An understanding of spousal dementia caregivers' coping strategies and their predictive factors is imperative for caregivers' well-being. Although several reviews have explored the relationship between coping strategies and outcomes, no review has investigated factors that predict caregivers' use of one type of coping strategy over another. The current review aimed to identify factors that predict caregivers' coping strategies. Within this, we attempted to identify caregivers who are more likely to adopt dysfunctional coping strategies and be at risk of adverse outcomes. Several electronic databases were systematically searched. Twenty-one studies were eligible for review, describing 18 caregiver and care-recipient factors related to the 3 coping strategies. No factors were classified predictive, however, 16 factors were potentially predictive. Younger, more highly educated caregivers with greater emotional supports and knowledge of dementia were associated with solution-focused coping. Younger, less educated caregivers were associated with emotional support/acceptance-based coping strategies. Whereas nonwhite caregivers with less emotional supports caregiving for persons with more behavioral problems were associated with dysfunctional coping strategies. Enhancing caregiver self-efficacy, knowledge of dementia, improving social supports, linking to support groups, managing behavioral problems, as well as coaching adaptive coping strategies while flagging caregivers at risk for dysfunctional coping may improve outcomes for caregivers.

Background: Caregiving for a person with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is related to poor caregiver outcomes. Coping strategies adopted by caregivers are known to influence psychological outcomes in other dementia caregiver populations, however, their influence on psychological outcomes in FTD caregivers is poorly understood at present. Methods: Questionnaire data for 94 German primary caregivers (mean [ M] 59.11 years, 68 females) of FTD care-recipients living in the community ( M 63.94, 30 females) were investigated. Standardized measures completed by the caregiver included the Caregiver Strain Index (CSI), Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), Quality of Life-Alzheimer’s Disease (QoL-AD), and the Brief Coping Orientations to Problems Experienced (COPE). Care-recipients’ nursing care level was collected as a measure of the intensity of their care needs. Results: Mediation analyses showed that the effect of the intensity of care-recipients’ care needs on caregiver well-being depended on caregivers’ experience of strain. High levels of caregiver strain did not predict depression (−0.22, 95% confidence interval CI: [0.16 to 2.04]) but predicted reduced QoL (−0.44, CI: [−1.15 to −.16]). Moreover, caregivers’ experience of strain was exacerbated by their use of dysfunctional coping (β = .21; p = .04), care-recipients’ intensity of care needs (β = .25; p = .01), and fewer financial resources (β = .23; p = .02). In turn, caregivers’ use of dysfunctional coping as a response to their strain increased the levels of depression (0.46, CI: [0.19-0.82]). By contrast, use of problem-focused coping strategies increased caregivers’ QoL (0.10, CI: [0.00 to 0.31]). Significance: This study identifies variables amenable to clinical interventions that can improve caregivers’ well-being: specifically, caregiver strain and coping strategies. For a disease without cure yet increasing prevalence and cost, ameliorating the caregiver experience through targeted interventions is essential.