As soybean (Glycine max) production continues to expand in the United States and Canada, so do pathogens and pests that directly threaten soybean yield potential and economic returns for farmers. One such pathogen is the soybean cyst nematode (SCN; Heterodera glycines). SCN has traditionally been managed using SCN-resistant cultivars and rotation with nonhost crops, but the interaction of SCN with sudden death syndrome (SDS; caused by Fusarium virguliforme) in the field makes management more difficult. Nematode-protectant seed treatments have become options for SCN and SDS management. The objectives of this study were to evaluate nematode-protectant seed treatments for their effects on (i) early and full season SCN reproduction, (ii) foliar symptoms and root-rot caused by SDS, and (iii) soybean yield across environments accounting for the above factors. Using a standard protocol, field trials were implemented in 13 states and one Canadian province from 2019 to 2021 constituting 51 site-years. Six nematode-protectant seed treatment products were compared with a fungicide + insecticide base treatment and a nontreated check. Initial (at soybean planting) and final (at soybean harvest) SCN egg populations were enumerated, and SCN females were extracted from roots and counted at 30 to 35 days postplanting. Foliar disease index (FDX) and root rot caused by the SDS pathogen were evaluated, and yield data were collected for each plot. No seed treatment offered significant nematode control versus the nontreated check for in-season and full-season nematode response, no matter the initial SCN population or FDX level. Of all treatments, ILEVO (fluopyram) and Saltro (pydiflumetofen) provided more consistent increases in yield over the nontreated check in a broader range of SCN environments, even when FDX level was high.

Double-crop soybean production involves planting soybean (Glycine max) directly following winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) harvest. Frogeye leaf spot (FLS), caused by Cercospora sojina, is an important late-season foliar disease affecting soybean fields in the United States. In some instances, foliar fungicides have been used in double-crop soybean production with little to no FLS present, raising questions on the profitability of these applications. This study analyzed yield data from 25 fungicide trials across five states (Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Missouri, and Tennessee) conducted under low FLS pressure, from 2008 to 2021, on double-crop soybean. Fungicide classes evaluated in the trials included quinone outside inhibitors (QoI), demethylation inhibitors (DMI), and methyl benzimidazole carbamates (MBC) applied alone, and mixtures of chemistry classes that included DMI+succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor (SDHI), MBC+DMI, QoI+DMI, and QoI+DMI+SDHI. A network meta-analytic model estimated yield differences between fungicide-treated and nontreated plots, which ranged from -28 to 72 kg/ha among the fungicide treatments. Negative yield response values were estimated for the single fungicide classes MBC (-15.7 kg/ha) and QoI (-28.4 kg/ha). Yield difference as high as 72.8 kg/ha was estimated only for DMI+SDHI. Economic analyses indicated that, due to the lower yield responses, probabilities of breaking even were lower than 50% for all fungicide treatments, regardless of the fungicide cost or soybean sale price. Therefore, the low yield responses associated with foliar fungicides in low-disease environments linked to the higher risk of not offsetting the costs, suggest that growers should consider disease risk prior to making the fungicide application.

Frogeye leaf spot (FLS), caused by Cercospora sojina, is an important foliar disease affecting soybean in the United States. A meta-analytic approach including 39 fungicide trials conducted from 2012 to 2021 across eight states (Alabama, Arkansas, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee) was used to assess the relationship between FLS severity and soybean yield. Correlation and regression analyses were performed separately to determine Fisher’s transformation of correlation coefficients (Z r ), intercept (β 0 ) and slope (β 1 ). Disease pressure (low severity, ≤34.5; high severity, >34.5%) and yield class (low, ≤3,352; high, >3,352 kg/ha) were included as categorical moderators. Pearson’s [Formula: see text], obtained from back-transforming the [Formula: see text] r estimated by an overall random-effects model, showed a significant negative linear relationship between FLS severity and yield ([Formula: see text] = −0.60). The [Formula: see text] r was affected by disease pressure (P = 0.0003) but not by yield class (P = 0.8141). A random-coefficient model estimated a slope of −19 kg/ha for each percent severity for a mean attainable yield of 3,719.9 kg/ha. Based on the overall mean (95% CI) of the intercept and slope estimated by the random-coefficients model, the estimated overall relative damage coefficient was 0.51% (0.36 to 0.69), indicating that a percent increase in FLS severity reduced yield by 0.51%. The best model included yield class as a covariate, and population-average intercepts differed significantly between low (3,455.1 kg/ha) and high (3,842.7 kg/ha) yield classes. This highlights the potential impact of FLS on soybean yield if not managed and may help in disease management decisions.

Frogeye leaf spot (FLS), caused by Cercospora sojina, is an economically important disease of soybean in the United States. Data from 66 uniform fungicide trials (UFTs) conducted from 2012 to 2021 across eight states (Alabama, Arkansas, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Tennessee) were gathered and analyzed to determine the efficacy and profitability of the following fungicides applied at the beginning pod developmental stage (R3): azoxystrobin + difenoconazole (AZOX + DIFE), difenoconazole + pydiflumetofen (DIFE + PYDI), pyraclostrobin (PYRA), pyraclostrobin + fluxapyroxad + propiconazole (PYRA + FLUX + PROP), tetraconazole (TTRA), thiophanate-methyl (TMET), thiophanate-methyl + tebuconazole (TMET + TEBU), and trifloxystrobin + prothioconazole (TFLX + PROT). A network meta-analytic model was fitted to the log of the means of FLS severity data and to the nontransformed mean yield for each treatment, including the nontreated. The percent reduction in disease severity (%) and the yield response (kg/ha) relative to the nontreated was the lowest for PYRA (11%; 136 kg/ha) and the greatest for DIFE + PYDI (57%; 441 kg/ha). A significant decline in efficacy over time was detected for PYRA (18 percentage points [p.p.]), TTRA (27 p.p.), AZOX + DIFE (18 p.p.), and TMET + TEBU (19 p.p.) by using year as a continuous covariate in the model. Finally, probabilities of breaking even were the greatest (>65%) for the most effective fungicide DIFE + PYDI and the lowest (<55%) for PYRA. Results of this meta-analysis may be useful to support decisions when planning fungicide programs.

A 2021 epidemic of tar spot of corn caused by Phyllachora maydis led to significant yield losses in the midwestern United States and Ontario, Canada. Uniform fungicides trials consisting of nine foliar fungicides applied at the tassel (VT) or silk (R1) growth stage were evaluated for tar spot management in five field trials in the midwestern United States and Ontario, Canada, in 2021. All nine foliar fungicide treatments significantly reduced tar spot severity, but only Delaro Complete (prothioconazole + fluopyram + trifloxystrobin), Revytek (mefentrifluconazole + pyraclostrobin + fluxapyroxad), and Veltyma (mefentrifluconazole + pyraclostrobin) protected yield compared with the nontreated control.

Random-effect meta-analyses were performed on data from 240 field trials conducted between 2005 and 2018 across nine U.S. states and Ontario, Canada, to quantify the yield response of soybean after application of foliar fungicides at beginning pod (R3) stage. Meta-analysis showed that the overall mean yield response when fungicide was used compared with not applying a fungicide was 2.7% (110 kg/ha). Moderator variables were also investigated and included fungicide group, growing season, planting date, and base yield, which all significantly influenced the yield response. There was also evidence that precipitation from the time of planting to the R3 growth stage influenced yield when fungicide was used (P = 0.059). Fungicides containing a premix of active ingredients from multiple groups (either two or three ingredients) increased the yield by 3.0% over not applying a fungicide. The highest and lowest yield responses were observed in 2005 and 2007, respectively. Better yield response to fungicides (a 3.0% increase) occurred when soybean crops were planted not later than 21 May and when total precipitation between planting and the R3 application date was above historic averages. Temperatures during the season did not influence the yield response. Yield response to fungicide was higher (a 4.7% increase) in average yield category (no spray control yield 2,878 to 3,758 kg/ha) and then gradually decreased with increasing base yield. Partial economic analyses indicated that use of foliar fungicides is less likely to be profitable when foliar diseases are absent or at low levels.

As complete host resistance in soybean has not been achieved, Sclerotinia stem rot (SSR) caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum continues to be of major economic concern for farmers. Thus, chemical control remains a prevalent disease management strategy. Pesticide evaluations were conducted in Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, and Wisconsin from 2009 to 2016, for a total of 25 site-years (n = 2,057 plot-level data points). These studies were used in network metaanalyses to evaluate the impact of 10 popular pesticide active ingredients, and seven common application timings on SSR control and yield benefit, compared with not treating with a pesticide. Boscalid and picoxystrobin frequently offered the best reductions in disease severity and best yield benefit (P < 0.0001). Pesticide applications (oneor two-spray programs) made during the bloom period provided significant reductions in disease severity index (DIX) (P < 0.0001) and led to significant yield benefits (P = 0.0009). Data from these studies were also used in nonlinear regression analyses to determine the effect of DIX on soybean yield. A three-parameter logistic model was found to best describe soybean yield loss (pseudo-R-2 = 0.309). In modern soybean cultivars, yield loss due to SSR does not occur until 20 to 25% DIX, and considerable yield loss (-697 kg ha(-1) or -10 bu acre(-1)) is observed at 68% DIX. Further analyses identified several pesticides and programs that resulted in greater than 60% probability for return on investment under high disease levels.

Management of Fusarium graminearum-associated mycotoxins in wheat grain has been extensively evaluated, but little is known about management of mycotoxins in straw. Two research trials were conducted at four locations from 2011 to 2014. The objective of the first trial was to determine the efficacy of fungicides, and the objective of the second trial was to evaluate the use of integrated disease management strategies, for the control of Fusarium head blight (FHB) and reducing the concentration of the Fusarium mycotoxins deoxynivalenol, 3-acetyl-deoxynivalenol, and 15-acetyl-deoxynivalenol in straw. In the first trial, it was determined that demethylation inhibitor (DMI) fungicides did not offer significant (P ≤ 0.05) reductions of mycotoxin concentrations in the straw compared with a no-fungicide control treatment, but significant (P ≤ 0.05) reductions in mycotoxin concentration were observed in the control when compared with treatments with the application of quinone outside inhibitor (QoI)-containing fungicides. In the second trial, mycotoxin concentrations in the straw were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) reduced in the moderately resistant cultivar compared with the susceptible cultivar, but were not affected by the use of a fungicide. The practices typically used to manage Fusarium mycotoxins in wheat grain, especially the selection of resistant cultivars and not using a QoI fungicide, may be an effective means to reduce mycotoxin concentrations in the straw.

Core Ideas A foliar fungicide applied at the corn tasseling stage can reduce stalk rot severity but is likely related to control of foliar diseases. If corn harvest is delayed, stalk rot severity can increase. Corn hybrids with resistance to gray leaf spot may have reduced stalk rot compared with susceptible hybrids. The use of foliar‐applied fungicides on corn (Zea mays) in the United States has been heralded as a way to improve stalk health. Our goal was to provide evidence whether the use of pyraclostrobin fungicide provided benefits beyond managing foliar diseases of corn, such as gray leaf spot (caused by Cercospora zeae‐maydis). Field trials evaluating the response of four corn hybrids at two harvest times to the foliar application of pyraclostrobin fungicide applied at tassel stage were conducted near Champaign, IL in three consecutive years (2008–2010). The selected corn hybrids were either susceptible (‘H‐8838’ and ‘H‐8939’) or moderately resistant (‘H‐8852’ and ‘H‐8953’) to gray leaf spot. In addition, each set of hybrids represented “sister” lines, with H‐8939 and H‐8953 containing transgenic Bt traits for European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis) and corn rootworm (Diabrotica spp.) control. Plots were harvested at two different times when seed moisture concentration was approximately 25% or 3 to 4 weeks later. Stalk health was evaluated immediately prior to harvest by splitting the stalks open and visually rating stalk rot using a 0 to 5 severity scale. In general, corn hybrids that were susceptible to gray leaf spot had greater stalk rot severity than those that were moderately resistant to gray leaf spot. Within “sister” lines, no stalk rot differences were observed between Bt and non‐Bt hybrids. Stalk rot severity generally was greater at the second harvest date compared with the first harvest date. In general, plots treated with pyraclostrobin had reduced stalk rot severity compared with non‐treated plots.

Effective control of Fusarium-mycotoxin accumulation in grain affected by Fusarium head blight (FHB) (caused by Fusarium graminearum) begins with selecting moderately resistant wheat cultivars; however, little is known about how this resistance affects mycotoxin levels in the stem. A study was conducted from 2011 to 2014 in a mist-irrigated FHB nursery in Urbana, IL to determine whether the FHB resistance class of a cultivar (very susceptible, susceptible, moderately susceptible, and moderately resistant) affects the concentration of Fusarium mycotoxins in the stem. FHB incidence, FHB severity, and Fusarium-damaged kernel ratings were collected and used to calculate FHB index; incidence, severity, and kernel damage (ISK) index; and deoxynivalenol (DON), incidence, severity, and kernel damage (DISK) index. Grain was assayed for levels of DON, and the bottom 25 cm of plant stems was collected from each plot and assayed for DON, 3-acetyl-deoxynivalenol (3ADON), and 15-acetyl-deoxynivalenol (15ADON). Significant differences in DON concentration in the grain were detected among cultivars (P = 0.0001) and for the concentration of all DON (P = 0.003), 3ADON (P = 0.03), and 15ADON (P < 0.0001) in the stem. Significant differences among resistance classes were observed for FHB index value (P < 0.0001), ISK index (P = 0.006), and DISK index (P = 0.004). In all years of this study, the concentration of DON in the grain and the concentrations of all mycotoxins in the stem were consistently lower in the moderately resistant cultivars. All three indices were poor indicators of mycotoxin concentrations in the stem. Overall, the selection of a moderately resistant cultivar provides effective control of DON accumulation in the grain and mycotoxin accumulation in the stem.

Foliar disease and insect management on soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) in the North Central region of the United States has been increasingly accomplished through foliar fungicide and insecticide application. Data from research trials conducted in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, and Nebraska were compiled from 2008 to 2014 to determine the impact of fungicide, insecticide, and fungicide + insecticide applications on soybean yield and profitability. In each state, field experiments occurred each year in two to seven locations. All treatments were applied at the R3 growth stage. Disease and insect pressure were very low in all states and years. A foliar application of fungicide, insecticide, or the combination, increased yield in seven out of 14 total site-years (P < 0.10). Economic analysis using an average soybean price of $0.42 per kilogram and average application cost of $62 per hectare indicated that fungicide applications were only profitable in 14% of the trial site-years. Insecticide alone and fungicide + insecticide was profitable in 39% and 45% of site-years, respectively. Effect of fungicide class on yield was inconsistent. Our results indicate that although yield increases can occur with foliar fungicide and/or insecticide treatments, current market prices and application costs may limit profitability when disease and/or insect pressure is low. Accepted for publication 22 September 2016.

Goss's wilt and leaf blight, caused by Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. nebraskensis (Cmn), is a re-emerging disease of corn (Zea mays) in portions of the midwestern USA. Although resistant corn hybrids have been developed for some regions, the availability of adapted resistant hybrids may be limited in other areas; therefore, chemical control could potentially serve as an interim control measure while resistant hybrids are being developed. A field experiment was initiated to evaluate the effect of copper hydroxide and citric acid on Goss's wilt severity and yield of corn. Chemicals were applied relative to inoculation with Cmn, and non-inoculated plots also were included. Treatments not inoculated with Cmn had significantly (P <= 0.05) lower Goss's wilt severity values compared with those that were inoculated, but no significant differences among treatments within Cmn-inoculated or within non-inoculated plots were observed. Neither Cmn-inoculation nor chemicals applied had a significant effect on corn yield. Overall, corn yields were reduced by approximately 9% in Cmn-inoculated plots compared with non-inoculated plots. From our research, application of copper hydroxide or citric acid was not a viable Goss's wilt management practice. Therefore, corn growers should continue to rely on cultural practices such as crop rotation and tillage to limit Cmn inoculum in fields, and grow resistant hybrids if they are available.

Sudden death syndrome (SDS), caused by Fusarium virguliforme (Fv), is a major yield-limiting disease of soybean in North America. Infection of soybean seedling roots by Fv results in severe root damage; therefore, fungicide seed treatments could potentially reduce these early-season infections and reduce severity of foliar symptoms that typically occur later in the season. Multiple fungicide seed treatment combinations were evaluated for their effects on Fv infection, DNA concentrations in roots, soybean root development, and SDS development in the field, greenhouse and laboratory trials. Several seed treatments decreased root disease symptoms compared with the non-treated inoculated control in the laboratory assay, and the biological seed treatment, Bacillus pumilus, significantly decreased seedling development and increased SDS root disease compared with the non-treated inoculated control. In the greenhouse, Fv DNA concentrations in roots were reduced by a treatment combining mefenoxam + thiophanate-methyl + azoxystrobin + Bacillus pumilus + prothioconazole + fludioxonil compared with the non-treated control; however, the reduction in Fv DNA did not improve root growth or decrease SDS symptoms compared with the non-treated control. Field trials were conducted in Valmeyer, IL in 2008 and in Urbana, IL in 2008 and 2009. Seed treatments had no effect on the concentration of Fv DNA in soybean roots and had very little effect on root morphology. At the Valmeyer location, most seed treatments significantly decreased SDS symptoms compared with the control. In summary, no consistent, significant effects of the seed treatments evaluated in this study on SDS or Fv root infection were observed. Therefore, soybean growers should continue to utilize other practices for SDS management until new seed treatments with consistent efficacy in controlling SDS are available.