Purpose: We examined the effect of selenium vs placebo on remission rate and quality of life (QoL) in the Graves’ selenium supplementation (GRASS) trial (ID: NCT01611896). Methods: Double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multi-centre trial in individuals with newly diagnosed Graves’ hyperthyroidism randomised to daily supplementation with 200 μg selenium or placebo tablets during 24–30 months, depending on the timing of antithyroid drug (ATD) withdrawal. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with non-remission, defined as receiving ATD or remaining hyperthyroid (thyroid stimulating hormone <0.1 mIU/L) during the last 12 months of the intervention period or referral to ablative therapy (radioactive iodine or surgery). QoL was serially assessed by the thyroid-related patient-reported outcome ThyPRO and compared with previously collected norm data. Results: Between Dec 7th 2012 and Dec 3rd 2018, 430 participants with Graves’ hyperthyroidism were recruited. Non-remission was observed in 114 (53.3%) participants in the placebo group and 118 (54.6%) in the selenium group (OR = 1.0 (95% CI: 0.7–1.5); P = 0.98). There was no beneficial effect of selenium, as compared with placebo, on any ThyPRO scale. The participants’ QoL at the end of the study was comparable to that of the general population sample. Thyrotropin receptor antibody levels were similar in the groups at the 18-month and end-of-study follow-up visits. Conclusion: In individuals with newly diagnosed Graves’ hyperthyroidism, daily supplementation with selenium did not have any effects compared with placebo as add-on to standard antithyroid drugs. The GRASS trial findings do not support the use of selenium supplementation in Graves’ hyperthyroidism.

Background:Recent surveys have highlighted substantial variability in the management of hypothyroidism that is associated with physician demographic and geo-economic characteristics. This study aimed to assess preferences for thyroid hormone therapy among medical thyroid specialists in Korea. Methods:An online survey was conducted using the Treatment of Hypothyroidism in Europe by Specialists: An International Survey (THESIS) questionnaire. Participants were medical thyroid specialists who were members of the Korean Thyroid Association (KTA). Results:Among the 349 regular members of the KTA who were physicians, 53 (15.2%) completed the survey. All respondents reported prescribing levothyroxine (LT4) as the initial treatment of choice for hypothyroidism. For patients with biochemical euthyroidism, 64.2% of respondents indicated that treatment was unnecessary; however, several conditions were cited as potential indications for thyroid hormone use (multiple responses were allowed), including female infertility with elevated thyroid antibody levels (30.2%), enlarging simple goiter (17.0%), and severe hypercholesterolemia as adjunctive therapy (9.4%). Although 24.5% of respondents reported avoiding LT4+liothyronine (LT3) therapy because of low-quality evidence, 62.3% indicated that they would consider it for symptomatic patients receiving LT4 monotherapy with normal thyroid-stimulating hormone levels. Conclusion:Korean thyroid specialists generally adhere to current clinical guidelines, favoring LT4 as the standard treatment for hypothyroidism. However, there is considerable willingness to use LT4+LT3 combination therapy and to prescribe thyroid hormones for certain non-thyroid conditions. Ongoing educational efforts are needed to improve understanding that many persistent symptoms despite biochemical euthyroidism are influenced by psychosocial factors and to facilitate consistent implementation of evidencebased, guideline-aligned clinical practice.

Objective: Several thyroid hormone formulations are available for treatment of hypothyroidism. This study aimed at evaluating the use of these treatment options by Israeli endocrinologists in various clinical scenarios. Methods: Israeli Endocrine Society members were invited to participate in a web-based questionnaire, Treatment of Hypothyroidism in Europe by Specialists: An International Survey. Results: 99.2% of respondents used LT4 tablets as first line therapy for hypothyroidism. Thyroid hormone replacement options considered by respondents included LT4 tablets (100%), soft-gel capsules (4.0%), liquid solution (15.4%), combined LT4 + LT3 (2.4%) and LT3 tablets (17.8%). In cases of impaired absorption or persistent symptoms, most would continue LT4 tablets (86.1% and 95.1%, respectively), of whom 39.0% noted that only tablets are available in Israel. In patients with normal serum TSH and persistent symptoms, 95.1% would continue LT4 tablets, 57.5% would consider the addition of LT3 whereas 24.4% stated that LT4/LT3 combination should never be used. In euthyroid patients, LT4 therapy was considered in infertile women with high levels of thyroid antibodies (33.6%) and for simple goiter growing over time (11.4%). Conclusions: In Israel, LT4 tablets are the treatment of choice for hypothyroidism in most clinical scenarios, including in patients with impaired absorption or with persistent symptoms, for whom a combination therapy with LT4 + LT3 is considered by half of respondents. Other LT4 formulations are not widely available in Israel, thus are infrequently considered compared to other European countries. These data suggest that international guidelines regarding the use of various thyroid hormone formulations in specific clinical scenarios are warranted.

Levothyroxine (LT4) is the established treatment for hypothyroidism but some controversies, such as whether combining it with liothyronine (LT3) for hypothyroid patients and whether prescribing it to euthyroid patients, exist on its use. This survey was conducted to investigate current trends about thyroid hormone use in hypothyroid and euthyroid patients in Japan. Members of the Japan Thyroid Association (JTA) were invited to participate in an online questionnaire based on the THESIS (Treatment of Hypothyroidism in Europe by Specialists: An International Survey) survey. Anonymous responses from 207 of 874 (23.7%) JTA-certified thyroid specialists were analyzed. LT4 was the first line treatment for hypothyroidism by all respondents. 18.8% and 28.0% would also use LT3 and LT3 + LT4 combination, respectively. LT3 + LT4 combination was preferred for patients on LT4 with residual symptoms or low serum T3 levels. Psychological factors and comorbidities were considered as the main contributors to residual symptoms. Respondents would prescribe thyroid hormones in euthyroid subjects for female infertility with positive anti-thyroid antibodies (46.9%), for Hashimoto's disease with a huge goiter (29.0%), and for pregnant or infertile women with TSH between 2.5-4 mU/L irrespective of anti-thyroid antibody status (43.0 and 76.8%, and 46.9 and 77.3%, respectively). In conclusion, Japanese thyroid specialists chose LT4 as first line treatment for hypothyroidism in accordance with current guidelines. The use of LT3 + LT4 combination is less frequent in Japan than in other countries, whereas the use of thyroid hormones for non-hypothyroid indications is similarly high worldwide, which is not necessarily in accord with pertinent society guidelines.

OBJECTIVE:The practice of treating hypothyroid and euthyroid patients with thyroid hormones varies between countries, as observed in the recent surveys of European thyroid experts, THESIS. As part of the THESIS initiative, we investigated Canadian endocrinologists' perspectives on this topic, focusing on combination therapy with either liothyronine (LT3) plus levothyroxine (LT4) or desiccated thyroid extract (DTE). DESIGN:Members of the Canadian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (CSEM) were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey. RESULTS:Out of 348 eligible CSEM members, 68 (19.5%) respondents were included in the analysis. All respondents used LT4 as the first-line treatment for hypothyroid patients. Many respondents (64.7%) would consider LT4 + LT3 for patients on LT4 with persistent symptoms, whereas fewer would consider DTE (16.2%). Most respondents attributed persistent symptoms in LT4-treated patients to psychosocial factors, comorbidities, or unrealistic expectations. Approximately half of the respondents stated that thyroid hormone therapy is never indicated for euthyroid patients. The remaining respondents considered thyroid hormones for euthyroid women with infertility and high thyroid antibody levels (36.8%), depression (13.2%), and growing goiter (7.4%). CONCLUSIONS:Following current guidelines, LT4 tablet is the preferred treatment for hypothyroidism. Most respondents would consider triiodothyronine-containing therapy for patients with persistent symptoms, preferring LT4 + LT3 over DTE. The number of endocrinologists considering combination therapy for hypothyroid patients in Canada was higher than in Europe. Finally, at variance with current guidelines, a fraction of the respondents would consider thyroid hormones in patients with non-thyroidal conditions.

BackgroundManaging patients with fatigue is a clinical challenge. Because fatigue is often reported in hypothyroidism, thyroid hormone (TH) therapy may sometimes be incorrectly considered for biochemically euthyroid individuals. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and determinants of this practice in different European countries.MethodsWe analyzed aggregate data from the THESIS (Treatment of Hypothyroidism in Europe by Specialists: an International Survey) online survey. We analyzed responses from 5,695 members of 28 national endocrine/thyroid societies’ specialists to the statement: “Thyroid hormones may be indicated in biochemically euthyroid patients with unexplained fatigue”.ResultsOverall, 7.5% (426/5695) of respondents indicated that TH therapy might be considered for euthyroid patients with unexplained fatigue. The proportion of positive responses varied widely across different countries (between 1.1% in Switzerland and 29.3% in Serbia; p=2 ×10-16) and regions (between 4.7% in Western Europe and 8.7% in Western Asia or 8.8% in Eastern Europe; p=0.004). TH were more frequently prescribed for unexplained fatigue by male respondents (Odds Ratio, OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.18-1.78) and physicians practicing in private practice (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.02-1.58), and less frequently by endocrinologists (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.83).ConclusionA small, yet not negligible percentage of European thyroid-focused physicians consider using TH for euthyroid patients with unexplained fatigue, with significant variations based on geographic, demographic, and practice-related factors. Using levothyroxine and/or liothyronine in such cases lacks evidence and may partially contribute to the concerning overuse of TH therapy.

AIMS:To investigate the putative association between semaglutide and non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION). MATERIALS AND METHODS:Data from national health registries in Denmark (2018-2024) and Norway (2018-2022) were used to compare NAION risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes initiating semaglutide versus sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is). A supplementary self-controlled analysis examined NAION risk among all semaglutide users. National estimates were pooled using a fixed-effects model. RESULTS:We identified 44 517 users of semaglutide for the management of type 2 diabetes in Denmark and 16 860 in Norway, with a total of 32 NAION events observed. The unadjusted incidence rate of NAION was 2.19/10 000 person-years among Danish semaglutide initiators, compared to 1.18 among SGLT-2i initiators. In Norway, the corresponding rates were 2.90 and 0.92, respectively. After adjustment, the pooled hazard ratio (HR) was 2.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.67-4.75), and the incidence rate difference (IRD) was +1.41 (95% CI +0.53 to +2.29) per 10 000 person-years. Estimates were consistent across both countries but higher and less precise in Norway (HR 7.25; 95% CI 2.34-22.4) compared to Denmark (HR 2.17; 95% CI 1.20-3.92). Results remained consistent across sensitivity and supplementary analyses, with a stronger association observed in a post hoc per-protocol analysis (HR 6.35; 95% CI 2.88-14.0). In the supplementary self-controlled study, symmetry ratios (SRs) for NAION were 1.14 (95% CI 0.55-2.36) in Denmark and 2.67 (95% CI 0.91-8.99) in Norway. CONCLUSIONS:The use of semaglutide for managing type 2 diabetes is associated with an increased risk of NAION compared with the use of SGLT-2is. However, the absolute risk remains low.

Introduction: Concerns have been raised that glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) may increase the risk of thyroid cancer, but evidence remains conflicting. We therefore investigated if GLP1-RA use, compared with use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is), was associated with thyroid cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes.Methods: This multisite cohort study with subsequent meta-analysis included six population-based databases from Canada (Ontario), Denmark, Norway, South Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan. Study populations comprised patients with type 2 diabetes between 2007 and 2023. Cox regression models estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for thyroid cancer among GLP1-RA users compared with DPP-4is. Models were weighted using standardized mortality ratio weights generated from time-specific propensity scores. Site-specific HRs were pooled using a fixed-effects model.Results: We identified 98,147 users of GLP1-RA and 2,488,303 users of DPP-4i, with the median follow-up among users of GLP1-RA ranging from 1.8 to 3.0 years. Overall, use of GLP1-RA relative to use of DPP-4i was not associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer (pooled weighted HR 0.81, CI 0.59-1.12). Similarly, we observed no increased risk in thyroid cancer with increasing cumulative dose of GLP1-RA among GLP1-RA ever-users. Subgroup analysis of types of thyroid cancer was not possible. Results remained consistent across a range of supplementary analyses.Discussion: In this large multisite study, utilizing data from six population-based databases, we found no evidence that GLP1-RA use is associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer with follow-up ranging from 1.8 to 3.0 years, providing some reassurance to patients and clinicians about the short-term safety of these drugs. Nevertheless, evidence was insufficient to rule out excess risk with long-term use, due to the short follow-up.

Thyroid hormone (TH) prescribing practices, particularly on hypothyroid and euthyroid patients, were compared between Japan Thyroid Association (JTA)-certified thyroid specialists and non-certified members. A nationwide questionnaire survey (Treatment of Hypothyroidism in Europe by Specialists: An International Survey) was conducted among all 2,938 JTA members, including 874 certified specialists and 2,064 non-certified members, to assess self-reported TH prescription choices in various clinical scenarios. Responses from certified specialists and non-certified members were statistically compared. A total of 207 certified specialists (23.7%) and 129 non-certified members (6.3%) responded and completed the questionnaire. Although all certified specialists and non-certified members selected levothyroxine (LT4) as first-line therapy for hypothyroidism, certified specialists more often used liothyronine (LT3) plus LT4 combination therapy than non-certified members (28% vs. 12%, p < 0.001), particularly for LT4-treated patients with persistent hypothyroid-like symptoms (9% vs. 2%, p = 0.02). For euthyroid individuals, 71% of certified specialists and 60% of non-certified members considered TH treatment (p = 0.043). Non-certified members who see >100 hypothyroid patients per year were more inclined to use combination therapy for hypothyroid patients and TH for euthyroid patients than those of ≤100 patients (p < 0.049 and 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, JTA-certified thyroid specialists and non-certified members exhibit distinct TH prescribing patterns. Certified specialists are more open to combination therapy and treating selected euthyroid patients, whereas non-certified members favor guideline-based LT4 monotherapy. These differences underscore the impact of specialization on clinical practice and suggest a need for updated guidelines and targeted education to rationalize thyroid care.

PurposeTreatment-resistant depression (TRD) is most commonly defined as depression that has not responded to two different pharmacological agents used for an adequate period of time. We explored the views of European specialists via survey, regarding the use of thyroid hormone (TH) in euthyroid patients with TRD as part of ‘Treatment of Hypothyroidism in Europe by Specialists: An International Survey’ (THESIS).MethodsThe question “Thyroid hormones may be indicated in biochemically euthyroid patients with treatment resistant depression” was posed to specialists from 28 countries.Results5695 valid responses were received following 17,232 invitations (33.0% response rate; 65% female, 90% endocrinologists). 348 (6.1%) stated that TH may be indicated in biochemically euthyroid patients with TRD. This view was more common in males (p<0.01), respondents who saw ≥100 patients with hypothyroidism per year (p<0.01), respondents who worked in private practice (p=0.05) and respondents who were not members of international specialist associations (p=0.05). Geographical variation existed with respondents in Eastern Europe significantly more likely to use TH in TRD (p<0.01). Linear regression showed a statistically significant reduction in the use of TH for TRD with increasing gross national income (F-statistic=7.35, CI -0.15 - -0.02, p=0.01). TH in TRD was recommended in psychiatry guidelines but not endocrinology guidelines.ConclusionWhile there is limited evidence for their use, over 6% of respondents stated that TH may be indicated in TRD. Due to the risk of iatrogenic thyrotoxicosis and increased morbidity the use of TH should be addressed in relevant endocrinology guidelines and consensus should be reached between specialties.

IntroductionOver-diagnosis and over-treatment of hypothyroidism is a growing concern. The role of patient knowledge has not been previously investigated. The aim was to explore patient knowledge in relation to diagnosis and treatment of hypothyroidism.MethodsCross-sectional, international online survey. Participants were people with treated hypothyroidism amounting to 3421 valid respondents from 68 countries. A questionnaire was used, which included knowledge statements about hypothyroidism relating to recommendations by international guidelines. The principal knowledge statement was “A patient with a normal thyroid blood test does not need to be treated with thyroid hormones (even if they have positive thyroid antibodies and symptoms)”, and participants were asked to classify it as “false”, “true”, or “don’t know”. Responses were divided into corresponding groups: “Incorrect”, “Correct”, and “Unsure”. Associations of groups with respondent characteristics and patient reported outcomes were investigated. Responses to a further seven knowledge statements explored ampliative knowledge about hypothyroidism.ResultsWith regards to the principal knowledge statement, “Correct”, “Incorrect” and “Unsure” comprised 15.3%, 50.7% and 34.0% of responses to the respectively. “Incorrect” respondents were more likely than expected to live in the United Kingdom, have Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, have a recent low self-reported serum thyrotropin, be treated with liothyronine-containing medication, and use social media and the internet for hypothyroidism-related information daily. “Incorrect” responses were associated with dissatisfaction, poor perceived control of symptoms and negative impact of hypothyroidism on everyday activities. The proportion of “Incorrect” responses for seven other knowledge statements ranged between 1.8-34.9%.DiscussionIncorrect responses to the principal knowledge statement were common in this sample of people with hypothyroidism, and associated with several demographic variables and adverse patient outcomes. Our findings suggest that knowledge gaps about the significance of symptoms in relation to the diagnosis and treatment of hypothyroidism may be important in driving over-diagnosis and over-treatment. The high number of “Unsure” respondents suggests that patient education may be an effective intervention.

OBJECTIVE:Several thyroid hormone formulations are available for treatment of hypothyroidism. This study aimed at evaluating the use of these treatment options by Israeli endocrinologists in various clinical scenarios. METHODS:Israeli Endocrine Society members were invited to participate in a web-based questionnaire, Treatment of Hypothyroidism in Europe by Specialists: An International Survey. RESULTS:99.2% of respondents used LT4 tablets as first line therapy for hypothyroidism. Thyroid hormone replacement options considered by respondents included LT4 tablets (100%), soft-gel capsules (4.0%), liquid solution (15.4%), combined LT4 + LT3 (2.4%) and LT3 tablets (17.8%). In cases of impaired absorption or persistent symptoms, most would continue LT4 tablets (86.1% and 95.1%, respectively), of whom 39.0% noted that only tablets are available in Israel. In patients with normal serum TSH and persistent symptoms, 95.1% would continue LT4 tablets, 57.5% would consider the addition of LT3 whereas 24.4% stated that LT4/LT3 combination should never be used. In euthyroid patients, LT4 therapy was considered in infertile women with high levels of thyroid antibodies (33.6%) and for simple goiter growing over time (11.4%). CONCLUSIONS:In Israel, LT4 tablets are the treatment of choice for hypothyroidism in most clinical scenarios, including in patients with impaired absorption or with persistent symptoms, for whom a combination therapy with LT4 + LT3 is considered by half of respondents. Other LT4 formulations are not widely available in Israel, thus are infrequently considered compared to other European countries. These data suggest that international guidelines regarding the use of various thyroid hormone formulations in specific clinical scenarios are warranted.

ObjectiveUltrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is essential for evaluating thyroid nodules but often yields inadequate samples, leading to repeated procedures, increased discomfort, and higher costs. Previous non-randomized studies found promising results of spinal needles to improve diagnostic adequacy. Therefore, we conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial to validate these findings.MethodsBetween July 1st, 2021, and April 13th, 2023, patients with suspicious thyroid nodules were randomized to receive FNAB with either a 25G spinal needle or conventional needle. The primary outcome was the rate of adequate diagnostic cytology. Secondary outcomes included procedure-related pain, sensitivity and specificity of FNAB, and adverse events.ResultsA total of 359 patients (75.6% female), with a mean age of 59.7 years (range 23-94) were randomized. The rate of adequate diagnostic FNAB was 86.2% (156/181) for the spinal group compared to 84.8% (151/178) for the control group (OR 1.01; 95% CI: 0.95-1.08). The mean pain scale score was 4.0 (SD = 1.8) in the spinal group and 3.9 (SD = 2.0) in the control group (p = 0.40). No complications were observed in either group. We found a significantly better cytological adequacy rate of FNABs performed by physicians with more than four years of experience in the procedure (OR=1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.14).ConclusionsNo significant improvement was found using spinal needles with a stylet compared to conventional needles. Given the significantly higher cost of spinal needles and comparable diagnostic outcomes, their routine use for thyroid FNAB is not recommended.

Background/Objective:The management of hypothyroidism has evolved over time as the development of new guidelines and formulations of thyroid hormone have become available. Methods:A survey of American Association of Clinical Endocrinology members in the United States examining the treatment of hypothyroidism, including questions about initial choice of therapy, use of liothyronine (LT3)-containing regimens, and use of thyroid hormones in hypothyroid and non-hypothyroid patients. Results:Survey links were opened by 387 of 4000 potential respondents and completed by 299 (7%). Respondents unanimously cited levothyroxine (LT4) as the initial treatment choice for hypothyroidism. Forty-seven percent indicated they would use thyroid hormones in patients with euthyroidism with infertility and elevated thyroid antibodies, with smaller numbers for goiter, depression, hypercholesterolemia, fatigue, and obesity. About 60% would consider combination LT4/LT3 in a patient with euthyroidism who does not feel well on treatment or has persistent symptoms. In contrast, a much smaller minority (16% for LT4/LT3 and 5% for desiccated thyroid extract) used such regimens to manage their own hypothyroidism. Persistent symptoms in treated patients with a normal TSH were most often attributed to psychosocial factors, unrealistic patient expectations, and comorbidities. Significant associations were identified between respondent demographics and treatment choices, most notably age, practice setting, and volume of patients with hypothyroidism. Conclusions:LT4 monotherapy is overwhelmingly employed as first line therapy for hypothyroidism by U.S. clinicians. However, the high usage of thyroid hormones for patients whose symptoms were considered to be unrelated to hypothyroidism is at odds with current international guidelines for the management of hypothyroidism.

AIMS:Published literature has raised concerns regarding a causal association between glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) use and thyroid cancer risk in adults. In this analysis, we evaluated the association between thyroid cancer risk and GLP-1RA use. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Our evaluation included data from (i) 93 liraglutide or semaglutide phase 2 and 3 clinical trials, of which six were cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs); (ii) post-marketing surveillance from the Novo Nordisk safety database (evaluating data for liraglutide and semaglutide); and (iii) the US Merative™ MarketScan® Commercial Database. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated for overall thyroid cancer risk for treatment groups in the clinical trials and for individuals with type 2 diabetes treated with any GLP-1RAs versus sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) for the real-world data. RESULTS:Data from all clinical trials across 101 732 participants (totalling 206 950 patient-years of exposure [PYE]) reported low numbers of thyroid cancer events; across all trials, HRs were 1.70 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99, 3.03) and 1.83 (0.70, 6.71) for pooled GLP-1RA versus pooled placebo and active comparator, respectively. For CVOTs, the HR (95% CI) for pooled GLP-1RA versus pooled placebo was 1.41 (0.72, 2.81). Post-marketing surveillance data showed a low thyroid cancer reporting rate of 0.001 cases/100 PYE and did not support an association between liraglutide or semaglutide exposure and the number of thyroid cancer events. Analysis of the US Merative™ MarketScan® Commercial Database reported an HR of 0.87 (95% CI 0.58, 1.29) for the occurrence of thyroid cancer in individuals using any GLP-1RAs versus SGLT2is. CONCLUSIONS:The totality of data analysed did not suggest an association between liraglutide or semaglutide use and thyroid cancer risk in adults.

OBJECTIVE:A relationship among hypothyroidism and lipid disorders is well established. However, current evidence and guidelines do not support the use of thyroid hormones (TH) in euthyroid patients with hyperlipidaemia as potential harms are considerable. This European survey investigated the use of TH in euthyroid patients with severe hypercholesterolemia as a complementary treatment. DESIGN:Data were derived from the THESIS (Treatment of Hypothyroidism in Europe by Specialists) project that surveyed TH use. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to explore associations. RESULTS:Out of 17,232 invitations, 5695 (33.0%) valid responses were received, and of these, 328 (5.8%) stated that TH are indicated in euthyroid patients with severe hypercholesterolemia. Univariable analyses disclosed significant differences and associations: (a) more non-endocrinologists (8.9%) than endocrinologist (5.4%) used TH (p < 0.001), (b) the number of hypothyroid patients treated per year was inversely related to use of TH (p = 0.024), (c) members of international endocrine/thyroid societies were more likely to use TH than non-members (p < 0.001), (d) significant variations by country and geographical region (p < 0.001), and (e) inverse relationship between gross national income per capita (GNIPC) and TH use (p < 0.001). Multivariable analyses yielded significant associations between use of TH, and male gender, specialty and GNIPC (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:This study suggests that a small but noteworthy minority of European thyroid specialists may be using TH to treat of severe hypercholesterolemia in euthyroid patients. If confirmed, this finding highlights the importance of raising awareness among thyroid specialists, professional societies, and healthcare providers to ensure adherence to evidence-based practices.

PURPOSE:We investigated whether selenium supplementation improves quality-of-life (QoL) in patients with autoimmune thyroiditis (ID:NCT02013479). METHODS:We included 412 patients ≥18 years with serum thyroid peroxidase antibody (TPOAb) level ≥100 IU/mL in a multicentre double-blinded randomised clinical trial. The patients were allocated 1:1 to daily supplementation with either 200 μg selenium as selenium-enriched yeast or matching placebo tablets for 12 months, as add-on to levothyroxine (LT4) treatment. QoL, assessed by the Thyroid-related Patient-Reported-Outcome questionnaire (ThyPRO-39), was measured at baseline, after six weeks, three, six, 12, and 18 months. RESULTS:In total, 332 patients (81%) completed the intervention period, of whom 82% were women. Although QoL improved during the trial, no difference in any of the ThyPRO-39 scales was found between the selenium group and the placebo group after 12 months of intervention. In addition, employing linear mixed model regression no difference between the two groups was observed in the ThyPRO-39 composite score (28.8 [95%CI:24.5-33.6] and 28.0 [24.5-33.1], respectively; P=0.602). Stratifying the patients according to duration of the disease at inclusion, ThyPRO-39 composite score, TPOAb level, or selenium status at baseline did not significantly change the results. TPOAb levels after 12 months of intervention were lower in the selenium group than in the placebo group (1995 [95%CI:1512-2512] vs. 2344 kIU/L [1862-2951]; P=0.016) but did not influence LT4 dosage or free triiodothyronine/free thyroxin ratio. CONCLUSION:In hypothyroid patients on LT4 therapy due to autoimmune thyroiditis, daily supplementation with 200 μg selenium or placebo for 12 months improved QoL to the same extent.