In vertebrates, SMARCAD1 participates in transcriptional regulation, heterochromatin maintenance, DNA repair, and replication. The molecular basis underlying its involvement in these processes is not well understood. We identified the RNA polymerase III general transcription factor TFIIIC as an interaction partner of native SMARCAD1 in mouse and human models using endogenous co-immunoprecipitations. TFIIIC has dual functionality, acting as a general transcription factor and as a genome organizer separating chromatin domains. We found that its partnership with SMARCAD1 is conserved across different mammalian cell types, from somatic to pluripotent cells. Using purified proteins, we confirmed that their interaction is direct. A gene expression analysis suggested that SMARCAD1 is dispensable for TFIIIC function as an RNA polymerase III transcription factor in mouse ESCs. The distribution of TFIIIC and SMARCAD1 in the ESC genome is distinct, and unlike in yeast, SMARCAD1 is not enriched at active tRNA genes. Further analysis of SMARCAD1-binding partners in pluripotent and differentiated mammalian cells reveals that SMARCAD1 associates with several factors that have key regulatory roles in chromatin organization, such as cohesin, laminB, and DDX5. Together, our work suggests for the first time that the SMARCAD1 enzyme participates in genome organization in mammalian nuclei through interactions with architectural proteins.

The RNA methylation of adenosine at the N6-position (m6A) has attracted significant attention because of its abundance and dynamic nature. It accounts for more than 80% of all RNA modifications present in bacteria and eukaryotes and regulates crucial aspects of RNA biology and gene expression in numerous biological processes. The majority of m6A found in mammals is deposited by a multicomponent complex formed between methyltransferase-like (METTL) proteins METTL3 and METTL14. In the last few years, the list of m6A writers has grown, resulting in an expansion of our understanding of the importance of m6A and the methylation machinery. The characterization of the less familiar family member METTL16 has uncovered a new function of the m6A methylation apparatus, namely the fine-tuning of the cellular levels of the major methyl donor S-adenosylmethionine (SAM). METTL16 achieves this by adjusting the levels of the enzyme that synthesizes SAM in direct response to fluctuations in the SAM availability. This review summarizes recent progress made in understanding how METTL16 can sense and relay metabolic information and considers the wider implications. A brief survey highlights similarities and differences between METTL16 and the better-known METTL3/14 complex, followed by a discussion of the target specificity, modes of action and potential roles of METTL16.

Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) represent abundant retrotransposon families that have coevolved in the mammalian genome for millions of years. Although long considered junk DNA, it is becoming increasingly evident that ERVs are likely to play important roles during normal development. Retroviral sequences have been coopted to create new regulatory elements, used by cells to rewire their gene expression patterns. On the other hand, ERVs are capable of retrotransposition into new genomic locations, thus carrying mutagenic potential. As a result, specialized host regulatory mechanisms have evolved to control ERV expression and activity. In this review, we discuss the exquisite regulation of ERVs in pluripotent cells and throughout early development in human and mouse.

Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) can confer benefits to their host but present a threat to genome integrity if not regulated correctly. Here we identify the SWI/SNF-like remodeler SMARCAD1 as a key factor in the control of ERVs in embryonic stem cells. SMARCAD1 is enriched at ERV subfamilies class I and II, particularly at active intracisternal A-type particles (IAPs), where it preserves repressive histone methylation marks. Depletion of SMARCAD1 results in de-repression of IAPs and adjacent genes. Recruitment of SMARCAD1 to ERVs is dependent on KAP1, a central component of the silencing machinery. SMARCAD1 and KAP1 occupancy at ERVs is co-dependent and requires the ATPase function of SMARCAD1. Our findings uncover a role for the enzymatic activity of SMARCAD1 in cooperating with KAP1 to silence ERVs. This reveals ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling as an integral step in retrotransposon regulation in stem cells and advances our understanding of the mechanisms driving heterochromatin establishment.

Chromatin in embryonic stem cells (ESCs) differs markedly from that in somatic cells, with ESCs exhibiting a more open chromatin configuration. Accordingly, ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes are important regulators of ESC homeostasis. Depletion of the remodeler SMARCAD1, an ATPase of the SNF2 family, has been shown to affect stem cell state, but the mechanistic explanation for this effect is unknown. Here, we set out to gain further insights into the function of SMARCAD1 in mouse ESCs. We identified KRAB-associated protein 1 (KAP1) as the stoichiometric binding partner of SMARCAD1 in ESCs. We found that this interaction occurs on chromatin and that SMARCAD1 binds to different classes of KAP1 target genes, including zinc finger protein (ZFP) and imprinted genes. We also found that the RING B-box coiled-coil (RBCC) domain in KAP1 and the proximal coupling of ubiquitin conjugation to ER degradation (CUE) domain in SMARCAD1 mediate their direct interaction. Of note, retention of SMARCAD1 in the nucleus depended on KAP1 in both mouse ESCs and human somatic cells. Mutations in the CUE1 domain of SMARCAD1 perturbed the binding to KAP1 in vitro and in vivo. Accordingly, an intact CUE1 domain was required for tethering this remodeler to the nucleus. Moreover, mutation of the CUE1 domain compromised SMARCAD1 binding to KAP1 target genes. Taken together, our results reveal a mechanism that localizes SMARCAD1 to genomic sites through the interaction of SMARCAD1's CUE1 motif with KAP1.

*Correspondence to: Jacqueline E. Mermoud; Email: jacqueline.mermoud@babraham.ac.uk Disruption of chromatin during replication poses a major challenge to the maintenance and integrity of genome organization. It creates the need to accurately reconstruct the chromatin landscape following DNA duplication but there is little mechanistic understanding of how chromatin based modifications are restored on newly synthesized DNA. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling activities serve multiple roles during replication and recent work underscores their requirement in the maintenance of proper chromatin organization. A new component of chromatin replication, the SWI/SNF-like chromatin remodeler SMARCAD1, acts at replication sites to facilitate deacetylation of newly assembled histones. Deacetylation is a pre-requisite for the restoration of epigenetic signatures in heterochromatin regions following replication. In this way, SMARCAD1, in concert with histone modifying activities and transcriptional repressors, reinforces epigenetic instructions to ensure that silenced loci are correctly perpetuated in each replication cycle. The emerging concept is that remodeling of nucleosomes is an early event imperative to promote the re-establishment of histone modifications following DNA replication.

Epigenetic marks such as posttranslational histone modifications specify the functional states of underlying DNA sequences, though how they are maintained after their disruption during DNA replication remains a critical question. We identify the mammalian SWI/SNF-like protein SMARCAD1 as a key factor required for the re-establishment of repressive chromatin. The ATPase activity of SMARCAD1 is necessary for global deacetylation of histones H3/H4. In this way, SMARCAD1 promotes methylation of H3K9, the establishment of heterochromatin, and faithful chromosome segregation. SMARCAD1 associates with transcriptional repressors including KAP1, histone deacetylases HDAC1/2 and the histone methyltransferase G9a/GLP and modulates the interaction of HDAC1 and KAP1 with heterochromatin. SMARCAD1 directly interacts with PCNA, a central component of the replication machinery, and is recruited to sites of DNA replication. Our findings suggest that chromatin remodeling by SMARCAD1 ensures that silenced loci, such as pericentric heterochromatin, are correctly perpetuated.

Disruption of chromatin organization during replication poses a major challenge to the maintenance and integrity of genome organization. It creates the need to accurately reconstruct the chromatin landscape following DNA duplication but there is little mechanistic understanding of how chromatin based modifications are restored on newly synthesized DNA. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling activities serve multiple roles during replication and recent work underscores their requirement in the maintenance of proper chromatin organization. A new component of chromatin replication, the SWI/SNF-like chromatin remodeler SMARCAD1, acts at replication sites to facilitate deacetylation of newly assembled histones. Deacetylation is a pre-requisite for the restoration of epigenetic signatures in heterochromatin regions following replication. In this way, SMARCAD1, in concert with histone modifying activities and transcriptional repressors, reinforces epigenetic instructions to ensure that silenced loci are correctly perpetuated in each replication cycle. The emerging concept is that remodeling of nucleosomes is an early event imperative to promote the re-establishment of histone modifications following DNA replication.

J. Neurochem. (2010) 114 , 832–842. Abstract Epidemiological studies have shown an association between statin use and a decreased risk of dementia. However, the mechanism by which this beneficial effect is brought about is unclear. In the context of Alzheimer’s disease, at least three possibilities have been studied; reduction in amyloid β peptide (Aβ) production, the promotion of α‐secretase cleavage and positive effects on neurite outgrowth. By investigating the effects of mevalonate pathway blockade on neurite outgrowth using real‐time imaging, we found that rather than promote the production of neurite extensions, inhibition rapidly induced cell rounding. Crucially, neurite‐like structures were generated through the persistence of cell–cell and cell–substrate adhesions and not through a mechanism of positive outgrowth. This effect can be strikingly enhanced by the over‐expression of human amyloid precursor protein and is isoprenoid rather than cholesterol dependent.

A report on the 3rd UK Stem Cell Meeting 'Epigenetics & Differentiation', London, UK, 11 March 2008.

Embryonic stem (ES) cells are important tools in the study of gene function and may also become important in cell therapy applications(1). Establishment of stable XX ES cell lines from mouse blastocysts is relatively problematic owing to frequent loss of one of the two X chromosomes. Here we show that DNA methylation is globally reduced in XX ES cell lines and that this is attributable to the presence of two active X chromosomes. Hypomethylation affects both repetitive and unique sequences, the latter including differentially methylated regions that regulate expression of parentally imprinted genes. Methylation of differentially methylated regions can be restored coincident with elimination of an X chromosome in early-passage parthenogenetic ES cells, suggesting that selection against loss of methylation may provide the basis for X-chromosome instability. Finally, we show that hypomethylation is associated with reduced levels of the de novo DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b and that ectopic expression of these factors restores global methylation levels.

In many higher organisms, 5%-15% of histone H2A is ubiquitylated at lysine 119 (uH2A). The function of this modification and the factors involved in its establishment, however, are unknown. Here we demonstrate that uH2A occurs on the inactive X chromosome in female mammals and that this correlates with recruitment of Polycomb group (PcG) proteins belonging to Polycomb repressor complex 1 (PRC1). Based on our observations, we tested the role of the PRC1 protein Ring1B and its closely related homolog Ring1A in H2A ubiquitylation. Analysis of Ring1B null embryonic stem (ES) cells revealed extensive depletion of global uH2A levels. On the inactive X chromosome, uH2A was maintained in Ring1A or Ring1B null cells, but not in double knockout cells, demonstrating an overlapping function for these proteins in development. These observations link H2A ubiquitylation, X inactivation, and PRC1 PcG function, suggesting an unanticipated and novel mechanism for chromatin-mediated heritable gene silencing.

In female mammals, a single X chromosome is stably and heritably silenced early in embryogenesis. The inactive X is characterized by asynchronous DNA replication and epigenetic chromatin modifications, including DNA methylation, histone H3/H4 hypoacetylation, and incorporation of a variant histone macroH2A. X inactivation is initiated by a cis-acting RNA molecule, the X-inactive specific transcript (Xist), which coats the chromosome. However, the mechanism by which Xist induces chromosome silencing is poorly understood. An important approach towards answering this question has been to determine the temporal order of epigenetic chromatin modifications in an in vitro model system, differentiating XX embryonic stem (ES) cells, and thereby to identify candidate targets for Xist RNA. To date, these studies have demonstrated that, following accumulation of Xist RNA, the transition to late replication of the X chromosome is the earliest detectable event. H4 hypoacetylation, macroH2A1.2 incorporation, and DNA methylation all occur subsequently. Recently, it has been shown that chromatin of the inactive X is also characterized by methylation of histone H3 at lysine 9 (H3-K9). Here we show that H3-K9 methylation is a very early event in the process of X inactivation, which closely parallels the onset of Xist RNA accumulation.

The molecular mechanism underlying X chromosome inactivation in female mammals involves the non-coding RNAs Xist and its antisense partner Tsix. Prior to X inactivation, these RNAs are transcribed in an unstable form from all X chromosomes, both in the early embryo and in undifferentiated embryonic stem (ES) cells. Upon differentiation, the expression of these unstable transcripts from all alleles is silenced, and Xist RNA becomes stabilised specifically on the inactivating X chromosome. This pattern of expression is then maintained throughout subsequent somatic cell divisions. Once established, the inactive state of the X chromosome is remarkably stable, the only natural case of reactivation occurring in XX primordial germ cells (PGCs) when they enter the genital ridge. To gain insight into the X reactivation process, we have analysed Xist gene expression using RNA FISH in PGCs and also in PGC-derived embryonic germ (EG) cells. XX EG cells were shown to express unstable Xist/Tsix from both X chromosomes. In contrast, no unstable Xist/Tsix transcripts were detected in XX PGCs at any stage. Instead, a proportion of XX PGCs isolated from the genital ridge between 11.5 and 13.5 dpc (the period during which X chromosome reactivation occurs) showed an accumulation of stable Xist RNA on one X. The number of these cells decreased progressively and was nearly extinguished by 13.5 dpc. As a late marker for the inactive state, we analysed localisation of the histone H2A variant macroH2A1.2. Although macroH2A1.2 expression was observed in PGCs, no significant localisation to the inactive X was detected at any stage. We discuss these results in the context of understanding X chromosome reactivation.

Post-translational modifications of histone amino termini are an important regulatory mechanism that induce transitions in chromatin structure, thereby contributing to epigenetic gene control and the assembly of specialized chromosomal subdomains1,2. Methylation of histone H3 at lysine 9 (H3–Lys9) by site-specific histone methyltransferases (Suv39h HMTases)3 marks constitutive heterochromatin4,5,6. Here, we show that H3–Lys9 methylation also occurs in facultative heterochromatin of the inactive X chromosome (Xi) in female mammals. H3–Lys9 methylation is retained through mitosis, indicating that it might provide an epigenetic imprint for the maintenance of the inactive state. Disruption of the two mouse Suv39h HMTases abolishes H3-Lys9 methylation of constitutive heterochromatin but not that of the Xi. In addition, HP1 proteins, which normally associate with heterochromatin, do not accumulate with the Xi. These observations suggest the existence of an Suv39h-HP1-independent pathway regulating H3-Lys9 methylation of facultative heterochromatin.

The histone 2A variant macroH2A1.2 is expressed in female and male mammals and is implicated in X-chromosome inactivation and autosomal gene silencing. In undifferentiated and early differentiating murine embryonic stem (ES) cells a cytosolic pool of macroH2A1.2 has recently been reported and found to be associated with the centrosome. Here, we show that the centrosomal association of macroH2A1.2 is a widespread phenomenon and is not restricted to undifferentiated and early differentiating ES cells. By indirect immunofluorescence we detect macroH2A1.2 protein in a juxtanuclear structure that duplicates once per cell cycle and colocalizes with centrosomal gamma-tubulin in both XX and XY ES cells prior to and throughout their differentiation. MacroH2A1.2 localization to the centrosome is also observed in female and male somatic cells, both in interphase and in mitosis. Biochemical analysis demonstrates that the association between macroH2A1.2 and the centrosome in somatic cells is stable, as macroH2A1.2 copurifies with centrosomes isolated from human lymphoblasts. Therefore, in addition to a nuclear pool of macroH2A1.2 a fraction of the histone is associated with the centrosome in various cell types and throughout ES cell differentiation.

The histone macroH2A1.2 has been implicated in X chromosome inactivation on the basis of its accumulation on the inactive X chromosome (Xi) of adult female mammals. We have established the timing of macroH2A1.2 association with the Xi relative to the onset of X-inactivation in differentiating murine embryonic stem (ES) cells using immuno-RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Before X-inactivation we observe a single macroH2A1.2-dense region in both undifferentiated XX and XY ES cells that does not colocalize with X inactive specific transcript (Xist) RNA, and thus appears not to associate with the X chromosome(s). This pattern persists through early stages of differentiation, up to day 7. Then the frequency of XY cells containing a macroH2A1.2-rich domain declines. In contrast, in XX cells there is a striking relocalization of macroH2A1.2 to the Xi. Relocalization occurs in a highly synchronized wave over a 2-d period, indicating a precisely regulated association. The timing of macroH2A1.2 accumulation on the Xi suggests it is not necessary for the initiation or propagation of random X-inactivation.

We have identified a class of pre-mRNAs that are spliced in HeLa extracts depleted for U1 snRNP (delta U1 extracts). Previously, we described pre-mRNAs that can be spliced in delta U1 extracts only when high concentrations of SR splicing factors are added. In contrast, the substrates characterized here are efficiently processed in delta U1 extracts without the addition of excess SR proteins. The members of this class comprise both a naturally occurring pre-mRNA, from the Drosophila fushi tarazu gene, and a chimera containing sequences from two different pre-mRNAs that individually are dependent upon U1 snRNP or excess SR proteins. Several sequence elements account for the variations in dependence on U1 snRNP and SR proteins for splicing. In one pre-mRNA, a single element was identified adjacent to the branch site. In the other, two elements flanking the 5' splice site were found to be critical. This U1-independent splicing reaction may provide a mechanism for cells to control the extent of processing of different classes of pre-mRNAs in response to altered activities of SR proteins, and furthermore suggests that U1 snRNP-independent splicing may not be uncommon.

Splicing of mRNA precursors (pre‐mRNA) is preceded by assembly of the pre‐mRNA with small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) and protein factors to form a splicesome. Here we show that stimulating Ser/Thr‐specific protein dephosphorylation selectively inhibits an early step during mammalian spliceosome assembly. Treatment of HeLa nuclear splicing extracts with human protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) expressed in Escherichia coli, or PP1 purified from rabbit skeletal muscle, prevents pre‐spliceosome E complex (early complex) formation and stable binding of U2 and U4/U6.U5 snRNPs to the pre‐mRNA. PP1 does not inhibit splicing catalysis if added after spliceosome assembly has taken place. Addition of purified SR protein splicing factors restores spliceosome formation and splicing to PP1‐inhibited extracts, consistent with SR proteins being targets regulated by phosphorylation. These data extend earlier observations showing that splicing catalysis, but not spliceosome assembly, is blocked by inhibiting protein phosphatases. It therefore appears that pre‐mRNA splicing, in common with other biological processes, can be regulated both positively and negatively by reversible protein phosphorylation.

We have used a combination of highly specific protein phosphatase inhibitors and purified mammalian protein phosphatases to show that at least two separate Ser/Thr protein phosphatase activities are required for pre-mRNA splicing, but not for spliceosome assembly. Okadaic acid, tautomycin, and microcystin-LR, which are potent and specific inhibitors of PP1 and PP2A, two of the four major types of Ser/Thr-specific phosphatase catalytic subunits, block both catalytic steps of the pre-mRNA splicing mechanism in HeLa nuclear extracts. Inhibition of PP2A inhibits the second step of splicing predominantly while inhibition of both PP1 and PP2A blocks both steps, indicating a differential contribution of PP1 and PP2A activities to the two separate catalytic steps of splicing. Splicing activity is restored to toxin-inhibited extracts by the addition of highly purified mammalian PP1 or PP2A. Protein phosphatase activity was not required for efficient assembly of splicing complexes containing each of the U1, U2, U4/U6 and U5 snRNPs. The data indicate that reversible protein phosphorylation may play an important role in regulating the pre-mRNA splicing mechanism.