40 Background: Disparities in clinical trial enrollment are well documented, yet little attention is paid to genomic testing as a barrier. SURGE aims to increase rates of genomic testing, representation and access to genomics-based clinical trials. Here, we describe early findings. Methods: SURGE is a randomized feasibility phase II prospective clinical trial. Eligible participants include any adult age ≥18, diagnosed with advanced solid tumor malignancy or lymphoma, seeking care at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute since April 2023. Participants completed a 4-item validated survey attesting awareness and readiness of tumor somatic genomic testing and trials at consultation and were randomized to standard of care discussion with their assigned oncologist or video-based education +/- 1:1 genomic testing navigation. Genomic testing was completed by the Brigham and Women’s Hospital Center for Advanced Molecular Diagnostics, a CLIA-certified laboratory using OncoPanel (450 gene hybrid capture and next-generation sequencing panel) or Rapid Heme Panel (RHP; 88 gene hybrid-capture and amplicon-based next-generation sequencing panel). Results are reported by tier of pathogenicity and actionability with Tier 1 as most actionable, Tier 4 least actionable for OncoPanel; or pathogenic/likely pathogenic vs variant of uncertain significance (VUS) for RHP. Rates of genomic testing consent, completion, and navigation were collected with patient demographics and disease status. Results: From April 2023-July 2025, 40 adults (including 2 Black, 3 Latinx, 22 older adults 65+) consented (n=17 lung cancer, 6 colon, 2 cholangiocarcinoma, 2 pancreatic). Survey responses were as follows (respondents=36): 25 responded “yes” to awareness of and 27 to readiness for testing, 29 to awareness of and 27 to readiness for trials. 18 were randomized to standard of care, 5 to video-based education, and 18 to video + navigation. Of those consented, 25/30 patients had an OncoPanel test ordered by their provider (24 tumor-only, 1 paired tumor-germline; 2 had both OncoPanel + RHP ordered and resulted. Twenty-two OncoPanel samples resulted; 3 failed (2 - insufficient tumor, 1 - failed DNA extraction). Mean genomic testing turnaround time (TAT): 24 days (range 10-49); 6 (27%) Tier 1 as highest tier, 14 (64%) Tier 2, 2 (9%) Tier 3. Mean RHP TAT: 12.5 days (range 11-14); 1 highest Tier pathogenic, 1 highest Tier VUS. Two participants consented to clinical trial. Conclusions: Early SURGE findings indicate higher than previously reported rates of consent to genomic testing (83% vs. 40%) and actionable genomic alteration findings (88% vs. 73%). Enrollment is ongoing with pending analysis to correlate video-based education with or without navigation on genomic testing consent rates. Rigorous attention to genomic testing as an essential prerequisite to increase representation in genomics-based clinical trials is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT05375643 .
Genomic profiling of cancers informs diagnostic and prognostic classification and aids in selection of targeted therapeutics. Targeted, next-generation sequencing of cancer-specific genes is clinically feasible and enables comprehensive somatic reporting; without a matched germline specimen, germline alterations can confound analyses of the somatic profile and generate uncertainty in interpretation. This work reports the validation and implementation of optional matched tumor/germline sequencing in a precision cancer medicine program. DNA from 63 patient samples was analyzed using OncoPanel, a hybrid capture-based sequencing assay of 461 genes. Three analytical pipelines were implemented: tumor only, matched tumor/germline, and germline only. For matched tumor/germline, germline alterations in 19 genes with actionable/therapeutic implications were rescued. Retrospective analysis of the first 1600 matched cases was done to determine the potential clinical utility of this approach. Limit of detection for point mutations/insertions and deletions was 3% allele fraction; reproducibility was >98%. Matched tumor/germline concordance across 938 somatic calls was 100%. The average tumor mutational burden (TMB) was approximately 4 mutations/Mb lower than tumor-only sequencing. TMB-high patients were accurately reclassified as TMB-low in 14% of cases. Twenty-five percent of validation cases (14% after launch) had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variant conferring cancer susceptibility; 14% of validation cases (7% after launch) harbored a germline variant of therapeutic significance. Matched tumor/germline sequencing is more accurate than tumor-only sequencing, while still encompassing all genomic findings that inform targeted therapy selection.
Brain metastasis (BM) is a rare but severe complication of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), with limited knowledge of molecular characteristics and immunogenicity. We analyzed 61 cases of HNSCC-BM from three academic institutions (n = 24) and Foundation Medicine Inc (FMI, n = 37). A subset of cases underwent next-generation sequencing, multiple immunofluorescence, and proximity ligation sequencing. Gene enrichment analysis compared alterations in FMI BM samples (n = 37) with local samples (n = 4082). Demographics included: median age of 59 years, 75
6036 Background: BM is a rare complication of HNSCC that carries a high rate of morbidity and poor prognosis. Clinical risk factors, molecular characteristics, and the immunogenicity of HNSCC BM are not well defined, leaving a critical knowledge gap in this field. We performed one of the largest multi-institutional analyses summarizing the clinical, molecular, and immunologic profile of 61 cases of BM-HNSCC. Methods: We conducted a pooled analysis of the clinical characteristics pertaining to BM-HNSCC from 3 academic institutions (n=24). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and immune profiling (IP) of primary and BM specimens was conducted on a subset of cases (n=19 and n=16, respectively); there were 3 paired samples for NGS and 0 for IP. Four samples (2 BM and 2 non-BM) were submitted to Phase Genomics, Inc for evaluation of structural variants in BM genomes by proximity ligation sequencing (PLS). These results were complimented by a comparative analysis of genomic alterations in an additional cohort of BM (n=37) and local samples (n=4082) submitted for NGS at Foundation Medicine, Inc (FMI). Statistical comparisons were done using Fisher’s exact testing of 2x2 contingency tables with p-values controlled for FDR by the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. Results: Clinical features were as follows: median age at diagnosis 59 years, 75% male, 55% current/former smokers, 75% oropharyngeal primary, and 84% HPV+ or p16+. The most frequently altered genes in BM specimens (62% HPV/p16+) were ATM (54%), KMT2A (54%), PTEN (46%), RB1 (46%), and TP53 (46%). BM and non-BM samples demonstrated significant levels of structural rearrangement ranging from 9 to 90 variants by PLS. IP identified lower densities of CD8+, PD1+, PDL1+, and FOXP3+ cells in BMs compared to primary tumors. PDL1 combined positive scores were <1% in 12/13 unpaired samples (92%; 10 BM and 2 primary). The FMI BM-HNSCC cohort (51% HPV+) identified CDKN2A (40.5%), TP53 (37.8%), and PIK3CA (27.0%) as the most frequently altered genes. Enrichment analysis of the FMI cohort showed MAP2K2 alterations significantly enriched in BM (11.8% vs 6.4%, P=0.005) and TSC1 alterations significantly enriched in the local site (67.3% vs 37.8%, P=0.008). HPV+ was also significantly enriched in the BM cohort (51.25% vs 26.11%, P=0.001). Overall survival from BM diagnosis was 6m (range 0-27m). Conclusions: HNSCC patients with BM have higher-than-expected proportions of oropharyngeal primary site and HPV/p16-positivity. The most frequent molecular alterations in BM samples are also commonly found in non-BM HNSCC, including targetable PIK3CA alterations. MAP2K2 alterations were significantly enriched in BM compared to non-BM samples, which warrants further investigation. BM samples also tended to have lower markers of immunogenicity. This latter finding could have important clinical implications when considering immunotherapy or immune-modulating drugs.
To inform clinical trial design and real-world precision pediatric oncology practice, we classified diagnoses, assessed the landscape of mutations, and identified genomic variants matching trials in a large unselected institutional cohort of solid tumors patients sequenced at Dana-Farber / Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center. Tumors were sequenced with OncoPanel, a targeted next-generation DNA sequencing panel. Diagnoses were classified according to the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O-3.2). Over 6.5 years, 888 pediatric cancer patients with 95 distinct diagnoses had successful tumor sequencing. Overall, 33% (n = 289/888) of patients had at least 1 variant matching a precision oncology trial protocol, and 14% (41/289) were treated with molecularly targeted therapy. This study highlights opportunities to use genomic data from hospital-based sequencing performed either for research or clinical care to inform ongoing and future precision oncology clinical trials. Furthermore, the study results emphasize the importance of data sharing to define the genomic landscape and targeted treatment opportunities for the large group of rare pediatric cancers we encounter in clinical practice.
Metastasis is responsible for the majority of prostate cancer-related deaths; however, little is known about the molecular mechanisms that underlie this process. Here we identify an oncogene-tumor suppressor cascade that promotes prostate cancer growth and metastasis by coordinately activating the small GTPase Ras and nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B). Specifically, we show that loss of the Ras GTPase-activating protein (RasGAP) gene DAB2IP induces metastatic prostate cancer in an orthotopic mouse tumor model. Notably, DAB2IP functions as a signaling scaffold that coordinately regulates Ras and NF-kappa B through distinct domains to promote tumor growth and metastasis, respectively. DAB2IP is suppressed in human prostate cancer, where its expression inversely correlates with tumor grade and predicts prognosis. Moreover, we report that epigenetic silencing of DAB2IP is a key mechanism by which the polycomb-group protein histone-lysine N-methyltransferase EZH2 activates Ras and NF-kappa B and triggers metastasis. These studies define the mechanism by which two major pathways can be simultaneously activated in metastatic prostate cancer and establish EZH2 as a driver of metastasis.
Supplementary File 11 from Genome-Wide Functional Synergy between Amplified and Mutated Genes in Human Breast Cancer
Univariate and multivariate analysis of PRKDC and TP53 loss with progression-free and overall survival following immune checkpoint-inhibitor-based therapies
Supplemental Methods. Supplemental Table 1: ââ,¬â€¹Genomic Data Characterization by Center. Supplemental Table 2: ââ,¬â€¹Gene Panels Submitted by Each Center. Figure S1: Number of putative germline SNPs per sample, before and after uniform germline filtering. Figure S2ââ,¬â€¹. Distribution of total somatic mutation burden per sample stratified by sequencing panel. Figure S3: ââ,¬â€¹Log-scale comparison of mutation frequencies at hotspot sites between GENIE (data aggregated from all sequencing panels) and cancerhotspots.org (CHS) using a binomial test. Figure S4:ââ,¬â€¹ Comparison of mutation frequencies at hotspot sites in each GENIE sequencing panel with cancerhotspots.org (CHS) using a binomial test.
Supplementary File 12 from Genome-Wide Functional Synergy between Amplified and Mutated Genes in Human Breast Cancer
Supplementary File 2 from Genome-Wide Functional Synergy between Amplified and Mutated Genes in Human Breast Cancer
Background. Patients (pts) who develop MBC at older ages are underrepresented in clinical trials, are less likely to be included in comprehensive biomarker characterization studies, and experience worse breast cancer-specific survival than their younger counterparts. Elucidating genomic underpinnings of MBC and possible therapeutic targets for older breast cancer patients are critical priorities. Methods. We identified pts age >70 years at MBC diagnosis and a younger cohort (ages 50-69; age < 50), who were treated for MBC at a single center and who had their metastatic (or if not available, the primary) tumor, assessed by a targeted, tumor-only next generation sequencing (NGS) platform (OncoPanel) between 2013-2020. The NGS panel included mutations, copy number variation, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and hypermutation (HM) status, with mutations classified as oncogenic using the OncoKB tool and additional annotation. Copy number events were selected as being “oncogenic” if a high amplification was called for an oncogene or a deep deletion for a tumor suppressor. We compared findings for older (age >70) vs. younger (age < 50 and ages 50-69) MBC pts using Chi-Square and Kruskal-Wallis tests. To determine genomic event enrichment, logistic regression (LR) models were used, controlling for age (continuous), background rate, and tumor subtype (those with unknown subtype [n=27] were excluded from models). False discovery rate (FDR) was used to correct for multiple hypothesis testing. Results. The final analytic cohort included 2,380 pts. The median age at MBC diagnosis was 54.1 years overall (range 18.5- 91.9) and 73.6 years for those age >70. A total of 137 metastatic and 76 primary tumors were sequenced in pts age >70; in those age < 70, 1383 metastatic and 784 primary tumors were sequenced (for age < 50 [n=857] and 50-69 [n=1310]). Older pts were more likely to present with HR+/HER2- tumors (70.9% v. 62.4% v. 52.4%), and less likely to present with HER2+ (9.4% v. 14.4% v. 22.8%) or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (18.8% v. 21.9% vs. 24.0%) at MBC diagnosis (listed >70, 50-69, < 50; P=1e-7). Older pts had higher average TMB vs. younger pts (9.57 in pts > 70, 8.56 in ages 50-69, 7.34 in ages < 50; P=3.5e-5). This was due to older pts having a higher incidence of hypermutation status as defined as TMB >10: 26.3% in age >70, 23.2% in ages 50-69, 16.8% in age < 50. Using q=0.1 as the threshold of significance, the presence of CDH1, PIK3CA, MAP3K1, TET2, and AKT oncogenic mutations were also enriched in older pts, while the presence of oncogenic GATA3, BRCA2, and TP53 mutations, as well as any mutation in BRCA1 were enriched in younger pts (too few oncogenic BRCA1 mutations were present for accurate modeling). The frequency of oncogenic PIK3CA mutations in HR+/HER2- tumors was highest in the oldest pts (44.4% in pts age >70 v. 31.6% in age 50-69 v. 26.7% in age < 50). Of pts who had oncogenic BRCA1/2 mutations identified on tumor-only NGS testing and underwent clinical germline testing (n=7 v. 60 v. 67, oldest to youngest), older pts had the lowest incidence of germline BRCA pathogenic variants (14.3% vs. 47.2.% vs. 67.2%; p=0.01); most BRCA mutations identified on NGS testing in older patients were considered likely somatic. When assessing enrichment in copy number events, ERBB2, RAD21, and BRIP1 amplifications were all significantly less frequent in older pts (q< 0.1), even when accounting for tumor subtype. Conclusions. In a large cohort of pts with MBC, the mutational and copy number landscape for older pts differs from that in younger pts, even after controlling for tumor subtype. Key actionable findings include a higher proportion of high TMB and PIK3CA-mutated tumors, emphasizing the importance of genomic profile testing in this pt population and further exploration of efficacy and tolerability of relevant therapies in those age >70 years. Citation Format: Hersh V. Gupta, Rachel Freedman, Melissa E. Hughes, Yvonne Y. Li, Gregory Kirkner, Janet L. Files, Sarah Strauss, Ana C. Garrido-Castro, Lauren Buckley, Romualdo Barroso-Sousa, Brittany Bychkovsky, Sara Tolaney, Laura MacConaill, Neal Lindeman, Bruce Johnson, Matthew Meyerson, Eric Winer, Deborah A. Dillon, Andrew Cherniack, Nancy U. Lin. Tumor Genomic Landscape in Older Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-14-06.