This feasibility and acceptance pilot study for preventing complications of bereavement within the first year post loss recruited 20 adult grievers within 9 months of becoming bereft and assigned consenting subjects to peer supporters trained by a non-profit bereavement support organization for weekly or bi-weekly telephone-based peer support until month 13 post-loss. Subjects who met DSM-5 criteria for major depressive disorder or showed an Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG) score exceeding 19, 6 months or more post loss, were assigned to 12 to 16 weeks of interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) with an experienced therapist. Eight and six subjects completed the protocol assigned to peer support and IPT, respectively, with pre/post Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores of 5.38 (2.45) versus 3.25 (4.13) (p = 0.266) and 16.67 (7.17) versus 8.40 (5.73) (p =0.063); and pre/post ICG scores of 12.50 (4.72) versus 5.00 (2.51) (p = 0.016) and 35.17 (5.12) versus 8.4 (5.73) (p = 0.063). Implications of this two-tiered model of early intervention for preventing complications of grief are discussed.

OBJECTIVE:This study explored whether older black and white adults with major depressive disorder differed in rates of remission or attrition during open-label treatment with venlafaxine and supportive care. METHODS:A total of 47 black (10%) and 412 white (90%) adults age ≥60 were treated with open-label venlafaxine extended-release (≤300 mg per day) for 12-14 weeks during the initial phase of an multisite, randomized, placebo-controlled augmentation trial. Participants were help-seeking older adults with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder (single or recurrent episode) referred from specialty clinics, primary care practices, advertisements, and research programs. Remission was defined as a Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score of ≤10 for two consecutive assessments at the end of 12 weeks. Kaplan-Meier curves displayed time to dropout and time to initial remission. Cox proportional hazards models assessed differences in attrition and remission rates. RESULTS:Black participants had greater baseline general medical comorbidity, worse physical health-related quality of life, and poorer cognitive function than white participants. White participants were more likely to have received an adequate trial of antidepressant and psychotherapy before study entry. Baseline depression severity, depression duration, age at onset, and recurrence history did not differ between groups. The groups had similar final doses of venlafaxine and similar rates of attrition and remission. Side-effect profiles were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS:Despite greater medical comorbidity, lower cognitive function, and less adequate prior exposure to antidepressant treatment and psychotherapy, black participants were no more likely to discontinue antidepressant pharmacotherapy and experienced a rate of remission comparable to white participants.

Background Treatment-resistant major depression is common and potentially life-threatening in elderly people, in whom little is known about the benefits and risks of augmentation pharmacotherapy. We aimed to assess whether aripiprazole is associated with a higher probability of remission than is placebo.Methods We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at three centres in the USA and Canada to test the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole augmentation for adults aged older than 60 years with treatment-resistant depression (Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] score of >= 15). Patients who did not achieve remission during a pre-trial with venlafaxine extended-release (150-300 mg/day) were randomly assigned (1: 1) to the addition of aripiprazole (target dose 10 mg [maximum 15 mg] daily) daily or placebo for 12 weeks. The computer-generated randomisation was done in blocks and stratified by site. Only the database administrator and research pharmacists had knowledge of treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was remission, defined as an MADRS score of 10 or less (and at least 2 points below the score at the start of the randomised phase) at both of the final two consecutive visits, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00892047.Findings From July 20, 2009, to Dec 30, 2013, we recruited 468 eligible participants, 181 (39%) of whom did not remit and were randomly assigned to aripiprazole (n=91) or placebo (n=90). A greater proportion of participants in the aripiprazole group achieved remission than did those in the placebo group (40 [44%] vs 26 [29%] participants; odds ratio [OR] 2.0 [95% CI 1.1-3.7], p=0.03; number needed to treat [NNT] 6.6 [95% CI 3.5-81.8]). Akathisia was the most common adverse effect of aripiprazole (reported in 24 [26%] of 91 participants on aripiprazole vs 11 [12%] of 90 on placebo). Compared with placebo, aripiprazole was also associated with more Parkinsonism (15 [17%] of 86 vs two [2%] of 81 participants), but not with treatment-emergent suicidal ideation (13 [21%] of 61 vs 19 [29%] of 65 participants) or other measured safety variables.Interpretation In adults aged 60 years or older who do not achieve remission from depression with a first-line antidepressant, the addition of aripiprazole is effective in achieving and sustaining remission. Tolerability concerns include the potential for akathisia and Parkinsonism.

OBJECTIVE The study objective was to assess the efficacy of problem-solving therapy for primary care (PST-PC) for preventing episodes of major depression and mitigating depressive symptoms of older black and white adults. The comparison group received dietary coaching. METHODS A total of 247 participants (90 blacks, 154 whites, and three Asians) with subsyndromal depressive symptoms were recruited into a randomized depression prevention trial that compared effects of individually delivered PST-PC and dietary coaching on time to major depressive episode and level of depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory) over two years. Cumulative intervention time averaged 5.5-6.0 hours in each study arm. RESULTS The two groups did not differ significantly in time to major depressive episodes, and incidence of such episodes was low (blacks, N=8, 9%; whites, N=13, 8%), compared with published rates of 20%-25% over one year among persons with subsyndromal symptoms and receiving care as usual. Participants also showed a mean decrease of 4 points in depressive symptoms, sustained over two years. Despite greater burden of depression risk factors among blacks, no significant differences from whites were found in the primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS Both PST-PC and dietary coaching are potentially effective in protecting older black and white adults with subsyndromal depressive symptoms from developing episodes of major depression over two years. Absent a control for concurrent usual care, this conclusion is preliminary. If confirmed, both interventions hold promise as scalable, safe, nonstigmatizing interventions for delaying or preventing episodes of major depression in the nation's increasingly diverse older population.

Objective: The study objective was to assess the efficacy of problemsolving therapy for primary care (PST-PC) for preventing episodes of major depression and mitigating depressive symptoms of older black and white adults. The comparisongroupreceived dietarycoaching.Methods:A total of 247 participants (90 blacks, 154 whites, and three Asians) with subsyndromal depressive symptoms were recruited into a randomized depression prevention trial that compared effects of individually delivered PST-PC and dietary coaching on time to major depressive episode and level of depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory) over two years. Cumulative intervention time averaged 5.526.0 hours in each study arm. Results: The two groups did not differ significantly in time to major depressive episodes, and incidence of such episodes was low (blacks, N=8, 9%; whites, N=13, 8%), compared with published rates of 20%–25% over one year among persons with subsyndromal symptoms and receiving care as usual. Participants also showed a mean decrease of 4 points in depressive symptoms, sustained over two years. Despite greater burden of depression risk factors among blacks, no significant differences from whites were found in the primary outcome. Conclusions:Both PST-PC and dietary coaching are potentially effective in protecting older black and white adults with subsyndromal depressive symptoms from developing episodes of major depression over two years. Absent a control for concurrent usual care, this conclusion is preliminary. If confirmed, both interventions hold promise as scalable, safe, nonstigmatizing interventions for delaying or preventing episodes of major depression in the nation’s increasingly diverse older population. (Psychiatric Services 65:765–773, 2014; doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300216)

CONTEXT Cognitive impairment in late-life depression is a core feature of the illness. OBJECTIVE To test whether donepezil hydrochloride and antidepressant therapy is superior to placebo and antidepressant therapy in improving cognitive performance and instrumental activities of daily living and in reducing recurrences of depression over 2 years of maintenance treatment. DESIGN Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled maintenance trial. SETTING University clinic. PARTICIPANTS One hundred thirty older adults aged 65 years and older with recently remitted major depression. INTERVENTIONS Random assignment to maintenance antidepressant pharmacotherapy and donepezil or to maintenance antidepressant pharmacotherapy and placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Global neuropsychological performance, cognitive instrumental activities of daily living, and recurrent depression. RESULTS Donepezil and antidepressant therapy temporarily improved global cognition (treatment × time interaction, F₂,₂₁₆ = 3.78; P = .03), but effect sizes were small (Cohen d = 0.27, group difference at 1 year). A marginal benefit to cognitive instrumental activities of daily living was also observed (treatment × time interaction, F₂,₁₃₇ = 2.94; P = .06). The donepezil group was more likely than the placebo group to experience recurrent major depression (35% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 24%-46%] vs 19% [95% CI, 9%-29%], respectively; log-rank χ² = 3.97; P = .05; hazard ratio = 2.09 [95% CI, 1.00-4.41]). Post hoc subgroup analyses showed that of 57 participants with mild cognitive impairment, 3 of 30 participants (10% [95% CI, 0%-21%]) receiving donepezil and 9 of 27 participants (33% [95% CI, 16%-51%]) receiving placebo had a conversion to dementia over 2 years (Fisher exact test, P = .05). The mild cognitive impairment subgroup had recurrence rates of major depression of 44% with donepezil vs 12% with placebo (likelihood ratio = 4.91; P = .03). The subgroup with normal cognition (n = 73) showed no benefit with donepezil and no increase in recurrence of major depression. CONCLUSIONS Whether a cholinesterase inhibitor should be used as augmentation in the maintenance treatment of late-life depression depends on a careful weighing of risks and benefits in those with mild cognitive impairment. In cognitively intact patients, donepezil appears to have no clear benefit for preventing progression to mild cognitive impairment or dementia or for preventing recurrence of depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00177671.

More than half of the older adults respond only partially to first‐line antidepressant pharmacotherapy. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that a depression‐specific psychotherapy, Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT), when used adjunctively with escitalopram, would lead to a higher rate of remission and faster resolution of symptoms in partial responders than escitalopram with depression care management (DCM).

ABSTRACT Background: To compare the frequencies of risk factors, we describe risks for depression as a function of race among consecutively admitted participants in a randomized clinical trial of indicated depression prevention in later life. Methods: Seventy-two black and 143 white participants were screened for risk factors for depression. Results: Black participants were more likely to have fewer years of education and lower household income. They were more likely to be obese, live alone, experience functional disability, have a history of alcohol and drug abuse, and have lower scores on the Mini-mental State Examination and the Executive Interview (EXIT). White participants were not found to have greater prevalence or higher mean score on any risk factor. On average, black participants experienced approximately one more risk factor than white participants (t(213) = 3.32, p = 0.0011). Conclusions: In our sample, black participants had higher frequencies of eight risk factors for depression and a greater mean number of risk factors compared to white participants.

OBJECTIVE The authors detail the public health need for depression prevention research and the decisions made in designing an experiment testing problem solving therapy as "indicated" preventive intervention for high-risk older adults with subsyndromal depression. Special attention is given to the recruitment of African Americans because of well-documented inequalities in mental health services and depression treatment outcomes between races. METHODS A total of 306 subjects (half white, half African American) with scores of 16 or higher on the Center for Epidemiological Studies of Depression Scale, but with no history of major depressive disorder in the past 12 months, are being recruited and randomly assigned to either problem solving therapy-primary care or to a dietary education control condition. Time to, and rate of, incident episodes of major depressive disorder are to be modeled using survival analysis. Level of depressive symptoms will be analyzed via a mixed models approach. RESULTS Twenty-two subjects have been recruited into the study, and to date eight have completed the randomly assigned intervention and postintervention assessment. Four of 22 have exited after developing major depressive episodes. None have complained about study procedures or demands. Implementation in a variety of community settings is going well. CONCLUSION The data collected to date support the feasibility of translating from epidemiology to RCT design and implementation of empirical depression prevention research in later life.

Declaration of interest E.J.L., B.H.M.,B.G.P.,M.D.M. and C.F.R. have received support and/orconsult for (one ormore of ):Forest Laboratories,Pfizer Inc.,Johnson & Johnson Co.,Bristol-Myers Squibb,Eli Lilly,GlaxoSmithKline, Lundbeck,Janssen Pharmaceutica, and Sepracor (details in Acknowledgements). Comorbid anxiety is common in depressive disorders, both in middle and in later life. In community samples of younger adults with depression, the point prevalence of comorbid anxiety disorders ranged from 33% (Flint, 1994) to 51% (Kessler et al, 1996), with a 46% point prevalence in a clinical sample (Fava et al, 2004). In community samples of older adults with latelife depression, the point prevalence of comorbid anxiety disorders ranged from 26% (Ben-Arie et al, 1987) to 48% (Beekman et al, 2000). In clinical samples of older patients with late-life depression, comorbid anxiety disorders were diagnosed in 3% to 65% (Parmalee et al, 1993; Mulsant et al, 1996; Lenze et al, 2000). Beyond the high rates of coexistence, comorbid anxiety has been often cited as a clinically relevant problem owing to its impact on acute treatment response in late-life depression. Thus, several studies have found that greater severity of anxiety symptoms is associated with an increased risk of withdrawal from treatment (Fawcett, 1997; Flint & Rifat, 1997a), a decreased response to acute antidepressant treatment (Fawcett, 1997; Flint & Rifat, 1997a; Steffens & McQuoid, 2005), and a longer time to both response (Mulsant et al, 1996; Dew et al, 1997; Lenze et al, 2003) and remission (Clayton et al, 1991; Alexopoulos et al, 2005). Although the impact of anxiety on response and recurrence of major depression has been previously studied extensively in general adult populations, its relevance to long-term treatment response in late-life depression has received much less attention (Lebowitz et al, 1997; Charney et al, 2003) and has not been examined in a controlled maintenance trial. Maintenance outcomes in late-life depression and the factors that moderate those outcomes are critical, given the brittle nature of response in this age group (Reynolds & Lebowitz, 1999; Reynolds et al, 2006). To our knowledge, the only published data addressing these long-term outcomes were obtained during a 2-year naturalistic follow-up study. In this uncontrolled study, pre-treatment anxiety symptoms were not related to time to recurrence during 2 years of open pharmacotherapy trial with nortriptyline (Flint & Rifat, 1997b). Thus, given the high recurrence rate of late-life depression (Zis et al, 1980) and the increased morbidity and mortality risks associated with this disorder (Ganguli et al, 1993, 2002; Reynolds et al, 1994), as well as the lack of controlled data regarding the impact of pre-treatment anxiety on its long-term treatment, further examination of anxiety as a predictor not only of response but of recurrence would greatly benefit clinicians in planning treatment. Accordingly, we conducted an analysis to assess whether pre-treatment comorbid anxiety predicts treatment outcomes during both acute and maintenance treatment of major depression in old age. Our hypothesis was that greater pre-treatment severity of anxiety symptoms would predict poor treatment outcome, including both a longer time to response during acute treatment, and an increased rate of – and shorter time to – recurrence during maintenance treatment.

BackgroundComorbid anxiety is common in depressive disorders in both middle and late life, and it affects response to antidepressant treatment.AimsTo examine whether anxiety symptoms predict acute and maintenance (2 years) treatment response in late-life depression.MethodData were drawn from a randomised double-blind study of pharmacotherapy and interpersonal psychotherapy for patients age 70 years and over with major depression. Anxiety symptoms were measured using the Brief Symptom Inventory. Survival analysis tested the effect of pre-treatment anxiety on response and recurrence.ResultsPatients with greater pre-treatment anxiety took longer to respond to treatment and had higher rates of recurrence. Actuarial recurrence rates were 29% (pharmacotherapy, lower anxiety), 58% (pharmacotherapy, higher anxiety), 54% (placebo, lower anxiety) and 81% (placebo, higher anxiety).ConclusionsImproved identification and management of anxiety in late-life depression are needed to achieve response and stabilise recovery.

Objective: Few data are available concerning the utility of augmentation in late-life depression treatment. The authors examined likelihood, speed, and predictors of recovery in older adults receiving augmentation pharmacotherapy after inadequate response to standardized treatment with paroxetine plus interpersonal psychotherapy.Method: Depression levels were monitored during open treatment in 195 adults age 70 or older. Patients were grouped by whether they required augmentation (bupropion, nortriptyline, or lithium) and compared on likelihood, time, and predictors of recovery.Results: Augmentation was required for 105 patients (53.8%) because of inadequate treatment response (N=77) or response followed by relapse (N=28). Of these patients, 69 received augmentation and 36 did not (primarily because of consent withdrawal or comorbid medical conditions). Patients receiving augmentation showed lower recovery rates than patients never requiring augmentation: recovery occurred in 50.0% of patients receiving it because of inadequate response, 66.7% of those receiving it after early relapse, and 86.7% of patients never requiring augmentation. Patients receiving augmentation because of inadequate response recovered more slowly, with modestly more side effects than other patients. Greater medical burden and anxiety predicted slower recovery.Conclusions: Despite a lower likelihood of recovery in elderly people receiving augmentation, the recovery by over one-half of such patients suggests the value of augmentation for those able to tolerate it. Need for augmentation presages slower recovery in patients showing initial inadequate response; those requiring it after early relapse recovered more quickly. Strategies to further improve the likelihood and speed of recovery after initial treatment failure are needed.

Objective Approximately half of older patients treated for major depressive disorder (MDD) do not achieve symptomatic remission and functional recovery with first-line pharmacotherapy. This study aims to characterize sociodemographic, clinical, and neuropsychologic correlates of full, partial, and non-response to escitalopram monotherapy of unipolar MDD in later life.Methods One hundred and seventy-five patients aged 60 and older were assessed at baseline on demographic variables, depression severity, hopelessness, anxiety, cognitive functioning, co-existing medical illness burden, social support, and quality of life (disability). Subjects received 10mg/d of open-label escitalopram and were divided into full (n =55; 31%), partial (n = 75; 42.9%), and non-responder (n = 45; 25.7%) groups based on Hamilton depression scores at week 6. Univariate followed by multivariate analyses tested for differences between the three groups.Results Non-responders to treatment were found to be more severely depressed and anxious at baseline than both full and partial responders, more disabled, and with lower self-esteem than full responders. In general partial responders resembled full responders more than they resernbled non-responders. In multivariate models, more severe anxiety symptoms (both psychological and somatic) and lower self-esteem predicted worse response status at 6 weeks.Conclusion Among treatment-seeking elderly persons with MDD, higher anxiety symptoms and lower self-esteem predict poorer response after six weeks of escitalopram treatment. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to describe the correlates of prior antidepressant exposure and its association with response to protocolized treatment in older patients with major depression. METHODS:Based on their prior antidepressant treatment exposure, 193 elderly patients with a major depressive episode were divided into three groups: those with no prior treatment for their current episode (not treated [TN]), those with antidepressant trials of inadequate dose or duration ("treatment-inadequate" [TI]), and those with at least one adequate trial but persisting depression ("treatment-resistant" [TR]). All patients then received protocolized treatment with interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) and paroxetine plus pharmacologic augmentation if needed. The demographic, clinical, and outcome information were compared among these three groups. RESULTS:Approximately one-third of the patients referred to the study had been adequately treated (TR), one-third had been inadequately treated (TI), and one-third were not treated for the current episode (TN). Treatment completion rates and reasons for dropping out did not differ statistically among TR, TI, and TN patients. TR patients took longer to respond (13.0 weeks) than either TI or TN patients (7.6 and 8.0 weeks, respectively). TR and TI patients had lower response rates (67% and 71%) than TN patients (86%). CONCLUSIONS:Prior treatment exposure is an important correlate of course and outcome in late-life depression. Most TR and TI patients eventually respond, but TR patients may require more intensive and longer courses of treatment than TI and TN patients.

Background: To determine the optimal duration of an antidepressant trial in elderly patients, the authors examined the probability of eventually responding to treatment based on early improvement. Methods: Four hundred seventy-two elderly patients with major depression (nonpsychotic, nonbipolar) were treated under protocolized conditions for up to 12 weeks and assessed weekly with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. The probability of full response after 12 weeks of treatment was calculated in patients who had not fully responded after periods of treatment that lasted for 4 to 10 weeks. Results: Most of the patients who had shown a partial improvement after 4 weeks of treatment became full responders after 4 or more additional weeks of treatment. By contrast, only a few of those who were nonresponders became full responders even after up to 8 additional weeks of treatment. Conclusions: After 4 weeks of treatment, it is possible to reliably identify a subgroup of elderly patients with depression who are more likely to benefit from a change in their treatment than from a few additional weeks of treatment with the same agent.

BACKGROUND Elderly patients with major depression, including those having a first episode, are at high risk for recurrence of depression, disability, and death. METHODS We tested the efficacy of maintenance paroxetine and monthly interpersonal psychotherapy in patients 70 years of age or older who had depression (55 percent of whom were having a first episode) in a 2-by-2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Among patients with a response to treatment with paroxetine and psychotherapy, 116 were randomly assigned to one of four maintenance-treatment programs (either paroxetine or placebo combined with either monthly psychotherapy or clinical-management sessions) for two years or until the recurrence of major depression. Clinical-management sessions, conducted by the same nurses, social workers, and psychologists who provided psychotherapy, involved discussion of symptoms. RESULTS Major depression recurred within two years in 35 percent of the patients receiving paroxetine and psychotherapy, 37 percent of those receiving paroxetine and clinical-management sessions, 68 percent of those receiving placebo and psychotherapy, and 58 percent of those receiving placebo and clinical-management sessions (P=0.02). After adjustment for the effect of psychotherapy, the relative risk of recurrence among those receiving placebo was 2.4 times (95 percent confidence interval, 1.4 to 4.2) that among those receiving paroxetine. The number of patients needed to be treated with paroxetine to prevent one recurrence was 4 (95 percent confidence interval, 2.3 to 10.9). Patients with fewer and less severe coexisting medical conditions (such as hypertension or cardiac disease) received greater benefit from paroxetine (P=0.03 for the interaction between treatment with paroxetine and baseline severity of medical illness). CONCLUSIONS Patients 70 years of age or older with major depression who had a response to initial treatment with paroxetine and psychotherapy were less likely to have recurrent depression if they received two years of maintenance therapy with paroxetine. Monthly maintenance psychotherapy did not prevent recurrent depression. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00178100.).

OBJECTIVE:The authors investigated the influence of body pain on 1) time to treatment response and 2) suicidal ideation, in late-life depression. They hypothesized that higher levels of body pain would predict a longer time to and lower likelihood of response, and increased levels of suicidal ideation. METHODS:Subjects (N=187) were older adult outpatients (age > or =69 years), with current episodes of major depression, who were openly treated with paroxetine up to 40 mg daily and weekly interpersonal psychotherapy. Response was defined as 3 consecutive weeks of Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression at < or =10. Body pain was measured with the Bodily Pain Index of the SF-36 quality-of-life assessment. Authors used survival-analysis models on the responder sample to test the effect of body pain on response, after controlling for severity of depression. RESULTS:Overall response rate was 75.4%. Nonresponders reported more severe pain at baseline. After covarying for severity of baseline depression, no effect was found for physical pain on time-to-response or degree of suicidality. Bodily pain remained stable during acute treatment for responders, independent of depression response to combination psychotherapy and antidepressant treatment. CONCLUSIONS:Older adult patients with higher levels of physical pain can still respond to antidepressant treatment; however, reported bodily pain may be associated with a more difficult-to-treat depression.

OBJECTIVE:Authors tested the hypothesis that one night of total sleep deprivation (TSD) would accelerate antidepressant response to paroxetine, as compared with TSD+placebo (PBO) and paroxetine-alone, in late-life major depression.METHODS:Eighty elderly outpatients with current episodes of non-psychotic, non-bipolar major depression were randomly assigned to one of three treatment conditions: TSD+paroxetine (N = 27), TSD + PBO (N = 27), and paroxetine-only (N = 26). Primary outcome was percentage of subjects in each condition who demonstrated early response (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores [Ham-D: 17-item] of < or = 10) or remission (score of < or = 7) on Day 14.RESULTS:Response rates after 14 days were 22% in subjects randomly assigned to the TSD + paroxetine condition, 41% in TSD + PBO, and 46% in paroxetine alone. Remission rates after 14 days were 11% in TSD+paroxetine, 22% in TSD + PBO, and 38% in paroxetine. After adjusting for baseline depression severity, there were no statistically significant differences in response or remission rates.CONCLUSION:Contrary to the study hypothesis, one night of total sleep deprivation did not accelerate onset of antidepressant response to paroxetine pharmacotherapy of late-life depression. The data suggest, rather, that the two interventions might have counteracted each other.

OBJECTIVE:The authors sought to determine the feasibility of treating elderly adults with bipolar disorder under standardized-treatment conditions.METHODS:Thirty-one patients age 60 and older with bipolar disorder were treated in standardized pathways. Mood state was checked at each study visit with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 item (Ham-D-17) and the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS).RESULTS:Defining "well days" as both Ham-D and YMRS scores of <or=10, the mean percentage of well days was 72.5 (range: 0%-100%) over study participation.CONCLUSIONS:Treating older adults with bipolar disorder under standardized treatment is feasible and is associated with low symptom levels. However, most older adults with bipolar disorder do not experience sustained recovery.

Objective To explore clinical and treatment-response variability in late-onset vs early-onset non-bipolar, non-psychotic major depression.Methods We grouped patients from alate-life depression treatment study according to illness-course characteristics: those with early-onset, recurrent depression (n = 59), late-onset, recurrent depression (n = 27), and late-onset, single-episode depression (n = 95). Early-onset was defined as having a first lifetime episode of major depression at age 59 or earlier; late-onset was defined as having a first episode of major depression at age 60 or later. We characterized the three groups of patients with respect to baseline demographic, neuropsychological, and clinical characteristics, use of augmentation pharmacotherapy to achieve response, and treatment outcomes.Results Rates of response, remission, relapse, and termination were similar in all three groups; however, patients with late-onset, recurrent major depression took longer to respond to treatment than those with late-onset, single-episode depression (12 weeks vs 8 weeks) and had more cognitive and functional impairment. Additionally, patients with recurrent depression (whether early or late) were more likely to require pharmacotherapy augmentation to achieve response than patients with a single lifetime episode.Conclusion Late-onset, recurrent depression takes longer to respond to treatment than late-onset single-episode depression and is more strongly associated with cognitive and functional impairment. Further study of biological, neuropsychologic, and psychosocial correlates of late-onset, recurrent depression is needed. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.