Background:Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has become the procedure of choice for various indications including atrioventricular block and considered to be physiologic modality of pacing compared with right ventricular apex pacing. Objective:The purpose of this study was to assess ventricular activation and synchrony in patients with an LBBAP device using electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI). Methods:A total of 25 consecutive patients underwent an LBBAP device implantation were included in the study. Electrocardiography (ECG) and ECGI analyses have been performed the day after implantation. Native and paced QRS, left ventricular activation time, right ventricular activation time, and V1-V6 activation delay were calculated using ECG. Total ventricular activation time, left ventricular activation time, intrinsic left ventricular activation time, right ventricular activation time, intrinsic right ventricular activation time, and intraventricular dyssynchrony were calculated based on ECGI. All patients have been followed up to 12 months. Results:All patients were divided in 2 groups (wide and narrow QRS) based on intrinsic ECG and then based on paced ECG parameters. The study showed that for initially narrow QRS group activation time and synchrony during pacing was comparable to native. In wide QRS group these parameters were significantly improved. For paced rhythm analysis classic ECG LBBAP parameters (paced QRS and left ventricular activation time) were not sufficient to properly evaluate the ventricular activation for paced rhythm. Discordance between classic ECG parameters and ECGI analysis was identified. Two additional 12-lead ECG parameters predicting the ECGI measurements were found. Follow-up did not show any worsening of ejection fraction, paced QRS, or pacing parameters. Conclusion:ECG imaging can bring a significant value into assessing the efficacy of new pacing modalities and provide much more data for precise determination of implantation outcome including detailed activation assessment and comparison with intrinsic conduction. Key ECGI values confirming proper ventricular activation have been defined, and corresponding 12-lead parameters were also identified, which allows to predict ventricular activation by using 12-lead ECG only.

BACKGROUND: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is associated with ventricular fibrillation (VF). Different VF mechanisms have been described, and repolarization gradients were associated with VF in a BrS model. The aim of this study is to map VF in BrS with ECG imaging. Furthermore, spatial correlation between sinus rhythm maps and VF maps was evaluated. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were (1) BrS diagnosis and (2) VF mapped with ECG imaging during right ventricle outflow tract ablation. VF mechanism was classified into (1) rotational, (2) focal, and (3) irregular. For comparison, 6 controls were enrolled. The following sinus rhythm maps were performed: activation, recovery time, and activation-recovery interval time. Spatial overlap between steep repolarization gradients (cliffs) at recovery time and activation-recovery interval time maps and initiating VF rotational activity was evaluated with photogrammetry. RESULTS: A total of 28 VF maps in 21 patients with BrS were analyzed. In the first ≈7 seconds of VF, rotational, focal, and irregular mechanisms were found. In 19 patients with BrS (90.5%) and none of the controls, a right ventricle outflow tract repolarization cliff only was found. In all these patients, the singularity point of the first initiating rotational VF activity spatially overlapped with the right ventricle outflow tract cliff. Abolition of right ventricle outflow tract repolarization cliffs was confirmed in all but 2 patients (94.3%). In one patient with recurrence, VF was mapped on the anterior right ventricle over a cliff that was not targeted at the first ablation procedure. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with BrS, repolarization heterogeneity has a critical role in VF. Repolarization cliffs might be a therapeutic target in VF ablation.

BACKGROUND:A novel focal lattice-tip catheter allowing the delivery of either pulsed field (PF) or radiofrequency (RF) energy has recently received regulatory approval. The technology features a proprietary 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system. OBJECTIVE:We describe the first real-world and multicenter experience. METHODS:Consecutive AF patients undergoing first-time or redo atrial tachyarrhythmia ablation with the Affera system were prospectively enrolled at 3 different centers. PF was the only energy source allowed when ablating the posterior left atrium; anterior applications were performed with either RF (PF/RF strategy) or PF (PF/PF strategy) on the basis of the operator's preference. The primary efficacy end point included acute electrical isolation of pulmonary veins and posterior wall or bidirectional block in case of linear lesions. RESULTS:The study included 130 patients (mean age, 67 ± 10 years; 63.8% [n = 83] male; 61.5% [n = 80] nonparoxysmal AF; 55.4% first-time AF ablation). First-time pulmonary vein isolation was performed in 72 patients: RF/PF in 13 (18.1%) patients and PF/PF in the remaining 59 (81.9%); first-pass isolation for pulmonary vein and posterior wall was achieved in 100% of cases. A total of 289 ablation lines were performed (roof line, 91 patients; inferior line, 83 patients; anterior mitral line, 32 patients; posterior mitral line, 45 patients; cavotricuspid isthmus line, 38 patients). First-pass isolation and primary efficacy end point were 96.2% (roof line, 100%; inferior line, 100%; anterior mitral line, 96.9%; posterior mitral line, 84.4%; cavotricuspid isthmus, 92.1%) and 100%, respectively. We had 2 (1.5%) major complications: 1 ST-segment elevation at the inferolateral leads requiring intracoronary administration of nitrate and 1 complete atrioventricular block. CONCLUSION:Catheter ablation with a novel 9-mm lattice-tip catheter confirmed high efficacy and safety in a real-world scenario.

Patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS) have an increased risk of arrhythmias, including atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATas).The purpose of this study was to assess underlying atrial cardiomyopathy in BrS and the effect of ajmaline (AJM) test on the atrium of BrS patients using electrocardiogram imaging (ECGI).All consecutive patients diagnosed with BrS in a monocentric registry were screened and included if they met the following criteria: 1) BrS diagnosed following current recommendations; and 2) ECGI map performed before and after AJM with a standard protocol. Consecutive patients with no structural heart disease or BrS who had undergone ECGI were included as a control group. Genetic analysis for SCN5A was performed in all BrS patients. Total atrial conduction time (TACT) and local atrial conduction time (LACT) were calculated from atrial ECGI. The primary endpoint was ATas during follow-up.Forty-three consecutive BrS patients and 40 control patients were included. Both TACT and LACT were significantly prolonged in BrS patients compared with control patients. Furthermore, TACT and LACT were significantly higher after AJM administration and in BrS patients who were carriers of a pathogenic/likely pathogenic SCN5A variant. After a mean follow-up of 40.9 months, 6 patients experienced a first ATa occurrence (all in the BrS group, 13.9%). TACT was the only independent predictor of ATas with a cutoff of >138.5 ms (sensitivity 0.92 [95% CI: 0.83-0.98], specificity 0.70 [95% CI: 0.59-0.81]).ECGI-calculated TACT and LACT are significantly prolonged in BrS patients compared with control patients, and in BrS patients after AJM. This may be consistent with a concealed atrial cardiomyopathy in BrS.

BACKGROUND Patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS) have an increased risk of arrhythmias, including atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATas). OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to assess underlying atrial cardiomyopathy in BrS and the effect of ajmaline (AJM) test on the atrium of BrS patients using electrocardiogram imaging (ECGI). METHODS All consecutive patients diagnosed with BrS in a monocentric registry were screened and included if they met the following criteria: 1) BrS diagnosed following current recommendations; and 2) ECGI map performed before and after AJM with a standard protocol. Consecutive patients with no structural heart disease or BrS who had undergone ECGI were included as a control group. Genetic analysis for SCN5A was performed in all BrS patients. Total atrial conduction time (TACT) and local atrial conduction time (LACT) were calculated from atrial ECGI. The primary endpoint was ATas during follow-up. RESULTS Forty-three consecutive BrS patients and 40 control patients were included. Both TACT and LACT were significantly prolonged in BrS patients compared with control patients. Furthermore, TACT and LACT were significantly higher after AJM administration and in BrS patients who were carriers of a pathogenic/likely pathogenic SCN5A variant. After a mean follow-up of 40.9 months, 6 patients experienced a first ATa occurrence (all in the BrS group, 13.9%). TACT was the only independent predictor of ATas with a cutoff of >138.5 ms (sensitivity 0.92 [95% CI: 0.83-0.98], specificity 0.70 [95% CI: 0.59-0.81]). CONCLUSIONS ECGI-calculated TACT and LACT are significantly prolonged in BrS patients compared with control patients, and in BrS patients after AJM. This may be consistent with a concealed atrial cardiomyopathy in BrS. (J Am Coll Cardiol EP 2023;9:2096-2105) (c) 2023 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

BackgroundThe novel DiamondTemp ablation system (DTA) and EnSiteX mapping System (EAM) are both CE-Marked and FDA approved medical devices. The DTA has been validated by its manufacturer only in combination with previous version of EnSite System-EnSite Precision. The aim of this study was to evaluate compatibility of DTA with EnSite X with a previously developed protocol.MethodsThree configurations were tested: 3.1. Medtronic Generator connection Box (GCB) and AmpereConnect cable; 3.2. the Medtronic GCB-E and electrogram out cable from GCB to EAM; 3.3. Direct connection of DTA to EAM using intracardiac out cable with no GCB.ResultsThe previously developed universal method for compatibility assessment of ablation catheters and navigation systems was used with success for assessing DTA and EnSite X EAM compatibility, with reproducible results. Accuracy of DTA visualization with different setups was evaluated with a phantom model measuring distances between DTA and reference points. DTA is compatible with EnSiteX EAM with a safety and reliability profile guaranteed, if within the described specifications. In particular, careful setup is mandatory to achieve good clinical outcomes as only setup 3.2 is viable for both NavX and Voxel Mode and demonstrated satisfactory results and accuracy. Setup 3.3 showed a significant shift immediately after catheter insertion. Catheter position was away from baseline points and the dislocation increased during the radiofrequency delivery.ConclusionsPreviously developed method for compatibility assessment of ablation catheters and navigation systems has been used for a new EAM. DTA is compatible with EnSiteX EAM with proper configuration.

OBJECTIVES:Brugada syndrome is a life-threatening disease with an arrhythmogenic substrate located in the epicardium of right ventricle outflow tract. Therefore, the correct region identification is crucial for a successful ablation procedure. Various mapping techniques can be adopted to elaborate this issue, but they were all initially developed for endovascular use.METHODS:In this study, we analysed 21 consecutive hybrid video-assisted thoracoscopic ablation of Brugada syndrome, performed using different mapping systems to identify the ablation target and confirm the elimination of arrhythmogenic substrate; 35 maps have been analysed.RESULTS:Acute success of epicardial right ventricle outflow tract ablation has been achieved in 100% of procedures, no periprocedural complications have been observed; HD Grid catheter showed higher area identification speed and faster fractionated potentials visualization; Rhythmia system has demonstrated the best map density; Carto 3 system showed a significant advantage in patient preparation time, but mapping speed was reduced due to focal catheter use only.CONCLUSIONS:All tested electro anatomical mapping systems can be used for hybrid video-assisted thoracoscopic ablation with same clinical success; however, accuracy and efficacy of mapping systems are heterogenous and highly dependent on proper patient preparation, mapping system and physician skills.

A 38-year-old man with a diagnosis of Brugada syndrome had a recurrence of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia 6 years after successful epicardial right ventricular outflow tract ablation by the use of subxiphoid access. Preprocedural and intraprocedural investigations suggested that the pathologic substrate of the right ventricular outflow tract had not been eliminated completely. Therefore, the patient underwent a hybrid electrophysiology-guided video-assisted thoracoscopic ablation. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Management of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) beyond implantable cardioverter-defibrillator positioning in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is challenging. Catheter ablation of the ventricular substrate often requires a combination of endocardial and epicardial approaches, with disappointing outcomes due to the progressive nature of the disease. We report the Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel experience through a case series of 16 patients with drug-refractory ARVC, who have undergone endocardial and/or epicardial catheter ablation of VAs with a thoracoscopic hybrid-approach. After a mean follow-up time of 5.16 years (SD 2.9 years) from the first hybrid-approach ablation, VA recurrence was observed in 5 patients (31.25%): among these, patients 4 patients (80%) received a previous ablation and 1 of 11 patients (9.09%) who had a hybrid ablation as first approach had a VA recurrence (80% vs 9.09%; logrank p = 0.04). Despite the recurrence rate of arrhythmic events, all patients had a significant reduction in the arrhythmic burden after ablation, with a mean of 4.65 years (SD 2.9 years) of freedom from clinically significant arrhythmias, defined as symptomatic VAs or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator-delivered therapies. In conclusion, our case series confirms that management of VAs in patients with ARVC is difficult because patients do not always respond to antiarrhythmic medications and can require multiple invasive procedures. A multidisciplinary approach involving cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, and cardiac electrophysiologists, together with recent cardiac mapping techniques and ablation tools, might mitigate these difficulties and improve outcomes. (c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2022;181:45-54)

Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is widely accepted as a first-line therapy for cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter (AFL). The novel DiamondTemp (DT) catheter with temperature feedback during RF ablation has been released recently on the market. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of DiamondTemp (DT) technology on ablation efficiency during AFL. In this single-center study, 30 consecutive patients with typical AFL indicated to ablation of CTI were included. The first 15 patients underwent CTI ablation using 8-mm tip catheter, and the following 15 patients underwent temperature-controlled RF ablation using DT catheter. The endpoints were number and mean total duration of RF applications, mean temperature reached in the setting of CTI, procedural times, and fluoroscopy times. There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning baseline characteristics. Mean duration of the each application (71.5 s ± 30.6 vs 12.4 s ± 13.2, p value < 0.001), mean total duration of RF applications (517,73 s ± 377,96 vs 112,8 s ± 43,58; p value < 0.001), procedural times (51.6 min ± 24.2 vs 38.6 ± 8.2; p = 0.03), and fluoroscopy times (16.2 min ± 10.2 vs 8 min ± 4.24; p = 0.005) were longer in the 8-mm ablation catheter group. Mean temperature measurements (51.9 °C ± 3.59 vs 56.7 °C ± 3.34, p value < 0.003) were as well lower in the 8-mm ablation catheter group. Catheter ablation of CTI-dependent AFL by means of DT resulted in a significant reduction of total and single application RF delivery time, procedure, and fluoroscopy times.

A 33-year-old woman with Sick Sinus Node syndrome and persistent atrial fibrillation underwent a Maze IV procedure in order treat atrial fibrillation and concomitant atrial epicardial implantation of a leadless pacemaker to manage her sinus node insufficiency. Last option has been chosen due to rare pocket complication after previous classic dual-chamber pacemaker implantation.

Electrical isolation of pulmonary veins (PVI) is the cornerstone of invasive treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, arrhythmia-free survival of a PVI only approach is suboptimal in patients with persistent and long-term persistent AF. Hybrid AF ablation has been developed with the aim of combining the advantages of a thoracoscopic surgical ablation (direct visualization of anatomical structures to be spared and the possibility to perform epicardial lesions) and endocardial ablation (possibility to check line block, confirm PVI, and possibility to perform cavotricuspid isthmus ablation). Patient selection is of utmost importance. In persistent and long-term persistent AF, hybrid AF ablation demonstrated promising results in terms of AF free survival. It has been associated with a relatively low complication rate if performed in centers with expertise in hybrid procedures and experience with both surgical and endocardial ablation. Different techniques have been described, with different approaches and lesion sets. The aim of this review is to provide a state-of-the-art overview of hybrid AF ablation.

BackgroundNew technologies for ablation procedures are often produced by different companies with no cross-compatibility out of the box. This is not a negligible clinical problem since those separately developed devices are often used together. The aim of this study was to develop a bench-testing method to assess compatibility between the DiamondTemp ablation system (DTA) and the Rhythmia electroanatomic mapping system (EAM).MethodsDifferent setups were tested. DTA was connected to the Rhythmia EAM using the following configurations: 3.1. An Ensite EPT GenConnect box (GCB) and Rhythmia Maestro GCB (Maestro GCB, native Rhythmia setup); 3.2. The Medtronic GCB-E and Maestro GCB; 3.3. The Medtronic GCB-E out via the Medtronic GCB-E directly to the Rhythmia at box 1 (pin A61 to A64).ResultsThe DTA location was represented in real-time on the Rhythmia EAM. A proper tracking of the DTA was observed in all setups tested by visual comparison of physical catheter movements and its representation on EAM. In configuration 3.1, a significant shift was observed after the first radio frequency (RF) application; however, further applications caused no further shift. In setup 3.2, no significant shift was observed. The setup 3.3 showed a massive shift in the catheter position before ablation compared to baseline points acquired using the Orion catheter as a reference.ConclusionsA universal and reproducible solution for compatibility testing between the various mapping systems and the ablation catheters has been described. DTA has been demonstrated as compatible with Rhythmia EAM with satisfactory results if a specific setup is used.