STUDY DESIGN:Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS) cohort: prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter. OBJECTIVE:To analyze the distribution of GAP scores in the MEANS cohort and compare the spinal shape via stratification by GAP alignment category, age, and country. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:The GAP score has been used to categorize spinal morphology and prognosticate adult spinal deformity surgical outcomes and mechanical complications. We analyzed a large, multiethnic, asymptomatic cohort to assess the distribution of GAP scores. METHODS:Four hundred sixty-seven healthy volunteers without spinal disorders were recruited in five countries. Sagittal radiographic parameters were measured via the EOS imaging system. The GAP total and constituent factor scores were calculated for each patient. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was performed to compare variables across groups, followed by the post hoc Games-Howell test. Fisher exact test was used to compare categorical variables. The significance level was set to P <0.05. RESULTS:In the MEANS cohort, 13.7% (64/467) of volunteers were ≥60 years old, and 86.3% (403/467) were <60 years old. 76.9% (359/467) was proportioned, 19.5% (91/467) was moderately disproportioned, and 3.6% (17/467) was severely disproportioned. There was no significant difference in the frequency of proportioned, moderately, or severely disproportioned GAP between subjects from different countries ( P =0.060). Those with severely disproportioned GAP alignment were on average 14.5 years older ( P =0.016), had 23.1° lower magnitude lumbar lordosis (LL) ( P <0.001), 14.2° higher pelvic tilt ( P <0.001), 13.3° lower sacral slope ( P <0.001), and 24.1° higher pelvic-incidence (PI)-LL mismatch ( P <0.001), 18.2° higher global tilt ( P <0.001) than those with proportioned GAP; thoracic kyphosis and PI were not significantly different ( P >0.05). CONCLUSIONS:The GAP system applies to a large, multiethnic, asymptomatic cohort. Spinal alignment should be considered on a spectrum, as 19.5% of the asymptomatic volunteers were classified as moderately disproportioned and 3.6% severely disproportioned. Radiographic malalignment does not always indicate symptoms or pathology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:3.

Assess normative values of sagittal spinal and lower extremity alignment in asymptomatic volunteers of three difference races. Asymptomatic volunteers between the ages of 18–80 years were enrolled prospectively and then analyzed retrospectively from six different centers. Volunteers included reported no significant neck or back pain, nor any known spinal disorder(s). All volunteers underwent a standing full-body or full-spine low dose stereoradiograph. Volunteers were grouped into three main races; Asian (A), Arabo-Bèrbère (B), and Caucasian (C). The Asian volunteers included in this study were from Japan and Singapore. There were statistical differences in the Age, ODI, and BMI of the volunteers from the three different races. Asian volunteers had the lowest age (A: 36.7, B: 45.5, C: 42.0) and BMI (A: 22.1, B: 27.1, C: 27.3). Pelvic morphology including pelvic incidence (A: 51.0, B: 52.0, C: 52.5, p = 0.37), pelvic tilt (A: 11.9, B: 12.3, C: 12.9, p = 0.44), and sacral slope (A: 39.1, B: 39.7, C: 39.6, p = 0.77) were similar amongst the 3 races. Regional spinal alignment was different between the groups. Thoracic Kyphosis (A: 32.9, B: 43.3, C: 40.0, p < 0.0001) and Lumbar lordosis (A: − 54.2, B: − 60.4, C: − 59.6, p < 0.0001) were lower in Asians compared to Caucasian and Arabo-Bèrbère volunteers despite having similar pelvic incidence. Volunteers in the Asian group had lower lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis when compared to the Arabo-Bèrbère and Caucasian groups while all groups had similar pelvic morphology. Thoracic Kyphosis had no correlation with Pelvic Incidence, while Lumbar Lordosis correlated well with both Thoracic Kyphosis and Pelvic Incidence. Thoracic kyphosis may be an independent variable in establishing adequate lumbar lordosis and varies based on an individual’s race.

STUDY DESIGN:Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES:To show population variance in the Inflection Point (IP) and its role in defining maximum Thoracic Kyphosis (TK) and Lumbar Lordosis (LL). METHODS:468 asymptomatic adult volunteers were included in the Multi-Ethnic Normative Alignment Study (MEANS). To find parameters correlating with IP, the vertebrae and discs were numbered such that C7 was 0, T1 was 1, with T1-T2 disc being 1.5, etc. Statistical analysis was performed by a correlation matrix for IP and the 9 other selected parameters along with linear regressions. RESULTS:The overall mean IP was 12.44 approximately corresponding to T12-L1 disc with the median being 12.50, range was T8-L4. The cohort was then stratified by sex and ethnicity, but there was no significant difference in IP between groups. IP in younger subjects was 13 (L1), compared to 12.5 (T12-L1 disc) in older subjects (P < .05). IP was moderately correlated with the TK apex (r = .66). No strong correlation was found between IP and LL magnitude or apex, TK magnitude, sacral slope, or Pelvic Incidence (PI). In terms of other sagittal parameters, PI and LL demonstrated a significant positive correlation. PI and TK did not have a strong association. CONCLUSIONS:The mean IP was at the T12-L1 disc, however IP ranged from T8 to L4. Older subjects tended to have a relatively more cephalad IP. No radiographic variable was found to be a strong predictor of the IP. TK apex was found to have a moderate correlation.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT:Current definition of lumbar lordosis uses the L1-S1 angle. Prevailing classification of sagittal spinal morphology, derived from a young adult population, classifies the spine into four subtypes defined by their sacral slope (SS) and curve morphology. PURPOSE:To describe physiological sagittal alignment of the lumbar spine across age groups using three main parameters that dictate the lumbar curve: angular magnitude, span, and apex. STUDY DESIGN:A large, multicenter, cross-sectional radiographic comparison study. PATIENT SAMPLE:Four hundred sixty-eight healthy, asymptomatic subjects aged 18 to 80 years from five countries (184 males, 284 females; 98 France, 119 Japan, 79 Singapore, 80 Tunisia, 92 USA, mean age 40.61±14.99 years). OUTCOME MEASURES:Sagittal lumbar profile subtypes clustered based on lumbar curve angular magnitude (ie, Cobb angle of the lumbar lordosis), span, and apex, and described by sagittal radiographic parameters. METHODS:Subjects underwent whole-body low-dose EOS stereoradiographs. Comparisons between conventional L1-S1 lumbar lordosis (cLL) and true lumbar lordosis (tLL, defined by the inflection-S1 angle) were conducted. Using the K-means clustering algorithm, lumbar curve angular magnitude, span and apex were used to classify sagittal spinal morphology into subtypes, stratified across age groups. Further univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to compare radiographic parameters across subtypes, and identify predictors for the lumbar curve's angular magnitude, span and apex. RESULTS:Mean cLL was -57.27±11.37°, and tLL was -62.62±10.76°. Using tLL, instead of cLL, to describe sagittal spinal morphology, we found significant differences in terms of angular magnitude of the lumbar curve, the median thoracolumbar inflection vertebral level and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch Multivariate analysis found a larger SS, more positive T9 tilt, and more kyphotic T4-T12 predictive for a more lordotic tLL, while a larger overhang distance predicted for a less lordotic tLL (p-values<.001). In addition, a larger T9 tilt, less lordotic L1-L5 and smaller PT were predictors of a more caudal thoracolumbar inflection and lumbar apical vertebral levels (p-values<.001). Sagittal lumbar profiles of subjects age<30 years, 30≤age<60 years and age≥60 years, could be classified into 4, 6, and 3 subtypes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Sagittal lumbar profile subtypes vary across age groups, with more homogenous morphologies at the extremes of ages. Improved understanding of the morphological evolution of sagittal spinal profiles with age in asymptomatic individuals will help guide future individualized surgical treatment.

Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objectives To compare outcomes of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) to open posterior stabilization (OPS) in spinal instability patients and minimal access separation surgery (MASS) to open posterior stabilization and decompression (OPSD) in metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) patients. Methods We analysed patients who underwent surgery for thoracolumbar metastatic spine disease (MSD) from Jan 2011 to Oct 2017. Patients were divided into minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) and open spine surgery (OSS) groups. Spinal instability patients were treated with PPSF/OPS with pedicle screws. MSCC patients were treated with MASS/OPSD. Outcomes measured included intraoperative blood loss, operative time, duration of hospital stay and ASIA-score improvement. Time to initiate radiotherapy and perioperative surgical/non-surgical complications was recorded. Propensity scoring adjustment analysis was utilised to address heterogenicity of histological tumour subtypes. Results Of 200 eligible patients, 61 underwent MISS and 139 underwent OSS for MSD. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between MISS and OSS groups. In the MISS group, 28 (45.9%) patients were treated for spinal instability and 33 (54.1%) patients were treated for MSCC. In the OSS group, 15 (10.8%) patients were treated for spinal instability alone and 124 (89.2%) were treated for MSCC. Patients who underwent PPSF had significantly lower blood loss (95 mL vs 564 mL; P < .001) and surgical complication rates(P < .05) with shorter length of stay approaching significance (6 vs 19 days; P = .100) when compared to the OPS group. Patients who underwent MASS had significantly lower blood loss (602 mL vs 1008 mL) and shorter length of stay (10 vs 18 days; P = .098) vs the OPSD group. Conclusion This study demonstrates the benefits of PPSF and MASS over OPS and OPSD for the treatment of MSD with spinal instability and MSCC, respectively.

Purpose To radiographically compare lateral entry point S2-alar-iliac (L-S2AI) screw with conventional S2AI (C-S2AI) and conventional iliac screw (CIS) lengths and trajectories. Methods Twenty-five preoperative CT scans of consecutive patients undergoing adult spinal deformity realignment surgery over a random 2-year period were analysed. Maximum in-bone length, caudal and lateral trajectories of CIS, C-S2AI, and L-S2AI screws were measured and compared using One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc tests. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of high screw length discrepancy between C-S2AI and L-S2AI. Results Potential screw length was longest for CIS, followed by L-S2AI, then C-S2AI (114.5 ± 8.3 mm vs 101.4 ± 9.6 mm vs 80.6 ± 5.9 mm, respectively) in all patients ( p < 0.001). Actual screw lengths found both CIS and L-S2AI to be longer than C-S2AI (95.3 ± 8.5 mm and 93.4 ± 7.5 mm vs 82.1 ± 7.3 mm; p = 0.008 and 0.003). Potential lateral angulation was smallest for CIS, followed by L-S2AI, then C-S2AI (21.9 ± 7.0° vs 31.9 ± 7.1° vs 40.9 ± 6.7°, respectively) in all patients ( p < 0.001). L-S2AI and C-S2AI had the same caudal angulation (24.9 ± 6.8°), which was smaller than CIS (30.8 ± 5.8°) in all patients ( p < 0.001). Univariate, but not multivariate analysis, revealed that lumbar lordosis > 40° (OR 7.2, p = 0.041), diagnosis of degenerative spondylolisthesis (OR 10.5, p = 0.017), and > 7 instrumented levels (OR 2.6, p = 0.049) were significantly associated with high screw discrepancies. Conclusion The L-S2AI screw combines advantages of CIS and C-S2AI screws, which includes increased screw length, reduced lateral angulation, a low-profile screw head, ease of connection to proximal hardware, and the biomechanical advantage of a quadcortical purchase.

Study Design. Multicenter Cohort. Objective. Assess normative values of sagittal spinal and lower extremity alignment in asymptomatic volunteers stratified by age and gender. Summary of Background Data. Our understanding of ideal sagittal alignment is still evolving. The Multiethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS) investigated skeletal alignment of the largest multiethnic cohort of asymptomatic adult volunteers. We aim to assess normative values of sagittal spinal and lower extremity alignment in asymptomatic volunteers stratified by age and gender. Materials and Methods. Asymptomatic volunteers between the ages of 18–80 years were enrolled prospectively and then analyzed retrospectively from six different centers. Volunteers included reported no significant neck or back pain, nor any known spinal disorder(s). All volunteers underwent a standing full-body or full-spine low-dose stereoradiograph. Results. MEANS consisted of 468 volunteers with a mean age of 40.4±14.8 years. Thoracic kyphosis (TK) from T4 to T12 showed a mean of 37.4±10.9°. The average L1–S1 lumbar lordosis (LL) was −57.4±11.3°. LL did not show significant differences across the five age groups. TK showed a significant difference based on age (P<0.0001). Sagittal vertical axis increased across age groups from −14.2 mm in young adults to 17.0 mm in patients >64. Similar trend was seen for T1 pelvic angle with a mean of 5.0° in young adults and 13.7° in those older than age 64. Knee flexion increased across age groups without a significant change in odontoid-knee distance which is a surrogate for the center of the head aligned over the knees. Conclusions. In asymptomatic volunteers, sagittal alignment parameters showed a slow and steady change across age groups exemplified by an increase in TK. However, LL did not show a significant decrease across age groups. Volunteers used compensatory mechanisms such as slight pelvis retroversion, knee flexion, and neck extension to maintain an aligned sagittal posture with their head centered over their knees (odontoid-knee). Level of Evidence. 3

STUDY DESIGN:This is a cross-sectional cohort.OBJECTIVE:The aim was to describe sagittal plane alignment and balance in a multinational cohort of nondegenerated, asymptomatic adults.SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:Current sagittal alignment targets were developed using correlations between radiographic and quality-of-life measures in spinal deformity patients, rather than disease-free samples leading to relatively poor accounting for variance within a population.MATERIALS AND METHODS:Sagittal balance was defined using vertebral body tilt and spinopelvic alignment was defined as the vertebral pelvic angles from C2 to L5 (vertebral pelvic angle=vertebral tilt+pelvic tilt). Associations with pelvic incidence (PI) were assessed using linear regression. Multivariable linear regression was used to estimate a normal L1-S1 lordosis, adjusting for PI and the L1 pelvic angle (L1PA). Correlation between the L1 and T4 pelvic angles was assessed to define a normal thoracic alignment conditioned on lumbar alignment.RESULTS:Among 320 volunteers from 4 continents, median age was 37% and 60% were female. C2 tilt was independent of PI with minimal variation. PI was inadequate for estimating a normal lumbar lordosis (L1-S1, r2 =0.3), but was strongly associated with the lumbar pelvic angles (L1PA, r2 =0.58). Defining lumbar lordosis as a function of PI and L1PA resulted in high explained variance ( R2 =0.74) and the T4 pelvic angle had near perfect correlation with the L1PA ( r =0.9).CONCLUSIONS:We defined normal sagittal balance and spinopelvic alignment in a disease-free international volunteer cohort. Four parameters are either fixed or directly modifiable in surgery and can define a normal thoracic and lumbar alignment: the L1-S1 lordosis defined as a function of PI and the L1PA; and the T4 pelvic angle is nearly equivalent to the L1PA, aligning the T4-L1-hip axis.

STUDY DESIGN:A radiographic comparative study. OBJECTIVE:To investigate the influence of radiographic lower limb-spinal length proportion on sagittal radiographic parameters. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:Although lordotic realignment of the lumbar spine is a well-established surgical strategy, its ideal target has not been fully understood. The widely used pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis discrepancy (PI-LL) method to guide lordotic restoration of the lumber spine in the standing posture, may be further refined using the novel, radiographic lower limb-spinal length proportion parameter in selected subjects. METHODS:A 100 healthy subjects were imaged in the standing posture using EOS imaging to obtain whole-body lateral radiographs for the measurement of sagittal radiographic parameters. Univariate analyses were performed to compare radiographic parameters between groups with different radiographic lower limb-spinal length proportion. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify the associations between lower limb-spinal length proportions and other radiographic parameters. RESULTS:Regardless of lower limb-spinal length proportion (mean = 1.4), global lumbar angle (GLA) differed from spinal lordosis (SL), with the absolute means of SL and GLA larger and smaller than pelvic incidence (PI) respectively. Univariate analysis showed that patients with proportionately larger lower limb-spinal length proportion are more likely to have larger mean T1-slope, global thoracic angle (GTA), spinal kyphosis (SK), GLA, and SL. Multivariate analysis showed that a larger lower limb length-spinal length proportion is predictive of larger GLA is less than -47.69° (Odds Ratio (OR) 2.660, P = 0.026), and larger T1-slope of more than 18.84° (OR 3.695, P = 0.012). CONCLUSION:Larger radiographic lower limb-spinal length proportion results in naturally accentuated spinal curves. These patients balance with a larger lumbar lordosis that is closer to the PI and a higher T1-slope which should be considered for spinal realignment. SL differs from GLA and should be separately assessed.Level of Evidence: 3.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the affecting factors on pelvic incidence (PI) and to test the hypothesis that PI changes even after skeletal maturity probably due to hypermobility of the sacroiliac joint using a large international multi-center database. A prospective and cross-sectional healthy adult volunteers, ages 18–80 years, across 5 countries were used. Radiographic measurements included standard whole body alignment parameters. Bivariate regression analyses between PI versus demographics and spino-pelvic anatomical parameters were performed. An effect of sex on pelvic anatomical parameters was also investigated. Multivariate logistic regression with a forward stepwise procedure was performed to identify the contributing factors to PI, and an appropriate model was obtained. PI showed a significant positive correlation with age in pooled data. Divided by sex, however, there was no correlation in men, but women showed a significant higher correlation coefficient. Pelvic thickness (PTh) had a significant negative correlation with age in pooled data. Divided by sex, no correlation was found in men, but there was a significant correlation in women with higher correlation coefficient. The stepwise multivariate analysis for the factors on PI identified four significant factors: age, sex, ethnicity, and PTh. PTh, sex, ethnicity, and age affected PI. There was a positive correlation between PI and age. The tendency was more significant in woman than in man. The results support the hypothesis that PI increases with aging, but the change seems to be small and needs to be verified in a longitudinal evaluation.

In a population of asymptomatic volunteers across 5 countries, we sought to: (a) establish normative values of the Odontoid-Central Sacral Vertical Line (OD-CSVL) across patient factors, and (b) assess correlations of OD-CSVL with other radiographic parameters. A prospective, cross-sectional study of asymptomatic adult volunteers, ages 18–80 years, were enrolled across 5 countries (France, Japan, Singapore, Tunisia, United States) forming the Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS) cohort. Included volunteers had no known spinal disorder(s), no significant neck/back pain (VAS ≤ 2; ODI ≤ 20), and no significant scoliosis (Cobb ≤ 20°). Radiographic measurements included commonly used coronal alignment parameters (mm) and angles (°). OD-CSVL was defined as the difference between the odontoid plumb line (line from the tip of the odontoid vertically down) and the CSVL (vertical line from the center of the sacrum). Chi-square, student’s t tests, Kruskal–Wallis, Wilcoxon rank-sum, linear regression, and Pearson’s correlation were used with significance at p < 0.05. 467 volunteers were included with normative OD-CSVL values by age decade, gender, BMI, and country. Mean ± SD OD-CSVL was 8.3 mm ± 6.5 mm and 31 (6.6%) volunteers were almost perfectly aligned (OD-CSVL < 1 mm). A linear relationship was seen between OD-CSVL with both age (p < 0.001) and BMI (p = 0.015). Significant variation was seen between OD-CSVL and 5 different ethnicities (p = 0.004). OD-CSVL correlated best with other coronal radiographic parameters, C7-CSVL (r = 0.743, p < 0.001), OD-knee (r = 0.230, p < 0.001), CAM-knee (r = 0.612, p < 0.001), and regional TL cobb angle (r = 0.4214, p = 0.005). Among asymptomatic volunteers, increased OD-CSVL was significantly associated with increased age, increased BMI, and ethnicity, but not gender. OD-CSVL correlated strongest with C7-CSVL, TL cobb angle, OD-knee, and CAM-knee. OD-CSVL. These results support further study of OD-CSVL in symptomatic adult spine deformity patients.

Study Design. Single-center retrospective review of outcomes among three surgical techniques in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis (T-AIS) with a follow-up of at least 5 years. Objective. To investigate how outcomes compare in video-assisted anterior thoracic instrumentation (VATS), all hooks/hook-pedicle screw hybrid instrumentation (HHF), and all pedicle screw instrumentation (PSF) techniques for T-AIS. Summary of Background Data. Studies comparing outcomes for anterior versus posterior fusion for T-AIS are few and with short follow-up. Methods. Three groups of patients with T-AIS who underwent thoracic fusion were included in this study: 98 patients with mean curve of 49.0° ± 9.5° underwent VATS (Group 1); 44 patients with mean curve of 51.1° ± 7.4° underwent HHF (Group 2); and 47 patients with mean curve of 47.6° ± 9.9° underwent PSF (Group 3). Radiological outcomes were compared at preoperative, and up to 5 years. Surgical outcomes were noted until latest follow-up. Results. Group 1 had less blood loss, less fusion levels, longer surgical time, and longer hospital stay compared with the other groups (P < 0.01). Groups 1 and 3 were comparable in all time periods with 78.8% and 78.2% immediate curve correction, and 72.9% and 72.1% at 5 years, respectively. Group 2 had lower correction in all time periods (P < 0.0001). Thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis decreased in Group 3, but improved in both Groups 1 and 2 (P < 0.0001). Group 1 had more respiratory complications. The posterior groups had more deep wound infections. Two patients in Group 1 and one patient in Group 2 required revision surgery for implant-related complications. Reoperations for deep wound infections were noted only in the posterior groups. Conclusion. This is the first report comparing 5 year outcomes between anterior and posterior surgery for T-AIS. All three surgical methods resulted in significant and durable scoliosis correction; however, curve correction using HHF was inferior to both VATS and PSF with the latter two groups achieving similar coronal correction. However, VATS involved fewer segments, kyphosis improvement, and no deep wound infection, whereas PSF has less surgical time, shorter hospital stays, and no revision surgery from implant-related complications. Level of Evidence: 3

STUDY DESIGN:Cross-sectional radiographic comparison study.OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to understand whole-body balancing in directed and natural standing postures, through comparison of kypholordotic ratios on whole-body radiographs of young, healthy subjects.SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:Recent studies highlighted the importance of understanding whole-body balancing, proposing the use of the more physiological natural standing posture, together with the conventional directed standing posture, for imaging.METHODS:Sixty healthy, 21-year-old subjects (36 males, 24 females) were recruited. EOS whole-body radiographs of subjects in directed and natural standing postures were obtained. Radiographic parameters compared include C2-sagittal vertical axis (C2-SVA), C7-SVA, C2-7-SVA, global cervical angles (C0-T1 and C2-C7), regional cervical angles (C0-C2, C2-C4, C4-C7), T1-slope, global thoracic angles (T1-T12 and T1-inflection vertebra [Inf]), thoracolumbar angle (T11-L2), global lumbar angles (T12-S1 and Inf-S1), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), spinocoxa angle (SCA), and femoral alignment angle (FAA). Kypholordotic ratios of T1-12/T12-S1, T1-Inf/Inf-S1, Tl-Inf/SCA, and (T1-Inf + FAA)/(T1-slope + SCA) were calculated and compared.RESULTS:Compared to directed standing, natural standing has greater C2-SVA and C7-SVA, more lordotic global and regional cervical angles (except C0-2 angle), higher T1-slope, larger T1- T12 and T1-Inf kyphotic angles, smaller T12-S1 and Inf-S1 lordotic angles, larger PT, more lordotic SCA, and smaller SS and FAA angles. T1-12/T12-S1 and T1-Inf/Inf-S1 ratios in natural standing, and (Tl-Inf + FAA)/(T1-slope + SCA) ratio in both postures approximate 1. There were significant differences between postures for Tl-l2/Tl2-Sl, Tl-Inf/Inf-Sl and Tl-Inf/SCA ratios.CONCLUSION:Whole-body balancing requires understanding of the balance between kyphosis and lordosis, which varies with the posture of patients. Analysis of kypholordotic ratios obtained in this study allude to the importance of performing whole-body imaging in the directed standing posture, and whole-spine or whole-body imaging in the natural standing posture, so as to fully understand spinal and whole body balancing for spinal realignment surgeries.Level of Evidence: Level 3.

MiniThis is a long-term prospective cohort study comparing the radiographic outcomes of anterior versus posterior instrumentation for Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Both approaches were comparable in terms of radiographic outcomes up to 10 years. The posterior approach is more prone to developing proximal junctional kyphosis. Study Design.Prospective cohort study.Objective.To compare the long-term, radiographic coronal and sagittal outcomes of these two approaches at 10-year follow-up.Summary of Background Data.Both anterior and posterior instrumented fusions have been found to be safe and effective treatments for Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with up to 2 to 5 years of follow-up. Few studies follow patients beyond this duration.Methods.36 patients who underwent anterior (n=25) or posterior instrumented spinal fusion (n=11) for Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis over a 4-year period were recruited and followed for 10 years. Preoperative clinical data include patient's age and age of menarche. Operative data included instrumented levels, duration of surgery, and surgical blood loss. Postoperative data included duration of hospital stay, duration of intensive care unit stay, and complications. Pre- and postoperative radiographic data collected include coronal Cobb angles for structural thoracolumbar/lumbar curves, and sagittal angles-sagittal vertical axis, thoracic kyphosis, global lumbar angle, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and upper and lower end vertebrae.Results.Posterior surgery had a shorter operative time (P<0.010) and hospital stay (P<0.010). Coronal plane deformity improved by a mean of 74% in the anterior group and 71% in the posterior group. There was no significant change at 10 years in both groups (anterior P=0.455 and posterior P=0.325). Sagittal parameters remained unchanged. There was a higher incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis in the posterior (45%) compared to the anterior (16%) group (P<0.010).Conclusion.Both anterior and posterior instrumentation and fusion are successful surgeries after 10 years of follow-up. They are comparable with regards to their ability to achieve and maintain good correction of scoliotic deformities and have a low rate of pseudoarthrosis and instrument failure. Ideal sagittal parameters are maintained up to 10 years of follow-up.Level of Evidence: 3

Posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion is the gold standard of surgical treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This procedure is conventionally performed open, through a posterior midline approach. Minimally invasive spinal surgery (MIS) has been found to be associated with decreased blood loss, shorter duration of hospital stays, earlier mobilization, and decreased analgesic requirements in other areas of spinal surgery. In the treatment of patients with AIS, these principles can be applied via a posterior MIS approach and an anterior thoracoscopic approach. This article aimed to provide an overview of the current state of knowledge of MIS for AIS surgery. We will describe the rationale for the use of posterior MIS for AIS, a description of the surgical technique and a discussion of the current evidence for its use. We will also describe the indications, surgical technique, and evidence for MIS anterior spinal fusion as a definitive procedure for AIS and for non-fusion convex growth modulation procedures.

MINI: Spinal sagittal realignment necessitates a reference posture, and thus far this has only been defined for an "averaged" curve via horizontal offsets from the gravity line (GL). This prospective study of 169 healthy subjects demonstrates normative sagittal spatial orientation of each vertebra, for all Roussouly curve types, using vertebral slopes and horizontal offsets from the GL.STUDY DESIGN:Prospective study.OBJECTIVE:To map the healthy standing alignment of the adult spine, grouped according to Roussouly curve types, using both horizontal offset distance from the gravity line (GL), as well as vertebral slope measurements.SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:Spinal sagittal realignment requires a reference posture, and this has been defined in the literature via horizontal offsets from the GL. While useful, this does not provide information on the orientation of each vertebral segment, or distinguish between the various physiological curve types.METHODS:A total of 169 consecutive young adult subjects with healthy spines were recruited over a year. (EOS Imaging, Paris, France) whole body radiographs were performed. Radiographic measurements collected included sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1-slope, global cervical angle (GCA), global thoracic angle (GTA), global lumbar angle (GLA), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), apical and inflection vertebrae. Outcome measures comprised slope measurements, and distance offsets relative to the GL for individual vertebrae from T3 to S1.RESULTS:GLA, PI, PT, SS, apex of lordosis, and inflection vertebra were significantly different across groups, while SVA, T1-slope, GCA, GTA, and apex of kyphosis were not. Mean PI to LL discrepancy for Type I to IV groups were 8.0°, 2.3°, 4.8°, and 3.0°, respectively. Between groups, T3, T7 to T12, and L2 to S1 slopes and T9 to L3 offset distances from GL were significantly different, while the distance of the hip center from the GL was not. GLA was significantly different between curve types except between Type 1 and 2 curves, while the inflection vertebrae were not significantly different between Type 1 and 2 curves, as well as Type 3 and 4 curves.CONCLUSION:This study demonstrates normative sagittal spatial orientation of each vertebra in healthy adults, for each Roussouly type. Comparison across groups suggests the possibility of further refining the sagittal curve patterns described by Roussouly.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:3.

Neuropathic pain remains underrecognised and ineffectively treated in chronic pain sufferers. Consequently, their quality of life is considerably reduced, and substantial healthcare costs are incurred. The anatomical location of pain must be identified for definitive diagnosis, but current neuropsychological tools cannot do so. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) are thought to maintain peripheral neuroinflammation, and MMP-12 is elevated particularly in such pathological conditions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the peripheral nervous system has made headway, owing to its high-contrast resolution and multiplanar features. We sought to improve MRI specificity of neural lesions, by constructing an MMP-12-targeted magnetic iron oxide nanoparticle (IONP). Its in vivo efficiency was evaluated in a rodent model of neuropathic pain, where the left lumbar 5 (L5) spinal nerve was tightly ligated. Spinal nerve ligation (SNL) successfully induced mechanical allodynia, and thermal hyperalgesia, in the left hind paw throughout the study duration. These neuropathy characteristics were absent in animals that underwent sham surgery. MMP-12 upregulation with concomitant macrophage infiltration, demyelination, and elastin fibre loss was observed at the site of ligation. This was not observed in spinal nerves contralateral and ipsilateral to the ligated spinal nerve or uninjured left L5 spinal nerves. The synthesised MMP-12-targeted magnetic IONP was stable and nontoxic in vitro. It was administered onto the left L5 spinal nerve by intrathecal injection, and decreased magnetic resonance (MR) signal was observed at the site of ligation. Histology analysis confirmed the presence of iron in ligated spinal nerves, whereas iron was not detected in uninjured left L5 spinal nerves. Therefore, MMP-12 is a potential biomarker of neuropathic pain. Its detection in vivo, using IONP-enhanced MRI, may be further developed as a tool for neuropathic pain diagnosis and management.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Imaging for adult spinal deformity is conventionally performed in a directed manner to assess the most upright standing posture one can assume. However, this method does not reflect an individual's natural, relaxed posture, which is the posture a patient likely reverts to postoperatively, and also the posture likely to explain spinal pathologies. PURPOSE: To identify radiographic differences between directed and natural, relaxed standing postures in young healthy subjects. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, prospective, radiographic study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Sixty healthy 21-year-old subjects (48 male, 12 female). OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiographic parameters including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), C2 SVA, C2-7 SVA global cervical angle, T1-slope, global thoracic angle (GTA), thoracolumbar angle (TLA), global lumbar angle (GLA), sacral slope, pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence, femoral alignment angle (FAA), and knee alignment angle (KAA). METHODS: The EOS whole body radiographs of patients in directed and natural, relaxed standing postures were obtained, with subsequent comparison of radiographic parameters. Differences in Roussouly curve types, sagittal curve apices, and end vertebrae were also evaluated. Univariate analyses using Wilcoxon sign-rank, paired t tests, and paired chi-square tests were performed. RESULTS: Compared with directed standing, natural, relaxed standing results in a more kyphotic spinal profile marked by a significantly less lordotic GLA, larger GTA, TLA, and T1-slope. The PT+FAA demonstrated true hip movement during sagittal balancing. Lower thoracic and lumbar apices, lower thoracolumbar end vertebrae, and lower Roussouly curve types were observed during natural, relaxed standing. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found significant differences in sagittal radiographic parameters between directed standing and the natural, relaxed standing posture, with the latter demonstrating a more kyphotic spinal profile in terms of magnitude and span, as well as complementary changes in cervical and spinopelvic alignment. The natural, relaxed standing posture, a marker for energy conservation principles in standing, may infer value in less aggressive lordotic restoration, as well as concentration of lordosis in the lower lumbar spine. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Obesity is a global health problem. It increases the risk of surgical complications and re-operations. While both MIS-TLIF and O-TLIF are reported to have comparably good long-term outcomes for non-obese patients, no consensus has been reached for obese patients.

Background/Purpose: It is unclear whether implant removal is necessary when deep spine infection of spinal instrumentation occurs. This study compares mortality, relapse, and reoperation rates between such patients with and without removal of spine implants. Methods: A total of 20 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline characteristics of the implant removal and nonremoval groups were compared. Outcome measures between groups were compared using multivariable logistic regression and predictors of each outcome identified. Results: There were no significant differences in mortality, relapse, or reoperation rates between groups. Multiple vertebral level involvement was common (85%), and the L4 (30%) and L5 (35%) levels were most commonly involved. The majority of patients had osteomyelitis/spondylodiscitis (50%) and Staphylococcus aureus infections (60%). Thoracic spine infection was associated with relapse (odds ratio = 1.26) and reoperation (odds ratio = 1.101). Conclusion: Implant removal is not always necessary in cases of deep spine infection as retention of implants is not associated with higher mortality, relapse, or reoperation rates.