybrid assays, LCMS and HRMS) were special features in 2020. As in previous years, this year's WRIB continued to gather a wide diversity of international industry opinion leaders and regulatory authority experts working on both small and large molecules to facilitate sharing and discussions focused on improving quality, increasing regulatory compliance and achieving scientific excellence on bioanalytical issues. This 2020 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop and is aimed to provide the Global Bioanalytical Community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2020 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication covers the recommendations on (Part 1) Hybrid Assays, Innovation in Small Molecules, & Regulated Bioanalysis. Part 2A (BAV, PK LBA, Flow Cytometry Validation and Cytometry Innovation), Part 2B (Regulatory Input) and Part 3 (Vaccine, Gene/Cell Therapy, NAb Harmonization and Immunogenicity) are published in volume 13 of Bioanalysis, issues 5, and 6 (2021), respectively.

The use of quality control (QC) samples in bioanalysis is well established and consistent with regulatory guidance. However, a systematic evaluation of whether QC samples serve the intended purpose of improving data quality has not been undertaken. The Translational and ADME Sciences Leadership Group (TALG) of the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ) conducted an evaluation to assess whether closer agreement is observed when comparing pharmacokinetic data from two passed runs, than when comparing data from failed and passed (retest) runs. Analysis of data collected across organizations, molecular types and analytical platforms, revealed that bioanalytical methods are very reproducible; and that QC samples improve the overall quality of pharmacokinetic concentration data and justifies their continued use.

Microsampling techniques have been employed as an alternative to traditional serum/plasma sampling because of their inherently proven and desirable advantages across the pharmaceutical industry. These include reduced animal usage in pre-clinical studies, as well as, permitting the collection of samples that would otherwise be inaccessible in clinical studies. The application of volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS®) technology, a second-generation dried microsampling method, coupled with LC–MS, has been extensively explored for small molecule drugs at various drug development stages. However, the potential of using VAMS technology and LC–MS analysis for biological therapeutic development has yet to be well-established. In this work, we describe the method development, validation, and a proof-of-concept non-human primate study of a LC–MS/MS method for VAMS utilized to obtain pharmacokinetic (PK) data for a therapeutic monoclonal antibody. A good correlation between VAMS data and data from conventional serum samples was established in rhesus monkeys and indicated the possibility of using of this novel sampling technology in clinical studies. However, during the initial clinical study, a significant difference in internal standard (IS) response between the patient fingerstick samples and the standard/QC samples was observed, which posed a question on the accuracy of the clinical results. A comprehensive investigation confirmed that the EDTA anticoagulant used in the standard/QC samples was the root cause of the observed anomalous IS responses. Special considerations and corresponding best practices during method development and validation are proposed to ensure early detection of potential issues and appropriate implementation of VAMS technology in clinical studies in the future.

In this paper we show the application of the Tasso OnDemand (TM), a novel automated sample collection device, in conjunction with volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) for the development of gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist currently under clinical development for the treatment of refractory and unexplained chronic cough and endometriosis-related pain. A LC-MS/MS bioanalytical method was developed and validated using VAMS to support this development program. This method was utilized in a drug-drug interaction study to establish a mathematical bridging relationship with data obtained from a validated plasma assay used to support the program. The VAMS bioanalytical method and the predictability of the mathematical relationship is reported and discussed here.

The robustness of good laboratory practice and clinical data is reliant upon a clear understanding of the bioanalytical assays. One of the most important components of ligand-binding based assays is critical reagents used to directly or indirectly measure biologic markers or signals. High quality, reproducible, sustainable critical reagents through the development lifecycle could avoid unnecessary rework, multiple validations, cross-validations, and ensure consistency of the data. Numerous analytical methods (UPLC-size exclusion chromatography, cation exchange chromatography, biacore/octet, and high-resolution mass spectrometry) have been evaluated by using current critical reagents. A comprehensive analytical toolbox of biochemical and biophysical methods has been employed to evaluate the quality of critical reagents and explore potential issues if there are any. Moving forward, this "tiered approach" of critical reagents characterization will be used not only to establish critical quality attributes for new reagents but also to evaluate stability in support of reagents recertification.

Internal standard (IS) response has been an active topic of discussion within the bioanalytical community. Initial discussions focused on developing criteria for anomalous responses. Recently, understanding the cause and potential impact of variable IS response has been emphasized. Following a review of recommendations from industry discussions regarding variable IS responses, case studies where interferences with IS response resulted in quantitation inaccuracy are presented. The examples illustrate that variable IS response cannot always be attributed to compensation of matrix effects. Anomalous IS responses, even for stable label internal standards should be investigated and the root cause for the anomalous behavior should, if possible, be determined.

Aim: A method to quantitate doravirine (MK-1439) in human plasma has been developed to support human clinical trials designed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of the compound. Methodology & results: The analyte was extracted using liquid-liquid extraction, separated on a reverse phase HPLC column, and detected on an API-4000 mass spectrometer using a Turbo-Ion spray source in positive ionization mode coupled with multiple reaction monitoring mode was used for quantification. The dynamic range for the assay was 0.02-10 ng/ml using 100 μl of human plasma. Conclusion: The assay was found to be sensitive, selective and reproducible and applied to support the doravirine clinical development program.

Biography Dr Woolf is currently Executive Director of the regulated PK Bioanalysis Group of Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, PA, USA. He received his BA in Chemistry from LaSalle College in 1982, and a PhD in Analytical Chemistry from Seton Hall University in 1986. From 1986 to 1990, he was a member of the Drug Metabolism/Pharmacokinetics Department of Berlex Laboratories. He joined Merck Research Laboratories in 1990 as a research fellow. Dr Woolf and his group have supported numerous clinical development projects that have led to the successful registration of Merck compounds. Since 1986, he has authored or coauthored over 50 research papers pertaining to bioanalysis and pharmacokinetics. This interview was conducted by Sankeetha Nadarajah, Managing Commissioning Editor of Bioanalysis, at the AAPS ICH-M10 Public Consultation Workshop (Silver Spring, MD, USA), 11 June 2019.

Aim: MK-8591 (EFdA), a novel anti-HIV nucleoside analog, is converted to mono-, di- and tri-phosphates (MK-8591-MP, MK-8591-DP and MK-8591-TP) intracellularly, among which MK-8591-TP is the active pharmacological form. An ultrasensitive LC-MS/MS assay was required to measure MK-8591-DP and MK-8591-TP levels in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Sensitivity and reproducibility were major bottlenecks in these analyses. Materials and methods: Human PBMCs were isolated from blood and lysed with 70/30 methanol/RPMI-1640. An LC-MS/MS method was developed to simultaneously quantify MK-8591-DP and MK-8581-TP in PBMC lysates.Results: Low flow LC and dimethyl sulfoxide mediated signal enhancement enabled an extreme sensitivity with limit of quantitation at 0.1ng/ml. Assay accuracy was 92.5-106% and precision was 0.7-12.1% for a linear curve range of 0.1-40ng/ml. Matrix variability and interference liability were comprehensively evaluated. Conclusion: Our study findings and steps taken in addressing clinical sample issues help understand and overcome the challenges facing intracellular nucleotide analog analysis.

Over the last decade, several regulatory guidelines on bioanalytical method validation (BMV) have been issued by regulatory agencies around the world. This has left the bioanalytical community struggling with regional differences in regulatory expectations when preparing for global pharmaceutical submissions. The International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) has the mission to achieve greater harmonization worldwide to ensure that safe, effective, and high-quality medicines are developed and registered in the most resource-efficient manner. Following calls for harmonization, ICH-selected bioanalytical method validation and sample analysis among its topics for guidance development and earlier this year released a draft guideline (M10) on BMV for public consultation. In response, the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) held a 3-day workshop to provide a forum for regulatory, industry, and academic scientists to discuss the guideline and hear various points of view on key aspects. While there was agreement that the draft guideline is generally well written and comprehensive, specific topics generated considerable discussion and, in some cases, revision recommendations for consideration by the expert working group (EWG) responsible for the guideline content. This report provides a summary of the workshop proceedings.