OBJECTIVES:Clinical experience regarding the use of dedicated photon-counting breast CT (PC-BCT) for diagnosis of breast microcalcifications is scarce. This study systematically compares the detection and classification of breast microcalcifications using a dedicated breast photon-counting CT, especially designed for examining the breast, in comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). MATERIALS AND METHODS:This is a prospective intraindividual study on women with DBT screening-detected BI-RADS-4/-5 microcalcifications who underwent PC-BCT before biopsy. PC-BCT images were reconstructed with a noninterpolated spatial resolution of 0.15 × 0.15 × 0.15 mm (reconstruction mode 1 [RM-1]) and with 0.3 × 0.3 × 0.3 mm (reconstruction mode 2 [RM-2]), plus thin-slab maximum intensity projection (MIP) reconstructions. Two radiologists independently rated the detection of microcalcifications in direct comparison with DBT on a 5-point scale. The distribution and morphology of microcalcifications were then rated according to BI-RADS. The size of the smallest discernible microcalcification particle was measured. For PC-BCT, the average glandular dose was determined by Monte Carlo simulations; for DBT, the information provided by the DBT system was used. RESULTS:Between September 2022 and July 2023, 22 participants (mean age, 61; range, 42-85 years) with microcalcifications (16 malignant; 6 benign) were included. In 2/22 with microcalcifications in the posterior region, microcalcifications were not detectable on PC-BCT, likely because they were not included in the PC-BCT volume. In the remaining 20 participants, microcalcifications were detectable. With high between-reader agreement (κ > 0.8), conspicuity of microcalcifications was rated similar for DBT and MIPs of RM-1 (mean, 4.83 ± 0.38 vs 4.86 ± 0.35) ( P = 0.66), but was significantly lower ( P < 0.05) for the remaining PC-BCT reconstructions: 2.11 ± 0.92 (RM-2), 2.64 ± 0.80 (MIPs of RM-2), and 3.50 ± 1.23 (RM-1). Identical distribution qualifiers were assigned for PC-BCT and DBT in 18/20 participants, with excellent agreement (κ = 0.91), whereas identical morphologic qualifiers were assigned in only 5/20, with poor agreement (κ = 0.44). The median size of smallest discernible microcalcification particle was 0.2 versus 0.6 versus 1.1 mm in DBT versus RM-1 versus RM-2 ( P < 0.001), likely due to blooming effects. Average glandular dose was 7.04 mGy (PC-BCT) versus 6.88 mGy (DBT) ( P = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS:PC-BCT allows reliable detection of in-breast microcalcifications as long as they are not located in the posterior part of the breast and allows assessment of their distribution, but not of their individual morphology.

Background The level of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) at breast MRI provides predictive and prognostic information and can have diagnostic implications. However, there is a lack of standardization regarding BPE assessment. Purpose To investigate how well results of quantitative BPE assessment methods correlate among themselves and with assessments made by radiologists experienced in breast MRI. Materials and Methods In this pseudoprospective analysis of 5773 breast MRI examinations from 3207 patients (mean age, 60 years ± 10 [SD]), the level of BPE was prospectively categorized according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System by radiologists experienced in breast MRI. For automated extraction of BPE, fibroglandular tissue (FGT) was segmented in an automated pipeline. Four different published methods for automated quantitative BPE extractions were used: two methods (A and B) based on enhancement intensity and two methods (C and D) based on the volume of enhanced FGT. The results from all methods were correlated, and agreement was investigated in comparison with the respective radiologist-based categorization. For surrogate validation of BPE assessment, how accurately the methods distinguished premenopausal women with (n = 50) versus without (n = 896) antihormonal treatment was determined. Results Intensity-based methods (A and B) exhibited a correlation with radiologist-based categorization of 0.56 ± 0.01 and 0.55 ± 0.01, respectively, and volume-based methods (C and D) had a correlation of 0.52 ± 0.01 and 0.50 ± 0.01 (P < .001). There were notable correlation differences (P < .001) between the BPE determined with the four methods. Among the four quantitation methods, method D offered the highest accuracy for distinguishing women with versus without antihormonal therapy (P = .01). Conclusion Results of different methods for quantitative BPE assessment agree only moderately among themselves or with visual categories reported by experienced radiologists; intensity-based methods correlate more closely with radiologists' ratings than volume-based methods. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Mann in this issue.

Abstract Background To compare denoising diffusion probabilistic models (DDPM) and generative adversarial networks (GAN) for recovering contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) subtraction images from virtual low-dose subtraction images. Methods Retrospective, ethically approved study. DDPM- and GAN-reconstructed single-slice subtraction images of 50 breasts with enhancing lesions were compared to original ones at three dose levels (25%, 10%, 5%) using quantitative measures and radiologic evaluations. Two radiologists stated their preference based on the reconstruction quality and scored the lesion conspicuity as compared to the original, blinded to the model. Fifty lesion-free maximum intensity projections were evaluated for the presence of false-positives. Results were compared between models and dose levels, using generalized linear mixed models. Results At 5% dose, both radiologists preferred the GAN-generated images, whereas at 25% dose, both radiologists preferred the DDPM-generated images. Median lesion conspicuity scores did not differ between GAN and DDPM at 25% dose (5 versus 5, p = 1.000) and 10% dose (4 versus 4, p = 1.000). At 5% dose, both readers assigned higher conspicuity to the GAN than to the DDPM (3 versus 2, p = 0.007). In the lesion-free examinations, DDPM and GAN showed no differences in the false-positive rate at 5% (15% versus 22%), 10% (10% versus 6%), and 25% (6% versus 4%) (p = 1.000). Conclusions Both GAN and DDPM yielded promising results in low-dose image reconstruction. However, neither of them showed superior results over the other model for all dose levels and evaluation metrics. Further development is needed to counteract false-positives. Relevance statement For MRI-based breast cancer screening, reducing the contrast agent dose is desirable. Diffusion probabilistic models and generative adversarial networks were capable of retrospectively enhancing the signal of low-dose images. Hence, they may supplement imaging with reduced doses in the future. Key points • Deep learning may help recover signal in low-dose contrast-enhanced breast MRI. • Two models (DDPM and GAN) were trained at different dose levels. • Radiologists preferred DDPM at 25%, and GAN images at 5% dose. • Lesion conspicuity between DDPM and GAN was similar, except at 5% dose. • GAN and DDPM yield promising results in low-dose image reconstruction. Graphical Abstract

Objectives Clinical experience regarding the use of dedicated photon-counting breast CT (PC-BCT) for diagnosis of breast microcalcifications is scarce. This study systematically compares the detection and classification of breast microcalcifications using a dedicated breast photon-counting CT, especially designed for examining the breast, in comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Materials and Methods This is a prospective intraindividual study on women with DBT screening–detected BI-RADS-4/-5 microcalcifications who underwent PC-BCT before biopsy. PC-BCT images were reconstructed with a noninterpolated spatial resolution of 0.15 × 0.15 × 0.15 mm (reconstruction mode 1 [RM-1]) and with 0.3 × 0.3 × 0.3 mm (reconstruction mode 2 [RM-2]), plus thin-slab maximum intensity projection (MIP) reconstructions. Two radiologists independently rated the detection of microcalcifications in direct comparison with DBT on a 5-point scale. The distribution and morphology of microcalcifications were then rated according to BI-RADS. The size of the smallest discernible microcalcification particle was measured. For PC-BCT, the average glandular dose was determined by Monte Carlo simulations; for DBT, the information provided by the DBT system was used. Results Between September 2022 and July 2023, 22 participants (mean age, 61; range, 42–85 years) with microcalcifications (16 malignant; 6 benign) were included. In 2/22 with microcalcifications in the posterior region, microcalcifications were not detectable on PC-BCT, likely because they were not included in the PC-BCT volume. In the remaining 20 participants, microcalcifications were detectable. With high between-reader agreement (κ > 0.8), conspicuity of microcalcifications was rated similar for DBT and MIPs of RM-1 (mean, 4.83 ± 0.38 vs 4.86 ± 0.35) (P = 0.66), but was significantly lower (P < 0.05) for the remaining PC-BCT reconstructions: 2.11 ± 0.92 (RM-2), 2.64 ± 0.80 (MIPs of RM-2), and 3.50 ± 1.23 (RM-1). Identical distribution qualifiers were assigned for PC-BCT and DBT in 18/20 participants, with excellent agreement (κ = 0.91), whereas identical morphologic qualifiers were assigned in only 5/20, with poor agreement (κ = 0.44). The median size of smallest discernible microcalcification particle was 0.2 versus 0.6 versus 1.1 mm in DBT versus RM-1 versus RM-2 (P < 0.001), likely due to blooming effects. Average glandular dose was 7.04 mGy (PC-BCT) versus 6.88 mGy (DBT) (P = 0.67). Conclusions PC-BCT allows reliable detection of in-breast microcalcifications as long as they are not located in the posterior part of the breast and allows assessment of their distribution, but not of their individual morphology.

Figure S4. FGFR1 dependency in 584-A2 and CCL30 cells assessed by RNAi-mediated FGFR1 silencing.

Background: The detection of regional lymph node metastases (LNM), in particular significant LNM (≥N2), is important to guide treatment decisions in women with breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a coronal pulse sequence as part of pre-operative breast MRI is useful to identify women without significant LNM. Material: Retrospective study between January 2017 and December 2019 on 414 consecutive women with breast cancer who underwent pre-operative breast MRI on a 1.5 T system. For lymph node (LN) staging, a coronal pre-contrast non-fat-suppressed T1-weighted TSE sequence was acquired with the system’s built-in body coil, covering the chest wall; acquisition time 3:12 min. Two radiologists rated the likelihood of LNM on a 3-point scale (absent/possible/present). Validation was obtained by histology from sentinel LN biopsy, axillary LN dissection, and/or PET/CT. Results: 368/414 women were staged to have no or non-significant LNM (pN0 in 282/414, pN1 in 86/414), and significant LNM (≥pN2) in 46/414. For identification of women with significant LNM, MRI was true-positive in 42/46, false-negative in 4/46, true-negative in 327/368, and false-positive in 41/83, the latter mostly caused by women with N1-disease (38/41), yielding an NPV and PPV for significant LNM of 98.8% [95%-CI: 97.0–100%] and 50.6% [43.1–58.1%], respectively. Conclusions: A 3 min coronal T1-weighted pulse sequence covering the chest wall as part of pre-operative breast MRI is useful to rule out significant LNM with high NPV. Where MRI staging is positive for significant LNM, additional work-up is indicated to improve the distinction of N1 and N2 disease.

Table S1. The panel of HNSCC PDXs was submitted to FGFR1 gene copy number (GCN) by CISH and mRNA levels by in situ hybridization (ISH) assay.

Figure S1. Representative images of FGFR1 GCN assayed by FISH in HNSCC cell lines.

Figure S3. Correlation of FGFR1 mRNA and protein expression with BGJ398 sensitivity.

Figure S5. In situ hybridization (ISH) assay for FGFR1 mRNA in primary HNSCC tissue.

Figure S2. Effect of BGJ398 on Ki67 staining, cleaved caspase 3 levels and phospho-ERK levels in HNSCC cell lines.

Zielsetzung Erste Erfahrungen zur Beurteilbarkeit von Mikroverkalkungen (MC) unter Verwendung eines dedizierten Photon-Counting-Brust-CTs (PC-BCT) im intra-individuellen Vergleich zur Digitalen Tomosynthese (DBT).

PURPOSE:To evaluate the effect of a cylindrical regional-suppression technique (CREST) on image quality and lesion conspicuity in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the breast. METHOD:This was a comparative study of 67 women with 44 lesions who underwent breast DCE-MRI with CREST (CREST-DCE) and had a previous DCE-MRI without CREST (conv-DCE) available. Two radiologists assessed image quality parameters and lesion conspicuity using five-point Likert scales. In an intra-individual comparison, the effects of CREST on image quality (strong degradation to strong improvement) were assessed. Moreover, both radiologists identified the post-contrast phase, which benefited the most from using CREST in direct comparison. The statistical analysis included the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS:Cardiac motion-rated artefacts were significantly reduced in CREST-DCE compared to conv-DCE (3.6 ± 1.2 [CREST-DCE] vs 2.1 ± 0.8 [conv-DCE], p < 0.001). At the axilla, the visualisation of anatomical structures (3.9 ± 1.0 vs 2.3 ± 1.2, p < 0.001) and the skin contour (4.3 ± 0.8 vs 3.0 ± 1.1, p < 0.001) were significantly improved in CREST-DCE, whereas ghosting artefacts were significantly less pronounced (3.8 ± 1.1 vs 2.4 ± 1.0, p < 0.001). The parasternal region was similarly assessable using both techniques (4.3 ± 1.1 vs 4.2 ± 1.2, p = 0.47). In direct comparison, CREST-DCE images were classified as "improved" in 54/67 and "equivalent" in 13/67 exams. The effects of CREST were found to be most pronounced in the very early post-contrast phase (32/67). The lesion conspicuity was rated similar for CREST and conv-DCE (4.7 ± 0.7 vs 4.8 ± 0.2, p = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS:CREST appears to be an effective tool to reduce cardiac motion-related artefacts and, therefore, may improve image quality in breast DCE-MRI without impairing lesion conspicuity.

Figure S6. Correlation of HPV-expression and FGFR1 mRNA expression.

Zielsetzung Die Detektion von signifikanten (>N1) Lymphknotenmetastasen (LNM) ist entscheidend für die Therapieplanung bei Patientinnen mit neu diagnostiziertem Brustkrebs. Ziel der Studie war es, herauszufinden, ob eine zusätzliche, mit der Körperspule akquirierte, kurze Pulssequenz Patientinnen ohne signifikante LNM identifizieren kann.

Material und Methoden Retrospektive Analyse von 1002 Frauen, die zwischen 06/2010 – 08/2020 ausschließlich mittels (fokussierter) MRT (d.h. ohne Mammographie) nachgesorgt wurden. Die kontrastverstärkte MRT (1,5 T) wurde, mit einer Mehrkanal-Brustspule nach einem 7 Minuten dauernden, standardisierten Protokoll, durchgeführt. Die Validierung der jeweils letzten MRT erfolgte durch 2-jährige Verlaufskontrolle mit (347/1002) oder ohne (539/1002) Tomosynthese; bei 116/1002 mittels Biopsie.

OBJECTIVE:To investigate how often biopsy of two sites of morphologically similar or equally suspicious calcifications within the same breast yield differing histopathologic results, and how this may affect clinical management. MATERIALS AND METHODS:We identified patients with two or more sites of calcifications categorized as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) ≥ 4b within the same breast who underwent digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (DBT-guided VAB). We analyzed how often biopsy of two distinct sites yielded the same or differing histopathologic findings. The histopathologic findings were dichotomized into "actionable" and "non-actionable", depending on the respective further management. We then analyzed how often the consecutive management would have been the same or different. RESULTS:Of 206 women undergoing DBT-guided VAB at our institution within 24 months, 21 consecutive patients (54 ± 10.2 years; range: 35-71) underwent DBT-guided VAB of two distinct sites of calcifications. Management of histologic findings was the same (both sites actionable or both sites non-actionable) in 12/21 (57 %), different in the remaining 9/21 patients (43 %). Of the nine patients whose differing histologic findings would have led to different clinical management, 4/9 had a high-risk lesion (atypical ductal hyperplasia n = 3, papilloma with epithelial atypia n = 1) vs benign changes (adenosis n = 4), 2/9 had high-grade DCIS vs benign changes (adenosis n = 1, fat necrosis n = 1), and 3/9 had invasive cancer (luminal A n = 2, luminal B n = 1) with high-grade DCIS vs pure high-grade DCIS. CONCLUSIONS:Multiple sites of calcifications within the same breast, even when morphologically similar or equally suspicious, may represent different histopathologic findings with different clinical management implications. Accordingly, in the presence of suspicious calcifications at multiple distinct sites within the same breast, biopsy of more than one site of calcification should be considered.

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive devices (LNG-IUDs) are designed to exhibit only local hormonal effects. There is an ongoing debate on whether LNG-IUDs can have side effects similar to systemic hormonal medication. Benign background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) in dynamic contrast–enhanced (DCE) MRI has been established as a sensitive marker of hormonal stimulation of the breast. We investigated the association between LNG-IUD use and BPE in breast MRI to further explore possible systemic effects of LNG-IUDs. Our hospital database was searched to identify premenopausal women without personal history of breast cancer, oophorectomy, and hormone replacement or antihormone therapy, who had undergone standardized DCE breast MRI at least twice, once with and without an LNG-IUD in place. To avoid confounding aging-related effects on BPE, half of included women had their first MRI without, the other half with, LNG-IUD in place. Degree of BPE was analyzed according to the ACR categories. Wilcoxon-matched-pairs signed-rank test was used to compare the distribution of ACR categories with vs. without LNG-IUD. Forty-eight women (mean age, 46 years) were included. In 24/48 women (50

To investigate whether combining L1-regularized iterative sensitivity encoding (SENSE) reconstruction and single-shot echo planar imaging (EPI) is useful in hepatic DWI. Single-shot EPI-DWI with L1-regularized iterative SENSE reconstruction (L1-DWI) and conventional parallel imaging-based reconstruction (conv-DWI) in liver MRI were compared in volunteers and patients. For the patient cohort, 75 subjects (60 ± 13 years) with 349 focal liver lesions (FLL) were included. Patient groups A and B were used to reduce acquisition time or improve spatial resolution, respectively. Image parameters were rated on a 5-point scale. The number of FLLs was recorded; in case of discrepancy, the reason for non-detectability was analyzed. In volunteers, higher signal-to-noise ratio (24.4 ± 5.6 vs. 12.2 ± 2.3, p < 0.001 at b = 0; 19.3 ± 2.8 vs. 9.8 ± 1.6, p < 0.001 at b = 800) and lower standard deviation of the apparent diffusion coefficient-values (0.17 vs. 0.20 mm2/s, p < 0.05) were found on L1-DWI compared to conv-DWI. In patients, image ratings were similar for all parameters except for “conspicuity of FLLs” which was rated significantly lower on L1-DWI vs. conv-DWI (4.7 ± 0.6 vs. 4.2 ± 0.9, p < 0.05) in group A. In five patients, 11/349 FLLs were not detectable on L1-DWI, but on conv-DWI. L1-regularized iterative reconstruction of single-shot EPI DWI can accelerate image acquisition or improve spatial resolution. However, our finding that FLLs were non-detectable on L1-DWI warrants further research.