This prospective, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial examined the effects of intravenous delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (d9-THC) on the pupillary light reflex and pupil size in volunteers not regularly consuming cannabis. With ethics committee approval and written informed consent, healthy cannabis-naïve or abstinent volunteers were included. Fifteen volunteers received an intravenous bolus of d9-THC and four received placebo. Pupillary reaction and pupil size were assessed by pupillography before and for 5 h after drug administration. Primary outcome was relative amplitude. Secondary outcomes were latency, velocity of contraction, constriction time, contraction amplitude, and pupil diameter. Pupillographic measurements were significantly altered by THC: The relative amplitude was significantly reduced with a global difference between groups (p = 0.001). The relative amplitude significantly declined at 20 min after THC administration (23.5–15.0

BACKGROUND Many studies have addressed safety and effectiveness of non-anaesthesiologist propofol sedation (NAPS) for gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy Target controlled infusion (TCI) is claimed to provide an optimal sedation regimen by avoiding under- or oversedation. AIM To assess safety and performance of propofol TCI sedation in comparison with nurse-administered bolus-sedation. METHODS Fouty-five patients undergoing endoscopy under TCI propofol sedation were prospectively included from November 2016 to May 2017 and compared to 87 patients retrospectively included that underwent endoscopy with NAPS. Patients were matched for age and endoscopic procedure. We recorded time of sedation and endoscopy, dosage of medication and adverse events. RESULTS There was a significant reduction in dose per time of propofol administered in the TCI group, compared to the NAPS group (8.2 ± 2.7 mg/min vs 9.3 ± 3.4 mg/min; P = 0.046). The time needed to provide adequate sedation levels was slightly but significantly lower in the control group (5.3 ± 2.7 min vs 7.7 ± 3.3 min; P < 0.001), nonetheless the total endoscopy time was similar in both groups. No differences between TCI and bolus-sedation was observed for mean total-dosage of propofol rate as well as adverse events. CONCLUSION This study indicates that sedation using TCI for GI endoscopy reduces the dose of propofol necessary per minute of endoscopy. This may translate into less adverse events. However, further and randomized trials need to confirm this trend.

Abstract Background Dexmedetomidine and propofol are common sedatives in intensive care units and for interventional procedures. Both may compromise sinus node function and atrioventricular conduction. The objective of this prospective, randomized study is to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine with propofol on sinus node function and atrioventricular conduction. Methods In a tertiary care center in Switzerland we included from September 2019 to October 2020 160 patients (65 ± 11 years old; 32% female) undergoing first ablation for atrial fibrillation by cryoballoon ablation or by radiofrequency ablation. Patients were randomly assigned to deep sedation with dexmedetomidine (DEX group) versus propofol (PRO group). A standard electrophysiological study was performed after pulmonary vein isolation with the patients still deeply sedated and hemodynamically stable. Results Eighty patients each were randomized to the DEX and PRO group. DEX group patients had higher baseline sinus cycle length (1022 vs. 1138 ms; p = 0.003) and longer sinus node recovery time (SNRT400; 1597 vs. 1412 ms; p = 0.042). However, both corrected SNRT and normalized SNRT did not differ. DEX group patients had longer PR interval (207 vs. 186 ms; p = 0.002) and AH interval (111 vs. 95 ms, p = 0.008), longer Wenckebach cycle length of the atrioventricular node (512 vs. 456 ms; p = 0.005), and longer atrioventricular node effective refractory period (390 vs. 344 ms; p = 0.009). QRS width and HV interval were not different. An arrhythmia, mainly atrial fibrillation, was induced in 33 patients during the electrophysiological study, without differences among groups (20% vs. 15%, p = 0.533). Conclusions Dexmedetomidine has a more pronounced slowing effect on sinus rate and suprahissian AV conduction than propofol, but not on infrahissian AV conduction and ventricular repolarization. These differences need to be taken into account when using these sedatives. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03844841, 19/02/2019

BackgroundMany serious adverse events in anaesthesia are retrospectively rated as preventable. Anonymous reporting of near misses to a critical incident reporting system (CIRS) can identify structural weaknesses and improve quality, but incidents are often underreported.MethodsThis prospective qualitative study aimed to identify conceptions of a CIRS and reasons for underreporting at a single Swiss centre. Anaesthesia cases were screened to identify critical airway-related incidents that qualified to be reported to the CIRS. Anaesthesia providers involved in these incidents were individually interviewed. Factors that prevented or encouraged reporting of critical incidents to the CIRS were evaluated. Interview data were analysed using the Framework method.ResultsOf 3668 screened airway management procedures, 101 cases (2.8%) involved a critical incident. Saturation was reached after interviewing 21 anaesthesia providers, who had been involved in 42/101 critical incidents (41.6%). Only one incident (1.0%) had been reported to the CIRS, demonstrating significant underreporting. Interviews revealed highly variable views on the aims of the CIRS with an overall high threshold for reporting a critical incident. Factors hindering reporting of cases included concerns regarding identifiability of the reported incident and involved healthcare providers.ConclusionsMethods to foster anonymity of reporting, such as by national rather than departmental critical incident reporting system databases, and a change in culture is required to enhance reporting of critical incidents. Institutions managing a critical incident reporting system need to ensure timely feedback to the team regarding lessons learned, consequences, and changes to standards of care owing to reported critical incidents. Consistent reporting and assessment of critical incidents is required to allow the full potential of a critical incident reporting system.

Apnoeic oxygenation has experienced a resurgence in interest in critical care and perioperative medicine. However, its effect on cerebral oxygenation and factors influencing it, have not yet been investigated in detail. By using near-infrared spectroscopy, we intended to provide further evidence for the safety of apnoeic oxygenation and to increase our understanding of the association between cerebral perfusion, haemodynamic, respiratory and demographic factors. In this secondary analysis of a prospective randomized controlled noninferiority trial, we recruited 125 patients, who underwent surgery under general anaesthesia with neuromuscular blockade. Arterial blood samples were taken every 2 min for a total of 15 min under apnoeic oxygenation with 100% oxygen. Near-infrared spectroscopy and cardiac output were continuously measured. Statistical analysis was performed using uni- and multivariable statistics. Ninety-one complete data sets were analysed. In six patients the SpO2 fell below 92% (predefined study termination criterion). The significant average increase of cerebral oxygenation was 0.5%/min and 2.1 mmHg/min for the arterial pressure of carbon dioxide (paCO2). The median cardiac output increased significantly from 5.0 l/min (IQR 4.5–6.0) to 6.5 l/min (IQR 5.7–7.5). The most significant effect on cerebral oxygenation was exhibited by the variable paCO2 and non-specific patient factors, followed by cardiac output and paO2. Apnoeic oxygenation proves to have a high safety profile while significantly increasing cerebral oxygenation, paCO2 and cardiac output. In reverse, NIRS might act as a reliable clinical surrogate of paCO2 and cardiac output during stable arterial oxygenation.

Abstract Background Cannabis is increasingly used and debates about the legalisation of the recreational use of cannabis are ongoing. In this prospective, placebo-controlled study in healthy volunteers not regularly consuming cannabis, subjective psychotropic and somatic effects after a single dose of intravenous THC were assessed and quantified over 48 h. Methods Twenty-five healthy volunteers received a single IV bolus of THC and 6 received normal saline. Psychotropic and somatic effects of THC were assessed by two questionnaires that were completed at up to 14 timepoints from shortly before drug administration to 48 h later. Results Demographic data did not differ between groups. Differences between THC and placebo for all assessed effects, except for euphoria, irritation and headache, were clearly discernible. Subdimensions related to positive mood were less and those related to negative mood were more pronounced in the THC group. Peak plasma concentrations were observed at 1 to 5 min after THC administration while peak effects occurred between 45 and 60 min. Differences between THC and placebo were pronounced and seen for up to 90 to 120 min for most effects, except for “sleepiness” and “deactivation”, where the effect of THC was discernible for up to 5 h. At 24 and 48 h, there were no statistically significant difference between THC and placebo group. Conclusions THC triggers a large range of psychotropic and somatic effects with peak effects at 45 to 60 min after IV administration of THC, much later than plasma peak levels. Most effects are short-lasting with a duration of up to 2 h, but some effects like sleepiness and deactivation can be longer-lasting and persist for 5 h or longer in cannabis-naïve or cannabis-abstinent individuals. Since effects of THC demonstrate a time course that differs from the time course of plasma concentrations it might be important to base the judgment of a possible impairment related to THC consumption on clinical or behavioral tests in addition to THC plasma levels. Trial registration www.isrctn.com; registration number ISRCTN53019164.

Background Tracheal intubation in neonates and infants is a potentially life-saving procedure. Video laryngoscopy has been found to improve first-attempt tracheal intubation success and reduce complications compared with direct laryngoscopy in children younger than 12 months. Supplemental periprocedural oxygen might increase the likelihood of successful first-attempt intubation because of an increase in safe apnoea time. We tested the hypothesis that direct laryngoscopy is not inferior to video laryngoscopy when using standard blades and supplemental oxygen is provided.Methods We did a non-inferiority, international, multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial, in which we randomly assigned neonates and infants aged up to 52 weeks postmenstrual age scheduled for elective tracheal intubation to either direct laryngoscopy or video laryngoscopy (1:1 ratio, randomly assigned using a secure online service) at seven tertiary paediatric hospitals across Australia, Canada, Italy, Switzerland, and the USA. An expected difficult intubation was the main exclusion criteria. Parents and patients were masked to the assigned group of treatment. All infants received supplemental oxygen (1 L/Kg per min) during laryngoscopy until the correct tracheal tube position was confirmed. The primary outcome was the proportion of first-attempt tracheal intubation success, defined as appearance of end-tidal CO2 curve at the anaesthesia monitor, between the two groups in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. A 10% non-inferiority margin between direct laryngoscopy or video laryngoscopy was applied. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04295902) and is now concluded.Findings Of 599 patients assessed, 250 patients were included between Oct 26, 2020, and March 11, 2022. 244 patients were included in the final modified intention-to-treat analysis. The median postmenstrual age on the day of intubation was 44 center dot 0 weeks (IQR 41 center dot 0-48 center dot 0) in the direct laryngoscopy group and 46 center dot 0 weeks (42 center dot 0-49 center dot 0) in the video laryngoscopy group, 34 (28%) were female in the direct laryngoscopy group and 38 (31%) were female in the video laryngoscopy group. First-attempt tracheal intubation success rate with no desaturation was higher with video laryngoscopy (89 center dot 3% [95% CI 83 center dot 7 to 94 center dot 8]; n=108/121) compared with direct laryngoscopy (78 center dot 9% [71 center dot 6 to 86 center dot 1]; n=97/123), with an adjusted absolute risk difference of 9 center dot 5% (0 center dot 8 to 18 center dot 1; p=0 center dot 033). The incidence of adverse events between the two groups was similar (-2 center dot 5% [95% CI -9 center dot 6 to 4 center dot 6]; p=0 center dot 490). Post-anaesthesia complications occurred seven times in six patients with no difference between the groups.Interpretation Video laryngoscopy with standard blades in combination with supplemental oxygen in neonates and infants might increase the success rate of first-attempt tracheal intubation, when compared with direct laryngoscopy with supplemental oxygen. The incidence of hypoxaemia increased with the number of attempts, but was similar between video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy. Video laryngoscopy with oxygen should be considered as the technique of choice when neonates and infants are intubated.

Abstract Summary Airway management in the critically ill patient is challenging and subject to higher risks of complications than in the setting of the operating theatre. Several factors contribute to this including severity of illness, location, adequate evaluation, and time pressures. It should be considered an advanced procedure, and the necessary level of training, expertise, and protocols should reduce known complications. A number of guidelines for upper airway evaluation, preparation, and management of the difficult airway are published. The application of local standards, which cover human factors, staffing, monitoring with capnography, equipment including videolaryngoscopes, airway adjuncts including bronchoscopy, and clear ‘Cannot Intubate, Cannot Oxygenate’ plans, which include emergency front-of-neck access, are crucial to best practice. This chapter addresses these issues and those of maintaining effective airway control during critical illness through reference to up-to-date international guidelines.

Background: Minor adverse airway events play a pivotal role in the safety of airway management. Changes in airway management strategies can reduce such events, but the broader impact on airway management remains unclear.Methods: Minor, frequently occurring adverse airway events were audited before and after implementation of changes to airway management strategies. We used two Bayesian networks to examine conditional probabilities of subsequent airway events and to compute the likelihood of certain events given that certain previous events occurred.Results: Independent of sex, age, and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, targeted changes to airway management strategies reduced the risk of a first event. Obese patients were an exception, in whom no risk reduction was achieved. Frequently occurring event sequences were identified, for example the most likely event to follow difficult bag-mask ventilation was a Cormack-Lehane grade >= 3, with a risk of 14.3% (95% credible interval [CI], 11.4-17.2%). An impact of the targeted changes was detected on the likelihood of some event sequences, for example the likelihood of no consecutive event after a tracheal tube-related event increased from 43.3% (95% CI, 39.4-47.6%) to 56.4% (95% CI, 52.0-60.5%).Conclusions: Identification of risk patterns and typical structures of event sequences provides a clinically relevant perspective on airway incidents. It further provides a means to quantify the impact of targeted airway management changes. These targeted changes can influence some event sequences, but overall, the benefit results from the cumu-lative effect of improvements in multiple events. Targeted airway management changes with knowledge of risk patterns and event sequences can potentially further improve patient safety in airway management.Clinical trial registration: NCT02743767.

Zusammenfassung Die Videolaryngoskopie hat sich in den letzten Jahren von der Back-up-Technik bei schwieriger direkter Laryngoskopie zum Standardverfahren für die endotracheale Intubation entwickelt. Der vorliegende Beitrag gibt eine kurze Übersicht über den aktuellen Stand der Wissenschaft zu diesem Thema. Mögliche „Nachteile“ der Videolaryngoskopie, die in Diskussionen immer wieder vorgebracht werden, sollen kritisch betrachtet werden.

Background High-flow nasal oxygenation is increasingly used during sedation procedures and general anesthesia in apneic patients. Transcutaneous CO 2 (p tc CO 2 )-monitoring is used to monitor hypercapnia. This study investigated p tc CO 2 -monitoring during apneic oxygenation. Methods We included 100 patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia in this secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Before surgery, we collected p tc CO 2 measured by TCM4 and TCM5 monitors and arterial blood gas (ABG) measurements every two minutes during 15 minutes of apnea. Bland-Altman plots analyzed agreement between measurement slopes; linear mixed models estimated the different measuring method effect, and outlined differences in slope and offset between transcutaneous and arterial CO 2 partial pressures. Results Bland-Altman plots showed a bias in slope (95% confidence intervals) between ABG and TCM4-measurements of 0.05mmHg/min (-0.05 to 0.15), and limits of agreement were -0.88mmHg/min (-1.06 to -0.70) and 0.98mmHg/min (0.81 to 1.16). Bias between ABG and TCM5 was -0.14mmHg/min (-0.23 to -0.04), and limits of agreement were -0.98mmHg/min (-1.14 to -0.83) and 0.71mmHg/min (0.55 to 0.87). A linear mixed model (predicting the CO 2 -values) showed an offset between arterial and transcutaneous measurements of TCM4 (-15.2mmHg, 95%CI: -16.3 to -14.2) and TCM5 (-19.1mmHg, -20.1 to -18.0). Differences between the two transcutaneous measurements were statistically significant. Conclusions Substantial differences were found between the two transcutaneous measurement systems, and between them and ABG. Transcutaneous CO 2 monitoring cannot replace arterial CO 2 -monitoring during apneic oxygenation. In clinical settings with rapidly changing CO 2 -values, arterial blood gas measurements are needed to reliably assess the CO 2 -partial pressure in blood. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03478774 ).

Emergency physicians are in danger of developing illnesses due to stress in their demanding work environment. Until today, scholars have not identified stressors or resilience factors that qualify to promote the preservation of emergency physicians’ well-being. Therefore, potential influencing variables such as patients’ diagnoses, the severity of diagnoses, as well as physicians’ work experience have to be considered. The present study aims at investigating emergency physicians in the Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS)’ autonomic nervous system activity during emergency operations in one shift with respect to patients’ diagnoses, severity of diagnoses, and physicians’ work experience. Measurement of HRV (employing the parameters RMSSD and LF/HF) for 59 EPs (age: M = 39.69, SD = 6.19) was performed during two complete air-rescue-days, the alarm and landing phase being investigated in particular. Besides patients’ diagnoses, the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics Score (NACA) was included as an indicator for severity. Diagnoses’ and NACA’s effect on HRV were examined using a linear mixed model. Both HRV parameters indicate a significant decrease of the parasympathetic nervous system as a function of the diagnoses. Furthermore, high NACA scores (≥ V) predicted a significantly lower HRV. In addition, a lower HRV/RMSSD with increasing work experience was observed as well as a positive association between physicians’ work experience and sympathetic activation (LF/HF). The present study showed that pediatric diagnoses as well as time-critical diagnoses are most stressful and have the highest impact on the physicians’ ANS. This knowledge allows the development of specific training to reduce stress.

BACKGROUND:Work-related stress may lead to mental and physical illnesses. Emergency physicians may be particularly vulnerable to developing such diseases due to their extreme emotional working environment.AIMS:The purpose of the study was to analyse the hormonal stress burden of emergency physicians in the airborne rescue service to create an empirical basis for developing appropriate measures against chronic stress in the rescue service.METHODS:Three salivary cortisol samples were collected after awakening in 15 min intervals-each on a flight rescue day, a clinic day and a free day-to calculate the extent of the hormonal stress load of the emergency physicians. A nested linear mixed-model analysis was used in 40 cases to investigate hormonal stress. Furthermore, professional years and gender were included in the calculations.RESULTS:The mixed model showed neither a main effect for measurement time nor for day but a significant interaction effect (P = 0.002). The cortisol level rises strongly on the flight rescue and the clinic day, while on the free day it shows a moderate increase. Professional years and gender also proved to be statistically significant for the cortisol level of emergency physicians (P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONS:The results show a significantly higher cortisol increase on working days compared with a free day, which indicates a stronger stress burden on working days of emergency physicians in the airborne rescue service. Future studies should examine the stress level of emergency physicians in more detail to prove whether the working conditions of emergency physicians need to be modified.

Aim Human factors are essential for high-quality resuscitation team collaboration and are, therefore, taught in international advanced life support courses, but their assessment differs widely. In Europe, the summative life support course assessment tests mainly adhere to guidelines but few human factors. This randomized controlled simulation trial investigated instructors’ and course participants’ perceptions of human factors assessment after two different summative assessments. Methods All 5th/6th-year medical students who attended 19 advanced life support courses according to the 2015 European Resuscitation Council guidelines during one study year were invited to participate. Each course was randomized to either: (1) Simulated team assessment (one instructor simulates a team, and the assessed person leads this “team” through a cardiac-arrest scenario test); (2) Real team assessment (4 students form a team, one of them is assessed as the team leader; team members are not assessed and act only on team leader’s commands). After the summative assessments, instructors, and students rated the tests’ ability to assess human factors using a visual analog scale (VAS, 0 = no agreement, 10 = total agreement). Results A total of 227 students participated in the 1-day Immediate Life Support courses, 196 students in the 2-day Advanced Life Support courses, additionally 54 instructors were included. Instructors judged all human factors significantly better in real team assessments; students rated leadership and situational awareness comparable between both assessments. Assessment pass rates were comparable between groups. Conclusion Summative assessment in real teams was perceived significantly better to assess human factors. These results might influence current summative assessment practices in advanced life support courses.

Background Airway management is a key skill in any helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS). Intubation is successful less often than in the hospital, and alternative forms of airway management are more often needed. Methods Retrospective observational cohort study in an anaesthesiologist-staffed HEMS in Switzerland. Patient charts were analysed for all calls to the scene ( n = 9,035) taking place between June 2016 and May 2017 (12 months). The primary outcome parameter was intubation success rate. Secondary parameters included the number of alternative techniques that eventually secured the airway, and comparison of patients with and without difficulties in airway management. Results A total of 365 patients receiving invasive ventilatory support were identified. Difficulties in airway management occurred in 26 patients (7.1%). Severe traumatic brain injury was the most common indication for out-of-hospital Intubation ( n = 130, 36%). Airway management was performed by 129 different Rega physicians and 47 different Rega paramedics. Paramedics were involved in out-of-hospital airway manoeuvres significantly more often than physicians: median 7 (IQR 4 to 9) versus 2 (IQR 1 to 4), p < 0.001. Conclusion Despite high overall success rates for endotracheal intubation in the physician-staffed service, individual physicians get only limited real-life experience with advanced airway management in the field. This highlights the importance of solid basic competence in a discipline such as anaesthesiology.

BACKGROUND Operator-directed nurse-administered (ODNA) sedation with propofol (PRO) is the preferred sedation technique for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in many centers. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate whether dexmedetomidine (DEX), an alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor agonist, is superior to propofol. METHODS We randomized 160 consecutive patients undergoing first AF ablation to ODNA sedation by DEX (DEX group) vs PRO (PRO group), according to a standardized protocol. Patients were unaware of treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was a composite of inefficient sedation, termination/change of sedation protocol or procedure abortion, hypercapnia (transcutaneous CO2 > 55 mm Hg), hypoxemia (SpO(2) < 90%) or intubation, prolonged hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 80 mm Hg), and sustained bradycardia necessitating cardiac pacing. Secondary endpoints were the components of the primary endpoint and patient satisfaction with procedural sedation, as assessed by a standardized questionnaire given the day after ablation. RESULTS The primary endpoint occurred in 15 DEX group and 25 PRO group patients (19% vs 31%; P = .068). Hypercapnia was significantly more frequent in PRO group patients (29% vs 10%; P = .003). There was no significant difference for the other components of the primary endpoint, and no procedure was aborted. Pa-tient satisfaction was significantly better among PRO group patients (visual analogue scale 0-100; median 100 in PRO group vs median 93 in DEX group; P <.001). CONCLUSION Efficacy of ODNA sedation with DEX was not different from that with PRO. Hypercapnia occurs less frequently with DEX, but patient satisfaction is better with PRO sedation. In selected patients, DEX may be used as an alternative to PRO for ODNA sedation during AF ablation.

Study objective: To investigate the variation of poorly ventilated lung units (i.e., silent spaces) in children undergoing procedural sedation in a day-hospital setting, until discharge home from the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). Design: Prospective, single-center, observational cohort trial. Setting: This study was conducted at the radiology department and in PACU at Bern University Hospital (Switzerland), a tertiary care hospital. Patients: We included 25 children (1-6 years, ASA I-III) scheduled for cerebral magnetic resonance imaging scan, spontaneously breathing under deep sedation. Children planned for tracheal intubation, supraglottic airway insertion, or with contraindication for propofol were excluded. Intervention: After intravenous or inhaled induction, deep sedation was performed with 10 mg/kg/h Propofol. All children received nasal oxygen 0.3 ml/kg/min. Measurements: The proportion of silent spaces and the global inhomogeneity index were determined at each of five procedural points, using electrical impedance tomography: before induction (T1); before (T2) and after (T3) magnetic resonance imaging; at the end of sedation before transport to the PACU (T4); and before hospital discharge (T5). Main results: The median [interquartile range (IQR)] proportion of silent spaces at the five analysis points were: T1, 5% [2%-14%]; T2, 10% [7%-14%]; T3, 12% [5%-23%]; T4, 12% [7%-24%]; and T5, 3% [2%-11%]. These defined significant changes in silent spaces over the course of sedation (p = 0.009), but no differences in silent spaces from before induction to before discharge from the PACU (T1 vs. T5; p = 0.29). Median [IQR] global inhomogeneity indices were 0.57 [0.55-0.58], 0.56 [0.53-0.59], 0.56 [0.54-0.59], 0.57 [0.54-0.60] and 0.56 [0.54-0.57], respectively (p = 0.93). None of the children reported anesthesia-related complications. Conclusion: Deep sedation results in significantly increased poorly ventilated lung units during sedation. However, this does not significantly affect ventilation homogeneity, which was fully resolved at discharge from the PACU.

Aim Effective team leadership is essential during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and is taught during international advanced life support (ALS) courses. This study compared the judgement of team leadership during summative assessments after those courses using different validated assessment tools while comparing two different summative assessment methods. Methods After ALS courses, twenty videos of simulated team assessments and 20 videos of real team assessments were evaluated and compared. Simulated team assessment used an instructor miming a whole team, whereas real team assessment used course participants as a team that acted on the team leader's commands. Three examiners individually evaluated each video on four different validated team leadership assessment tools and on the original European Resuscitation Council's (ERC) scenario test assessment form which does not assess leadership. The primary outcome was the average performance summary score between all three examiners for each assessment method. Results The average performance summary score for each of the four assessment tools was significantly higher for real team assessments compared to simulated team assessments (all p-values < 0.01). The summary score of the ERC's scenario test assessment form was comparable between both assessment methods (p = 0.569), meaning that participants of both assessments performed equally. Conclusion Team leadership performance is rated significantly higher in real team summative assessments after ALS courses compared to simulated team assessments by four leadership assessment tools but not by the standard ERC's scenario test assessment form. These results suggest that summative assessments in ALS courses should integrate real team assessments, and a new assessment tool including an assessment of leadership skills needs to be developed.