Availability data are scarce and primarily retrospective in patients with brain metastasis (BM) from gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. The objective of this cohort was to determine prognostic factors for survival outcomes in patients with BM from GI cancers. METACER is a national multicentric prospective cohort study which included patients with BM diagnosis during a histologically proven digestive cancer follow-up between 2010 and 2014. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were Progression-Free survival (PFS), prognostic factors, and BM-free survival as time from disease diagnosis to BM diagnosis. METACER included 130 patients, with colorectal cancer (CRC) (N = 105) and eso-gastric (N = 25) cancer (EGC). The median OS was 6.6 months: 7.1 months (95

BACKGROUND:Efficacy of 2nd line treatment in advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma remains limited with no identified strong predictor of treatment efficacy. We evaluated the prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in predicting the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) plus chemotherapy in the randomized PRODIGE 59-FFCD 1707-DURIGAST trial. METHODS:ctDNA was evaluated before treatment (baseline) and at 4 weeks (before the third cycle of treatment, C3) using droplet-digital PCR assays based on the detection of CpG methylation. RESULTS:Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were shorter in patients with a high (>1.1 ng/mL) versus low (<1.1 ng/mL) ctDNA concentration at baseline (2.3 vs. 5.8 months; HR = 2.19; 95% CI, 1.09-4.41; p = 0.03 and 4.5 vs. 12.9 months; HR = 2.73; 95% CI, 1.29-5.75; p < 0.01), respectively, after adjustment for identified prognostic variables. Patients with a ctDNA decrease ≤75% between baseline and C3 versus a ctDNA decrease >75% had a worse objective response rate (p = 0.007), shorter PFS (2.2 vs. 7.4 months, HR = 1.90; 95% CI, 1.03-3.51; p = 0.04) and OS (6.6 vs 16.0 months; HR = 2.18; 95% CI, 1.09-4.37; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS:An early decrease in ctDNA concentration is a strong predictor of the therapeutic efficacy of ICI plus chemotherapy in advanced gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Clinical Trial Information NCT03959293 (DURIGAST).

Importance:Efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric or gastrooesphageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma remains limited. Ojectives:To determine the efficacy of 1 or 2 immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with FOLFIRI (leucovorin [folinic acid], fluorouracil, and irinotecan) in the treatment of advanced gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Design, Setting, and Participants:The PRODIGE 59-FFCD 1707-DURIGAST trial is a randomized, multicenter, noncomparative, phase 2 trial, conducted from August 27, 2020, and June 4, 2021, at 37 centers in France that included patients with advanced gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma who had disease progression after platinum-based first-line chemotherapy. Intervention:Patients were randomized to receive FOLFIRI plus durvalumab (anti-programmed cell death 1 [PD-L1]) (FD arm) or FOLFIRI plus durvalumab and tremelimumab (anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 [CTLA-4]) (FDT arm). The efficacy analyses used a clinical cutoff date of January 9, 2023. Main outcome and Measures:The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 months according to RECIST 1.1 criteria evaluated by investigators. Results:Overall, between August 27, 2020, and June 4, 2021, 96 patients were randomized (48 in each arm). The median age was 59.7 years, 28 patients (30.4%) were women and 49 (53.3%) had GEJ tumors. Four month PFS was 44.7% (90% CI, 32.3-57.7) and 55.6% (90% CI, 42.3-68.3) in the FD and FDT arms, respectively. The primary end point was not met. Median PFS was 3.8 and 5.4 months, objective response rates were 34.7% and 37.7%, and median overall survival was 13.2 and 9.5 months in the FD and FDT arms, respectively. Disease control beyond 1 year was 14.9% in the FD arm and 24.4% in the FDT arm. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 22 (47.8%) patients in each arm. A combined positive score (CPS) PD-L1 of 5 or higher was observed in 18 tumors (34.0%) and a tumor proportion score (TPS) PD-L1 of 1% or higher in 13 tumors (24.5%). Median PFS according to CPS PD-L1 was similar (3.6 months for PD-L1 CPS ≥5 vs 5.4 months for PD-L1 CPS <5) by contrast for TPS PD-L1 (6.0 months for PD-L1 TPS ≥1% vs 3.8 months for PD-L1 TPS <1%). Conclusions and Relevance:Combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors with FOLFIRI in second-line treatment for advanced gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma showed an acceptable safety profile but antitumor activity only in a subgroup of patients. Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03959293.

Background: The impact of adapted physical activity (APA) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (aPDAC) is unknown. This study evaluated whether APA in addition to standard care improved HRQoL in patients who have aPDAC who are receiving first-line chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: Patients with locally advanced/metastatic PDAC and an ECOG performance status of 0 to 2 were randomized (1:1) to receive standard care (standard arm) or standard care plus a home-based 16-week APA program (APA arm). The primary objective was the effect of the APA program on 3 dimensions of the EORTC QLQ-C30: global health status, physical function, and fatigue at week 16 (W16), with a one-sided type I error of 0.017 for each dimension. The primary HRQoL analysis was performed in patients with available baseline and W16 scores for the dimensions (ie, the modified intention-to-treat population 1 [mITT1]), and secondary longitudinal HRQoL analyses using the mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) and time until definitive deterioration (TUDD) methods were performed in the mITT1 population and in patients with baseline and at least one follow-up questionnaire (mITT2 population). A difference of ≥5 points was considered to be clinically relevant. Results: Of 326 included patients, 313 were randomized to the standard (n=157) or APA (n=156) arms. In the mITT1 population (n=172), the mean differences in global health status, physical function, and fatigue at W16 adjusted from baseline were −0.98 (SD, 23.9; P =.39), −2.08 (SD, 21.3; P =.26), and 4.16 (SD, 29.2; P =.17), respectively, showing a non–statistically significant benefit with APA. In the mITT2 population (n=259), APA was associated with statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in 5 and 8 dimensions of the HRQoL in the longitudinal MMRM and TUDD analyses, respectively. Conclusions: APA improved several dimensions of HRQoL in patients with aPDAC receiving first-line chemotherapy and standard care.

The optimal treatment strategy after first-line induction therapy in advanced HER2-positive oeso-gastric adenocarcinoma (OGA) remains challenging. Patients treated with trastuzumab (T) plus platinum salts and fluoropyrimidine (F) as first-line chemotherapy between 2010 and 2020 for HER2-positive advanced OGA at 17 academic care centers in France, Italy, and Austria were included. The primary objective was the comparison of F + T vs T alone as maintenance regimen in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after a platinum-based chemotherapy induction + T. As secondary objective, PFS and OS between patients treated with reintroduction of initial chemotherapy or standard second-line chemotherapy at progression were assessed. Among the 157 patients included, 86 (55

4007 Background: The benefit of adapted physical activity (APA) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in Pts with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (aPDAC) treated by chemotherapy (CTx) has never been prospectively assessed. Methods: Pts with aPDAC and ECOG performance status (PS) 0–2 were randomized 1:1 to receive usual care (UC) including first-line CTx at the investigator’s choice (standard arm), or UC plus a home-based 16-week APA program (APA arm). The APA program consisted of personalized aerobic and resistance exercises, with a weekly remote supervision by an APA professional trainer, and unsupervised sessions with a family member or friend (APA partner). The primary objective was the effect on HRQoL at week 16 (W16) measured by 3 dimensions of the EORTC QLQ-C30, global health status (GHS), physical functioning (PF), and fatigue (FA), with a one-sided type I error of 0.016 for each dimension. The primary HRQoL analysis was performed in Pts with available baseline and W16 scores for the 3 targeted dimensions (mITT1). Secondary analyses of HRQoL changes by the mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) and time until definitive deterioration (TUDD) methods included Pts with baseline and ≥1 follow-up score (mITT2). Differences > 5 points in scores were considered clinically significant. Results: A total of 313 Pts (median age: 64 years; men: 55%, ECOG PS 0-1: 93%; metastatic: 77%; FOLFIRINOX: 78%, gemcitabine-based: 13%) were included from 11/2014 to 10/2020 (standard arm: n = 157, APA arm: n = 156). In the mITT1 population (n = 172), mean differences in HRQoL at W16 adjusted from baseline were -0.98 (SD 23.87; p = 0.39), -2.08 (SD 21.34; p = 0.26), and 4.16 (SD 29.18; p = 0.18) for GHS, PF, and FA, respectively. In the mITT2 population (n = 259), APA was associated with significant improvements in 5 (GHS, PF, cognitive functioning [CF], social functioning [SF], appetite loss) and 8 (GHS, CF, emotional functioning [EF], SF, insomnia, constipation, pain, financial difficulties) dimensions of HRQoL by MMRM and TUDD, respectively (Table). Secondary endpoints, including overall survival, progression-free survival, and chemotherapy toxicity will be presented. Conclusions: APA in combination with usual care improved several dimensions of HRQoL in Pts with aPDAC receiving first-line CTx. Clinical trial information: NCT02184663. [Table: see text]

No study up until now has evaluated the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy as 2nd line treatment of advanced gastric/gastro-oesphageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. DURIGAST PRODIGE 59 is a randomized, multicenter, phase II study designed to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of FOLFIRI plus durvalumab (anti-PD-L1) (FD) versus FOLFIRI plus durvalumab and tremelimumab (anti-CTLA-4) (FDT). Key eligibility criteria included advanced gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma, platinum-based first-line chemotherapy and ECOG performance status 0 or 1. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 months, which was expected to be 70%. Secondary endpoints included safety, overall survival (OS) and quality of life. Between August 2020 and June 2021, 96 patients were randomized, 48 in each arm. The median age was 59.7 years, 30.4% were women and 66.3% were ECOG PS 1. Half of patients had gastric tumors (50.0%), mostly with synchronous metastases (65.2%) and doublet first-line chemotherapy (63.0%). Only 4.3% were dMMR/MSI. The 4-month PFS were 44.7% [90%CI: 32.3–57.7] and 55.6% [90%CI: 42.3–68.3] in the FD and FDT arms, respectively. Median PFS were 3.8 and 5.4 months, objective response rates were 32.6% and 37.7% and median OS was 13.3 and 9.5 months in FD and FDT arms, respectively. However, a remarkable disease control over 1 year was observed in FDT arm (n=7, 15.2%) as compared FD arm (n=2, 4.3%). Grade 3-4 adverse events related to the treatment were 47.8% in each arm (asthenia: 17.4% vs 23.9%, neutropenia: 15.2% vs 23.9%, anemia: 10.9% vs 6.5%, diarrhea: 2.2% vs 10.9% and vomiting: 6.5% vs 2.2% in FD and FDT arms, respectively). Combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus FOLFIRI in 2nd line treatment for advanced gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma demonstrates an acceptable safety profile. Despite a negative result for the entire population, this combination seems to be very active in a sub-group of patients. Predictive factors of efficacy are currently explored, and will be presented during ESMO meeting.

Background At the start of 2021, oncologists lacked the necessary scientific knowledge to adapt their clinical practices optimally when faced with cancer patients refusing or reluctant to be vaccinated against COVID-19, despite the marked vulnerability of these patients to severe, and even fatal forms of this new viral infectious disease. Oncologists at Foch Hospital were confronted with this phenomenon, which was observed worldwide, in both the general population and the population of cancer patients. Methods Between April and November 2021, the Ethics and Oncology Departments of Foch Hospital decided to investigate this subject, through an empirical and interdisciplinary study in bioethics. Our scientific objective was to try to identify and resolve the principal bio-ethical issues, with a view to improving clinical practices in oncology during future major pandemics of this kind, from a highly specific bio-ethical standpoint (= quality of life/survival). We used a mainly qualitative methodological approach based on questionnaires and interviews. Results In April 2021, 29 cancer patients refused or were reluctant to be vaccinated (5.6%; 29/522). Seventeen of these patients said that making vaccination mandatory would have helped them to accept vaccination. In October 2021, only 10 cancer patients continued to maintain their refusal (1.9%; 10/522). One of the main reasons for the decrease in refusals was probably the introduction of the “ pass sanitaire ” (health pass) in July 2021, which rendered vaccination indispensable for many activities. However, even this was not sufficient to convince these 10 cancer patients. Conclusion We identified a key bio-ethical issue, which we then tried to resolve: vaccination policy. We characterized a major tension between “the recommendation of anti-COVID-19 vaccination” (a new clinical practice) and “free will” (a moral value), and the duty to “protect each other” (a moral standard). Mandatory vaccination, at least in France, could resolve this tension, with positive effects on quality of life (i.e. happiness), or survival, in cancer patients initially refusing or reluctant to be vaccinated, but only if collective and individual scales are clearly distinguished.

4036 Background: Efficacy of 2nd line chemotherapy in advanced gastric/gastro-oesphageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma remains limited. No study up until now has evaluated the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy as 2ndline treatment of advanced gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Methods: DURIGAST PRODIGE 59 is a randomized, multicenter, phase II study designed to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of FOLFIRI plus durvalumab (anti-PD-L1 until progression) (FD) versus FOLFIRI plus durvalumab and tremelimumab (anti-CTLA-4 for 4 cycles) (FDT). Key eligibility criteria included advanced gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma, platinum-based first-line chemotherapy and ECOG performance status (PS) 0 or 1. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to FD versus FDT. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 months, which was expected to be 70% (H0:50%). With an α risk of 5%, a power of 85% and 5% of non-evaluable patients, 47 evaluable patients are needed by arm. Secondary endpoints included safety, overall survival (OS) and quality of life. Results: Between August 2020 and June 2021, 96 patients were randomized, 48 in each arm. The median age was 59.7 years, 30.4% were women and 66.3% ECOG PS 1. All in all, 22.8% had HER2+ tumors and 4.3% dMMR/MSI tumors. The 4-month PFS were 44.7% [90%CI: 32.3–57.7] and 57.8% [90%CI: 44.5–70.3] in the FD and FDT arms, respectively. Primary endpoint was not met. Median PFS were 3.8 and 5.9 months, disease control rates 68.9% and 73.8% and median OS not reached and 10.1 months in FD and FDT arms, respectively. Eight patients in FDT arm had tremelimumab re-introduction at progression. Twenty-one patients, 8 in FD arm and 13 in FDT arm, are still being treated with a median duration of treatment of 7.8 and 10.9 months. All in all, 50.0% and 47.8% of patients experienced at least one grade 3-4 adverse events related to the treatment (neutropenia: 13.0 vs 21.7%, anemia: 10.9 vs 6.5%, diarrhea: 2.2 vs 8.7% and vomiting: 6.5 vs 10.9%), in FD and FDT arms, respectively. In both arms there was no clinically significant deterioration of quality of life superior to 10 points according to EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status. Conclusions: The DURIGAST PRODIGE 59 trial demonstrates an acceptable safety profile of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus FOLFIRI in 2nd line treatment for advanced gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma. FDT combination demonstrates a clinically relevant efficacy never before achieved with a median PFS of 6 months and should be evaluated in a phase III trial. Updated results including PFS according to centralized review and PD-L1 status will be presented during ASCO meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT03959293.

Introduction: Brain metastases (BMs) from colorectal cancer (CRC) are rare (approximate to 2%) but are increasing with the improvement of CRC prognosis. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic factors of BM from CRC. Materials and methods: This multicenter retrospective study included all consecutive patients with BM from CRC diagnosed between 2000 and 2017. Theory/calculation: Prognostic factors of OS were evaluated in univariate (log-rank test) and multivariate analyses (Cox regression model). These prognostic factors could help the management of patients with BM from CRC. Results: A total of 358 patients were included with a median age of 65.5 years. Primary tumors were mostly located in the rectum (42.4%) or left colon (37.2%) and frequently KRAS-mutated (56.9%). The median time from metastatic CRC diagnosis to BM diagnosis was 18.5 +/- 2.5 months. BMs were predominantly single (56.9%) and only supratentorial (54.4%). BM resection was performed in 33.0% of the cases and 73.2% of patients had brain radiotherapy alone or after surgery. Median OS was 5.1 +/- 0.3 months. In multivariate analysis, age under 65 years, ECOG performance status 0-1, single BM and less than 3 chemotherapy lines before BM diagnosis were associated with better OS. Prognostic scores, i.e. recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA), Disease Specific-Graded Prognostic Assessment (DS-GPA), Gastro-Intestinal-Graded Prognostic Assessment (GI-GPA) and the nomogram were statistically significantly associated with OS but the most relevant prognosis criteria seemed the ECOG performance status 0-1. Conclusions: ECOG performance status, number of BM and number of chemotherapy lines are the most relevant factors in the management of patients with BM from CRC. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 158 (2021) 67-73

AbstractPurpose:Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been suggested as a major prognostic factor in resected stage-III colon cancer. We analyzed ctDNA of patients randomized in the phase III IDEA-France trial.Experimental Design:ctDNA was tested for WIF1 and NPY by droplet digital PCR with method developed and validated for colorectal cancer. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed via multivariable analysis in patients with ctDNA samples and in sub-groups according to treatment duration (3/6 months) and disease stage (high/low-risk stage III).Results:Of 2,010 randomized patients, 1,345 had available ctDNA samples (1,017 collected both post-surgery and pre-chemotherapy). More Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 (78% versus 69%) and T4 and/or N2 (40% versus 36%) were observed in patients studied (n = 1017) versus not analyzed (n = 993). There were 877 ctDNA-negative (86.2%) and 140 ctDNA-positive (13.8%) patients; their baseline characteristics were similar. With a median follow-up of 6.6 years, the 3-year DFS rate was 66.39% for ctDNA-positive patients and 76.71% for ctDNA-negative patients (P = 0.015). ctDNA was confirmed as an independent prognostic marker for DFS (adjusted HR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.13–2.12, P = 0.006) and OS (HR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.12–2.43, P = 0.011). ctDNA was prognostic in patients treated for 3 months and with T4 and/or N2 tumors, but not in those treated for 6 months and with T1–3/N1 tumors.Conclusions:In this first ctDNA assessment of a large series of patients with stage III colon cancer enrolled in phase III trial, post-surgery ctDNA was found in 13.8% of them and was confirmed as an independent prognostic marker.See related commentary by Bent and Kopetz, p. 5449

Background: Cancer patients are thought to have an increased risk of developing severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and of dying from the disease. In this work, predictive factors for COVID-19 severity and mortality in cancer patients were investigated. Patients and methods: In this large nationwide retro-prospective cohort study, we collected data on patients with solid tumours and COVID-19 diagnosed between March 1 and 11th June 2020. The primary end-point was all-cause mortality and COVID-19 severity, defined as admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) and/or mechanical ventilation and/or death, was one of the secondary end-points. Results: From April 4 to 11th June 2020, 1289 patients were analysed. The most frequent cancers were digestive and thoracic. Altogether, 424 (33%) patients had a severe form of COVID-19 and 370 (29%) patients died. In multivariate analysis, independent factors associated with death were male sex (odds ratio 1.73, 95%CI: 1.18-2.52), The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Scale (ECOG PS) >= 2 (OR 3.23, 95%CI: 2.27-4.61), updated Charlson comorbidity index (OR 1.08, 95%CI: 1.01-1.16) and admission to ICU (OR 3.62, 95%CI 2.14-6.11). The same factors, age along with corticosteroids before COVID-19 diagnosis, and thoracic primary tumour site were independently associated with COVID-19 severity. None of the anticancer treatments administered within the previous 3 months had any effect on mortality or COVID-19 severity, except for cytotoxic chemotherapy in the subgroup of patients with detectable severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), which was associated with a slight increase of the risk of death (OR 1.53; 95%CI: 1.00-2.34; p = 0.05). A total of 431 (39%) patients had their systemic anticancer treatment (such as chemotherapy, targeted or immune therapy) interrupted or stopped following diagnosis of COVID-19. Conclusions: Mortality and COVID-19 severity in cancer patients are high and are associated with general characteristics of patients. We found no deleterious effects of recent anticancer treatments, except for cytotoxic chemotherapy in the RT-PCR-confirmed subgroup of patients. In almost 40% of patients, the systemic anticancer therapy was interrupted or stopped after COVID-19 diagnosis. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Background ctDNA has been recently suggested as a major prognostic factor in resected stage II and III colon cancer patients (pts)1,2. Its predictive value for adjuvant treatment intensity or duration is currently unknown. We have analyzed here ctDNA from pts enrolled in the IDEA-FRANCE trial3, its prognostic value and its predictive value for treatment duration (3 or 6 months). Methods ctDNA was tested by using the detection of 2 methylated markers (WIF1 and NPY) by digital droplet PCR accordingly to a method developed and validated for colorectal cancer 4-6. Comparisons for pts and tumour characteristics and DFS will be done between the ctDNA tested pts and the full study population and between ctDNA positive and negative pts. DFS has been analyzed in the 6 and 3M treatment arms according to ctDNA results. Subgroup analyses for high- and low-risk pts were pre-planned. Results Of the 1345/2010 pts that consented to the IDEA translational research program, with available blood sample for ctDNA testing, 805 have been sampled before chemotherapy start and fully analyzed. More PS 0 (77% vs 71%) and more T4 and/or N2 (28% vs 23%) were observed in the 805 pts studied here than in the 1205 pts left. 696 pts were found ctDNA- and 109 ctDNA + (13.5%). ctDNA+ pts were more often T4, poorly differentiated and with tumour perforation. 2-year DFS was 64% vs 82% in ctDNA+ and – pts, respectively (HR :1.75 (95%CI 1.25-2.45) p = 0.001). In multivariate analysis including Age, Gender, MSI, perforation, T stage, N stage and treatment arm, ctDNA was confirmed as an independent prognostic marker (adj.HR: 1.85 (95%CI 1.31 to 2.61) p Conclusions In this first ctDNA assessment on a large series coming from a phase III clinical trial we found 13.5% of pts with ctDNA post-surgery. ctDNA was confirmed as an independent prognostic marker. In this series, 6 months of treatment seems better in both ctDNA+ and- pts. [1]Tie J, et al. Circulating tumor DNA analysis detects minimal residual disease and predicts recurrence in patients with stage II colon cancer.Sci Transl Med. 2016 Jul 6;8(346):346ra92. [2]Scholer LV, et al. Clinical Implications of Monitoring Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients with Colorectal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 15;23(18):5437-5445. [3] Andre T, et al.Three Versus 6 Months of Oxaliplatin-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer: Disease-Free Survival Results From a Randomized, Open-Label, International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant (IDEA) France, phase III Trial.J Clin Oncol. 2018 May 20;36(15):1469-1477. [4] Garrigou S, et al. A Study of Hypermethylated Circulating Tumor DNA as a Universal Colorectal Cancer Biomarker. Clin Chem. 2016;62:1129-1139. [5] Garlan F, et al. Early Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA as Marker of Therapeutic Efficacy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients (PLACOL Study). Clin Cancer Res.2017;23:5416-5425. [6] Bachet JB, et al. RAS mutation analysis in circulating tumor DNA from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: the AGEO RASANC prospective multicenter study. Ann Oncol. 2018May 1;29(5):1211-1219. Clinical trial identification NCT00958737. Legal entity responsible for the study Gercor-Prodige. Funding Clinical trial: INCa, GERCOR; Translational project: ARC (Association de Recherche contre le Cancer, Paris, France). Disclosure J. Taieb: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: merck; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: amgen; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Servier; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: pierre fabre; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: MSD; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Lilly; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Sanofi. D. Vernerey: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: HalioDX; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen. J. Bennouna: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Boehringer Ingelheim. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

4019 Background: The incidence of SRC gastric cancers is markedly increasing in Western countries. SRC cancers may harbor intrinsic resistance to chemotherapy (CTx) leaving many clinicians unsure of the benefits of delaying surgery to pursue a neoadjuvant approach. The primary objective of this study was to assess whether upfront surgery plus adjuvant CTx would provide enough survival benefit for study in a phase III trial when compared to perioperative CTx. Methods: Patients with stage IB-III SRC gastric cancer were randomly assigned to receive upfront surgery plus adjuvant CTx (epirubicin, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil [ECF regimen], 6 cycles; experimental arm [SurgFirst]) or perioperative CTx (ECF, 3 cycles before and 3 cycles after surgery; control arm [CTxFirst]). Randomization (1:1) was stratified by tumor stage, tumor location, performance status and center. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) at 2 years (OS2; target (H1): OS2 > 26%). Results: 83 eligible patients were included in 27 centers from 11/12 to 09/16 (median age, 61 years (range: 32-80 years); male, 59%; ECOG PS 0-1, 99%). Results were (CTxFirst/SurgFirst): full completion of CTx, 87%/77%; surgical resection, 82.5%/90%; major postoperative complications (Clavien Dindo III-IV), 24%/23%; R0 resection rate, 88%/78%; OS2, 60%/53.5%; and median OS, 39/28 months (exploratory hazard ratio, 0.71 [95%CI: 0.40-2.64]). Conclusions: This trial met its primary endpoint (OS2 > 26% in the experimental arm). With OS2 rates > 50%, both CTx modalities deserve further evaluation in Phase III studies in stage IB-III SRC gastric cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT01717924.

Purpose Reduction of adjuvant treatment duration may decrease toxicities without loss of efficacy in stage III colon cancer. This could offer clear advantages to patients and health care providers. Methods In International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (IDEA) France, as part of the IDEA international collaboration, patient with colon cancer patients were randomly assigned to 3 and 6 months of modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6: infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) by physician choice. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS), and analyses were descriptive. Results A total of 2,010 eligible patients received either 3 or 6 months of chemotherapy (modified intention-to-treat population); 2,000 (99%) had stage III colon cancer (N1: 75%, N2: 25%); 1,809 (90%) received mFOLFOX6, and 201 (10%) received CAPOX. The median age was 64 years, and the median follow-up time was 4.3 years. Overall, 94% (3 months) and 78% (6 months) of patients completed treatment (fluoropyrimidines ± oxaliplatin). Maximal grade 2 and 3 neuropathy rates were 28% and 8% in the 3-month arm and 41% and 25% in the 6-month arm ( P < .001). Final rates of residual neuropathy greater than grade 1 were 3% in the 3-month arm and 7% in the 6-month arm ( P < .001). There were 578 DFS events: 314 and 264 in the 3- and 6-month arms, respectively. The 3-year DFS rates were 72% and 76% in the 3- and 6-month arms, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.46; P = .0112). In the 3 and 6-month arms, respectively, for patients who received mFOLFOX6, the 3-year DFS rates were 72% and 76% (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.51); for the T4 and/or N2 population, they were 58% and 66% (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.82); and for the T1-3N1 population, they were 81% and 83% (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.49). Conclusion IDEA France, in which 90% of patients received mFOLFOX6, shows superiority of 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy compared with 3 months, especially in the T4 and/or N2 subgroups. These results should be considered alongside the international IDEA collaboration data.

737 Background: Primary tumor sidedness (PTS) could be a predictive maker for treatment efficacy of EGFR inhibitors monoclonal antibodies in patients with wild-type (WT) RAS metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC), cetuximab having limited efficacy in patients with WT-RAS right-sided tumors. DREAM study demonstrated that adding erlotinib, an oral EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) to bevacizumab during maintenance therapy improved clinical outcomes (RR, PFS, OS) in patients with MCRC, whatever KRAS status. The aim of this post-hoc analysis is to evaluate the clinical outcomes according to KRAS mutational status and PTS when adding erlotinib to bevacizumab maintenance therapy. Methods: PTS was retrospectively collected in patients from the DREAM phase III trial treated with bevacizumab with or without erlotinib as maintenance therapy for MCRC who have been controlled by induction therapy. The limit for the definition of PTS was splenic flexure, and rectal tumors were considered as left-sided tumors. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: Among 452 patients who received maintenance therapy, PTS ascertainment was 84.7% (n = 383) with 265 (71.0%) patients having left-sided primary tumor and 108 (28.9%) having right-sided primary tumors (3 patients had both and tumor location was unknown in 7 patients). Median OS and treatment effect are presented in table 1. Conclusions: The greatest OS benefit of adding erlotinib to bevacizumab maintenance therapy was observed in patients with WT-KRAS and right-sided MCRC, suggesting a clinical impact of the different mechanism of action between EGFR TKI and monoclonal antibodies. Clinical trial information: NCT00265824. [Table: see text]

3500 Background: The IDEA international collaboration was established to combine data from 6 randomized trials to assess whether a 3-month (3M) of oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidines-based adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) is non-inferior to the 6-month (6M) for 3-year disease free survival (DFS) in stage III colon cancer (CC). Methods: French IDEA randomized patients (pts) between 3M and 6M of CT with mFOLFOX6 or XELOX (physician/pts choice). DFS was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and described using 3 years DFS rate. Results: Among 2022 randomized pts between May 2009 and May 2014, 2010 (99.4%) received CT and were enrolled in the mITT population: 49.9 and 50.1% in 3M and 6M, respectively. 99.5% of the mITT pts had stage III (N1: 74.9%; N2: 25.2%); median age 63.9 years; mFOLFOX6: 90% and XELOX 10% of pts. DFS median follow-up is 50.2 months. There were 578 DFS events (314 in 3M and 264 in 6M arm) leading to a 3-year DFS rate of 72.1% in the 3M vs. 75.7% in the 6M (HR=1.24; 95%CI 1.05–1.46, p=0.0112). For pts receiving mFOLFOX6, 3-year DFS rate was 72.0% in the 3M vs. 76.3% in the 6M (HR=1.27; 95%CI 1.07–1.51 p=0.0069). 94.2% and 78.0% of pts completed 3 and 6 months of CT, respectively. Median oxaliplatin doses intensity were 96.9% in 3M and 72.1% in 6M (495.0 and 735.1 mg/m2). By considering the neuropathy grade with 15375 neuropathy longitudinal measurements the overall maximal neuropathy grade 0-1/2/3-4 was 63.6/28.5/7.9% in 3M and 33.4/41.3/25.3% in 6M; p<0.0001. At last follow-up assessment, with a median of 43.1 months, final residual grade 2/3-4 neuropathy was 2.1/0.4% in 3M and 5.4/1.3% in 6M; p<0.0001. Conclusions: The IDEA France study, with 90% of patients treated with mFOLFOX6 regimen has shown that 6 months adjuvant treatment is superior to 3 months treatment. IDEA France study results should be considered in line with the international IDEA project that will also be presented at ASCO 2017. Clinical trial information: 2009-010384-16.

94 Background: Trastuzumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard first line regimen in HER2 positive advanced gastric cancer. However, there is no data concerning continuation of trastuzumab beyond first line progression. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study include all consecutive patients with HER2 + advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma who received after progression of trastuzumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy, a second line chemotherapy with irinotecan, taxane or platinum salt, with or without trastuzumab. The prognostic variables with P values ≤0.10 in univariate analysis were eligible for the Cox multivariable regression model. Results: From August 2007 to March 2015, 104 patients were included (median age, 60.8 years; male, 78.8%; PS 0-1, 71.2%) with advanced (metastatic : 99%) gastric (45.2%) or GEJ (54.8%) cancer. All patients had received first line treatment based on trastuzumab plus fluoropyrimidine and cisplatin (n=54; 51.9%) or oxaliplatin (n=50; 48.1%). As second line chemotherapy, 67 patients (64.4%) received FOLFIRI regimen, including 19 who have continued trastuzumab; 23 patients (22.1%) received a taxane regimen (paclitaxel or docetaxel), including 12 with trastuzumab; and 14 patients (13.5%) received a platinum-based chemotherapy (different from that used in first-line), including 8 with trastuzumab. When considering all regimens of second-line chemotherapy, continuation (n=39) versus discontinuation (n=65) of trastuzumab was significantly associated with an increase on PFS (4.4 vs 2.3 months; p=0.002) and OS (12.6 vs 6.1 months; p=0.001). In multivariate Cox model (including ECOG PS, tumor grade, number of metastatic site, and second-line treatment), continuation of trastuzumab was significantly associated with longer PFS (HR=0.56; 95%CI [0.35-0.89]; p=0.01) and OS (HR=0.47; 95%CI [0.28-0.79]; p=0.004). Conclusions: This study suggests that maintenance of trastuzumab plus second line chemotherapy beyond disease progression has clinical benefit in patients with HER2 positive advanced gastric cancer. These results deserve a prospective randomized validation.