BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO) is the leading cause of transfusion-related morbidity and mortality. We evaluated the incidence of TACO and its association with new fever (HOT-TACO) at a comprehensive cancer centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Retrospective review of haemovigilance data (July 2019-October 2020) identified 100 possible to definite TACO cases. TACO cases were classified as HOT-TACO or regular TACO, differentiated by an association with new-onset fever. Both groups were assessed by type, age of blood products involved, reaction severity, cancer diagnosis and white blood cells (WBC) counts. RESULTS:Among 1382 transfusion reactions in a 15-month period, 111 cases of TACO (8%) were diagnosed. A total of 100 adult TACO cases were included in this study; 16% of them were HOT-TACO cases. The median WBC counts pre- and post-transfusion in the HOT-TACO versus regular-TACO group were not statistically different (pre- 5.400 vs. 2.050, p = 0.19; post 4.100 vs. 1.900, p = 0.45). However, the HOT-TACO group had a 2.7-fold higher pre-WBC and a 2.2-fold higher post-WBC when compared with the regular TACO group. There were no significant differences in age of the blood products involved, red blood cell (RBC) age (median 12 days, p = 0.34), platelet age (single donor platelet [SDP]/random donor platelet [RDP] unit) (median 5/5 days, p = 0.32/p = 0.72) or reaction severity between groups. CONCLUSION:We found an association of TACO and new fever in 16% of cases compared with 32% reported in a non-exclusive oncological setting. Findings are likely related to impaired immune response present in cancer patients associated with immunosuppression. Our findings support that fever should not be used to distinguish transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) from TACO.

OBJECTIVE:Transfusion associated sepsis is a serious risk after platelet transfusion. Although platelet culture can be performed to avoid such risk, culture results are often available after transfusion due to the 4-hour shelf-life after pooling. To decrease such risk, we implemented a needleless closed system device to culture for contamination before pooling and release for transfusion.METHODS:We customized a needleless device to permit sterile sampling of whole blood platelets without retrograde or cross-contamination. Then aliquots of platelets were injected into culture media for detection of aerobic organisms and cultured for 24 hours but released for transfusion after 12 hours of negative culture.RESULTS:In a period of two years, we used this device in 5,741 whole blood derived pooled platelets and only 24 units tested positive (0.4%) but none of initial positive was later confirmed. There were 11 Staphylococcus and 9 Bacillus species identified. All but one of the positive units were discarded; there was no clinical impact in the patient who received the positive unit.CONCLUSION:This device allows for sampling of whole blood derived platelets before pooling, warranting a transfusion of a culture negative unit after 12 hours of negative culture, consequently reducing transfusion of bacterially contaminated whole blood derived pooled platelets.

440 Background: Massive Transfusion Protocol (MTP) is a term used to describe a process to deliver blood products rapidly to treat life-threatening hemorrhage. MTPs follow a prescribed algorithm to efficiently replace blood products in set ratios. Three components of MTP include immediate availability of blood products, set types and ratios of blood products, and standardized roles for health care providers. MTP is associated with decreased morbidity and mortality compared to provider-driven decisions on blood transfusion. Methods: The Quality Improvement Assessment Board approved this initiative to standardize and create an MTP process outside of the Operating Room (OR). We assembled a multidisciplinary team to review and adopt evidence-based practices for MTP. A core group of content experts developed the relevant policy and protocol for activation and use of MTP in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), Emergency Room (ER), Interventional Radiology (IR) and inpatient floor. Simulations were held in these areas and Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) cycles used to improve the processes. Improvements included adjustment to the quantity and type of emergency release products immediately available, the timing of when platelets were delivered to providers and development of a ‘pull’ process for the Blood Bank to prepare additional blood products minimizing wastage. Following these changes, the MTP process became consistent and could be activated from all of the targeted locations. Each MTP episode was reviewed for outcomes and efficiency metrics. We held multidisciplinary care debriefings to review hemorrhagic events for areas of improvement. The OR had an existing process that was separate from this initiative, but will be aligned June 2023 and included in future analysis. Results: Baseline, from January 2022 to September 2022, 32 massive transfusion events occurred (3.5 per month). After implementation of the MTP protocol, from October 2022 to May 2023, the MTP protocol was activated 36 times (4.5 per month). There were 7 (22%) deaths at baseline and 5 (14%) after implementation. The average length of time from activation to receipt of first blood product was 26 minutes at baseline and 25 minutes with MTP. The average number of units administered at baseline included 7.7 units of red blood cells (RBC), 7.6 units fresh frozen plasma (FFP), 1 unit single donor platelets, and 2 units cryoprecipitate compared to after implementation of 6.9 units RBC, 6 units FFP, 1.6 units single donor platelets, and 3 units cryoprecipitate. The ICU was the most common MTP activation location (44%), followed by ER (19%), PICU (17%), the floor (14%) and IR (6%). Conclusions: It is feasible and safe to deploy an MTP throughout an institution. Preliminary data show a decrease in the percentage of patient deaths with use of MTP. Additional analysis are planned to evaluate the incremental improvements made with each PDSA cycle.

45 Background: MD Anderson Cancer Center is one of the largest users of blood products in the United States, with approximately 3,600 units of blood (PRBCs) transfused per month, and over 500 units of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfused per month. The wastage of blood products has both financial and patient care implications, as well as implications to donors. Decreasing blood product wastage is an institutional priority in terms of both resource utilization and cost savings. Methods: Outside metrics for the waste of blood products published by the American Association of Blood Banks (AABB) were compared to current data on the percentage wastage of blood products for fiscal year 2020. A dedicated project team set an aim to reduce the wastage of FFP by 25% from Q4 2020 to Q3 2021. Using Six Sigma principles, a run chart was developed to track units FFP ordered and transfused from October 2020 – March 2021. Minitab software was used to calculate mean FFP ordered, the upper confidence interval, as well as 2 standard deviations above the mean to determine a new maximum FFP thaw level. Results: The historical FFP “thaw level” was 32 units of FFP thawed per day. From October 2020 – March 2021, the average number of FFP units ordered per day was 8. The upper confidence level was 32, and 2 standard deviations was 24 units. After identifying 3 data points that were “out of control” and unrepresentative of actual usage, these values were adjusted to 7.5 units and 19.5 units, respectively. Based on this data, the daily thaw level was adjusted from 32 units per day to 20 units per day on June 21st 2021. As of Q3 2021, this has resulted in a 40.7% decrease in the wastage of FFP. Conclusions: The application of Six Sigma principles was an effective way to identify variation in the ordering of fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and allowed for a sizeable reduction in the daily thaw level of this blood product. Post-intervention, there has been a dramatic decline in the wastage of FFP, resulting in cost savings for our institution and better stewardship of this scare resource.

BACKGROUND:Transfusion carries a risk of transfusion reaction that is often underdiagnosed due to reliance on passive reporting. The study investigated the utility of digital methods to identify potential transfusion reactions, thus allowing real-time intervention for affected patients.METHOD:The hemovigilance unit monitored 3856 patients receiving 43,515 transfusions under the hemovigilance program. Retrospective comparison data included 298,498 transfusions. Transfusion medicine physicians designed and validated algorithms in the electronic health record that analyze discrete data, such as vital sign changes, to assign a risk score during each transfusion. Dedicated hemovigilance nurses remotely monitor all patients and perform real-time chart reviews prioritized by risk score. When a reaction is suspected, a hemovigilance trained licensed clinician responds to manage the patient and ensure data collection. Board-certified transfusion medicine physicians reviewed data and classified transfusion reactions under various categories according to the Centers for Disease Control hemovigilance definitions.RESULTS:Transfusion medicine physicians diagnosed 564 transfusion reactions (1.3% of transfusions)-a 524% increase compared to the previous passive reporting. The rapid response provider reached the bedside on average at 12.4 min demonstrating logistic feasibility. While febrile reactions were most diagnosed, recognition of transfusion-associated circulatory overload demonstrated the greatest relative increase. Auditing and education programs further enhanced transfusion reaction awareness.DISCUSSION:The model of digitally-enabled expert real-time review of clinical data that prompts rapid response improved recognition of transfusion reactions. This approach could be applied to other patient deterioration events such as early identification of sepsis.

Adoptive cell therapy with viral-specific T cells has been successfully used to treat life-threatening viral infections, supporting the application of this approach against COVID-19. We expanded SARS-CoV-2 T-cells from the peripheral blood of COVID-19-recovered donors and non-exposed controls using different culture conditions. We observed that the choice of cytokines modulates the expansion, phenotype and hierarchy of antigenic recognition by SARS-CoV-2 T-cells. Culture with IL-2/4/7 but not other cytokine-driven conditions resulted in >1000 fold expansion in SARS-CoV-2 T-cells with a retained phenotype, function and hierarchy of antigenic recognition when compared to baseline (pre-expansion) samples. Expanded CTLs were directed against structural SARS-CoV-2 proteins, including the receptor-binding domain of Spike. SARS-CoV-2 T-cells could not be efficiently expanded from the peripheral blood of non-exposed controls. Since corticosteroids are used for the management of severe COVID-19, we developed an efficient strategy to inactivate the glucocorticoid receptor gene ( NR3C1 ) in SARS-CoV-2 CTLs using CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing.

Background Patients previously infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV; indicated by positivity for anti-HBc) can experience HBV reactivation during cancer chemotherapy. Intravenous immunoglobulin infusion, which is frequently used in supportive care, might facilitate passive transfer of anti-HBc. We aimed to estimate the probability of passive transfer of anti-HBc after intravenous immunoglobulin infusion in patients with cancer. Methods We reviewed institutional databases to identify adult patients who received outpatient chemotherapy between Jan 1, 2004, and Dec 31, 2011, at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. Eligible patients had received intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, had tested negative for both anti-HBc and HBsAg before infusion, and had been tested for anti-HBc after infusion. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who became positive for anti-HBc after intravenous immunoglobulin infusion. Findings 950 of 18 874 patients who underwent chemotherapy within the study time frame received intravenous immunoglobulin, of whom 870 had been tested for anti-HBc before infusion. 199 patients who were negative for antiHBc before receiving intravenous immunoglobulin were retested after infusion, of whom 29 (15% [95% CI 10-20]) became positive for anti-HBc. The probability of anti-HBc conversion at 1 week after intravenous immunoglobulin infusion was 34% (95% CI 22-48) and at 12 weeks was 4% (2-7). Interpretation Conversion of patients from anti-HBc negativity to anti-HBc positivity was common after intravenous immunoglobulin administration. However, the probability of a positive test decreased with time since infusion. Positive anti-HBc tests done shortly after intravenous immunoglobulin infusion should be interpreted with caution because they might indicate passive transfer instead of true infection. Funding None. Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Background: Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) experience profound neutropenia; infections remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Transfusion of functional non-irradiated allogeneic granulocytes may treat or prevent infections in AML patients, and may also have anti-leukemic benefits. Study Design: Patients free of infection, with a diagnosis of AML or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing induction or first-salvage therapy were eligible. Allogeneic Granulocyte Transfusions (GTs) were administered to neutropenic (<0.5 × 109/L) patients every 3-4 days until sustained ANC recovery, initiation of new therapy, or completion of 6 weeks on study. Results: 45 patients enrolled with a median age of 67 years (range 23-83); 27 (60%) were male. Five patients (11%) never received a GT, due to donor screening failure and/or donor unavailability. 119 donors donated 156 granulocyte concentrates to the remaining 40 patients. The median number of GTs transfused per patient was 3 (range 1-9). All patients experienced >1 neutropenic fever, with an average of one infectious episode per patient. Other adverse reactions were urticaria/pruritis (n=1), rash (n=1), and hypotension (n=1). Response to leukemiadirected therapy included complete remission in 50%, overall response rate of 70%, and 8-week mortality of 8%. Median overall survival was 15 months, with 51% 1-year survival. Conclusion: Administration of non-irradiated functional allogeneic GTs to neutropenic MDS/AML patients is safe and feasible. No transfusion-associated graft-versus-host-disease (TA-GVHD) was reported and no increased toxicity was described, including among the 10% receiving subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplant. The favorable patient outcomes within this diverse group of primarily elderly AML are notable.

Perioperative and postoperative blood transfusions (BT), anemia and inflammation are associated with poor survivals in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study investigated the impact of perioperative BT on the survival of patients with NSCLC taking into account their preoperative inflammatory status and the presence of anemia. Demographic, perioperative, and survival data for 861 patients with stage I NSCLC was collected retrospectively. The primary endpoints of interest were recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Before and after propensity score matching, univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between covariates and survival. A neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) < 5 (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.38-0.87; p = 0.009) and normal Hb concentration (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.72; p = 0.022) were independently associated with longer RFS. The administration of blood perioperatively was associated with a trend towards worse RFS (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.47-1.02; p = 0.066). The multivariate analysis also revealed that an NLR < 5 (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.3-0.76; p = 0.001) and the absence of BT (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.4-0.98; p = 0.04) were significantly associated with lower mortality risk. The propensity score matching analysis did not confirm the association between BT and poor RFS (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.35-1.1; p = 0.108) and OS (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.26-1.04; p = 0.06). Inflammation and anemia are common finding in patients with stage 1 NSCLC. After adjusting for these two important confounders, this study confirms that previous reports demonstrating an association between BT and poor survival after NSCLC surgery.

Patients with cancer are often dependent on blood transfusions during treatment. Frequent vital sign monitoring during transfusions may interrupt sleep and the patient's ability to ambulate or participate in unit activities. Relying heavily on vital sign findings may also overshadow unmeasurable symptoms of transfusion reaction. The aim of this evidence-based practice initiative was to examine the evidence regarding the optimum frequency of vital sign monitoring for patients undergoing stem cell transplantation receiving blood products and to amend policy and practice to be consistent with the literature.At a GlancePatients with cancer frequently require transfusion support during treatment.Inconsistencies exist in recommendations for the frequency of vital sign monitoring during transfusion.Examining best practice guidelines suggests that less frequent vital sign monitoring may be appropriate if coupled with thoughtful physiologic assessment.

This study examined the clinical outcome of every patient who received a bacterially contaminated unit of platelets at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, during 2007. Samples of platelets were aerobically cultured and read for 1 day at 35 degrees C. Positive bottles were subcultured in the appropriate media. The effect of independent variables in the clinical outcome of patients infused with bacterially contaminated platelet units was analyzed. A total of 23,199 platelet units were transfused, 71 of which were bacterially contaminated units; 8 were apheresis platelets and 63 were whole blood platelets. Of the 71 units, 70 were contaminated with gram-positive bacteria and 1 with gram-negative bacteria. Only 1 patient developed fever, and coagulase-negative staphylococci were isolated from the transfused unit. Transfusion of fresh units and antibiotic therapy possibly explain the lack of clinical consequences in our patients.

American Journal of HematologyVolume 79, Issue 1 p. 80-80 Letters and CorrespondenceFree Access Slow infusion of platelets: A possible alternative in the management of refractory thrombocytopenic patients Aida Narvios, Aida Narvios Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TexasSearch for more papers by this authorVirgil Reddy, Virgil Reddy Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TexasSearch for more papers by this authorFernando Martinez, Fernando Martinez Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TexasSearch for more papers by this authorBenjamin Lichtiger, Benjamin Lichtiger Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TexasSearch for more papers by this author Aida Narvios, Aida Narvios Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TexasSearch for more papers by this authorVirgil Reddy, Virgil Reddy Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TexasSearch for more papers by this authorFernando Martinez, Fernando Martinez Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TexasSearch for more papers by this authorBenjamin Lichtiger, Benjamin Lichtiger Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TexasSearch for more papers by this author First published: 22 April 2005 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.20290Citations: 11AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL REFERENCE 1Dzik WH. Leukoreduced blood components: laboratory and clinical aspects. In: EC Rossi, TL Simon, GS Moss, SA Gould, editors. Principles of transfusion medicine. 2nd edition. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1995. p 353– 373. Citing Literature Volume79, Issue1May 2005Pages 80-80 ReferencesRelatedInformation