Despite advances in targeted and cellular therapies, outcomes for patients with Richter's transformation (RT) and transformed non-Hodgkin lymphoma (tNHL) remain dismal. In this report of a phase I multicenter investigator-sponsored study we describe the safety and efficacy of the combination of copanlisib, a selective, small molecule inhibitor of phosphoinositide- 3-kinase, and nivolumab, an antibody against programmed cell death protein 1. Twenty-seven adult patients with relapsed and/or refractory RT or tNHL were treated with escalating doses of copanlisib IV on days 1, 8, and 15 (dose level [DL] 1 - 45 mg, DL2 - 60 mg) combined with nivolumab 240 mg IV on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Three dose-limiting toxicities occurred in two patients treated at DL2, hence 45 mg was determined to be the maximum tolerated dose and utilized in the expansion cohort. The most common treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea and anemia. All patients went off protocol, predominantly because of progressive disease and adverse events (67% and 26% of patients, respectively). The overall response rate (ORR) was 46%. Patients with transformed follicular lymphoma had an ORR of 67% (2 complete responses), with median progression-free survival of 4.4 months (95% confidence interval: 1.4-12.2). Patients with RT had an ORR of 31% (2 complete responses) with a median progression-free survival of 2.0 months (95% confidence interval: 0.7- 4.9). Treatment resulted in downregulation of MYC and NFκB pathways in malignant B cells. Responding RT patients exhibited sustained activation of interferon-α and interferon-γ signaling pathways in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Overall, treatment with copanlisib and nivolumab demonstrated manageable toxicity and promising clinical efficacy in tNHL patients.

Introduction: Mycosis fungoides (MF) and the leukemic variant Sézary syndrome (SS), commonly referred to as cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL), are characterized by clonal expansion of malignant T cells in the skin within a background of chronic inflammation. Advanced stages have an unfavorable prognosis. The skin microenvironment plays an important role in the development and progression of MF and SS. We have shown that the malignant T cells escape immune surveillance via immune checkpoint signaling such as the PD-1/PD-L1 axis. In our phase I dose-escalating study anti-PD-L1 (durvalumab) & lenalidomide demonstrated a tolerable safety profile with significant clinical activity in refractory/advanced CTCL. We initiated the randomized Phase 2 portion to compare single agent durvalumab to durvalumab combined with lenalidomide in relapsed/advanced CTCL (NCT03011814). The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) using the global composite response (based on skin, blood, nodes, and viscera) according to consensus guidelines. Secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival, and toxicity. Relationships between gene expression profile, tumor-microenvironment, and antitumor activity were exploratory end points. Methods:Adult patients with histologically confirmed MF or SS, who had failed ≥2 systemic therapies were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to single agent durvalumab (1500 mg (day 1 of 28-day cycle) or durvalumab (same dose) & lenalidomide (10 mg for cycle 1, 15 mg for cycle 2, then 20 mg for subsequent cycles daily for 21 days of each 28-day cycle). The study used a “pick a winner” design based on ORR. Serial skin and blood samples were collected to assess the impact on the tumor microenvironment (TME) and anti-tumor activity. Results:A total of 23 patients were randomized and had the following characteristics (11 durvalumab vs 12 durvalumab/lenalidomide): median age 57 yrs (35-79) vs 63 yrs (32-88); stage IB, 2 (18%) vs 4 (33%); stage IIB, 4 (36%) vs 3 (25%); stage III/IV, 5 (45%) vs 5 (42%); MF, 8 (73%) vs 8 (67%); e-MF/SS, 4 (36%) vs 2 (17%); large cell transformation 3 (27%) vs 5 (42%). The median number of prior systemic treatments for both single and combo arm was 3. Global best ORR was 58% for durvalumab/ lenalidomide vs 36% for durvalumab alone.Median follow up time was 7.9 (range, 0.9-27.6) months. Analysis is ongoing. One patient died one month after discontinuation from study due to PD. No serious AEs were observed. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (shown below for combo arm) were more frequent in the durvalumab/lenalidomide arm vs durvalumab arm and included fatigue (n=9), diarrhea (n=4), decreased platelets (n=4), leg edema (n=3), constipation (n=3), hyperglycemia (n=3), anemia (n=3), and leukopenia & neutropenia (n=3). The majority of AEs with both treatment arms were mild to moderate in severity (grade I/II, 91%; grade III, 8 %). No grade IV event except 1 neutropenia on combo arm was observed. Median cycles of treatment were 4 (range, 1-12) and 5 (range 1-7) for single and combo arms.) Five pts remain on treatment on single agent durvalumab vs 3 pts on combo arm. Molecular profiling using CIBERSORT and single cell analysis revealed distinct changes of immune cell signatures and cellular signaling interactions within the TME that occurred in each treatment arm when compared to baseline. Conclusions: This randomized phase 2 trial of durvalumab (anti-PD-L1) +/- lenalidomide evaluating anti-tumor activity demonstrated superior clinical activity of combinatorial durvalumab/lenalidomide vs single-agent durvalumab in refractory/advanced CTCL. Responses were durable and ongoing, and treatment was well tolerated. Our correlative results from sequential skin biopsies demonstrated immune signatures for enhanced anti-tumor responses on skin biopsies at baseline may be predictive of response to checkpoint blockade and yield insights into mechanisms of therapeutic resistance.

PURPOSE:Approximately 50% of patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) will relapse post-autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), and the role of salvage therapy is not well defined. We examined radiation therapy (RT) as salvage treatment in this patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A retrospective review of patients with DLBCL who had an ASCT during 2004 to 2016 and subsequently relapsed was performed. Clinical and pathologic characteristics were collected, including detailed information regarding post-ASCT treatment. Response rates were tabulated and survival analysis was performed, stratified by salvage modality. RESULTS:A total of 165 patients with R/R DLBCL who relapsed after ASCT were identified; 91 of these patients received salvage chemotherapy as their first line of relapse therapy, and 14 received salvage radiation. Median salvage RT dose was 36 Gy (range, 24-50). The objective response rate with salvage chemotherapy and RT was 53.0% and 78.5%, respectively (P = 0.07), and the complete response rate was 31.3% and 57.1%, respectively (P = 0.06). Median follow-up among living patients was 48.9 months (range, 4.8-136.17). Among patients with one site of relapse post-ASCT, median overall survival in patients who received salvage RT was significantly improved (P = 0.008) relative to chemotherapy (not reached [95% confidence interval {CI}, 8.4-not reached] versus 10.0 months [95% CI, 5.3-17.8]). Median progression-free survival in patients who received salvage RT was not significantly different (P = 0.16) relative to chemotherapy (8.4 months [95% CI, 2.5-47.7] versus 3.9 months [95% CI, 2.4-8.5]). CONCLUSIONS:Patients who received RT as first salvage therapy post-ASCT, particularly with localized disease, had favorable oncologic outcomes. Future studies are needed to understand which patients with R/R DLBCL who relapse after ASCT may benefit from early salvage RT versus chemotherapy.

Positron emission tomography (PET)‐based measures of baseline total‐body tumor burden may improve risk stratification in intermediate‐risk Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).

Introduction: Transformed nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (tNLPHL) with a typical diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) pattern is rare and not well studied by genomic analysis. We employed next generation sequencing and copy number analysis (CNA) to examine the pathogenesis of these tumors. Methods: We identified 19 cases of tNLPHL with DLBCL morphology and sheet-like growth from three institutions. NLPHL preceded transformation in 5 patients and was concurrent with transformation in 11. All cases of tNLPHL were sequenced using a targeted sequencing panel of 356 genes that included commonly mutated genes associated with lymphoma. We had 8 cases with matched germline DNA. We also performed CNA using Oncoscan on 18 cases of tNLPHL. Library preparation with paired end 100 bp sequencing and 6-10 million reads/case was performed on an Illumina HiSeq 2500. Fisher's exact test was used to compare the role of mutations in tNLPHL to three large series of de novo DLBCL. Results: The CNA showed frequent gains in REL and loss of CDKN2A. Mutation analysis showed frequent mutations of genes associated with the PI3K pathway such as SGK1 (26%), ZFP36L1 (16%), PIK3R1 (11%), and IL7R (11%), the NF-kB pathway such as CARD11 (21%), JUNB (21%), BCL10 (11%), NFKBIA (11%), TNFAIP3 (11%), histone/DNA modification such as KMT2D (26%), EP300 (21%), TET2 (11%), TET3 (11%), and the NOTCH pathway such as NOTCH2 (16%), NOTCH1 (1 case), CTBP2 (11%). Mutations in genes involved in immune surveillance and TP53 abnormalities were infrequent. Compared to de novo DLBCL, mutations in IL7R (10.5% vs 0.6%, p=0.03), JUNB (21% vs 4.2%, p=0.01), and SMARCAL1 (11% vs 0%, p=0.01) were significantly higher in tNLPHL than in germinal center B-cell (GCB) subtype of DLBCL. Conclusion: The mutational spectrum of tNLPHL resembles the DLBCL Cluster 4 of Chapuy et al (Nat Med, 2018), which were primarily GCB-DLBCL with frequent mutations in the PI3K pathway (SGK1), NF-kB pathway (CARD11, JUNB), and histone modification. The mutational spectrum is also distinctive in having frequent mutations that are not often seen together in DLBCL, such as TET2, JUNB and NOTCH2. Distinct from transformed follicular lymphoma, TP53 abnormalities and mutations affecting immune surveillance are uncommonly observed. This study provides new insights into the biology of tNLPHL and may highlight potential targets for therapy in the future. Disclosures Herrera: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding.

BACKGROUND: The Children's Oncology Group AHOD0431 study evaluated a response-directed treatment paradigm in which minimal initial chemotherapy and low-dose radiation was received only by patients who did not achieve a complete remission, and a chemotherapy/low-dose radiation salvage regimen was received by those who had a protocol-defined, low-risk recurrence. METHODS: Patients younger than 21 years who had stage IA or IIA nonbulky disease were eligible. The treatment strategy was evaluated by determining the proportion that received minimal chemotherapy alone, the proportion that had a first or second remission without the receipt of high-dose chemotherapy/stem cell rescue or higher dose involved-field radiation therapy (>21 grays), and overall survival. RESULTS: In total, 278 patients were eligible. At 4 years, 49.0% had received minimal chemotherapy and no radiation, 88.8% were in remission without receiving high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue or >21 grays of involved-field radiation therapy, and the overall survival rate was 99.6%. Patients who had mixed cellularity histology had a 4-year event-free survival (EFS) rate of 95.2%, which was significantly better than the 75.8% EFS for those who had nodular sclerosis histology (P=.008). A red blood cell sedimentation rate <= 20 mm/hour and a negative fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography scan after 1 cycle of chemotherapy (PET1) were associated with a favorable EFS outcome. The study was closed early when the receipt of radiation therapy exceeded the predefined monitoring boundary. CONCLUSIONS: This limited chemotherapy response-based approach was successful in patients who had a negative PET1 result, had MC histology, or had a low red blood cell sedimentation rate. In this treatment paradigm, evaluation of increased chemotherapy intensity or the integration of active new agents is indicated for patients who have nodular sclerosis histology with a high ESR or who have a positive PET1 result. (C) 2018 American Cancer Society.

Purpose We evaluated the outcome of children (<15 years) versus that of adolescents and young adults (AYA; 15- 21 years) treated for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in two Pediatric Oncology Group/Children's Oncology Group clinical trials, P9425 and P9426, that used dose-dense, response-based chemotherapy and reduced dose radiotherapy. Patients and methods Subjects 21 years or younger with HL were eligible for these studies. Subjects with low-risk (stages IA, IIA, and IIIA1) without large mediastinal adenopathy biopsy-proven HL, eligible for P9426, were treated with two to four 28-day cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, and etoposide (ABVE) chemotherapy and 25.5 Gy of involved field radiotherapy. Subjects with intermediate-risk (stages IB, IIA, IIIA1 with large mediastinal adenopathy, and IIIA2) and high-risk (stages IIB, IIIB, and IV) biopsy-proven HL, eligible for P9425, were treated with three to five 21-day cycles of ABVE plus prednisone and cyclophosphamide (ABVE-PC) chemotherapy and 21 Gy of involved region radiotherapy. We compared the 5-year event-free survival (EFS), based on Kaplan-Meier product-limit method, of children versus that of AYA. Results Four hundred seventy-one subjects were enrolled on P9425 and P9426 combined. Of these subjects, 203 were AYA, 104 with intermediate and high-risk HL, and 99 with low-risk HL. The 5-year EFS of children did not significantly differ from that of AYA (85.9 vs. 87.1%) with a median follow up of 7.7 years (P = 0.51). Conclusion Given the equivalent and excellent results of therapy, HL represents an opportunity for adult and pediatric cancer treatment collaborative groups to jointly design clinical trials targeted to AYA. These trials should focus on both treatment efficacy and the quality of life of AYA while receiving chemotherapy and in reduction of long-term side effects in the survivorship years.

Assay of cell-free DNA in blood offers an approach to assessment of tumor DNA. We sought to determine whether Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA in cell-free blood is also a good surrogate for the presence of tumor DNA in children with Hodgkin lymphoma, as it is in adults, and whether it correlates with pediatric outcomes. Pediatric patients enrolled in a Children's Oncology Group trial (AHOD0031) were studied at baseline and at 8 days after the initiation of treatment. At baseline, EBV DNA in cell-free blood correlated with the presence of EBV in tumor, and EBV DNA 8 days after the initiation of therapy predicted inferior event-free survival. EBV DNA in cell-free blood warrants further investigation as a marker of inadequate tumor response in Hodgkin lymphoma. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00025259.

Histologic prognostic factors have been described for nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL). This study examines histologic and immunophenotypic variants in a clinical trial for pediatric NLPHL.

PURPOSE Children's Oncology Group study AHOD03P1 was designed to determine whether excellent outcomes can be maintained for patients with low-risk, pediatric lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (LPHL) with a strategy of resection alone or minimal chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with stage IA LPHL in a single node that was completely resected were observed without further therapy; recurrences were treated with three cycles of doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone/cyclophosphamide (AV-PC). Patients with unresected stage IA or stage IIA LPHL were treated with three cycles of AV-PC. Patients with less than a complete response (CR) to AV-PC received 21-Gy involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT). RESULTS A total of 183 eligible patients were enrolled; 178 were evaluable. Of these, 52 patients underwent complete resection of a single node. There were 13 relapses at a median of 11.5 months; 5-year event-free survival (EFS) was 77% (range, 62% to 87%). A total of 135 patients received AV-PC; 126 were treated at diagnosis and nine at relapse after surgery alone. Eleven patients receiving AV-PC had less than CR and received IFRT. Fourteen first events occurred among 135 patients (12 relapses and two second malignancies). Two relapses occurred in patients who had received IFRT. Five-year EFS was 88.8% (95% CI, 81.8% to 93.2%). Five-year EFS for the entire cohort was 85.5% (95% CI, 79.2% to 90.1%); overall survival was 100%. CONCLUSION Some 75% of highly selected pediatric patients with LPHL may be spared chemotherapy after surgical resection alone. Pediatric LPHL has excellent EFS with chemotherapy that is less intensive than standard regimens; > 90% of patients can avoid radiation therapy. The salvage rate for the few relapses is high, with 100% survival overall.

Background: Early response to initial chemotherapy in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) measured by computed tomography (CT) and/or positron emission tomography (PET) after two to three cycles of chemotherapy may inform therapeutic decisions. Risk stratification at diagnosis could, however, allow earlier and potentially more efficacious treatment modifications.Patients and Methods: We developed a predictive model for event-free survival (EFS) in pediatric/adolescent HL using clinical data known at diagnosis from 1103 intermediate-risk HL patients treated on Children's Oncology Group protocol AHOD0031 with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone, cyclophosphamide (ABVE-PC) chemotherapy and radiation. Independent predictors of EFS were identified and used to develop and validate a prognostic score (Childhood Hodgkin International Prognostic Score [CHIPS]). A training cohort was randomly selected to include approximately half of the overall cohort, with the remainder forming the validation cohort.Results: Stage 4 disease, large mediastinal mass, albumin (<3.5), and fever were independent predictors of EFS that were each assigned one point in the CHIPS. Four-year EFS was 93.1% for patients with CHIPS = 0, 88.5% for patients with CHIPS = 1, 77.6% for patients with CHIPS = 2, and 69.2% for patients with CHIPS = 3.Conclusions: CHIPS was highly predictive of EFS, identifying a subset (with CHIPS 2 or 3) that comprises 27% of intermediate-risk patients who have a 4-year EFS of <80% and who may benefit from early therapeutic augmentation. Furthermore, CHIPS identified higher risk patients who were not identified by early PET or CT response. CHIPS is a robust and inexpensive approach to predicting risk in patients with intermediate-risk HL that may improve ability to tailor therapy to risk factors known at diagnosis.

PURPOSE:To determine the oncologic efficacy, cardioprotective effectiveness, and safety of dexrazoxane added to chemotherapy that included a cumulative doxorubicin dose of 360 mg/m(2) to treat children and adolescents with newly diagnosed T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) or lymphoblastic non-Hodgkin lymphoma (L-NHL).PATIENTS AND METHODS:Patients were treated on Pediatric Oncology Group Protocol POG 9404, which included random assignment to treatment with or without dexrazoxane given as a bolus infusion immediately before every dose of doxorubicin. Cardiac effects were assessed by echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular function and structure.RESULTS:Of 573 enrolled patients, 537 were eligible, evaluable, and randomly assigned to an arm with or without dexrazoxane. The 5-year event-free survival (with standard error) did not differ between groups: 77.2% (2.7%) for the dexrazoxane group versus 76.0% (2.7%) for the doxorubicin-only group (P = .9). The frequencies of severe grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity, infection, CNS events, and toxic deaths were similar in both groups (P ranged from .26 to .64). Of 11 second malignancies, eight occurred in patients who received dexrazoxane (P = .17). The mean left ventricular fractional shortening, wall thickness, and thickness-to-dimension ratio z scores measured 3 years after diagnosis were worse in the doxorubicin-alone group (n = 55 per group; P ≤ .01 for all comparisons). Mean fractional shortening z scores measured 3.5 to 6.4 years after diagnosis remained diminished and were lower in the 21 patients who received doxorubicin alone than in the 31 patients who received dexrazoxane (-2.03 v -0.24; P ≤ .001).CONCLUSION:Dexrazoxane was cardioprotective and did not compromise antitumor efficacy, did not increase the frequencies of toxicities, and was not associated with a significant increase in second malignancies with this doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy regimen. We recommend dexrazoxane as a cardioprotectant for children and adolescents who have malignancies treated with anthracyclines.

BackgroundWe assessed the safety and efficacy of ifosfamide and vinorelbine (IV) as a less toxic and effective reinduction regimen for pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma.ProcedureThis multi‐center Children's Oncology Group phase II pilot study enrolled patients <30 years of age with biopsy‐proven Hodgkin Lymphoma in relapse or refractory disease after front‐line therapy. Treatment consisted of ifosfamide 3,000 mg/m2 intravenous infusion over 24 hr on Days 1–4 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2/dose intravenous push on Days 1 and 5 of each 21 day cycle with cytokine support. The study endpoints included estimation of key toxicities (cardiac, hepatic, or renal toxicity or toxic death), the rate of successful peripheral stem cell harvesting, and response after two cycles of therapy.ResultsSixty‐six patients received a median of two cycles of IV. Sixty‐four of 66 were heavily pretreated, 4 had refractory disease, 55% were male and 79% had nodular sclerosis HL. The primary toxicities were hematologic. Harvested peripheral stem cells were sufficient for autologous transplantation in 46 of 54 patients for whom stem cell collection was attempted. The overall response rate (72%; 95% CI 59–83%) permitted the majority of patients to undergo subsequent stem cell transplantation.ConclusionsIV is a safe and effective re‐induction regimen for salvage of pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma with an excellent response rate and success of post chemotherapy stem cell harvest. It avoids the use of etoposide, an agent associated with secondary malignancy after stem cell transplantation. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015;62:60–64. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

PURPOSE: The AHOD0831 study tested a response-based treatment approach for pediatric patients with very high risk Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Central response review following 2 cycles of dose intensive chemotherapy by FDG-PET was utilized to assign consolidation chemotherapy and risk-adapted radiotherapy. The primary outcome was second event-free survival (2nd EFS), defined as freedom from second relapse or malignancy. Because many patients with relapsed HL can be successfully cured with retrieval therapy, 2nd EFS more accurately reflects long-term overall survival (OS). AHOD0831 was designed to test whether this treatment protocol will maintain 4-year 2nd EFS ≥95%.

Purpose: A phase 3 trial assessing response-based therapy in intermediate-risk Hodgkin lymphoma mandated real-time central review of involved field radiation therapy (IFRT) and imaging records by a centralized review center to maximize protocol compliance. We report the impact of centralized radiation therapy review on protocol compliance.Methods and Materials: Review of simulation films, port films, and dosimetry records was required before and after treatment. Records were reviewed by study-affiliated or review center-affiliated radiation oncologists. A deviation of 6% to 10% from protocol-specified dose was scored as "minor"; a deviation of >10% was "major." A volume deviation was scored as "minor" if margins were less than specified or "major" if fields transected disease-bearing areas. Interventional review and final compliance review scores were assigned to each radiation therapy case and compared.Results: Of 1712 patients enrolled, 1173 underwent IFRT at 256 institutions in 7 countries. An interventional review was performed in 88% of patients and a final review in 98%. Overall, minor and major deviations were found in 12% and 6% of patients, respectively. Among the cases for which >= 1 pre-IFRT modification was requested by the Quality Assurance Review Center and subsequently made by the treating institution, 100% were made compliant on final review. By contrast, among the cases for which >= 1 modification was requested but not made by the treating institution, 10% were deemed compliant on final review.Conclusions: In a large trial with complex treatment pathways and heterogeneous radiation therapy fields, central review was performed in a large percentage of cases before IFRT and identified frequent potential deviations in a timely manner. When suggested modifications were performed by the institutions, deviations were almost eliminated. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

A Children's Oncology Group clinical trial aimed to determine if bortezomib (B) increased the efficacy of ifosfamide and vinorelbine (IV) in paediatric Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). This study enrolled 26 relapsed HL patients (<30 years) treated with two to four cycles of IVB. The primary endpoint was anatomic complete response (CR) after two cycles. Secondary endpoints included overall response (OR: CR + partial response) at study completion compared to historical controls [72%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 59-83%]. Although few patients achieved the primary objective, OR with IVB improved to 83% (95% CI: 61-95%; p = 0.32). Although not statistically different, results suggest IVB may be a promising combination.

PURPOSE:The Children's Oncology Group study AHOD0031, a randomized phase III study, was designed to evaluate the role of early chemotherapy response in tailoring subsequent therapy in pediatric intermediate-risk Hodgkin lymphoma. To avoid treatment-associated risks that compromise long-term health and to maintain high cure rates, dose-intensive chemotherapy with limited cumulative doses was used.PATIENTS AND METHODS:Patients received two cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone (ABVE-PC) followed by response evaluation. Rapid early responders (RERs) received two additional ABVE-PC cycles, followed by complete response (CR) evaluation. RERs with CR were randomly assigned to involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) or no additional therapy; RERs with less than CR were nonrandomly assigned to IFRT. Slow early responders (SERs) were randomly assigned to receive two additional ABVE-PC cycles with or without two cycles of dexamethasone, etoposide, cisplatin, and cytarabine (DECA). All SERs were assigned to receive IFRT.RESULTS:Among 1,712 eligible patients, 4-year event-free survival (EFS) was 85.0%: 86.9% for RERs and 77.4% for SERs (P < .001). Four-year overall survival was 97.8%: 98.5% for RERs and 95.3% for SERs (P < .001). Four-year EFS was 87.9% versus 84.3% (P = .11) for RERs with CR who were randomly assigned to IFRT versus no IFRT, and 86.7% versus 87.3% (P = .87) for RERs with positron emission tomography (PET) -negative results at response assessment. Four-year EFS was 79.3% versus 75.2% (P = .11) for SERs who were randomly assigned to DECA versus no DECA, and 70.7% versus 54.6% (P = .05) for SERs with PET-positive results at response assessment.CONCLUSION:This trial demonstrated that early response assessment supported therapeutic titration (omitting radiotherapy in RERs with CR; augmenting chemotherapy in SERs with PET-positive disease). Strategies directed toward improved response assessment and risk stratification may enhance tailoring of treatment to patient characteristics and response.

PURPOSE:Platinum-based therapy is the mainstay for management of high-risk neuroblastoma. Prevalence of platinum-related ototoxicity has ranged from 13% to 95% in previous reports; variability is attributable to small samples and disparate grading scales. There is no consensus regarding optimal ototoxicity grading. Furthermore, prevalence and predictors of hearing loss in a large uniformly treated high-risk neuroblastoma population are unknown. We address these gaps in our study.PATIENTS AND METHODS:Audiologic testing was completed after administration of cisplatin alone (< 400 mg/m(2); exposure one) or after cisplatin (400 mg/m(2)) plus carboplatin (1,700 mg/m(2); exposure two). Hearing loss was graded using four scales (American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; Brock; Chang; and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3 [CTCAEv3]).RESULTS:Of 489 eligible patients, 333 had evaluable audiologic data. Median age at diagnosis was 3.3 years. Prevalence of severe hearing loss differed by scale. For those in the exposure-one group, prevalence ranged from 8% per Brock to 47% per CTCAEv3 (Brock v CTCAEv3 and Chang, P < .01; CTCAEv3 v Chang, P = .16); for those in the exposure-two group, prevalence ranged from 30% per Brock to 71% per CTCAEv3 (all pair-wise comparisons, P < .01). In patients requiring hearing aids, hearing loss was graded as severe in 49% (Brock), 91% (Chang), and 100% (CTCAEv3). Risk factors for severe hearing loss included exposure to cisplatin and carboplatin compared with cisplatin alone and hospitalization for infection.CONCLUSION:Severe hearing loss is prevalent among children with high-risk neuroblastoma. Exposure to cisplatin combined with myeloablative carboplatin significantly increases risk. The Brock scale underestimates severe hearing loss and should be used with caution in this setting.

10024 Background: DRZ use as a cardioprotectant in pediatric oncology has been limited by concerns regarding its efficacy and possible induction of second cancers, both of which may compromise overall long-term survival. Methods: COG protocols P9404 (T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma, n=537), P9425 (advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma, n=216), and P9426 (low/intermediate stage Hodgkin, n=255) were conducted between 1996 and 2001. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with or without DRZ (10:1 DRZ:doxorubicin alone given as IV bolus before each doxorubicin dose); cumulative protocol-specified doxorubicin dose: 100-360 mg/m2. Data from all 3 trials were aggregated to examine overall relapse rates, and also linked with the US National Death Index to determine overall and cause-specific mortality by DRZ status (intent-to-treat). The combined sample had 80% power to detect differences in mortality and relapse rates of 5-7% and 6-8%, respectively. Results: Among 1,008 patients (DRZ+, n=507) with a median follow-up of 8.3 years (range 0-16.7), 132 died (DRZ+ n=67). With similar duration of follow-up by DRZ status, DRZ did not affect overall mortality (DRZ+, 12.8% vs. DRZ-, 12.2% at 10 years; HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.72-1.43) or relapse (10-year cumulative incidence: DRZ+, 15.6% vs. DRZ-, 18.8%; HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.60-1.10). Findings were similar when each protocol was examined separately. DRZ also was not associated with differential causes of death, with the original cancer accounting for 75.8% of all deaths (DRZ+/-, n=48/52; HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.61-1.34), followed by second cancers (DRZ+/-, n=10/9; HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.44-2.67), toxicity (DRZ+/-, n=7/3; HR 2.30, 95% CI 0.60-8.91), and other/unknown causes (DRZ+/-, n=2/1). There was no detectable difference in deaths due to acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplasia (DRZ+/-, n=6/5) or with a cardiovascular event as a contributing cause (DRZ+/-, n=4/2). Conclusions: DRZ was not associated with a differential risk of mortality or relapse among randomized pediatric leukemia and lymphoma patients. Whether DRZ reduced cardiotoxicity is the focus of an ongoing prospective study. Clinical trial information: NCT01230983, NCT00005578, NCT00002827.