BackgroundClinical determination of bone fracture healing remains qualitative, typically determined through the combination of plain film radiographs, clinical assessment, and patient-reported pain. Importantly, standard radiographs can only detect bone formation in the fracture site after sufficient tissue mineralization has occurred, restricting utility to the later stages of bone repair. A more rigorous method for determining fracture healing progression could significantly improve patient care. Quantitative biomarkers have gained diagnostic value in many clinical indications. Multiple bone turnover biomarkers have been successfully utilized for diagnosis and clinical management of osteoporosis. However, there remains limited evidence for the correlation and diagnostic efficacy of these biomarkers when applied to fracture repair.Methods and findingsHere we present data from a large cohort of participants without (n = 111) or with (n = 153) fracture with the primary outcome of interest our blood-based biomarker which detects the degradation product of the trimeric collagen X protein (CXM). Collagen X is a transient extracellular matrix protein synthesized by hypertrophic chondrocytes during the soft callus phase of endochondral fracture repair. Our data show that healthy patients with an age range of 21-85 years without fracture (enrolled 2018-2020) have low circulating levels of CXM (median = 563.4 pg/mL; interquartile range (IQR) [483.2, 771.1]) that do not vary independently with age (r = 0.04, p = 0.26) or sex (p = 0.42). Fracture data includes patients with an acute closed or low grade open (Gustilo type I or II) tibial or femoral shaft fracture from a secondary analysis of the VitaShock study (NCT02786498, n = 102: enrolled through the University of Maryland 2016-2019), complemented by a new prospectively enrolled observational study that recruited from the Oregon Health & Science University level 1 academic trauma center (n = 51: enrolled 2019-2023) that were followed until the patient was deemed clinically healed or until they failed to return for follow-up. We show that in serum CXM positively correlates to the bone biomarkers N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (P1NP, r = 0.50, p < 0.0001), C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX, r = 0.40, p < 0.0001), and osteocalcin (r = 0.26, p = 0.0411); with a negative correlation to the obesity biomarker leptin (r = -0.31, p = 0.0138). Further, patients with early healing exhibited a peak in CXM at 6 weeks of 1,092 pg/mL (95% confidence interval (CI) [804.8, 1,379]), which was significantly higher than patients with normal healing of 630.8 pg/mL (95% CI [399.9, 861.8]; p = 0.016). We then show that we can reliably transfer this assay from serum collection through venipuncture to a dried blood spot (DBS) collected by finger prick (r = 0.75, Serum = 0.4217*DBS + 181.9, p < 0.0001). Using DBS, the prospective clinical observational study finally suggests that median time-to-peak CXM is at 25.5 days following the elimination of outliers (n = 6) using Robust Regression and Outlier Removal (ROUT, Q = 1%). This study did not find significant differences in CXM expression according to age, sex, or bone that are likely due to the main limitation of an observational study.ConclusionThis rigorous data set supports the future prospective use of the CXM biomarker collected by finger prick in interventional fracture studies and/or in observational studies requiring quantitative assessments of long-bone healing.

We tested whether residents would improve in fluoroscopy knowledge and ability after using an inexpensive novel pelvis model and educational website. Twenty-four orthopaedic residents were recruited from three United States residency programs and randomised into two groups with equal numbers of juniors and seniors. The OrthoAcademy group received educational materials from a website ( www.theorthoacademy.com ), whereas the control group did not. Survey scores, radiograph scores, number of fluoroscopic images taken, and overall radiation exposure were compared (1) between control and OrthoAcademy groups and (2) between junior and senior residents. Both groups had higher radiograph scores at the second round of testing than at the first (P =.004). The OrthoAcademy group had higher post-test than pre-test knowledge survey scores (P =.045), whereas the control group did not (P =.54). However, the OrthoAcademy group did not have higher radiograph scores between tests (P =.15), whereas the control group did (P =.01). Junior residents had higher second-round than first-round radiograph scores (P =.005) and survey scores (P =.006), whereas senior residents did not (P =.24 radiograph scores) (P =.30 survey scores). Testing residents with this novel pelvis model improved the quality of the fluoroscopic images obtained by the residents, especially juniors. This study highlighted the need for more accessible resources for residents to learn about obtaining these images.

Treatment for femoral shaft fractures throughout history was a particularly challenging problem with poor outcomes until recent times. Injury to the femur bone prior to reliable methods of stabilization and fixation meant nearly certain death or profound disability for the rest of the patient’s days. Physicians and surgeons over time devised various mechanisms for splinting, stabilizing and providing traction for nonoperative treatment. Eventually, surgical treatment became a safe and reliable method for addressing these injuries. Advancements in treatment for femur fractures was tackled by some of the great physicians throughout history, including Hippocrates and Galen. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide an overview of the major milestones in care for femur fractures throughout the course of human history.

Skiing and snowboarding are popular competitive and recreational sports that can be associated with significant injury. Previous studies of skiing and snowboarding injuries have been conducted, but studies evaluating injury types and patterns over long periods of time are needed to drive effective injury prevention efforts. We hypothesized that injury patterns would differ among snowboarders and skiers and that the number of injuries remained constant over time. This is a retrospective study of patients presenting with skiing or snowboarding injuries to the United States emergency departments from 2000 to 2019. A total of 34,720 injured skiers (48.0%) and snowboarders (52.0%) presented to US emergency departments over a 20-year period, representing an estimated 1,620,576 injuries nationwide. There is a decreasing trend of the number of injuries over the study period (p=0.012). Males represented the majority (65.7%) of injuries. Skiers were older than snowboarders (mean 30.1 vs. 20.0 years; p<0.001) and patients aged<18 represented more snowboarding (57.0%) than skiing (43.0%) injuries (p<0.001). Common diagnoses included fractures (33.0%) and sprains/strains (26.9%). Snowboarders primarily presented with upper extremity injuries, meanwhile, skiers primarily presented with lower extremity injuries. Most patients (93.2%), were treated and discharged from the emergency departments. Understanding the epidemiology of injuries presenting to emergency departments can help guide prehospital care and medical coverage allocation for resorts and event organizers, as well as identifying areas for targeted injury prevention efforts.

Objective:Social distancing protocols due to the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in premature ending of athletic seasons and cancellation of upcoming seasons, placing significant stress on young athletes. Inability to play or forced early retirement has significant consequences on athlete's mental health, as demonstrated by an extensive body of injury literature. We hypothesize that premature suspension and cancellation of athletic events due to the COVID-19 pandemic leads to higher incidence of depressive symptoms among high-school and collegiate athletes. Further, athletes who strongly derive their sense of self-worth centered around athletics would have higher rates of depressive symptoms.Methods:High school and collegiate athletes were evaluated for depressive symptoms, emotional health and athletic identity measures through validated assessment instruments from May 2020 through July 2020. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Depression Computer Adaptive Test (PROMIS-10 Depression CAT), Veterans RAND-12 (VR-12), which comprises both a physical and mental health component, and Athletic Identity Measurement Scale (AIMS) were utilized.Results:Mental health assessments were completed by 515 athletes (52.4% male, 47.6% female; .84.5% collegiate, 15.5% high school). Female athletes scored significantly worse than males on VR-12 mental health assessments, as well as PROMIS-10 Depression scores; however, males scored significantly lower than females on VR-12 physical health assessments, irrespective of education level. Athletes who had strong associations with athletics as central to their personal identity exhibited worse psychologic impact on VR-12 mental health and PROMIS-10 Depression measures and female athletes in this cohort reported greater depressive symptoms than males.Conclusion:Social distancing protocols due to the COVID-19 pandemic have limited athlete's ability to participate in sports at the training and competition level. Higher rates of depressive symptoms in high school and college athletes have resulted among female athletes and those who identify strongly as an athlete.

Reconstruction of the hip joint in the setting of metastatic lesions of the acetabulum is particularly challenging and can carry significant morbidity for patients who are already medically frail. Novel techniques to minimize morbidity and optimize function warrant exploration for these patients. Here, we present a 50-year-old woman was unable to walk secondary to metastatic breast cancer involving the acetabulum with articular disruption. A primary reconstruction technique was used that combined percutaneous stabilization of the acetabulum and cemented total hip arthroplasty using primary components. Existing reconstructive techniques for metastatic lesions of the acetabulum often require extensive open surgical approaches and revision components. Percutaneous acetabular stabilization combined with cemented total hip replacement may be a less-morbid and equally durable option.

CONTEXT:The risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear for athletes participating in pivoting sports includes young age and female sex. A previous meta-analysis has reported a reinjury rate of 15% after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) for athletes across all sports. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of available literature reporting outcomes after ACLR in soccer players.OBJECTIVE:To review and aggregate soccer-specific outcomes data after ACLR found in current literature to help guide a more tailored discussion regarding expectations and prognosis for soccer players seeking operative management of ACL injuries.DATA SOURCES:A comprehensive search of publications was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and SPORTDiscus databases.STUDY SELECTION:Inclusion criteria consisted of original studies, level of evidence 1 to 4, studies reporting clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after primary ACLR in soccer players at all follow-up length.STUDY DESIGN:The primary outcomes of interest were graft failure/reoperation rates, ACL injury in contralateral knee, return to soccer time, and PROs.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Level 4.DATA EXTRACTION:Search of literature yielded 32 studies for inclusion that involved 3112 soccer players after ACLR.RESULTS:The overall graft failure/reoperation rate ranged between 3.0% and 24.8% (mean follow-up range, 2.3-10 years) and the combined ACL graft failure and contralateral ACL injury rate after initial ACLR was 1.0% to 16.7% (mean follow-up range, 3-10 years); a subgroup analysis for female and male players revealed a secondary ACL injury incidence rate of 27%, 95% CI (22%, 32%) and 10%, 95% CI (6%, 15%), respectively. Soccer players were able to return to play between 6.1 and 11.1 months and the majority of PROs showed favorable scores at medium-term follow-up.CONCLUSION:Soccer players experience high ACL injury rates after primary ACLR and demonstrated similar reinjury rates as found in previous literature of athletes who participate in high-demand pivoting sports.

Aging leads to several geriatric conditions including osteoporosis (OP) and associated frailty syndrome. Treatments for these conditions are limited and none target fundamental drivers of pathology, and thus identifying strategies to delay progressive loss of tissue homeostasis and functional reserve will significantly improve quality of life in elderly individuals. A fundamental property of aging is the accumulation of senescent cells. Senescence is a cell state defined by loss of proliferative capacity, resistance to apoptosis, and the release of a proinflammatory and anti-regenerative senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). The accumulation of senescent cells and SASP factors is thought to significantly contribute to systemic aging. Senolytics—compounds which selectively target and kill senescent cells—have been characterized to target and inhibit anti-apoptotic pathways that are upregulated during senescence, which can elicit apoptosis in senescent cells and relieve SASP production. Senescent cells have been linked to several age-related pathologies including bone density loss and osteoarthritis in mice. Previous studies in murine models of OP have demonstrated that targeting senescent cells pharmacologically with senolytic drugs can reduce symptomology of the disease. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of senolytic drugs (dasatinib, quercetin, and fisetin) to improve age-associated degeneration in bone using the Zmpste24−/− (Z24−/−) progeria murine system for Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS). We found that the combination of dasatinib plus quercetin could not significantly mitigate trabecular bone loss although fisetin administration could reduce bone density loss in the accelerated aging Z24−/− model. Furthermore, the overt bone density loss observed in the Z24−/− model reported herein highlights the Z24 model as a translational model to recapitulate alterations in bone density associated with advanced age. Consistent with the “geroscience hypothesis,” these data demonstrate the utility of targeting a fundamental driver of systemic aging (senescent cell accumulation) to alleviate a common condition with age, bone deterioration.

Distal radius fractures are common orthopedic injuries. Treatment has varied historically, but volar locking plating currently predominates. Although flexor tendon injury is a well-studied complication of this operation, extensor tendon injury is less well studied. The purpose of this review is to search the literature and present the epidemiology, presentation, and treatment of this complication. The Cochrane, EMBASE, PubMed, and SCOPUS databases were searched for the terms “volar” + “radius” + (“plate” OR “plating”) + “extensor.” Ninety final studies were included for analysis in this review. The incidence of extensor tendon rupture varies from 0% to 12.5%; the extensor pollicis longus is most commonly ruptured. The presentation and management of extensor tendon injury after injury, intraoperatively, and postoperatively are summarized. Radiographic views are described to detect screw prominence and minimize intraoperative risk. Extensor tendon injury after volar locking plate for distal radius fractures is an uncommon injury with several risk factors including dorsal screw prominence and fracture fragments. Removal of hardware and tendon transfers or reconstruction may be necessary to prevent loss of extensor mechanism.

Infection is a common cause of impaired fracture healing. In the clinical setting, definitive fracture treatment and infection are often treated separately and sequentially, by different clinical specialties. The ability to treat infection while promoting fracture healing will greatly reduce the cost, number of procedures, and patient morbidity associated with infected fractures. In order to develop new therapies, scientists and engineers must understand the clinical need, current standards of care, pathologic effects of infection on fractures, available preclinical models, and novel technologies. One of the main causes of poor fracture healing is infection; unfortunately, bone regeneration and infection research are typically approached independently and viewed as two separate disciplines. Here, we aim to bring these two groups together in an educational workshop to promote research into the basic and translational science that will address the clinical challenge of delayed fracture healing due to infection. Statement of clinical significance: Infection and nonunion are each feared outcomes in fracture care, and infection is a significant driver of nonunion. The impact of nonunions on patie[Q2]nt well-being is substantial. Outcome data suggests a long bone nonunion is as impactful on health-related quality of life measures as a diagnosis of type 1 diabetes and fracture-related infection has been shown to significantly l[Q3]ower a patient's quality of life for over 4 years. Although they frequently are associated with one another, the treatment approaches for infections and nonunions are not always complimentary and cannot be performed simultaneously without accepting tradeoffs. Furthermore, different clinical specialties are often required to address the problem, the orthopedic surgeon treating the fracture and an infectious disease specialist addressing the sources of infection. A sequential approach that optimizes treatment parameters requires more time, more surgeries, and thus confers increased morbidity to the patient. The ability to solve fracture healing and infection clearance simultaneously in a contaminated defect would benefit both the patient and the health care system.

PURPOSE:Despite the extensive use of PROs in ankle fracture research, no study has quantified which PROs are most commonly used for assessing outcomes of patients who sustain fractures of the posterior malleolus. The purpose of this study was therefore to quantify which PROs are most commonly used for outcome research after posterior malleolus fractures.METHODS:A systematic search was performed using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. Articles were identified through Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and cochrane central register of controlled trials through May of 2021. Included articles were analyzed for the primary outcome of the most commonly reported PRO.RESULTS:The American orthopedic foot and ankle ankle-hindfoot score (AOFAS) was the most commonly used PRO for assessment of posterior malleolus fracture outcomes, used in 37 of 72 studies (51.4%). The second and third most common were the olerud-molander ankle score (OMAS) (22 studies, 30.6%) and the visual analogue score (VAS) (21 studies, 29.2%). Eleven different PROs were used only once. Quality of evidence was graded as low given the percentage of studies that were observational or case series (68 of 72 studies, 94.4%).CONCLUSION:Investigators have used many different PROs to assess outcomes for posterior malleolus fractures, the most common of which are the AOFAS, OMAS, and VAS. Future investigators should attempt to unify outcome reporting for these injuries.

Background:The objective of this study was to compare inpatient mortality rates for patients with operatively treated closed femoral shaft fractures (AO/OTA 32 A-C) who received venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis with either low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin.Methods:This was a retrospective cohort study of a national database of patients presenting to Level I through IV trauma centers in the United States. All patients ≥18 years of age who sustained an operatively treated closed femoral shaft fracture were included. The primary outcome of inpatient mortality was compared between two groups: those who received LMWH or unfractionated heparin for VTE prophylaxis. Secondary outcomes were complications including VTE and bleeding events. Groups were compared using a multivariate regression model.Results:There were 2058 patients included in the study. Patients who received VTE prophylaxis with LMWH had lower odds of inpatient mortality compared to patients who received VTE prophylaxis with unfractionated heparin (OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.68, p = 0.011).Conclusions:VTE prophylaxis with LMWH is associated with lower inpatient mortality compared to VTE prophylaxis with unfractionated heparin for patients undergoing operative treatment of closed femoral shaft fractures. To our knowledge this is the first study to report these associations for a specific subset of orthopedic trauma patients.

Background Subdermal etonogestrel implants are highly effective contraceptive methods. Despite standardization of insertion technique by the manufacturer, some implants are inadvertently placed too deeply within or below the plane of the biceps brachii fascia. Placement of these implants in a deep tissue plane results in more difficult removal, which is not always possible in the office setting. In rare cases, surgical removal by an upper extremity surgeon is warranted. Case presentation Here we present 6 cases of etonogestrel implants located in a subfascial plane requiring removal by an upper extremity surgeon. Implants were all localized with plain radiography and ultrasound prior to surgical removal. All cases had implants located in the subfascial plane and one was identified intramuscularly. The average age was 28 years (19–33) and BMI was 24.0 kg/m^2 (19.1–36.5), with the most common reason for removal being irregular bleeding. The majority of cases (5/6) were performed under monitored anesthesia care with local anesthetic and one case utilized regional anesthesia. All implants were surgically removed without complication. Conclusions Insertion of etonogestrel contraceptive implants deep to the biceps brachii fascia is a rare, but dangerous complication. Removal of these implants is not always successful in the office setting and referral to an upper extremity surgeon is necessary to avoid damage to delicate neurovascular structures for safe removal.

Background: Injury to the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow is common among overhead throwing athletes and can result in significant functional limitations. While surgical reconstruction offers high rates of return to competition, there are no validated or universally accepted guidelines for determining when an athlete can safely resume play. Purpose: To assess the existing scientific literature for return-to-competition criteria utilized after ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The PubMed database was searched for clinical investigations of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in overhead throwing athletes published between January 2000 and June 2020. Only studies that had a minimum follow-up of 1 year and included at least 1 specific return-to-competition criterion were considered. Results: A total of 15 studies were included in the final analysis, encompassing 1156 patients with an average age of 20.7 years (SD, 2.0 years). Baseball players composed 96.3% of patients for whom sport was specified, and 92.4% of baseball players were pitchers. The most common return-to-competition criterion, identified in 87% of studies, was completion of a return-to-throwing program, which started on average 16.7 weeks (range, 12-18 weeks) after surgery. A return-to-mound program was utilized in 53% of studies, starting on average 7.4 months (range, 6-9 months) postoperatively. Minimum time from surgery was used in 73% studies, with players waiting 7 to 12 months (mean, 9.7; SD, 1.4 months) after surgery before return-to-competition consideration. The overall rate of return to competition at the preinjury level or higher was 85.7% (SD, 8.5%) at an average of 12.2 months (SD, 0.6 months). Conclusion: In general, we observed a paucity of literature describing the return-to-competition process after ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in overhead throwing athletes. Only 3 explicit return-to-competition criteria were identified across all studies: completion of a return-to-throwing program, completion of a return-to-mound program for pitchers, and minimum time from surgery. Increased transparency regarding postoperative rehabilitation protocols and further research are necessary to identify and validate sport-specific return-to-competition criteria, which will ultimately help athletes return to play in a safe and timely fashion after ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction.

Indian orthopedists have a legacy dating back more than 4000 years. Starting with the Harappan civilization, ancient orthopaedic surgeons reduced fractures and conducted therapeutic trepanations. Since then, Indian physicians have pioneered many of the orthopaedic techniques still used today — including the use of prosthetics, fracture tables, and rehabilitative physical therapy. Today, orthopaedic surgeons coexist with traditional Indian bonesetters. Although bonesetting practices can have complication rates as high as 40%, bonesetters still handle a majority of fractures in India and are often culturally preferred. Importantly though, bonesetters are often the only expedient option available in both rural and urban settings.

Purpose: To examine the effect of arthroscopic simulator training on technical performance in a human model. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Literature searches of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were conducted using combinations of the terms virtual, digital, computer, reality, simulation, arthroscopy, training, learning, and education. Studies were considered for inclusion if they tested the effect of arthroscopic simulator training in a randomized controlled fashion, performed testing in a cadaver or live patient, and used explicit outcome measures of technical skill. Data from studies were extracted and study characteristics and outcomes were reviewed. The primary outcome measure was the number of studies in which the simulation trained group had significantly improved performance results relative to the control group in >= 50% of all measured outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane's Collaboration Tool. Results: Twelve studies, including 340 total study participants, were included for review. Eight studies showed improved performance of the simulation trained group relative to the control group in >= 50% of assessed outcomes. Six of ten studies reporting completion time, three of six studies reporting task checklist completion, 3 of 7 studies reporting global rating scales, and 1 of 4 studies reporting Arthroscopic Surgical Skill Evaluation Tool scores showed improved performance of the simulation group relative to the control group for the respective outcome measures. Conclusions: The literature is limited due to heterogeneity, both in type and merit, of the outcome measures that have been used to assess the transfer validity of arthroscopic simulator training to clinical performance. Despite the limitations of the literature, this review demonstrates that arthroscopic simulator training has potential to improve clinical performance.

Purpose To examine the effect of arthroscopic simulator training on technical performance in a human model. Methods A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Literature searches of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were conducted using combinations of the terms virtual, digital, computer, reality, simulation, arthroscopy, training, learning, and education. Studies were considered for inclusion if they tested the effect of arthroscopic simulator training in a randomized controlled fashion, performed testing in a cadaver or live patient, and used explicit outcome measures of technical skill. Data from studies were extracted and study characteristics and outcomes were reviewed. The primary outcome measure was the number of studies in which the simulation trained group had significantly improved performance results relative to the control group in ≥50% of all measured outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane’s Collaboration Tool. Results Twelve studies, including 340 total study participants, were included for review. Eight studies showed improved performance of the simulation trained group relative to the control group in ≥50% of assessed outcomes. Six of ten studies reporting completion time, three of six studies reporting task checklist completion, 3 of 7 studies reporting global rating scales, and 1 of 4 studies reporting Arthroscopic Surgical Skill Evaluation Tool scores showed improved performance of the simulation group relative to the control group for the respective outcome measures. Conclusions The literature is limited due to heterogeneity, both in type and merit, of the outcome measures that have been used to assess the transfer validity of arthroscopic simulator training to clinical performance. Despite the limitations of the literature, this review demonstrates that arthroscopic simulator training has potential to improve clinical performance. Level of Evidence II, systematic review of Level II studies. To examine the effect of arthroscopic simulator training on technical performance in a human model. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Literature searches of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were conducted using combinations of the terms virtual, digital, computer, reality, simulation, arthroscopy, training, learning, and education. Studies were considered for inclusion if they tested the effect of arthroscopic simulator training in a randomized controlled fashion, performed testing in a cadaver or live patient, and used explicit outcome measures of technical skill. Data from studies were extracted and study characteristics and outcomes were reviewed. The primary outcome measure was the number of studies in which the simulation trained group had significantly improved performance results relative to the control group in ≥50% of all measured outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane’s Collaboration Tool. Twelve studies, including 340 total study participants, were included for review. Eight studies showed improved performance of the simulation trained group relative to the control group in ≥50% of assessed outcomes. Six of ten studies reporting completion time, three of six studies reporting task checklist completion, 3 of 7 studies reporting global rating scales, and 1 of 4 studies reporting Arthroscopic Surgical Skill Evaluation Tool scores showed improved performance of the simulation group relative to the control group for the respective outcome measures. The literature is limited due to heterogeneity, both in type and merit, of the outcome measures that have been used to assess the transfer validity of arthroscopic simulator training to clinical performance. Despite the limitations of the literature, this review demonstrates that arthroscopic simulator training has potential to improve clinical performance.

CASE:A 70-year-old active woman presented with lateral ankle instability 40 years after a lateral ankle reconstruction procedure. Examination demonstrated gross instability, and advanced imaging revealed attenuation of her previous graft. She underwent anatomic reconstruction through a modified Brostrom-Gould technique and was able to return to hiking without pain. CONCLUSION:Recurrent lateral ankle instability after reconstruction represents a unique challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. Utilization of a modified Brostrom-Gould procedure with suture tape augmentation is a promising alternative to allograft or autograft reconstruction for patients with active lifestyle goals in the context of recurrent instability.

Musculoskeletal (MSK) disease comprises over 20% of all visits to healthcare providers each year, yet a disproportionately small percentage of medical school education focuses on MSK disease. Even among students applying into orthopaedic surgery, less than 50% demonstrate prerequisite anatomic knowledge before beginning their residency. Medical school curriculum reform is needed, given that only 15% have a required MSK curriculum. Inadequate education ultimately leads to poor patient care and forces clinicians to learn MSK medicine later in practice. Although this inadequacy in medical school MSK education has been recognized for decades, little has changed to address this critical deficiency. A successful curriculum development requires defining critical MSK topics, evaluative methods to assess knowledge acquisition, and ultimately assessment of applying that knowledge to the care of patients. Newer strategies for MSK education include "near-peer" learning from senior classmates and residents, clinical immersion within MSK care teams, peer interest groups, and standardize learning platforms and assessment tools. Technologies such as virtual reality simulation, adaptive video learning, and other technologies will inform the development of affordable, succinct, evidence-informed curriculums that can enhance medical student MSK education with universal implementation. As clinical practice evolves to optimize patient care, so should the education of physicians who deliver that care.