BACKGROUND:Arthrofibrosis is a complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and a common cause of aseptic revision TKA (rTKA). Since keloidosis and arthrofibrosis are both fibroproliferative disorders, we hypothesized that a history of keloids may predispose patients to developing arthrofibrosis post-TKA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of prior keloid formation on arthrofibrosis and rTKA incidence within one and two years post-TKA. METHODS:Patients who underwent TKA and had a history of keloids were identified using a national electronic health records database and propensity matched on a 1:1 basis by age, sex, race, ethnicity, Charlson Comorbidity Index, nicotine dependence, obesity, anxiety, and depression status. Exclusion criteria were post-traumatic osteoarthritis, lower-limb neoplasms, prior arthroscopies, osteotomies, or fractures. Primary outcomes were arthrofibrosis and rTKA occurring within one and two years post-TKA. A total of 1,205 patients were identified in each cohort after matching. RESULTS:Patients who had a history of keloids demonstrated a statistically significant increase in risk of arthrofibrosis at both one year (4.7 versus 2.2%; relative risk (RR) 2.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34 to 3.31) and two years (4.7 versus 2.4%; RR 1.97, 95% CI: 1.27 to 3.05) following TKA. Rates of revision TKA did not differ significantly two years after TKA (1.6 versus 1.1%; RR 1.45, 95% CI: 0.73 to 2.96). CONCLUSIONS:In this study utilizing a large national database, history of keloid formation was associated with significantly higher arthrofibrosis rates one and two years post-TKA compared to matched controls. This data is consistent with the sparse literature showing associations between keloidosis and other fibroproliferative disorders with arthrofibrosis. This information may help guide clinicians in their preoperative counseling and postoperative stiffness management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:III.

International medical graduates (IMG) comprise many annual applications submitted for the orthopaedic surgery match but traditionally have a noticeably lower match rate compared with graduates from allopathic and osteopathic medical schools in the United States. Barriers for IMGs include (1) limited US clinical experience, (2) suboptimal networking and sponsorship opportunities, and (3) the extended time and financial investment required to build a strong application. This review article identifies important tips to circumvent these barriers, providing IMGs with a pathway to a successful match into orthopaedic surgery.

Bracing reduces the need for surgical intervention in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, bracing outcomes with variable body mass index (BMI) are understudied. The authors sought to determine the association of BMI with bracing outcomes. The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of 104 patients presenting with AIS. Initial Risser score, hours of bracing per day, BMI percentile, and curve magnitude pre- and postbracing were collected. There was no detectable difference between years of brace wear or primary curve magnitude at time of presentation between both groups. Overall, 29% (25/87) of underweight/normal weight patients and 59% (10/17) of overweight/obese patients had curves ≥ 45 degrees at the end of bracing (p = 0.016). Odds of having a curve ≥ 45 degrees after bracing were 3.5 (95% confidence interval: 1.2 to 10.3, p = 0.021) times higher for overweight/obese patients compared with underweight/normal weight patients. Increased overlying adipose tissue may reduce the corrective forces required to straighten the spine. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(1):029-032, 2024).

INTRODUCTION:The 2022 to 2023 orthopaedic residency cycle implemented a preference signaling program (PSP), allowing applicants to send "signals" to up to 30 programs to demonstrate their genuine interest. With the conclusion of the 2022 to 2023 cycle, the primary purpose of this study was to analyze program director (PD) perceptions of the PSP after the match cycle and provide a retrospective evaluation of the effects of the PSP on the orthopaedic resident selection process. METHODS:A 21-question survey was distributed to 98 PDs (32.7% response rate). Contact information was obtained from a national database. RESULTS:Most respondents (96.9%) participated in the American Orthopaedic Association's PSP. The majority (93.7%) view preference signaling as a positive change. Most PDs (56.2%) reported a decreased number in applications received compared with previous years. Receiving a preference signal was ranked among the most important factors in resident selection, and most PDs agreed that preference signaling should be used to screen applicants (84.4%) and differentiate similar applicants (96.8%). Moreover, 65.6% of PDs indicated that they would not rank or invite applicants to interview without a signal or completion of a formal away rotation. PDs report that in the 2022 to 2023 cycle, 98.5% of applicants who matched at their program had sent a preference signal. DISCUSSION:Preference signaling was one of the most important factors assessed during its inaugural application cycle and is anticipated to remain a key tool for screening and differentiating candidates. Applicants should strategically select signal recipients to enhance their success in the match.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is the largest public funder of biomedical research in the world, with grants totaling 29.5 billion dollars across 2738 organizations in the 2019 fiscal year. With over 27 individual institutes and centers comprising the NIH, a large pool of resources and funding options are available for independent investigators and research organizations. However, for many investigators, identifying available funding options and navigating the grant application process can be a confusing and daunting process. In this chapter, we will review the basics of NIH structure, provide a brief overview of identifying potential funding opportunities, identify key technical steps in the application process, and provide important pearls to follow and pitfalls to avoid during the grant preparation and approval process.

STUDY DESIGN:Systematic Review.OBJECTIVES:To synthesize previous studies evaluating racial disparities in spine surgery.METHODS:We queried PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for literature on racial disparities in spine surgery. Our review was constructed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items and Meta-analyses guidelines and protocol. The main outcome measures were the occurrence of racial disparities in postoperative outcomes, mortality, surgical management, readmissions, and length of stay.RESULTS:A total of 1753 publications were assessed. Twenty-two articles met inclusion criteria. Seventeen studies compared Whites (Ws) and African Americans (AAs) groups; 14 studies reported adverse outcomes for AAs. When compared with Ws, AA patients had higher odds of postoperative complications including mortality, cerebrospinal fluid leak, nervous system complications, bleeding, infection, in-hospital complications, adverse discharge disposition, and delay in diagnosis. Further, AAs were found to have increased odds of readmission and longer length of stay. Finally, AAs were found to have higher odds of nonoperative treatment for spinal cord injury, were more likely to undergo posterior approach in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy, and were less likely to receive cervical disk arthroplasty compared with Ws for similar indications.CONCLUSIONS:This systematic review of spine literature found that when compared with W patients, AA patients had worse health outcomes. Further investigation of root causes of these racial disparities in spine surgery is warranted.

Outcomes of the Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) nail have been reported for femur and tibial fractures, but its use in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) is not well studied. Radiographic and clinical outcomes of TTCA using the SIGN database in patients with > 6 months of radiographic follow up were analyzed. Rates of tibiotalar (TT) fusion and subtalar (ST) fusion at final follow up were assessed by two independent reviewers. Of the 62 patients identified, use of the SIGN nail for TCCA resulted in 53% rate of fusion in the TT joint and 20% in the ST joint. Thirty-seven patients (60%) demonstrated painless weight bearing at final follow up. There were no differences in incidence of painless weight bearing between consensus fused and not fused cohorts for TT and ST joints (p > 0.05). There were five implant failures, no cases of infection, and seven cases of reoperation. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 32(3):187-192, 2023).

Background: Pediatric olecranon fractures can be treated with several methods of fixation. Though postoperative outcomes of various fixation techniques, including cannulated intramedullary screws, have been described in adults, functional and radiographic outcomes of screw fixation in pediatric patients are unclear. In this study, we assessed clinical, radiographic, functional, and patient-reported outcomes of pediatric olecranon fractures treated with compression screw fixation. Methods: We retrospectively identified 37 patients aged 16 years or younger with a total of 40 olecranon fractures treated with screw fixation at our level-1 trauma center between April 2005 and April 2022. From medical records, we extracted data on demographic characteristics, time to radiographic union, range of elbow motion at final follow-up, and complications during the follow-up period. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pediatric Upper Extremity Short Form 8a measures. Results: There were no malunions or nonunions at the final mean follow-up of 140 days (range, 26 to 614 d). Four patients had implant failure (11%), of whom 3 experienced fracture union with no loss of fixation or need for revision surgery. One patient underwent a revision for fracture malreduction. Screw prominence was documented in 1 patient. Instrumentation was removed at our institution for 33 of 40 fractures. Mean time to radiographic union was 53 days (range, 20 to 168 d). Postoperative range of motion at the most recent follow-up visit showed a mean extension deficit of 6 degrees (range, 0–30 degrees) and mean flexion of 134 degrees (range, 60–150 degrees). At the final follow-up, the mean (±SD) Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 4.2±8.0, and the mean Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System score was 37±1.5, indicating good function and patient satisfaction. Conclusions: All 37 patients in our series had excellent radiographic, functional, and patient-reported outcomes after screw fixation. We observed no cases of nonunion or malunion, growth disturbance, or refracture. These results suggest that screw fixation is a safe and effective option for pediatric olecranon fractures. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

Professional societies can provide orthopaedic surgeons opportunities to build strong fellowship among colleagues within a specialty, to gain leadership positions and responsibilities, and to contribute to the latest research and practice management guidelines. However, early-career surgeons often receive little to no guidance about how membership can benefit them in the long term. The primary purpose of this review article was to provide an overview of orthopaedic professional societies, why early-career orthopaedic surgeons should consider membership, and how they can get involved. Topics discussed in this article include the missions of various societies, value in career advancement both in academic and private practice settings, benefits to patient care, and tips for budding surgeons on how to rise up the ranks within a given professional society. We also provide a comprehensive list of leadership development, fellowship, mentorship, and research opportunities that are designed for orthopaedic surgeons within their first 10 years of practice.

Background:Spinal conditions, such as scoliosis and spinal tumors, are prevalent in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Despite the recognized importance of their early detection and treatment, there remain knowledge gaps in how to approach these manifestations. The purpose of this study was to utilize the experience of a multidisciplinary committee of experts to establish consensus-based best practice guidelines (BPGs) for spinal screening and surveillance, surgical intervention, and medical therapy in pediatric patients with NF1.Methods:Using the results of a prior systematic review, 10 key questions that required further assessment were first identified. A committee of 20 experts across medical specialties was then chosen based on their clinical experience with spinal deformity and tumors in NF1. These were 9 orthopaedic surgeons, 4 neuro-oncologists/oncologists, 3 neurosurgeons, 2 neurologists, 1 pulmonologist, and 1 clinical geneticist. An initial online survey on current practices and opinions was conducted, followed by 2 additional surveys via a formal consensus-based modified Delphi method. The final survey involved voting on agreement or disagreement with 35 recommendations. Items reaching consensus (≥70% agreement or disagreement) were included in the final BPGs.Results:Consensus was reached for 30 total recommendations on the management of spinal deformity and tumors in NF1. These were 11 recommendations on screening and surveillance, 16 on surgical intervention, and 3 on medical therapy. Five recommendations did not achieve consensus and were excluded from the BPGs.Conclusion:We present a set of consensus-based BPGs comprised of 30 recommendations for spinal screening and surveillance, surgical intervention, and medical therapy in pediatric NF1.

Study Design: Systematic Review. Objectives: To synthesize previous studies evaluating racial disparities in spine surgery. Methods: We queried PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for literature on racial disparities in spine surgery. Our review was constructed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items and Meta-analyses guidelines and protocol. The main outcome measures were the occurrence of racial disparities in postoperative outcomes, mortality, surgical management, readmissions, and length of stay. Results: A total of 1753 publications were assessed. Twenty-two articles met inclusion criteria. Seventeen studies compared Whites (Ws) and African Americans (AAs) groups; 14 studies reported adverse outcomes for AAs. When compared with Ws, AA patients had higher odds of postoperative complications including mortality, cerebrospinal fluid leak, nervous system complications, bleeding, infection, in-hospital complications, adverse discharge disposition, and delay in diagnosis. Further, AAs were found to have increased odds of readmission and longer length of stay. Finally, AAs were found to have higher odds of nonoperative treatment for spinal cord injury, were more likely to undergo posterior approach in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy, and were less likely to receive cervical disk arthroplasty compared with Ws for similar indications. Conclusions: This systematic review of spine literature found that when compared with W patients, AA patients had worse health outcomes. Further investigation of root causes of these racial disparities in spine surgery is warranted.

INTRODUCTION:Sacral-alar-iliac (SAI) screws are utilized to achieve pelvic fixation in spine deformity patients. The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the long-term outcomes of pediatric patients with scoliosis treated with posterior spinal fusion and SAI fixation at 10-year clinical and radiographic follow-up.METHODS:We reviewed the clinical and radiographic records of patients aged 18 years or below treated for scoliosis with posterior spinal fusion using SAI fixation. Pelvic obliquity and the major coronal curve were determined at the preoperative visit and 6-week, 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year postoperative visits. SAI screw-specific data collected included screw dimensions, rate of screw revision, pain at the SAI screw sites, presence of lucency >2 mm around the screw, screw loosening or breaking, and deep surgical site infections.RESULTS:Ninety-seven of 151 patients (75%) were included. The average age at index surgery was 13.5±3.1 years, and the most common diagnosis was cerebral palsy (67%). The mean duration of follow-up was 11±3 years. The mean pelvic obliquity measured 20±8.0 degrees preoperatively, and 8.7±4.0 degrees at the 10-year follow-up. There were no significant difference in pelvic obliquity when comparing the 10-year follow-up visit with the 6-week postoperative follow-up. Average screw dimensions were 8.4×68.8 mm. By the 10-year follow-up, 4 patients (4%) had at least 1 SAI screw-related complication. Of these patients, 2 (2%) had pain at 1 SAI screw, 4 (4%) had lucency around the screw, and 3 (3%) had broken or loose screws. Two (2%) required SAI screw revision because of late deep wound infection, and underwent exchange with a longer screw. There were no intrapelvic protrusions, vascular, or neurological complications.CONCLUSIONS:SAI screws are a safe and effective method for pelvic fixation in children with spinal deformity. The outcomes at ≥10 years are satisfactory, with low rates of long-term complications and excellent postoperative correction and subsequent maintenance of coronal curvature and pelvic obliquity over time.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Level IV.

The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize evidence regarding spinal screening recommendations, types of spinal and thoracic neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) tumors, medical therapy for NF1-associated neoplasms, and treatment with magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) or cervical kyphosis correction in pediatric patients with NF1. We queried PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, and medRxiv for studies reporting spinal screening recommendations, prognosis, and medical therapy for NF1-associated spinal tumors and MCGR use or cervical kyphosis correction in pediatric NF1 patients, yielding 758 publications, 33 of which were included. There is no consensus on spinal screening interval. Computed tomography is recommended for postoperative monitoring. Patients with gangliomas and spinal neurofibromas had nearly complete symptom resolution after resection. Plexiform neurofibromas were most commonly treated with resection and laminectomy; some patients reported tumor enlargement after intervention. Malignant nerve sheath tumors have high rates of metastasis even after chemoradiation and resection. MEK-inhibitors produced limited regression in tumor size. Sirolimus and thalidomide reduced tumor size but caused more severe adverse effects than MEK-inhibitors. Improvements in major curves and T1-T12 height gain were reported after MCGR intervention. Anteroposterior arthrodesis produced the greatest correction of dystrophic cervical kyphosis. There may be value in establishing standardized spinal screening protocols for pediatric NF1 patients. Surgical correction of NF1-associated spinal deformity is effective, though current medical therapies for spinal tumors have limited success. Areas for further investigation include determining appropriate screening intervals, choice of medical therapy for spinal tumors, and long-term outcomes of MCGRs. Level of Evidence: IV.

Background: Displaced pediatric tibial tubercle fractures are commonly stabilized with screws directed posteriorly toward neurovascular structures. Here, we (1) characterize the variation of the popliteal artery among pediatric patients; and (2) recommend a safe screw trajectory for fixation of tibial tubercle fractures. Methods: We retrospectively identified 42 patients (42 knees; 29 female) aged 12–17 years with lower-extremity magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at a tertiary academic center. The mean patient age was 14.5 (range: 12–17) years, and the mean body mass index value was 19.1 (range: 14.9–25.1). We included patients with open physes or visible physeal scars and excluded those with prior instrumentation or lower-extremity injury. Using sagittal MRI, we measured the distances from 5 levels each on the anterior and posterior tibial cortex to the popliteal artery (level 1, midpoint of proximal tibial epiphysis; level 2, the proximal extent of the tubercle; level 3, tubercle prominence; level 4, 2 cm distal to the proximal extent of the tubercle; level 5, 4 cm distal to the proximal extent of the tubercle). Using coronal MRI, we measured the width of the tibia at each level and the distance from the lateral-most and medial-most cortex to the artery. Results: The popliteal artery was laterally positioned in all knees. The mean distance between the artery and lateral-most aspect of the tibia at each level ranged from 1.9 to 2.4 cm, and from 2.3 to 3.9 cm from the medial-most aspect of the tibia. The mean distance that a screw can advance before vascular injury was 5.1 cm at level 1. The shortest mean distance to the popliteal artery was 1.7 cm, at level 5. There is minimal distance between the posterior tibial cortex and the artery at all levels. Conclusions: Understanding the position of the popliteal artery in pediatric patients can help when stabilizing tibial tubercle fractures. Because the artery is close to the posterior cortex, a drill exiting in line with the popliteal artery risks vascular injury. Therefore, we recommend that screws exit within the medial 60% of the tibia. Level of Evidence: IV

Study Design: This was a retrospective study. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the technical challenges and outcomes of sacral-alar-iliac (SAI) fixation for scoliosis in patients who had previously undergone a pelvic osteotomy for hip dysplasia. Summary of Background Data: Patients with neuromuscular disease are at high risk for developing hip dislocation and scoliosis. Surgical correction of one may affect the other. Methods: We reviewed the records of patients aged 18 years and below who underwent spinal fusion using SAI screws after having undergone a pelvic osteotomy, with ≥2-year follow-up. We recorded the SAI screw dimensions, time from osteotomy to SAI fixation, type of osteotomy, and any complications performing SAI fixation due to the pelvic osteotomy. Bivariate statistics were used to analyze the data with statistical significance defined as P-value <0.05. Results: Thirty-two patients were included. The average age was 10.3±3.2 years at pelvic osteotomy and 13.5±3.4 years at SAI fixation. Most patients had cerebral palsy (87.5%) and a unilateral Dega osteotomy (78.1%). Average screw dimensions were significantly shorter on the side of the osteotomy (66 vs. 72 mm, P<0.05). SAI screw placement was technically challenging in 8 patients (25%), due to pelvic distortion from the pelvic osteotomy. The use of a curved awl helped to find the intracortical channel. No patients had complications due to the SAI screw, and there were no significant differences in pelvic obliquity and major coronal curve correction. Two patients (6.3%) had screw lucency >2 mm around the SAI screw on the side of the pelvic osteotomy but no clinical symptoms. Conclusions: SAI fixation in patients with previous pelvic osteotomy is technically challenging due to pelvic morphology and prior implants. Often, a shorter SAI screw is required on the side of the osteotomy. However, outcomes in this patient population are satisfactory, with no significant complications at a 2-year follow-up. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

BackgroundAcute flaccid myelitis (AFM) is an anterior horn disorder that manifests as rapid onset muscle weakness or paralysis. Development of scoliosis in pediatric AFM patients has been anecdotally reported, but associated risk factors or incidence have yet to be determined.MethodsPediatric AFM patients treated over a 10-year period at a tertiary care center were identified. Patients were considered to have scoliosis if there was radiographic evidence of coronal curvature ≥15 degrees. Number of limbs affected, independent ambulation and head control, ventilator requirement at initial admission, and long-term ventilatory support (≥1 year) were recorded. Muscle strength and functional status were assessed by manual muscle testing (MMT) and Physical Abilities and Mobility Scale (PAMS), respectively. Areas of spinal cord lesion on initial MRI were recorded. Bivariate analyses were performed, with alpha set to 0.05.ResultsFifty-six AFM patients (27 scoliosis, 29 no scoliosis) were identified. Mean time from AFM presentation to scoliosis diagnosis was 0.93 years. Mean major Cobb angle at first radiograph was 31.7 ± 14.3 degrees. Lack of independent ambulation, ventilator dependence at time of admission or long term, number of limbs affected, and decreased MMT and PAMS scores were more common in patients who developed scoliosis (all, p < .05). Patients who developed scoliosis had more extensive thoracic spinal cord involvement on initial MRI (p = .03).ConclusionAFM patients who develop scoliosis are more likely to be ventilator dependent, lack independent ambulation, and have more extensive thoracic SCI.

Introduction:On March 30, 2022, the American Orthopaedic Association's Council of Orthopaedic Residency Directors announced its endorsement for a preference signaling program (PSP) for the 2022 to 2023 orthopaedic residency application cycle. The purpose of our study was to assess orthopaedic surgery residency program director (PD) perceptions of the PSP and analyze potential effects of the PSP on the residency application process.Methods:A 19-question survey was distributed to 98 PDs (40.8% response rate). Contact information was obtained from a national database.Results:Most programs plan to participate in the PSP (87.5%). Preference signaling is highly regarded for residency selection, with PDs ranking its relative importance just below away rotation performance and personal knowledge of the applicant. Most PDs agreed that applicants will have increased chances of receiving interviews at programs they send a preference signal (65%). Most PDs also do not think that the PSP will help improve diversity (42.5%) and combat the overapplication phenomenon (67.5%). A majority think that an application cap limiting the total number of applications submitted should be initiated in future application cycles (85%).Conclusion:Preference signaling will be one of the most important factors considered during orthopaedic residency selection. A signal will likely improve applicants' chance of receiving an interview. Thus, students should be selective about where they send their preference signals and invest time in creating strong, personal connections with a few, select programs to increase their success in the orthopaedic residency match.

Purpose The purpose is to compare the rate of recurrent deep wound infection in patients who retained MCGRs versus those who underwent implant removal and exchange following index deep wound infection. Methods Using a multicenter registry, we identified patients with EOS who underwent surgical correction with MCGR. We defined deep SSI as any infection that required subsequent I&D and antibiotic therapy. Recurrent infection was defined as any additional deep SSI following treatment of index deep infection. We considered MCGR to be salvaged if implant exchange or removal was not performed for at least 1 year following date of infection. Bivariate statistical analyses were performed. Results 992 EOS patients were identified, of whom 33 (3.3%) developed deep SSI. The mean time between initial surgery and first deep SSI was 13.1 months (Interquartile range [IQR]: 1 to 25 months. Infection rates by EOS diagnosis were as follows: 13/354 patients (3.6%) had neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS), 9/225 (4.0%) syndromic, 6/248 (2.4%) idiopathic, 3/135 congenital (2.2%), and 2/30 (6.6%) unknown etiology. MCGR was salvaged in 69% of NMS patients, 77% of syndromic patients, 100% of congenital patients, and 83% of idiopathic patients (83%). There were only four recurrent infections (2/13 NMS, 2/9 syndromic) and no differences in rates of recurrent infection between salvaged or replaced/exchanged MCGR. ( p = 0.97). Conclusion Deep wound infection occurred in 3% of MCGR patients at a mean of 13.1 months. There were no significant differences in rates of recurrent infection between salvaged implants and those removed or exchanged.

The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize evidence regarding spinal screening recommendations, types of spinal and thoracic neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) tumors, medical therapy for NF1-associated neoplasms, and treatment with magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) or cervical kyphosis correction in pediatric patients with NF1. We queried PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, and medRxiv for studies reporting spinal screening recommendations, prognosis, and medical therapy for NF1-associated spinal tumors and MCGR use or cervical kyphosis correction in pediatric NF1 patients, yielding 758 publications, 33 of which were included. There is no consensus on spinal screening interval. Computed tomography is recommended for postoperative monitoring. Patients with gangliomas and spinal neurofibromas had nearly complete symptom resolution after resection. Plexiform neurofibromas were most commonly treated with resection and laminectomy; some patients reported tumor enlargement after intervention. Malignant nerve sheath tumors have high rates of metastasis even after chemoradiation and resection. MEK-inhibitors produced limited regression in tumor size. Sirolimus and thalidomide reduced tumor size but caused more severe adverse effects than MEK-inhibitors. Improvements in major curves and T1–T12 height gain were reported after MCGR intervention. Anteroposterior arthrodesis produced the greatest correction of dystrophic cervical kyphosis. There may be value in establishing standardized spinal screening protocols for pediatric NF1 patients. Surgical correction of NF1-associated spinal deformity is effective, though current medical therapies for spinal tumors have limited success. Areas for further investigation include determining appropriate screening intervals, choice of medical therapy for spinal tumors, and long-term outcomes of MCGRs. Level of Evidence: IV.