There is increasing concern that thyroid hormone system–disrupting chemicals (THSDCs) may affect brain development during gestation and lactation. THSDCs comprise a wide range of natural and synthetic xenobiotics that activate diverse biological pathways. However, how disruption of specific molecular targets alters maternal thyroid hormone homeostasis and brain development in the offspring warrants further investigation. To address this question, this study investigates the effects of two THSDCs administered to pregnant rats from gestational day 6 through postnatal day 21: 5-propyl-2-thiouracil (PTU, 2.4 mg/kg/day), inhibitor of thyroid hormone synthesis, and pregnenolone-16α-carbonitrile (PCN, 300 mg/kg/day), inducer of hepatic enzymes involved in thyroid hormone metabolism. Circulating and brain thyroid hormone levels, enzymatic activities, and histopathology were assessed in dams and offspring. To further elucidate underlying mechanisms, multi-omics analyses combining proteomics, metabolomics, and spatial transcriptomics were performed on target organs including the thyroid gland, liver, and brain. Exposure to PTU resulted in severe thyroid hormone depletion in both serum and brain, accompanied by structural brain abnormalities, whereas PCN primarily induced hepatic enzyme activity with minimal effect on circulating thyroid hormone levels. Despite these distinct modes of action, multi-omics integration revealed convergent perturbations across molecular layers in the brain, particularly affecting energy metabolism and cytoskeletal organization with more pronounced effects observed following PTU exposure. Overall, multi-omics profiling enabled robust and highly sensitive identification of molecular signatures reflective of PCN exposure, without significant evidence of associated adverse toxicological effects. This approach highlights the value of multi-omics for mechanistic characterization and predictive assessment of THSDC-induced neurodevelopmental toxicity.

The last session of the 2025 Second Joint Congress of the British Society of Toxicological Pathology (BSTP) and the European Society of Toxicologic Pathology (ESTP) held in Manchester (United Kingdom) reviewed current recommendations and best practices for carcinogenicity risk assessment. The session comprised an introductory lecture about new approaches for screening for carcinogenicity, a joint session presenting a regulatory perspective about the Weight of Evidence (WoE) assessment for agrochemicals and pharmaceuticals, followed by another joint session elaborating on the industry experience about WoE. In addition, 3 case examples were presented to illustrate the challenges of in vivo carcinogenicity assessment in rodents within the current paradigm.

The second session of the 2nd Joint BSTP/ESTP Toxicologic Pathology Congress, Manchester, UK, September 23-26, 2025, entitled “New Approach Methodologies for Carcinogenicity Evaluation,” was dedicated to innovative strategies for assessing carcinogenic risks in various substances, particularly in drug development and agrochemicals. The two-year rodent cancer bioassay in two species (generally rats and mice) is currently the standard method for assessing the carcinogenic potential of agrochemicals for humans. However, this method has some weaknesses and is subject to ethical and scientific debate. Attempts to waive those studies have been proposed, but more relevant methods using less or preferably no animals are still being sought. The session featured five key presentations that explored cutting-edge methodologies aimed at improving the accuracy and reliability of carcinogenicity predictions. Below is a summary of each talk presented.

The thyroid gland, a vital component of the endocrine system, plays a pivotal role in regulating metabolic processes, growth, and development. To better characterize thyroid system disrupting chemicals (TSDC), we followed the next-generation risk assessment approach, which further considers the mechanistic profile of xenobiotics. We combined targeted in vitro testing with untargeted metabolomics. Four known TSDC, propyl-thiouracil (PTU), sodium perchlorate, triclosan, and 5-pregnen-3β-ol-20-one-16α‑carbonitrile (PCN) were investigated using rat in vitro models, including primary hepatocytes, PCCL3 cells, thyroid microsomes, and three-dimensional thyroid follicles. We confirmed each compound's mode of action, PTU inhibited thyroperoxidase activity and thyroid hormones secretion in thyroid cells model, sodium perchlorate induced a NIS-mediated iodide uptake decrease as triclosan to a lesser extent, and PCN activated expression and activity of hepatic enzymes (CYPs and UGTs) involved in thyroid hormones metabolism. In parallel, we characterized intracellular metabolites of interest. We identified disrupted basal metabolic pathways, but also metabolites directly linked to the compound's mode of action as tyrosine derivates for sodium perchlorate and triclosan, bile acids involved in beta-oxidation, and precursors of cytochrome P450 synthesis for PCN. This pilot study has provided metabolomic fingerprinting of dedicated TSDC exposures, which could be used to screen and differentiate specific modes of action.

In December 2021, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued the final guidance for industry titled Pathology Peer Review in Nonclinical Toxicology Studies: Questions and Answers. The stated purpose of the FDA guidance is to provide information to sponsors, applicants, and nonclinical laboratory personnel regarding the management and conduct of histopathology peer review as part of nonclinical toxicology studies conducted in compliance with good laboratory practice (GLP) regulations. On behalf of and in collaboration with global societies of toxicologic pathology and the Society of Quality Assurance, the Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee (SRPC) of the Society of Toxicologic Pathology (STP) initiated a review of this FDA guidance. The STP has previously published multiple papers related to the scientific conduct of a pathology peer review of nonclinical toxicology studies and appropriate documentation practices. The objectives of this review are to provide an in-depth analysis and summary interpretation of the FDA recommendations and share considerations for the conduct of pathology peer review in nonclinical toxicology studies that claim compliance to GLP regulations. In general, this working group is in agreement with the recommendations from the FDA guidance that has added clear expectations for pathology peer review preparation, conduct, and documentation.

A retrospective analysis in C57BL6/J mice used in dietary carcinogenicity studies was performed to determine the survival rate, causes of death and incidences of spontaneous non-tumoral and tumoral findings. Data were collected from 1600 mice from control dose groups of sixteen 18-month carcinogenicity assays performed between 2003 and 2021 at the same test facility with similar environmental conditions and experimental procedures. The survival rate was high in both sexes (81%-85%) and the causes of humane euthanasia or death were mainly non-tumoral (chronic ulcerative dermatitis, atrial thrombosis). Benign tumors were more frequent than malignant tumors and females were more affected than males. Pituitary gland adenoma in females, lymphoma, bronchioloalveolar adenoma, and harderian gland adenoma in both sexes were the most common tumors. Systemic amyloidosis, the most frequent non-tumoral lesion, was observed variably across studies without sex predilection. The analysis by cohort (3 time periods of 6 years) showed a tendency toward higher incidences of lymphoma and pituitary gland adenoma and lower incidences of amyloidosis over time. The results presented here provide for the first time a robust set of control historical data in untreated C57BL/6J mice kept for 18 months contributing to build in depth knowledge of this animal model.

Nonclinical toxicology studies that are required to support human clinical trials of new drug candidates are generally conducted in a rodent and a non-rodent species. These studies typically contain a vehicle control group and low, intermediate, and high dose test article groups. In addition, a dosing-free recovery phase is sometimes included to determine reversibility of potential toxicities observed during the dosing phase and may include additional animals in the vehicle control and one or more dose groups. Typically, reversibility is determined by comparing the test article-related changes in the dosing phase animals to concurrent recovery phase animals at the same dose level. Therefore, for interpretation of reversibility, it is not always essential to euthanize the recovery vehicle control animals. In the absence of recovery vehicle control tissues, the pathologist's experience, historical control database, digital or glass slide repositories, or literature can be used to interpret the findings in the context of background pathology of the species/strain/age. Therefore, in most studies, the default approach could be not to euthanize recovery vehicle control animals. This article provides opinions on scenarios that may or may not necessitate euthanasia of recovery phase vehicle control animals in nonclinical toxicology studies involving dogs and nonhuman primates.

Many pharmaceutical companies have recently elected to stop maintaining good laboratory practices (GLP) status of their R&D sites. Similar discussions have also been engaged in the (agro)chemical industry. This opinion paper examines the pros and cons of maintaining facility GLP status for the purposes of performing the pathology interpretation or peer reviews of GLP studies internally. The toxicologic pathologist provides gross and histomorphologic evaluation and interpretation of nonclinical exploratory and regulatory studies during drug and (agro)chemical development. This assessment significantly contributes to human risk assessment by characterizing the toxicological profile and discussing the human relevance of the findings. The toxicologic pathologist is a key contributor to compound development decisions (advancement or termination) and in the development of de-risking strategies for backup compounds, thus playing a critical role in helping to reduce the late attrition of drugs and chemicals. Maintaining GLP compliance is often perceived as a costly and cumbersome process; a common and short-term strategy to reduce the costs is to outsource regulatory toxicity studies. However, there are significant advantages in maintaining the GLP status for toxicologic pathology activities in-house including the sustainable retention of internal pathology expertise that has maintained the necessary training needed to manage GLP studies. [Box: see text].

Digital pathology evolved rapidly, enabling more systematic usage of image analysis and development of artificial intelligence (AI) applications. Here, combined AI models were developed to evaluate hepatocellular hypertrophy in rat liver, using commercial AI-based software on hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole slide images. In a first approach, deep learning-based identification of critical tissue zones (centrilobular, midzonal, and periportal) enabled evaluation of region-specific cell size. Mean cytoplasmic area of hepatocytes was calculated via several sequential algorithms including segmentation in microanatomical structures (separation of sinusoids and vessels from hepatocytes), nuclear detection, and area measurements. An increase in mean cytoplasmic area could be shown in groups given phenobarbital, known to induce hepatocellular hypertrophy when compared to control groups, in multiple studies. Quantitative results correlated with the gold standard: observation and grading performed by board-certified veterinary pathologists, liver weights, and gene expression. Furthermore, as a second approach, we introduce for the first time deep learning-based direct detection of hepatocellular hypertrophy with similar results. Cell hypertrophy is challenging to pick up, particularly in milder cases. Additional evaluation of mean cytoplasmic area or direct detection of hypertrophy, combined with histopathological observations and liver weights, is expected to increase accuracy and repeatability of diagnoses and grading by pathologists.

Chemical substances are subjected to assessment of genotoxic and carcinogenic effects before being marketed to protect man and the environment from health risks. For agrochemicals, the long-term rodent carcinogenicity study is currently required from a regulatory perspective. Although it is the current mainstay for the detection of nongenotoxic carcinogens, carcinogenicity studies are shown to have prominent weaknesses and are subject to ethical and scientific debate. A transition toward a mechanism-based weight-of-evidence approach is considered a requirement to enhance the prediction of carcinogenic potential for environmental (agro)chemicals. The resulting approach should make optimal use of innovative (computational) tools and be less animal demanding. To identify the various mode of actions (MOAs) underlying the nongenotoxic carcinogenic potential of agrochemicals, we conducted an extensive analysis of 411 unique agrochemicals that have been evaluated for carcinogenicity by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). About one-third of these substances could be categorized as nongenotoxic carcinogens with an average of approximately two tumor types per substance, observed in a variety of organs. For two-third of the tumor cases, an underlying MOA (network) could be identified. This analysis demonstrates that a limited set of MOA (networks) is underlying nongenotoxic carcinogenicity of agrochemicals, illustrating that the transition toward a MOA-driven approach appears manageable. Ultimately the approach should cover relevant MOAs and its associated key events; this will also facilitate the evaluation of the human relevance. This manuscript describes the results of the analysis while identifying knowledge gaps and necessities to achieve a mechanism-based weight-of-evidence approach.

Currently the only methods for non-genotoxic carcinogenic hazard assessment accepted by most regulatory authorities are lifetime carcinogenicity studies. However, these involve the use of large numbers of animals and the relevance of their predictive power and results has been scientifically challenged. With increased availability of innovative test methods and enhanced understanding of carcinogenic processes, it is believed that tumour formation can now be better predicted using mechanistic information. A workshop organised by the European Partnership on Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing brought together experts to discuss an alternative, mechanism-based approach for cancer risk assessment of agrochemicals. Data from a toolbox of test methods for detecting modes of action (MOAs) underlying non-genotoxic carcinogenicity are combined with information from subchronic toxicity studies in a weight-of-evidence approach to identify carcinogenic potential of a test substance. The workshop included interactive sessions to discuss the approach using case studies. These showed that fine-tuning is needed, to build confidence in the proposed approach, to ensure scientific correctness, and to address different regulatory needs. This novel approach was considered realistic, and its regulatory acceptance and implementation can be facilitated in the coming years through continued dialogue between all stakeholders and building confidence in alternative approaches.

Endocrine disrupting chemicals raise a lot of interest and concern regarding their risk for human health and the environment. They represent a broad variety of natural and synthetic chemicals with different levels of endocrine activity evaluation. In particular, for high production volume chemicals, new methods are required to enable the evaluation of the vast number of chemicals for their potential to alter the endocrine system and prioritize them for deeper characterization. The ToxCast program from the US EPA provides data from high throughput screening assays to develop computational tools aimed at rapid in vitro bioactivity screening and prioritization.Using publicly available data (ToxCast and ToxRef databases), we evaluate whether in vitro assay evaluations could predict in vivo outcomes observed in rat long-term studies for more than 400 chemicals. We focus on effects observed in three endocrine and two sex accessory organs and 42 in vitro assays related to pathways associated with endocrine related toxicity.First, using simple statistical correlation we demonstrate that there is no mutual linear correlation between the selected in vitro assays and any in vivo outcome, with balanced accuracies around 50% for each assay-outcome pair. Then, by applying machine learning to investigate potential non-linear correlations, we show that the combination of different in vitro assays is not correlated with the long-term in vivo effects and cannot help to predict them since balanced accuracies are also around 50%. Moreover, the prediction based on in vitro assays is not better than the one based on classical QSAR methods. This study highlights that the selected in vitro assays do not provide information about in vivo outcomes observed in endocrine and associated organs in long-term rat in vivo studies and stresses the need for the development of in vitro assays that reflect the compounds’ pharmacokinetic properties.

The INHAND (International Harmonization of Nomenclature and Diagnostic Criteria for Lesions in Rats and Mice) Project (www.toxpath.org/inhand.asp) is a joint initiative among the Societies of Toxicological Pathology from Europe (ESTP), Great Britain (BSTP), Japan (JSTP) and North America (STP) to develop an internationally accepted nomenclature for proliferative and nonproliferative lesions in laboratory animals. The purpose of this publication is to provide a standardized nomenclature for classifying microscopic lesions observed in the endocrine organs (pituitary gland, pineal gland, thyroid gland, parathyroid glands, adrenal glands and pancreatic islets) of laboratory rats and mice, with color photomicrographs illustrating examples of the lesions. The standardized nomenclature presented in this document is also available electronically on the internet (http://www.goreni.org/). Sources of material included histopathology databases from government, academia, and industrial laboratories throughout the world. Content includes spontaneous and aging lesions as well as lesions induced by exposure to test materials. A widely accepted and utilized international harmonization of nomenclature for endocrine lesions in laboratory animals will decrease confusion among regulatory and scientific research organizations in different countries and provide a common language to increase and enrich international exchanges of information among toxicologists and pathologists.

Electronic images of histopathological changes are commonly and increasingly used in toxicologic pathology for morphological evaluation, illustration, peer review, or reporting. Toxicity studies in which cell proliferation is an end point are also pivotal in determining the carcinogenic potential of new molecules. In this article, we describe the approach of the European Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis working group (CEPA) for performing cell proliferation studies and morphometry using electronic images. The Society of Toxicologic Pathology (STP) has published a position statement on handling of pathology image data in compliance with 21 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 58 and 11. CEPA supports the STP position and shares the issues involved in the use of electronic images in pathology. However, considering the experience and current know-how of members, particularly in conducting cell proliferation studies, CEPA would like to recommend in this article that electronic images acquired using state-of-the-art slide imaging techniques, including whole slide scanning, need not be considered as raw data, and therefore are not subject to 21 CFR Parts 58 and 11 regulations for archiving. In this article, we detail the reasons why we come to this proposal and we describe the measures that are taken to ensure Good Laboratory Practice-compliant execution of cell proliferation studies that include acquisition and validation of imaging and image analysis systems, development and validation of methods for their intended use, formulation, and use of standard operating procedures.

Repeated exposure to 17-α-methyltestosterone (17MT) and estradiol benzoate (EB) for 28 or 90 days in rats induce similar ovarian atrophy. The objective of the present work was to identify and compare the early effects induced by 17MT and EB on the ovary using molecular and histopathological tools. Female rats were evaluated after 1, 3 or 7 days following an oral exposure by gavage at a daily dose of 600 mg/kg/day for 17MT and 5 mg/kg/day for EB. All animals were found to be acyclic after 3 or 7 days of treatment with 17MT and EB. Histopathological changes were present in the ovary, uterus, vagina and mammary gland after both treatments. Ovarian atrophy known as the long term effect of 17MT and EB was not yet detected after 7 days of treatment. But non regressive corpora lutea and cystic follicles were identically observed in the ovary of 17MT and EB treated females. Both compounds induced a decrease of LH transcripts together with an increase of plasma progesterone and prolactin levels. Differences in the profile of regulation of the aromatase were noted after 1 and 3 days of treatment in 17MT treated animals (upregulated) when compared to EB treated animals (downregulated). In summary, we have shown that despite the different nature of hormonal activity, EB and 17MT induce very early endocrine perturbation which presents several similarities. Our work indicated that the detection of early key hormonal markers in short term studies can help to predict the adverse long term effects on target tissues.

1,3-Dinitrobenzene (DNB) causes testicular injury, particularly to Sertoli cells, and induces apoptosis in the surrounding germinal cells in rodents; however, the mechanisms causing this toxicity are poorly understood. Our studies, using standard and molecular tools, were conducted to better understand the pathogenesis of the testicular effects. Four daily oral doses of 0.1-8 mg/kg/day caused marked testicular lesions in rats from 4 mg/kg/day. Global transcriptomics revealed cell cycle and cell death as the major biological processes affected with the expression of genes associated with cell cycle progression ("mitotic roles of polo-like kinase") being particularly altered. In a single dose time course study (4 mg/kg), no adverse changes were recorded; however, in contrast to the data from the multiple dose study, plasma testosterone and testicular steroidogenesis-related gene expression were affected. These steroid hormone effects were confirmed in vitro using the H295R steroidogenesis assay. With this global approach we show that DNB not only induces apoptosis and interferes with cell cycle in the testes but that DNB can also modulate steroid hormone biosynthesis, suggesting an interference with the endocrine system. However, the contribution of the endocrine changes to the severe testicular lesions is presently unknown and requires further investigation. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

The safety assessment of chemicals for humans relies on identifying no-observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs) in animal toxicity studies using standard methods. With the advent of high information content technologies, especially microarrays, it is pertinent to determine the impact of molecular data on the NOAELs. Consequently, we conducted an integrative study to identify a no-transcriptomic effect dose using microarray analyses coupled with quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-qPCR) and determined how this correlated with the NOAEL. We assessed the testicular effects of the antiandrogen, flutamide (FM), in a rat 28-day toxicity study using doses of 0.2-30 mg/kg/day. Plasma testosterone levels and testicular histopathology indicated a NOAEL of 1 mg/kg/day. A no-effect dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day was established based on molecular data relevant to the phenotypic changes. We observed differential gene expression starting from 1 mg/kg/day and a deregulation of more than 1500 genes at 30 mg/kg/day. Dose-related changes were identified for the major pathways (e.g., fatty acid metabolism) associated with the testicular lesion (Leydig cell hyperplasia) that were confirmed by RT-qPCR. These data, along with protein accumulation profiles and FM metabolite concentrations in testis, supported the no-effect dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day. Furthermore, the microarray data indicated a dose-dependent change in the fatty acid catabolism pathway, a biological process described for the first time to be affected by FM in testicular tissue. In conclusion, the present data indicate the existence of a transcriptomic threshold, which must be exceeded to progress from a normal state to an adaptative state and subsequently to adverse toxicity.