Background: The OPERA trial has shown that a contact X-ray brachytherapy 50 kV (CXB) boost with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) can increase organ preservation (OP) rate for early rectal adenocarcinoma (ADK) of low- mid rectum. We report the results after 5 years of follow-up. Patients and methods: OPERA was a multicentre, phase III trial that included operable patients (pts), with cT2-cT3b low-mid rectal ADK, tumours <5 cm, cN0 or cN1 <8 mm. All pts received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT): 45 Gy in 25 fractions with concurrent capecitabine. Pts were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a boost of EBRT in group A (9 Gy/5 fractions) or a boost with CXB (90 Gy/3 fractions) in group B. The primary end point was OP rate. Results: Out of 148 patients randomised, 141 were eligible. Between week 14-24, a clinical complete (or near) response was observed in 44 pts in group A (64%) versus 66 in group B (92%); P < 0.001. The 3-year OP rate was 59% in group A versus 81% in group B (P = 0.003). After update the median follow-up was 61.1 months [56.8-64.5]. The 5-year local regrowth was 39% in group A and 17% in group B (P = 0.1). The difference in OP was still highly significant between both groups: A 56% versus B 79% (P = 0.004). The difference was more significant if tumours <3 cm, with an OP rate of 93% in group B compared to 54% in group A. Of the 28 local regrowths, 3 occurred after 3 years of follow-up. Rectal bleeding (grade 1-2), which was the most prevalent toxicity during follow-up, disappeared most of the time after three years. Bowel function was not worsened by the CXB boost. Conclusion: The OPERA trial was the first trial to demonstrate that CXB dose escalation was increasing the OP rate with good bowel function at 3 years. At 5 years, these results are sustained, especially in small early-stage tumours. The occurrence of some local regrowth after 3 years necessitates close surveillance of these pts during the 5-year period.

BACKGROUND:Efficacy of 2nd line treatment in advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma remains limited with no identified strong predictor of treatment efficacy. We evaluated the prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in predicting the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) plus chemotherapy in the randomized PRODIGE 59-FFCD 1707-DURIGAST trial. METHODS:ctDNA was evaluated before treatment (baseline) and at 4 weeks (before the third cycle of treatment, C3) using droplet-digital PCR assays based on the detection of CpG methylation. RESULTS:Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were shorter in patients with a high (>1.1 ng/mL) versus low (<1.1 ng/mL) ctDNA concentration at baseline (2.3 vs. 5.8 months; HR = 2.19; 95% CI, 1.09-4.41; p = 0.03 and 4.5 vs. 12.9 months; HR = 2.73; 95% CI, 1.29-5.75; p < 0.01), respectively, after adjustment for identified prognostic variables. Patients with a ctDNA decrease ≤75% between baseline and C3 versus a ctDNA decrease >75% had a worse objective response rate (p = 0.007), shorter PFS (2.2 vs. 7.4 months, HR = 1.90; 95% CI, 1.03-3.51; p = 0.04) and OS (6.6 vs 16.0 months; HR = 2.18; 95% CI, 1.09-4.37; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS:An early decrease in ctDNA concentration is a strong predictor of the therapeutic efficacy of ICI plus chemotherapy in advanced gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Clinical Trial Information NCT03959293 (DURIGAST).

BACKGROUND:In RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), preliminary data have suggested that circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may select patients for anti-EGFR rechallenge therapy. METHODS:RASINTRO is a prospective nonrandomized study evaluating anti-EGFR rechallenge strategy in third and later line treatment in RAS/BRAF WT mCRC. Liquid biopsies for ctDNA analysis were collected before the first (C1) and second (C2) cycles of anti-EGFR rechallenge therapy. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS) according to RAS/BRAF mutational status on ctDNA at C1. RESULTS:Among 74 patients screened between November 2017 and March 2020, 62 were enrolled: median age, 66.1 years; median number of previous lines of therapy, 3; panitumumab or cetuximab rechallenge alone (66.2%) or with chemotherapy (33.8%); ctDNA RAS/BRAF status at C1, 42 WT (67.7%) and 20 mutated (32.3%). Median PFS (3.3 vs 1.9 months: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.43; P <.01) and overall survival (OS) (7.9 vs 4.9 months; HR = 0.46; P =.01) were significantly longer for patients with ctDNA RAS/BRAF WT vs mutated at C1. Among the 32 patients with ctDNA RAS/BRAF WT at C1 and available blood samples at C2, those who have experienced an early decrease of >50% in ctDNA concentration (n = 15) had a significantly longer median PFS (4.2 vs 2.8 months; HR = 0.39; P =.01) and OS (10.2 vs 4.2 months; HR = 0.39; P =.02). CONCLUSION:This study showed that anti-EGFR rechallenge therapy in refractory disease is more effective in patients with RAS/BRAF WT on ctDNA, and in those who experienced an early decrease of >50% in ctDNA concentration. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03259009.

BACKGROUND:The aim of this post hoc study was to assess the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT quantitative parameters recorded before and after treatment for anal canal neoplasm for the disease free survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Consecutive, previously untreated patients with histologically proved anal cancer, with 18F-FDG PET/CT pre- and 2 months post treatment were included. The following criteria were analyzed: baseline primary tumor lesion glycolysis (TLG), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), standardized tumor volume (SUV) max and mean, SUV normalized by lean body mass (SUL) max, mean and peak, variations between pre- and post-treatment examinations for SUVmax (Delta SUVmax), TLG (Delta TLG), MTV (Delta MTV), as well as post-treatment SULpeak and SUVmax for the primary tumor, and baseline sum of lesions TLG and MTV. RESULTS:About 78 consecutive patients were included in this study. Median follow-up was 49 months. Baseline TLG, SUVmax, SULpeak, SULmax, sum of lesions for TLG and MTV, Delta SUVmax, and post-therapeutic SULpeak and SUVmax for the primary tumor, were statistically significant for disease free survival. CONCLUSION:Pretherapeutic 18F-FDG PET/CT has a statistically significant prognostic value. The wide variability of results published in literature compels us to specifically explore the interest of uptake variations between pre- and post-treatment examinations.

Background: The standard of care for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) results in an excellent local disease control but the metastasis rates remain high. PRODIGE 23 demonstrated improved disease-free survival (DFS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) with total neoadjuvant therapy versus standard of care in this population. Long-term analysis of overall survival (OS) is reported here. Patients and methods: The study design, participants, and primary endpoint DFS have been reported for this multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial investigating the neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFIRINOX (6 cycles) followed by chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (6 cycles), versus chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (12 cycles) in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma under peritoneal reflection fl ection on magnetic resonance imaging, and staged cT3/T4. Key secondary endpoints included OS, MFS, and local and metastatic recurrence rate. Results: With a median follow-up of 82.2 months, the 7-year DFS was 67.6% [95% confidence fi dence interval (CI) 60.7% to 73.9%] and 62.5% (95% CI 55.6% to 68.6%) [restricted mean survival time (RMST) difference 5.73 months, 95% CI 0.05-11.41 months, P = 0.048] in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the standard-of-care groups, respectively. The 7-year MFS was 79.2% (95% CI 73.0% to 84.4%) in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 72.3% (95% CI 65.8% to 77.8%) in the standard-of-care group (RMST difference 6.1 months, 95% CI 0.93-11.37 months, P = 0.021). The 7-year OS was 81.9% (95% CI 75.8% to 86.6%) in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 76.1% (95% CI 69.7% to 81.2%) in the standard-of-care group (RMST difference 4.37 months, 95% CI 0.35-8.38 months, P = 0.033). The safety profile fi le remained unchanged since the previous analysis. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFIRINOX followed by chemoradiotherapy improved OS, confirmed fi rmed long-term DFS and MFS benefits fi ts in LARC patients, and should be considered as one of the best options of care for these patients.

330 Background: Tislelizumab (TIS), an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 monoclonal antibody, plus chemo, demonstrated significant overall survival (OS) benefit vs placebo (PBO) plus chemo (15.0 vs 12.9 months [mo], hazard ratio [HR]=0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70, 0.92, P=0.0011) as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC) in the randomized, double-blind, global, phase 3 RATIONALE-305 study (NCT03777657). Here we present results from the European/North American (Eu/NA) pts subgroup analysis. Methods: This double-blind, global, phase 3 study evaluated adult pts with previously untreated, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, locally advanced unresectable, or metastatic GC/GEJC, regardless of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status. Eligible pts were randomized (1:1) to receive TIS 200 mg or PBO intravenously once every 3 weeks plus investigator chosen chemo (5-fluorouracil + cisplatin or capecitabine + oxaliplatin). The primary endpoint was OS in the PD-L1+ (patients with tumor area positivity score ≥5%) and intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis sets. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), and safety. Results: Of 997 pts enrolled, 249 (25.0%) were from Eu/NA (TIS plus chemo arm, n=125; PBO plus chemo arm, n=124). In the Eu/NA pts subgroup, after a minimum follow-up of 26.6 mo at final analysis, TIS plus chemo resulted in OS improvements vs PBO plus chemo in the PD-L1+ (HR=0.75, [95% CI: 0.52, 1.07]; 24 mo rate 27.6% vs 12.5%) and ITT analysis sets (HR=0.71, [95% CI: 0.54, 0.94]; 24 mo rate 27.6% vs 13.6%). TIS plus chemo resulted in favorable PFS vs PBO plus chemo (HR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.63, 1.11), numerically higher ORR (36.0% vs 31.5%), and longer DoR (median 7.5 mo [95% CI: 4.4, 12.0] vs 5.0 mo [95% CI: 3.9, 6.7]). Sixty (48.8%) pts in the TIS plus chemo arm and 61 (49.2%) pts in the PBO plus chemo arm experienced grade ≥3 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TRAEs). Sixteen (13.0%) and seven (5.6%) pts discontinued treatment due to TRAEs in the TIS plus chemo and PBO plus chemo arms, respectively. Deaths due to TRAEs occurred in two (1.6%) pts in the TIS plus chemo arm and one (0.8%) pt in the PBO plus chemo arm. Conclusions: TIS plus chemo showed OS benefit compared with PBO plus chemo and a manageable safety profile in pts in the Eu/NA subgroup with previously untreated, HER2-negative, locally advanced unresectable, or metastatic GC/GEJC. These findings are consistent with the published results in the overall study population. Clinical trial information: NCT03777657 .

PURPOSE:The influence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection on clinical outcomes in patients receiving (chemo)radiation therapy (RT) for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is debated. The objective of this study was to compare efficacy and safety according to HIV status in patients with SCCA treated with C/RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS:Between January 2015 and April 2020, 488 patients with a known HIV status (17.6% HIV+) were treated with radiation therapy for SCCA and included in the FFCD-ANABASE multicentric prospective cohort. Clinical outcomes including overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival, colostomy-free survival, response rate at 4 to 6 months, cancer-specific survival, relapse-free survival, and severe acute and late toxicity were compared between HIV+ and HIV- patients. RESULTS:The median follow-up was 35.8 months. HIV+ patients were younger (P < .01) and predominantly male (P < .01). Intensity modulated radiation therapy was performed in 80.7% of patients, and 80.9% received concurrent chemotherapy. A higher proportion of HIV+ patients received induction chemotherapy compared with HIV- patients. No statistically significant difference in overall treatment time or severe acute and late toxicities was found between HIV+ and HIV- patients. In univariate analyses, OS (HR = 2.1 [CI 95% 1.2;3.5], P = .007), locoregional recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.7 [1.1;2.7], P = .02), and colostomy-free survival (HR = 1.7 [1.1;2.6], P = .01) were significantly shorter in HIV+ patients than in HIV- patients. Response rate, cancer-specific survival, and relapse-free survival were not significantly different. The recurrence site was significantly different according to HIV status. In the multivariate analysis, prognostic factors for OS were a World Health Organization performance status of ≥1 for the whole population, as well as HIV+ status for the subgroup of women. CONCLUSIONS:HIV+ patients treated with chemo-RT for SCCA have poorer clinical outcomes, especially women. No difference was found in toxicity according to HIV status with intensity modulated radiation therapy technique.

Background After surgical resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), patients are predominantly treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, commonly consisting of gemcitabine-based regimens or the modified FOLFIRINOX regimen (mFFX). While mFFX has been shown to be more effective than gemcitabine-based regimens, it is also associated with higher toxicity. Current treatment decisions are based on patient performance status rather than on the molecular characteristics of the tumor. To address this gap, the goal of this study was to develop drug-specific transcriptomic signatures for personalized chemotherapy treatment. Patients and Methods We used PDAC datasets from preclinical models, encompassing chemotherapy response profiles for the mFFX-regimen components. From them we identified specific gene transcripts associated with chemotherapy response. Three transcriptomic AI-signatures were obtained by combining Independent Component Analysis, Least Absolute Shrinkage and the Selection Operator-Random Forest approach. We integrated a previously developed gemcitabine signature with three newly developed ones. The machine learning strategy employed to enhance these signatures incorporates transcriptomic features from the tumor microenvironment, leading to the development of the Pancreas-View tool ultimately clinically validated in a cohort of 343 patients from the PRODIGE-24/CCTG PA6 trial. Results Patients who were predicted to be sensitive to the administered drugs (n=164; 47.8%) had longer disease-free survival (DFS) than the other patients. The median DFS in the mFFX sensitive group treated with mFFX was 50.0 months (stratified HR: 0.31; 95% CI, 0.21-0.44; p<0.001) and 33.7 months (stratified HR: 0.40; 95% CI, 0.17-0.59; p<0.001) in the gemcitabine sensitive group when treated with gemcitabine. Comparatively patients with signature predictions unmatched with the treatments (n=86; 25.1%) or those resistant to all drugs (n=93; 27.1%) had shorter DFS (10.6 and 10.8 months, respectively). Conclusions This study presents a transcriptome-based tool that was developed using preclinical models and machine learning to accurately predict sensitivity to mFFX and gemcitabine.

The combination of bevacizumab and FOLFIRINOX is used in patients with RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (RASm-mCRC). Regorafenib, an oral multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has antiangiogenic properties, cytostatic effects and also true cytotoxic effects, unlike bevacizumab. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the regorafenib-FOLFIRINOX combination in patients with RASm-mCRC. The FOLFIRINOX-R trial was a phase 1/2 study where the dose-escalation part (3 + 3 design with three dose levels, DLs) was completed before its early termination. FOLFIRINOX (14-day cycle) included oxaliplatin (standard dose), folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan (150 or 180 mg/m²). Regorafenib (120 or 160 mg daily) was given from day 4 to day 10 of each cycle. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was studied in the first three cycles. Eligibility criteria included ECOG performance status ≤ 1 and not previously treated RASm-mCRC. Thirteen patients (median age: 65 years; min-max: 40–76) were enrolled. DLT could not be evaluated in one patient (DL3) due to poor observance. The median treatment duration and median follow-up were 6.2 (min-max: 2.3–10) and 13.4 (min-max: 3.8–18.0) months, respectively. Dose was modified in 12/13 (92 ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT03828799.

Rivoceranib is an oral, selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. ANGEL (NCT03042611) was a global, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study evaluating rivoceranib as 3rd-line or ≥4th-line therapy in patients with advanced/metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. Patients had failed ≥2 lines of chemotherapy and were randomized 2:1 to rivoceranib 700 mg once daily or placebo with best supportive care. Primary endpoint: overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints: progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) by blinded independent central review (BICR). In total, 460 patients (rivoceranib n = 308, placebo n = 152) were enrolled. OS was not statistically different for rivoceranib versus placebo (median 5.78 vs. 5.13 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.93, 95

Purpose. - The standard treatment of T2-T3 rectal adenocarcinoma is radical proctectomy by total mesorectal excision often combined with some neoadjuvant treatment. To reduce morbidity of this surgery, organ preservation strategy using various combination of radiotherapy, chemotherapy and local excision is gaining interest. Some randomized trials have proven the feasibility of such approaches. The OPERA trial demonstrated, for tbl2 tbl3 < 5 cm diameter low-middle rectum, that a contact X-ray brachytherapy boost of 90 Gy in three fractions over 4 weeks was able to achieve a planned organ preservation in 81% of patients at 3 years with 97% success for tumour smaller than 3 cm treated with contact X-ray brachytherapy boost first. To try to expand organ preservation to larger tumours we set up a feasibility trial in T2-T3 tumours using total neoadjuvant treatment and a contact X-ray brachytherapy boost. Material and method. - The trial was approved by the institutional review board of Nice. Inclusion criteria were operable patients, 75 years or less, adenocarcinoma of the low-middle rectum staged T2c-T3N0 larger than 3.5 cm and less than 6 cm in diameter or T2-T3N1 less than 6 cm in diameter. Treatment started in all cases with neoadjuvant chemotherapy associating 5-fluoro-uracile, irinotecan and oxaliplatin ('folfirinox' regimen, four to six cycles). In case of good tumour response after four cycles, a contact X-ray brachytherapy boost (delivering 90 Gy in three fractions) was given followed by chemoradiotherapy (external beam radiotherapy delivering 50 Gy, with concurrent capecitabine). After six cycles if only a partial response (tumour still larger than 3 cm) was seen, chemoradiotherapy was given and contact X-ray brachytherapy boost was delivered after that. At the end of this total neoadjuvant treatment a watch and wait strategy was decided in case of clinical complete response or radical proctectomy by total mesorectal excision for partial response. Results. - Between July 2019 and October 2022, 14 patients were included; median age was 66 years (range: 51-77 years), there were nine male and five female, two T2 N1 tumours, seven T3N0, and five T3N1, all were M0. Median tumour diameter was 40 mm (range: 11-50 mm); three tumours had a circumferential extension greater than 50%. Seven patients received four folfirinox cycles and seven had six cycles. Contact X-ray brachytherapy boost was given during folfirinox chemotherapy before chemoradiotherapy in 11 patients (and after in three). The tolerance was good, with no grade 4-5 toxicity. The main grade 3 early toxicity was in relation with the folfirinox regimen. A clinical complete response was seen in 12 patients at the end of the total neoadjuvant treatment (85%). All these patients are alive and have preserved their rectum with a mean follow-up time of 17.8 months (range: 6-48 months) and a good bowel function (low anterior rectal resection syndrome score below 30). The main contact X-ray brachytherapy boost toxicity was radiation ulceration in three patients that usually healed within 6 months, sometimes necessitating hyperbaric oxygen. Conclusion. - The preliminary results of this feasibility study show that early tolerance of these intensive total neoadjuvant treatment is compatible with an acceptable toxicity. The high rate of organ preservation in this intermediate group of T2-T3 tumours is encouraging and is a good argument to start the next randomized TRESOR trial that will aim at achieving a 65% of 3-year survival with organ preservation in this intermediate tumour group. (c) 2024 Societe francaise aise de radiotherapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.

2 Background: CRT is the standard of care for locally advanced SCCA. However, up to 50% of pts experience recurrence/definitive colostomy; there is an unmet need for novel treatment (Tx) options to improve pt outcomes. mDCF is a standard first-line Tx for advanced SCCA, and anti-programmed death protein-1 (PD-1) immunotherapy has been shown to be effective in a subset of chemorefractory SCCA. Preclinical and clinical data support the feasibility and the potential of combining mDCF with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Methods: INTERACT-ION (NCT04719988) is an open-label, single-arm study in pts with Tx-naïve Stage III (T4N0 or TxN+) SCCA to evaluate ezabenlimab (anti-PD-1 antibody) plus mDCF as induction therapy, followed by CRT and then maintenance with ezabenlimab. Pts received induction ezabenlimab (240 mg intravenously, every 3 weeks, 3 cycles) plus mDCF (D [40 mg/m2], C [40 mg/m2] on Day 1; F [1200 mg/m2/day for 2 days] every 2 weeks, 4 cycles). If there was no disease progression after 2 months, pts received an additional cycle of ezabenlimab plus 2 cycles of mDCF. Planned early efficacy endpoint analyses were performed after 2 months of Tx. Pts with radiological objective response (OR; RECIST v1.1), pathological (p) complete response (CR)/near CR (<10% viable tumor cells) by repeat biopsy, and molecular CR (undetectable human papillomavirus [HPV] circulating tumor DNA) by liquid biopsy, received involved nodetumor bed CRT with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) followed by 7 cycles of ezabenlimab. All other pts received standard IMRT based-CRT. The primary endpoint is the clinical CR rate 10 months after Cycle 1 of ezabenlimab plus mDCF. Results: At analysis cut-off date,43 pts had been enrolled; 37 pts had preliminary early efficacy endpoint evaluation. All but 1 pt (97.3%) received the planned 4 cycles of ezabenlimab plus mDCF prior to evaluation; 1 pt presented with treatment-related capillary leak syndrome after Cycle 1 and died of a lung infection 3 months later. Radiological assessment was performed in 33 pts; 32 (97.0%) had radiological OR including 14 (42.4%) with CR. One HPV- pt had disease progression. Pathological response data were available for 21 pts; 16 (76.2%) had pCR/near pCR. For molecular response, 3 pts were HPV- (excluded). Among 23 HPV+ evaluable pts, 21 (91.3%) had a molecular CR. Two pts had a significant decrease at 2 months (decrease: 14/1 and 54/1); then molecular CR after radiotherapy. No safety signals were identified by an independent safety review committee. Conclusions: Preliminary results from this ongoing Phase II study show promising antitumor activity and manageable safety of ezabenlimab plus mDCF in pts with Tx-naïve, locally advanced SCCA. Further evaluation of this new treatment regimen is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT04719988 .

BackgroundTrifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is approved in third-line treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas (aGA/GEJA). The association of oxaliplatin with FTD/TPI is promising and the combination of FTD/TPI + oxaliplatin + nivolumab has shown a predictable and manageable safety profile.AimsThe aim is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI plus oxaliplatin with or without nivolumab in patients, with HER2 negative aGA/GEJA, unfit for triplet chemotherapy (TFOX/mFLOT regimen), in the first-line metastatic setting in comparison with the standard of care FOLFOX with or without nivolumab.MethodsThis study is a prospective randomised, open label, comparative, multicentre, phase II trial designed to include 118 patients. The primary objective is to evaluate the superiority of FTD/TPI plus oxaliplatin with or without nivolumab over FOLFOX regimen with or without nivolumab in terms of PFS in a population of patients non candidate for triplet chemotherapy. Nivolumab will be used for patients whose tumour express PD-L1 with a CPS score ≥5.DiscussionPRODIGE73-UCGI40-LOGICAN study will provide efficacy and safety data on the association of FTD/TPI plus oxaliplatin with or without nivolumab versus FOLFOX regimen with or without nivolumab in first-line palliative setting, in patients with aGA/GEJA (NCT05476796).