Pulmonary nodules are classified as solid or subsolid, with subsolid nodules further classified as part-solid or pure ground-glass. Management strategies differ according to the type of nodule. A comparison of current and previous imaging studies, when available, is essential to assess the risk of the nodule being malignant. Solid nodules that have been stable for 2 years are considered to be benign, whereas subsolid nodules require a longer period of stability to be considered benign. Prediction models to stratify the risk of the nodule being malignant can be used to guide the management of solid nodules. Computed tomographic (CT) surveillance is indicated for low-risk nodules; positron-emission tomography-CT, biopsy, or both for intermediate-risk nodules; and surgical resection for selected high-risk nodules. Subsolid nodules are often slower growing than solid nodules but are associated with a higher risk of being malignant, especially if a solid component develops or progressively enlarges. Biopsy methods include transthoracic needle biopsy and navigational bronchoscopy. Optimal overall management balances timely diagnosis in persons who have cancer with the avoidance of unnecessary invasive procedures in persons who have benign disease.
BACKGROUND:RAS mutations, as a group, are the most common oncogenic drivers of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and they occur in approximately 30% of patients. Whether daraxonrasib (RMC-6236) - an oral RAS(ON) multiselective, tri-complex inhibitor of guanosine triphosphate-bound mutant and wild-type RAS protein isoforms - is safe and effective in patients with RAS-mutant NSCLC is unknown. METHODS:In this phase 1-2, multicenter, dose-escalation and dose-expansion study of daraxonrasib, we enrolled patients with previously treated advanced RAS-mutant NSCLC and administered daraxonrasib in doses of 10 to 400 mg orally once daily in 21-day cycles. The primary end point was safety. Secondary end points included investigator-assessed objective response (complete or partial response) and the duration of response, with response assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. RESULTS:As of the data-cutoff date of July 21, 2025, a total of 136 patients with NSCLC who had been enrolled and treated with daraxonrasib at doses of 300 mg or less had been evaluated for safety and efficacy. Adverse events of any grade occurring with a dose of 300 mg or less, regardless of attribution, were reported in 99% of the patients, with rash, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and mucositis or stomatitis occurring in at least 30% of patients. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were reported in 54% of the patients, with pneumonia (in 10%), diarrhea (in 9%), rash (in 8%), and anemia (in 5%) occurring in at least 5% of patients; four grade 5 adverse events occurred. The percentage of patients who had an objective response was 31% with daraxonrasib at a dose of 120 mg or less, 34% at doses of 160 to 220 mg, and 37% at a dose of 300 mg. CONCLUSIONS:Among patients with previously treated metastatic RAS-mutant NSCLC receiving daraxonrasib at a dose of 300 mg or less daily, 54% had adverse events of grade 3 or higher, and antitumor activity was reported in more than 30%. (Funded by Revolution Medicines; RMC-6236-001 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05379985.).
BACKGROUND:Induction chemotherapy has long been a key component of curative therapy for fit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), despite its frequently severe side effects and substantial health care utilization. For patients who are ineligible for induction chemotherapy, hypomethylating therapy plus venetoclax is the standard treatment owing to its efficacy and side-effect profile. METHODS:In this multicenter, phase 2 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, previously untreated adults with AML who were eligible for induction chemotherapy to receive either azacitidine plus venetoclax or induction chemotherapy. Patients with core binding factor fusions, mutations in the gene encoding FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3), or mutations in the gene encoding nucleophosmin-1 (NPM1; unless the patient was ≥60 years of age) were excluded. The primary end point was event-free survival. RESULTS:A total of 172 patients underwent randomization, with 86 patients assigned to each group. The median age of the patients was 64 years. A total of 72% of the patients had adverse-risk disease according to the European LeukemiaNet 2022 classification. At a median follow-up of 21.9 months, the median event-free survival was 14.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.4 to 24.4) in the azacitidine-venetoclax group, as compared with 6.2 months (95% CI, 4.1 to 10.1) in the induction chemotherapy group, corresponding to a hazard ratio for event or death of 0.57 (95% CI, 0.39 to 0.84; P = 0.002 by the stratified log-rank test). Infection of grade 3 or higher occurred in 28% of the patients (95% CI, 19 to 39) receiving azacitidine-venetoclax and in 41% of those (95% CI, 30 to 52) receiving induction chemotherapy; hemorrhage of grade 3 or higher occurred in 2% (95% CI, 0.3 to 8) and 12% (95% CI, 6 to 20), respectively. CONCLUSIONS:In this phase 2, randomized trial, azacitidine-venetoclax therapy led to significantly longer event-free survival than induction chemotherapy among induction-eligible patients with AML. (Funded by AbbVie and others; PARADIGM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04801797.).
