Einleitung In mehreren Ballungszentren wurde eine Epidemie von akuten Hepatitis C Virusinfektionen (aHCV) bei HIV-infizierten Männern (MSM, men who have sex with men) beobachtet. Die SVR Raten (sustained virologic response) nach einer DAA (direct acting antivirals) Therapie waren hoch, jedoch wurden bei MSM wiederholte HCV-Reinfektionen beobachtet. In dieser Studie wurden die epidemiologischen, klinischen und phylogenetischen Parameter der akuten Hepatitis C über einen 10 Jahres Zeitraum untersucht.

Darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) 800/150/200/10 mg is being investigated in two Phase III trials, AMBER (NCT02431247; treatment-naive adults) and EMERALD (NCT02269917; treatment-experienced, virologically suppressed adults). Week 48 AMBER and EMERALD resistance analyses are presented. Postbaseline samples for genotyping/phenotyping were analyzed from protocol-defined virologic failures (PDVFs) with viral load (VL) ≥400 copies/mL at failure/later time points. Post hoc analyses were deep sequencing in AMBER, and HIV-1 proviral DNA from baseline samples (VL <50 copies/mL) in EMERALD. Through week 48 across both studies, no darunavir, primary PI, or tenofovir resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) were observed in HIV-1 viruses of 1,125 participants receiving D/C/F/TAF or 629 receiving boosted darunavir plus emtricitabine/tenofovir-disoproxil-fumarate. In AMBER, the nucleos(t)ide analog reverse transcriptase inhibitor (N(t)RTI) RAM M184I/V was identified in HIV-1 of one participant during D/C/F/TAF treatment. M184V was detected pretreatment as a minority variant (9%). In EMERALD, in participants with prior VF and genoarchive data (N = 140; 98 D/C/F/TAF and 42 control), 4% had viruses with darunavir RAMs, 38% with emtricitabine RAMs, mainly at position 184 (41% not fully susceptible to emtricitabine), 4% with tenofovir RAMs, and 21% ≥ 3 thymidine analog-associated mutations (24% not fully susceptible to tenofovir) detected at screening. All achieved VL <50 copies/mL at week 48 or prior discontinuation. D/C/F/TAF has a high genetic barrier to resistance; no darunavir, primary PI, or tenofovir RAMs were observed through 48 weeks in AMBER and EMERALD. Only one postbaseline M184I/V RAM was observed in HIV-1 of an AMBER participant. In EMERALD, baseline archived RAMs to darunavir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir in participants with prior VF did not preclude virologic response.

Bislang ist nicht hinreichend geklärt, inwiefern die Dynamik der Alanin-Aminotransferase (ALT) den natürlichen Verlauf der chronischen Hepatitis B prognostisch beeinflusst.

Background: Doravirine is a novel, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy in treatment-naive adults with HIV-1. Methods: In this open-label, active-controlled, noninferiority trial, adults with HIV-1 virologically suppressed for ≥6 months on 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors plus a boosted protease inhibitor, boosted elvitegravir, or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor were randomized (2:1) to switch to once-daily, single-tablet doravirine 100 mg with lamivudine 300 mg and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg (DOR/3TC/TDF) or to continue their current therapy (Baseline Regimen) for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (defined by the FDA Snapshot approach), with the primary comparison between DOR/3TC/TDF at week 48 and Baseline Regimen at week 24 and a secondary comparison between the groups at week 24 (noninferiority margin, −8%). Results: Six hundred seventy participants (447 DOR/3TC/TDF, 223 Baseline Regimen) were treated and included in the analyses. At week 24, 93.7% on DOR/3TC/TDF vs 94.6% on Baseline Regimen had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL [difference −0.9 (−4.7 to 3.0)]. At week 48, 90.8% on DOR/3TC/TDF had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL, demonstrating noninferiority vs Baseline Regimen at week 24 [difference −3.8 (−7.9 to 0.3)]. In participants on ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor at entry, mean reductions in fasting LDL-C and non-HDL-C at week 24 were significantly greater for DOR/3TC/TDF vs Baseline Regimen (P < 0.0001). Adverse events occurred in 68.9% on DOR/3TC/TDF and 52.5% on Baseline Regimen by week 24, leading to treatment discontinuation in 2.5% and 0.4%, respectively. Conclusions: Switching to once-daily DOR/3TC/TDF is a generally well-tolerated option for maintaining viral suppression in patients considering a change in therapy. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02397096.

OBJECTIVES:Raltegravir is used in many antiretroviral combinations, but its use in treatment-experienced patients without knowledge of baseline resistance is discussed controversially as a number of comparative studies have shown a higher rate of virological failure. However, it has been used frequently for the management of treatment failure, as it was the first integrase inhibitor to become available, and thus offered new options for patients with multiple resistance. The strategic use of raltegravir in this setting is examined in this study.METHODS:In order to examine the efficacy of raltegravir in second and later lines of antiretroviral combinations, data for 740 patients from three clinical cohorts were analysed with a focus on the combinations that were used. These were stratified into the combination of two nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and raltegravir (2NRTIs + RAL), the combination of a boosted protease inhibitor and raltegravir (bPI + RAL), and other raltegravir-containing combinations.RESULTS:The overall rate of virological suppression to < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL was 69.5%. Although the baseline rate of virological suppression was higher for 2NRTIs + RAL than for the other strata, the outcomes were similar for all three groups at weeks 24, 48, 72 and 96.CONCLUSIONS:These data indicate that, in a real-life setting, raltegravir can be used with a high virological success rate in treatment-experienced patients, and that the different combinations analysed (2NRTIs + RAL, bPI + RAL and others) show comparable rates of virological suppression.

Studien aus Asien zeigten, dass die einmalige Bestimmung der Ausgangsviruslast prognostisch bedeutsam ist für den Krankheitsverlauf bei niedrig-replikativer HBV-Infektion. Es gibt bislang wenige Daten zur klinischen Relevanz von dynamischen viralen und biochemischen Parametern für den Langzeitverlauf.

To evaluate the treatment outcome of antiretroviral therapy, depending on the use and utility of a concept of resistance-guided switch, patients from the Frankfurt HIV cohort have been followed for 24 weeks. If available, prior resistance data have been evaluated and patients were grouped into their expected viral response. The data of 354 patients were thus analysed, taking into account the genotypic sensitivity score of the administered medication (> or ≤2). When looking at the proportion of patients who achieved a viral load of <50/ml, the response rates differed significantly better for patients with a favourable resistance scoring as compared to an unfavourable one (71.9 % as compared to 56.0 %, p = 0.008). Interestingly, patients with a favourable resistance score also showed a better immunological response, as measured by median CD4 cell count of 391/µl [interquartal range (IQR) 250–530/µl] against 287/µl (IQR 174–449/µl) and a larger total increase of 141/µl against 38/µl. A significant virological and immunological benefit could be demonstrated for patients of a cohort with resistance-guided antiretroviral therapy adjustments.

Background and objective: Renal disease is a common complication in HIV-infected patients. The causes and spectrum of kidney disease among these patients is extensive, including HIV-related and HIV unrelated causes. Our objective was to assess the changes in distribution of renal disease under antiretroviral therapy (ART). Patients and methods: Retrospective analysis of all patients from the Frankfurt HIV Cohort (FHC) who underwent renal biopsy because of chronic, progressive renal disease between 1989 and 2012. Two time periods were defined: 1989-2001 (early period) and 2000-2012 (late period). Results: 69 HIV-infected patients, mostly Caucasian and male, underwent renal biopsy (early period: 22 patients, late period: 47 patients). During the total observation time immuncomplex-mediated glomerulonephritis (26.1 %), hypertensive (20.3 %) and diabetic nephropathy (20.3 %) were the most frequent causes of chronic renal disease. HIV-associated renal diseases were predominant in the first period, whereas hypertensive and diabetic kidney disease accounted for almost 50 % of cases diagnosed in the late period. Other types of renal disease frequently encountered during the late period include renal AA-amyloidosis and tenofovir-related kidney disease. Conclusion: The underlying pathology of renal disease in HIV-infected patients is highly variable and evolving. Since the introduction of HAART, renal disease not directly related to HIV has become the predominant cause, reflecting the growing burden of co-morbidities in this aging population.

Renal disease is a common complication in HIV-infected patients. The causes and spectrum of kidney disease among these patients is extensive, including HIV-related and HIV unrelated causes. Our objective was to assess the changes in distribution of renal disease under antiretroviral therapy (ART).Retrospective analysis of all patients from the Frankfurt HIV Cohort (FHC) who underwent renal biopsy because of chronic, progressive renal disease between 1989 and 2012. Two time periods were defined: 1989-2001 (early period) and 2000-2012 (late period).69 HIV-infected patients, mostly Caucasian and male, underwent renal biopsy (early period: 22 patients, late period: 47 patients). During the total observation time immuncomplex-mediated glomerulonephritis (26.1 %), hypertensive (20.3 %) and diabetic nephropathy (20.3 %) were the most frequent causes of chronic renal disease. HIV-associated renal diseases were predominant in the first period, whereas hypertensive and diabetic kidney disease accounted for almost 50 % of cases diagnosed in the late period. Other types of renal disease frequently encountered during the late period include renal AA-amyloidosis and tenofovir-related kidney disease.The underlying pathology of renal disease in HIV-infected patients is highly variable and evolving. Since the introduction of HAART, renal disease not directly related to HIV has become the predominant cause, reflecting the growing burden of co-morbidities in this aging population.

ObjectivesThe renal elimination of tenofovir (TFV) may be subject to renal drug-drug interactions that may increase the risk of kidney injury. Case reports indicated that diclofenac might increase TFV-associated nephrotoxicity via a drug-drug interaction, leading to an increased intracellular TFV concentration in proximal tubular cells.MethodsA retrospective analysis of data for all patients from the Frankfurt HIV Cohort (FHC) who had diclofenac prescriptions between January 2008 and June 2012 was carried out.ResultsAmong 89 patients with diclofenac use, 61 patients (68.5%) were treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and 28 patients (31.5%) were treated with TDF-sparing combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). Thirteen patients (14.6%) developed acute kidney injury (AKI) shortly after initiating diclofenac treatment. AKI occurred exclusively in TDF-treated patients, although all had previously stable renal function. All cases were accompanied by new onset of at least two parameters indicating proximal tubular damage, such as normoglycaemic-glucosuria and hypophosphataemia. TFV-associated nephrotoxicity was demonstrated by renal biopsy in four cases. Additionally, 11.5% of patients on TDF treatment developed new-onset proximal tubular damage, while having a preserved glomerular filtration rate. In contrast, diclofenac did not affect renal function in patients with TDF-sparing cART, as only one case of isolated hypophataemia was observed in these patients. In univariate analysis, risk factors for AKI were TDF-containing cART (P=0.0076) and pre-existing hypophosphataemia (P=0.0086).ConclusionsDrug-drug interaction caused by diclofenac could exacerbate TFV-associated nephrotoxicity. Diclofenac should be used with caution in patients on TDF therapy, especially in those with hypophosphataemia. Our findings need to be confirmed in larger studies.