Fragile X Syndrome (FXS) is the leading monogenic cause of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). To date, no approved pharmacological treatment alleviates social impairments in patients with FXS. Since D1 and D2 dopamine receptor-expressing striatal projection neurons (SPNs) were shown to regulate ASD-sensitive behaviors, we explored whether the balance of activity between D1- and D2-SPNs would be biased in the Fmr1-/- mouse model of FXS. We evaluated striatal function in Fmr1 -/- and Fmr1 +/+ mice under pharmacological challenge and performed RNAscope® in situ hybridization following social interaction to assess the activity of SPNs in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and dorsal striatum (DS). We evidenced a decrease in D1-SPN activity, biasing the D1/D2-SPN balance towards an excessive weight of D2-SPN outputs. We then evaluated the effects of compounds that repress D2-SPN activity on behavioral impairments in Fmr1 -/- mice. Systemically facilitating mGlu4 or blocking A2A receptor activity relieved behavioral deficits in this model. Finally, we tested the hypothesis that a tilt of the D1/D2-SPN balance in Fmr1 -/- mice may contribute to their social deficit by facilitating mGlu4 activity directly in the projection site of NAc D2-SPNs. Social interaction in Fmr1 -/- mice was fully rescued by photopharmacological activation of mGlu4 in the ventral pallidum (VP), where NAc D2-SPNs project. This result supports our hypothesis of excessive D2-SPN outputs and highlights the contribution of the VP in controlling social behavior. In conclusion, pharmacological compounds that repress D2-SPN activity demonstrate a promising therapeutic potential to relieve ASD-like deficits in FXS. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. ANR, ANR-17-NEU3-0001 British Society for Neuroendocrinology, https://ror.org/0428xjm46 ERA-NET Neuron

The ancestral and ubiquitous KEAP1-NRF2 cellular defense system is controlled by chemical inducers and intracellular proteins. Here, we show that an extracellular protein, BDNF, can directly control this cytoprotective system via a receptor-independent pathway. Thanks to a highly conserved C-terminal CPP sequence, BDNF freely crosses the cell membrane, binds to KEAP1, and thereby promotes the nuclear translocation of NRF2 to exert an effective cytoprotective effect. The high conservation of the CPP sequence over 450 million years demonstrates the essential role of this signaling pathway. The receptor-independent cytoprotective effect, in addition to the canonical receptor-dependent neurotrophic effect, shows that a protein can exert distinct effects via receptor-dependent and receptor-independent mechanisms, as described for small molecules. As extracellular BDNF is present throughout the body, it can control the cellular defenses of cells, including those without receptors. Consequently, any change in BDNF extracellular levels is likely to modify the cytoprotective response and thus contribute to numerous pathologies.

Metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors (nomenclature as agreed by the NC-IUPHAR Subcommittee on Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors [354]) are a family of G protein-coupled receptors activated by the neurotransmitter glutamate [141]. The mGlu family is composed of eight members (named mGlu1 to mGlu8) which are divided in three groups based on similarities of agonist pharmacology, primary sequence and G protein coupling to effector: Group-I (mGlu1 and mGlu5), Group-II (mGlu2 and mGlu3) and Group-III (mGlu4, mGlu6, mGlu7 and mGlu8) (see Further reading).Structurally, mGlu are composed of three juxtaposed domains: a core G protein-activating seven-transmembrane domain (TM), common to all GPCRs, is linked via a rigid cysteine-rich domain (CRD) to the Venus Flytrap domain (VFTD), a large bi-lobed extracellular domain where glutamate binds. mGlu form constitutive dimers, cross-linked by a disulfide bridge. The structures of the VFTD of mGlu1, mGlu2, mGlu3, mGlu5 and mGlu7 have been solved [203, 278, 271, 406]. The structure of the 7 transmembrane (TM) domains of both mGlu1 and mGlu5 have been solved, and confirm a general helical organisation similar to other GPCRs, although the helices appear more compacted [89, 436, 63]. Recent advances in cryo-electron microscopy have provided structures of full-length mGlu receptor homodimers [220, 193], heterodimers [92, 163], and new insights into activation mechanisms [47, 48, 201]. Studies have revealed the possible formation of heterodimers between either group-I receptors, or within and between group-II and -III receptors [90]. First characterised in transfected cells, co-localisation and specific pharmacological properties suggest the existence of such heterodimers in the brain [273, 443, 146, 286, 262, 221]. Beyond heteromerisation with other mGlu receptor subtypes, increasing evidence suggests mGlu receptors form heteromers and larger order complexes with class A GPCRs (reviewed in [141]). The endogenous ligands of mGlu are L-glutamic acid, L-serine-O-phosphate, N-acetylaspartylglutamate (NAAG) and L-cysteine sulphinic acid. Group-I mGlu receptors may be activated by 3,5-DHPG and (S)-3HPG [29] and antagonised by (S)-hexylhomoibotenic acid [238]. Group-II mGlu receptors may be activated by LY389795 [272], LY379268 [272], eglumegad (also refered to as LY354470) [358, 437], DCG-IV and (2R,3R)-APDC [359], and antagonised by eGlu [172] and LY307452 [428, 106]. Group-III mGlu receptors may be activated by L-AP4 and (R,S)-4-PPG [131]. An example of an antagonist selective for mGlu receptors is LY341495, which blocks mGlu2 and mGlu3 at low nanomolar concentrations, mGlu8 at high nanomolar concentrations, and mGlu4, mGlu5, and mGlu7 in the micromolar range [187]. In addition to orthosteric ligands that directly interact with the glutamate recognition site, allosteric modulators that recognise distinct sites primarily within the TM domain have been described. Negative allosteric modulators are listed separately. Positive allosteric modulators potentiate orthosteric agonist responses solely, or may also possess intrinsic agonist activity.

The world has witnessed a revolution in therapeutics with the development of biological medicines such as antibodies and antibody fragments, notably nanobodies. These nanobodies possess unique characteristics including high specificity and modulatory activity, making them promising candidates for therapeutic applications. Identifying their binding mode is essential for their development. Experimental structural techniques are effective to get such information, but they are expensive and time-consuming. Here, we propose a computational approach, aiming to identify the epitope of a nanobody that acts as an agonist and a positive allosteric modulator at the rat metabotropic glutamate receptor 5. We employed multiple structure modeling tools, including various artificial intelligence algorithms for epitope mapping. The computationally identified epitope was experimentally validated, confirming the success of our approach. Additional dynamics studies provided further insights on the modulatory activity of the nanobody. The employed methodologies and approaches initiate a discussion on the efficacy of diverse techniques for epitope mapping and later nanobody engineering.

Metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors play a key role in modulating most synapses in the brain. The mGlu7 receptors inhibit presynaptic neurotransmitter release and offer therapeutic possibilities for post-traumatic stress disorders or epilepsy. Screening campaigns provided mGlu7-specific allosteric modulators as the inhibitor XAP044 (Gee et al. J. Biol. Chem. 2014). In contrast to other mGlu receptor allosteric modulators, XAP044 does not bind in the transmembrane domain but to the extracellular domain of the mGlu7 receptor and not at the orthosteric site. Here, we identified the mode of action of XAP044, combining synthesis of derivatives, modeling and docking experiments, and mutagenesis. We propose a unique mode of action of these inhibitors, preventing the closure of the Venus flytrap agonist binding domain. While acting as a noncompetitive antagonist of L-AP4, XAP044 and derivatives act as apparent competitive antagonists of LSP4-2022. These data revealed more potent XAP044 analogues and new possibilities to target mGluRs.

Metabotropic glutamate (Glu) receptors (mGlu receptors) play a key role in modulating excitatory neurotransmission in the central nervous system (CNS). In this study, we report the structure-based design and pharmacological evaluation of densely functionalized, conformationally restricted glutamate analogue (1S,2S,3S)-2-((S)-amino(carboxy)methyl)-3-(carboxymethyl)cyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (LBG30300). LBG30300 was synthesized in a stereocontrolled fashion in nine steps from a commercially available optically active epoxide. Functional characterization of all eight mGlu receptor subtypes showed that LBG30300 is a picomolar agonist at mGlu2 with excellent selectivity over mGlu3 and the other six mGlu receptor subtypes. Bioavailability studies on mice (IV administration) confirm CNS exposure, and an in silico study predicts a binding mode of LBG30300 which induces a flipping of Tyr144 to allow for a salt bridge interaction of the acetate group with Arg271. The Tyr144 residue now prevents Arg271 from interacting with Asp146, which is a residue of differentiation between mGlu2 and mGlu3 and thus could explain the observed subtype selectivity.

Figures S1-S16 Tables S1 to S2

Metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors (nomenclature as agreed by the NC-IUPHAR Subcommittee on Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors [351]) are a family of G protein-coupled receptors activated by the neurotransmitter glutamate [140]. The mGlu family is composed of eight members (named mGlu1 to mGlu8) which are divided in three groups based on similarities of agonist pharmacology, primary sequence and G protein coupling to effector: Group-I (mGlu1 and mGlu5), Group-II (mGlu2 and mGlu3) and Group-III (mGlu4, mGlu6, mGlu7 and mGlu8) (see Further reading).Structurally, mGlu are composed of three juxtaposed domains: a core G protein-activating seven-transmembrane domain (TM), common to all GPCRs, is linked via a rigid cysteine-rich domain (CRD) to the Venus Flytrap domain (VFTD), a large bi-lobed extracellular domain where glutamate binds. mGlu form constitutive dimers, cross-linked by a disulfide bridge. The structures of the VFTD of mGlu1, mGlu2, mGlu3, mGlu5 and mGlu7 have been solved [200, 275, 268, 403]. The structure of the 7 transmembrane (TM) domains of both mGlu1 and mGlu5 have been solved, and confirm a general helical organisation similar to that of other GPCRs, although the helices appear more compacted [88, 433, 62]. Recent advances in cryo-electron microscopy have provided structures of full-length mGlu receptor homodimers [217, 191] and heterodimers [91]. Studies have revealed the possible formation of heterodimers between either group-I receptors, or within and between group-II and -III receptors [89]. First characterised in transfected cells, co-localisation and specific pharmacological properties suggest the existence of such heterodimers in the brain [270, 440, 145, 283, 259, 218]. Beyond heteromerisation with other mGlu receptor subtypes, increasing evidence suggests mGlu receptors form heteromers and larger order complexes with class A GPCRs (reviewed in [140]). The endogenous ligands of mGlu are L-glutamic acid, L-serine-O-phosphate, N-acetylaspartylglutamate (NAAG) and L-cysteine sulphinic acid. Group-I mGlu receptors may be activated by 3,5-DHPG and (S)-3HPG [30] and antagonised by (S)-hexylhomoibotenic acid [235]. Group-II mGlu receptors may be activated by LY389795 [269], LY379268 [269], eglumegad [354, 434], DCG-IV and (2R,3R)-APDC [355], and antagonised by eGlu [170] and LY307452 [425, 105]. Group-III mGlu receptors may be activated by L-AP4 and (R,S)-4-PPG [130]. An example of an antagonist selective for mGlu receptors is LY341495, which blocks mGlu2 and mGlu3 at low nanomolar concentrations, mGlu8 at high nanomolar concentrations, and mGlu4, mGlu5, and mGlu7 in the micromolar range [185]. In addition to orthosteric ligands that directly interact with the glutamate recognition site, allosteric modulators that bind within the TM domain have been described. Negative allosteric modulators are listed separately. The positive allosteric modulators most often act as ‘potentiators’ of an orthosteric agonist response, without significantly activating the receptor in the absence of agonist.

Background Evidence has accumulated demonstrating the existence of opioid receptor heteromers, and recent data suggest that targeting these heteromers could reduce opioid side effects while retaining therapeutic effects. Indeed, CYM51010 characterized as a MOR (mu opioid receptor)/DOR (delta opioid receptor) heteromer-preferring agonist promoted antinociception comparable with morphine but with less tolerance. In the perspective of developing these new classes of pharmacological agents, data on their putative side effects are mandatory. Methods Therefore, in this study, we investigated the effects of CYM51010 in different models related to drug addiction in mice, including behavioral sensitization, conditioned place preference and withdrawal. Results We found that, like morphine, CYM51010 promoted acute locomotor activity as well as psychomotor sensitization and rewarding effect. However, it induced less physical dependence than morphine. We also investigated the ability of CYM51010 to modulate some morphine-induced behavior. Whereas CYM51010 was unable to block morphine-induced physical dependence, it blocked reinstatement of an extinguished morphine induced-conditioned place preference. Conclusions Altogether, our results reveal that targeting MOR-DOR heteromers could represent a promising strategy to block morphine reward.

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) have been discovered almost four decades ago. Since then, their pharmacology has been largely developed as well as their structural organization. Indeed mGluRs are attractive therapeutic targets for numerous psychiatric and neurological disorders because of their modulating role of synaptic transmission. The more recent drug discovery programs have mostly concentrated on allosteric modulators. However, orthosteric agonists and antagonists have remained unavoidable pharmacological tools as, although not expected, many of them can reach the brain, or can be modified to reach the brain. This review focuses on the most common orthosteric ligands as well as on the few allosteric modulators interacting with the glutamate binding domain. The 3D-structures of these ligands at their binding sites are reported. For most of them, X-Ray structures or docked homology models are available. Because of the high conservation of the binding site, subtype selective agonists were not easy to find. Yet, some were discovered when extending their chemical structures in order to reach selective sites of the receptors. This article is part of the Neuropharmacology Special Issue on ‘Glutamate Receptors – mGluRs’.

In addition to its well-known receptor-mediated function in cell survival, differentiation and growth, we report that the extracellular brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) also controls the intracellular KEAP1-NRF2 cytoprotective system by a receptor-independent pathway. Extracellular BDNF can cross the cell membrane as it possesses a protein-translocation domain, also known as cell-penetrating peptide. This membrane crossing process is energy-independent, ruling out endocytosis and receptor-dependent mechanisms. Once in the cytosol, BDNF binds to KEAP1 with a nanomolar affinity, enabling nuclear translocation of NRF2 and transcription of NRF2-target genes. BDNF is thus a major regulator of NRF2 activation. A dysfunction of this BDNF-KEAP1-NRF2 pathway may be involved in most diseases where antioxidant and cytoprotective functions are altered. This novel form of communication, whereby a receptor ligand protein exerts a biological activity by crossing the cell membrane, opens new avenues for cell signaling.

There is growing interest in developing biologics due to their high target selectivity. The G protein-coupled homo- and heterodimeric metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors regulate many synapses and are promising targets for the treatment of numerous brain diseases. Although subtype-selective allosteric small molecules have been reported, their effects on the recently discovered heterodimeric receptors are often not known. Here, we describe a nanobody that specifically and fully activates homodimeric human mGlu4 receptors. Molecular modeling and mutagenesis studies revealed that the nanobody acts by stabilizing the closed active state of the glutamate binding domain by interacting with both lobes. In contrast, this nanobody does not activate the heterodimeric mGlu2-4 but acts as a pure positive allosteric modulator. These data further reveal how an antibody can fully activate a class C receptor and bring further evidence that nanobodies represent an alternative way to specifically control mGlu receptor subtypes.

Metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors (nomenclature as agreed by the NC-IUPHAR Subcommittee on Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors [347]) are a family of G protein-coupled receptors activated by the neurotransmitter glutamate [138]. The mGlu family is composed of eight members (named mGlu1 to mGlu8) which are divided in three groups based on similarities of agonist pharmacology, primary sequence and G protein coupling to effector: Group-I (mGlu1 and mGlu5), Group-II (mGlu2 and mGlu3) and Group-III (mGlu4, mGlu6, mGlu7 and mGlu8) (see Further reading).Structurally, mGlu are composed of three juxtaposed domains: a core G protein-activating seven-transmembrane domain (TM), common to all GPCRs, is linked via a rigid cysteine-rich domain (CRD) to the Venus Flytrap domain (VFTD), a large bi-lobed extracellular domain where glutamate binds. mGlu form constitutive dimers, cross-linked by a disulfide bridge. The structures of the VFTD of mGlu1, mGlu2, mGlu3, mGlu5 and mGlu7 have been solved [198, 271, 264, 399]. The structure of the 7 transmembrane (TM) domains of both mGlu1 and mGlu5 have been solved, and confirm a general helical organization similar to that of other GPCRs, although the helices appear more compacted [87, 429, 61]. Recent advances in cryo-electron microscopy have provided structures of full-length mGlu receptor dimers [189]. Studies have revealed the possible formation of heterodimers between either group-I receptors, or within and between group-II and -III receptors [88]. First well characterized in transfected cells, co-localization and specific pharmacological properties also suggest the existence of such heterodimers in the brain [266].[436, 143, 279]. Beyond heteromerization with other mGlu receptor subtypes, increasing evidence suggests mGlu receptors form heteromers and larger order complexes with class A GPCRs (reviewed in [138]). The endogenous ligands of mGlu are L-glutamic acid, L-serine-O-phosphate, N-acetylaspartylglutamate (NAAG) and L-cysteine sulphinic acid. Group-I mGlu receptors may be activated by 3,5-DHPG and (S)-3HPG [30] and antagonized by (S)-hexylhomoibotenic acid [232]. Group-II mGlu receptors may be activated by LY389795 [265], LY379268 [265], eglumegad [350, 430], DCG-IV and (2R,3R)-APDC [351], and antagonised by eGlu [168] and LY307452 [421, 103]. Group-III mGlu receptors may be activated by L-AP4 and (R,S)-4-PPG [128]. An example of an antagonist selective for mGlu receptors is LY341495, which blocks mGlu2 and mGlu3 at low nanomolar concentrations, mGlu8 at high nanomolar concentrations, and mGlu4, mGlu5, and mGlu7 in the micromolar range [183]. In addition to orthosteric ligands that directly interact with the glutamate recognition site, allosteric modulators that bind within the TM domain have been described. Negative allosteric modulators are listed separately. The positive allosteric modulators most often act as ‘potentiators’ of an orthosteric agonist response, without significantly activating the receptor in the absence of agonist.

Cocaine addiction is a serious health issue in Western countries. Despite the regular increase in cocaine consumption across the population, there is no specific treatment for cocaine addiction. Critical roles for glutamate neurotransmission in the rewarding effects of psychostimulants as well as relapse have been suggested and accumulating evidence indicates that targeting mGlu group III receptors could represent a promising strategy to develop therapeutic compounds to treat addiction. In this context, the aim of our study was to examine the effect of LSP2-9166, a mGlu4/mGlu7 receptor orthosteric agonist, on the motivation for cocaine intake. We used an intravenous self-administration paradigm in male Wistar rats as a reliable model of voluntary drug intake. We first evaluated the direct impact of cocaine on Grm4 and Grm7 gene expression. Voluntary cocaine intake under a fixed ratio schedule of injections induced an increase of both mGlu4 and mGlu7 receptor transcripts in nucleus accumbens and hippocampus. We then evaluated the ability of LSP2-9166 to affect cocaine self-administration under a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement. We found that this compound inhibits the motivation to obtain the drug, although it induced a hypolocomotor effect which could biais motivation index. Our findings demonstrate that mGlu group III receptors represent new targets for decreasing motivation to self-administer cocaine.

Significance G protein-coupled receptors regulate several physiological processes, many of which sense nutrients. The mode of action of these nutrients remains elusive, as it is difficult to control nutrient concentrations around living cells. The calcium-sensing receptor is regulated by multiple factors, including ions and amino acids, to control calcium homeostasis; and genetic mutations are responsible for human diseases. Here, we investigated this receptor in a perfect control of ambient nutrients. Based on the identification of calcium ion activation sites, we propose a molecular basis for how calcium and amino acids cooperate to control receptor activation. This leads to a model for the mechanism of activation of this receptor and its modulation by multiple ligands and genetic mutations.

Sialin, encoded by the SLC17A5 gene, is a lysosomal sialic acid transporter defective in Salla disease, a rare inherited leukodystrophy. It also enables metabolic incorporation of exogenous sialic acids, leading to autoantibodies against N-glycolylneuraminic acid in humans. Here, we identified a novel class of human sialin ligands by virtual screening and structure-activity relationship studies. The ligand scaffold is characterized by an amino acid backbone with a free carboxylate, an N-linked aromatic or heteroaromatic substituent, and a hydrophobic side chain. The most potent compound, 45 (LSP12-3129), inhibited N-acetylneuraminic acid 1 (Neu5Ac) transport in a non-competitive manner with IC50 ≈ 2.5 μM, a value 400-fold lower than the KM for Neu5Ac. In vitro and molecular docking studies attributed the non-competitive character to selective inhibitor binding to the Neu5Ac site in a cytosol-facing conformation. Moreover, compound 45 rescued the trafficking defect of the pathogenic mutant (R39C) causing Salla disease. This new class of cell-permeant inhibitors provides tools to investigate the physiological roles of sialin and help develop pharmacological chaperones for Salla disease.

The alanine-serine-cysteine transporter Asc-1 regulates the synaptic availability of d -serine and glycine (the two co-agonists of the NMDA receptor) and is regarded as an important drug target. To shuttle the substrate from the extracellular space to the cytoplasm, this transporter undergoes multiple distinct conformational states. In this work, homology modeling, substrate docking and molecular dynamics simulations were carried out to learn more about the transition between the “outward-open” and “outward-open occluded” states. We identified a transition state involving the highly-conserved unwound TM6 region in which the Phe243 flips close to the d -serine substrate without major movements of TM6. This feature and those of other key residues are proposed to control the binding site and substrate translocation. Competitive inhibitors ACPP, LuAE00527 and SMLC were docked and their binding modes at the substrate binding site corroborated the key role played by Phe243 of TM6. For ACPP and LuAE00527, strong hydrophobic interactions with this residue hinder its mobility and prevent the uptake and the efflux of substrates. As for SMLC, the weaker interactions maintain the flexibility of Phe243 and the efflux process. Overall, we propose a molecular basis for the inhibition of substrate translocation of the Asc-1 transporter that should be valuable for rational drug design.

Finding new targets to control or reduce seizure activity is essential to improve the management of epileptic patients. We hypothesized that activation of the pre-synaptic and inhibitory metabotropic glutamate receptor type 7 (mGlu7) reduces spontaneous seizures. We tested LSP2-9166, a recently developed mGlu7/4 agonist with unprecedented potency on mGlu7 receptors, in two paradigms of epileptogenesis. In a model of chemically induced epileptogenesis (pentylenetetrazole systemic injection), LSP2-9166 induces an anti-epileptogenic effect rarely observed in preclinical studies. In particular, we found a bidirectional modulation of seizure progression by mGlu4 and mGlu7 receptors, the latter preventing kindling. In the intra-hippocampal injection of kainic acid mouse model that mimics the human mesial temporal lobe epilepsy, we found that LSP2-9166 reduces seizure frequency and hippocampal sclerosis. LSP2-9166 also acts as an anti-seizure drug on established seizures in both models tested. Specific modulation of the mGlu7 receptor could represent a novel approach to reduce pathological network remodeling.

AbstractThe glutamate metabotropic receptor 4 (GRM4) locus is linked to susceptibility to human osteosarcoma, through unknown mechanisms. We show that Grm4−/− gene–targeted mice demonstrate accelerated radiation-induced tumor development to an extent comparable with Rb1+/− mice. GRM4 is expressed in myeloid cells, selectively regulating expression of IL23 and the related cytokine IL12. Osteosarcoma-conditioned media induce myeloid cell Il23 expression in a GRM4-dependent fashion, while suppressing the related cytokine Il12. Both human and mouse osteosarcomas express an increased IL23:IL12 ratio, whereas higher IL23 expression is associated with worse survival in humans. Consistent with an oncogenic role, Il23−/− mice are strikingly resistant to osteosarcoma development. Agonists of GRM4 or a neutralizing antibody to IL23 suppressed osteosarcoma growth in mice. These findings identify a novel, druggable myeloid suppressor pathway linking GRM4 to the proinflammatory IL23/IL12 axis.Significance:Few novel systemic therapies targeting osteosarcoma have emerged in the last four decades. Using insights gained from a genome-wide association study and mouse modeling, we show that GRM4 plays a role in driving osteosarcoma via a non–cell-autonomous mechanism regulating IL23, opening new avenues for therapeutic intervention.See related commentary by Jones, p. 1484.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1469

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are dimeric G-protein–coupled receptors that operate at synapses. Macroscopic and single molecule FRET to monitor structural rearrangements in the ligand binding domain (LBD) of the mGluR7/7 homodimer revealed it to have an apparent affinity ~4000-fold lower than other mGluRs and a maximal activation of only ~10%, seemingly too low for activation at synapses. However, mGluR7 heterodimerizes, and we find it to associate with mGluR2 in the hippocampus. Strikingly, the mGluR2/7 heterodimer has high affinity and efficacy. mGluR2/7 shows cooperativity in which an unliganded subunit greatly enhances activation by agonist bound to its heteromeric partner, and a unique conformational pathway to activation, in which mGluR2/7 partially activates in the Apo state, even when its LBDs are held open by antagonist. High sensitivity and an unusually broad dynamic range should enable mGluR2/7 to respond to both glutamate transients from nearby release and spillover from distant synapses.