We develop a unified framework to characterize the power of higher-level algorithms for the constraint satisfaction problem (CSP), such as k-consistency, the Sherali-Adams LP hierarchy, and the affine IP hierarchy. As a result, solvability of a fixed-template CSP or, more generally, a Promise CSP by a given level is shown to depend only on the polymorphism minion of the template. Similarly, we obtain a minion-theoretic description of k-consistency reductions between Promise CSPs. We introduce a new hierarchy of SDP-like vector relaxations with vectors over ℤ_p in which orthogonality is imposed on k-tuples of vectors. Surprisingly, this relaxation turns out to be equivalent to the k-th level of the AIP-ℤ_p relaxation. We show that it solves the CSP of the dihedral group 𝐃_4, the smallest CSP that fools the singleton BLP+AIP algorithm. Using this vector representation, we further show that the p-th level of the ℤ_p relaxation solves linear equations modulo p^2.

In this paper we study the interactions between so-called fractional relaxations of the integer programs (IPs) which encode homomorphism and isomorphism of relational structures. We give a combinatorial characterization of a certain natural linear programming (LP) relaxation of homomorphism in terms of fractional isomorphism. As a result, we show that the families of constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) that are solvable by such linear program are precisely those that are closed under an equivalence relation which we call Weisfeiler-Leman invariance. We also generalize this result to the much broader framework of Promise Valued Constraint Satisfaction Problems, which brings together two well-studied extensions of the CSP framework. Finally, we consider the hierarchies of increasingly tighter relaxations of the homomorphism and isomorphism IPs obtained by applying the Sherali-Adams and Weisfeiler-Leman methods respectively. We extend our combinatorial characterization of the basic LP to higher levels of the Sherali-Adams hierarchy, and we generalize a well-known logical characterization of the Weisfeiler-Leman test from graphs to relational structures.

Many fundamental mathematical structures, such as the rationals or the random graph, are homogeneous, meaning that local isomorphisms extend to global automorphisms. Such structures arise as limits of classes of finite structures and encode these classes in a single object. This viewpoint has proved fruitful in model theory, universal algebra, and computer science, with applications to constraint satisfaction, automata theory, and verification. Homogeneous structures have rich automorphism groups, which makes them interesting for topological dynamics. For many applications, however, automorphism groups do not store enough information about the homogeneous structure, and one must instead consider polymorphism clones. Universal algebra has recently achieved major results for polymorphism clones on finite structures, culminating in the 2017 resolution of the Feder–Vardi dichotomy conjecture. An analogous conjecture for homogeneous structures remains open despite growing structural insights.

We introduce the framework of the left-hand side restricted promise constraint satisfaction problem, which includes problems like approximating clique number of a graph. We study the parameterized complexity of problems in this class and provide some initial results. The main technical contribution is a sufficient condition for W[1]-hardness which, in particular, covers left-hand side restricted bounded arity CSPs.

This paper focuses on the algebraic theory underlying the study of the complexity and the algorithms for the Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP). We unify, simplify, and extend parts of the three approaches that have been developed to study the CSP over finite templates -- absorption theory that was used to characterize CSPs solvable by local consistency methods (JACM'14), and Bulatov's and Zhuk's theories that were used for two independent proofs of the CSP Dichotomy Theorem (FOCS'17, JACM'20). As the first contribution we present an elementary theorem about primitive positive definability and use it to obtain the starting points of Bulatov's and Zhuk's proofs as corollaries. As the second contribution we propose and initiate a systematic study of minimal Taylor algebras. This class of algebras is broad enough that it suffices to verify the CSP Dichotomy Theorem on this class only, but still is unusually well behaved. In particular, many concepts from the three approaches coincide in this class, which is in striking contrast with the general setting. We believe that the theory initiated in this paper will eventually result in a simple and more natural proof of the Dichotomy Theorem that employs a simpler and more efficient algorithm, and will help in attacking complexity questions in other CSP-related problems.

We provide an internal characterization of those finite algebras (i.e., algebraic structures) A such that the number of homomorphisms from any finite algebra X to A is bounded from above by a polynomial in the size of X. Namely, an algebra A has this property if, and only if, no subalgebra of A has a nontrivial strongly abelian congruence. We also show that the property can be decided in polynomial time for algebras in finite signatures. Moreover, if A is such an algebra, the set of all homomorphisms from X to A can be computed in polynomial time given X as input. As an application of our results to the field of computational complexity, we characterize inherently tractable constraint satisfaction problems over fixed finite structures, i.e., those that are tractable and remain tractable after expanding the fixed structure by arbitrary relations or functions.

We describe the ordering of a class of clones by minion homomorphisms, also known as minor preserving maps or height 1 clone homomorphisms. The class consists of all clones on finite sets determined by binary relations whose projections to both coordinates have at most two elements. This class can be alternatively described up to minion homomorphisms as the class of multisorted Boolean clones determined by binary relations. We also introduce and apply the concept of a minion core which provides canonical representatives for equivalence classes of clones, more generally minions, on finite sets.

Following the success of the so-called algebraic approach to the study of decision constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs), exact optimization of valued CSPs, and most recently promise CSPs, we propose an algebraic framework for valued promise CSPs. To every valued promise CSP we associate an algebraic object, its so-called valued minion. Our main result shows that the existence of a homomorphism between the associated valued minions implies a polynomial-time reduction between the original CSPs. We also show that this general reduction theorem includes important inapproximability results, for instance, the inapproximability of almost solvable systems of linear equations beyond the random assignment threshold.

We investigate structural implications arising from the condition that a given directed graph does not interpret, in the sense of primitive positive interpretation with parameters or orbits, every finite structure. Our results generalize several theorems from the literature and yield further algebraic invariance properties that must be satisfied in every such graph. Algebraic properties of this kind are tightly connected to the tractability of constraint satisfaction problems, and we obtain new such properties even for infinite countably categorical graphs. We balance these positive results by showing the existence of a countably categorical hypergraph that fails to interpret some finite structure, while still lacking some of the most essential algebraic invariance properties known to hold for finite structures.

In a recent line of work, Butti and Dalmau have shown that a fixed-template Constraint Satisfaction Problem is solvable by a certain natural linear programming relaxation (equivalent to the basic linear programming relaxation) if and only if it is solvable on a certain distributed network, and this happens if and only if its set of Yes instances is closed under Weisfeiler-Leman equivalence. We generalize this result to the much broader framework of fixed-template Promise Valued Constraint Satisfaction Problems. Moreover, we show that two commonly used linear programming relaxations are no longer equivalent in this broader framework.

The fixed-template constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) can be seen as the problem of deciding whether a given primitive positive first-order sentence is true in a fixed structure (also called model). We study a class of problems that generalizes the CSP simultaneously in two directions: we fix a set $\mathcal{L}$ of quantifiers and Boolean connectives, and we specify two versions of each constraint, one strong and one weak. Given a sentence which only uses symbols from $\mathcal{L}$, the task is to distinguish whether the sentence is true in the strong sense, or it is false even in the weak sense. We classify the computational complexity of these problems for the existential positive equality-free fragment of first-order logic, i.e., $\mathcal{L} = \{\exists,\land,\lor\}$, and we prove some upper and lower bounds for the positive equality-free fragment, $\mathcal{L} = \{\exists,\forall,\land,\lor\}$. The partial results are sufficient, e.g., for all extensions of the latter fragment.

A value of a CSP instance is typically defined as a fraction of constraints that can be simultaneously met. We propose an alternative definition of a value of an instance and show that, for purely combinatorial reasons, a value of an unsolvable instance is bounded away from one; we call this fact a gap theorem. We show that the gap theorem implies NP-hardness of a gap version of the Layered Label Cover Problem. The same result can be derived from the PCP Theorem, but a full, self-contained proof of our reduction is quite short and the result can still provide PCP-free NP-hardness proofs for numerous problems. The simplicity of our reasoning also suggests that weaker versions of Unique-Games-type conjectures, e.g., the d-to-1 conjecture, might be accessible and serve as an intermediate step for proving these conjectures in their full strength. As the second, main application we provide a sufficient condition under which a fixed template Promise Constraint Satisfaction Problem (PCSP) reduces to another PCSP. The correctness of the reduction hinges on the gap theorem, but the reduction itself is very simple. As a consequence, we obtain that every CSP can be canonically reduced to most of the known NP-hard PCSPs, such as the approximate hypergraph coloring problem.

There exist two conjectures for constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) of reducts of finitely bounded homogeneous structures: the first one states that tractability of the CSP of such a structure is, when the structure is a model-complete core, equivalent to its polymorphism clone satisfying a certain nontrivial linear identity modulo outer embeddings. The second conjecture, challenging the approach via model-complete cores by reflections, states that tractability is equivalent to the linear identities (without outer embeddings) satisfied by its polymorphisms clone, together with the natural uniformity on it, being nontrivial. We prove that the identities satisfied in the polymorphism clone of a structure allow for conclusions about the orbit growth of its automorphism group, and apply this to show that the two conjectures are equivalent. We contrast this with a counterexample showing that [Formula: see text]-categoricity alone is insufficient to imply the equivalence of the two conditions above in a model-complete core. Taking another approach, we then show how the Ramsey property of a homogeneous structure can be utilized for obtaining a similar equivalence under different conditions. We then prove that any polymorphism of sufficiently large arity which is totally symmetric modulo outer embeddings of a finitely bounded structure can be turned into a nontrivial system of linear identities, and obtain nontrivial linear identities for all tractable cases of reducts of the rational order, the random graph, and the random poset. Finally, we provide a new and short proof, in the language of monoids, of the theorem stating that every [Formula: see text]-categorical structure is homomorphically equivalent to a model-complete core.

The Promise Constraint Satisfaction Problem (PCSP) is a recently introduced vast generalization of the Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP). We investigate the computational complexity of a class of PCSPs beyond the most studied cases - approximation variants of satisfiability and graph coloring problems. We give an almost complete classification for the class of PCSPs of the form: given a 3-uniform hypergraph that has an admissible 2-coloring, find an admissible 3-coloring, where admissibility is given by a ternary symmetric relation. The only PCSP of this sort whose complexity is left open in this work is a natural hypergraph coloring problem, where admissibility is given by the relation "if two colors are equal, then the remaining one is higher."

We initiate a systematic study of the computational complexity of the Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) over finite structures that may contain both relations and operations. We show the close connection between this problem and a natural algebraic question: which finite algebras admit only polynomially many homomorphisms into them?We give some sufficient and some necessary conditions for a finite algebra to have this property. In particular, we show that every finite equationally nontrivial algebra has this property which gives us, as a simple consequence, a complete complexity classification of CSPs over two-element structures, thus extending the classification for two-element relational structures by Schaefer (STOC’78).We also present examples of two-element structures that have bounded width but do not have relational width (2,3), thus demonstrating that, from a descriptive complexity perspective, allowing operations leads to a richer theory.

This paper focuses on the algebraic theory underlying the study of the complexity and the algorithms for the Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP). We unify, simplify, and extend parts of the three approaches that have been developed to study the CSP over finite templates – absorption theory that was used to characterize CSPs solvable by local consistency methods (JACM’14), and Bulatov’s and Zhuk’s theories that were used for two independent proofs of the CSP Dichotomy Theorem (FOCS’17, JACM’20).As the first contribution we present an elementary theorem about primitive positive definability and use it to obtain the starting points of Bulatov’s and Zhuk’s proofs as corollaries. As the second contribution we propose and initiate a systematic study of minimal Taylor algebras. This class of algebras is broad enough so that it suffices to verify the CSP Dichotomy Theorem on this class only, but still is unusually well behaved. In particular, many concepts from the three approaches coincide in the class, which is in striking contrast with the general setting.We believe that the theory initiated in this paper will eventually result in a simple and more natural proof of the Dichotomy Theorem that employs a simpler and more efficient algorithm, and will help in attacking complexity questions in other CSP-related problems.

We investigate the impact of modifying the constraining relations of a Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) instance, with a fixed template, on the set of solutions of the instance. More precisely we investigate sensitive instances: an instance of the CSP is called sensitive, if removing any tuple from any constraining relation invalidates some solution of the instance. Equivalently, one could require that every tuple from any one of its constraints extends to a solution of the instance. Clearly, any non-trivial template has instances which are not sensitive. Therefore we follow the direction proposed (in the context of strict width) by Feder and Vardi (SICOMP 1999) and require that only the instances produced by a local consistency checking algorithm are sensitive. In the language of the algebraic approach to the CSP we show that a finite idempotent algebra $\mathbf{A}$ has a $k+2$ variable near unanimity term operation if and only if any instance that results from running the $(k, k+1)$-consistency algorithm on an instance over $\mathbf{A}^2$ is sensitive. A version of our result, without idempotency but with the sensitivity condition holding in a variety of algebras, settles a question posed by G. Bergman about systems of projections of algebras that arise from some subalgebra of a finite product of algebras. Our results hold for infinite (albeit in the case of $\mathbf{A}$ idempotent) algebras as well and exhibit a surprising similarity to the strict width $k$ condition proposed by Feder and Vardi. Both conditions can be characterized by the existence of a near unanimity operation, but the arities of the operations differ by 1.

The tractability conjecture for finite domain constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) stated that such CSPs are solvable in polynomial time whenever there is no natural reduction, in some precise technical sense, from the 3-SAT problem; otherwise, they are NP-complete. Its recent resolution draws on an algebraic characterization of the conjectured borderline: the CSP of a finite structure permits no natural reduction from 3-SAT if and only if the stabilizer of the polymorphism clone of the core of the structure satisfies some nontrivial system of identities, and such satisfaction is always witnessed by several specific nontrivial systems of identities which do not depend on the structure. The tractability conjecture has been generalized in the above formulation to a certain class of infinite domain CSPs, namely, CSPs of reducts of finitely bounded homogeneous structures. It was subsequently shown that the conjectured borderline between hardness and tractability, i.e., a natural reduction from 3-SAT, can be characterized for this class by a combination of algebraic and topological properties. However, it was not known whether the topological component is essential in this characterization. We provide a negative answer to this question by proving that the borderline is characterized by one specific algebraic identity, namely, the pseudo-Siggers identity $\alpha s(x,y,x,z,y,z) \approx \beta s(y,x,z,x,z,y)$. This accomplishes one of the steps of a proposed strategy for reducing the infinite domain CSP dichotomy conjecture to the finite case. Our main theorem is also of independent mathematical interest, characterizing a topological property of any $\omega$-categorical core structure (the existence of a continuous homomorphism of a stabilizer of its polymorphism clone to the projections) in purely algebraic terms (the failure of an identity as above).

We show that for a fixed Boolean structure $\mathscr B$ of arbitrary finite signature---i.e., not necessarily purely relational---the problem of deciding whether there exists a homomorphism to $\mathscr B$ is either in P or NP-complete.

The Promise Constraint Satisfaction Problem (PCSP) is a generalization of the Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) that includes approximation variants of satisfiability and graph coloring problems. Barto [LICS '19] has shown that a specific PCSP, the problem to find a valid Not-All-Equal solution to a 1-in-3-SAT instance, is not finitely tractable in that it can be solved by a trivial reduction to a tractable CSP, but such a CSP is necessarily over an infinite domain (unless P=NP). We initiate a systematic study of this phenomenon by giving a general necessary condition for finite tractability and characterizing finite tractability within a class of templates - the "basic" tractable cases in the dichotomy theorem for symmetric Boolean PCSPs allowing negations by Brakensiek and Guruswami [SODA'18].