In this Article, we reported that liver X receptors constrain metastatic development of prostate cancer in Pten-null mice. However, following institutional investigations by Universite Clermont Auvergne, it has come to our attention that much of the data reported in the paper were a result of manipulation or fabrication. Specifically, differences in protein expression in western blots presented in Fig. 1e, 3b, g, i, m, and 6b, and Supplementary Figures 2d, 6d, 6h, 7h, 8c, 8d, and 14 were generated by unequal loading of samples. In qPCR experiments presented in Figs. 1f, 3f, 4g, 5h, and 6a, d and Supplementary Figures 2c, 5d, 6g, 8d, 11a-c, and 12b, differences in expression level were manipulated through adjustment of cycle numbers, selection of samples, and data fabrication. Differences in immunostaining in Figs. 2g, k and 7e were obtained by selection of images or manipulation of exposure levels. Observed differences in relative luminescence units in Figs. 3m, 4e, and Supplementary Figures 6f, 7a, 7b, 10, and 11f were due to experiment selection. In light of these findings, we have no confidence in the accuracy of the reported data and the conclusions of the paper. We therefore wish to retract the paper. We deeply regret these circumstances and apologize to the scientific community.

This paper has been retracted at the request of the authors.

Cholesterol is a fundamental molecule for life. Located in the cell membrane, this sterol participates to the cell signaling of growth factors. Inside the cell it can be converted in hormones such as androgens or modulate the immune response. Such important functions could not be solely dependent of external supply by diet hence de novo synthesis could occur from acetate in almost all mammalian cells. If a deficiency in cholesterol sourcing leads to development troubles, overstocking has been associated to various diseases such as atherosclerosis and cancers. Cholesterol homeostasis should thus be tightly regulated at the uptake, de novo synthesis, storage and export processes. Various transcription factors have been described these last years as important to regulate cholesterol levels. Besides, synthetic molecules have been developed for many years to modulate cholesterol synthesis, such as statins. Many articles have associated prostate cancer, whose incidence is constantly increasing, to cholesterol disequilibrium. Targeting cholesterol could thus be a new pharmacological hit to counteract the initiation, development and/or progression of prostate cancer. Among the transcription factors regulating cholesterol homeostasis, the nuclear receptors Liver X Receptors (LXRs) control cholesterol uptake and export. Targeting the LXRs offers a new field of investigation to treat cancer. This review highlights the molecular relationships among LXRs, prostate cancer and cholesterol and why LXRs have good chance to be targeted one day in this tumor. LXRs, prostate cancer and cholesterol, more than a "Ménage à trois", The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.

LXR (Liver X Receptors) act as “sensor” proteins that regulate cholesterol uptake, storage, and efflux. LXR signaling is known to influence proliferation of different cell types including human prostatic carcinoma (PCa) cell lines. This study shows that deletion of LXR in mouse fed a high-cholesterol diet recapitulates initial steps of PCa development. Elevation of circulating cholesterol in Lxrαβ-/- double knockout mice results in aberrant cholesterol ester accumulation and prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia. This phenotype is linked to increased expression of the histone methyl transferase EZH2 (Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2), which results in the down-regulation of the tumor suppressors Msmb and Nkx3.1 through increased methylation of lysine 27 of histone H3 (H3K27) on their promoter regions. Altogether, our data provide a novel link between LXR, cholesterol homeostasis, and epigenetic control of tumor suppressor gene expression.

Recent studies underline the implication of Liver X Receptors (LXRs) in several prostate diseases such as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer. In order to understand the molecular mechanisms involved, we derived epithelial cells from dorsal prostate (MPECs) of wild type (WT) or Lxrαβ-/- mice. In the WT MPECs, our results show that LXR activation reduces proliferation and correlates with the modification of the AKT-survival pathway. Moreover, LXRs regulate lipid homeostasis with the regulation of Abca1, Abcg1 and Idol, and, in a lesser extent, Srebp1, Fas and Acc. Conversely cells derived from Lxrαβ-/- mice show a higher basal phosphorylation and consequently activation of the survival/proliferation transduction pathways AKT and MAPK. Altogether, our data point out that the cell model we developed allows deciphering the molecular mechanisms inducing the cell cycle arrest. Besides, we show that activated LXRs regulate AKT and MAPK transduction pathways and demonstrate that LXRs could be good pharmacological targets in prostate disease such as cancer.

Introduction: Oxysterols are implicated in various cellular processes. Among their target proteins, liver X receptors (LXRs) α and β modulate the cell cycle in a large range of cancer cell lines. Besides their role as cholesterol sensors, LXRs are also involved in the proliferation/apoptosis balance regulation in various types of cancers. Areas covered: This review covers oxysterols and derivatives of cholesterol as well as synthetic or natural ligands (agonist/antagonist) of LXRs. Most tumor cell lines are sensitive to LXR activation. Indeed various cancers are concerned such as prostate, breast, glioblastoma, colorectal, and ovary tumors, and leukemia. Expert opinion: Developing the use of LXR ligands in human health, especially in the field of cancer, represents a novel and promising strategy. Despite a wide spectrum of applications, numerous adverse effects of LXR activation need to be solved before genuine clinical trials in humans. Future directions will be based on the engineering of selective LXRs modulators (SLiMs) as already done for nuclear steroid receptors.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia is a nonmalignant enlargement of the prostate that commonly occurs in older men. We show that liver X receptor (Lxr)-α knockout mice (lxrα−/−) develop ventral prostate hypertrophy, correlating with an overaccumulation of secreted proteins in prostatic ducts and an alteration of vesicular trafficking in epithelial cells. In the fluid of the lxrα−/− prostates, spermine binding protein is highly accumulated and shows a 3000-fold increase of its mRNA. This overexpression is mediated by androgen hypersensitivity in lxrα−/− mice, restricted to the ventral prostate. Generation of chimeric recombinant prostates demonstrates that Lxrα is involved in the establishment of the epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in the mouse prostate. Altogether these results point out the crucial role of Lxrα in the homeostasis of the ventral prostate and suggest lxrα−/− mice may be a good model to investigate the molecular mechanisms of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Liver X receptors (LXR) are members of the nuclear receptor family. As activated transcription factors, their putative association with human diseases makes them promising pharmacological targets because of the large potential to develop ligands. LXR are mainly considered as intracellular cholesterol "sensors" whose activation leads to decreased plasma cholesterol. They also modulate numerous physiological functions: fatty acid synthesis and metabolism, glucose homeostasis, steroidogenesis, immunity, and neurological homeostasis. LXR-deficiency in mouse results in several phenotypes mimicking pathological conditions in humans. This review will be focused on the various natural and synthetic LXR agonists and antagonists. Putative clinical targets including atherosclerosis, diabetes, Alzheimer's disease, skin disorders, and cancer will be covered.

Liver X receptors (LXR) are members of the nuclear receptor family. As activated transcription factors, their putative association with human diseases makes them promising pharmacological targets because of the large potential to develop ligands. LXR are mainly considered as intracellular cholesterol "sensors" whose activation leads to decreased plasma cholesterol. They also modulate numerous physiological functions: fatty acid synthesis and metabolism, glucose homeostasis, steroidogenesis, immunity, and neurological homeostasis. LXR-deficiency in mouse results in several phenotypes mimicking pathological conditions in humans. This review will be focused on the various natural and synthetic LXR agonists and antagonists. Putative clinical targets including atherosclerosis, diabetes, Alzheimer's disease, skin disorders, and cancer will be covered.

Oxysterols derive from cholesterol oxidation. They display various biological activities such as regulating cholesterol, fatty acid and glucose homeostasis as well as cell survival/apoptosis balance. Oxysterols display these metabolic and transcriptional activities mainly through their nuclear receptors known as Liver X Receptors (LXRs) alpha and beta. There is accumulating evidence that LXRs are key modulators of prostate cancer cell survival. Hence, LXR activation increases cholesterol efflux and induces a disruption of lipid rafts. The decrease of membrane cholesterol causes a down regulation of AKT survival pathway and consequently apoptosis. Moreover cholesterol is associated with an increased risk of developing aggressive forms of prostate cancer. These data highlight the interest of targeting the LXR-AKT axis in prostate carcinogenesis.

Liver X receptor (LXR) α and LXRβ belong to the nuclear receptor superfamily. For many years, they have been called orphan receptors, as no natural ligand was identified. In the last decade, the LXR natural ligands have been shown to be oxysterols, molecules derived from cholesterol. While these nuclear receptors have been abundantly studied for their roles in the regulation of lipid metabolism, it appears that they also present crucial activities in reproductive organs such as testis and epididymis, as well as prostate. Phenotypic analyses of mice lacking LXRs (lxr−/−) pointed out their physiological activities in the various cells and organs regulating reproductive functions. This review summarizes the impact of LXR-deficiency in male reproduction, highlighting the novel information coming from the phenotypic analyses of lxrα−/−, lxrβ−/− and lxrα;β−/− mice. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Translating nuclear receptor from health to disease.

Introduction: Liver X receptors (LXR) are transcription factors that belong to the nuclear receptor superfamily. Natural derivatives of cholesterol, known as oxysterols, have been identified as agonistic ligands of LXR. They are thus mainly considered to be intracellular cholesterol 'sensors' whose activation leads to decreased plasma cholesterol. Their implication in other physiologic processes currently prevents their use as therapeutic targets, because of potentially deleterious side effects.Areas covered: The various LXR agonists and antagonists, along with the physiological functions of LXR. Putative clinical targets including atherosclerosis, diabetes, Alzheimer's disease, skin disorders, reproductive disorders and cancer.Expert opinion: LXR are promising pharmacological targets because of the high potential to develop ligands owing to the variety of natural or synthetic agonists. Three aspects should be developed to select a LXR-ligand for treatment of human disease: bio-availability; isoform specificity; tissue specificity. This will allow the development of selective liver X modulators (SLiMs). The challenge is to overcome deleterious side effects to establish LXR as new pharmacological targets.

Teamwork between O&M specialist and audiologist led to the development of an Auditory localization training program in order to enhance auditory localization abilities and to optimize independent, safe, and easy travel. The intensive program includes graduated exercises given in a controlled setting using Auditory Localization Evaluation System (SELA). As a pre-test, the program was applied to a new user of bilateral cochlear implants presenting a severe and progressive vision loss. Two training periods were given totaling 21 lessons. At the end of the training, the participant met the success criteria of the most advanced objectives and expressed more confidence in her capabilities. However, pre-training and post-training evaluation results were not conclusive. The pre-test allowed to improve the program structure and to question the program evaluation procedure.

Six adults with symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss, with no visual impairment, were fitted with two digital hearing aids. The participants experimented two fitting strategies (linear vs. Wide Dynamic Range Compression (WDRC) in a double-blind design. After 1-month adaptation period, participants were blindfolded and tested. Experimental measures included a localization assessment in a sound booth and field measurements (alignment with a parallel car, detection distance of a car, distance judgment of a perpendicular car while stationary and moving). Because of varying wind conditions, group data could not be analyzed. Individual data were examined and only large fitting strategy differences were retained. For localization and alignment tasks, no difference between the two fitting strategies was noted except for one subject who showed a substantial number of front–back confusions with WDRC. In the detection distance task, one subject showed a capability of detection larger than 200 m with the linear strategy. The other subjects showed detection distance of about 60 m regardless of the fitting strategy. Even if widespread negative effect cannot be demonstrated from this study, potential risk is not eliminated.