Background Elevated liver enzymes are a frequent finding in the German population. Misdiagnosis of the underlying liver disease may enhance progressive liver impairment, but data regarding the etiology and extent of fibrosis are lacking. In 2019, we established a specialized outpatient clinic where primary care physicians can refer patients with unclear hepatopathy.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES:Recent translational research indicated a bidirectional relationship between NASH (non-alcoholic steatohepatitis) and periodontitis; however, few clinical cohorts have studied this in detail. Thus we investigated this assumed association in a well-defined cohort.MATERIALS AND METHODS:Data were generated prospectively for 132 patients (32 patients with NASH and 100 unselected, consecutively collected, anonymized controls from a local dental practice): detailed periodontal parameters, i.e., pocket-probing-depths (PPD), bleeding-on-probing (BOP), plaque-index, and utilization of dental care were assessed and correlated with relevant hepatic parameters (liver stiffness via fibroscan, AST, ALT, bilirubin, and MELD-score). Gingiva samples were tested for Porphyromonas gingvalis (P.g.) and Actinobacillus actinomyctemcomitans (A.a.) by PCR.RESULTS:87.5% of NASH patients and 47% of controls suffered from moderate to severe periodontitis (p=0.01). Liver stiffness was significantly correlated with elevated PPD (p=0.02) and BOP (p=0.03). 34 % of the NASH patients did not make use of regular dental health care. In these patients, AST (p=0.04), MELD score (p<0.01), and liver stiffness (p=0.01) were significantly elevated compared to those who see a dentist regularly. The severity of NASH was not associated with the intraoral detection of P.g. and A.a.CONCLUSIONS:The present study suggests that NASH might be associated with periodontitis, irrespective of the intraoral presence of P.g. and A.a. Moreover, regular dental care utilization might mitigate the course of NASH, and patients should be reminded by their hepatologists of the importance of regular dental visits. Future studies should investigate the role of regular dental care and additional anti-inflammatory treatments of the oral cavity.

Sarcopenia, the loss of muscle mass and quality, contributes to worse clinical outcome in patients with end-stage liver disease, but its impact on short- and long-term survival remains insufficiently understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the development of computed tomography (CT) muscle parameters and their impact on short-term and long-term survival after liver transplantation. This retrospective study included patients with liver transplantation between 2011 and 2015 and a pre-transplant CT scan. Clinical characteristics, CT muscle mass and density were assessed pre-transplant, and in available CT scans at short-term (11 months) and long-term follow-up (56 months). Overall, 93/152 (61%) patients (109 male, 55 ± 10 years) suffered from sarcopenia pre-transplant. In short- (n = 50) and long-term follow-up (n = 52) the muscle mass (− 2.65 cm 2 /m 2 95% CI [− 4.52, − 0.77], p = 0.007; − 2.96 cm 2 /m 2 [− 4.7, − 1.23], p = 0.001, respectively), and muscle density (− 3 HU [− 6, − 1], p = 0.007; − 2 HU [− 4, 0], p = 0.069) decreased. Myosteatosis was associated with a higher post-transplant mortality (survival probability: 3 months 72% vs. 95%, 1 year 63% vs. 90%, 5 years 54% vs. 84%, p = 0.001), while muscle mass was not. In conclusion, muscle mass and quality did not improve after transplant. Muscle quality predicts short- and long-term survival and could help to identify a patient’s risk profile.

Background and aims: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a severe complication in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis and is associated with a poor prognosis.Identifying and preventing the application of potential trigger substances for AKI is important in the management of these patients.In this context, only insufficient data regarding the nephrotoxic potential of CT-contrast media (CM-CT) is available.Here we investigate the nephrotoxic potential of CM-CT in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis.Method: In an exploratory analysis, patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis and ascites that received a paracentesis between 2012 and 2016 at Hannover Medical School (MHH) were included.Patients with AKI or relevant interventional procedures 7 days prior to baseline were excluded from this study.Propensity score matching (PPSM) was conducted, matching for MELD score, leukocyte count, intake of diuretics, presence of diabetes and age.Results were confirmed using data from a prospective registry that collects clinical data and biosamples from patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites that underwent a paracentesis between 2016 and 2020 (validation cohort) at MHH. Analyzed end points were 28-day incidence of AKI, severe AKI and liver transplant (LTx) free survival.Furthermore, measurement of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), an early marker for AKI, was conducted in plasma-samples from the prospective cohort.Results: Overall, 140 patients were eligible for analysis in the retrospective cohort, of whom 61 patients received a CM-CT (43%).After PPSM, 51 patients with CM-CT were matched with 51 patients without CM-CT.Baseline parameters like MELD (CM-CT: 15 vs.No CM-CT: 16, p = 0.44), CRP values (CM-CT: 32 mg/dl vs.No CM-CT: 34 mg/dl, p = 0.80) and presence of infections at baseline (CM-CT: 35% vs.No CM-CT: 37%, p = 1.00) were comparable between both groups.The 28-day AKI incidence did not differ between both groups ( p = 0.56).Furthermore, LTx-free survival and incidence of severe AKI was comparable (p = 0.37 and p = 1.00).In the validation cohort, CM-CT was noted in 13 patients (11%), while 105 patients had no CM-CT (89%).Incidence of AKI and severe AKI was comparable between the groups ( p = 0.85 and p = 0.54).Finally, NGAL-levels did not differ significantly between CM-CT an no CM-CT patients (311 ng/ml vs. 266 ng/ml, p = 0.35).Conclusion: CM-CT does not increase the risk for AKI in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis.

Background & Aims: Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infections are prevalent worldwide. Various viruses have been detected in the ejaculate and can outlast the duration of viremia, indicating replication beyond the blood-testis barrier. HEV replication in diverse organs, however, is still widely misunderstood. We aimed to determine the occurrence, features and morphology of HEV in the ejaculate. Methods: The presence of HEV in testis was assessed in 12 experimentally HEV-genotype 3-infected pigs. We further tested ejaculate, urine, stool and blood from 3 chronically HEV genotype 3-infected patients and 6 immunocompetent patients with acute HEV infection by HEV-PCR. Morphology and genomic characterization of HEV particles from various human compartments were determined by HEV-PCR, density gradient measurement, immune-electron microscopy and genomic sequencing. Results: In 2 of the 3 chronically HEV-infected patients, we observed HEV-RNA (genotype 3c) in seminal plasma and semen with viral loads >2 logs higher than in the serum. Genomic sequencing showed significant differences between viral strains in the ejaculate compared to stool. Under ribavirin-treatment, HEV shedding in the ejaculate continued for >9 months following the end of viremia. Density gradient measurement and immune-electron microscopy characterized (enveloped) HEV particles in the ejaculate as intact. Conclusions: The male reproductive system was shown to be a niche of HEV persistence in chronic HEV infection. Surprisingly, sequence analysis revealed distinct genetic HEV variants in the stool and serum, originating from the liver, compared to variants in the ejaculate originating from the male reproductive system. Enveloped HEV particles in the ejaculate did not morphologically differ from serum-derived HEV particles. Lay summary: Enveloped hepatitis E virus particles could be identified by PCR and electron microscopy in the ejaculate of immunosuppressed chronically infected patients, but not in immunocompetent experimentally infected pigs or in patients with acute self-limiting hepatitis E. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association for the Study of the Liver. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Background and aims Patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) are considered to be at increased risk for mortality when acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection and subsequently developing Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). During the COVID-19 pandemic, hospitals are regarded as sites with increased risk of infection. Therefore, patient contacts are often limited to urgent indications, which could negatively affect disease monitoring. However, data regarding actual infection rates in cirrhotic patients is limited. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the incidence of COVID-19 in patients with LC with/without hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with physical presentation at our University Medical Center. Methods Patients were enrolled between 1st April and 30th June 2020 at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany. Symptoms of upper airway infection at baseline and presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (IgG/IgM/IgA) were assessed at baseline and follow-up (FU) using an Electro-chemiluminescence immunoassay (Roche Elecsys). FU visits, including liver function test, clinical assessment and symptom questionnaire, were conducted after 6-8 weeks (FU-1) and 6 months (FU-2). Prior to inclusion of the first patient, obligatory face masks and personal distance were implemented as protective measures. Results A total of 150 patients were enrolled, 23% (n = 35) also had diagnosis of HCC (median age: 64 years, range: 19-86), 69% were male. Liver function according to Child-Pugh score (CPS) was: CPS A: 46% (n = 62); CPS B: 37% (n = 50); CPS C: 17% (n = 23). Clinical symptoms indicating upper airway infection were present in 53% (n = 77): shortness of breath (n = 40) and coughing (n = 28) were the most frequent. For the 150 patients enrolled, 284 outpatient visits were registered and 33 patients were admitted to the University Medical Center during the follow-up period. After a median of 52 days, n = 110 patients completed FU-1 and n = 72 completed FU-2 after a median of 6.1 months. Only in one patient, an 80-year-old man with stable liver function (CPS A) and advanced HCC, SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected at baseline and FU-1, while antibody testing was negative in the remaining patients at baseline, FU-1 and FU-2. Conclusion The incidence of COVID-19 at our tertiary medical center during the pandemic was low in LC and HCC patients, when simple protective measures were implemented. Therefore, a routine care for patients with chronic liver diseases does not increase the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and should be maintained with protective measures.

BACKGROUND:Hepatitis E virus (HEV) has been associated with immunological phenomena. Their clinical significance, however, still needs to be clarified, that is, whether cryoglobulins or autoantibodies impact overt disease in HEV-infected individuals. To better understand, we analyzed these different immune phenomena in three cohorts, each representing different types of HEV infection.METHODS:The cohorts included: (i) immunocompetent patients with acute hepatitis E, (ii) immunosuppressed patients with chronic hepatitis E, and (iii) individuals with asymptomatic HEV infection. Together, they consisted of 57 individuals and were studied retrospectively for the presence of anti-nuclear antibodies (ANAs), cryoglobulins, and serum total IgG. They were then compared with a control cohort of 17 untreated patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.RESULTS:Thirteen (23%) were immunocompetent patients with acute hepatitis E (median alanine aminotransferase (ALT) = 872 U/L), 15 (26%) were immunosuppressed patients with chronic hepatitis E (median ALT = 137 U/L), and 29 (51%) were blood donors with asymptomatic HEV infection (median ALT = 35 U/L). Overall, 24% tested positive for elevated ANA titers of >1:160, and 11% presented with a specific ANA pattern. ANA detection was not associated with the type of HEV infection, IgG levels, sex, or age. All individuals tested negative for anti-mitochondrial antibodies, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies, liver-kidney microsomal antibodies, anti-myeloperoxidase-, and anti-proteinase-3 antibodies. Five patients (9%) tested positive for cryoglobulins. Notably, cryoglobulinemia was present in overt hepatitis E (Groups (i) and (ii); one acute and four chronic HEV infections), but was not present in any of the asymptomatic blood donors (p = 0.02). The frequency of cryoglobulins and elevated ANAs did not differ significantly between HEV and HBV/HCV patients.CONCLUSION:In line with findings on HBV and HCV infections, we frequently observed detection of ANAs (24%) and cryoglobulins (9%) in association with HEV infections. The presence of cryoglobulins was limited to patients with overt hepatitis E. We add to the findings on the immune phenomena of hepatitis E.