Placebo effects illustrate how strongly expectations can shape symptom perception and treatment outcomes. Contemporary Bayesian accounts have provided valuable insights by formalising how expectations are integrated with sensory information. However, such accounts can struggle to explain why treatment expectations persist despite disconfirming evidence and why placebo responses vary widely across individuals. We argue that placebo effects arise from richer inferential processes in which the individual aims to make sense of their observations through inferred explanatory states that are shaped by their motivational preferences and guide the interpretation of treatment effects. Combining Bayesian principles with latent-state inference and higher-level beliefs provides a more comprehensive account of placebo effects and highlights new opportunities for neuroscience and clinical practice.
Abstract The somatosensory system encodes peripheral inputs through a sequence of ascending neural relays spanning spinal, subcortical and cortical levels. While multivariate decoding of electroencephalography (EEG) signals has demonstrated that cortical activity contains fine-grained information about somatosensory stimuli, the extent to which earlier processing stages contribute additional, non-redundant information remains unclear. To address this gap, we investigated a dataset comprising peripheral sensory stimulation and mixed stimulation (i.e., stimulation engaging both sensory and motor fibers). We assessed whether stimulation characteristics can be decoded from spinal recordings using high-density electrospinography (ESG), and whether combining ESG with EEG enhances decoding performance. Decoding accuracy varied systematically with both stimulation type and signal modality. ESG was the most informative signal for mixed and mixed vs sensory discrimination, reaching an average accuracy of ∼98%, while EEG provided a relative advantage for purely sensory tasks, though absolute accuracy remained more modest for both modalities. Critically, combining the two modalities together consistently matched or outperformed either one, used alone, across all conditions, with gains most pronounced for mixed vs sensory discrimination. Multi-subject generalization improved progressively with training-set size, rising to ∼88% with 15 training subjects for mixed classification, suggesting that subject-independent decoding of motor intent may be achievable when models are trained on a larger number of subjects. Taken together, these results establish that spinal ESG signals carry decodable information about peripheral stimulation that is complementary to and not redundant with cortical EEG. This finding supports a multilevel framework for decoding sensorimotor processing in humans and motivates the development of dual-modality brain–machine interfaces that leverage both cortical and spinal signals to improve the control of neurostimulation and assistive devices.
Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) is a relatively recent method for non-invasively modulating neural activity in the spinal cord. Despite its growing prominence, comprehensive studies addressing its potential adverse effects (AEs) and unspecific effects (UEs) are lacking. In this study, we conducted a systematic investigation of the potential AEs and UEs of tsDCS in healthy volunteers (N=20) who underwent a double-blind within-participant design, employing anodal, cathodal, and sham tsDCS of the thoracolumbar spinal cord. Our approach involved utilizing a newly developed structured questionnaire (to assess subjectively reported AEs) in combination with tsDCS-concurrent recording of skin conductance, cardiac and respiratory activity (to assess UEs in bodily state). The most frequent participant-reported AEs were sensations of burning, tingling, and itching, although they were largely described as mild; skin redness (experimenter-reported) occurred even more frequently. Importantly, when comparing AEs between active and sham tsDCS via frequentist and Bayesian analysis approaches, the results were largely in favour of no difference between conditions (with the exception of skin redness). A similar picture emerged for most UE metrics, suggesting that tsDCS does not induce changes in bodily state, at least as measured by our autonomic nervous system metrics. We believe that the strategy employed here could serve as a starting point for a systematic AE and UE assessment in clinical populations, longitudinal designs, and when targeting different spinal sites. Taken together, our results contribute to assessing the tolerability and specificity of tsDCS, in order to further the application of this spinal neuromodulation method in health and disease.
Morphometric measures derived from spinal cord segmentations can serve as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in neurological diseases and injuries affecting the spinal cord. For instance, the spinal cord cross-sectional area can be used to monitor cord atrophy in multiple sclerosis and to characterize compression in degenerative cervical myelopathy. While robust, automatic segmentation methods to a wide variety of contrasts and pathologies have been developed over the past few years, whether their predictions are stable as the model is updated using new datasets has not been assessed. This is particularly important for deriving normative values from healthy participants. In this study, we present a spinal cord segmentation model trained on a multisite (n = 75 sites, 1,631 participants) dataset, including 9 different MRI contrasts and several spinal cord pathologies. We also introduce a lifelong learning framework to automatically monitor the morphometric drift as the model is updated using additional datasets. The framework is triggered by an automatic GitHub Actions workflow every time a new model is created, recording the morphometric values derived from the model’s predictions over time. As a real-world application of the proposed framework, we employed the spinal cord segmentation model to update a recently introduced normative database of healthy participants containing commonly used measures of spinal cord morphometry. Results showed that (i) our model performs well compared with its previous versions and existing pathology-specific models on the lumbar spinal cord, images with severe compression, and in the presence of intramedullary lesions and/or atrophy achieving an average Dice score of 0.95 ± 0.03; (ii) the automatic workflow for monitoring morphometric drift provides a quick feedback loop for developing future segmentation models; and (iii) the scaling factor required to update the database of morphometric measures is nearly constant among slices across the given vertebral levels, showing minimum drift between the current and previous versions of the model monitored by the framework. The code and model are open source and accessible via Spinal Cord Toolbox v7.0.
Segmentation of spinal nerve rootlets is relevant for spinal level estimation, lesion classification, neuromodulation therapy, and group-level analyses. The aim of this study was to develop a deep learning method for the automatic segmentation of C2-T1 dorsal and ventral spinal nerve rootlets on various MRI scans. The study included MRI scans from two open-access and one private dataset, consisting of 3D isotropic 3T turbo spin echo T2-weighted (T2w) and 7T MP2RAGE (T1-weighted [T1w] INV1 and INV2, and UNIT1) MRI scans. A deep learning model, RootletSeg, was developed on 93 MRI scans from 50 healthy adults (mean age, 28.70 years ± 6.53 [SD]; 28 [56%] males, 22 [44%] females) and achieved a mean ± SD Dice score of 0.67 ± 0.09 for T1w-INV2, 0.65 ± 0.11 for UNIT1, 0.64 ± 0.08 for T2w, and 0.62 ± 0.10 for T1w-INV1 contrasts. RootletSeg accurately segmented C2-T1 spinal rootlets across MRI contrasts, enabling the determination of spinal levels directly from MRI scans. The method is open-source and can be used for a variety of downstream analyses.
The spinal cord is an important component of the central nervous system for the processing of sensorimotor information transmitted between the body and the brain. Electrospinography (ESG) is the most accessible non-invasive technique for recording spinal signals in humans, but the detrimental impact of physiological noise (mostly of cardiac nature) has prevented widespread adoption. Here, we aim to address this issue by examining various denoising algorithms for cardiac artefact reduction-including approaches based on principal component analysis (PCA), independent component analysis (ICA), signal space projection (SSP), canonical correlation analysis (CCA), and denoising separation of sources (DSS). We observed that in situations where large number of spinal electrodes are used, ICA and SSP offer the best results in terms of balancing the removal of noise and preserving neural information of interest. In cases where only a small number of electrodes are available, an approach based on PCA is deemed helpful. Finally, we also approached this issue from a signal-enhancement perspective by applying CCA and DSS directly to signals of interest, namely spinal somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs, especially the N13 and N22 components in the cervical and lumbar spinal cord, respectively). We observed that in cases where extensive electrode arrays are used in the context of task-based designs, CCA reveals clear evoked spinal potentials even with single-trial resolution. Taken together, there are several appropriate algorithms for physiological noise removal and/or signal enhancement in ESG, rendering this an accessible and easy-to-use technique for non-invasive assessments of human spinal cord function.
Clinical research emphasizes the implementation of rigorous and reproducible study designs that rely on between-group matching or controlling for sources of biological variation such as subject's sex and age. However, corrections for body size (i.e., height and weight) are mostly lacking in clinical neuroimaging designs. This study investigates the importance of body size parameters in their relationship with spinal cord (SC) and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics. Data were derived from a cosmopolitan population of 267 healthy human adults (age 30.1 ± 6.6 years old, 125 females). We show that body height correlates with brain gray matter (GM) volume, cortical GM volume, total cerebellar volume, brainstem volume, and cross-sectional area (CSA) of cervical SC white matter (CSA-WM; 0.44 ≤ r ≤ 0.62). Intracranial volume (ICV) correlates with body height (r = 0.46) and the brain volumes and CSA-WM (0.37 ≤ r ≤ 0.77). In comparison, age correlates with cortical GM volume, precentral GM volume, and cortical thickness (-0.21 ≥ r ≥ -0.27). Body weight correlates with magnetization transfer ratio in the SC WM, dorsal columns, and lateral corticospinal tracts (-0.20 ≥ r ≥ -0.23). Body weight further correlates with the mean diffusivity derived from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in SC WM (r = -0.20) and dorsal columns (-0.21), but only in males. CSA-WM correlates with brain volumes (0.39 ≤ r ≤ 0.64), and with precentral gyrus thickness and DTI-based fractional anisotropy in SC dorsal columns and SC lateral corticospinal tracts (-0.22 ≥ r ≥ -0.25). Linear mixture of age, sex, or sex and age, explained 2 ± 2%, 24 ± 10%, or 26 ± 10%, of data variance in brain volumetry and SC CSA. The amount of explained variance increased to 33 ± 11%, 41 ± 17%, or 46 ± 17%, when body height, ICV, or body height and ICV were added into the mixture model. In females, the explained variances halved suggesting another unidentified biological factor(s) determining females' central nervous system (CNS) morphology. In conclusion, body size and ICV are significant biological variables. Along with sex and age, body size should therefore be included as a mandatory variable in the design of clinical neuroimaging studies examining SC and brain structure; and body size and ICV should be considered as covariates in statistical analyses. Normalization of different brain regions with ICV diminishes their correlations with body size, but simultaneously amplifies ICV-related variance (r = 0.72 ± 0.07) and suppresses volume variance of the different brain regions (r = 0.12 ± 0.19) in the normalized measurements.
Repetition suppression, the reduced neural response upon repeated presentation of a stimulus, can be explained by models focusing on bottom-up (i.e., adaptation) or top-down (i.e., expectation) mechanisms. Predictive coding models fall into the latter category and propose that repetitions are expected and therefore elicit smaller prediction error responses. Although studies in the visual and auditory domain provide some support for such models, in nociception evidence remains inconclusive, despite the substantial influence expectations exert on pain perception. To assess expectation effects on repetition suppression in nociception, we developed a paradigm in which healthy volunteers received brief CO2 laser stimuli, while we acquired electroencephalographic (EEG) and peripheral physiological data. Importantly, laser stimuli could be either repeated after one second or not be repeated, with the probability of repetitions manipulated in a block-wise fashion, such that repetitions were either expected or unexpected. We observed repetition suppression in laser-evoked potentials and laser-induced gamma band oscillations, but not in laser-induced desynchronizations in the alpha and beta band. Critically, neither these EEG responses, nor the peripheral physiological data showed significant differences between the expectation conditions, with Bayesian analyses mostly providing evidence for an absence of effects. This indicates that repetition suppression to brief nociceptive laser stimuli is not driven by top-down factors, but rather mediated by other adaptation processes. Although this does not preclude an influence of predictive coding models in nociception, it suggests that when the nervous system receives highly precise input, its responses are less susceptible to influence from expectations.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We show that repetition suppression (RS; the diminished neural activity upon repeated stimulus presentation) can be observed in the nociceptive domain: brief laser stimuli lead to RS in event-related potentials and gamma oscillations. Importantly, nociceptive RS is not modulated by repetition probability and thus expectations regarding the occurrence of a repetition. This indicates that nociceptive responses are less prone to top-down expectations under conditions of limited sensory uncertainty, as established via precise laser stimuli.
Purpose: The depth within the body, small diameter, long length, and varying tissue surrounding the spinal cord impose specific considerations when designing radiofrequency coils. The optimal coil configuration for 7 T cervical spinal cord MRI is unknown and, currently, there are very few coil options. The purpose of this work was (1) to establish a quality control protocol for evaluating 7 T cervical spinal cord coils and (2) to use that protocol to evaluate the performance of 4 different coil designs. Methods: Three healthy volunteers and a custom anthropomorphic phantom (the traveling spines cohort) were scanned at seven 7 T imaging centers using a common protocol and each center's specific cervical spinal cord coil. Four different coil designs were tested (two in-house, one Rapid Biomedical, and one MRI.TOOLS design). Results: The Rapid Biomedical coil was found to have the highest B1+ efficiency, whereas one of the in-house designs (NeuroPoly Lab) had the highest SNR and the largest spinal cord coverage. The MRI.TOOLS coil had the most uniform B1+ profile along the cervical spinal cord; however, it was limited in its ability to provide the requested flip angles (especially for larger individuals). The latter was also the case for the second in-house coil (MSSM). Conclusion: The results of this study serve as a guide for the spinal cord MRI community in selecting the most suitable coil based on specific requirements and offer a standardized protocol for assessing future coils.
Developments in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) at ultra-high field (UHF) now allow for insights into human brain function at mesoscopic scale. However, similar progress has not been achieved for the human spinal cord, despite its importance for reciprocal brain-body communication. Here, we therefore integrate substantial methodological improvements that enable previously unattainable high-resolution UHF spinal fMRI. Using a heat-pain paradigm in healthy volunteers, we investigate fMRI responses in the dorsal horn: we characterize their spatial pattern, establish their robustness and demonstrate that they can be reliably observed even for individual participants. Most importantly, we uncover two physiologically relevant spinal response components – phasic and tonic heat responses – that map differentially onto superficial and deep layers of the dorsal horn. Taken together, our novel UHF fMRI approach allows for differentiating responses across fundamental spinal processing units and will enable insights into human spinal cord function at mesoscopic scale in health and disease. ### Competing Interest Statement The Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences and Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging have institutional research agreements with Siemens Healthineers. N.W. holds a patent on acquisition of MRI data during spoiler gradients (US 10,401,453 B2). Max Planck Society, https://ror.org/01hhn8329 European Research Council, https://ror.org/0472cxd90, 758974
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of the spinal cord is relevant for studying sensation, movement, and autonomic function. Preprocessing of spinal cord fMRI data involves segmentation of the spinal cord on gradient-echo echo planar imaging (EPI) images. Current automated segmentation methods do not work well on these data, due to the low spatial resolution, susceptibility artifacts causing distortions and signal drop-out, ghosting, and motion-related artifacts. Consequently, this segmentation task demands a considerable amount of manual effort which takes time and is prone to user bias. In this work, we (i) gathered a multi-center dataset of spinal cord gradient-echo EPI with ground-truth segmentations and shared it on OpenNeuro https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds005143/versions/1.3.1 and (ii) developed a deep learning-based model, EPISeg, for the automatic segmentation of the spinal cord on gradient-echo EPI data. We observe a significant improvement in terms of segmentation quality compared with other available spinal cord segmentation models. Our model is resilient to different acquisition protocols as well as commonly observed artifacts in fMRI data. The training code is available at https://github.com/sct-pipeline/fmri-segmentation/, and the model has been integrated into the Spinal Cord Toolbox as a command-line tool.
Purpose Although functional MRI is widely applied in the brain, fMRI of the spinal cord is more technically demanding. Proximity to the vertebral column and lungs results in strong spatial inhomogeneity and temporal fluctuations in B 0 . Increasing field strength enables higher spatial resolution and improved sensitivity to BOLD signal, but amplifies the effects of B 0 inhomogeneity. In this work, we present the first task fMRI in the spinal cord at 7 T. Further, we compare the performance of single-shot and multi-shot 2D EPI protocols, which differ in sensitivity to spatial and temporal B 0 inhomogeneity. Methods The cervical spinal cords of 11 healthy volunteers were scanned at 7 T using single-shot 2D EPI at 0.75 mm in-plane resolution and multi-shot 2D EPI at 0.75 and 0.6 mm in-plane resolutions. All protocols used 3 mm slice thickness. For each protocol, the BOLD response to thirteen 10-second noxious thermal stimuli applied to the right thumb was acquired in a 10-minute fMRI run. Image quality, temporal SNR, and BOLD activation (percent signal change and z-stat) at both individual-and group-level were evaluated between the protocols. Results Temporal SNR was highest in single-shot and multi-shot 0.75 mm protocols. In group-level analyses, activation clusters appeared in all protocols in the ipsilateral dorsal quadrant at the expected C6 neurological level. In individual-level analyses, activation clusters at the expected level were detected in some, but not all subjects and protocols. Single-shot 0.75 mm generally produced the highest mean z-statistic, while multi-shot 0.60 mm produced the best-localized activation clusters and the least geometric distortion. Larger than expected within-subject segmental variation of BOLD activation along the cord was observed. Conclusion Group-level sensory task fMRI of the cervical spinal cord is feasible at 7 T with single-shot or multi-shot EPI. The best choice of protocol will likely depend on the relative importance of sensitivity to activation versus spatial localization of activation for a given experiment. Highlights First stimulus task fMRI results in the spinal cord at 7 T Single-shot 0.75 mm 2D EPI produced the highest mean z-statistic Multi-shot 0.60 mm 2D EPI provided the best-localized activation and least distortion
The spinal cord is of fundamental importance for integrative processing in brain-body communication, yet routine noninvasive recordings in humans are hindered by vast methodological challenges. Here, we overcome these challenges by developing an easy-to-use electrophysiological approach based on high-density multichannel spinal recordings combined with multivariate spatial-filtering analyses. These advances enable a spatiotemporal characterization of spinal cord responses and demonstrate a sensitivity that permits assessing even single-trial responses. To furthermore enable the study of integrative processing along the neural processing hierarchy in somatosensation, we expand this approach by simultaneous peripheral, spinal, and cortical recordings and provide direct evidence that bottom-up integrative processing occurs already within the spinal cord and thus after the first synaptic relay in the central nervous system. Finally, we demonstrate the versatility of this approach by providing noninvasive recordings of nociceptive spinal cord responses during heat-pain stimulation. Beyond establishing a new window on human spinal cord function at millisecond timescale, this work provides the foundation to study brain-body communication in its entirety in health and disease.
Clinical research emphasizes the implementation of rigorous and reproducible study designs that rely on between-group matching or controlling for sources of biological variation such as subject's sex and age. However, corrections for body size (i.e. height and weight) are mostly lacking in clinical neuroimaging designs. This study investigates the importance of body size parameters in their relationship with spinal cord (SC) and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics. Data were derived from a cosmopolitan population of 267 healthy human adults (age 30.1±6.6 years old, 125 females). We show that body height correlated strongly or moderately with brain gray matter (GM) volume, cortical GM volume, total cerebellar volume, brainstem volume, and cross-sectional area (CSA) of cervical SC white matter (CSA-WM; 0.44≤r≤0.62). In comparison, age correlated weakly with cortical GM volume, precentral GM volume, and cortical thickness (-0.21≥r≥-0.27). Body weight correlated weakly with magnetization transfer ratio in the SC WM, dorsal columns, and lateral corticospinal tracts (-0.20≥r≥-0.23). Body weight further correlated weakly with the mean diffusivity derived from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in SC WM (r=-0.20) and dorsal columns (-0.21), but only in males. CSA-WM correlated strongly or moderately with brain volumes (0.39≤r≤0.64), and weakly with precentral gyrus thickness and DTI-based fractional anisotropy in SC dorsal columns and SC lateral corticospinal tracts (-0.22≥r≥-0.25). Linear mixture of sex and age explained 26±10% of data variance in brain volumetry and SC CSA. The amount of explained variance increased at 33±11% when body height was added into the mixture model. Age itself explained only 2±2% of such variance. In conclusion, body size is a significant biological variable. Along with sex and age, body size should therefore be included as a mandatory variable in the design of clinical neuroimaging studies examining SC and brain structure.
Sensory information processing in the central nervous system (CNS) requires both post-synaptic responses and spiking activity, with human electroencephalography (EEG) research largely focused on the former. However, EEG data also contain high-frequency oscillations (HFOs), which have been linked to cortical spike bursts in animal models, thus providing a non-invasive macroscopic marker of population spiking in humans. Here, we go beyond cortical processing and demonstrate that it is possible to simultaneously record HFOs to somatosensory stimulation across the entire human CNS - from spinal cord over subcortical to cortical processing stages. Using multivariate spatial filtering approaches in two independent datasets, we identify replicable and generalizable HFOs across the CNS and obtain a detailed characterization of these signals at each processing level. Finally, we provide evidence at the between- and within-individual level that low and high frequency electrophysiological responses represent at least partly independent information across the CNS. Taken together, our approach offers the first evidence that it is possible to detect and characterise HFOs simultaneously across the CNS, providing a unique non-invasive and multi-level window into human neurophysiology in health and disease. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.
Spinal cord fMRI is challenging, in part due to B0 inhomogeneities. An EPI, z-shimming signal intensity based approach was implemented to automatically and dynamically shim the spinal cord. The technique was implemented in the open-source Shimming Toolbox. Z-shimming was tested on a healthy participant and showed a 14% increase in signal intensity as well as 19% increase in tSNR. The technique was generalized to allow for the use of any shim coil geometry as well as non-EPI data.
The application of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to the human spinal cord is still a relatively small field of research and faces many challenges. Here we aimed to probe the limitations of task-based spinal fMRI at 3T by investigating the reliability of spinal cord blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) responses to repeated nociceptive stimulation across two consecutive days in 40 healthy volunteers. We assessed the test-retest reliability of subjective ratings, autonomic responses, and spinal cord BOLD responses to short heat pain stimuli (1s duration) using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). At the group level, we observed robust autonomic responses as well as spatially specific spinal cord BOLD responses at the expected location, but no spatial overlap in BOLD response patterns across days. While autonomic indicators of pain processing showed good-to-excellent reliability, both β-estimates and z-scores of task-related BOLD responses showed poor reliability across days in the target region (gray matter of the ipsilateral dorsal horn). When taking into account the sensitivity of gradient-echo echo planar imaging (GE-EPI) to draining vein signals by including the venous plexus in the analysis, we observed BOLD responses with fair reliability across days. Taken together, these results demonstrate that heat pain stimuli as short as one second are able to evoke a robust and spatially specific BOLD response, which is however strongly variable within participants across time, resulting in low reliability in the dorsal horn gray matter. Further improvements in data acquisition and analysis techniques are thus necessary before event-related spinal cord fMRI as used here can be reliably employed in longitudinal designs or clinical settings.
Since the first report of transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) on humans in 20081, more than 50 experimental studies have been published. However, systematic reports of adverse effects (AEs) and unspecific effects (UEs) of tsDCS are scarce. In this study, we aimed to systematically record tsDCS AEs via a structured questionnaire and also record UEs via tsDCS – concurrent monitoring of skin conductance, electrocardiographic and respiratory activity.
The investigation of spontaneous fluctuations of the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal has recently been extended from the brain to the spinal cord, where it has stimulated interest from a clinical perspective. A number of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have demonstrated robust functional connectivity between the time series of BOLD fluctuations in bilateral dorsal horns and between those in bilateral ventral horns, in line with the functional neuroanatomy of the spinal cord. A necessary step prior to extension to clinical studies is assessing the reliability of such resting-state signals, which we aimed to do here in a group of 45 healthy young adults at the clinically prevalent field strength of 3T. When investigating connectivity in the entire cervical spinal cord, we observed fair to good reliability for dorsal-dorsal and ventral-ventral connectivity, whereas reliability was poor for within-and between-hemicord dorsal-ventral connectivity. Considering how prone spinal cord fMRI is to noise, we extensively investigated the impact of distinct noise sources and made two crucial observations: removal of physiological noise led to a reduction in functional connectivity strength and reliability - due to the removal of stable and participant-specific noise patterns - whereas removal of thermal noise considerably increased the detectability of functional connectivity without a clear influence on reliability. Finally, we also assessed connectivity within spinal cord segments and observed that while the pattern of connectivity was similar to that of whole cervical cord, reliability at the level of single segments was consistently poor. Taken together, our results demonstrate the presence of reliable resting-state functional connectivity in the human spinal cord even after thoroughly accounting for physiological and thermal noise, but at the same time urge caution if focal changes in connectivity (e.g. due to segmental lesions) are to be studied, especially in a longitudinal manner.