BACKGROUND:Sepsis may lead to the suppression of stimulated cytokine release after Gram-negative stimuli, correlating with a fatal outcome. Treatment of sepsis includes adequate therapy with antibiotics. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of antibiotics in the modulation of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated cytokine response of human monocytes.METHODS:In this ex vivo, in vitro study, whole blood samples were taken from 10 healthy volunteers, stimulated with LPS in the presence or absence of various antibiotics (penicillin, amoxicillin, cefuroxime, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem/cilastatin, gentamicin, netilmicin, ciprofloxacin, vancomycin) and cultured for 24 h. Thereafter, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-10 (IL-10) were measured in the supernatants by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Furthermore, CD14 and HLA-DR expression on monocytes was assessed using flow cytometry.RESULTS:All cephalosporins decreased LPS-stimulated IL-10 release. Cefuroxime and cefotaxime also decreased the expression density of the LPS recognition molecule CD14 on monocytes. An increase in LPS-stimulated IL-10 release was observed with vancomycin. A suppression of LPS-stimulated TNF-alpha and IL-10 release was observed in the presence of ciprofloxacin.CONCLUSION:These results indicate a modulation of the expression density of CD14 on monocytes, together with a shift from a balanced to an inflammatory cytokine release pattern, by cefuroxime and cefotaxime. Vancomycin changes the response to an anti-inflammatory release pattern. After ciprofloxacin, a profound unresponsiveness of immune-competent cells to LPS stimulation is observed. Because of the critical role of a balanced innate immune response, these data may be of importance for the selection of antibiotics in septic patients.

BACKGROUND:Bispectral Index (BIS)-titrated administration allows a reduction of propofol infusion rates in patients undergoing surgery. Resulting differences in anesthetic depth might affect the stress response to surgery involving neural circuitry not reflected in the electroencephalogram.METHODS:Forty patients scheduled to undergo elective coronary artery bypass grafting receiving a background infusion of remifentanil (0.3 microg . kg . min) were anesthetized with intravenous propofol delivered by target-controlled infusion according to the Marsh pharmacokinetic model under BIS monitoring. In a randomized, prospective design, 20 patients received propofol at a target concentration of 3 microg/ml, whereas in 20 patients propofol was titrated to maintain a BIS value of 40-50. Plasma concentrations of propofol (by means of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry), epinephrine, norepinephrine (by means of high-pressure liquid chromatography), cortisol (by means of radioimmunoassay), and interleukins 6 and 10 (by means of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) were measured repeatedly throughout surgery.RESULTS:BIS monitoring allowed a 30% reduction of propofol infusion rates and a similar decrease in plasma propofol concentrations in the BIS group without affecting the stress response to surgery for the group mean. None of the patients reported awareness during a standardized interview. Interestingly, propofol-remifentanil anesthesia blunted the release of epinephrine and cortisol to bypass surgery completely even when the propofol infusion rate was reduced according to BIS values.CONCLUSIONS:Total intravenous anesthesia using propofol-remifentanil effectively attenuates the neurohumoral stress response to coronary bypass surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass. Titration of propofol using BIS allows for significant reduction of propofol consumption, with only minor effects on stress response under these conditions.

Rensing, H; Hoff, G; Buchiner, H; Bauer, I; Stockhausen, A; Raddatz, A.; Bauer, M Author Information

Aim. Anesthetic agents have direct and indirect effects on immunocompetent cells but the molecular mechanisms of direct interactions are largely unknown. Therefore, the effect of propofol and ketamine on TNF-α gene expression was studied in cultured blood from healthy volunteers. Methods. TNF-α was measured in blood cultured in the absence or presence of propofol or ketamine after stimulation with E. coli endotoxin. TNF-α concentrations were correlated with the expression of TNF-α mRNA in mononuclear cells. The half-life of TNF-α mRNA was assessed after addition of actinomycin D, an inhibitor of DNA-directed RNA synthesis. Results. Propofol increased TNF-α mRNA (+42%) and protein (+44%) response while the addition of ketamine attenuated the TNF-a mRNA (−31%) and protein (−53%) response. The half-life of TNF-α mRNA was unaffected by the anesthetics. Conclusion. These data suggest that propofol and ketamine have opposite effects on transcription of the TNF-α gene. While the effects of propofol were observed with concentrations corresponding to an induction bolus, the effects of ketamine were restricted to higher concentrations.

BACKGROUND:Various anesthetics have been suggested to interfere with the immune system. The ability of leukocytes to express surface receptors and mediators is fundamental to a successful host defense. Therefore, the effects of intravenous anesthetics on cytokine release by leukocytes and expression of surface molecules known to modulate this response were determined.METHODS:Concentration-dependent effects of thiopentone, etomidate, propofol, ketamine, midazolam, and fentanyl on spontaneous and endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide; 1 microg/ml)-stimulated cytokine release were studied in whole blood from volunteers (n = 6) cultured for 25 h. In addition, expression of the lipopolysaccharide-recognition molecule CD14 and the major histocompatibility complex class II molecule human leukocyte locus A system-DR (HLA-DR) on monocytes were assessed using flow cytometry.RESULTS:All anesthetics studied elicited only minor effects on spontaneous cytokine release even at pharmacologic concentrations. However, expression density of CD14 was reduced in the presence of thiopentone, etomidate, and propofol, whereas HLA-DR was unaffected. Lipopolysaccharide-stimulated tumor necrosis factor response was inhibited by thiopentone (12.8% [median]; 7.6-18.8 [25-75 percentile]) of control, and ketamine (46.4% [median]; 44.4-56.4 [25-75 percentile]), at pharmacologic concentrations, whereas it was augmented even in the presence of low concentrations of propofol (172.3% [median]; 120.5-200.7 [25-75 percentile]). Ketamine additionally decreased the concentration of interleukin (IL)-1beta (14.8% [median]; 12.0-18.0 [25-75 percentile]). Release of IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) was inhibited by thiopentone, etomidate, and propofol, whereas the same anesthetics increased IL-10 concentration simultaneously. Midazolam and fentanyl did not alter the concentrations of any cytokine.CONCLUSIONS:These results suggest a complex modulation of the cytokine response by the studied anesthetics in cultured whole blood. Although effects on spontaneous cytokine release by leukocytes were negligible, some anesthetics affected their ability to respond to lipopolysaccharide.