BACKGROUND:Cardiocerebral infarction (CCI), which is concomitant with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and acute ischemic stroke (AIS), is a rare but severe presentation. However, there are few data on CCI, and the treatment options are uncertain. We investigated the characteristics and outcomes of CCI compared with AMI or AIS alone. METHODS:We performed a retrospective cohort study of 120 531 patients with AMI and AIS from the national stroke and AMI registries in Singapore. Patients were categorized into AMI only, AIS only, synchronous CCI (same-day), and metachronous CCI (within 1 week). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcome was cardiovascular mortality. The mortality risks were compared using Cox regression. Multivariable models were adjusted for baseline demographics, clinical variables, and treatment for AMI or AIS. RESULTS:Of 127 919 patients identified, 120 531 (94.2%) were included; 74 219 (61.6%) patients had AMI only, 44 721 (37.1%) had AIS only, 625 (0.5%) had synchronous CCI, and 966 (0.8%) had metachronous CCI. The mean age was 67.7 (SD, 14.0) years. Synchronous and metachronous CCI had a higher risk of 30-day mortality (synchronous: adjusted HR [aHR], 2.41 [95% CI, 1.77-3.28]; metachronous: aHR, 2.80 [95% CI, 2.11-3.73]) than AMI only and AIS only (synchronous: aHR, 2.90 [95% CI, 1.87-4.51]; metachronous: aHR, 4.36 [95% CI, 3.03-6.27]). The risk of cardiovascular mortality was higher in synchronous and metachronous CCI than AMI (synchronous: aHR, 3.03 [95% CI, 2.15-4.28]; metachronous: aHR, 3.41 [95% CI, 2.50-4.65]) or AIS only (synchronous: aHR, 2.58 [95% CI, 1.52-4.36]; metachronous: aHR, 4.52 [95% CI, 2.95-6.92]). In synchronous CCI, AMI was less likely to be managed with PCI and secondary prevention medications (P<0.001) compared with AMI only. CONCLUSIONS:Synchronous CCI occurred in 1 in 200 cases of AIS and AMI. Synchronous and metachronous CCI had higher mortality than AMI or AIS alone.

OBJECTIVES:We investigated the longitudinal association between Serum Urate (SU) level and Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), Stroke, End Stage Renal Failure (ESRF) and all-cause mortality. DESIGN:We conducted a retrospective hospital-based cohort study of individuals with gout managed in specialist outpatient clinics. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate HR and 95% CI, with adjustments for potential confounders. Where the proportional hazard assumption was violated, stratified Cox regression was applied instead. SETTING:An acute care tertiary hospital in Singapore. PARTICIPANTS:Individuals with a first gout diagnosis between 2007-2017, identified through (i) primary discharge diagnosis, (ii) diagnosis from the Rheumatology SOC (iii) patient history of a clinical encounter at the Rheumatology SOC plus use of urate-lowering therapy/colchicine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:All-cause mortality, AMI, Stroke and ESRF ascertained through data linkage with the National Registry of Diseases Office. RESULTS:The final cohort comprised 2,866 individuals. Post follow-up, there were 800 deaths and 362, 218 and 191 occurrences of AMI, ESRF and stroke respectively. Compared to the reference (second-lowest) SU quartile, being in the highest SU quartile was associated with a significantly increased hazard for mortality (HR:1.66, 95% CI:1.36-2.03), incident ESRF (HR:3.02, 95% CI:2.00-4.56), and increased hazard for incident AMI (HR:1.42, 95% CI:1.06-1.91). The p-trend for all 3 outcomes was significant. No significant association was found between SU quartile and hazard for incident stroke. CONCLUSIONS:This study found that individuals with gout managed at SOC who had higher baseline SU levels had an increased hazard for all-cause mortality, ESRF, and AMI. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER:Not applicable.

10564 Background: Southeast Asia (SEA), home to over 680 million people representing almost 9% of the global population, is amongst the most diverse and fastest-growing regions in the world. This study evaluates cancer incidence and mortality in Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries with the goal of informing future research, health services, and cancer policy in the region. Methods: The number of new cases of and deaths from the leading cancers in the ASEAN region, colorectum including anus (ICD-10 C18-C21), liver including intrahepatic bile ducts (C22), lung including trachea and bronchus (C33-34), female breast (C50), cervix uteri (C53) and prostate (C61), were extracted from the International Agency for Research on Cancer GLOBOCAN 2022 database for the 10 ASEAN countries by sex and age groups. Age-standardized incidence and mortality rates (ASIR and ASMR) per 100,000 person-years are presented. Results: In 2022, breast cancer was the most common cancer among women in all ten ASEAN countries (ASIR: Singapore 72.6, Philippines 60.3, Brunei 50.2, Malaysia 46.1, Indonesia 41.8, Vietnam 38.0, Thailand 37.4, Laos 31.6, Cambodia 25.1, Myanmar 23.4). Breast cancer was also the most common cause of cancer mortality among women in five ASEAN countries (ASMR: Philippines 21.5, Malaysia 19.3, Singapore 17.8, Vietnam 14.7, Indonesia 14.4). In Thailand for which time trends are available, ASIR has risen from 19 per 100,000 in 2000 to 37.4 per 100,000 in 2022. Lung cancer was the most common cancer among men in the Philippines (ASIR 37.7), Malaysia (ASIR 23.3), Myanmar (ASIR 21.6), and Indonesia (ASIR 21.3). Lung cancer is also the leading cause of cancer death among men in the Philippines (ASMR 33.6), Singapore (ASMR 31.9), Brunei Darussalam (ASMR 23.8), Malaysia (ASMR 20.4), Myanmar (ASMR 19.9), and Indonesia (ASMR 19.0). Lung cancer is also the leading cause of cancer death among women in Brunei Darussalam (ASMR 18.4). Liver cancer contributes the greatest incidence and mortality among men in Cambodia (ASIR 39.4, ASMR 37.2), Laos (ASIR 36.5, ASMR 36.4), Vietnam (ASIR 34.9, ASMR 33.3), and Thailand (ASIR 34.4, ASMR 33.4). Liver cancer was also the leading cause of cancer death among women in Laos (ASMR 13.5), Cambodia (ASMR 13.3), and Thailand (ASMR 12.1). Cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer death amongst women in Myanmar (ASMR 13.4). Colorectum cancer is the most common cancer in men in Singapore (ASIR 39.4) and Brunei Darussalam (ASIR 37.7). Conclusions: In 2022, cancer incidence and mortality in SEA were driven primarily by breast cancer among women and lung cancer among men. Liver cancer drives incidence and mortality in Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, and Vietnam. Cervical cancer and colorectal cancer are also significant contributors to incidence and mortality in SEA. Regional and global collaboration is needed to improve cancer prevention, access to diagnosis and care, and research in Southeast Asia.

IntroductionObesity is an important risk factor for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but the interplay between metabolic health and obesity on AMI mortality has been controversial. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the risk of short- and long-term all-cause mortality by obesity and metabolic health in AMI patients using data from a multi-ethnic national AMI registry.MethodsA total of 73,382 AMI patients from the national Singapore Myocardial Infarction Registry (SMIR) were included. These patients were classified into four groups based on the presence or absence of metabolic diseases, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidaemia, and hypertension, and obesity: (1) metabolically-healthy-normal-weight (MHN); (2) metabolically-healthy-obese (MHO); (3) metabolically-unhealthy-normal-weight (MUN); and (4) metabolically-unhealthy-obese (MUO).ResultsMHO patients had reduced unadjusted risk of all-cause in-hospital, 30-day, 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year mortality following the initial MI event. However, after adjusting for potential confounders, the protective effect from MHO on post-AMI mortality was lost. Furthermore, there was no reduced risk of recurrent MI or stroke within 1-year from onset of AMI by the MHO status. However, the risk of 1-year mortality was higher in female and Malay AMI patients with MHO compared to MHN even after adjusting for confounders.ConclusionIn AMI patients with or without metabolic diseases, the presence of obesity did not affect mortality. The exception to this finding were female and Malay MHO who had worse long-term AMI mortality outcomes when compared to MHN suggesting that the presence of obesity in female and Malay patients may confer worsened outcomes.

Background Patients with prior cancer are at increased risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with poorer post-ACS outcomes. We aimed to ascertain if the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score accurately predicts mortality risk among patients with ACS and prior cancer. Methods We linked nationwide ACS and cancer registries from 2007 to 2018 in Singapore. A total of 24,529 eligible patients had in-hospital and 1-year all-cause mortality risk calculated using the GRACE score (2471 prior cancer; 22,058 no cancer). Results Patients with prior cancer had two-fold higher all-cause mortality compared to patients without cancer (in-hospital: 22.8% versus 10.3%, p < 0.001; 1-year: 49.0% vs. 18.7%, p < 0.001). Cardiovascular mortality did not differ between groups (in-hospital: 5.2% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.346; 1-year: 6.9% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.12). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the GRACE score for prediction of all-cause mortality was less for prior cancer (in-hospital: 0.64 vs. 0.80, p < 0.001; 1-year: 0.66 vs. 0.83, p < 0.001). Among patients with prior cancer and a high-risk GRACE score > 140, in-hospital revascularization was not associated with lower cardiovascular mortality than without in-hospital revascularization (6.7% vs. 7.6%, p = 0.50). Conclusions The GRACE score performs poorly in risk stratification of patients with prior cancer and ACS.

Background: Current descriptive epidemiological information on classic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) is incomplete. Published data among Asian population are particularly sparse. Methods: We conducted a large population-based study to determine the incidence rates and survival patterns of MPN reported to the Singapore Cancer Registry during the period 1968-2017. Age-standardised incidence rates (ASR), overall survival, 5-/10-year relative survival ratio (RSR) were estimated. Joinpoint regression was used to evaluate quinquennial percent change (QPC) in incidence. Results: We identified 2557 individuals diagnosed with MPN including 1031 chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), 424 polycythaemia vera (PV), 389 essential thrombocythaemia (ET), 134 primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and 579 MPN unclassifiable (MPN-U). The overall respective ASRs per 100,000 for CML, PV, ET, PMF and MPN-U were 1.24, 1.15, 1.07, 0.43, and 0.80 in 2013-2017. Males had higher ASR than females in all MPNs. A gradual rise in incidence trends of CML was observed between 1968 and 2017 (QPC 2.1%, 95% CI 0.9, 5.3). The overall incidence trends of non-CML MPNs including PV (QPC 62.9%, 95% CI 19.3, 122.6), ET (QPC 54.2%, 95% CI 23.5, 92.3) and PMF (QPC 103.5%, 95% CI 19.1, 247.6) increased sharply during 1993-2017. Survival was lower in MPNs compared with expected survival in general population: 5-year RSRs were 0.82 (95% CI 0.78, 0.86), 0.96 (95% CI 0.91, 1.01), 0.96 (95% CI 0.92, 1.01), 0.53 (95% CI 0.43, 0.65), and 0.74 (95% CI 0.68, 0.80) for CML, PV, ET, PMF and MPN-U respectively. Conclusion: CML incidence has increased marginally, whereas non-CML MPNs incidences have sharply increased. MPN patients have a lower relative survival compared to the general population, and patients with PV and ET have the most favourable relative survival. Median survival for CML patients has increased dramatically over the last 50 years.

Background: Patients with cancer are at increased risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). It is unclear if the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk score at incident AMI is reflective of this higher risk in patients with prior cancer than those without. Methods: We linked nationwide AMI and cancer registries from 2008 to 2019. A total of 18,200 eligible patients with ASCVD risk score calculated at incident AMI were identified (1086 prior cancer; 17,114 no cancer). Results: At incident AMI, age-standardized mean ASCVD risk was lower in the prior cancer group (18.6%) than no cancer group (20.9%) (p < 0.001). Prior to incident AMI, smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes mellitus were better controlled in the prior cancer group. However post-AMI, prior cancer was associated with lower guideline-directed medical therapy usage and higher all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.85, 95% confidence interval 1.66–2.07). Conclusions: AMI occurred despite better control of cardiovascular risk factors and lower age-standardized estimated mean 10-year ASCVD risk among patients with prior cancer than no cancer. Prior cancer was associated with lower guideline-directed medical therapy post-AMI and higher mortality.

BackgroundAcute myocardial infarction (AMI) cases have decreased in part due to the advent of targeted therapies for standard modifiable cardiovascular disease risk factors (SMuRF). Recent studies have reported that ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients without SMuRF (termed “SMuRF-less”) may be increasing in prevalence and have worse outcomes than “SMuRF-positive” patients. As these studies have been limited to STEMI and comprised mainly Caucasian cohorts, we investigated the changes in the prevalence and mortality of both SMuRF-less STEMI and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) patients in a multiethnic Asian population.MethodsWe evaluated 23,922 STEMI and 62,631 NSTEMI patients from a national multiethnic registry. Short-term cardiovascular and all-cause mortalities in SMuRF-less patients were compared to SMuRF-positive patients.ResultsThe proportions of SMuRF-less STEMI but not of NSTEMI have increased over the years. In hospitals, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and 1-year cardiovascular mortality were significantly higher in SMuRF-less STEMI after adjustment for age, creatinine, and hemoglobin. However, this difference did not remain after adjusting for anterior infarction, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and Killip class. There were no differences in mortality in SMuRF-less NSTEMI. In contrast to Chinese and Malay patients, SMuRF-less patients of South Asian descent had a two-fold higher risk of in-hospital all-cause mortality even after adjusting for features of increased disease severity.ConclusionSMuRF-less patients had an increased risk of mortality with STEMI, suggesting that there may be unidentified nonstandard risk factors predisposing SMuRF-less patients to a worse prognosis. This group of patients may benefit from more intensive secondary prevention strategies to improve clinical outcomes.

INTRODUCTION:Despite reports suggesting an association between COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and pericarditis and myocarditis, detailed nationwide population-based data are sparsely available. We describe the incidence of pericarditis and myocarditis by age categories and sex after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination from a nationwide mass vaccination programme in Singapore.METHODS:The incidence of adjudicated cases of pericarditis and myocarditis following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination that were reported to the vaccine safety committee between January to July 2021 was compared with the background incidence of myocarditis in Singapore.RESULTS:As of end July 2021, a total of 34 cases were reported (9 pericarditis only, 14 myocarditis only, and 11 concomitant pericarditis and myocarditis) with 7,183,889 doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine administered. Of the 9 cases of pericarditis only, all were male except one. The highest incidence of pericarditis was in males aged 12-19 years with an incidence of 1.11 cases per 100,000 doses. Of the 25 cases of myocarditis, 80% (20 cases) were male and the median age was 23 years (range 12-55 years) with 16 cases after the second dose. A higher-than-expected number of cases were seen in males aged 12-19 and 20-29 years, with incidence rates of 3.72 and 0.98 case per 100,000 doses, respectively.CONCLUSION:Data from the national registry in Singapore indicate an increased incidence of pericarditis and myocarditis in younger men after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination.

Risk stratification plays a key role in identifying acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients at higher risk of mortality. However, current AMI risk scores such as the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score were derived from predominantly Caucasian populations and may not be applicable to Asian populations. We previously developed an AMI risk score from the national-level Singapore Myocardial Infarction Registry (SMIR) confined to ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients and did not include non-STEMI (NSTEMI) patients. Here, we derived a modified SMIR risk score for both STEMI and NSTEMI patients and compared its performance to the GRACE 2.0 score for predicting 1-year all-cause mortality in our multi-ethnic population. The most significant predictor of 1-year all-cause mortality in our population using the GRACE 2.0 score was cardiopulmonary resuscitation on admission (adjusted hazards ratio [HR] 6.50), while the most significant predictor using the SMIR score was age 80–89 years (adjusted HR 7.78). Although the variables used in the GRACE 2.0 score and SMIR score were not exactly the same, the c-statistics for 1-year all-cause mortality were similar between the two scores (GRACE 2.0 0.841 and SMIR 0.865). In conclusion, we have shown that in a multi-ethnic Asian AMI population undergoing PCI, the SMIR score performed as well as the GRACE 2.0 score.

Omeprazole is commonly co-prescribed with clopidogrel. Clopidogrel requires bio-activation by cytochrome P450 CYP2C19. Omeprazole may reduce clopidogrel’s antithrombotic efficacy by inhibiting CYP2C19. Studies in Caucasians receiving omeprazole with clopidogrel showed no significant increase in death and myocardial infarction with this drug–drug interaction. There are limited large-scale studies in Asians, who may have a greater prevalence of CYP2C19 loss-of-function polymorphisms. A single centre retrospective cohort study was undertaken based on a review of medication records and prescription data. Patients prescribed clopidogrel from 2009 to 2012 were followed-up with until December 2012 (median:29 months). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality and secondary outcomes were myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular accidents, and subsequent coronary interventions. Of 12,440 patients prescribed clopidogrel, 62%(n = 7714) were on omeprazole (63.8% Chinese, 13.9% Malay, 12.4% Indian, 10.0% others), and 38%(n = 4726) were not on omeprazole or other proton pump inhibitors (62.6% Chinese, 13.5% Malay, 10.7% Indian, 13.2% others). Mortality after co-prescription occurred in 14.3%(n = 1101) of patients, compared to 6.3%(n = 300) of patients prescribed clopidogrel only. Multivariate analysis using propensity score adjusted analysis showed no significant increase in all-cause mortality with co-prescription (adjusted hazards ratio [AHR] 1.13, [95%CI 0.95–1.35]). Patients on co-prescription had a higher risk of subsequent MI (16% vs 3.8%; AHR 2.03 [95%CI 1.70–2.44]), but not of cerebrovascular accidents (5.0% vs 2.0%; AHR 0.98 [95%CI 0.76–1.27]) or coronary interventions (1.7% vs 0.7%; AHR 1.28 [95%CI 0.83–1.96]). The risk of a subsequent MI was higher in the Malay (AHR 2.43 [95%CI 1.68–3.52]) and Chinese (AHR 2.06 [95%CI 1.63–2.60]) population as compared to the Indian (AHR 1.56 [95%CI 1.06–2.31]) population. In conclusion, the use of clopidogrel with omeprazole is associated with an increased risk of MI, but not mortality or stroke, in this multi-ethnic Asian population. These risks appear to vary among different ethnic groups.

Patients with cancer are at increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. Guidelines do not address lipid profile targets for these patients. Within the lipid profiles, we hypothesized that patients with cancer develop MI or stroke at lower low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations than patients without cancer and suffer worse outcomes. We linked nationwide longitudinal MI, stroke and cancer registries from years 2007–2017. We identified 42,148 eligible patients with MI (2421 prior cancer; 39,727 no cancer) and 43,888 eligible patients with stroke (3152 prior cancer; 40,738 no cancer). Median LDL-C concentration was lower in the prior cancer group than the no cancer group at incident MI [2.43 versus 3.10 mmol/L, adjusted ratio 0.87 (95% CI 0.85–0.89)] and stroke [2.81 versus 3.22 mmol/L, adjusted ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.91–0.95)]. Similarly, median triglyceride and total cholesterol concentrations were lower in the prior cancer group, with no difference in high density lipoprotein cholesterol. Prior cancer was associated with higher post-MI mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.48, 95% CI 1.37–1.59] and post-stroke mortality (adjusted HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.52–2.52). Despite lower LDL-C concentrations, patients with prior cancer had worse post-MI and stroke mortality than patients without cancer.

Purpose: We describe the spectrum of acute neurological disorders among hospitalized patients who recently had COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. Method: We performed a prospective study at 7 acute hospitals in Singapore. Hospitalized patients who were referred for neurological complaints and had COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, in the last 6 weeks were classified into central nervous system (CNS) syndromes, cerebrovascular disorders, peripheral nervous system (PNS) disorders, autonomic nervous system (ANS) disorders and immunization stress-related responses (ISRR). Results: From 30 December 2020 to 20 April 2021, 1,398,074 persons (median age 59 years, 54.5% males) received COVID-19 mRNA vaccine (86.7% BNT162b2, 13.3% mRNA-1273); 915,344(65.5%) completed 2 doses. Four hundred and fifty-seven(0.03%) patients were referred for neurological complaints [median age 67(20-97) years, 281(61.5%) males; 95.8% received BNT162b2 and 4.2% mRNA-1273], classified into 73(16.0%) CNS syndromes, 286(62.6%) cerebrovascular disorders, 59(12.9%) PNS disorders, 0 ANS disorders and 39(8.5%) ISRRs. Eleven of 27 patients with cranial mononeuropathy had Bell's palsy. Of 33 patients with seizures, only 4 were unprovoked and occurred within 2 weeks of vaccination. All strokes occurred among individuals with preexisting cardiovascular risk factors. We recorded 2 cases of cerebral venous thrombosis; none were vaccineinduced thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Five had mild flares of immune-mediated diseases. Conclusion: Our observational study does not establish causality of the described disorders to vaccines. Though limited by the lack of baseline incidence data of several conditions, we observed no obvious signal of serious neurological morbidity associated with mRNA vaccination. The benefits of COVID-19 vaccination outweigh concerns over neurological adverse events.

Background Stress-induced hyperglycaemia at time of hospital admission has been linked to worse prognosis following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In addition to glucose, other glucose-related indices, such as HbA1c, glucose-HbA1c ratio (GHR), and stress-hyperglycaemia ratio (SHR) are potential predictors of clinical outcomes following AMI. However, the optimal blood glucose, HbA1c, GHR, and SHR cut-off values for predicting adverse outcomes post-AMI are unknown. As such, we determined the optimal blood glucose, HbA1c, GHR, and SHR cut-off values for predicting 1-year all cause mortality in diabetic and non-diabetic ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients. Methods We undertook a national, registry-based study of patients with AMI from January 2008 to December 2015. We determined the optimal blood glucose, HbA1c, GHR, and SHR cut-off values using the Youden's formula for 1-year all-cause mortality. We subsequently analyzed the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the cut-off values in the diabetic and non-diabetic subgroups, stratified by the type of AMI. Results There were 5841 STEMI and 4105 NSTEMI in the study. In STEMI patients, glucose, GHR, and SHR were independent predictors of 1-year all-cause mortality [glucose: OR 2.19 (95% CI 1.74-2.76); GHR: OR 2.28 (95% CI 1.80-2.89); SHR: OR 2.20 (95% CI 1.73-2.79)]. However, in NSTEMI patients, glucose and HbA1c were independently associated with 1-year all-cause mortality [glucose: OR 1.38 (95% CI 1.01-1.90); HbA1c: OR 2.11 (95% CI 1.15-3.88)]. In diabetic STEMI patients, SHR performed the best in terms of area-under-the-curve (AUC) analysis (glucose: AUC 63.3%, 95% CI 59.5-67.2; GHR 68.8% 95% CI 64.8-72.8; SHR: AUC 69.3%, 95% CI 65.4-73.2). However, in non-diabetic STEMI patients, glucose, GHR, and SHR performed equally well (glucose: AUC 72.0%, 95% CI 67.7-76.3; GHR 71.9% 95% CI 67.7-76.2; SHR: AUC 71.7%, 95% CI 67.4-76.0). In NSTEMI patients, glucose performed better than HbA1c for both diabetic and non-diabetic patients in AUC analysis (For diabetic, glucose: AUC 52.8%, 95% CI 48.1-57.6; HbA1c: AUC 42.5%, 95% CI 37.6-47. For non-diabetic, glucose: AUC 62.0%, 95% CI 54.1-70.0; HbA1c: AUC 51.1%, 95% CI 43.3-58.9). The optimal cut-off values for glucose, GHR, and SHR in STEMI patients were 15.0 mmol/L, 2.11, and 1.68 for diabetic and 10.6 mmol/L, 1.72, and 1.51 for non-diabetic patients respectively. For NSTEMI patients, the optimal glucose values were 10.7 mmol/L for diabetic and 8.1 mmol/L for non-diabetic patients. Conclusions SHR was the most consistent independent predictor of 1-year all-cause mortality in both diabetic and non-diabetic STEMI, whereas glucose was the best predictor in NSTEMI patients.

Abstract Background Stress-induced hyperglycaemia at time of hospital admission has been linked to worse prognosis following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The stress-hyperglycaemia ratio (SHR) index normalises the acute increase in blood glucose values to background glycaemic status. However, the optimal cut-off blood glucose and SHR values for predicting adverse outcomes post-AMI are unknown. As such, we determined the optimal blood glucose and SHR cut-offs for predicting 1-year all cause mortality in diabetic and non-diabetic non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Methods We undertook a national, registry-based study of patients with AMI from January 2008 to December 2015. We determined the optimal blood glucose and SHR cut-off values using the Youden’s formula for 1-year all-cause mortality. We subsequently analyzed the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the cut-offs in the diabetic and non-diabetic subgroups, stratified by the type of AMI. Results There were 5,841 STEMI and 4,105 NSTEMI in the study. In STEMI patients, both glucose and SHR were independent predictors of 1-year all-cause mortality [Glucose: OR 2.19 (95% CI 1.74–2.75); SHR: 2.19 (95% CI 1.73–2.78)]. However, in NSTEMI patients, glucose and SHR were not independently associated with 1-year all-cause mortality [Glucose: OR 1.37 (95% CI 1.00-1.89); SHR: 1.27 (95% CI 0.91–1.78)]. In STEMI patients, ROC analysis showed that SHR performed better than glucose (AUC for glucose 0.633 versus AUC for SHR 0.692, P < 0.001) in diabetic patients, whereas in non-diabetic patients, SHR and glucose performed equally well (AUC for glucose 0.720 versus AUC for SHR 0.717, P < 0.664). The optimal glucose cut-off values were 15.0mmol/L for diabetic STEMI patients and 11mmol/L for non-diabetic STEMI patients and the corresponding optimal cut-off values for SHR were 1.7 and 1.5, respectively. Conclusions Glucose on admission and SHR were independent predictors of 1-year all-cause mortality in STEMI, whereas this was not the case in NSTEMI patients. In STEMI setting, SHR performed better than admission glucose to predict 1-year all-cause mortality in diabetic patients, whereas in non-diabetic patients both SHR and glucose performed equally well.

Introduction: Acute myocardial infarction (MI) and acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) are leading causes of morbidity and mortality. There is scarce data examining the interplay between post-MI left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), with or without atrial fibrillation (AF), and subsequent AIS, especially in patients with milder degrees of LVSD (ejection fraction 40-49%). Evidence of an association would be helpful in developing new strategies of reducing AIS after MI. As such, we sought to study this relationship in a real-world population-based registry. Methods: This study involved linking national-level data from the Singapore Myocardial Infarction Registry with the Singapore Stroke Registry from 1st January 2007 to 31st December 2018. Both data sets have similar definitions for patient demographics. The ejection fraction (EF) and AF status were recorded during the MI episode. The outcome studied was the first instance of AIS that developed after the MI episode. We also studied the relationship between EF, AF and the severity of AIS as measured by the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Results: There were 64,512 patients available for analysis. The median age was 65.7 (IQR 56.1-76.5) and 69.5% were male. The median duration post-MI to develop AIS was 16.9 (IQR 1.6-46.1) months. There was an independent association between LVSD and the outcome of AIS (adjusted HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.10-1.27); this was evident even in mild forms of LVSD (adjusted HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06-1.27). AF was not a statistically significant predictor of AIS in post-MI patients with LVSD. Amongst patients without AF, post-MI LVSD was associated with a more severe stroke and higher NIHSS. Conclusion: Post-MI LVSD is associated with the occurrence of subsequent AIS. Although this relationship was independent of AF status, patients with LVSD but no AF had suffered a more severe AIS. These findings support the need to develop effectives therapies to prevent AIS post-MI, especially among those with LVSD.

Smoking is one of the leading risk factors for cardiovascular diseases, including ischemic heart disease and hypertension. However, in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients, smoking has been associated with better clinical outcomes, a phenomenon termed the “smoker’s paradox.” Given the known detrimental effects of smoking on the cardiovascular system, it has been proposed that the beneficial effect of smoking on outcomes is due to age differences between smokers and non-smokers and is therefore a smoker’s pseudoparadox. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between smoking status and clinical outcomes in ST-segment elevation (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), using a national multi-ethnic Asian registry. In unadjusted analyses, current smokers had better clinical outcomes following STEMI and NSTEMI. However, after adjusting for age, the protective effect of smoking was lost, confirming a smoker’s pseudoparadox. Interestingly, although current smokers had increased risk for recurrent MI within 1 year after PCI in both STEMI and NSTEMI patients, there was no increase in mortality. In summary, we confirm the existence of a smoker’s pseudoparadox in a multi-ethnic Asian cohort of STEMI and NSTEMI patients and report increased risk of recurrent MI, but not mortality, in smokers.

Lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) and triglyceride (TG) levels form the cornerstone approach of cardiovascular risk reduction, and a higher high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C) is thought to be protective. However, in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients, higher admission LDL-C and TG levels have been shown to be associated with better clinical outcomes - termed the 'lipid paradox'. We studied the relationship between lipid profile obtained within 72 hours of presentation, and all-cause mortality (during hospitalization, at 30-days and 12-months), and rehospitalization for heart failure and non-fatal AMI at 12-months in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We included 11543 STEMI and 8470 NSTEMI patients who underwent PCI in the Singapore Myocardial Infarction Registry between 2008-2015. NSTEMI patients were older (60.3 years vs 57.7 years, p < 0.001) and more likely to be female (22.4% vs 15.0%, p < 0.001). In NSTEMI, a lower LDL-C was paradoxically associated with worse outcomes for death during hospitalization, within 30-days and within 12-months (all p < 0.001), but adjustment eliminated this paradox. In contrast, the paradox for LDL-C persisted for all primary outcomes after adjustment in STEMI. For NSTEMI patients, a lower HDL-C was associated with a higher risk of death during hospitalization but in STEMI patients a lower HDL-C was paradoxically associated with a lower risk of death during hospitalization. For this endpoint, the interaction term for HDL-C and type of MI was significant even after adjustment. An elevated TG level was not protective after adjustment. These observations may be due to differing characteristics and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms in NSTEMI and STEMI.