BACKGROUND:Guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMTs), such as beta-blockers, antiplatelet drugs, lipid-lowering drugs, and renin-angiotensin system agents, have been associated with reduced risk of mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, this survival benefit conferred by GDMTs in nonagenarians and centenarians (≥ 90 years old) is not well-defined. METHODS:We investigated restricted mean survival times of patients ≥ 90 years of age with first-onset AMI treated with GDMTs from 2007 to 2020 in the Singapore Myocardial Infarction Registry. Primary analyses involved stratification by number of GDMTs prescribed at discharge, with derivation of pairwise restricted mean survival ratios free from all-cause mortality at 1, 3, and 5 years. Secondary analyses evaluated individual GDMTs within combinations of 1-3 GDMTs. RESULTS:The analysis included 3264 patients: 0 GDMTs (561 patients, 17.2%), 1-2 GDMTs (1294 patients, 39.6%), 3 GDMTs (904 patients, 27.7%), and 4 GDMTs (505 patients, 15.5%), with a median follow-up duration of 5.71 years. Patients who received 4 GDMTs at discharge were younger, had more comorbidities, were more likely to be smokers, and were more likely to have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention than those prescribed fewer GDMTs. A greater number of GDMT classes at discharge was associated with longer survival free from all-cause mortality at 1, 3, and 5 years. Each drug class within combinations of 1-3 GDMTs was associated with significant survival benefit at all time points, except for beta-blockers. CONCLUSIONS:Prescription of any number of GDMTs to nonagenarians and centenarians after first-onset AMI is associated with significant survival benefit.

An electrocardiogram (ECG) is the mainstay of cardiac evaluation available in primary care, after which assessment in relation to clinical symptoms and signs is made by family physicians to assess the patients holistically. Subsequently, based on this clinical evaluation, patients may then be referred for tertiary review at a cardiology department or managed in primary care. In Singapore, ECG abnormalities found in asymptomatic patients may require a specialist review and thus make up a substantial number of patients referred by primary care physicians from public healthcare polyclinics to cardiology outpatient clinics. Some of these patients may be clinically managed in primary care with no further evaluation necessary, yet others may require a non-urgent or expedited review.

BACKGROUND:Door-to-balloon time (DTBT) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a performance metric by which primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) services are assessed. METHODS:Consecutive patients presenting with STEMI undergoing PPCI between January 2007 to December 2019 from the Singapore Myocardial Infarction Registry were included. Patients were stratified based on DTBT (≤60 min, 61-90 min, 91-180 min) and Killip status (I-III vs. IV). Outcomes assessed included all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 30-days and 1-year. RESULTS:In total, 13,823 patients were included, with 82.59% achieving DTBT ≤90 min and 49.77% achieving DTBT ≤60 min. For Killip I-III (n = 11,591,83.85%), the median DTBT was 60[46-78]min. The 30-day all-cause mortality for DTBT of ≤60 min, 61-90 min and 91-180 min was 1.08%, 2.17% and 4.33% respectively (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, however, there was no significant difference for 30-day and 1-year outcomes across all DTBT (p > 0.05). For Killip IV, the median DTBT was 68[51-91]min. The 30-day all-cause mortality for DTBT of ≤60 min, 61-90 min and 91-180 min was 11.74%, 20.48% and 35.06% respectively (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis for 30-day and 1-year outcomes, DTBT 91-180 min was an independent predictor of worse outcomes (p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between DTBT of ≤60 min and 61-90 min (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION:In Killip I-III patients, DTBT had no significant impact on outcomes upon adjustment for confounders. Conversely, for Killip IV patients, a DTBT of >90 min was associated with significantly higher adverse outcomes, with no differences between a DTBT of ≤60 min vs. 61-90 min. Outcomes in STEMI involve a complex interplay of factors and recommendations of a lowered DTBT of ≤60 min will require further evaluation.

BACKGROUND:The administration of intravenous cangrelor at reperfusion achieves faster onset of platelet P2Y12 inhibition than oral ticagrelor and has been shown to reduce myocardial infarction (MI) size in the preclinical setting. We hypothesized that the administration of cangrelor at reperfusion will reduce MI size and prevent microvascular obstruction in patients with ST-segment-elevation MI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS:This was a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted between November 2017 to November 2021 in 6 cardiac centers in Singapore. Patients were randomized to receive either cangrelor or placebo initiated before the primary percutaneous coronary intervention procedure on top of oral ticagrelor. The key exclusion criteria included presenting <6 hours of symptom onset; previous MI and stroke or transient ischemic attack; on concomitant oral anticoagulants; and a contraindication for cardiovascular magnetic resonance. The primary efficacy end point was acute MI size by cardiovascular magnetic resonance within the first week expressed as percentage of the left ventricle mass (%LVmass). Microvascular obstruction was identified as areas of dark core of hypoenhancement within areas of late gadolinium enhancement. The primary safety end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium-defined major bleeding in the first 48 hours. Continuous variables were compared by Mann-Whitney U test (reported as median [first quartile-third quartile]), and categorical variables were compared by Fisher exact test. A 2-sided P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS:Of 209 recruited patients, 164 patients (78%) completed the acute cardiovascular magnetic resonance scan. There were no significant differences in acute MI size (placebo, 14.9% [7.3-22.6] %LVmass versus cangrelor, 16.3 [9.9-24.4] %LVmass; P=0.40) or the incidence (placebo, 48% versus cangrelor, 47%; P=0.99) and extent of microvascular obstruction (placebo, 1.63 [0.60-4.65] %LVmass versus cangrelor, 1.18 [0.53-3.37] %LVmass; P=0.46) between placebo and cangrelor despite a 2-fold decrease in platelet reactivity with cangrelor. There were no Bleeding Academic Research Consortium-defined major bleeding events in either group in the first 48 hours. CONCLUSIONS:Cangrelor administered at the time of primary percutaneous coronary intervention did not reduce acute MI size or prevent microvascular obstruction in patients with ST-segment-elevation MI given oral ticagrelor despite a significant reduction of platelet reactivity during the percutaneous coronary intervention procedure. REGISTRATION:URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03102723.

BACKGROUND:Cardiocerebral infarction (CCI), which is concomitant with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and acute ischemic stroke (AIS), is a rare but severe presentation. However, there are few data on CCI, and the treatment options are uncertain. We investigated the characteristics and outcomes of CCI compared with AMI or AIS alone. METHODS:We performed a retrospective cohort study of 120 531 patients with AMI and AIS from the national stroke and AMI registries in Singapore. Patients were categorized into AMI only, AIS only, synchronous CCI (same-day), and metachronous CCI (within 1 week). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcome was cardiovascular mortality. The mortality risks were compared using Cox regression. Multivariable models were adjusted for baseline demographics, clinical variables, and treatment for AMI or AIS. RESULTS:Of 127 919 patients identified, 120 531 (94.2%) were included; 74 219 (61.6%) patients had AMI only, 44 721 (37.1%) had AIS only, 625 (0.5%) had synchronous CCI, and 966 (0.8%) had metachronous CCI. The mean age was 67.7 (SD, 14.0) years. Synchronous and metachronous CCI had a higher risk of 30-day mortality (synchronous: adjusted HR [aHR], 2.41 [95% CI, 1.77-3.28]; metachronous: aHR, 2.80 [95% CI, 2.11-3.73]) than AMI only and AIS only (synchronous: aHR, 2.90 [95% CI, 1.87-4.51]; metachronous: aHR, 4.36 [95% CI, 3.03-6.27]). The risk of cardiovascular mortality was higher in synchronous and metachronous CCI than AMI (synchronous: aHR, 3.03 [95% CI, 2.15-4.28]; metachronous: aHR, 3.41 [95% CI, 2.50-4.65]) or AIS only (synchronous: aHR, 2.58 [95% CI, 1.52-4.36]; metachronous: aHR, 4.52 [95% CI, 2.95-6.92]). In synchronous CCI, AMI was less likely to be managed with PCI and secondary prevention medications (P<0.001) compared with AMI only. CONCLUSIONS:Synchronous CCI occurred in 1 in 200 cases of AIS and AMI. Synchronous and metachronous CCI had higher mortality than AMI or AIS alone.

IntroductionObesity is an important risk factor for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but the interplay between metabolic health and obesity on AMI mortality has been controversial. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the risk of short- and long-term all-cause mortality by obesity and metabolic health in AMI patients using data from a multi-ethnic national AMI registry.MethodsA total of 73,382 AMI patients from the national Singapore Myocardial Infarction Registry (SMIR) were included. These patients were classified into four groups based on the presence or absence of metabolic diseases, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidaemia, and hypertension, and obesity: (1) metabolically-healthy-normal-weight (MHN); (2) metabolically-healthy-obese (MHO); (3) metabolically-unhealthy-normal-weight (MUN); and (4) metabolically-unhealthy-obese (MUO).ResultsMHO patients had reduced unadjusted risk of all-cause in-hospital, 30-day, 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year mortality following the initial MI event. However, after adjusting for potential confounders, the protective effect from MHO on post-AMI mortality was lost. Furthermore, there was no reduced risk of recurrent MI or stroke within 1-year from onset of AMI by the MHO status. However, the risk of 1-year mortality was higher in female and Malay AMI patients with MHO compared to MHN even after adjusting for confounders.ConclusionIn AMI patients with or without metabolic diseases, the presence of obesity did not affect mortality. The exception to this finding were female and Malay MHO who had worse long-term AMI mortality outcomes when compared to MHN suggesting that the presence of obesity in female and Malay patients may confer worsened outcomes.

The COVID -19 pandemic impacted acute myocardial infarction (AMI) attendances, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treatments, and outcomes. We collated data from majority of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI)-capable public healthcare centres in Singapore to understand the initial impact COVID-19 had on essential time-critical emergency services. We present data comparisons from 'Before Disease Outbreak Response System Condition (DORSCON) Orange', 'DORSCON Orange to start of circuit breaker (CB)', and during the first month of 'CB'. We collected aggregate numbers of weekly elective PCI from four centres and AMI admissions, PPCI, and in-hospital mortality from five centres. Exact door-to-balloon (DTB) times were recorded for one centre; another two reported proportions of DTB times exceeding targets. Median weekly elective PCI cases significantly decreased from 'Before DORSCON Orange' to 'DORSCON Orange to start of CB' (34 vs 22.5, P = 0.013). Median weekly STEMI admissions and PPCI did not change significantly. In contrast, the median weekly non-STEMI (NSTEMI) admissions decreased significantly from 'Before DORSCON Orange' to 'DORSCON Orange to start of CB' (59 vs 48, P = 0.005) and were sustained during CB (39 cases). Exact DTB times reported by one centre showed no significant change in the median. Out of three centres, two reported significant increases in the proportion that exceeded DTB targets. In-hospital mortality rates remained static. In Singapore, STEMI and PPCI rates remained stable, while NSTEMI rates decreased during DORSCON Orange and CB. The severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) experience may have helped prepare us to maintain essential services such as PPCI during periods of acute healthcare resource strain. However, data must be monitored and increased pandemic preparedness measures must be explored to ensure that AMI care is not adversely affected by continued COVID fluctuations and future pandemics.

Abstract Background/introduction Type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI), caused by myocardial oxygen supply/demand mismatch without acute thrombotic plaque disruption, makes up 2-25% of reported MI. T2MI may be triggered by conditions such as arrhythmias, anaemia, sepsis, heart failure, but the incidence, outcomes and predictors of poor outcomes post-T2MI requires further study. Aims In this study, we characterised the incidence, outcomes and predictors of poor outcomes in T2MI in Singapore. Methods We performed an ambidirectional cohort study of 10720 consecutive T2MI patients from January 2012 to December 2018 from the national Singapore MI Registry (SMIR). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; composite of MI, stroke and mortality) within 30 days and 1 year. The secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death and stroke. Results Of 10,724 patients with T2MI, 3852 (35.9%) had MACE within 30 days and 5947 (51.4%) had MACE within 1 year (Table 1). The incidence of T2MI increased from 20 per 100,000 residents in 2012 to 80 per 100,000 residents in 2017 (Figure 1A). Significant independent predictors of MACE at 30 days on multivariable analysis include age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-1.01), history of hypertension (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.06-1.42) or diabetes mellitus (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.17-1.48), Killip classes 2-4 and left ventricular ejection fraction <50% during hospitalization. Low hemoglobin (Hb) 8-9 (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.07-1.88) and 10-11 (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.05-1.76) compared to Hb 14-15, were predictors of MACE at 30 days and Hb <13 showed significant associated with MACE at 1 year. Hb <12 was also significantly associated with all-cause mortality at 1 year, but not cardiovascular death or stroke. Significant predictors of stroke at 1 year included current smoking (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.04-2.23) and atrial fibrillation (AF) (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.21-1.97). Troponin levels were not significantly associated with MACE at 30 days or 1 year. Conclusions The incidence of T2MI has been increasing since 2012, with generally poor outcomes within 1 year. Predictors of poor outcomes include age, history of cardiovascular risk factors, AF, reduced LVEF during hospitalization, and low hemoglobin. A higher target Hb may be needed post-T2MI, and further research is needed to establish this.

INTRODUCTION:Data on heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) is still emerging, especially in Asian populations. This study aims to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of Asian HFmrEF patients with those of HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS:Patients admitted nationally for HF between 2008 and 2014 were included in the study. They were categorised according to ejection fraction (EF). Patients with EF <40%, EF 40%-49% and EF ≥50% were categorised into the following groups: HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF, respectively. All patients were followed up till December 2016. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular death and/or HF rehospitalisations. RESULTS:A total of 16,493 patients were included in the study - HFrEF, n = 7,341 (44.5%); HFmrEF, n = 2,272 (13.8%); and HFpEF n = 6,880 (41.7%). HFmrEF patients were more likely to be gender neutral, of mid-range age and have concomitant diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidaemia, peripheral vascular disease and coronary artery disease ( P < 0.001). The two-year overall mortality rates for HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF were 32.9%, 31.8% and 29.1%, respectively. HFmrEF patients had a significantly lower overall mortality rate compared to HFrEF patients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-0.95; P < 0.001) and a significantly higher overall mortality rate (adjusted HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.17-1.33; P < 0.001) compared to HFpEF patients. This was similarly seen with cardiovascular mortality and HF hospitalisations, with the exception of similar HF hospitalisations between HFmrEF and HFpEF patients. CONCLUSION:HFmrEF patients account for a significant burden of patients with HF. HFmrEF represents a distinct HF phenotype with high atherosclerotic burden and clinical outcomes saddled in between those of HFrEF and HFpEF. Further therapeutic studies to guide management of this challenging group of patients are warranted.

Background:Understanding the trajectories of metabolic risk factors for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is necessary for healthcare policymaking. We estimated future projections of the incidence of metabolic diseases in a multi-ethnic population with AMI. Methods:The incidence and mortality contributed by metabolic risk factors in the population with AMI (diabetes mellitus [T2DM], hypertension, hyperlipidemia, overweight/obesity, active/previous smokers) were projected up to year 2050, using linear and Poisson regression models based on the Singapore Myocardial Infarction Registry from 2007 to 2018. Forecast analysis was stratified based on age, sex and ethnicity. Findings:From 2025 to 2050, the incidence of AMI is predicted to rise by 194.4% from 482 to 1418 per 100,000 population. The largest percentage increase in metabolic risk factors within the population with AMI is projected to be overweight/obesity (880.0% increase), followed by hypertension (248.7% increase), T2DM (215.7% increase), hyperlipidemia (205.0% increase), and active/previous smoking (164.8% increase). The number of AMI-related deaths is expected to increase by 294.7% in individuals with overweight/obesity, while mortality is predicted to decrease by 11.7% in hyperlipidemia, 29.9% in hypertension, 32.7% in T2DM and 49.6% in active/previous smokers, from 2025 to 2050. Compared with Chinese individuals, Indian and Malay individuals bear a disproportionate burden of overweight/obesity incidence and AMI-related mortality. Interpretation:The incidence of AMI is projected to continue rising in the coming decades. Overweight/obesity will emerge as fastest-growing metabolic risk factor and the leading risk factor for AMI-related mortality. Funding:This research was supported by the NUHS Seed Fund (NUHSRO/2022/058/RO5+6/Seed-Mar/03) and National Medical Research Council Research Training Fellowship (MOH-001131). The SMIR is a national, ministry-funded registry run by the National Registry of Diseases Office and funded by the Ministry of Health, Singapore.

BackgroundAcute myocardial infarction (AMI) cases have decreased in part due to the advent of targeted therapies for standard modifiable cardiovascular disease risk factors (SMuRF). Recent studies have reported that ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients without SMuRF (termed “SMuRF-less”) may be increasing in prevalence and have worse outcomes than “SMuRF-positive” patients. As these studies have been limited to STEMI and comprised mainly Caucasian cohorts, we investigated the changes in the prevalence and mortality of both SMuRF-less STEMI and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) patients in a multiethnic Asian population.MethodsWe evaluated 23,922 STEMI and 62,631 NSTEMI patients from a national multiethnic registry. Short-term cardiovascular and all-cause mortalities in SMuRF-less patients were compared to SMuRF-positive patients.ResultsThe proportions of SMuRF-less STEMI but not of NSTEMI have increased over the years. In hospitals, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and 1-year cardiovascular mortality were significantly higher in SMuRF-less STEMI after adjustment for age, creatinine, and hemoglobin. However, this difference did not remain after adjusting for anterior infarction, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and Killip class. There were no differences in mortality in SMuRF-less NSTEMI. In contrast to Chinese and Malay patients, SMuRF-less patients of South Asian descent had a two-fold higher risk of in-hospital all-cause mortality even after adjusting for features of increased disease severity.ConclusionSMuRF-less patients had an increased risk of mortality with STEMI, suggesting that there may be unidentified nonstandard risk factors predisposing SMuRF-less patients to a worse prognosis. This group of patients may benefit from more intensive secondary prevention strategies to improve clinical outcomes.

Risk stratification plays a key role in identifying acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients at higher risk of mortality. However, current AMI risk scores such as the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score were derived from predominantly Caucasian populations and may not be applicable to Asian populations. We previously developed an AMI risk score from the national-level Singapore Myocardial Infarction Registry (SMIR) confined to ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients and did not include non-STEMI (NSTEMI) patients. Here, we derived a modified SMIR risk score for both STEMI and NSTEMI patients and compared its performance to the GRACE 2.0 score for predicting 1-year all-cause mortality in our multi-ethnic population. The most significant predictor of 1-year all-cause mortality in our population using the GRACE 2.0 score was cardiopulmonary resuscitation on admission (adjusted hazards ratio [HR] 6.50), while the most significant predictor using the SMIR score was age 80–89 years (adjusted HR 7.78). Although the variables used in the GRACE 2.0 score and SMIR score were not exactly the same, the c-statistics for 1-year all-cause mortality were similar between the two scores (GRACE 2.0 0.841 and SMIR 0.865). In conclusion, we have shown that in a multi-ethnic Asian AMI population undergoing PCI, the SMIR score performed as well as the GRACE 2.0 score.

Background Stress-induced hyperglycaemia at time of hospital admission has been linked to worse prognosis following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In addition to glucose, other glucose-related indices, such as HbA1c, glucose-HbA1c ratio (GHR), and stress-hyperglycaemia ratio (SHR) are potential predictors of clinical outcomes following AMI. However, the optimal blood glucose, HbA1c, GHR, and SHR cut-off values for predicting adverse outcomes post-AMI are unknown. As such, we determined the optimal blood glucose, HbA1c, GHR, and SHR cut-off values for predicting 1-year all cause mortality in diabetic and non-diabetic ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients. Methods We undertook a national, registry-based study of patients with AMI from January 2008 to December 2015. We determined the optimal blood glucose, HbA1c, GHR, and SHR cut-off values using the Youden's formula for 1-year all-cause mortality. We subsequently analyzed the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the cut-off values in the diabetic and non-diabetic subgroups, stratified by the type of AMI. Results There were 5841 STEMI and 4105 NSTEMI in the study. In STEMI patients, glucose, GHR, and SHR were independent predictors of 1-year all-cause mortality [glucose: OR 2.19 (95% CI 1.74-2.76); GHR: OR 2.28 (95% CI 1.80-2.89); SHR: OR 2.20 (95% CI 1.73-2.79)]. However, in NSTEMI patients, glucose and HbA1c were independently associated with 1-year all-cause mortality [glucose: OR 1.38 (95% CI 1.01-1.90); HbA1c: OR 2.11 (95% CI 1.15-3.88)]. In diabetic STEMI patients, SHR performed the best in terms of area-under-the-curve (AUC) analysis (glucose: AUC 63.3%, 95% CI 59.5-67.2; GHR 68.8% 95% CI 64.8-72.8; SHR: AUC 69.3%, 95% CI 65.4-73.2). However, in non-diabetic STEMI patients, glucose, GHR, and SHR performed equally well (glucose: AUC 72.0%, 95% CI 67.7-76.3; GHR 71.9% 95% CI 67.7-76.2; SHR: AUC 71.7%, 95% CI 67.4-76.0). In NSTEMI patients, glucose performed better than HbA1c for both diabetic and non-diabetic patients in AUC analysis (For diabetic, glucose: AUC 52.8%, 95% CI 48.1-57.6; HbA1c: AUC 42.5%, 95% CI 37.6-47. For non-diabetic, glucose: AUC 62.0%, 95% CI 54.1-70.0; HbA1c: AUC 51.1%, 95% CI 43.3-58.9). The optimal cut-off values for glucose, GHR, and SHR in STEMI patients were 15.0 mmol/L, 2.11, and 1.68 for diabetic and 10.6 mmol/L, 1.72, and 1.51 for non-diabetic patients respectively. For NSTEMI patients, the optimal glucose values were 10.7 mmol/L for diabetic and 8.1 mmol/L for non-diabetic patients. Conclusions SHR was the most consistent independent predictor of 1-year all-cause mortality in both diabetic and non-diabetic STEMI, whereas glucose was the best predictor in NSTEMI patients.

Smoking is one of the leading risk factors for cardiovascular diseases, including ischemic heart disease and hypertension. However, in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients, smoking has been associated with better clinical outcomes, a phenomenon termed the “smoker’s paradox.” Given the known detrimental effects of smoking on the cardiovascular system, it has been proposed that the beneficial effect of smoking on outcomes is due to age differences between smokers and non-smokers and is therefore a smoker’s pseudoparadox. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between smoking status and clinical outcomes in ST-segment elevation (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), using a national multi-ethnic Asian registry. In unadjusted analyses, current smokers had better clinical outcomes following STEMI and NSTEMI. However, after adjusting for age, the protective effect of smoking was lost, confirming a smoker’s pseudoparadox. Interestingly, although current smokers had increased risk for recurrent MI within 1 year after PCI in both STEMI and NSTEMI patients, there was no increase in mortality. In summary, we confirm the existence of a smoker’s pseudoparadox in a multi-ethnic Asian cohort of STEMI and NSTEMI patients and report increased risk of recurrent MI, but not mortality, in smokers.

Lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) and triglyceride (TG) levels form the cornerstone approach of cardiovascular risk reduction, and a higher high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C) is thought to be protective. However, in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients, higher admission LDL-C and TG levels have been shown to be associated with better clinical outcomes - termed the 'lipid paradox'. We studied the relationship between lipid profile obtained within 72 hours of presentation, and all-cause mortality (during hospitalization, at 30-days and 12-months), and rehospitalization for heart failure and non-fatal AMI at 12-months in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We included 11543 STEMI and 8470 NSTEMI patients who underwent PCI in the Singapore Myocardial Infarction Registry between 2008-2015. NSTEMI patients were older (60.3 years vs 57.7 years, p < 0.001) and more likely to be female (22.4% vs 15.0%, p < 0.001). In NSTEMI, a lower LDL-C was paradoxically associated with worse outcomes for death during hospitalization, within 30-days and within 12-months (all p < 0.001), but adjustment eliminated this paradox. In contrast, the paradox for LDL-C persisted for all primary outcomes after adjustment in STEMI. For NSTEMI patients, a lower HDL-C was associated with a higher risk of death during hospitalization but in STEMI patients a lower HDL-C was paradoxically associated with a lower risk of death during hospitalization. For this endpoint, the interaction term for HDL-C and type of MI was significant even after adjustment. An elevated TG level was not protective after adjustment. These observations may be due to differing characteristics and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms in NSTEMI and STEMI.

Background and Aim: The benefit of early coronary angiography (CAG) and revascularization in resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is unclear. We evaluated the association between early CAG and clinical outcomes in these patients. Methods: Data on all resuscitated adult OHCA cases of cardiac etiology between 2011-2015 were extracted from the prospective Singapore Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study and linked with data from the national database of cardiac procedures. The 30-day survival and neurological outcomes (good outcome defined as Cerebral Performance Category [CPC] 1 or 2) were compared between patients undergoing early CAG (within 1-calender day) and patients not undergoing early CAG. Inverse probability weighted estimator was used to adjust for propensity to perform early CAG and PCI. Results: Of 976 consecutive patients who survived to admission (mean age 64±13, 73.7% males), 401 (41.1%) patients underwent CAG and obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) was present in 352 (87.8%), of whom 284 (70.8%) underwent revascularization. Patients who underwent early CAG (n=337[34.5%]) were significantly different compared to those who underwent delayed or no CAG (n=639[65.5%]) (Table 1). Early CAG and PCI patients had improved survival and better neurological outcomes (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.806 [95% CI 1.675 - 8.648] and AOR 3.075 [95% CI 1.119 - 8.451]), compared to those without. The odds of survival decreased with epinephrine administration (AOR 0.357 [95% CI 0.199 - 0.640]), but increased with an initial shockable rhythm (AOR 6.587 [95% CI 3.659 - 11.861]). The rates of bleeding (2% vs 0%, p=0.300) and stroke (1.6% vs 1.9%, p=0.880) were not increased with early intervention. Conclusion: Early CAG and PCI after OHCA were associated with improved clinical outcomes after OHCA without increasing complications. Further studies are required to identify the characteristics of patients who would benefit most from this invasive strategy.

Background: Risk scores predicting in-patient mortality in heart failure patients have not been designed specifically for Asian patients. We aimed to validate and recalibrate the OPTIMIZE-HF risk model for in-hospital mortality in a multiethnic Asian population hospitalized for heart failure. Methods and Results: Data from the Singapore Cardiac Databank Heart Failure on patients admitted for heart failure from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2013, were included. The primary outcome studied was in-hospital mortality. Two models were compared: the original OPTIMIZE-HF risk model and a modified OPTIMIZE-HF risk model (similar variables but with coefficients derived from our cohort). A total of 15,219 patients were included. The overall in-hospital mortality was 1.88% (n = 286). The original model had a C-statistic of 0.739 (95% CI 0.708-0.770) with a good match between predicted and observed mortality rates (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic 13.8; P = .086). The modified model had a C-statistic of 0.741 (95% CI 0.709-0.773) but a significant difference between predicted and observed mortality rates (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic 17.2; P = .029). The modified model tended to underestimate risk at the extremes (lowest and highest ends) of risk. Conclusions: We provide the first independent validation of the OPTIMIZE-HF risk score in an Asian population. This risk model has been shown to perform reliably in our Asian cohort and will potentially provide clinicians with a useful tool to identify high-risk heart failure patients for more intensive management.