Background and objective: G6PD enzyme deficiency is a genetic condition that can lead to acute hemolysis. This study evaluates the clinical performance of the point of care STANDARD G6PD Test in Kolkata, India, an area of high incidence of urban vivax malaria. Methods: Evaluation of the STANDARD G6PD Test was performed against a reference G6PD assay using UV spectrophotometry in a febrile population (N=951) recruited from outpatient clinics. Hemoglobin performance was compared to automated hematology analyzer measurements from venous blood. Genotyping was performed on a subset of samples including all deficients/intermediates to identify variants. Results: G6PD deficiency was 2.8%. 20.4% of the study population and had either moderate or severe anemia at enrollment. The tests sensitivity and specificity were 100% (95% CI: 87.2%–100%) and 97.8% (96.3%–98.8%), respectively, for G6PD deficient cases. Sensitivity and specificity for females with intermediate G6PD activity were 62.5 % (35.4%–84.8%) and 96.1% (93.3%–98.0%), respectively. Female intermediates with false normal G6PD results had reference G6PD activity greater than 45%. Among malaria–positive individuals (N=272), the test showed 100% sensitivity for both deficient and intermediate G6PD cases. Fifteen participants were identified as Orissa, 1 as Mahidol and 2 as Mediterranean variants. All severe anemia cases (n=24) were accurately categorized as such by STANDARD G6PD test. Interpretation and conclusion: The STANDARD G6PD Test tested at the fever clinic setting was reliable in diagnosing patients at greatest risk of drug induced hemolysis and supports safe treatment of P. vivax in this population. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. ### Funding Statement This work was supported partly by the FCDO, Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office by a grant to GJD (grant number 204139). This work was also supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (grant number OPP1107113) and RNP (grant number INV-010504). REDCap, Institute of Translational Health Sciences (ITHS), is supported by the NIH, National Institutes of Health, award number UL1 TR002319. The inference in this paper do not reflect the positions of FCDO, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, or the National Institutes of Health but are by the authors. The study design, data collection, data analysis and publication of the manuscript are by the authors and not by the funders. ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: This study was reviewed and approved by the PATH Research Ethics Committee, Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases Institutional Ethics Committee, and the Medical College of Kolkata Institutional Ethics Committee. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors and also contained in the manuscript.

BACKGROUND:The hit-hard-and-early (HHAE) strategy where treatment is initiated with high-efficacy therapies opposed to low-efficacy therapies presents a potential paradigm shift in multiple sclerosis (MS) management. This study aimed to assess the adoption of the HHAE strategy in Germany and the United States (US) from 2020 to 2022 based on real-world data. METHODS:The analysis was based on longitudinal, patient-level data from Germany and the US. For Germany, data was extracted from the Permea platform covering approximately 44 % of all German community pharmacy dispensing. For the US, data from the Komodo Healthcare Map™ was utilized, covering medical benefit data from around 88 % of the US patient population. Patients ≥18 years old and who had at least 2 prescriptions for MS-related disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) between January 2020 and December 2022 were included. To approximate therapy beginners, a washout period of one year before treatment start was applied, excluding all patients who had an MS-related DMD prescription or claim in 2019. Cohort entry date was the day of the first MS-related DMD dispense or claim. DMDs were classified as high-efficacy and low-efficacy based on the Multiple Sclerosis Therapy Consensus Group (MSTCG). Group differences were assessed with two-sided χ2-square and t-tests. RESULTS:29,604 MS therapy beginners were identified in the German and 49,791 MS therapy beginners were identified in the US dataset. 29.6 % of MS therapy beginners in Germany and 61.6 % in the US followed the HHAE strategy. Between 2020 and 2022, a significant 14 % increase in the HHAE strategy was observed in both countries (p < 0.0001). High-efficacy therapy beginners switched from their initially prescribed therapy less frequently than low-efficacy therapy beginners: 6.9 % of high-efficacy vs. 19.5 % of low-efficacy therapy beginners in Germany (p < 0.0001) and 5.5 % of high-efficacy vs. 25.0 % low-efficacy therapy beginners in the US (p < 0.0001) switched from their first prescribed DMD. CONCLUSION:Between 2020 and 2022, the adoption of the HHAE strategy increased in both countries, with the US exhibiting nearly double the adoption rates. High-efficacy therapy beginners were less likely to switch from their initially prescribed medication than low-efficacy therapy beginners. Real world evidence can provide valuable insights into rapidly changing treatment patterns in patients with MS.

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Die chronisch‐entzündliche Hauterkrankung Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) führt bei Betroffenen zu ausgeprägten Schmerzen und verminderter Lebensqualität. Trotzdem vergehen oft mehrere Jahre bis zur korrekten Diagnosestellung. In dieser Analyse sollten krankheitsbedingte Erfahrungen und Wege der Patienten mit HS untersucht und der ärztlichen Sicht gegenübergestellt werden. Patienten und Methodik Für die Studie wurden Ergebnisse einer Befragung von Dermatologen und deren Patienten zur Versorgungsrealität bei HS in Deutschland sowie öffentliche Beiträge auf Internet‐Foren und in sozialen Medien analysiert. Zusätzlich wurden Abrechnungsdaten deutscher Krankenkassen ausgewertet. Ergebnisse Patienten mit HS haben eine um 43,3% reduzierte Arbeitsfähigkeit. Die Dermatologie (26,5%) war der am häufigsten konsultierte Fachbereich, die Diagnose HS wurde dabei überwiegend im stationären Bereich (43,8%) gestellt. Als häufigste alternative Diagnose bei HS‐Patienten wurden Abszesse angegeben (53,2%). Die Analyse von Wechseln zu anderen Behandlern ergab, dass diese in der Dermatologie (34,1%) und der Chirurgie (42,4%) vorwiegend innerhalb des Fachbereiches erfolgen. Überweisungen erhielt die Dermatologie mehrheitlich aus dem hausärztlichen Bereich (67,1%) allerdings nur 12,1% von Chirurgen. Schlussfolgerungen Die Diagnoseverzögerung und die dadurch verlängerte Krankheitsbelastung von Patienten mit HS muss dringend reduziert werden. Dazu sollte, möglichst schon als Teil des Medizinstudiums, ein über die Dermatologie hinaus reichendes Bewusstsein für die Erkrankung, ihre Erkennung und Behandlung gefördert werden.

Background: With a rising number of multiple sclerosis (MS) cases and increasing pressure on health systems, digital companion apps like Brisa, designed specifically for people with MS, can play an important role in the patient journey. These apps enable the collection of real-time longitudinal data that are critical to our understanding of the pathophysiology and progression of MS. Methods: This retrospective, descriptive analysis consists of data from Brisa users who registered between 6 August 2021 and 8 September 2022. Of the unique users, 37.7% (n = 1593) fulfilled the inclusion criteria including information about medication and demographics and tracked one or more symptoms and/or patient-reported outcomes. Users were classified as moderate-efficacy treatment users, high-efficacy treatment users and ocrelizumab users, and the reporting frequency and scores of symptoms and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed. Results: The largest cohort of Brisa users (405) reported treatment with ocrelizumab and were mostly diagnosed 2–5 years before the survey. The most reported MS symptoms were similar between OUs (ocrelizumab users), HETUs (high-efficacy treatment users) and METUs (moderate-efficacy treatment users). OUs on average reported symptoms and answered questionnaires more frequently. Baseline scores between HETUs and OUs were similar, whereas baseline scores of METUs were slightly lower in comparison. In a further analysis of OUs, disability scores increased with age; users aged 26–45 years had higher pain scores than 18–25-year-olds. No significant differences were found in quality of life, bowel control and vision between age groups. Conclusion: These findings show that the characteristics of the Brisa cohort are similar to the results of other studies and registries and can provide a representative overview of everyday disease management. Thereby, these results can bridge the gap between clinical research and real patient experience, but they also raise new questions, such as how often the hard-and-early therapy approach is already used and whether baseline characteristics and reasons for choosing a particular treatment contribute to the different outcomes over time. Answering these questions requires further research and analysis.

BackgroundThe chronic inflammatory skin disease hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) leads to severe pain and reduced quality of life. Nonetheless, it often takes years until a correct diagnosis is made. In this analysis, disease-related experiences and pathways of patients with HS were investigated and compared with the physicians' perspective.MethodsPublic posts on forums and social media as well as results of a survey conducted among dermatologists and their patients on the actual medical care reality of HS in Germany were analysed. Furthermore, claims data from German health insurance companies were evaluated.ResultsPatients with HS suffer from a 43.3% reduction in working ability. Dermatology (26.5%) was the most frequently consulted specialty, with HS diagnosed predominantly in the inpatient setting (43.8%). Abscesses were described as the most frequent alternative diagnosis in HS patients (53.2%). Patient-reported changes of physicians in dermatology (34.1%) and surgery (42.4%) occurred predominantly within the specialty. Dermatology received most referrals from general practitioners (67.1%), but only 12.1% from surgeons.ConclusionThere is an urgent need to reduce the delay in diagnosis and the prolonged burden of disease in patients with HS. Therefore, awareness of the disease, its detection and treatment which goes beyond dermatology should be promoted, if possible as part of medical studies.

Background: While evidence highlights the effectiveness of initiating disease-modifying therapy with a high-efficacy medication for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with poor prognostic factors, it remains unclear whether this approach has been adopted by a broad range of MS providers in Germany yet. Objective: To assess the adoption of the early highly effective treatment (EHT) compared to the treat-to-target treatment approach with the option of escalating treatment efficacy over time in Germany based on real-world evidence data. Design: Patient-level pharmacy dispensing data from the Permea platform were analysed from 2020 to 2022. Methods: In total, 29,529 therapy beginners (>18 years) were included to analyse shifts in treatment approaches over time and switching behaviour. Medication classification adhered to the German Society of Neurology guidelines and designated fumarates, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide and interferons as low-efficacy category 1 medications; cladribine and S1P-modulators as medium-efficacy category 2 medications; and alemtuzumab, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab and rituximab (off-label) as high-efficacy category 3 medications. Results: Our results show that 70.0% of patients redeemed their first prescription for category 1 medication, 16.3% for category 2 and 13.7% for category 3 medications. The proportion of prescriptions filled shifted from 2020 to 2022 with a decrease of 14.7% for category 1 drugs and an increase of 12.5% for category 3 drugs. 93.2% of patients stayed on their initially prescribed medication category. 3.2% of category 1 and 3.7% of category 2 therapy beginners escalated to category 3 medication. 3.4% of category 3 medication users de-escalated their treatment to category 1 or category 2. Conclusion: While most individuals started their treatment according to the treat-to-target approach and remained on their initially prescribed medication category, there has been a steadily increasing shift towards the EHT approach since 2020. These insights demonstrate that, while not officially recommended by German guidelines, MS providers increasingly adopt the EHT approach.

Background Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic and progressive neurological autoimmune disease currently affecting 250,000 individuals in Germany. Patients suffering from the disease can be severely impaired in their day-to-day activities. BRISA is a digital app specifically designed to help MS patients monitor their disease by regularly tracking symptoms. Lengthy and time-consuming questionnaires for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) are the standard method to assess the patients’ current condition. Here, we examine whether simplified versions of these questionnaires can provide comparable information regarding individual symptom presentations in BRISA users. Methods 828 users were included in the analysis. Patients who provided onboarding information and answered at least one questionnaire and the corresponding simplified smiley symptoms assessment were included. Correlation of questionnaire and symptom scores was calculated using Pearson's correlation. Results Our analysis cohort predominantly consisted of female, 26–55-year-olds. Relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) was the most common MS type recorded. Most patients were diagnosed 2–5 years ago. Questionnaires regarding fatigue and vision impairment were among the most answered, those regarding bowel movement and sexual satisfaction received fewest responses. Overall, the scores from questionnaires and symptoms correlated positively. Scoring correlation could also be shown across the subgroups divided by gender, age groups, type of MS, and time since diagnosis of the disease. Conclusion Scores recorded from traditional PRO questionnaires can be reflected more easily as a trend in a simplified scale using smileys. Nevertheless, traditional questionnaires are needed to also maintain a more objective assessment. In conclusion, the patient will benefit most from an adaptive combination of regular traditional PRO questionnaire assessments and simplified symptom recording.

Background: Real-word evidence from diverse data sources is increasingly important in terms of generating rapid insights to effectively manage patient populations, especially during major public health disruptions such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Patients with chronic and inflammatory diseases -such as multiple sclerosis (MS) -were reported to experience potentially negative effects due to the use of immunosuppressive drugs in combi-nation with a COVID-19 infection. In this research, we explored the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medication use in patients with MS in Germany.Methods: Patient-level pharmacy dispensing data from the Permea platform -covering approximately 44% of all community pharmacy dispensing in Germany -were analysed from 2019 -2021. Longitudinal use patterns of MS medication and antidepressants and patient demographics were assessed. Daily variation in MS medication use was specifically studied around the dates of the first and second lockdowns in Germany.Results: We included data from 539,400 prescriptions which included at least 1 MS drug. The medication data showed a stable level of monthly prescriptions for MS medication at 2.02 +/- 0.03 prescriptions per pharmacy during the study period. Although there was a sharp increase in daily prescriptions before the first lockdown (from an average 660.08 +/- 137.59 daily prescriptions in the observed period to a maximum dispensing number of 998 daily prescriptions), the overall number of prescriptions remained at pre-pandemic levels (603 +/- 90.31 daily prescriptions in 2019). Similar trends were observed for monthly co-prescribed antidepressant use per pharmacy (0.10 +/- 0.01 in 2019-0.11 +/- 0.02 in 2020).Conclusion: Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of MS medications and co-prescribed antidepressants was stable. These insights from real-world data demonstrate the value of evidence-based insights for managing patient care.

INTRODUCTION:Real-world evidence (RWE) data is increasingly important to generate rapid insights to effectively manage patient populations. Disruptions like the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic may negatively impact the choice of medications used for managing chronic diseases such as psoriasis (PSO). Here, we explored the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the sales volumes of treatment guideline-based PSO medication in Germany.METHODS:Patient-level pharmacy dispensing data from the Permea platform, covering approximately 44% of all community pharmacy dispensing in Germany, were analysed from 2019 through to 2021. Patient demographics and PSO indicated medication sales were assessed specifically before and during the pandemic in Germany.RESULTS:We included 6,865,852 sold PSO related drugs from April 2019 to March 2021. Medication sales increased during the pandemic compared with before the pandemic for treatment classes of first-line biological and second-line drugs. The increase was observed across all age groups, but monthly variations could not be detected. Furthermore, we observed increased sales in first-line biological and second-line medications when comparing low to high COVID-19 incidence state.CONCLUSION:Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic the PSO indicated medication sales increased for first-line biological and second-line treatment. This shows that despite the pandemic impact, there continues to be an increase in sales volume for biologics. Only German federal states with intermittently very high COVID-19 incidences show a stagnation in sales volume. The reasons for this need to be investigated in further studies to possibly gain a better understanding of the concerns and uncertainties of patients with PSO.

Background:Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease which primarily affects the axial skeleton resulting in chronic back pain and stiffness. According to the guideline, the first-line treatment includes non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and non-pharmacological treatment. Second line treatment involves biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) such as tumour necrosis factor and interleukin-17 inhibitors. Objectives:The aim of this social media listening research project was to analyse switches of medication and the reasons thereof to gain valuable insights into real-life journeys of patients suffering from axSpA. Methods:Publicly available posts in German-speaking disease-specific forums were scanned for disease-specific keywords and commonly used drugs by axSpA patients on the Permea platform. Posts containing at least two key words were selected and switches between medications were manually labelled. A total of 287 scraped posts between 01 July 2010 and 04 Feb 2022 were analysed. Results:The largest group of described medication switches was initially using bDMARDs. Switches to a different bDMARD, termination of medication and switches to glucocorticoids were most frequently named. Patients on NSAIDs switched to glucocorticoids, a different NSAID or bDMARD, whereas patients on csDMARDs most frequently changed to bDMARDs. In all medication groups the main reason for switching was insufficient efficacy and side effects. Additionally, for the medication groups bDMARDs, csDMARDs and corticosteroids, pregnancy and lactation were given as a reason for switching, whereas patients in the NSAID group never mentioned pregnancy and breastfeeding as a reason for switching treatment. Conclusion:Our analysis shows medication switches based on real-life patient experiences shared with peers in a social listening setting. We also show medication switches differing from advised guidelines. Gathering real-life insights into patients' journey dealing with chronic diseases allows us to understand, and thereby improve patient care and treatment.

Abstract Objective Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency offers some protection against malaria; however, the degree of protection is poorly described and likely to vary with G6PD genotype and Plasmodium species. We present a novel approach to quantify the differential invasion rates of P. falciparum between G6PD deficient and normal red blood cells (RBCs) in an ex vivo model. A flow-cytometry based assay was developed to distinguish G6PD deficient and normal, parasitized and non-parasitized RBCs within the same sample. Venous blood collected from a G6PD heterozygous female was infected and cultured ex vivo with a laboratory strain of P. falciparum (FC27). Results Aliquots of infected blood were assayed at schizont and subsequent synchronized ring stages. At schizont stage, 84.9% of RBCs were G6PD deficient of which 0.4% were parasitized compared to 2.0% of normal RBCs. In the subsequent ring stage, 90.4% of RBCs were deficient and 0.2% of deficient and 0.9% of normal cells respectively were parasitized. The pooled Odds Ratio for a deficient RBC to be parasitized was 0.2 (95% confidence interval: 0.18–0.22, p < 0.001) compared to a normal cell. Further studies are warranted to explore preferential parasitization with different G6PD variants and Plasmodium species.

Background Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is a common enzyme deficiency, prevalent in many malaria-endemic countries. G6PD-deficient individuals are susceptible to hemolysis during oxidative stress, which can occur from exposure to certain medications, including 8-aminoquinolines used to treat Plasmodium vivax malaria. Accordingly, access to point-of-care (POC) G6PD testing in Brazil is critical for safe treatment of P. vivax malaria. Methodology/Principal findings This study evaluated the performance of the semi-quantitative, POC STANDARD G6PD Test (SD Biosensor, Republic of Korea). Participants were recruited at clinics and through an enriched sample in Manaus and Porto Velho, Brazil. G6PD and hemoglobin measurements were obtained from capillary samples at the POC using the STANDARD and HemoCue 201+ (HemoCue AB, Sweden) tests. A thick blood slide was prepared for malaria microscopy. At the laboratories, the STANDARD and HemoCue tests were repeated on venous samples and a quantitative spectrophotometric G6PD reference assay was performed (Pointe Scientific, Canton, MI). G6PD was also assessed by fluorescent spot test. In Manaus, a complete blood count was performed. Samples were analyzed from 1,736 participants. In comparison to spectrophotometry, the STANDARD G6PD Test performed equivalently in determining G6PD status in venous and capillary specimens under varied operating temperatures. Using the manufacturer-recommended reference value thresholds, the test’s sensitivity at the <30% threshold on both specimen types was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] venous 93.6%–100.0%; capillary 93.8%–100.0%). Specificity was 98.6% on venous specimens (95% CI 97.9%–99.1%) and 97.8% on capillary (95% CI 97.0%–98.5%). At the 70% threshold, the test’s sensitivity was 96.9% on venous specimens (95% CI 83.8%–99.9%) and 94.3% on capillary (95% CI 80.8%–99.3%). Specificity was 96.5% (95% CI 95.0%–97.6%) and 92.3% (95% CI 90.3%–94.0%) on venous and capillary specimens, respectively. Conclusion/Significance The STANDARD G6PD Test is a promising tool to aid in POC detection of G6PD deficiency in Brazil. Trial registration This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT04033640).

Certain clinical indications and treatments such as the use of rasburicase in cancer therapy and 8-aminoquinolines for Plasmodium vivax malaria treatment would benefit from a point-of-care test for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. Three studies were conducted to evaluate the performance of one such test: the STANDARD™ G6PD Test (SD BIOSENSOR, South Korea). First, biological interference on the test performance was evaluated in specimens with common blood disorders, including high white blood cell (WBC) counts. Second, the test precision on fingerstick specimens was evaluated against five individuals of each, deficient, intermediate, and normal G6PD activity status. Third, clinical performance of the test was evaluated at three point-of-care settings in the United States. The test performed equivalently to the reference assay in specimens with common blood disorders. High WBC count blood samples resulted in overestimation of G6PD activity in both the reference assay and the STANDARD G6PD Test. The STANDARD G6PD Test showed good precision on multiple fingerstick specimens from the same individual. The same G6PD threshold values (U/g Hb) were applied for a semiquantitative interpretation for fingerstick- and venous-derived results. The sensitivity/specificity values (95% confidence intervals) for the test for G6PD deficiency were 100 (92.3-100.0)/97 (95.2-98.2) and 100 (95.7-100.0)/97.4 (95.7-98.5) for venous and capillary specimens, respectively. The same values for females with intermediate (> 30% to ≤ 70%) G6PD activity were 94.1 (71.3-99.9)/88.2 (83.9-91.7) and 82.4 (56.6-96.2)/87.6(83.3-91.2) for venous and capillary specimens, respectively. The STANDARD G6PD Test enables point-of-care testing for G6PD deficiency.

Malaria antigen detection through rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) is widely used to diagnose malaria and estimate prevalence. To support more sensitive next-generation RDT development and screen asymptomatic malaria, we developed and evaluated the Q-Plex (TM) Human Malaria Array (Quansys Biosciences, Logan, UT), which quantifies the antigens commonly used in RDTs-Plasmodium falciparum-specific histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2), P. falciparum-specific lactate dehydrogenase (Pf LDH), Plasmodium vivax-specific LDH (Pv LDH), and Pan malaria lactate dehydrogenase (Pan LDH), and human C-reactive protein (CRP), a biomarker of severity in malaria. At threshold levels yielding 99.5% or more diagnostic specificity, diagnostic sensitivities against polymerase chain reaction-confirmed malaria for HRP2, Pf LDH, Pv LDH, and Pan LDH were 92.7%, 71.5%, 46.1%, and 83.8%, respectively. P. falciparum culture strains and samples from Peru indicated that HRP2 and Pf LDH combined improves detection of P. falciparum parasites with hrp2 and hrp3 deletions. This array can be used for antigen-based malaria screening and detecting hrp2/3 deletion mutants of P. falciparum.

Malaria burden in Zambia has significantly declined over the last decade because of improved coverage of several key malaria interventions (e.g., vector control, case management, bed net distributions, and enhanced surveillance/responses). Campaign-based mass drug administration (MDA) and focal MDA (fMDA) were assessed in a trial in Southern Province, Zambia, to identify its utility in elimination efforts. As part of the study, a longitudinal cohort was visited and tested (by PCR targeting the 18s rRNA and a Plasmodium falciparum-specific rapid diagnostic test [RDT] from SD Bioline) every month for the trial duration (18 months). Overall, there was high concordance (> 97%) between the PCR and RDT results, using the PCR as the gold standard. The RDTs had high specificity and negative predictive values (98.5% and 98.6%, respectively) but low sensitivity (53.0%) and a low positive predictive value (53.8%). There was evidence for persistent antigenemia affecting the low specificity of the RDT, while false-negative RDTs were associated with a lower parasite density than true positive RDTs. Plasmodium falciparum was the dominant species identified, with 98.3% of all positive samples containing P. falciparum. Of these, 97.5% were mono-infections and 0.8% coinfections with one other species. Plasmodium malariae was found in 1.4% of all positive samples (50% mono-infections and 50% coinfections with P. falciparum), whereas Plasmodium ovale was found in 1.1% of all positive samples (90% mono-infections and 10% coinfections with P. falciparum). Although MDA/fMDA appeared to reduce P. malariae prevalence, P. ovale prevalence appeared unchanged.

In low- and middle-income countries, many women experience anemia during pregnancy due to insufficient dietary intake of key micronutrients, parasitic infections, hemoglobinopathies, and chronic infections. Maternal anemia increases perinatal risks for both mothers and infants, and slow progress to reduce the prevalence may be due in part to the lack of affordable tools to quantify hemoglobin levels in antenatal care (ANC) clinics. A simple, inexpensive, accurate, and robust diagnostic is needed to measure hemoglobin in ANC. This study evaluated the performance and usability of the TrueHb Hemometer. A cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study was conducted to compare the accuracy of the TrueHb and the HemoCue® 201+ using capillary samples. Next, analytical performance (precision, coefficient of variation, R2) of the TrueHb was evaluated in varying environmental conditions using linearity panels with serial dilutions of venous blood samples. Lastly, the usability of the TrueHb Hemometer was assessed across three domains (effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction) by 20 ANC providers in Ghana. Capillary blood test results were not well correlated (R2 = 0.35) between the TrueHB and HemoCue201+, but 80% of TrueHb measurements were within +/-1.0 g/dl of the HemoCue® 201+ hemoglobin values. Precision tests indicated similar mean values across the three environmental conditions (CV<6%). At 21°C, the TrueHb follows a linear relationship (R2≥0.96) but does not generate accurate readings below 4.0 g/dl. At 30°C and 37°C, the TrueHb follows a linear relationship (R2 > 0.90) but begins to underestimate the hemoglobin concentration below 7.0 g/dl. The usability study identified potential failure modes due to inadequate instructions and device feedback. With some modifications, both to the product and to the instructions for use, the TrueHb may be suitable for use in ANC settings to help fill the diagnostic gap for anemia screening during pregnancy. Further testing is required with anemic populations in LMIC settings.

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors flagged an error concerning a reference to a product in the Methods section.

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency, a common genetic blood condition, can result in kernicterus at birth, and later in life as severe hemolysis on exposure to certain infections, foods, and drugs. The unavailability of point-of-care tests for G6PD deficiency is a barrier to routine curative treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria with 8-aminoquinolines, such as primaquine. Two quantitative reference tests (Trinity Biotech, Bray, Ireland and Pointe Scientific, Canton, MI; Cat No. G7583) and the point-of-care STANDARD (TM) G6PD test (SD Biosensor, Suwon, South Korea) were evaluated. The STANDARD G6PD test was evaluated at multiple temperatures, in anticoagulated venous and capillary samples, including 79 G6PD-deficient and 66 intermediate samples and across two laboratories, one in the United States and one in Thailand. The STANDARD test performed equivalently to a reference assay for its ability to diagnose G6PD deficiency (<30% normal) with a sensitivity of 100%(0.95 confidence interval [CI]: 95.7-100) and specificity of 97% (0.95 CI: 94.5-98.5), and could reliably identify females with less than 70% normal G6PD activity with a sensitivity of 95.5% (0.95 CI: 89.7-98.5) and specificity of 97% (0.95 CI: 94.5-98.6). The STANDARD G6PD product represents an opportunity to diagnose G6PD deficiency equally for males and females in basic clinical laboratories in high- and low-resource settings. This quantitative point-of-care diagnostic test for G6PD deficiency can provide equal access to safe radical cure of P. vivax cases in high-and low-resource settings, for males and females and may support malaria elimination, in countries where P. vivax is endemic.