Trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonists are being investigated as potential new treatments for schizophrenia, a disorder characterized by striatal hyperdopaminergia and dysregulated cortical and hippocampal glutamatergic function. Current evidence suggests that TAAR1 agonists reduce elevated striatal dopamine synthesis capacity and release, likely through direct inhibition of presynaptic dopaminergic neurons and modulation of upstream glutamatergic signaling. However, their impact on postsynaptic striatal neuronal dynamics and associated behaviors remains largely unexplored. Here we investigated the effects of TAAR1 agonists, RO5166017 and clinical drug candidate ulotaront, on in vivo calcium dynamics of D1- and D2-receptor expressing medium spiny neurons (MSNs) in freely behaving mice, under normal and phencyclidine (PCP)-induced, psychosis-like conditions. Both ulotaront and RO5166017 mitigated PCP-induced alterations in locomotor behavior, MSN activity levels and spatiotemporal dynamics. Interestingly, the neural effects were dependent on both locomotor activity and the psychosis-like state. While ulotaront and RO5166017 differentially affected neuronal activity levels under normal conditions, they both produced a similar increase in the PCP state, specifically during movement, with comparable effects observed in D1 and D2 MSNs. Although the established antipsychotics haloperidol and clozapine produced similar behavioral effects, their impact on striatal MSNs was distinct and lacked prominent state dependence. These findings provide new insights into the distinct neurocircuit changes associated with the antipsychotic-like effects of TAAR1 agonists, distinguishing them from D2 receptor-targeting treatments.
Experience-dependent modulation of the visual evoked potential (VEP) can be used as a non-invasive human correlate of invasive measurements of long-term potentiation (LTP)-type neuroplasticity in animal research. However, conventional electroencephalogram (EEG) recording is high burden and time consuming, hindering adoption. Further, reliability of participant-level VEP modulation measures, even in highly controlled conditions, has been disappointing. To increase the practicality and utility of the assessment we trialled a short (11-min) paradigm with wireless dry-EEG headset and applied multiscale frequency-domain analyses to extract more precise measures of neuroplasticity. This approach was tested in healthy participants in laboratory (n = 17) and Phase 1 clinical studies (n = 33). Typical session duration was < 30 min. Test–retest reliability of VEP waveforms were compared to literature on full-length paradigms with wet-EEG hardware. Group-level time-domain event-related potential (ERP) analyses showed post-modulation P1 amplitude increase in both groups (Cohen’s d = 0.77, 0.78, respectively) and N1b amplitude decrease in clinical study group (Cohen’s d = − 0.52). Timeseries-based test–retest reliability of the VEP modulation effect was low but was substantially improved to moderate levels (some intraclass correlation ≥ 0.5) with a wavelet-based analysis. This suggests that VEP modulation assessments could be employed across multiple sites to objectively measure experience-dependent plasticity in real-world clinical trials of central nervous system therapies.
Currently, placebo-controlled clinical trials report mean change and effect sizes, which masks information about heterogeneity of treatment effects (HTE). Here, we present a method to estimate HTE and evaluate the null hypothesis (H0) that a drug has equal benefit for all participants (HTE=0). We developed measure termed 'estimated heterogeneity of treatment effect' or eHTE, which estimates variability in drug response by comparing distributions between study arms. This approach was tested across numerous large placebo-controlled clinical trials. In contrast with variance-based methods which have not identified heterogeneity in psychiatric trials, reproducible instances of treatment heterogeneity were found. For example, heterogeneous response was found in a trial of venlafaxine for depression (peHTE=0.034), and two trials of dasotraline for binge eating disorder (Phase 2, peHTE=0.002; Phase 3, 4mg peHTE=0.011; Phase 3, 6mg peHTE=0.003). Significant response heterogeneity was detected in other datasets as well, often despite no difference in variance between placebo and drug arms. The implications of eHTE as a clinical trial outcomes independent from central tendency of the group is considered and the important of the eHTE method and results for drug developers, providers, and patients is discussed.
INTRODUCTION:Dasotraline is an investigational inhibitor of dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake transporters that has completed pivotal studies in Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Binge Eating Disorder (BED). Preclinical studies show dasotraline is well absorbed, well distributed, and highly metabolized in animal models, though absorption is prolonged with slow overall elimination in humans. Dasotraline is a substrate of multiple Cytochrome P450s (CYP). The metabolism of dasotraline is largely determined by CYP2B6 (fraction of metabolism fm: 0.63) and, to a lesser extent, by CYP2D6 (fm: 0.12), CYP2C19 (fm: 0.11), and CYP3A4/5 (fm: 0.14). Dasotraline is not a CYP inducer but is an inhibitor of CYP2B6, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4/5. METHODS:A dasotraline PBPK model was established by a middle-out approach based on in vitro and clinical results. Simulations were performed to evaluate CYP-mediated drugdrug interactions (DDI) with dasotraline as a victim and perpetrator, the impact of polymorphic CYP2B6 on dasotraline PK, as well as the role CYP2B6 autoinhibition on dasotraline accumulation at steady state. RESULTS:The PBPK model well described clinically observed PK not only after a single dose, but also predicted substantial accumulation of dasotraline due to auto-inhibition of CYP2B6-mediated clearance. In addition, the simulated CYP2B6-mediated DDI precisely depicted the clinically observed DDI. Although hepatic elimination of dasotraline is primarily mediated by CYP2B6, simulations suggest that the impact of CYP2B6 polymorphism on pharmacokinetics is minimal, likely due to compensatory auto-inhibition of the enzyme. As a result, dose adjustment based on CYP2B6 phenotype is likely unnecessary. DISCUSSION:A PBPK model was developed via the middle-out approach to predict CYPmediated DDI with dasotraline as either a victim or a perpetrator and the impact of polymorphic CYP2B6 on dasotraline PK. The PBPK model was developed assuming the hepatic metabolism of dasotraline is only determined by CYP enzymes based on the in vitro studies. Although the minor contribution of non-CYP enzymes may not be ruled out, the simulations on CYP mediated DDI with dasotraline as the victim will unlikely be significantly different. CONCLUSION:The PBPK model developed via the middle-out approach provides a quantitative tool to predict CYP-mediated DDI with dasotraline as either a victim or a perpetrator and the impact of polymorphic CYP2B6 on dasotraline PK. This model may aid in optimizing dosing strategies to minimize the risks associated with CYP-mediated interactions and significant accumulation following repeated dosing.
Ketamine is noted for its rapid onset antidepressant response and effectiveness in patients with treatment resistant depression. While most research has focused on glutamatergic mechanisms, recent studies show that antidepressant-like effects in rodents are dependent upon the serotonergic (5-HT) system and suggest a potential contribution of the 5-HT1B receptor. In this study we utilized CP-94253 to examine whether 5-HT1B receptor agonism produces rapid and sustained antidepressant-like effects, focusing on rodent models and treatment approaches commonly used to demonstrate the differentiated response to ketamine. We first confirmed that CP94253 is a potent 5-HT1B agonist in vitro and that CP-94253 occupies brain 5-HT1B receptors at the doses tested. CP-94253 reduced immobility in the mouse forced swim test (FST) and exhibited a prominent antidepressant signature in the mouse-behavior phenotyping platform SmartCube (R). When examined 24 h after acute treatment, CP-94253 reduced FST immobility in both na & iuml;ve rats and in rats receiving chronic interferon alpha treatment. Ex vivo hippocampal long-term potentiation was also enhanced in na & iuml;ve rats receiving acute CP-94253 treatment, 24 h prior to the recordings. In mice exposed to chronic social defeat stress, antidepressant-like effects in the tail suspension and sucrose preference tests were seen 1 h and 24 h after acute treatment, respectively. Finally, whole brain c-fos imaging in mice showed that CP-94253 modulates neuronal activity in discrete brain regions including the lateral habenula circuit implicated in depression and the ketamine treatment response. Collectively these results support the further investigation of 5-HT1B agonism as a novel treatment approach for major depressive disorder.
Nonracemic amisulpride (SEP-4199) is an investigational 85:15 ratio of aramisulpride to esamisulpride and currently in clinical trials for the treatment of bipolar depression. During testing of SEP-4199, a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) disconnect was discovered that prompted the development of a controlled-release (CR) formulation with improved therapeutic index for QT prolongation. Observations that supported the development of a CR formulation included (i) plasma concentrations of amisulpride enantiomers were cleared within 24-hours, but brain dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) occupancies, although achieving stable levels during this time, required 5 days to return to baseline; (ii) nonracemic amisulpride administered to non-human primates produced significantly greater D2R occupancies during a gradual 6-hour administration compared with a single bolus; (iii) concentration-occupancy curves were left-shifted in humans when nonracemic amisulpride was gradually administered over 3 and 6 hours compared with immediate delivery; (iv) CR solid oral dose formulations of nonracemic amisulpride were able to slow drug dissolution in vitro and reduce peak plasma exposures in vivo in human subjects. By mathematically solving for a drug distribution step into an effect compartment, and for binding to target receptors, the discovery of a novel PK/PD model (termed here as Distribution Model) accounted for hysteresis between plasma and brain, a lack of receptor saturation, and an absence of accumulation of drug occupancy with daily doses. The PK/PD disconnect solved by the Distribution Model provided model-informed drug development to continue in Phase III using the non-bioequivalent CR formulation with diminished QT prolongation as dose-equivalent to the immediate release (IR) formulation utilized in Phase II.
BACKGROUND: Striatal hyperdopaminergia is implicated in the pathoetiology of schizophrenia, but how this relates to dopaminergic midbrain activity is unclear. Neuromelanin (NM)-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging provides a marker of long-term dopamine function. We examined whether midbrain NM-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging contrast-to-noise ratio (NM-CNR) was higher in people with schizophrenia than in healthy control (HC) participants and whether this correlated with dopamine synthesis capacity. METHODS: One hundred fifty-four participants (schizophrenia group: n = 74, HC group: n = 80) underwent NM-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging of the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area (SN-VTA). A subset of the schizophrenia group (n = 38) also received [F-18]-DOPA positron emission tomography to measure dopamine synthesis capacity (K-i(cer)) in the SN-VTA and striatum. RESULTS: SN-VTA NM-CNR was significantly higher in patients with schizophrenia than in HC participants (effect size = 0.38, p = .019). This effect was greatest for voxels in the medial and ventral SN-VTA. In patients, SN-VTA K-i(cer) positively correlated with SN-VTA NM-CNR (r = 0.44, p = .005) and striatal K-i(cer) (r = 0.71, p < .001). Voxelwise analysis demonstrated that SN-VTA NM-CNR was positively associated with striatal K-i(cer) (r = 0.53, p = .005) and that this relationship seemed strongest between the ventral SN-VTA and associative striatum in schizophrenia. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that NM levels are higher in patients with schizophrenia than in HC individuals, particularly in midbrain regions that project to parts of the striatum that receive innervation from the limbic and association cortices. The direct relationship between measures of NM and dopamine synthesis suggests that these aspects of schizophrenia pathophysiology are linked. Our findings highlight specific mesostriatal circuits as the loci of dopamine dysfunction in schizophrenia and thus as potential therapeutic targets.
We sought to derive an objective measure of psychomotor slowing from speech analytics during a psychiatric interview to avoid potential burden of dedicated neurophysiological testing. Speech latency, which reflects response time between speakers, shows promise from the literature. Speech data was obtained from 274 subjects with a diagnosis of bipolar I depression enrolled in a randomized, doubleblind, 6-week phase 2 clinical trial. Audio recordings of structured Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) interviews at 6 time points were examined (k = 1,352). We evaluated speech latencies, and other aspects of speech, for temporal stability, convergent validity, sensitivity/responsivity to clinical change, and generalization across seven socio-linguistically diverse countries. Speech latency was minimally associated with demographic features, and explained nearly a third of the variance in depression (categorically defined). Speech latency significantly decreased as depression symptoms improved over time, explaining nearly 20 % of variance in depression remission. Classification for differentiating people with versus without concurrent depression was high (AUCs > 0.85) both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. Results replicated across countries. Other speech features offered modest incremental contribution. Neurophysiological speech parameters with face validity can be derived from psychiatric interviews without the added patient burden of additional testing.
Despite the rising prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), there remains a significant unmet need for pharmacotherapies addressing its core and associative symptoms. While some atypical antipsychotics have been approved for managing associated irritability and aggression, their use is constrained by substantial side effects. This study aimed firstly to develop behavioral measures to explore frustration, irritability and aggression phenotypes in the rat prenatal valproic acid (VPA) model of ASD. Additionally, we investigated the potential of two novel mechanisms, 5-HT1B and TAAR1 agonism, to alleviate these behaviors. Male offspring exposed to prenatal VPA were trained to achieve stable performance on a cued operant task, followed by pharmacological assessment in an operant frustration test, bottle brush test and resident intruder test. VPA exposed rats demonstrated behaviors indicative of frustration and irritability, as well as increased aggression compared to controls. The irritability-like behavior and aggression were further exacerbated in animals previously experiencing a frustrative event during the operant test. Single administration of the 5-HT1B agonist CP-94253 or TAAR1 agonist RO5263397 attenuated the frustration-like behavior compared to vehicle. Additionally, both agonists reduced irritability-like behavior under both normal and frustrative conditions. While CP-94253 reduced aggression in the resident intruder test under both conditions, RO5263397 only produced effects in rats that previously experienced a frustrative event. Our study describes previously uncharacterized phenotypes of frustration, irritability, and aggression in the rat prenatal VPA model of ASD. Administration of selective TAAR1 or 5-HT1B receptor agonists alleviated these deficits, warranting further exploration of both targets in ASD treatment.
Clinical drug development in psychiatry is challenging due to heterogeneous patient populations and the uncertainty of measuring neuropsychiatric constructs with symptom rating scales. Here we describe the development and implementation of an enrichment algorithm that identifies canonical versus anomalous symptom presentations, at the individual subject level, based on MADRS ratings obtained at screening and baseline. Data from 5 randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials in bipolar I disorder was used (N = 2026 subjects and 15,239 MADRS assessments). A variance-covariance difference (VCD) vector was developed to encode individual symptom structure using the 10 items of MADRS from the two sequential assessments. An anomaly score, calculated from each subject's VCD vector was derived by isolation forest to quantify the degree of disparity from the hypothesized canonical item structure. A retrospective application of the algorithm reliably identified a threshold anomaly score above which the psychometric properties of MADRS deteriorate. Consistent with increasing the certainty of MADRS ratings, subjects with a canonical symptom structure at baseline demonstrated greater effect sizes post-baseline in a phase 2 placebo-controlled trial of non-racemic amisulpride (SEP-4199) for bipolar depression, analyzed retrospectively. Our analyses show that the developed algorithm can reduce the symptom structure heterogeneity at baseline and thus improve the measurement certainty of psychiatric symptoms in clinical trials. This novel enrichment method has been prospectively implemented in a Phase 3 clinical study of SEP-4199 and is consistent with regulatory guidelines aimed at increasing the statistical power and lowering patient-burden in clinical trials. Clinical Trials Registry: NCT00868452, NCT00868699, NCT01284517, NCT01986101, NCT03543410, NCT05169710.
BACKGROUND:Metabolic syndrome (MetS), which can be induced or exacerbated by the current class of antipsychotic drugs, is highly prevalent in patients with schizophrenia and presents significant challenges to lifetime disease management. Supported by initial clinical results, trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonists have emerged as potential novel treatments for schizophrenia. Notably, non-clinical studies have also shown weight-lowering and glucoregulatory effects of TAAR1 agonists, including the investigational agent ulotaront. However, the translatability of these findings to humans has not been adequately assessed. Given that delayed gastric emptying (GE) was identified as a potential mechanism contributing to the metabolic benefits of TAAR1 agonists in rodents, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ulotaront on GE in patients with schizophrenia and concurrent MetS with prediabetes. METHODS:Patients with schizophrenia were randomized to receive a single oral dose of ulotaront (150 mg) and their previous antipsychotic (PA) in an open-label, crossover, two-sequence design (NCT05402111). Eligible participants fulfilled at least three of five MetS criteria and had prediabetes defined by elevated glycated haemoglobin (5.7-6.4%) and/or fasting homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (i.e. ≥2.22). Following an overnight fast and 4 h post-dose, participants ingested a 99mTc-sulphur colloid radiolabelled egg meal (320 kcal, 30% fat). GE was measured by scintigraphy over 4 h. Endpoints included GE of solids half-time (T1/2) and percentage gastric retention at 1, 2 and 4 h. RESULTS:Thirty-one adults were randomized and 27 completed the study. Ulotaront significantly delayed GE of solids [median GE T1/2 ulotaront at 139 min (119, 182) vs. the participant's PA of 124 min (109, 132), p = .006]. A significant increase in gastric retention was seen in the ulotaront versus the PA group at 1 h (80% vs. 75%, p = .015), 2 h (61% vs. 50%, p = .023) and 4 h (17% vs. 7%, p = .002) post-meal. CONCLUSION:Ulotaront delayed the GE of solids in patients with schizophrenia and concurrent MetS with prediabetes. Additional studies are needed to assess whether treatment with TAAR1 agonists is associated with weight loss and glucoregulatory improvement.
OBJECTIVE:Metabolic Syndrome, which can be induced or exacerbated by current antipsychotic drugs (APDs), is highly prevalent in schizophrenia patients. Recent preclinical and clinical evidence suggest that agonists at trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) have potential as a new treatment option for schizophrenia. Intriguingly, preclinical tudies have also identified TAAR1 as a novel regulator of metabolic control. Here we evaluated the effects of three TAAR1 agonists, including the clinical development candidate ulotaront, on body weight, metabolic parameters and modulation of neurocircuits implicated in homeostatic and hedonic feeding.METHODS:Effects of TAAR1 agonists (ulotaront, RO5166017 and/or RO5263397) on body weight, food intake and/or metabolic parameters were investigated in rats fed a high-fat diet (HFD) and in a mouse model of diet-induced obesity (DIO). Body weight effects were also determined in a rat and mouse model of olanzapine-, and corticosterone-induced body weight gain, respectively. Glucose tolerance was assessed in lean and diabetic db/db mice and fasting plasma glucose and insulin examined in DIO mice. Effects on gastric emptying were evaluated in lean mice and rats. Drug-induced neurocircuit modulation was evaluated in mice using whole-brain imaging of c-fos protein expression.RESULTS:TAAR1 agonists improved oral glucose tolerance by inhibiting gastric emptying. Sub-chronic administration of ulotaront in rats fed a HFD produced a dose-dependent reduction in body weight, food intake and liver triglycerides compared to vehicle controls. In addition, a more rapid reversal of olanzapine-induced weight gain and food intake was observed in HFD rats switched to ulotaront or RO5263397 treatment compared to those switched to vehicle. Chronic ulotaront administration also reduced body weight and improved glycemic control in DIO mice, and normalized corticosterone-induced body weight gain in mice. TAAR1 activation increased neuronal activity in discrete homeostatic and hedonic feeding centers located in the dorsal vagal complex and hypothalamus with concurrent activation of several limbic structures.CONCLUSION:The current data demonstrate that TAAR1 agonists, as a class, not only lack APD-induced metabolic liabilities but can reduce body weight and improve glycemic control in rodent models. The underlying mechanisms likely include TAAR1-mediated peripheral effects on glucose homeostasis and gastric emptying as well as central regulation of energy balance and food intake.
Ulotaront (SEP-363856), a dual trace animeassociated receptor 1 (TAAR1) and 5-HT1A receptor agonist, is in phase 3 clinical development for the treatment of schizophrenia. This study evaluated the comparative bioequivalence (BE) between tablet and capsule formulations of ulotaront and the food effect (FE) on pharmacokinetics (PK) of tablet form in healthy adult human subjects. The BE study applied an open-label two-period crossover design in 24 healthy volunteers. Subjects were randomly assigned (1:1) to dosing sequence AB or BA (A, 25 mg ulotaront tablet; B, 25 mg ulotaront capsule). The FE study also used an open-label randomized two-period crossover design in 20 healthy volunteers. Subjects were fasted overnight then randomly assigned (1:1) to dosing sequence AB or BA (A, fasted condition; B, fed condition). Dosing periods were separated by 1 week for both studies. Serial plasma samples from each period were collected and analyzed by LC–MS/MS. PK parameters were calculated using Phoenix WinNonlin® software. For the BE study, geometric mean ulotaront Cmax values were 93.28 and 86.98 ng/mL for tablet and capsule, respectively. Cmax ratio was 107.25 significant food effect.
Background and Objectives Ulotaront (SEP-363856) is a trace amine-associated receptor 1 agonist with 5-HT1A receptor agonist activity currently in phase 3 clinical development for the treatment of schizophrenia. In this exploratory, flexibly dosed study, ulotaront was evaluated for the treatment of Parkinson disease psychosis (PDP). Methods Patients with PDP requiring antipsychotic therapy were randomized, double-blind to ulotaront (25, 50, or 75 mg/d) or placebo. Mixed Model for Repeated Measures was used to assess change from baseline in the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms for Parkinson Disease (SAPS-PD) at 6 weeks (primary end point). Results The efficacy analysis sample comprised 38 patients (ulotaront, n = 24; placebo, n = 14). SAPS-PD total scores were numerically reduced in ulotaront-treated vs placebo-treated patients from week 1 to week 6: Least squares mean (95% confidence interval) difference in change from baseline at week 6 was −1.1 (−6.5, 4.3, p = 0.681). PDP symptom complete remission (≥100% improvement [reduction] from baseline in SAPS-PD total score) was observed in 25% of ulotaront-treated vs 0% of placebo-treated patients. SAPS-PD and Neuropsychiatric Inventory hallucinations subscales were numerically reduced vs placebo, and SAPS-PD total scores were reduced in patients with greater cognitive impairment (baseline Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] scores ≤24). Ulotaront improved Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson Disease Sleep Scale – Daytime Sleepiness scores (p = 0.022). There was no worsening of Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale Part III motor score, MMSE, or vital signs. Adverse events (≥10%) with ulotaront vs placebo included hallucinations (24% vs 14%), confusional state (20% vs 14%), dizziness (16% vs 7%), nausea (12% vs 7%), and falls (12% vs 21%). Discussion In this exploratory pilot study, ulotaront may decrease PDP symptoms without worsening motor function, particularly in patients with cognitive impairment. Trial Registration Information ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02969369; submitted: November 17, 2016; study start date: December 31, 2016. Classification of Evidence This Class II study was an exploratory pilot study that was underpowered to detect a statistically significant difference between ulotaront and placebo in the treatment of patients with Parkinson disease psychosis without worsening motor function.
AbstractIntroductionTrace amine-associated receptors (TAARs) are a family of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) first identified in 2001. TAAR1 has emerged as a promising therapeutic target due to its ability to modulate monoaminergic and glutamatergic neurotransmission. Ulotaront is a trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist with serotonin 5-HT1A agonist activity that has received FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation for the treatment of schizophrenia. Here we provide a brief review of the discovery of ulotaront and preclinical research suggesting efficacy in schizophrenia, leading to the first clinical trial of ulotaront resulting in FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation.MethodsUlotaront was discovered through a target-agnostic approach optimized to identify drug candidates that demonstrate an antipsychotic-like profile in vivo but lack D2 and 5-HT2A receptor antagonism. Ulotaront was further characterized by in vitro pharmacology, electrophysiology, behavioral, and imaging studies.ResultsUlotaront demonstrated an antipsychotic-like profile in a high-throughput, phenotypic behavior screening platform, as well as efficacy in preclinical models of schizophrenia, including phencyclidine (PCP)-induced hyperactivity, prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle, and subchronic PCP-induced deficits in social interaction. Although not fully elucidated, ulotaront’s mechanism of action appears to be mediated by agonism at trace amine-associated 1 (TAAR1) and 5-HT1A receptors. This was further corroborated with whole cell patch clamp recordings, demonstrating inhibition of dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) and ventral tegmental area (VTA) neuronal firing via 5-HT1A and TAAR1 receptors. Furthermore, ulotaront attenuated the ketamine-induced increase in striatal dopamine synthesis capacity, suggesting that it may modulate presynaptic dopamine dysfunction which is hypothesized to contribute to the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.ConclusionsPreclinical studies have identified ulotaront as a TAAR1 agonist with antipsychotic-like activity. Ulotaront’s unique receptor profile led to its designation as a member of the new “-taront” class of TAAR1 agonists, distinct in pharmacology from the D2/5-HT2A class of antipsychotics. A companion poster will summarize the efficacy and safety of ulotaront based on initial clinical trials in schizophrenia.FundingSunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
Background: Ulotaront (SEP-363856) is a novel agonist at trace amine-associated receptor 1 and sero-tonin 5-HT1A receptors in clinical development for the treatment of schizophrenia. Previous studies demonstrated ulotaront suppresses rapid eye movement (REM) sleep in both rodents and healthy vol-unteers. We assessed acute and sustained treatments of ulotaront on REM sleep and symptoms of cat-aplexy and alertness in subjects with narcolepsy-cataplexy.Methods: In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, 3-way crossover study, ulo-taront was evaluated in 16 adults with narcolepsy-cataplexy. Two oral doses of ulotaront (25 mg and 50 mg) were administered daily for 2 weeks and compared with matching placebo (6-treatment sequence, 3-period, 3-treatment). Results: Acute treatment with both 25 mg and 50 mg of ulotaront reduced minutes spent in nighttime REM compared to placebo. A sustained 2-week administration of both doses of ulotaront reduced the mean number of short-onset REM periods (SOREMPs) during daytime multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) compared to placebo. Although cataplexy events decreased from the overall mean baseline during the 2-week treatment period, neither dose of ulotaront statistically separated from placebo (p = 0.76, 25 mg; p = 0.82, 50 mg), and no significant improvement in patient and clinician measures of sleepiness from baseline to end of the 2-week treatment period occurred in any treatment group.Conclusions: Acute and sustained treatment with ulotaront reduced nighttime REM duration and day-time SOREMPs, respectively. The effect of ulotaront on suppression of REM did not demonstrate a sta-tistical or clinically meaningful effect in narcolepsy-cataplexy. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05015673.(c) 2023 Published by Elsevier B.V.
Adverse event (AE) data in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) allow quantification of a drug’s safety risk relative to placebo and comparison across medications. The standard US label for Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs typically lists AEs by MedDRA Preferred Term that occur at ≥ 2
Ulotaront, a trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) and serotonin 5-HT1A receptor agonist without antagonist activity at dopamine D2 or the serotonin 5-HT2A receptors, has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of schizophrenia. Here we report the phase 1 translational studies that profiled the effect of ulotaront on brain responses to reward, working memory, and resting state connectivity (RSC) in individuals with low or high schizotypy (LS or HS). Participants were randomized to placebo (n = 32), ulotaront (50 mg; n = 30), or the D2 receptor antagonist amisulpride (400 mg; n = 34) 2 h prior to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) responses to task performance. Ulotaront increased subjective drowsiness, but reaction times were impaired by less than 10% and did not correlate with BOLD responses. In the Monetary Incentive Delay task (reward processing), ulotaront significantly modulated striatal responses to incentive cues, induced medial orbitofrontal responses, and prevented insula activation seen in HS subjects. In the N-Back working memory task, ulotaront modulated BOLD signals in brain regions associated with cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Ulotaront did not show antidepressant-like biases in an emotion processing task. HS had significantly reduced connectivity in default, salience, and executive networks compared to LS participants and both drugs reduced this difference. Although performance impairment may have weakened or contributed to the fMRI findings, the profile of ulotaront on BOLD activations elicited by reward, memory, and resting state is compatible with an indirect modulation of dopaminergic function as indicated by preclinical studies. This phase 1 study supported the subsequent clinical proof of concept trial in people with schizophrenia.Clinical trial registration: Registry# and URL: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01972711, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01972711.
Background: Isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is a potentially injurious parasomnia lacking an established treatment. Ulotaront is a trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist with 5-HT1A receptor agonist activity that has demonstrated efficacy in patients with schizophrenia. In a single dose challenge study in humans, ulotaront 50 mg demonstrated significant REM suppressant effects. We now report post-hoc exploratory analyses designed to evaluate the effect of ulotaront on quantitative REM sleep without atonia (RSWA).Methods: Young healthy adult men (ages 19-35) were randomized to double-blind, cross-over treatment (after 7-day wash-out) with single doses of ulotaront (50 mg or 10 mg) versus placebo followed by polysomnography (PSG) on each of the nights following treatment. Quantitative RSWA was analyzed in a blinded fashion using established visual and automated methods.Results: Subjects received 50 mg (n = 11) or 10 mg (n = 9) of ulotaront. Treatment with ulotaront 50 mg was associated with lower RSWA (p < 0.05), with greatest RSWA reduction (vs. placebo) observed in subjects with RSWA levels above the mean on the baseline night. RSWA levels were similar between treatment with ulotaront 10 mg and placebo.Conclusion: Treatment with ulotaront 50 mg (but not 10 mg) was associated with reductions in RSWA levels in healthy subjects, especially in subjects with higher baseline RSWA levels, providing proof-of concept for ulotaront efficacy in reducing RSWA levels. However, whether ulotaront might have effi-cacy as a treatment for human RBD awaits double-blind trials with ulotaront in clinical RBD populations.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V.
Ulotaront is a trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist in Phase 3 clinical development for the treatment of schizophrenia. Ulotaront was discovered through a unique, target-agnostic approach optimized to identify drug candidates lacking D2 and 5-HT2A receptor antagonism, while demonstrating an antipsychotic-like phenotypic profile in vivo. The mechanism of action (MOA) of ulotaront is thought to be mediated by agonism at TAAR1 and serotonin 5-HT1A receptors. Ulotaront has completed two Phase 2 trials (4-week acute study and 26-week open-label extension) which led to Breakthrough Therapy Designation from the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of schizophrenia. In the double-blind, placebo-controlled, acute study, ulotaront was associated with significant (p < 0.001) improvement in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score (effect size [ES]: 0.45), with improvements vs. placebo also observed across secondary endpoints. Post-hoc analyses of the acute trial revealed additional evidence to support the effect of ulotaront on negative symptoms. In the 4-week study, ulotaront was well-tolerated, with an incidence of adverse events (AEs) numerically lower compared to placebo (45.8% vs. 50.4%; with a number needed to harm [NNH] for individual ulotaront AEs all > 40). The open-label extension demonstrated further improvement across schizophrenia symptoms and confirmed the tolerability of ulotaront, with a 6-month completion rate of 67%. Based on current data, ulotaront shows potential to be a first-in-class TAAR1 agonist for the treatment of schizophrenia with a safety and efficacy profile distinct from current antipsychotics.