We sought to understand the results of using different estimating equations (with and without a “race” category) and the addition of cystatin C as a biomarker on Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) stage estimates among persons with HIV (PWH), for whom CKD is an important comorbidity. Biomarkers were measured in this cross-sectional single site U.S. clinic-based study from 2014 to 2016. Other laboratory and clinical data were abstracted from the electronic health record based on the last recorded value proximal to the study visit. Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) glomerular filtration estimating equations with and without cystatin C were applied to categorize CKD stage, and staging agreement was assessed using the difference of proportions test. Multivariable regression analyses evaluated factors associated with CKD stage, and the Breslow-Day test evaluated whether race served as an effect modifier. Among 306 PWH, the median age was 48.2 years, 86 (28

Background: Invasive mold infections (IMIs) in hospitalized patients can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Environmental factors, such as hospital construction and negative air-pressure rooms (NAPRs), have been associated with hospital-acquired IMI. Increased utilization of NAPRs during the COVID-19 pandemic created a unique opportunity to examine the impact of NAPRs on IMI risk. Methods: From 2018 to present, a new pavilion was being constructed adjacent to our hospital. The Theradoc platform was used to identify positive mold cultures among adult patients hospitalized at our institution between March 1, 2017, and October 15, 2022. We performed a retrospective chart review of 262 mold isolates to determine patient demographics, timing of IMI, and their relationship to hospital construction and exposure to NAPR. IMI incidence was compared across 3 observation periods: (A) before hospital construction; (B) during hospital construction alone; and (C) during hospital construction and NAPR enhancement during the COVID-19 surge. Hospital-acquired IMI was defined as an infection that occurred >72 hours after admission. A REDCap database was created for data storage and R software was used for data analysis. Results: Of the 262 mold isolates identified, 61 cases were classified as IMI, of which 29 were hospital-acquired IMI. The mean age of IMI patients was 51.8 years, and 55.2% were male. Among them, 20.7% were exposed to NAPR during admission; 65.5.% were immunocompromised; and 2 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19. The all-cause mortality rate among hospital-acquired IMI cases was 79.3% (23 of 29). Also, 82.8% of hospital-acquired IMI cases were respiratory in nature, with 83.3% of these cases due to Aspergillus spp. Yearly rates of hospital-acquired IMI were 3.0 before construction versus 5.6 during construction (periods B and C). Yearly rates of hospital-acquired IMI, respiratory IMI, and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis by period were as follows: Period A had 3 hospital-acquired IMI cases per year, 2 hospital-acquired respiratory IMI cases per year, and 3 hospital-acquired invasive pulmonary aspergillosis cases per year. Period B had 4.5 hospital-acquired IMI cases per year, 3.5 hospital-acquired respiratory IMI cases per year, and 3.0 hospital-acquired invasive pulmonary aspergillosis cases per year. Period C had 6.5 hospital-acquired IMI cases per year, 5.4 hospital-acquired respiratory IMI cases per year, and 5.0 hospital-acquired invasive pulmonary aspergillosis cases per year. Conclusions: Hospital-acquired IMI was associated with a high mortality. Our data demonstrate a >2-fold increase in yearly incidence of hospital-acquired IMI before construction compared with during construction in association with increased implementation of NAPR. We have now reversed the trend in NAPR at our hospital’s designated COVID-19 units.Disclosures: None

Abstract Background Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is a major cause of community and healthcare-acquired bacteremia and is associated with a high burden of morbidity and mortality. Appropriately tailoring management based on methicillin sensitivity can help minimize unnecessary administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics and ensure adequate treatment of MSSA/MRSA. The Verigene® (Luminex Corporation) is a multiplex PCR assay that provides rapid identification of bloodstream pathogens. We performed a QI project to determine the utility of this assay in managing patients with SAB. Methods We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of positive SAB cultures from May 2020 to May 2021. Electronic health record review was conducted to abstract patient demographics, clinical characteristics, outcomes, blood culture data, and antibiotic management. Statistical analysis was done with the unpaired t-test and fishers exact test to identify associations of statistical significance. Results We identified 97 cases of SAB: 66% MSSA (n = 64), 34% MRSA (n = 33). Patient characteristics included: mean age 61 years, 58.8% male, 42% immunocompromised, 83.5% with ID consult, 38.1% with ICU admission, mean length of stay 20.3d, and 24.7% mortality. Using the Verigene® assay, we noted 2.6% discordance with standard microbiological technique (n = 2). The timing of Verigene® results and provider response were as follows: The mean duration of SAB was 3.1d (MSSA = 2.8d, MRSA = 3.6d, p = 0.2477). There was a statistically significant difference in patient mortality with respect to methicillin sensitivity status: MSSA 15.6%, MRSA 42.4%, p = 0.0075, as well as mortality with ID consult 19.8% versus no ID consult 50%, p = 0.0223. Conclusion Despite the incorporation of a rapid multiplex PCR assay to detect bloodstream infections, the time to de-escalation for MSSA was sub-optimal (2.7 days). ID consultation continues to be an important component of SAB management as it improves patient outcomes and contributes to education of healthcare providers. Disclosures Lan Duong, PharmD, Johnson & Johnson: Stocks/Bonds|Lilly USA: Stocks/Bonds|Novavax: Stocks/Bonds Princy N. Kumar, MD, American Gene Technologies: Grant/Research Support|BioHaven: Grant/Research Support|Eli Lilly: Grant/Research Support|Gilead: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Gilead: Stocks/Bonds|GSK: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Stocks/Bonds|Johnson&Johnson: Advisor/Consultant|Johnson&Johnson: Stocks/Bonds|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Stocks/Bonds|Moderna: Stocks/Bonds|Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds|Regeneron: Grant/Research Support|TheraTechnologies: Grant/Research Support|ViiV: Advisor/Consultant Joseph G. Timpone, Jr., MD, Gilead: Stocks/Bonds|Merck: Stocks/Bonds.

Abstract Background Ceftazidime-avibactam (caz-avi), a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor, is commonly utilized for carbapenem-resistant gram-negative infections (CR-GNI). However, the benefits vs risks of combining caz-avi with other agents are unclear. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, inpatients with CR-GNI treated with caz-avi were identified at 9 U.S. hospitals. The impact of caz-avi monotherapy (MT) or combination therapy (CT; i.e., any concomitant use of gram-negative-active antibiotics) was studied using logistic regression, controlling for baseline patient and hospital factors. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality or discharge to hospice (death), and secondary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), resolution of infectious signs and symptoms (clinical response), 90-day recurrent infection and future caz-avi–resistant organism. An adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess the primary and secondary outcomes. Results 328/499 (65.7%) patients received caz-avi as targeted therapy for a CR-GNI. Overall patients treated with MT and CT were similar at baseline and had comparable baseline demographics although patients treated with CT were more likely to be in the ICU and receive a concomitant empiric in vitro-concordant antibiotic (table 1). The most common organism was Klebsiella spp. (44.6%) followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (27.7%) (table 2). Concomitant gram-negative agents are shown in table 3. Overall, 92 (28.1%) patients died and CT (vs MT) displayed similar adjusted mortality risk (27.7% vs 28.7%; aOR [95%CI]: 0.67 [0.34-1.33]) and LOS (19 [9, 37] and 20 [9, 42.5] days). CT (vs MT) was associated with greater odds of clinical response (aOR: 2.25 [95%CI:1.15-4.41]). Among survivors, similar rates of 90-day recurrent infection (50/154 (32.5%) were observed in CT vs 18/82 (22.0%) in MT group (p=0.09) and 5 (2.19%) patients had future infection with a caz-avi–resistant pathogen (3 in CT and 2 in MT group). Conclusion Compared to patients with CR-GNI treated with caz-avi alone, those who received CT including caz-avy had similar survival and LOS but higher clinical response. The role of CT in the era of novel antibiotics warrants additional study. Disclosures Helen W. Boucher, MD, American Society of Microbiology: Honoraria|Elsevier: Honoraria|Sanford Guide: Honoraria.

SARS-CoV-2 is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide with rising death toll over 5.4 million. The severe presentation of the disease is associated with systemic inflammation, activation of the coagulation cascade and immunological dysfunction. Numerous studies implicate endothelial activation and dysfunction as playing an important role; however, the pathways involved are not well-understood. Endothelial injury and damage trigger a mechanism of vascular repair mediated by bone marrow derived endothelial progenitor cells and recently discovered a type of T cells with angiogenic properties. In this study, we hypothesize that SARS-COV-2 alters this pathway. To address this hypothesis, we determined changes in the frequency and phenotype of these two cell types, the circulating endothelial progenitor (EPC) (LIN4−CD45−CD34+) and Tang cells (CXCR4+CD31+) using PBMCs from hospitalized COVID-19 positive (n = 10) and healthy (n = 11) donors. Our results indicate a decrease in the frequency of CD4 and CD8 Tang cells compared with healthy controls (p=0.003; p=0.01). In addition, Tang cells showed a significant increase in the expression of progenitor marker (CD49f) (p<0.001; p=0.016), and no changes were observed in the frequency and phenotype of the LIN4−CD45−CD34+. Moreover, a negative association was observed between Tang cells and plasma levels of the procoagulant PAI-1 biomarker (r=−0.806, p=0.007; r=−0.818, p=0.006), and CD8 Tang cells were inversely correlated with the levels of MMP9 and TNFa, (r=−0.879, p=0.002; r=−0.709, p=0.027). Altogether these data suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection reduces the frequency of Tang cells and promote activation and may interfere with their vascular repair function.

BACKGROUND:Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after solid organ transplantation. While guidelines suggest using highly sensitive QNAT assays for CMV detection, there is no defined viral load to guide initiation of preemptive therapy. This study evaluates the progression to quantifiable CMV (DNAemia) following a CMV "blip" in high-risk (D+/R) kidney/kidney-pancreas (KP) transplant recipients.METHODS:This is a single center, retrospective study. A CMV "blip" was defined as the first positive QNAT assay below the level of quantification (<1.37 × 102 IU/ml or <200 viral copies). Subsequent CMV QNAT assays were followed to assess the progression from blip to CMV DNAemia for 1 year following transplant.RESULTS:A total of 134 patients were included in the study. Fifty-three (39.6%) patients had their first positive CMV QNAT value below the level of quantification, a "CMV blip." Of these 53 patients, 69.8% (n = 37) progressed to DNAemia while 30.2% (n = 16) did not. The median time from transplant to the first CMV blip was 68 (46-97) days and most patients with viral blips (71.1%) were on prophylaxis. No differences in patient characteristics were found among those who progressed from blip to DNAemia and those who only had a blip.CONCLUSIONS:In CMV high-risk kidney/KP transplant recipients, CMV blips progressed to CMV DNAemia in the majority of cases. This progression typically occurred 2-3 weeks following the initial blip. CMV blips are common early posttransplant despite prophylaxis and likely represent an early marker of CMV infection.

OBJECTIVE:To examine the etiologies, risk factors, and microbiology of bloodstream infections (BSIs) among intestinal and multivisceral transplant recipients in the 2-year post-operative period.METHODS:A retrospective medical record review of adult intestinal or multivisceral transplant recipients between 2003 and 2015. Descriptive statistics were used to describe cohort data. Logistic regression was used to assess factors related to BSIs using a backward selection process.RESULTS:One-hundred and six intestinal or multivisceral transplants were performed in 103 individuals. Fifty-eight percent (n = 62) developed a BSI in the 2-year post-operative period with a median time to first BSI of 53 days (interquartile range [IQR] 15, 169). The majority of BSIs were catheter related 38% (n = 58) when the source was known. Common microbiological isolates included enterococcus 20% (n = 36/174), coagulase-negative staphylococcus 14% (n = 23), and 12% Klebsiella spp (n = 21). Forty-seven percent (n = 17) of the enterococci were resistant to vancomycin, and 14% (n = 10/70) of the gram negatives were extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producers. In adjusted analyses, (OR: 0.200 95% CI: 0.2, 0.514, P = .009) men were less likely to have a BSI. Transplant recipient age, allograft type, comorbidities, rejection, and length of stay were not noted to be risk factors for development of BSIs in our cohort. Mortality at 2-years post-transplant was similar for those who did not develop a BSI and those that developed infection, P = .5028.CONCLUSIONS:BSIs are a common complication of intestinal transplantation, and central venous catheters were a common source. Interventions such as early catheter removal should be implemented to prevent infections in this population. Female sex association with BSI requires further investigation.

Abstract Background The IL-6 inhibitor Tocilizumab (TOCI) has been associated with infections in 5-8% of patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. TOCI has now been recommended as a treatment option for select patients with COVID-19; however, the risk of infection in this patient population is yet to be determined. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and admitted to MedStar hospitals within the D.C./Baltimore corridor from 03/01/2020 to 12/31/2020. We identified patients who had positive culture data within 30 days of administration of TOCI-based regimens and analyzed clinical characteristics and outcomes. Univariate analyses (Wilcoxon, T-test, Chi-Square, Fisher’s Exact) were used to compare these outcome variables between patients who had post-treatment infections and those who did not. Results A total of 220 patients received TOCI-based regimens; 16% (N=36) of patients developed positive cultures within 30 days of treatment. Of the 99 cultures, 50% were gram positive (N=49), 38% were gram negative (N=38), 10% were Candida spp. (N=10), and 2% were anaerobic organisms (N=2). Only 9% (8/87) of the gram positive and gram negative organisms were MDROs. Bloodstream infections were the most common and accounted for 58.4% of all infections. Length of stay (LOS) was approximately twice as long in those with post-treatment infections (26 days) compared to those without infections (14 days, p< 0.001). Although the mortality rate was higher in patients with infections after TOCI-based treatment compared to patients with no post-treatment infection (47% vs 31% respectively), this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.09). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the infection rate of patients treated with TOCI alone compared to TOCI and Dexamethasone (16.6% vs. 13.3%, p=0.99). No cases of invasive Aspergillosis were observed. Conclusion Tocilizumab treatment in patients with COVID-19 may predispose patients to an increased risk of infection which is associated with a prolonged LOS and possibly higher mortality. We observed a two-fold increase in infections in COVID-19 patients compared to other patient groups receiving this treatment. Disclosures Princy N. Kumar, MD, AMGEN (Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria)Eli Lilly (Grant/Research Support)Gilead (Grant/Research Support, Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria)GSK (Grant/Research Support, Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria)Merck & Co., Inc. (Grant/Research Support, Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria)

Abstract Background Treatment strategies for COVID-19 have evolved based on clinical trials. We performed a retrospective analysis to determine treatment outcomes for Remdesivir (RDV), Tocilizumab (TOCI), and/or Dexamethasone (DEX) in a representative population from the Mid-Atlantic region. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed for patients admitted to MedStar hospitals within the D.C./Baltimore corridor from 03/01/2020 to 12/31/2020, and diagnosed with COVID-19 using a NP SARS-CoV-2 RT PCR assay. The MedStar Pharmacy Database was utilized to stratify based on any combination of RDV, TOCI, DEX treatment. Our primary endpoints included O2 delivery device, length of stay (LOS), and mortality. Results A total of 2488 patients were included. Overall, the average age of patients was 62yrs, 53% male, and the majority of patients were of Black (54%) or White (27%) race. The average length of stay was 11 days (SD = 12) with a mortality of 14%. Using univariate analyses, all combinations of RDV, TOCI, and DEX treatment regimens were evaluated. Patients who received DEX required the most ventilatory support on Day 1 (5%, p< 0.001) compared to all other groups. These same patients, however, did not go on to have higher ventilatory needs (17%, p< 0.001) compared to the group which ultimately required the most ventilatory support, TOCI plus DEX (94%, p< 0.001) at Day 28 of treatment. TOCI use alone was associated with a 4% to 63% (p< 0.001) increase in need for ventilatory support over the course of 28 days (Figure 1). The shortest LOS was seen in those treated with DEX alone (9.5 days, p< 0.001). Longer LOS outcomes were associated with all treatment groups which included TOCI use (19 to 22 days, p< 0.001, Figure 2). Mortality was similarly higher among all treatment groups which contained TOCI (30% to 62.5%, p< 0.001, Figure 3) when compared to those with RDV and/or DEX use alone (10% to 14%, p< 0.001). Barplot of Oxygen Delivery Device at Admission and within 28 Days among Treatments Figure 1. Largest increase in ventilatory support from Day 1 of treatment (left) to Day 28 of treatment (right) was seen among TOCI and DEX (0% to 93.8%), RDV and TOCI (0% to 72.2%) and TOCI alone (3.7% to 63.4%). Figure 2. LOS was higher among all treatments containing TOCI (p<0.001), with the highest being the combination group of RDV, TOCI, and DEX (22.4 days, p<0.001). Figure 3. Treatment regimens containing TOCI accounted for the highest mortality rates as seen in TOCI and DEX use (62.5%), RDV and TOCI (44.4%), and TOCI use alone (30.4%). Conclusion Our study demonstrates that “real-world” clinical outcomes for patients with COVID-19 treated with Remdesivir, Tocilizumab, and Dexamethasone are consistent with what has been reported in clinical trials. The higher mortality associated with Tocilizumab treatment may reflect the use of this agent in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Disclosures Princy N. Kumar, MD, AMGEN (Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria)Eli Lilly (Grant/Research Support)Gilead (Grant/Research Support, Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria)GSK (Grant/Research Support, Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria)Merck & Co., Inc. (Grant/Research Support, Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria)

Abstract Background Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 have created increased demands on health care infrastructure and resources. Bacterial and fungal infections have been reported and have increased the need for antimicrobial utilization. We performed a retrospective chart review to characterize bacterial infections and antibiotic utilization during the COVID-19 surge at our tertiary care center. Methods All patients diagnosed with COVID-19 using SARS-CoV-2 PCR admitted to MedStar Georgetown University Hospital from 01Mar2020 through 31Aug2020 were included in the analysis. Data was collected on hospital-wide antimicrobial utilization [mean days of therapy per 1000-patient-days (DOT)] during the 6-month surge and was compared to antimicrobial utilization during a 6-month period that preceded the COVID-19 surge. Clinical and microbiological data and patient outcomes were also collected and analyzed. Results A total of 238 patients met eligibility criteria during the observation period, of which 25.6% (n = 61) developed a bacterial, fungal, or viral co-infection. Culture-positive bacterial complications were seen in 21.8% (n = 52) with 32.8% (n = 20) having a multidrug resistant organism (MDRO). There was a statistically significant difference between COVID-19 patients with co-infection and those without for intubation (p < 0.001), vasopressor use (p < 0.001), and renal replacement therapy (p = 0.001). COVID-19 patients with co-infections had a longer mean length of stay (21.9 days vs 13.5 days, p < 0.001) and greater mortality (32.8% vs 20.6%, p = 0.006) compared to those without a co-infection, respectively. Mean antimicrobial utilization for the entire hospital population was 790.6 DOT during the COVID surge compared to 928.7 DOT during a 6-month period preceding the COVID surge (p < 0.001). For all COVID-19 patients, antimicrobial utilization was 846.9 DOT; however, this increased to 1236.4 DOT for COVID-19 patients with co-infections. Table 1. Demographics Table 2. Antimicrobial Utilization in COVID-19 Patients Conclusion Although hospital-wide antimicrobial utilization had decreased during the COVID surge, COVID-19 patients with co-infections demonstrated a disproportionate use of antimicrobial agents as well as ICU resources. As MDRO infections were relatively common, antimicrobial stewardship should be prioritized in the COVID-19 population. Disclosures Lan Duong, Pharm.D., Astra Zeneca (Shareholder)Eli Lilly & Co. (Shareholder)Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Shareholder)Merck & Co. (Speaker’s Bureau)Moderna, Inc. (Shareholder)Novavax, Inc. (Shareholder)Sarepta Therapeutics (Shareholder)Thermo Fisher Scientific (Shareholder) Princy N. Kumar, MD, AMGEN (Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria)Eli Lilly (Grant/Research Support)Gilead (Grant/Research Support, Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria)GSK (Grant/Research Support, Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria)Merck & Co., Inc. (Grant/Research Support, Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria)

Abstract Background The CDC recommends testing for SARS-CoV-2 in patients who present with symptoms consistent with COVID-19 and to cohort hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Up to 35% of persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 are asymptomatic; however, no recommendations exist for universal testing in hospitalized patients. We assessed the point prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection amongst hospitalized patients at a tertiary care center during a time when there was a regional surge of cases. Methods Nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing was performed on inpatients at Georgetown University Hospital on 4/27/20, excluding those who were SARS-CoV-2 positive, tested within 72 hours or admitted to pediatric, psychiatric, labor & delivery or ICUs. Patients within the hospital were not cohorted based on COVID-19 status. Patient demographics and comorbidities were obtained from the EMR and analyzed for significance based on SARS-CoV-2 status. Results Hospital census on the testing date was 297; 204/297(68.7%) met inclusion criteria; 78/297(26.3%) were known COVID-19 patients. Within the study group 78/204 (38.2%) had known COVID-19, 21/204 (10.3%) were PUIs (4 of whom tested positive), 31/204 (15.1%) tested negative for COVID-19 within 72 hours and 74/204 (36.3%) met criteria for testing. The median age was 62 years (IQR, 53 to 70), 59%(n=122) were male, 56%(n= 115) were Black, and 90%(n=185) had at least one co-morbidity. 0/74 of those tested on 4/27/20 were positive for SARS-CoV-2, and none were diagnosed with COVID-19 within 28 days. In adjusted analyses, patients who were hospitalized for COVID-19 were more likely to be Black(OR=10.53 95% CI 3.02, 36.68, p=0.0002); male(OR=3.27 95% CI 1.26, 8.47, p=0.0143); reside in group/nursing homes(OR= 11.78 95%CI 3.03, 45.76, p=0.0004); have a history of prior stroke(OR= 6.25 95%CI 1.49, 26.12, p=0.012); but less likely to smoke(OR=0.10 95%CI 0.02, 0.48, p=0.0039), or have active malignancy (OR= 0.11 95%CI 0.01, 0.73, p=0.0223). Conclusion The use of CDC testing criteria for PUIs were successful in identifying COVID-19 patients and limiting the need for routine testing in all hospitalized patients during a time when access to testing was limited. Nosocomial transmission did not occur in our institution despite a lack of cohorting. Disclosures Princy Kumar, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator)

In this era of effective combination antiretroviral therapy the incidence of AIDS defining cancers (ADCs) is projected to decline while the incidence of certain non-AIDS defining cancers (NADCs) increases. Some of these NADCs are potentially preventable with appropriate cancer screening. We examined cancer incidence, screening eligibility, and receipt of screening among persons actively enrolled in the DC Cohort, a longitudinal observational cohort of PLWH, between 2011 and 2017. Cancer screening eligibility was determined based on age, sex, smoking history and co-morbidity data available and published national guidelines. The incidence rate of NADCs was 12.1 (95% CI 10.7, 13.8) and ADCs 1.6 (95% CI 0.6, 4.6) per 1000 person-years. The most common incident NADCs were breast 2.6 (95% CI 0.5,1 2.1), prostate 2.3 (95% CI 1.2, 4.3), and non-melanoma skin 1.2 (95% CI 0.6, 2.3) incident diagnoses/cases per 1000 person-years. Among cohort sites where receipt of cancer screening was assessed, less than 60% of eligible participants had any ascertained anal HPV, breast, cervical, colorectal, hepatocellular carcinoma, or lung cancer screening. In this cohort of PLWH, there were more incident NADCs versus ADCs in contrast to earlier cohort studies where ADCs predominated. Despite a large eligible population there were low rates of screening. Implementation of cancer screening is an important component of care among PLWH.

Liver transplantation has become an important treatment modality for patients with end-stage liver disease/cirrhosis, acute liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Although surgical techniques and immunosuppressive regimens for liver transplantation have improved significantly over the past 20 years, infectious complications continue to contribute to the morbidity and mortality in this patient population. The use of standardized screening protocols for both donors and recipients, coupled with targeted prophylaxis against specific pathogens, has helped to mitigate the risk of infection in liver transplant recipients. Patients with chronic liver disease and cirrhosis have immunological deficits that place them at increased risk for infection while awaiting liver transplantation. The patient undergoing liver transplantation is prone to develop healthcare-acquired infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms that could potentially affect patient outcomes after transplantation. The complex nature of liver transplant surgery that involves multiple vascular and hepatobiliary anastomoses further increases the risk of infection after liver transplantation. During the early post-transplantation period, healthcare-acquired bacterial and fungal infections are the most common types of infection encountered in liver transplant recipients. The period of maximal immunosuppression that occurs at 1–6 months after transplantation can be complicated by opportunistic infections due to both primary infection and reactivation of latent infection. Severe community-acquired infections can complicate the course of liver transplantation beyond 12 months after transplant surgery. This chapter provides an overview of liver transplantation including indications, donor-recipient selection criteria, surgical procedures, and immunosuppressive therapies. A focus on infections in patients with chronic liver disease/cirrhosis and an overview of the specific infectious complications in liver transplant recipients are presented.

BACKGROUND:Tracer antibiotic algorithms using administrative data were investigated to estimate mortality attributable to extensively drug-resistant gram-negative infections (GNIs).METHODS:Among adult inpatients coded for GNIs, colistin cases and 2 comparator cohorts (non-carbapenem β-lactams or carbapenems) treated for ≥4 consecutive days, or died while receiving the antibiotic, were separately propensity score-matched (1:2). Attributable mortality was the in-hospital mortality difference among propensity-matched groups. Infection characteristics and sepsis severity influences on attributable mortality were examined. Algorithm accuracy was assessed by chart review.RESULTS:Of 232,834 GNIs between 2010 and 2013 at 79 hospitals, 1,023 per 3,350 (30.5%) colistin and 9,188 per 105,641 (8.7%) β-lactam (non-carbapenem) comparator cases died. Propensity-matched colistin and β-lactam case mortality was 29.2% and 16.6%, respectively, for an attributable mortality of 12.6% (95% confidence interval 10.8-14.4%). Attributable mortality varied from 11.0% (7.5%-14.7%) for urinary to 15.5% (12.6%-18.4%) for respiratory (P < .0001), and 4.6% (2.1%-7.4%) for early (≤4 days) to 16.6% (14.3%-18.9%) for late-onset infections (P < .0001). Attributable mortality decreased to 7.5% (5.6%-9.4%) using a carbapenem comparator cohort but increased 9-fold in patients coded for severe sepsis or septic shock (P < .0001). Our colistin algorithm had a positive predictive value of 60.4% and sensitivity of 65.3%.CONCLUSIONS:Mortality attributable to treatment-limiting resistance during GNIs varied considerably by site, onset, and severity of infection.

BACKGROUND:Intestinal and multivisceral transplantations are treatment options for patients with intestinal failure. Transplantation is often complicated by abdominal and/or bloodstream infections in the post-operative period.METHODS:A retrospective chart review of all adults who underwent intestinal or multivisceral transplantation at our institution from 2003 to 2015 was performed. Data were collected for 2 years post transplant.RESULTS:A total of 106 intestinal or multivisceral transplants were performed in 103 patients. The median age at the time of transplant was 44 (IQR: 34-52) with 55% (n = 58) male and 45% (n = 48) female. There were 46 (43%) intra-abdominal infections post transplant among the 103 patients, and six transplant recipients (13%) developed concurrent bloodstream infections. The median time to first intra-abdominal infection was 23 days (IQR: 10-48). For those with organisms isolated in culture, forty-seven percent of the isolates were gram negative, 39% gram positive, 7% anaerobes, and 7% yeast. The most common isolates were enterococci at 28%, E. coli at 14%, and Klebsiella spp at 13%. Sixty-three percent of the enterococci were vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and 22% of the gram-negative isolates were extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs). Patients with intra-abdominal infections had longer hospital post-transplant length of stays at a median of 35 days (IQR: 25-48) vs 23 days (IQR: 17-33) for those without infections, P = .0012. There was no difference in all-cause mortality in patients with or without intra-abdominal infections, P = .654.CONCLUSIONS:Intra-abdominal infections are common in intestinal or multivisceral transplant recipients, but despite this complication, we found no increased risk of mortality. These transplant recipients are also at risk for infection with drug-resistant organisms.

Abstract Background Respiratory viral infections (RVI) are becoming increasingly recognized as an important cause of pneumonia. There is limited data regarding the role of rapid PCR testing for RVI and its effect on antibiotic duration and length of stay (LOS). Methods We performed a single-center, retrospective chart review in adult patients who were admitted and underwent evaluation with the FilmArray Multiplex Respiratory Panel (RP) (Biomerieux™) using a random sample from July 1, 2016 through April 1, 2018. Patient clinical and virologic characteristics, LOS, antibiotic use, and duration of treatment were collected. A Student’s t-test was performed for all comparisons. Results We identified 540 patients who were admitted and underwent RP testing. The mean age was 57.1 years (range 19–99), 50.2% were immunocompromised, 23.8% were transplant recipients, 70.4% had respiratory symptoms, and 35.7% had an admitting diagnosis of pneumonia. 55.6% required supplemental O2 and 24.6% had an ICU admission that required either noninvasive or mechanical ventilation. 22.6% (N = 122) of these patients were diagnosed with an RVI, of which 15 were co-infected with two or more respiratory viruses. There were 41 (34%) rhinovirus/enterovirus, 41 (34%) influenza (Types A/H1, A/H3, A/H1-2209, and B), 16 (13%) RSV, 15 (12%) coronavirus (Types NL63, OC43, 229E, and HKU1), 13 (11%) metapneumovirus, and 7 (5%) parainfluenza (Types 2, 3, and 4). 85.2% (104/122) of patients with an RVI received antibiotics. The mean LOS and antibiotic duration were 9.07 days and 7.31 days for patients with an RVI when compared with 11.5 days and 10.4 days for patients without an RVI (P = 0.098; P = 0.032), respectively. In patients with an RVI and negative bacterial cultures, the mean LOS was 8.4 days and mean antibiotic duration was 5.9 days when compared with 16.4 days and 15.5 days for all patients with positive bacterial cultures (P = 0.003; P < 0.0001), respectively. The mean time from available results of + RP to antibiotic discontinuation was 5.1 days in the setting of negative bacterial cultures. Conclusion Although antibiotic exposure and time to discontinuation still remained significant in patients diagnosed with an RVI, there was a marked reduction in LOS and antibiotic duration in the subset of patients with an RVI and negative bacterial cultures. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Verruconis gallopava is a neurotropic dematiaceous mold that causes a wide range of infections in immunocompromised and occasionally immunocompetent individuals. This mold has unique pathogenic characteristics. We describe a case of recurrent/relapsing V. gallopava infection in a renal transplant patient, which occurred years after transplantation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the second case of recurrent V. gallopava infection reported in the literature. We also discuss the unique clinical characteristics of this organism in solid organ transplant recipients and review current literature describing the potential treatment options for this organism.